ML030440333

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR 05000302-03-002, Notification of Crystal River - Safety System Design & Performance Capability Inspection on 05/05-19/2003
ML030440333
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/2003
From: Ogle C
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB
To: Young D
Florida Power Corp
References
IR-03-002
Download: ML030440333 (7)


See also: IR 05000302/2003002

Text

February 10, 2003

Mr. Dale E. Young, Vice President

Crystal River Nuclear Plant (NA1B)

ATTN: Supervisor, Licensing &

Regulatory Programs

15760 West Power Line Street

Crystal River, FL 34428-6708

SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT - SAFETY SYSTEM

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY INSPECTION - NRC

INSPECTION REPORT 50-302/2003-02

Dear Mr. Young:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Region II staff will conduct a safety system design and performance capability inspection at

your Crystal River Nuclear Plant during the weeks of May 5, 2003, and May 19, 2003. A team

of five inspectors will perform this inspection. The inspection team will be led by

Mr. Jim Moorman, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRC Region II Office. This biennial

inspection will be conducted in accordance with baseline inspection program Attachment

71111.21, Safety System Design and Performance Capability.

The inspection will evaluate the capability of installed plant equipment to detect and respond to

a steam generator tube rupture event. Procedures which direct the mitigating actions for this

event will also be evaluated.

During a telephone conversation on February 6, 2003, Mr. Moorman of my staff, and

Mr. Sid Powell of your staff, confirmed arrangements for an information gathering site visit and

the two-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:

  • Information gathering visit: Week of March 31, 2003
  • Onsite inspection weeks: May 5, 2003 and May 19, 2003

The purpose of the information gathering visit is to obtain information and documentation

outlined in the enclosure needed to support the inspection. Mr. Walter Rogers, a Region II

Senior Reactor Analyst, may accompany Mr. Moorman during the information gathering visit to

review probabilistic risk assessment data and identify risk significant components which will be

examined during the inspection. Please contact Mr. Moorman prior to preparing copies of the

materials listed in the Enclosure. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden

by specifically identifying only those documents required for inspection preparation.

During the information gathering visit, the team leader will also discuss the following inspection

support administrative details: office space; specific documents requested to be made

available to the team in their office space; arrangements for site access; and the availability of

knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during

the inspection.

FPC 2

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the

information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Moorman at (404) 562-4647 or me

at (404) 562-4605.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publically Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Charles R. Ogle, Chief

Engineering Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-302

License Nos.: DPR-72

Enclosure: Information Request for the Safety System Design and

Performance Capability Inspection

cc w/encl:

Daniel L. Roderick

Director Site Operations

Crystal River Nuclear Plant (NA2C)

Electronic Mail Distribution

Jon A. Franke

Plant General Manager

Crystal River Nuclear Plant (NA2C)

Electronic Mail Distribution

Richard L. Warden

Manager Nuclear Assessment

Crystal River Nuclear Plant (NA2C)

Electronic Mail Distribution

Donald L. Taylor

Manager Support Services

Crystal River Nuclear Plant (NA2C)

15760 W. Power Line Street

Crystal River, FL 34428-6708

(cc w/encl contd - See page 3)

FPC 3

(cc w/encl contd)

R. Alexander Glenn

Associate General Counsel (MAC - BT15A)

Florida Power Corporation

Electronic Mail Distribution

Attorney General

Department of Legal Affairs

The Capitol

Tallahassee, FL 32304

William A. Passetti

Bureau of Radiation Control

Department of Health

Electronic Mail Distribution

Craig Fugate, Director

Division of Emergency Preparedness

Department of Community Affairs

Electronic Mail Distribution

Chairman

Board of County Commissioners

Citrus County

110 N. Apopka Avenue

Inverness, FL 36250

Jim Mallay

Framatome Technologies

Electronic Mail Distribution

Distribution w/encl:

J. Goshen, NRR

L. Slack, RII EICS

RIDSNRRDIPMLIPB

PUBLIC

OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRP

SIGNATURE MOORMAN MUNDAY

NAME Moorman Munday

DATE 2/10/2003 2/10/2003 2/ /2003 2/ /2003 2/ /2003 2/ /2003 2/ /2003

E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

PUBLIC DOCUMENT YES NO

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML030440333.wpd

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR THE SAFETY SYSTEM DESIGN AND

PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY INSPECTION

STEAM GENERATOR TUBE RUPTURE EVENT

Note: Electronic media is preferred if readily available. (The preferred file format is

searchable .pdf files on CDROM. The CDROM should be indexed to facilitate use.

