|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24340A0892024-12-0404 December 2024 Level 1 Finding Corrective Action Plan ML21075A1582021-03-15015 March 2021 E-mail from T. Silko to J. Parrott, NMSS, Vermont Yankee on the State of Vermont Comments on the Review of the Draft Final SER and EA for 20.2002 Alternate Disposal Request ML21006A0242020-12-22022 December 2020 E-mail from J. Parrott to J. Tierney and N. Creed Vermont Yankee Request to NRC for Alternate Disposal of Wastewater ML20358A0702020-12-22022 December 2020 E-mail Acceptance Review for Request for Indirect License Transfer (License DPR-28, Docket No. 50-271) ML20175A2122020-06-23023 June 2020 Acceptance Review of Request for Alternate Disposal of Wastes Under 10 CFR 20.2002 (License DPR-28, Docket No. 50-271) ML19289A1292019-10-11011 October 2019 Email from Daniel Doyle to Mark Leyse Status of PRM-50-93 and PRM-50-95 ML19288A0292019-10-11011 October 2019 NRC Acceptance Review - Northstar Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 20, App G, Section Iii.E (License DPR-28, Docket No. 50-271) ML19198A2512019-06-20020 June 2019 Alternate Disposal Request - Rail Shipments (License DPR-28, Docket No. 50-271) ML19059A1782019-02-28028 February 2019 Acceptance Review Results for Relief Request No. EN-19-RR-1 to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1 for Entergy Fleet ML18289A3622018-10-11011 October 2018 Email from Daniel Doyle to Mark Leyse Status of PRM-50-93 and PRM-50-95 ML18127A5582018-04-25025 April 2018 Email to State of Vermont on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station - Forthcoming Issuance of a License Amendment Regarding the Requirement for the VYNPS to Have a Cyber Security Plan ML18045A0862018-01-25025 January 2018 Email Request for Review of the Draft Safety Evaluation for Implementation of a Revised Emergency Plan at Vermont Yankee to Reflect an ISFSI-only Configuration ML17353A0092017-12-18018 December 2017 E-Mail from William Irwin, Vermont Department of Health to Y. Chen/Dsfm Response: Draft Environmental Assessment: Exemption Request for Vermont Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML17289A4222017-10-16016 October 2017 E-Mail from Y. J. Chen to W. Irwin Draft Environmental Assessment Exemption Request for Vermont Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML17257A0022017-09-14014 September 2017 Email to VY Shpo W Ltr Re VYNPS Exemption Load Campaign - Sept 2017 ML17229B4842017-08-16016 August 2017 Request for Supplemental Documentation to Support Review of the Physical Security Plan ML17219A0472017-08-0303 August 2017 8/03/2017, E-Mail from Y. J. Chen/Nmss to T. B. Silko/Vermont Yankee Regarding Need for Additional Information Entergys Exemption Request for Vermont Yankee ISFSI, Dated May 16, 2017 (ML17142A358) ML17144A0452017-05-23023 May 2017 5/23/2017, E-Mail to I. William/Vermont Dept. of Health from Y. Chen/Nrc Response: Draft Environment Assessment: Exemption Request for Vermont Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (W/Attachment Ltr to Address Comments on EA) ML17080A4752017-03-16016 March 2017 3/16/2017, E-Mail from I. William/Vermont Department of Health to Yen-Ju Chen/Dsfm/Sflb, Providing Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment for Entergy/Vermont Yankee'S Exemption from Requirement of 10 CFR 72.7 for CoC No. 72-1014, Amendm ML17055A6262017-02-24024 February 2017 Cover Email from VY SHPO W Concurrence on No Effects Determination ML17040A3372017-02-0909 February 2017 Email and Letter to Vermont SHPO ISFSI Exemption No Effects Determination ML17038A4682017-02-0707 February 2017 2/07/2017, E-mail from Yen-Ju Chen/NRC-DSFM to W. Irwin/Vermont Dept. of Health Draft Environment Assessment for Entergy/Vermont