ML023040054
| ML023040054 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/2002 |
| From: | NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD3 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| TAC MB0695, TAC MB0696 | |
| Download: ML023040054 (43) | |
Text
Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Section 1.0- Use and Application (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
I
~
- S~mm~"
~-"~j'~'.'2-
'4 I [r5ectlon F CTS Section
'tc:);>OC 7-
.~
A1.0-00 Al.0-05 Updates CTS reference for COLR in accordance with NRC approved LAR.
1.1 1.0-1.1 1.0 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not revise or delete any technical requirements.
Rewords CTS definitions of ACTIONS, CHANNEL CHECK, CORE ALTERATION, COLR, DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131, E-AVERAGE DISINTEGRATION ENERGY, OPERATIONAL MODE MODE, OPERABLE - OPERABILITY, PTLR, QPTR, RTP, SDM, and STAGGERED TEST BASIS. These changes do not revise the meaning or intent of the current PI definitions.
Rewords CTS definition of CHANNEL CALIBRATION to specifically reference testing of resistance temperature detectors or thermocouple sensors, allowing in place qualitative assessment of sensor behavior, and normal calibration of the remaining devices in the channel.
These changes do not substantively change the Prairie Island methodology for calibration of plant Instrumentation.
A1.0-01 Al.0-04 CO0LR Prairie Island ITS
.*hilv 9002 1.1 1.0 11.0 CHANNEL CALIBRATION 1) 11.1 Ji
-i 1"n 1.0
- ACTIONS, CHANNEL CHECK, CORE ALTERATION, COLR, DOSE EQUIVALENT I 131, E-AVERAGE DISINTEGRATION
- ENERGY, OPERATIONAL MODE - MODE, OPERABLE OPERABILITY, PTLR, QPTR, RTP, SDM, and STAGGERED TEST BASIS
-1,,
1.
la a 14
-1.0 I1.1 I,!1*
11.1
Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Section 1.0 - Use and Application (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
Summary_
A1.0-06 Rewords CTS wording and re-titles definition of CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST to conform to CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST (COT). These changes do not substantively change the PI methodology for testing of these instruments.
Did not include CTS definition of LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS. This is an Administrative change since the justification for not including LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS is in the discussion of CTS.
Rewords CTS definition of OPERABLE - OPERABILITY. Additional clarification was provided specifically allowing credit for both "normal or emergency power" instead of only stating normal power. These changes do not substantively change the definition of OPERABLE OPERABILITY.
Rewords CTS definition of PHYSICS TESTS. The allowed power level for PHYSICS TESTS is now related to the definition of power level at which the MODE changes from MODE 2 to MODE
- 1.
Did not include CTS definition for PROTECTION INSTRUMENTATION AND LOGIC since it is not used in the ITS.
Did not include CTS definition for SOURCE CHECK since it is addressed within the definition of CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST (COT).
aT Scto 1.1 1.0 NA 1.1 1.1 1.0 NA 1.0 NA INA Al.0-08 A1.0-09 A1.0-11 A1.0-12 SA1.0-18 Al.0-19 Rewords CTS STAGGERED TEST BASIS by deleting the second paragraph which is consistent with rules and use of ISTS STAGGERED TEST BASIS. Any differences in use of this term between CTS and ITS are accounted for by changing instrument test Frequencies in Section 3.3.
cTS Section 1.0 CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1.0 LSSS 1.0 OPERABLE 1.0 PHYSICS TESTS 1.0 PROTECTION INSTR & LOGIC 1.0 SOURCE CHECK TEST BASIS 2
Prairie Island ITS I
'I 1.1 1.0 STAGGERED L
Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Section 1.0 - Use and Application (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Doc1o Summary
,ITS Section CTS Section DOC No, Sumr
.~Scto I.
Did not include CTS definition for STARTUP OPERATION since the CTS and ITS are consistent and all phases of plant operation are included within the definition of MODES listed in Table 1.1
- 1.
Clarifies use of Logical Connectors to aid in the understanding and use of the new format, presentation style, and establish positions not previously formalized. These changes do not involve any substantive changes in plant operations or testing.
Adds a section explaining the use of the Frequencies specified within the SRs to aid in the understanding and use of the ITS format, presentation style, and establish positions not previously formalized. This explanation does not involve any substantive change in plant operations or testing.
i -
L.
1.4 NA A1.0-29 Rewords CTS clarifying that SRs can be suspended when the plant is not in the Mode of 11.4 Applicability associated with the SR. The intent of the CTS and NUREG/ITS requirements are the same and no plant operating or testing requirement changes have been introduced.
[ ISTARTUP 3
Prairie Island ITS A1.0-21 A1.0-24 Al.0-28 ig Ar %
ISTARTUP 1.2 NA INA 11.4 14.1.D
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 2.0 - Safety Limits (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
'-Jj.
Sumddtnary ITS Section
-
-.- -
I.
U.
.. '-';-,
ILCO 2.0 ILCO 2.0 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not revise or delete any technical requirements.
Minor format and wording changes have been made to CTS Section 2.1, 2.2.A, and 2.2.B. Whichdo not change the meaning, limits or otherwise change plant operation or testing.
IT eto LCO 2.1.1, LCO 2.1.1, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2 LIO2.1 SLCO 2.1, "2.1.B, 2.2, 2.2.A, and 2.2.B 1
Prairie Island ITS July 2002 A2.0-00 A2.0-01 CTSSeto
?LCO 2.0 ILCO 2.0 G*
- BJ *
-- r F6-cNo.,
L
Table A - Administrative Changes Section 3.0 - LCO ApplicabilitylSR Applicability (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
A3.0-00 A3.0-01 1A3.0-02 A3.0-04 A3.0-09 A3.0-12 A3.0-1 3
_______________________________i ITS Section cTS Section summary W%0%01__
1 I.
I A3.0-17 Clarifies CTS requirements and limitations that the SRs shall be meet during the MODES or Other Specified Conditions in the Applicability for which the requirements of the LCO apply. This change does not impose any new requirements and is consistent with current practice at the PI plant.
LC 3..1 L-- 3.O.A LCO 3.0.1, 3.0.2, and 3.0.3 LCO 3.0.3 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Rewords and restates CTS phraseology for LCUs 3.0.A, 3.0.B, and 3.0.C. These changes include 1) using standard MODES of Operation such as MODE 1 and etc. instead of POWER OPERATIONS, 2) dividing LCO 3.0.A into two separated LCOs; and 3) listing those specific LCOs providing exemptions to the applicable LCO. The CTS requirements are basically the same in ITS 3.0 Specifications.
Clarifies CTS requirements for Completion Times to state the total time from when the Condition was first entered and use the MODE number. CTS and ITS Completion Times are the same. Any differences are addressed in a separate Discussion of Change.
Clarifies that ITS 3.0.3 only applies in MODES 1, 2,3, and 4 which is consistent with the intent of CTS.
Clarifies CTS relationship between Technical Specification and non-Technical Specification systems which support ITS.
Clarifies CTS intent for the application of test exception LCOs for the purpose of performing PHYSICS TESTING. This change does alter any plant operations or technical requirements.
Clarifies and formalizes the use of the P1 ITS for two units.
LCO 3.0 LCO 3.0 and LCO 3.0.A, 3.0.B, 3.0.C, 3.0.C.1, and 3.0.C.2 LCO 3.0.C.1 and 3.0.C.2 LCO 3.0.7 NA LCO 3.0.9 NA 1
Prairie Island ITS ITS Section LCO 3.0.8
ýLC 3.01 ILC 4.0
-F.
SCTS Section I--- -,-
14.0-LCcO 3.03 3..
I
Table A - Administrative Changes Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Rewords CTS requirements deferring entry into Required Actions. ITS wording allows delaying A
.I
,, Ar-TIrOtNS These han es are off-DOC No.
A3.0-1 8 Prairie Island ITS declaration that the LCO is not met rather man oelaying u ny ue,-i-,,.
setting considerations and the intent remains the same.
2 Summ'ary
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DCoSurnmfry ITS Section CTS Section DO Noj
.I I '
I 1
1 1
Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS Ml DES of APPLICABILITY. The plant MODES to which this specification apply have not changed.
IDid not include meaningless CTS statement resulting from the new ITS format. No new limits are added to the ITS and the CTS limits are stated in the ITS.
Did not include meaningless CTS statements which are not contained in the ITS. This change does not affect any operating limits or conditions.
Did not include duplicative CTS NRC reporting requirements which are also outlined and submitted in accordance with 10CFR50.72 and 10CFR50.73.
Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements. ITS administratively incorporates these statements within each specification, the plant design features, or systems to which it applies.
These statements have been administratively incorporated, into the ITS, describing plant design features or systems since they do not establish any regulatory or operational requirements.
LCO 3.1.3, LCO 3.1.3, Conditions A and B, LCO 3.1.1, and 3.1.5 INA
- r.
-i NA NA LCO 3.10 and ILC.1
.B1R ILCO
- 3.
1.F.