Please provide 5 copies of each CDROM submitted.)

1. Design basis documents for the engineered safety features and other systems used to

mitigate the steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) event. Design basis documents for

the high, intermediate, and low voltage electrical systems that power these components.

Design basis documents for pressurizer relief valves, secondary system relief valves,

atmospheric dump valves and turbine bypass valves. Include performance history of

these valves for the past 10 years.

2. All procedures used to implement the mitigation strategy for the SGTR event. Include

alarm response procedures as well as emergency, abnormal, and normal operating

procedures as appropriate.

3. Procedures used for the operational testing of check valves in the auxiliary feedwater

(AFW) systems and portions of the emergency core cooling systems used during

mitigation of the SGTR event.

4. Surveillance procedures used to ensure the operability of equipment required by your

Technical Specifications that is used during the mitigation of the SGTR event.

5. Summary results of the steam generator (SG) in service inspection program.

6. List of temporary modifications and operator work-arounds involving any components

required for detection or mitigation of a SGTR event for the past 3 years.

7. List of major modifications to any components required for detection or mitigation of a

SGTR event completed in the past 5 years.

8. List of deferred modifications for any components required for detection or mitigation of

a SGTR event.

9. System description and operator training modules for the SGTR event.

10. List of operating experience program evaluations of industry, vendor, or NRC generic

issues related to a SGTR event.

11. Procedures used to sample the reactor coolant system during a SGTR event.

12. Calibration and functional testing procedures for the main steam line, condenser air

ejector, and steam generator blowdown. radiation monitoring instrumentation.

Enclosure

2

13. Calculations used to support the set points in Emergency Operating Procedures for a

SGTR event.

14. Performance history of valves or support equipment used to isolate SGs in the event of

a tube rupture.

15. Calibration and functional test procedures of instruments used to monitor reactor coolant

system (RCS) pressure, pressurizer level and pressure, SG level and pressure, hot and

cold leg temperature, subcooling monitor, feedwater flow, steam flow, core exit

temperature, high pressure injection (HPI) flow, low pressure injection flow, refueling

water storage tank level, pressurized heater status, safety relief valve position indicator,

AFW flow, condensate storage tank (CST) level, makeup flow, and letdown flow.

16. P&IDs for RCS, HPI, SI, AFW, chemical and volume control system, main steam and

other systems used to mitigate the SGTR event. P&IDs for the high, intermediate, and

low voltage electrical systems which supply power to these components. (Paper copies

are preferred for these.)

17. Electrical schematic showing start circuit for the AFW pumps. (Paper copies are

preferred for these.)

18. Test procedures for the primary and secondary system safety relief valves including any

position indications and code safety valves.

19. Loop uncertainly calculations for SG level, pressurizer pressure and level, and RCS

pressure.

20. Test procedures for any defeat switches associated with AFW starting/control logic, if

applicable.

21. Instrument loop diagrams for items identified in Number 16 above. (Paper copies are

preferred for these.)

22. Probabilistic risk assessment event tree for the SGTR event. A list of PRA identified

system dependencies and success criteria for systems used to mitigate a steam

generator tube rupture.

23. System health reports and all performance monitoring information for systems used to

detect and mitigate the SGTR event and their power supply systems.

24. A list of Problem Evaluation Reports and non-routine work requests initiated since 1998

affecting the systems used to detect and mitigate the SGTR event.

25. Maintenance Rule performance criteria for systems used to detect and mitigate the

SGTR event and their electrical power systems. A list of maintenance rule failures of

equipment and their power supplies that are used to detect or mitigate the SGTR event.

Enclosure

3

26. Key electrical single line diagrams of the high, intermediate, and low voltage alternating

current systems and of the direct current power systems that provide power for the

pumps, valves, and instrumentation and control circuits associated with the systems that

accomplish the SGTR mitigation strategy. (Paper copies are preferred for these.)

27. Provide a list of equipment used to mitigate a SGTR that changes state or is manually

manipulated during implementation of the SGTR mitigation strategy. Provide equipment

failure rates over the past 10 years for these components.

28. Plant Technical Specifications, Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual

29. A current copy of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.

Enclosure