Yankee'S Exemption from Requirement of 10 CFR 72.7 for Certificate of Compliance No. 72-1014, Amendment 10 ML17012A2472017-01-11011 January 2017 E-mail - State of Vermont Comments Regarding Vermont Yankee'S 10 CFR 20.2002 Request ML16349A2492016-12-13013 December 2016 E-Mail to T. B. Silko/Entergy from Yen-Ju Chen/Dsfm Regarding Need for Supplemental Information for Entergy'S Exemption Request for Vermont Yankee ISFSI, Dated November 9, 2016 (ML16319A102) ML17013A2502016-12-12012 December 2016 Email Requesting Review of Draft EA and SER for Vermont Yankee Request to NRC for Alternate Disposal of Waste ML16231A0282016-08-11011 August 2016 Response to NRC Questions Related to Request for 20.2002 Disposal of Contaminated Water ML16231A2192016-07-28028 July 2016 Follow-up Questions Related to Entergy Request for 20.2002 Disposal of Contaminated Water ML16069A0952016-03-0303 March 2016 Request for 20.2002 Disposal, Request for Additional Information ML16053A5152016-02-17017 February 2016 Comment (037) of Emma Stamas on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML15329A1802015-11-24024 November 2015 E-mail from J. Whited Draft RAIs Re Duke License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-523 (CAC Nos. MF6413 Through MF6422) ML15295A2132015-10-21021 October 2015 NRR E-mail Capture - VY RAI for Off-site Insurance Exemption (10 CFR 140.11) - MF3980 ML15289A6002015-09-24024 September 2015 La 3 - Vermont Yankee Draft Responses or Edits 9 24 15.docx ML15289A6012015-09-23023 September 2015 La 3 - Nrr_Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Decommissioning Status.Docx ML15288A3532015-09-21021 September 2015 La 3 - VY Dtf LAR - Status ML15257A6172015-09-14014 September 2015 La 3 - Testing the New Profile for Vermont Yankee La 3 - Public ML15195A3592015-07-14014 July 2015 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Vermont Yankee Amendment -Revise Cyber Security Plan Implementation ML15289A0022015-06-17017 June 2015 La 3 - Question from Ma ML15289A5982015-06-0909 June 2015 La 3 - FW: Docket No. 50-271 (Vermont Yankee); June 5 2015 Letter from Vermont, Vynpc, and Gmp to NRC Attached ML15289A0072015-06-0505 June 2015 La 3 - Information Regarding Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Trust Fund Exemption ML15289A2432015-06-0404 June 2015 La 3 - FW: Docket No. 50-271 (Vermont Yankee); June 4 2015 Vermont Letter to NRC Attached ML15289A0062015-06-0404 June 2015 La 3 - FW: Information Regarding Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Trust Fund Exemption ML15288A3592015-06-0101 June 2015 La 3 - Vermont Yankee LA3 - Availability for Oral Argument ML15288A3602015-06-0101 June 2015 La 3 - Vermont Yankee LA3 - Availability for Oral Argument ML15288A3622015-06-0101 June 2015 La 3 - Vermont Yankee LA3 - Availability for Oral Argument ML15288A4822015-05-22022 May 2015 La 3 - Vermont Reply to NRC & Entergy Answers Re VY LA-3 ML15289A0042015-05-19019 May 2015 La 3 - New Proposal Dates for Phone Call with VT ML15289A0052015-05-11011 May 2015 La 3 - ML Numbers for Disbursement Letters for Vermont Yankee ML15289A5992015-05-0808 May 2015 La 3 - Call with State of VT ML15289A0032015-05-0707 May 2015 La 3 - Other than for Comanche Peak, ML15289A1252015-05-0606 May 2015 La 3 - FRN Review - VY Dtf Exemption 2024-12-04
[Table view] |
Text
I Rick Ennis - Three new EMEB RAls Page 1l IRcEnns-TrenwEERAsPg1 From: Rick Ennis To: Ronda Daflucas Date: 7/12/05 1:27PM
Subject:
Three new EMEB RAls Ronda, Attached are three new draft RAls from Pat Sekerak in EMEB. These questions are items that he determined EMEB needed clarification or additional information on to complete the non-steam dryer portions of their review. Please let me know if you want to set up a conference call.