3.10, SR 4.9, Table 4.1-2A and Table 4.1 1C LCO 3.1.F.1, 3.1.F.3.a, 3.10.A.1, and 3.10.D.1 LCO 3.1.F.1 LCO 3.1.F.1 and 3.1.F.3.a LCO 3.1.F.3.a LC0 3. 1.Fý.3. c LCO 3.10 and SR 4.9 1
A3.1 -01 A3.1-02 A3.1-06 A3.1 -05 A3.1-12 A3.1-34 Prairie Island ITS A3.1 -00 Restates CTS requirements for declaring a misaligned rod inoperable, however, both require verifying NA LCO 3.1 0.E.2 SDM, taking remedial action, and allowing the plant to continue to operate. This paragraph does not have any net change on plant operations under ITS requirements.
INA INA NA INA I
i i-
-- F.
-r
-I..
-- T.,
11
-T.-..-
h V
- V@ I IV
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Sv:ction 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (I, )C No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
I I
A3.1-36 iA3.1-48 A3.1-52 A3.1-54 A3.1-57 DOCNo.-.
SUmary 5-.
5--.-.-
Clarifies CTS operating practices allowing for Separate Condition Entry for each inoperable rod position indicator and demand position indicator.
Replaces the CTS requirement which declare a misaligned rod inoperable'with the ITS requirement of declaring the rod as being misaligned. For either case, the plant would continue to operate, thus the change does not impact plant operations.
Rewords CTS requirements for when a rod is trippable but not movable, verifying that the rod position is within insertion limits to the ITS wording of verification that the rod alignment is within limits. This wording change does not change the impact on plant operations.
Rewords CTS Action Statement from one or more inoperable rods to one or more misaligned rods. This change does not affect plant operations or any technical requirements.
IRewords CTS terminology "loss of stationary gripper coil voltage" with "beginning of decay of stationary gripper coil voltage. This terminology does not change the SR performance and clarifies CTS intent.
ITS section CTS Section ILCO 3.1.7 tLCO 3.10.F LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.1O.G.5 CLCO 3.1.4, Condition A LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.1O.G.6 Condition A r v,
-¶ SR 3.1.4.3 LCO 3.1O.H "CLCO
- ndtin, Condit~io~nD 2
Prnirm Ilcdnd ITS ILECO 3.0fl-.-G-. 6-LO3.10.G.5 ILCO 3.10.H ISR 3.1.4.3
-Y i
-,t-
--r
--t i.
ILCO 3.1 O.G.5
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
-
-7 LCO 3.2 LCO 3.10 sUdmeary Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS section. These statements only provided general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.
A3.2-03 IReplaces CTS symbols for hot channel factors with symbols consistent With ISTS.
Did not include CTS Unit 1, Cycle 19 specific requirements which are no longer applicable.
Did not include CTS SR phrase "whichever occurs first* since all SRs are required to be performed regardless of which condition occurs first.
Clarifies CTS by adding a Note to reverify that Fwq is within limits which is consistent with the intent of the CTS.
LCO 3.2 LCO 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 NA CTS Section LCO 3.10 and Table 3.5.2.AI LCO 3.10.B.1, LCO 3.10.B.1 3.10.B.2, 3.10.B.3(a),
3.1 0.B.3(b),
3.10.B.3(d)1, and 3.10.B.3(d)2 LCO 3.10.B.1, 3.10.B.3(d),
and 3.11 r
SR 3.2.1.2, S§R -3.2.1.2, 3.2.1.1, 3.2.2.1, and 3.2.2.2 SR 3.2.1.2 I LCO I
when
!h
___withaoreprecise A3.2-23 Restates CTS descriptions of when the specification is applicable with a more precise lity LCO 3.2.3 defined as MODE 1 with power > 15% RTP which consistent with the intent of CTS.
C1O 3.1 L00o 3.10-I Prairie Island ITS A3.2-05
.3.2-06 A3.2-22 II I- --
I I
1.
Is rr% n 4ew n n
-F, DOC No.
A3.2-00
.A3.2-01
ýLCO 3.2 ILCO 3.10 ILCO 3.2
ýLC,; 3.1U..2I*.
ISR 3.2.1.2
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
I
-- I Summary I.Restates CTS requirement that the AFD is outside the target band when two or more operable excore channels indicate it is outside the target band for all power levels.
Rewords CTS Action Statement to more accurately define the ranges of applicability when there is a deviation between the AFD and Target Band. This change does not make any substantive changes in plant operation.
Clarifies CTS Note allowing for extending the time the indicated AFD may deviate from the Target Band without penalty deviation time during the incore/excore calibration.
Clarifies CTS by using a more precise Applicability Statement which requires QPTR limits to be met in MODE 1 with the power > 50%.
Did not incorporate CTS requirements to "correct" the QUADRANT POWER TILT RATIO (OPTR) if not within limits because restoring a limit is always an option.
IClarifies CTS by adding a note stating that other means of determining QPTR can be one or more excore nuclear channel inputs inoperable.
LCO 3.2.3 ILCO 3.10.B.4.
4 -
O-3.10.8.
LCO 3.2.3 LCO LCO 3.2.3 1 LCO 3.10.B.A, 3.10.B.5, and 3.10. B.6 LCO 3.1 0.B.5 and 3.10.B.6I LCO 3.10.B.6(a)
L-C-O 3.2.4--- iLCO 3.10.C.1 A3.2-26 A3.2-27 A3.2-33 A3.2-37 A3.2-38 A3.2-58 3.10.C.la SR 3.2.4.2 LCO 3.10.C.4 2
Prairie Island ITS DOC No.
NA LCO CTS Section INA
-I
- 1.
- - --I -.
I ITS Section ILCO 3.2.3 IL-CO 3.2.3
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) eformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance Alicability and Objective statements. ITS administrative ecification, the plant design features, or systems to wh ministratively incorporated, in the ITS, describing plant tablish any regulatory or operational requirements.
Sto another section.
nt with ISTS.
o "Required Channels" to be consistent with the ISTS.
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
summary ITS Section CTS Section Table 3.3.1-1. iTables 3.5-Replaces specific CTS references win iTi references.
Deletes CTS general collective titles of the applicable modes. The applicable Modes are specifically defined in the Table and do not need to be described in the function title.
Clarifies CTS requirements for the time delay and time range for the degraded voltage DG start time delay.
Reformatted CTS including the RTBs have been included in a Table Function named Reactor Trip 1Breakers instead of their own separate Function.
A3.3-18 IReformatted CTS Action Statements to be consistent with ISTS.
Fu 1 thýru 19, and 3.3.2-1, FU 1 thru 9 r...e.3.3.1-1 ra. 35 Table 3.3.1-1, FU 5 SR 3.3.4.3 Table 3.5-1 I Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A Table 3.3.1 -1, FU 17, and Note h
-4 LCO 3.3.1, Table 3.5-2A, LCO 3.3.1, Cond B, C, D,E, F, H, J, K, L, M, N,0, and Note 1, LCO 3.3.2, Cond B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K 2',a Tale 3.5-1 2B, and Table 3.15-1
'table 3.5-2A Function 6 and Table 4.1-1A Function 6 Table 3.5-1 Function 10 Table 3.5-2A Functions 19 and 20 Note (d) and Table 4.1-1 A Functions 19 and 20, Notes 15 and 16 Table 3.5-2A, Actions 1, 4, 5,6,7,8,11, and 33 and Table 3.5-28 Actions A, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29,1 30, 31, 32,
2-------
Prairie Island ITS f
A3.3-07 A3.3-08 A3.3-09 A3.3-1 4 ISR 3.3.4.3
-I_
--- I::
I.
-1
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOc No.
Summary ITS Section CTS Section I.34 lnd3 Cond A, B, and C A3.3-19 IRevises CTS title for reactor trip system consistent with ISTS by deleting "and Interkck".
ITabte 3.3.1-1.
Table 3.3.1-1, FU 19 1
1 LCO 3.3.1, Replaces CTS Action Statements Mode Titles with equivalent Mode numbers. In addition, the Completion Times have been reformatted to require actions in total hours instead of specific increments. The overall times have not changed.
Did not include CTS statement that the IRNIs channel be restored to OPERABLE prior to increasing power above P-6. This requirement is included in ITS LCO 3.0. 4, which provides the same restriction.
Replaces specific CTS terminology "unblocked" with "blocked" when describing the reactor trip interlocks.
- -I. Table 3.3.1-1, LCQ 2.3.8.1, A3.3-29 Reformats CTS presentation of shutdown tracks consistent with ISTS format.
LCO 3.3.1, Cond B, M, 0, and P and LCO 3.3.2, Cond B, C, F, and G LCO 3.0.4 and LCO 3
.0.4 an LCO 3.3.1 Cond F Table 3.3.1 -1, FU 16, 16.b.2, 16.d, and 16.e.
LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5-2A LCO 3.3.11 Cond B, M, N, 0, and P, LCO 3.3.2, Cond B, C, F, and G Table 3.5-2A Table 3.5-2A Function 18 and Table 4.1 1A Function 18 Table 3.5-2A, Action 1,7, 9, and 10, and Table 3.5-2B, Action 20, 23, 25, 27, and 28 Table 3.5-2A IAction 3 LCO 2.3.B.1, 2.3.B.2, 2.3.B.4, and 2.3.B.5 Table 3.5-2A Actions 1, 7, 8, 9, and 10 and Table 3.5 2B Actions 20, 23, 25, and 28 Prairie Island ITS A3.3-21 A3.3-23 FA3.3-28 3
I-1-1 11
-,r IN
--l:
-I ý.
