ML032671131

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tech Spec for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, License Amendment, Delete Reactor Building Purge Air Treatment System
ML032671131
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/23/2003
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
TAC MB7252
Download: ML032671131 (8)


Text

TABLE OF CONTENTS-Section Page 2 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2-1 2.1 Safetv Limits. Reactor Core 2-1 2.2 Safety Limits. Reactor System Pressure 2-4 2.3 Limiting Safetv System Settings. Protection Instrumentation 2-5 3 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 3-1 3.0 General Action Reouirements 3-1 3.1 Reactor Coolant System 3-1 a 3.1.1 Operational Components 3-1a 3.1.2 Pressurization, Heatup and Cooldown Limitations 3-3 3.1.3 Minimum Conditions for Criticality 3-6 3.1.4 Reactor Coolant System Activity 3-8 3.1.5 Chemistry 3-10 3.1.6 Leakage 3-12 3.1.7 Moderator Temperature Coefficient of Reactivity 3-16 3.1.8 Single Loop Restrictions 3-17 3.1.9 Low Power Physics Testing Restrictions 3-18 3.1.10 Control Rod Operation (Deleted) 3-18a 3.1.11 Reactor Internal Vent Valves 3-18c 3.1.12 Pressurizer Power Operated Relief Valve (PORV),

Block Valve, and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) 3-18d 3.1.13 Reactor Coolant System Vents 3-18f 3.2 Deleted 3-19 3.3 Emeraencv Core Cooling. Reactor Building Emergency Cooling and Reactor Building Sorav Systems 3-21 3.4 Decay Heat Removal (DHR) Canability 3-25 3.4.1 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Temperature Greater than 250 Degrees F 3-25 3.4.2 RCS Temperature Less Than or Equal to 250 Degrees F 3-26a 3.5 Instrumentation Systems 3-27 3.5.1 Operational Safety Instrumentation 3-27 3.5.2 Control Rod Group and Power Distribution Limits 3-33 3.5.3 Engineered Safeguards Protection System Actuation Setpoints 3-37 3.5.4 Incore Instrumentation (Deleted) 3-38 3.5.5 Accident Monitoring Instrumentation 3-40a 3.5.6 Deleted 3-40f 3.5.7 Remote Shutdown System 3-40g 3.6 Reactor Building 3-41 3.7 Unit Electrical Power System 3-42 3.8 Fuel Loadina and Refueling 3-44 3.9 Deleted 3-46 3.10 Miscellaneous Radioactive Materials Sources 3-46 3.11 Handling of Irradiated Fuel 3-55 3.12 Reactor Buildina Polar Crane 3-57 3.13 Secondary Sstem Activity 3-58 3.14 Flood 3-59 3.14.1 Periodic Inspection of the Dikes Around TMI 3-59 3.14.2 Flood Condition for Placing the Unit in Hot Standby 3-60 3.15 Air Treatment Systems 3-61 3.15.1 Emergency Control Room Air Treatment System 3-61 3.15.2 Reactor Building Purge Air Treatment System (Deleted) 3-62a 3.15.3 Auxiliary and Fuel Handling Building Air Treatment System 3-62c 3.15.4 Fuel Handling Building ESF Air Treatment System 3-62e ii Amendment No. 60, 72, 78, 7, 8,11,122,136, 1, 167, 182, 16,211, 216,24,4242, 245

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Paae 4.8 MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVES 4-51 4.9 DECAY HEAT REMOVAL (DHR) CAPABILITY - PERIODIC TESTING 4-52 4.9.1 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS) TEMPERATURE GREATER THAN 250 DEGREES F 4-52 4.9.2 RCS TEMPERATURE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 250 DEGREES F 4-52a 4.10 REACTIVITY ANOMALIES 4-53 4.11 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM VENTS 4-54 4.12 AIR TREATMENT SYSTEMS 4-55 4.12.1 EMERGENCY CONTROL ROOM AIR TREATMENT SYSTEM 4-55 4.12.2 REACTOR BUILDING PURGE AIR TREATMENT SYSTEM (DELETED) 4-55b 4.12.3 AUXILIARY AND FUEL HANDLING BUILDING AIR TREATMENT 4-55d SYSTEM 4.13 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS SOURCES SURVEILLANCE 4-56 4.14 DELETED 4-56 4.15 MAIN STEAM SYSTEM INSERVICE INSPECTION 4-58 4.16 REACTOR INTERNALS VENT VALVES SURVEILLANCE 4-59 4.17 SHOCK SUPPRESSORS (SNUBBERS) 4-60 4.18 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (DELETED) 4-72 4.19 OTSG TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION 4-77 4.19.1 STEAM GENERATOR SAMPLE SELECTION AND INSPECTION 4-77 METHODS 4.19.2 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE SAMPLE SELECTION AND INSPECTION 4-77 4.19.3 INSPECTION FREQUENCIES 4-79 4.19.4 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 4-80 4.19.5 REPORTS 4-81 4.20 REACTOR BUILDING AIR TEMPERATURE 4-86 4.21 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION (DELETED) 4-87 4.21.1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION (DELETED) 4-87 4.21.2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS PROCESS AND EFFLUENT MONITORING 4-87 INSTRUMENTATION (DELETED) 4.22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS (DELETED) 4-87 4.22.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS (DELETED) 4-87 4.22.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS (DELETED) 4-87 4.22.3 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE (DELETED) 4-87 4.22.4 TOTAL DOSE (DELETED) 4-87 4.23.1 MONITORING PROGRAM (DELETED) 4-87 4.23.2 LAND USE CENSUS (DELETED) 4-87 4.23.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM (DELETED) 4-87 IV Amendment No. 11,22, 30, 41, 17, 65, 72,78, 95,97, 119 122, 129 137,146, 107,242, 245

