ML050490124

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

11/5/04: (27 Pages -Slides) U3R11 SG Loose Part
ML050490124
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 11/05/2004
From: Sweeney K
Arizona Public Service Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Fields M B ,NRR/DLPM,415-3062
Shared Package
ML050490137 List:
References
TAC MC4292
Download: ML050490124 (27)


Text

11/5/2004 1

U3R11 SG Loose Part Kevin Sweeney System Engineering P

A L

O V

E R D

E

11/5/2004 2

Loose Part removed from SG 32

11/5/2004 3

Tubesheet FOSAR - Affected Tubes

11/5/2004 4

PLP/PLI Affected Tubes Centerline of Screw #5

11/5/2004 5

Tube Bundle Shroud Eggcrate Tube Support Center Support Cylinder Flow Distribution Baffle Feedwater Box Economizer Elevation View Location of High Flow resulting in Cold Leg Corner Wear 02C

11/5/2004 6

11/5/2004 7

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

Deflector Plate

11/5/2004 8

Feedbox cutout BE SG

11/5/2004 9

Brooks Robot/Camera Magnetic Wheels -

Robot to roll along the shell Camera &

Light to look up FW box holes If needed to confirm presence of screws an articulating camera can be extended

11/5/2004 10 Inspection Results - Set Screw #4 Evidence of erosion or skewness

11/5/2004 11 Inspection Results - Set Screw #5 Set Screw missing

11/5/2004 12 Inspection Results - Proper Installation

11/5/2004 13 Set Screw #12 (SG 31)

11/5/2004 14 Feedring Flow Holes Deflector Plate

11/5/2004 15 Rereview of Eddy Current

  • Eddy current results from U3R11 reviewed after FW Box FOSAR Findings

- All calls from TSC to 03C

- Three (3) tubes found with wear at 02C

  • R127C40 - 10% wear
  • R129C40 - 20% wear
  • R130C41 - 25% wear
  • Historical review indicated no previous wear or precursors

- Further review indicated tubes directly inline with #5 hole

11/5/2004 16 Analysis/Evaluation Approach

  • Four (4) impact assessment areas addressed

- Feedwater box integrity

- Streaming Flow through screw hole

  • Tube wear
  • SG Performance

- Loose Part Wear

  • Transport Probability
  • Projected Wear Rates
  • Impact Damage

- Active and Inactive tubes

- Unit 1 Operability

11/5/2004 17 Feedwater Box Integrity

  • Set Screw Design Function

- Prevent Feedwater Box collapse during FWLB

  • Feedwater Box/Economizer not credited during FWLB
  • Assure negative impact to tubing not generated
  • Analysis

- Westinghouse developed 3-D FEA model

- Assumed two (2) set screws per 90 degree section missing

  • Results

- Insignificant increase in elastically calculated stresses

- Box deflects outwards away from tube bundle

  • Maximum displacement less than 1/4 inch

11/5/2004 18 FEA Model Feedwater Box with screws missing

11/5/2004 19 Streaming Flow

  • Analysis Approach

- FIV analysis

  • Similar to analytical effort performed for SG mods
  • Calculate stability ratio

- Acceptance criteria - <= 1.0

- Ratio > 1 - increased potential for fluid-elastic instability and wear

  • ATHOS model used
  • Results

- Stability ratio slightly greater than 1

- Consistent with observed wear

- Flow rates much less than cold leg corner phenomenon

  • 27 ft/sec vs 46 ft/sec

- Negligible impact on SG performance (<1 psi)

11/5/2004 20 Streaming Flow

  • Recommended Actions - Unit 3

- Three tubes with indicated wear

  • Plugged and Staked

- Develop preventative plugging strategy for screw locations adjacent to deflector plates

  • Determined that five (5) tubes per location affected

- Twenty tubes (minimum) per SG

- Reviewed ECT data in U2 OSGs and Unit 1

  • No indication of wear or wear precursor at any locations

11/5/2004 21 Tube Pattern - Streaming Flow

11/5/2004 22 Loose Part Wear

  • Analysis Approach

- Address wear potential

  • Transport probability

- Geometric Probability

  • Wear rate analysis

- Archard Theory

  • Impact analysis

- Active tubes

- Inactive tubes

- Loose part wear approach consistent with Engineering Study 02-MS-A76

11/5/2004 23 Loose Part Wear

  • Transport Probability

- Factors

  • Diameter of Screw relative to feedring hole diameter

- Both two (2) inch

>> Set Screw has chamfered end

>> Flow holes may be slightly enlarged (erosion)

>> Probability estimate

  • Flow hole must be aligned

- Unlikely

>> Inspection indicates mis-alignment (cold condition)

  • Cross flow and drop angle make vertical alignment unlikely

- Cross Flow force 10 lb vs 4 lb set screw

- Conclusion -

  • Most likely location - lying on feedwater ring with no access to tube bundle - flows and flow direction insufficient to upright screw

11/5/2004 24 Loose Part Wear

  • Wear Rate Analysis
  • Archard Theory of Wear V = KFND
  • Wear Rates projected to be low

- Weight/Shape of screw in expected low flow field (1.5 ft/sec) results in low contact force

- Fixity of tubes at the tubesheet minimizes sliding motion

  • Expected position to be horizontal

- Consistent with U3R11 findings

  • No operating cycle restrictions for Units 3 or 1 with respect to loose part wear

11/5/2004 25 Loose Part Wear

  • Impact damage

- Active tubes

  • Condition is pure impact without sliding
  • Based on combination of flow and weight, test data indicates that resulting dents would be slightly greater than 1 mil

- Inactive tubes

  • Industry experience (Ginna) of loose part impact interaction resulting in collapse of plugged, unpressurized tube
  • Despite minimal impact load - Engineering elected to provide caging of plugged, unstaked tubes on tube bundle periphery in regions considered within expected transport range

- 15 rows from hole locations

  • Action taken in both SGs

11/5/2004 26 Unit 1 Operability Operability evaluation

- Design of Feedwater Box - no difference

  • Similar erosion/corrosion can not be ruled out

- Wear Review

  • ECT Data from U1R11 and U2R10 (OSGs) shows no indication of wear in the affected regions

- Condition (streaming flow) assumed not to exist at end of Cycle 11

- FOSAR

  • FOSAR exam performed in both SGs

- No evidence of loose part

- Analysis

  • Analysis in support of Unit 3 indicates no expected impact to tube integrity

- Tube plugging in Unit 3 preventative in nature

- Integrity

  • Leak and burst testing/industry experience validate leak stability for wear indications - should leak occur timely, orderly shutdown would result

- PVNGS shutdown limits more conservative than EPRI limits

11/5/2004 27 Remaining Actions Complete Plugging and Staking in Unit 3

- 30 tubes total in SG 32

- 37 tubes total in SG 31

- Expected completion - 11/7 Westinghouse to provide final QAd analysis reports

- FEA Analysis

- Wear Analysis

- Expected 11/12 DFWO

- DFWO to include Condition Monitoring (CM) Report per NEI 97-06

  • CM will document all the actions and analyses to conclude no impacts on tube integrity - Mode 4 restraint CRDR

- Document all actions taken and address transportability

  • No corrective measure for Unit 1 - last cycle of operation for OSG
  • Evaluate potential need for future inspections in RSG