11 1.
Icillu 00
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (1) )C No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
Summary ITS Section CTS Section
...1,..
ifn' h PF*A3l: l nrinrtn nlacinn in service SR 3.3.1.4 Table 3.5-2A ceform atted CTS requirem entsTforSinoperableH It,.D e,
u rt:
.,,....,.....U..
t---------
1 Table 3.3.2-1, A3.3'-35 Revises CTS title, "Automatic Actuation Relay Logic" to more accurately reflect PI design.
Reformats OTS Note to be consistent with ISTS meaning that the function is not required below 2000 psig in the RCS.
Reformats CTS Note consistent with ISTS requiring the function of CVI OPERABLE during containment integrity and movement of irradiated fuel.
Table 3.3.2-1, FU 2, 2b, 3b, 4b, and 5b Table 3.3.5-1 Table 3.3.2-1, Note a Table 3.3.5-1, Table 3.3.5-1, Notes a, b, and Applicability I
Table 3.3.2-1 A3.3-43 Reformats CTS Note restating the Applicability for when both MSIVs are closed.
Revises CTS Function Title deleting "4.16 kV" since it is redundant information.
Table 3.3.2-1 Note c U
able6.3.2-1, FU 6 Table 3.5-2B Table 3.5-213 Functions le, 2c, 3.e, 4.f, 5e, 6d, and 7f Table 4.1-1B FU le, 2c, 3c, 4f, 5e, 6d, and 7f.
Table 3.5-2B note a and Table 4.1-1B Note 21 Table.5-2B -
Table 3.5-213 Note b and Table 4.1-1B Note 26 rable 3.5-2B Table 3.5-213 note c and Table 4.1-1B Note 23.
FTableu.t-2 Function 7 Prairie Island ITS 1A3.3-34 A3.3-38 A3.3-39 A3.3-7 4
I I-
-t; I-r-t-i-n n
n 4
I-r-La-n r
on Action 10 Nýo~t eT '1
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
_____________________________I ITS Section CTS Section Summary IC.
I Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B Clarifies CTS with wording consistent wire1,,
J.
Revised CTS consistent with LAR entitled, "Removal of Boric Acid Storage Tanks from the Safety Injection System."
Reformats CTS requirements from being subdivided into the turbine driven AFW and the motor driven AFW.
Footnote and Table 4.1 -1 BI NAlTable 3.5-28 rable 3.3.2-1, FU 6e Function 9 Action 34, 35, and 36 Table 3.5-26 and Table 4.1-1B Function 7d A3.3-48 A3.3-50 A3.3-51 A3.3-54 A3.3-55 Did not include CTS statement allowing one channel to be bypassed for up to 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> for surveillance testing since this is included with the AFW logic testing.
LCO 3.3.1, LCO 3.3.1n Condition I LCO 3.3.3 A3.3-62 IDid not include CTS specific Objective statements which did not provide any technical requirements.
A3.3-63 IRestates CTS requirements allowing the plant to start up with inoperable EM equipment.
IA3.3-65 IRestates CTS using ISTS descriptive terminology "Penetration Flow Path."
LCO 3.3.3, LCO 3.15.C LCO 3.3.3, Actions 3.3.3-1, Table 3.5-213, Action 30 LCO 3.15 Table 3.15-1 Table 3.15-1 Function 9 5
nOC No.
Restates CTS required actions for systems normally blind flanged and not operating.
'Table 3 5-2B, Rds Cond B and C jAction 22 Table 3.3.3-1, FU 9 n..,,lclnnrl IT.R CTS SectionI-I I
17-i- ---
I IITS Section iNote G,-
I -
ILCO 3.3.3 ILCO 3.15.C
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
T ab!
3.q."41-1. T ahle3.R 1 R 1 Did not include unnecessary CTS descriptive verbiage.
FU 15 and Table 3.3.3, Note c A3.3-68 tClarifies CTS adding a Note in the EM Table that each core exit thermocouple is a channel.
Clarifies CTS by providing a direction for operators to follow if they do not comply with specific Completion Times.
Did not include CTS column title of Functional Test since this test has been replaced by other tests i.e.,
TADOT, COT, or ALT.
Table 3.3.1-1..A Table 3.3.1 -1 Note c LCO 3.3.3, Cond H rable 3.3.1-1, rable 4.1-lA, FU 1 thru 19 I-..
-
A3.3-75
=Restate UTS requirements for SRs for the calibration of the Power Range Neutron Flux High Setpoint.
Clarifies CTS requirements that setpoint verification is not required for the quarterly SR of the 4 kV RCP Bus undervoltage and underfrequency.
Clarifies CTS requirements for response time testing of the automatic trip logic and reactor trip breakers.
IDid not include CTS format for Frequency notations not included in the ISTS.
T able 3.3:.1-1, FU 6, 7, and 20 Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-lA Table 3.3.1-1, IFU 11 and 12 Table 3.3.1 -1, FU 17 and 19 SLCO 3.3 Actionnd 16t and 16 Note c NA NA--
Table 4.1 -1 A, FU 1 thrt 20 and 4.1-1B, and 4.1-1C Table 4.1-iA Functions 2a, 7, and 8.
Table 4.1 -1 A Functions 15 and 16b Table 4.1-lA Table 4.1 -1 A Functions 18 and 19 Table 4.1-1A, Table 4.1-lB and Table 4.1 1C 6
Prairie Island ITS A3.3-66 A3.3-69 A3.3-72 A3.3-81 A3.3-84 A3.3-85 I-1;
-T r
i
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
SNo SummarTSSection CTS Section DOC No.I:
u mary
- 4. ---
Did not include unnecessary CTS descriptive wording.
Non..e.1.1 1, Note A3.3-95 IRestates CTS requirements for STAGGERED TEST BASIS consistent with ISTS.
bli iJ.1.4, I aaie '4.1-lA I SR3.3.1.4, 3.3.1.5, and 3.3.2.2 ITable 4.1l-1A Note 9 and Table 4.1-1B Note 22 T NA rable 4.1-lB A3.3-107 Did not include OTS Note referencing a specific Specification since it is no longer applicable.
+ SF1 3.3.2.4, NA A3.3-109 Clarifies CTS by adding a Note requiring verification of the setpoint is not required by this SR.
SR 3.3.2.4, Note
-I NA A3.3-114 Incorporated LAR, "Removal of Boric Acid" into the CTS.
I--NA A3.3-123 Did not include CTS Notes due to ISTS format.
r-T.
A3.3-126 IRestates CTS references for TS 3.11 to ITS 3.2.4.2.
____________________1
laDle J1-1, anie J.b-A A3.3-128 IReplaces CTS designation of channel for SI input, trip, and RTBs with train designation.
LCO 3.3.1, Cond D Table 3.3.1-1, FU 15,17, and 19 Table 4.1-1B Note 25 Table 4.1-10 Table 4.1 -1 C Functions 5, 7, 9 and 12 and Note 33 Table 4.1-1C Notes 35, 36, and 37 T able 3.5-2A Function 17, 18 and 19 Prairie Island ITS A3.3-94 7
I t, ri
% n 4
A I-r-9.1-A 4 4 A
^
IKIA IkIA F
^
^
A A
I-T m
L 1-
^
A Note 7li.1 r
ýIA INA INA INA
ýLCO 3.10O.C.4I
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
summary"ITSSection CTS Section DOC No.Ah Q~
~al
.31-.ILO23...
Revises the CTS definition of the nomenclature and the values Tor f (AI) consistenit wni.i moo.
Restates CTS requirements that undervoltage is a percentage of normal voltage to undervoltage is a percentage of rated bus voltage.
Clarifies CTS instrumentation ranges for measuring high pressurizer water level and low low steam generator water level which are specified as a percentage of narrow range.
Restates CTS SR that a COT be performed on intermediate range and source range neutron instrumentation prior to reactor startup following each shutdown in excess of 2 days. The ITS requires the same SR Frequency only specified as 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> instead of a 2 days.
Clarifies CTS applicability by specifically stating that once the plant is in Mode 3, the MSIVs can be shut thus exiting the Mode of Applicability which is consistent with ISTS.
Clarifies CTS requirements that the neutron detectors are excluded from CHANNEL CALIBRATION.
This is consistent with current PI practices and ISTS requirements.
I u6,u No.t. 1
- 1, FU 6, Note 1 Table 3.3.1-1, LCO 2.3.A.2.g Tfable 3i.3.A-1 -1 FU 1la and l1b Table.
.3.-1 LC FTable 3.3.1-1,
-FU 9 and 13
H 3.3.1.B LCO 3.3.2, LCO 3.3.2, Condition G SR---
3..31 Table4..1-10 SR 3.3.3.1, 3.3.3.2, and LCO 3.3.5 I
5.b.ti, LUO A3.3-144 Restates CTS requirements for submitting a report to the NRC.
3.3.3, Cond C and J
-I I.
