ML062210062

Allegation Review Board Disposition Record

ML062210062
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	01/08/2004
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194, RI-2003-A-0110
Download: ML062210062 (3)

Text

'i g:\alleg\panel\200301 1Oarb8.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2003-A-01 10 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem/Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 01/08/2004 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Current Actions on Tech Issues and SCWE Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee? Issue will not be referred to licensee ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blouph Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Neff, Wilson, Teator RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Holody, Eichenholz, Lanninq, Urban, Barber, H Miller DISPOSITION ACTIONS:

1) 11IC Responsible Person: Wilson ECD: TBD Closure Documentation: Completed:

2) DRP to provide drafted violation(s) to 01 and SAC for the file.

Responsible Person: Meyer/Barber ECD: 1/16/2004 Closure Documentation: Completed:

3) DRP to compare depth of surveys at PSEG with those some other utilities such as Susquehanna. Provide documentation of results to SAC and 01 for file.

Responsible Person: Meyer/Barber ECD: 1/3012004 Closure Documentation: Completed:

4) Complete the interviews of the Hope Creek shift managers and other key operations staff. Upon completion of those interviews determine whether additional licensee staff interviews are needed, make an initial assessment of the work environment, and consider whether NRC action is needed to address any environment concerns (example, SCWE inspection, management meeting, chill effect letter, demand for information, order, etc. for the purpose of obtaining information regarding licensee's actions, taken or planned, to address those environment concerns). (all 5 shift managers at Salem have been interviewed).

Responsible Person: Meyer/Barber ECD: 1/30/04 Closure Documentation: Completed: __

Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information 2 Act, exemptions X EXHIBIT2 -

004-00, 00 ZO A.

PAGE ( OF 3 PAGE(S)

2 ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB

3

5) Upon completion of the additional interviews reconvene as needed to determine need for a chilling effect letter or other action.

Responsible Person: Panel ECD: 1/30/2004 Closure Documentation: Completed:

6) DRP will continue to update the summary of technical issues on weekly basis considering information from additional information from interviews, and information from review of transcripts of completed interviews. DRS has completed review of TARP reports and NRB documentation and will discuss at the next ARB panel.

DRP/DRS to assess.

Responsible Person: Meyer/Jackson ECD: Ongoing Closure Documentation: Completed:

7) Repanel to review listing of attributes/behaviors developed by the SAC as being representative of a good Safety culture/SCWE, to be used as a point of comparison for outcomes of the SCWE review, and possibly considering how other events/activities/inspection findings at the site feed into that comparison.

Responsible Person: SAC ECD: TBD Closure Documentation: Completed:

8) DRP/DRS to continue review of interview transcripts and provide summaries in terms of safety culture/SCWE and technical issues.

Responsible Person: Blough/Lannina ECD: Ongoing Closure Documentation: Completed:

7) Next periodic ARB Responsible Person: SAC ECD: 1/29/2004 Closure Documentation: Completed:

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: SCWE Review PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION: High If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):

Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):

ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wronqdoinq matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01, DOL, or DOJ):

What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?

When did the potential violation occur?._

(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)

Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.