thanks, Rick CC: Brian Hobbs; Brooke Poole; Cheng-lh Wu; Craig Nichols; Darrell Roberts; Gene Imbro; Jim DeVincentis; Kamal Manoly; Len Gucwa; Rebecca Karas; S. Patrick Sekerak; Thomas Scarbrough
I c-XtemD\GWI00001.TMP Paae Pae I1 1 c:\temo\GW O OO .TM Mail Envelope Properties (42D3FD90.1 B 1: 15: 20516)
Subject:
Three new EMEB RAIs Creation Date: 7/12/05 1:27PM From: Rick Ennis Created By: RXE~nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time owf2po.OWFNDO Delivered 07/12/05 01:27PM TGS CC (Thomas Scarbrough) owf4_po.OWFNDO Delivered 07/12/05 01:27PM DJR CC (Darrell Roberts) entergy.com bhobbs CC (Brian Hobbs) cnichol CC (Craig Nichols) jdevinc CC (Jim DeVincentis)
LGUCW90 CC (Len Gucwa) rdafluc (Ronda Daflucas) nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDO01 Delivered 07/12/05 01:27PM EXI CC (Gene Imbro) nrc.gov owf2_o.OWFNDO Delivered 07/12/05 01:27PM CIWI CC (Cheng-Ih Wu)
KAM CC (Kamal Manoly) nrc.gov owf4po.OWFNDO Delivered 07/12/05 01:27PM PXSI CC (S. Patrick Sekerak)
RLK CC (Rebecca Karas) nrc.gov owf5_o.OWFN DO Delivered 07/12/05 01:27PM BDP CC (Brooke Poole)
Post Office Delivered Route owf2po.OWFNDO 07/12/05 01:27PM owf4po.OWFNDO 07/12/05 01:27PM Pending entergy.com OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO0I 07/12/05 01:27PM nrc.gov
I I c:\temP\GW100001.TMPX Page 21" Pae 2 I c:tem\GWIOOO .TM owf2_po.OWFNDO 07/12/05 01:27PM nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFNDO 07/12/05 01:27PM nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO 07/12/05 01:27PM nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 833 07/12/05 01:27PM psekerak emeb rai.wpd 4046 07/12/05 01:17PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened
147. On page 3-4 of Attachment 4 to the application dated September 10, 2003, ASME Code Section Xl, Subsection IWB-3641 is cited as the code requirements governing the stress analysis of the modification of the Core Spray nozzle and safe end. Please discuss the applicability of IWB-3641, which provides procedures for piping flaw evaluation, in lieu of the original Code of construction for analysis of modifications made to this component.
148. On page 3-20 of Attachment 4 to the application dated September 10, 2003, the section addressing pipe stresses states: "For those systems that do not require a detailed analysis, pipe routing and flexibility was evaluated and determined to be acceptable."
a) Discuss the method used for evaluating flexibility of piping.
b) What acceptance criteria are applicable to the flexibility evaluation?
c) Which piping systems were evaluated with this approach?
149. On page 3-35, Table 3-3, of Attachment 4 to the application dated September 10, 2003, the primary plus secondary stress level reported for the feedwater nozzle and safe end under CPPU conditions is extremely close to the allowable ASME Code limit. Please discuss the general analytical approach used to calculate this stress. Also, explain the primary reasons for the 21 % increase in stress over the CLTP stress reported, and why the feedwater nozzle CPPU stress and usage factor increases are so much larger than the increases for the other components listed in Table 3-3.