LUU ii.b, I aDle 1.b-b, Clarifies CTS requirements ensuring that with one or more trains of radiation monitoring inoperable, operation may continue provided that the containment inservice purge supply and exhaust valves are closed.
LGon 3.3.5, and 2.3.A.2.e LCO 2.3.A.3.a and 2.3.A.3.b rale
.1-lA Table 4.1-1A Notation 4 Table 3.5-2B Tacte 3.5-2B Action 25 Table 4.1 -1 C Footnote 41 and FU 23 T ab:le 3.15 Action (a)l and 3 able 3.t-n2B, Action 22 T.
T.
WO 3.3.5 LUU 3AiU.Z.C A3.3-147 IReformats CTS requirements for CVI instrumentation.
8 Prairie Island ITS A3.3-130 A3.3-133 A3.3-134 A3.3-141 iA3.3-142 A3.3-1 43 A3.3-146
ýCond A and B ILCO 3.3.5 ILCO 3.6.D.2.cI-i
- 1. -"ý
^
^
A ^
11
-14 1-1 11 I
I-
--T-l 1ý -
I Or%
I-r-L n -@ ff 11AA~%
n n
n re nn LCO 2.3.A.2.gI-1
ýSH 3.3.1.8
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOCt4o.
A3.3-148
.Summary" I
t
-te Restates CTS actions requiring that with one or more inservice purge Functions inoperable, enter applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.6.3 for containment inservice purge valves made inoperable by isolation instrumentation.
A3.3-'149 IReformatted CTS consistent with ISTS wording.
Clarifies CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that separate condition entry is allowed for each Function. This is consistent with PI current intent.
Clarifies CTS intent that if the automatic load sequencers are inoperable, specific actions are required to be taken.
A3.3-155 IClarifies CTS requirements that the neutron detectors are excluded from response time testing.
___________________1 Table 3.5-2B, LCO 3.3.4n Condition A LCO 3.3.4 Table 3.5-2B, Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.3.1 -1, FU 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 5, 6, and 7 SR 3.3.1.16, Note r
Eliminates CTS requirements allowing two channels of power range instrumentation to be taken out of ILCO:I service since the ISTS incorporates this allowance generically.
CTS Section ILCO 3.3.5.
iLCO 3.6.D.2.c LCO 3.3.5 and ILCO 3.8.A.1.1 pLCO 3.3.5andbLt O 3.8.A.1 Table 3.5-2B, Function 8.
Table 3.5-2B, Function 8 Table 4.1-1A Functions 2a, 2b, 3a, 5, 6, and 7 able 3.5-o2A, Action 2d 9
Prairie Island ITS A3.3-150
[A3.3-151 A3.4-1-58 3.1.8 a
--- F I. -,
- k.
I Fr
- I ^
I-r-L.1-
^
ý n
dl Condition B jApplicability ILCO 3.3.4
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4-Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
SUmmrny
.
Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS section.
These statements only provide general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.
Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The plant Modes to which this specification apply have not changed.
ITS Section LCO 3.4 LCO 3.1 and 4.3 LCO 3.4 ILCO 3.4 I T eto LCO 3.1,3.3.
LCO 3.1, 3.3, 3.10, Table 4.1 2A, Table 4.1-2B, Table 4.1-1C, 4.3 and 4.6 A3.4-00 A3.4-03 A3.4-08 I
1 Prairie Island ITS LCO 3.1 and 4.3 3.1.A.l.b(1),
3.1.A.1.b (2),
3.1.A.l.c(1),
3.1.A.1.c(3),
3.1.A.1.d, 3.1.A.2.a(1),
3.1.A.2.a(2),
3.1.A.2.a(3),
3.1.A.2.b(1),
3.1.A.2.c(1),
3.1.A.2.c(1)(a),
3.1.A.2.c(1)(b),
3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)3, 3.1.B.1.b, 3.1.C.1, 3.1.C.2, 3.1.C.2.d, 3.1.C.3, 3.1.D.2, 3.1.D.2.a, 3.1.D.2.b, 3.10.J and 4.3.
F IF ILCO 3.4 It I I T. --
-r ICTS Section LCO 3.4
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4-Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
=.
summary I
I.
INA ILCO 3.1.A.1.b(2),
Did not include CTS statement that "STARTUP OPERATION which is duplicative to ITS general rules for use and applicability governing how the plant may operate. Among these rules is Specification 3.0.4 which, unless specifically excepted, does rnat allow the plant to startup with inoperable TS required equipment.
A3.4-18 Did not include CTS actions which are defined by the format of ITS.
A3.4-22 IDid not include CTS requirements for the plant to shut down which are provided by ITS format.
Divides CTS Specification requiring two methods of cooling the RCS to be operable with one in operation when in MODE 4 and MODE 5, loops filled into two separate Specifications.
Revises CTS format to be consistent with the ITS. The format for CTS and ITS fundamentally differ in the presentation of shutdown tracks but the Completion Time requirements are the same.
Incorporates CTS allowance for pressurizer safety valves to be 2485 psig +/-:3% when tested for operability.
ITS Section NA NA LCO 3.1.A.l.b(3)
L003.4.3, LCO 3.1.A.2.a(2).
LCO 3.4.3,L LCO 3.4.9, Conditions A, B, and C, LCO 3.4.11, Conditions D, E, and G, LCO 3.4.14, Conditions B, C, and D, and LCO 3.4.15
- INA ILCO3.1.A.1.b(2),
3.1.A.2.a(2),
3.1.A.2.b(1) and 3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)
LCO 3.1.A.2.a(2).
3.1.A.2.a(3),
3.1.A.2.c.(1,(b)(1),
3.1.A.2.c.(1)(b)(3),
3.1.B.1.b and 3.1.C.2 LCO 3.4.10 ILCO 3.1.A.2.b (1) 2 Prairie Island ITS A3.4-14 A3.4-28 A3.4-39 FA3.4-46 FDO-C No.]
V I
-1. -
I -.
-T; CTS Section I.-
INA
ýLCO 3.1.A.1.b(3)
ýLCO 3.1.A.1.b(3)
INA LC 0 -3.-4-.-7 LC O 3.1.A.l.
-c LCO 3.4.10 ILCO 3.1.A.2.b (1)
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4-Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
A3.4-49 D
A3.4-61 F
[A3.4-71 A3.4-73 A3.4-77 A3.4-78 A3.4-83 Sufnrfiry Did not include CTS required action since it is included based on ITS format.
I Revises CTS requirements for maintaining RCS pressure and temperature limits by dividing them into L two sets of action statements. This change also includes changing to the NUREG-1431 use of MODES to define plant conditions rather than use of prose descriptions. These are editorial and format changes and do not change PI operating practices or intent.
Clarifies CTS requirements to immediately enter into LCO 3.0.3, which is the appropriate action if no leakage detection instrumentation is OPERABLE. This is consistent with current PI practices.
Clarifies CTS LEAKAGE requirements making it consistent with the ITS definition of LEAKAGE. This I1 change is consistent with PI current operating practices.
Did not include CTS requirements since it is included in the ITS format.
Revises CTS requirements for inservice steam generator tube inspection to include iH ITS Section 5.5. 3 No technical changes are associated with this change.
Clarifies CTS Applicability to be consistent with the ITS format.
ITS Section I T eto LCO 3.1.A.2.c LCO 3.1.A.2.c (1)(b)(1),
3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)(3),
3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)(4),
and 3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)(5)
_CO 3.4.3 ILCO 3.1.B.1.b LCO 3.4.16 Lco 3.1.C.1 and 3.1.C.2.d C03.-1,iLO31C2a LCO 3.4.14, ILCO 3.1.C.2.a Conditions A and C
ýNA iLCO 3.1.C.2.d 3.414 LCD-3.1- -.-
e 3.4.14 Condition and SR 3.4.14.2 D land SR 4.12 LC.3..1 ILC33A3ad LCO 3.4.12 LCO 3.3.A.3 and and 3.4.13 3.3.A.4 3
Prairie Island ITS I.A.I.
nrltt nn iD land SR 4.12 C
r-t.
CTS Section INA I-ILCO 3.1.C.2.e
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4-Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
Summary ITSh ectionI CTS Section i
T SR 3.4.1.4 LCO 3.10.J I
LCO 3.4.6 LCO 3.4.11 Revises CTS SR Frequency general statement from prior to resuming power after each refueling to every 24 months.
Clarifies CTS requirements for RCS total flow rate. Only editorial changes were made and no parameter, technical or operational changes made.
Replaces CTS statement, "whenever the reactor coolant system average temperature is below 350 F" with the ITS equivalency of MODE 4. The temperature limit of 350 F in the CTS is the same as ITS Mode 4.
Replaces CTS statement, "whenever the reactor coolant system average temperature is below 350 F" with the ITS equivalency of MODE 5 with RCS loops filled. The temperature limit of below 350 F in the CTS is enveloped in the ITS Mode 5 with RCS loops filled.
Editorially revises CTS action statement for only one OPERABLE method of removing decay heat. The actions are the same in both CTS and ITS.
Editorially revises CTS shutdown requirements with one method of decay heat removal inoperable.