3.8.8 If any of the above specified limiting conditions for fuel loading and refueling are not met, movement of fuel into the reactor core shall cease; action shall be initiated to correct the conditions so that the specified limits are met, and no operations which may increase the reactivity of the core shall be made.

3.8.9 The reactor building purge isolation valves, and associated radiation monitors which initiate purge isolation, shall be tested and verified to be operable no more than 7 days prior to initial fuel movement in the reactor building.

3.8.10 Irradiated fuel shall not be removed from the reactor until the unit has been subcritical for at least 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.

3.8.11 During the handling of irradiated fuel in the Reactor Building at least 23 feet of water shall be maintained above the level of the reactor pressure vessel flange. If the water level is less than 23 feet above the reactor pressure vessel flange, place the fuel assembly(s) being handled into a safe position, then cease fuel handling until the water level has been restored to 23 feet or greater above the reactor pressure vessel flange.

Bases Detailed written procedures will be available for use by refueling personnel. These procedures, the above specifications, and the design of the fuel handling equipment as described in Section 9.7 of the UFSAR incorporating built-in interlocks and safety features, provide assurance that no incident could occur during the refueling operations that would result in a hazard to public health and safety. If no change is being made in core geometry, one flux monitor is sufficient. This permits maintenance on the instrumentation. Continuous monitoring of radiation levels and neutron flux provides immediate indication of an unsafe condition. The decay heat removal pump is used to maintain a uniform boron concentration. The shutdown margin indicated in Specification 3.8.4 will keep the core subcritical, even with all control rods withdrawn from the core (Reference 1). The boron concentration will be sufficient to maintain the core keff 5 0.99 if all the control rods were removed from the core, however only a few control rods will be removed at any one time during fuel shuffling and replacement. The kf with all rods in the core and with refueling boron concentration is approximately 0.9. Specification 3.8.5 allows the control room operator to inform the reactor building personnel of any impending unsafe condition detected from the main control board indicators during fuel movement.

Per Specification 3.8.6 and 3.8.7, the personnel and emergency air lock doors, and penetrations may be open during movement of irradiated fuel in the containment provided a minimum of one door in each of the air locks, and penetrations are capable of being closed in the event of a fuel handling accident, and the plant is in REFUELING SHUTDOWN or REFUELING OPERATION with at least 23 feet of water above the fuel seated within the reactor pressure vessel. The minimum water level specified is the basis for the accident analysis assumption of a decontamination factor of 200 for the release to the containment atmosphere from the postulated damaged fuel rods located on top of the fuel core seated in the reactor vessel.

Should a fuel handling accident occur inside containment, a minimum of one door in each personnel and emergency air lock, and the open penetrations will be closed following an evacuation of containment. Administrative controls will be in place to assure closure of at least one door in each air lock, as well as other open containment penetrations, following a containment evacuation.

Provisions for equivalent isolation methods in Technical Specification 3.8.7 include use of a material (e.g. temporary sealant) that can provide a temporary, atmospheric pressure ventilation barrier for other containment penetrations during fuel movements.

3-45 Amendment No. 167, 178, 236, 245

Specification 3.8.9 requires testing of the reactor building purge isolation system. This system consists of the four reactor building purge valves and the associated reactor building purge radiation monitor(s). The test verifies that the purge valves will automatically close when they receive initiation signals from the radiation detectors that monitor reactor building purge exhaust. The test is performed no more than 7 days prior to the start of fuel movement in the reactor building to ensure that the monitors, purge valves, and associated interlocks are functioning prior to operations that could result in a fuel handling accident within the reactor building. For conservatism, the Fuel Handling Accident analysis assumes that the four purge valves remain open.

Specification 3.8.10 is required as the safety analysis for the fuel handling accident was based on the assumption that the reactor had been shutdown for 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> (Reference 2).

REFERENCES (1) UFSAR, Section 14.2.2.1 - Fuel Handling Accident" (2) UFSAR, Section 14.2.2.1(2) - FHA Inside Containment" 3-45a Amendment No. 236, 245

3.15.2 REACTOR BUILDING PURGE AIR TREATMENT SYSTEM Deleted 3-62a Amendment No. 66, 67, 76,108, 119, 167, 226, 245

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 3-62b Amendment No. 65, 108, 167, 226, 245

4.12.2 REACTOR BUILDING PURGE AIR TREATMENT SYSTEM Deleted 4-55b Amendment No. 56, 68,108,149, 157,176, 245

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 4-55c Amendment No. 65, 108, 157, 179, 218, 226, 210, 245