The Actions and Completion Times In both the CTS and ITS are the same, no technical or operational changes have been made to this requirement.
Editorially revises CTS requirement with no methods of removing decay heat. CTS and ITS actions and Completion Times remain the same.
Editorially revises CTS requirements for defining the acceptable methods for removing decay heat.
CTS and ITS allow the use of the same decay heat removal system or a combination of the two to meet the LCO requirements.
LCO 3.4.12 and 3.4.13 LCO 3.1.A.l.c (1)
LCO3.1.A.1.c (1)
LCO 3.1.A. i.c (2)
I
-*--:--
LCO 3.4.12 LCO 3.4.12 and 3.4.1'3" A3.4-100 A3.4-102 A3.4-103 A3.4-104 A3.4-105 A3.4-106 FA3.4-107 LCO 3.4.11 LCO 3.1.A.1.c (1) 4 Prairie Island ITS A3.4-99 LCO 3.4.13 LCO 3.1.A.1.c (3)
ILCO 3.1.A. i.c (2)
LCU 3:. 1.,A.1.C (2)1 rLCO -3.1
.A.1.c -(3)-
ýLCO 3.4.13 ILCO 3.4.11 ILCO 3.1.A.l.c (1)
ISR 3.4.15.1 ISR 4.3 LCO 3.4.12 1.
-t-
, 11 f-t-N -3 4 A
4 101%
11
-T. -__
ý --
r1 11 11 1%
.lI%.".......
1 ISR 3.4.1.4 LCO 3.10O.J ILCO 3.4.6
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4-Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
P 1
) No.
Summary ITS Section Ap
.CO 3.4.11 CTS Section LCO 3.1.A.2.c (1) and 3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)(4)
(C1 31(.bA.2.c (1)(b)(5)
SR3.4.14.1]Table 4.1-2A Item
ý3.4-110 Clarifies intent of CTS requirements by adding a note stating that the Required Actions do not have to L be entered if sole reason for the block valves being declared inoperable is a result of power being removed to comply with other Required Actions. No operational or technical changes are associated with this change.
6.4-111 Clarifies intent of CTS requirements by adding a Note that with both block valves inoperable, restore L
one block valve to OPERABLE status within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, if sole reason for the block valves being declared inoperable is a result of power being removed to comply with other Required Actions. No operational or technical changes are associated with this change.
43.4-112 Clarifies CTS requirements that the Primary System Leakage be evaluated daily, but not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after establishment of steady state operation. Performance of this SR at steady state conditions is standard PI operating practice and consistent with the intent of the CTS.
A3.4-113 Clarifies CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that the SR is to be performed in MODES 1 and 2 for the Pressurizer PORV Block. Performance of this SR in MODE 3 is standard PI operating practice and consistent with the intent of the CTS.
A3.4-114 Clarifies CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that the SR is to be performed in MODES 1 and 2 to functionally test the PORVs. Performance of this SR in MODE 3 is standard PI operating practice and consistent with the intent of the CTS.
A3.4-120 Editorially revises CTS requirements that two methods of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when the reactor is in MODE 5. With only one OPERABLE method of removing decay heat, initiate prompt action to restore two OPERABLE methods of removing decay heat. The ITS requires two loops of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when the reactor is in MODE 5. With one required loop inoperable and one RHR loop OPERABLE, immediately initiate action to restore a second loop to OPERABLE status. Since the only changes were editorial, the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are the same and no technical changes or operating practices were changed.
Table 4.1-2A Item 6
SR 3.4.11.2 Table 4.1-2A Item LCO3.4.11 LCO 3.1.A.1.c (2)
LCO 3.4.11 lad 3.4.12 5
Prairie Island ITS SR 3.4.11.1 i
1 fýr%
03 A I 1 1
19 17 ILCO 3.1.A.l.c (2)1
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4-Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
ITS Section Il
'ill~
~
~
I ummary Editorially revises CTS requirements for two methods of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when the I reactor is in MODE 5. These changes were editorial; the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are the same and no technical changes or operating practices were changed.
Editoriall revises CTS Required Actions with no methods of removing decay heat. These changes 1
.were editorial the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are the same and no technical changes or operating practices were changed.
rEditorially revises CTS requirement by combining-the SR and Footnote and replacing power operation with MODE 1.
Editorially revises CTS requirement for performing this SR at reactor power with MODE 1.
Did not include CTS requirements that reactor vessel head be removed. This flexibility exits the specification Applicability as defined in ITS.
Eliminated CTS wording allowing returning PIV to service to perform testing. This is included in ITS I
LCO 3.0.5 LCO 3.4.11 and 3.4.12 CTS Section LCO 3.4.13 ILCO 3.1.A.l.c (3)
SR 3.4.17.3 Table 4.1-2B Item SR 3.4.17.2 Table 4.1-2B Item 2
NA iLCO 3.3.A.3(b)
Dir~ir lqlqnrd ITS A3.4-121 A3.4-122 A3.4-124 r.3.4-125 A3.4-1 27 A3.4-132 I
-L I
1 1.ILCO 3.1.A.1.c (2)1 13
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOCNo._______"________SectionICTS SScctio J
"Summary
. i cto CTS Section Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Revises specific CTS details of RWST OPERABILITY requirements for volume and boron concentration to an SR.
Revises CTS details for the ECCS Accumulators OPERABILITY requirements for volume, boron concentration, nitrogen cover pressure, and verification that the isolation valves are open to the SRs.
A3.5-07 lReplaces CTS Applicability Statement to exclude MODE 4.
n
..4' Table 4.1-2B, and 4.5
- i. 1 1
.1 TI r-%
n 3A a
-4t, LCO 3.5.2 LCU 3.3.A.1.c
LU ;i.i LLAJ 3.JM..e A3.5-15 IReplaces CTS Action Statement for Accumulator inoperability to exclude boron concentration events.
I I
Clarifies CTS requirements for entering a shutdown track is one ECCS train is inoperable and the other train cannot supply 100% flow.
Incorporates NRC approved LAR entitled, "Removal of Boric Acid Storage Tanks from the Safety Injection System," submitted April 17, 2000.
SR 3.5.4.2 A3.5-22 IDid not include CTS reference to the IST Program using a Specification number with the actual title of NA IST.
LGO LCO 3.3.A.1.a, Table 4.1-2B, 4.5.B.3.a, and 4.5.B.3.c 1
Prairie Island ITS h oltt qn1"1 A3.5-00 A3.5-01 A3.5-04 A3.5-1j7 A3.5-20 ILCU 3.5.'1.
ILC. U.3.A.2Y.eII I S§R 3.5.4.2 SR 4.5.B.1.a ILCO 3.5.2 ILCO 3.3.
1 It I-r%
03 0 4
li t-r%
3 13 A 13 -
-t-L.%a%_1 O.U.C-LCO 3.3,A.1.aI
ýLCO 3.5.4 ILCU 3.5.1
ýLG;U3.3.A.1.b I I ILCO 3.3.A.1.cI--I ILCO 3.5.2
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Slibihnay 1
iTS Section CTS Section DOCNo.I I
___r_
Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS section.
These statements only provided general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.
Revises CTS Specification titles for Safety Injection and Residual Heat Removal System, and ECCS Safety Injection System to ECCS.
A3.5-303 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY.
I LCO 3.5 and LCO 3.3.A, LCO 3.52and SR 3.5.2.51 LCU 3.5.2 LUU 3.3.A.1 S.,wR 4.5 cil l SR 4.5 SR 4.5.B.1.a, and 4.5.B.3.f LnO 3.3.A.1 and 3.3.A.2 I ann-an I, n,.
t1
LUU Replaces CTS OPERABILITY range for accumulator volume and nitrogen cover pressure expressed in terms of a median value plus or minus the allowable variation by the equivalent simple range over which the parameters are acceptable.
Clarifies CTS requirements, "any one of the following conditions of inoperability may exist..." This requirement prevents two or more of the listed conditions from existing at the same time. In the ITS, these conditions may be in more than one specification. The SFDP provides a mechanism to assure that entry into multiple TS Conditions will not result in loss of safety function.
I.
- it-i i
LUU ;s.;jjTe 3.3.A.1.b(3)
I incorporates NRC approved LAR titled, "Increase ECOS Accumulator Allowed Outage Time to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />"~C C
ff-i L-J Clarifies CTS Actions to be taken if both accumulators were inoperable. ITS specifically has a Condition requiring entry into LCO 3.0.3. The CTS would require entry into LCO 3.0.C since there would not be a specific Action Statement for both accumulators being inoperable.
Incorporates both PI specific valve numbers with their associated Westinghouse valve numbers. Both numbers are utilized in the control room.
I' I
~ItIM 4 T LCOU 3.3.A.1.b.(1)
LCO 3.3.A.1.g LCO 3.3.A.1ad (1) and (2) 2 Prairie Island ITS A3.5-301 A3.5-302 A3.5-304 A3.5-306
~A3.5-307 T3.5-309 FA3.5-316 I - m --3 rf 4 -4 11 rf-t I -
- l-I 3.5.1.1 I:SH 3.5.2.1 I
I co.rs,
ILCO.3 a
nd i
-Fv
- 1. --
11 ýý A
-TC-10-03--Cl r3 11 t-n IL%.,%J O.U ILCO 3.5.2 IS 3.5*.,1.2 ISH 3:.5.2 ILGOU 3.3.A.2
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
Summary j ITS Section CTS Section Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1 431. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Replaces general CTS prose descriptions with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The plant Modes to which this specification apply have not been changed.
LCO 3.6 LCO 3.3.8.1, ILCO 3".t 6
3LCO 1.0.Ta 3.3.13, Table TS.3.5-1, 3.6, Table TS.4.1 1C, Table TS.4.1-2B, SR 4.4, and 4.5 LCO 3.3.13.1, 3.3.8.2, 3.6.A.1, 3,6.A.2, 3.6.B.1, 3.6.C.2, 3.6.D.2, 3.6.G, 3.6.H.1, 3.6.1.1.3.6.1.2, 3.6.J.1, 3.6.J.2, 3.6.K.1, 3.6.K.2, 3.6.L.1, 3.6.M.1, 3.6.M.2.c, 3.6.M.3, and Table 4.1-1C Note 39, SR 4.4.G and 4.4.H.
I Prairie Island ITS I.
A3.6-00 A3.6-03 I -%fw%
VI
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summat ISSeio IT eto Lf~
~~
A3.6-05 A3.6-09 1
A3.6-11 A3.6-19 A3.6-22 A3.6-23 A3.6-24 I'
A3.6-26 IClarifies CTS wording which allows a valve to be deactivated when a containment isolation valve is inoperable.
S...
"'"2 I Revise CTS CONTAIMENT INTEGRITY Definition Items 1, 3 and 4 to include in various ITS Specifications and SRs.
Did not include general CTS Applicability and Obj-.ctive statements at the beginning of each CTS section. These statements only provide general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.
Revises CTS wording for defined times for Required Actions. The ITS defines all action times from the time the first initiated action occurs. Thus the ITS is equivalent to the CTS Required Action time.
Clarification of the CTS is provided for guidance for multiple valves in multiple penetrations is provided in an equivalent Note allowing separate Condition entry for each containment flow path.
Clarifies intent of CTS for inoperable or leaking barriers. These provisions are the same as PI current practice therefore these changes are administrative.
Clari
- fies CTS by adding a Note to apply the requirements to those penetrations which do not use a closed system as a barrier.
Clarifies CTS by including the clause, "penetration flow paths with one" to those penetration flow paths with a single inoperable barrier. The Condition for a penetration flow path with two inoperable barriers is addressed separately.
1 CTS Section LCO 3.6.1, 3.6.2, and 3.6.3 NA LCO 3.6 LCO 3.6.3, Note 2 LCO3.6 Notes 3 and 4 Conii 3.6.3, ICondition A Prairie Island ITS 11 1.0 3ONTAIMENT NTEGRITY LCO 3.6,SR 4.4, and 4.5 LCO 3.3.B.2, 3.6.A.2, 3.6.G, 3.6.1.2, 3.6.J.2, 3.6.K.2, 3.6.M.2.c and 3.6.M.3 LCO 3.6.C.1 LCO 3.6.C.1 LCO 3.6.C.3 LCO 3.6.C.3 13.6.C.3.(b)
[LCO 3.6.3 7-1.1---l",--]
I Summar-ITS Section
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summary I
I ITS Section CTS Section A3.6-42 Clarifies CTS stating that entry into LCO 3.6.1 is required if airlock leakage exceeds the Containment LCO 3.6.2 LCO 3.6.M Leakage Rate Test Program acceptance criteria. This is the same action the plant would take under the CTS.
A3.6-48 Clarifies CTS by providing two Notes. These changes are editorial and are consistent with PI operating SR 3.6.2.1 SR 4.4.A.2 practices and technical requirements.
and 4.5.A.2.a A3.6-49 Clarifies intent of CTS actions for two inoperable doors in an air lock if both doors in the same air lock are LCO 3.6.2, LCO 3.6.M.1 inoperable.
Conditions A and B A3.6-54 Clarifies CTS SR Frequency for a functional test of the containment vacuum breakers to be provided SR 3.6.8.1 Table 4.1-1C quarterly consistent with current PI procedures.
Function 10 A3.6-62 Restates CTS requirements for the inservice purge penetration leakage.
A3.6-77 Clarifies CTS requirements by entering a reactor shutdown track per LCO 3.0.C.
LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.D.2.e Conditions D, and E 1..
,-,ff.
A
.- ;.l -;--
Clarifies CTS requirements for testing of containment spray ana spray additive valves. i nese changes do not change the type or number of valves which are tested under CTS.
3 Prairie Island ITS r
DOC No.
A3.6-80 ISR 3.6.6.4 SRH 4.5.B.3,.t.
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
_a_.__
_-_I_
r-nI"t1-1
.U lllllg
'J Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS section.
These statements only provided general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.
Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The plant MODES to which this specification apply have not changed.
'ISt 3
section NA LCO 3.4,3.13, LCO 3 t
I3.u, rLCO 3.3.C, Table TS.3.5 2B, 3.4, 3.6.D, 3.7, 3.7.A.5(a),
3.8.B, 3.13, Table TS.4.1 2A, Table TS.4.1-2B, SR 4.4.8, 4.5, 4.7, 4.8, 4.14, 4.15, and 4.20 LCO 3.4, 3.13, SRs 4.7, 4.8, 4.14, 4.15 and 4.20 LCO 3.7.1, LCO 3.7.1, 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 3.7.7, and 3.7.12 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The LCO 3.7.1 Cond 1 plant MODES to which this specification apply have not changed.
B, 3.7.4 Cond C, 3.7.5 Cond C, 3.7.6 Cond B, 3.7.7 Cond B 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.7.9 Cond D, and 3.7.10 Cond A and C LCO 3.4.A, 3.4.8, 3.4 0.1, 3.3.C.1.a, 3.3.D, 3.E.
and 3.6.F CO 3.4.A.2, 3.4.B.2, 3.3.C.l.b, 3.3.D.2 and 3.13.A.2 1
Prairie Island ITS rA3.7-00 A3.7-01 A3.7-02 rA3.7-04 ISection 3.7 11 uuu no. I
-1
[
Fl Section 3.7
ýIA
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
A3.7-05 A3.7-06 A3.7-09 A3.7-20
- Summary, Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The-plant MODES to which the listed specifications apply have not changed.
Clarifies CTS defined times for required actions from the time a new action is initiated. Thne ITS defines all action times from the time the first initiated action occurs. Thus, the ITS is equivalent to the CTS required action time.
Includes AFW requirements for two units operating in the ITS LCO such that the requirements are the same for each operating unit. Therefore, a separate statement for two unit operation is not required. This change is consistent with the intent of the CTS.
iDivides OTS requirements contained in one specification into separate specifications in the ITS. This Iis consistent with PI operational practices.
ITS SectIon
OTS Section ITS Section CTS Section LCO 3.7.1 Cond B, 3.7.4 Cond C, 3.7.5 Cond C, 3.7.6 Cond B, 3.7.7 Cond B, 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.7.9 Cond D, 3.7.10 Cond A, C, F, 3.7.12 Cond B and C, and 3.7.14 Cond A LCO 3.7.1 Cond B, 3.7.4 Cond C, 3.7.5 Cond C, 3.7.6 Cond B, 3.7.7 Cond B, 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.7.9 Cond D, 3.7.10 Cond F, and 3.7.12 Cond B and C jLCO 3.7.5 LCO 3.7.6 Cond LCO 3.4.8.2 LCO 3.7.6 Cond B
LCO 3.4.A.2, 3.4.B.2, 3.4.D, 3.3.C.1.b, 3.3.D.2, 3.13.A.2 and 3.6.E.1.
LCO 3.4.A.2, 3.4.B.2,,
3.3.C.1.b, 3.3.D.2, 3.13.A.2 and 3.6.E.1.
iLco 3.4.B.1.b 3.7-21 Clarifies CTS requirements for completion of turbine driven AFW pump testing. This is consistent LCO 3.7.5.2 LCO 3.4.B.2.a Awith current PI operating practices.
Note 2
I 1_::
I.I-,,,,,,4ITC*
1--
1 - - - - - -
L. -
v
ir-ILCO 3.4.B.2 I
i
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
-. -
I ITS Section I OTS Section I
.o
-um liua UU O
u.
CO 3.7.8 Cond LCO 3.3.D.2.a LCO 3.7.8 Cond BI LCO 3.7.8 Cond B, 3.0.6, and 5.5.13 A3.7-36 A3.7-44 A3.7-45 A3.7-47 A3.7-57 A3.7-62 A3.7-66 A3.7-74 LCO 3.3.D.2.a 3.3.D.2.a.(1) and (2)
LCo Fi A
of ITS 3.7.17.
LCO 3.7.17 _LC0 3.8.E.1 A3.7-77 Restates CTS title of this specification to be consistent with the titleofT37E 3
Prairie Island ITS it,, ttt rnn Did not include CTS specifications requiring restrictions on single unit or two unit operations. This is I
included in the intent of the ITS and does not change any operational practices.
Restates CTS requirements for safeguards CL pump inoperability to state "No safeguards pumps OPERABLE for one train..." This statement is substantively the same as the CTS requirements with no change in operational practices.
Replaces explicit specific system wording of CTS action requirements with the general ITS requirement LCO 3.0.6 and programmatic ITS requirement 5.5.13, with no technical changes.
Replaces explicit specific system wording of CTS action requirements with the general ITS requirement LCO 3.0.6 and programmatic ITS requirement 5.5.13, with no technical changes.
Clarifies CTS action statements for CRSVS during plant operation (MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4) and irradiated fuel handling operations. This is consistent with PI operating practices.
Restates CTS requirements for Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone Integrity in ITS 3.7.12 requirements for the ABSVS; thus the title of this section is also revised.
R-ewords applicability for fuel handling operations specification, 3.8.B.1.c, by combining this specification with the spent fuel pool boron concentration specification, 3.8.E.2.a, which expands the applicability beyond involving a spent fuel cask containing fuel to state the boron concentration is to be maintained at 1800 ppm at all times when spent fuel is stored in the spent fuel pool, consistent with CTS 3.8.E.2.a.
"Restates Reference to CTS LCO 3.0.C which is equivalent to ITS LCO 3.0.3, as a Reference to L00 3.0.3.
LCO 3.3.D.2.b(1) and (2)
LCO 3.13.A.1 and 3.13.A.2 LCO 3.6.E.1 LCO 3.8.B.1.C and 3.8.E.2.a LCO 3.8.D.4 and 3.8.E.1 IC 3.f~3"7.7 LCO 3.3.C.1 SI CTS ectionI -i
-r.s Se11-cti0on LCO 3.7.8 Cond C, 3.0.6, and 5.5.13 LCO 3.7.10 Cond D and E LCO 3.7.12 Cond B and C LCO 3.7.16 APPLICABILITY LCO 3.7.13 Action Notes, 3.7.16 Cond A, and 3.7.17 Cond A I
V
- Qf I.
I
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) nnI DOCn o.S Summary ITS Section CTS Secton
%F.l--.
A3.7-78 A3.7-83 A3.7-94 A3.7-97 A3.7-105 A3.7-113 Restates CTS title and terminology within this specification to be consistent with the title and terminology in ITS 3.7.16. No technical or operational changes have been made as a result of this change.
Restates CTS requirements for testing MSIV closure time upon receipt of an actuation signal by dividing it into two ITS SRs.
Rewords CTS statement that test shall be performed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of entering power operation.
POWER OPERATION in this context has been defined as MODE 1 in accordance ITS definitions.
Rewords CTS specification with an explicit requirement to verify that each CC system pump starts.
This is consistent with the acceptance criteria PI uses for this test.
Restates CTS requirements to test the auxiliary building normal ventilation system isolation valves with the SR. This change does not result in any operational or technical changes to the CTS.
IRestates CTS Frequency from refueling outage to 24 months. The CTS defines the Frequency for refueling outage as not to exceed 24 months. Therefore, the CTS and ITS are consistent and no technical or operational changes are made.
LCO 3.7.16 and TLCO 3.8.E.2 SR 3.7....
eH 4.A SR 3.7.5.2 and SR 4.8.A.8 SR 3.7.5.2 and 3.7.5.4 Note SR 3.7.7.3 SR 4.5.A.4
-T SR 3.7.12.4 SR 3.7.7.2, SR 3.7.7.2, 3.7.7.3, and 3.7.8.5 2aFncTabie 41 2B Function 131 te 4.8.A.8 INote SR 4.5.A.4 SR 4.5.A.4.a, 4.5.A.5.a, 4.5.B.3.e, 4.5.A.B.3.f.
4 Prairie Island ITS I
I
^
--T--
-- T----
le
-- -T ISR 3.7.16.
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
'. -TS-Section.
a ---
sect.o
.... Summa A3.8-01 A3.8-130 A3.8-15 A3.8-17 LCO 3Sect.on8'IC IO 3ec7aon LCO 3.0.6 and LCO 3.7.B.1 ILCO 3.0.6 and LCO 3.8.1 Cond B and D LCO 3.8.1 LCO 3.0.C LCO 3.8.1 Condition G IL)
L no.II II~
I Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements. ITS administratively incorporates these statements within each specification, the plant design features, or systems to which it applies. These statements have been administratively incorporated, into the ITS, describing plant design features or systems since they do not establish any regulatory or operational requirements.
Did not include CTS requirements for all engineered safety features equipment associated with the OPERABLE DG to be OPERABLE. These requirements are "built in" the format of the ITS and LCO 3.0.6.
Clarifies CTS requirements entering LCO 3.0.C due to the CTS into lack of have any specific Required Actions for the subject Condition. ITS does provide a specific Condition which is to enter LCO 3.0.3.
Reformats various CTS requirements by specifically identifying which Specification (s) apply for various plant conditions.
Reformats CTS to ITS format and verbiage. In addition, ITS implements LCO 3.0.6 (SFDP) which is consistent with current operating practices of Pl.
LCO 3.8 RLCO 3.7 and Prairie Island ITS
____________1
LCO 3.8.1, VAI-IIOUi LCO 3.7.B.1 and 3.7.B.3 1
ILCO 3.0.
S....
OUS LCO 3.7.B I - --
- - -. 0
~rj%
0% -
-A I -
LCO 3.8.1, Condition D I
-1.
[.#A
ý1ý1 1^
AC LCO 3.0.6, 3.8.1 LCO 3.7.B LCO 3.0.6, 3.8.1 Cond F, 3.8.4 Cond D, 3.8.7 Cond C, and 3.8.9 Cond A
ýSR 4.6-
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Coo mar T-"
i ITS Section I CTS Setio*il Fni-n i
- l i
I.
Reformats and clarifies CTS requirements for two reactor protection instrument AC inverters inoperable.
Clarifies CTS by adding a specific Required Action to enter LCO 3.0.3 in the event that two trains with inoperable distribution subsystems result in a loss of safety function. This is consistent with the intent and practices of PI. Since the CTS does not have any specific Actions for this Condition, the plant would enter LCO 3.0.C.
Clarifies CTS requirements for the service building electrical power subsystem components when being used for the safeguards DC electrical power subsystems during a plant outage. This is consistent with current plant procedures plant design, and past operating practices.
Revises CTS fuel oil storage tank level to specify the total available fuel oil quantity. This change provides an accurate description of the PI design.
~Clarifies CTS staiements by stating that only one DG be started at a time. This is current PI operating practices.
LCO 3.8.7i LCO 3.7.B.9 ConditionBA and B
LCO 3.0.3, and LCO 3.0.C LCO 3.0.3, and LCO 3.8.9, Condition E LC..
3.8..
L U l
I-"--
SRe M..~.
bli
.0 19R 3..1.3 Note SR 4.6.A.1 T
NA SR 4.6.A.1.e, A3.8-38 '
Did not include CTS non-pertinent information.
Clarifies OTS by specifically stating the requirements to verify fuel oil properties of new and stored fuel oil. This is consistent with current plant procedures and practices.
A3.8-40 Did not include non-pertinent CTS information by specifically stating that the fuel oil transfer pump is started and operating. If the pump is operating then it has been started.
SR 4.6.A.l.e, 4.6.A.2.c, and 4.6.A.3.b.2 SR 3.8.3.2 SR 4.6.A.I.c NA SR 4.6.A.1.d 2
Prairie Island ITS A3.8-20 A3.8-22 A3.8-23 A3.8-25 A3.8-30 A3.8-39 ISR 4.6.A.1.d INA I UUV M0.1 I
-1 I
ýLCO 3.0.C ILCO 3.7.8 ILCO 3.8.5 ISR 4.6.A.1.b ISR 3.8.3.1 3
ý NA
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) 0 I
-A I
DOC No.
A3.8-51 A3.8-53 A3.8-56 A3.B-57 A3.8-58 A3.8-60 A3.8-62 A3.8-63
,A3.8-68
,"S Section SS ISR 3.8.4.1 biRl4.0..
NA ILCO 3.7.A Did not include non-pertinent CTS information.
Clarifies CTS requirements by replacing the word tested with verify.
Did not include CTS descriptive wording for MODES 1,2,3, and 4.
Clarifies CTS wording requiring determination that the OPERABLE DG is not inoperable due to common cause failure.
Frevises CTS adding specific verbiage to more accurately reflect PI testing of the DGs.
Reformatted CTS SR clarifying voltage and frequency testing requirements.
SClarifies CTIS requirements for the battery discharge test. For batteries during the first refueling and once every 5 years thereafter.
Clarifies CTS that one 4 kW safeguards bus and/or its associated 480V bus including associated MCC may be Inoperable or not fully energized for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> pro sided the 4 kV safeguards bus and its associated 480V safeguards buses are verified to be OPERABLE and the DGs and safeguards equipment associated with the redundant train are OPERABLE.
Clarifies CTS intent by stating that if the'DG fuel oil cannot be restored to within limits, declare the DGs inoperable and enter the applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.7.8.
LCO 3.7.B SRF3.8.1.2 R4.6.A..e SR 3.8.1.6 SR 3.8.6.6 SR 4.6.8.4 SR 4.6.A.2.a LCO 3.8.9 CondLCO 3.7.8.6 AEO3i6ýý~j I
INA LCO 3.n.3,d Condition D 3
Prairie Island ITS LCO 3.8.1 Condition B JA
. I 0%.rg-%
I T.- I A OM..0-A I CTS 5 ectionI -1 S.
- .summiary ISR4.6.A.l.e INA S§R
-3.8.6.6-SR 4.6.6.4
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOCNo.
.Suhmma.
-i,.-
-- nfl"D4 INA ILCO 3.7.B.6.a A3.8-70 Does not include a one time relief for performing modificatuuur-u u.
and b I
----
4 iý,ri, IlnInd ITR I
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
.
I ITS Section OTS Section I Crf n
I able TS.1-1 rA3.9-00 LCO 3.9 LCO 3.8 LCO
- 3.
3.8.AA A.
LjwLlrIll 1CO 3.9 3Table TS.Ia-1.
TS.4.1-2A, and Table TS.4.1-2B FE Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1431.
Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS section. These statements only provide general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.
Revises CTS format such that each specification In the Refueling O)perations Section contains its own Applicability and the CTS specifications are marked up to correspond to these Applicabilities.
Rewords CTS by adding the words "when connected" and "limits are met" clarifying the intent of the CTS.
Clarifies CTS that containment closure requires four bolts required to hold the equipment hatch in place when it is considered closed which is consistent with the CTS.
Restates CTS requirements which allow for at least one isolation valve to be OPERABLE (that is by automatic closure) or locked.
' Rewords CTS requirements for isolation of lines which penetrate containment and provide a direct path from containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere.
A3.9-02 A3.9-03 A3.9-05 W3-.9-06 A3.9-107
__ __ __ __ ___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ I.
- M -Af 12 I A 4 -
P2 A3.9-12 Rewords CTS requirements making minor editorial changes.
I Prairie Island ITS T...
I1---
S......
3.8A lA
. 2 ILCO 3.9.4
- r.
L003.9.4 CT S ection
'*,.ITS Section I
LCO 3.9.4 LCO 38.A.1.a.1 IL-OW%....
ILCO 3.8 ILCO 3.9
ýLCO 3.9 LCO 3.8.A.1 ILCO 3.9.1 I able 1 -1 ILCO 3.9.4 ILCO 3.8.A.1.a.1 LCO 3.8.A.1.a.1 LCO 3.9.4 ILCO 3.8.A.1.a.1 ILCO 3.9.4
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
...b....aflt I
-
tu:'
.< I. ITS Section. I CTS Section nntr Un-b-
a Did not include CTS clause, "following a fuel handling accident in containment" as the basis for requiring an OPERABLE air lock or operating containment fan coil. It is understood that the purpose of this Specification is to mitigate the consequences of a fuel handling accident in containment since that is the regulatory basis for a Refueling Operations LCO.
LCO 3.9 LCO 3.8.A.1.d A3.9-26 IRestates CTS Applicability statements consistent with the ISTS.
Restates CTS applicability of this specification to apply to movement of fuel assemblies "in containment".
Clarifies CTS Action Statements to incorporate the Applicability changes for each individual specification were discussed previously.
LCD 3.9.2 LCD 3.8.A.1.e
-i LCO 3.9.2, LCO 3.9.2, Condition A, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, Condition A, 3.9.5, Condition A. and 3.9.6 ANaA 2LCO I---
8..2an LCO 3.8.A.2 and 3.8.A.3
________________________________________________It_______1.M n A 13-A3.9-48 Restates CTS requirements allowing for not reducing boron concentration.
LCO 3.9.5 and 3.9.6 A3.9-50 1Clarifies CTS requirements for equipment hatch and penetration closure.
3.9.6 Clarifies CTS required actions for when the one RHR pump is not operating and the water level is below 20 ft above the reactor vessel flange.
LCO 3.9.2 LCU 3.B.A.2 2
Prairie Island ITS i, oi, '.Anng A3.9-1 4 A3.9-28 VA3.9-47 A3.9-52 ILCO 3.8.A.3 ILCO 3.9.2 ILCO 3.8.A.2 UUV FIQ.
Ir
-I.-
I I
I I
S...,.
TS5Section,.
I CT
',SSectiorn FE 13.8.A.1.a.2.b ILCO 3.8.A.1.d ILCO 3.9
ýLCO 3.8.A.1.e LCO 3.9.2 ILCOU 3.8.A.3
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 4.0 - Design Features (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
-S S et ion CTS Section DOC No.
Summary.-
I.ýEditorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the guidance of NURGE-1 431.
Revises CTS description of the reactor core to conform to ISTS format.
Revises CTS requirements to include a statement for the spacing of new fuel storage and change references to other sections of the CTS to agree with the ITS location of the information.
Includes a new statement specifying that the spent fuel pool design prevents draining the pool which replaces CTS statements.
1 4.2 5.3.A 4.3.1 5.6.A 4.3.2 15.16 5.3, and 5.6.A
____1
4.3.3 5.6.D A4.0-09 IRevises CTS description of fuel storage capacity.
I 4.3.1 5.6.A.3 Includes reference to TN-40 earlier in the paragraph.
1 Prairie Island ITS A4.0-00 A4.0-02 A4.0-06 A4.0-07 A4.0-1 1 15.6,-
ý5.3.A 14.2 4.3.1 14.3.2 I5.6.D 14.3.3 5.6.A.3 14.3.1
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 5.0 - Administrative Controls (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No.
A5.0-00 15.0-04 rA5.0-05 4*-,
.7
ITS Section CTh Se".tlon
.5.
m" n
a Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.
Restates CTS requirements to the Steam Generator (SG) tube surveillance Program as an administrative control requirement.
Restates CTS requirements for Steam Generator (SG) tube surveillance Program in the administrative controls.
A5.0-06 Revises section, paragraph, numbering, and punctuation.
A5.0-07 Rewords CTS requirements to be consistent with 10CRF50.59.
A5.0-11 Did not include CTS requirements for shift manning since they are included in 10 CFR50.54(m)(i)(iii) and 50.54(k).
A5.0-1 2 Replaces CTS specific personnel job titles with general job titles.
A5.0-1 3 Revises CTS minor wording changes to make it consistent with ISTS as currently modified by travelers.
A5.0-14 A5.o.16 tA5.0-24 Did not include CTS containment spray system (CS), by design, as one of the example systems in the primary coolant sources outside containment.
Clarifies to assure proper understanding when complying with 10 CFR 55.4 requirements.
Revises requirements with respect to the applicability of CTS 4.0.A and 4.0.B to properly interlace With the ITS SR 3.0.3 requirements and 10 CFR 50 Appendix J.
ITS Section 5.0 4.12.A 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.5.L.2.b NA 6.2.B 5.0 6.2 and 6.5 5.22.
6.-2 -And-A NA
'1 5.3 6.3 5.3 15.5.14 tCTS Sention 4.12.A 4.12.E 6.3 1
Prairie Island ITS i;7.
Lm -I
-t_ I I-,
-F..
1^ ý "
11 71
-I 16.1 15.0 15.0 5.0 6.0 16.5.L.2.b 15.0 INA 16.2.B F5.
0 16.2 and 6.5 16.2 and 6.4
ý52.2.b INA 16.531
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 5.0 - Administrative Controls (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
OO~o, Smnayo vi~
~-
'I1T5S ection CtS Section A5.0-26 Clarifies reporting requirements stating that a single submittal may be made for the plant combining 5.6.1 6.6.A, 6.6.B sections common to a two unit plant.,and 6.6.C A5.0-27 Did not include"CTS requirements for monthly reporting of challenges to the pressurizer power operated NA 6.6.D relief valves or pressurizer safety valves.
A5.0-28 Includes COLR reference to latest Prairie Island Plant approved steam line break methodology.
5.5.5 6.5.E A5.0-31 Replaces CTS list of limits and corresponding TS with a new list of ITS specifications which reference 5.6.5 6.6.E the COLR. Each of these ITS specifications either corresponds to a CTS which references the COLR or justification was previously provided in the appropriate ITS package for relocating the limit to the COLR.
A5.0-32 Replaces CTS list of TS referencing the PTLR with a new list of ITS specifications which reference the 5.6.6 6.6.F PTLR. Each of these ITS specifications either corresponds to a CTS which references the PTLR or justification was previously provided in the appropriate ITS package for relocating the limit to the PTLR.
A5.0-33 Revises CTS requirements for high radiation area updating the acceptable alternate controls to those 5.7 6.7 given in 10 CFR 20.1601 which provide an equivalent level of radiation protection to that currently provided.
A5.0-34 Revises CTS Section titles to agree with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 8.38 which will 5.7.1 and 6.7.A and assure that adequate protection is provided without unnecessary radiation exposure.
15.7.2 6.7.B A5.0-36 Restates P! requirements for battery monitoring and maintenance.
5.5.i516.5 A5.0-38 Restates CTS reporting requirement for EM as an administrative report.
'5.0 5.6 D).-Arn lelnnrl ITRq