ML023040054
| ML023040054 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/2002 |
| From: | NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD3 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| TAC MB0695, TAC MB0696 | |
| Download: ML023040054 (43) | |
Text
Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Section 1.0- Use and Application (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
I ~ 7- ~-"~j'~'.'2-
___________ '4 I [r5ectlon F CTS Section
'tc:);>OC .. -..*S~mm~" .~
1"n changes do Ji -i Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These I1.1 I ,!1*
A1.0-00 not revise or delete any technical requirements.
-1,1.1, 1.0-1.
COLR, DOSE 11.1 1.0 A1.0-01 Rewords CTS definitions of ACTIONS, CHANNEL CHECK, CORE ALTERATION, ACTIONS, ENERGY, OPERATIONAL MODE CHANNEL EQUIVALENT 1-131, E-AVERAGE DISINTEGRATION QPTR, RTP, SDM, and STAGGERED TEST CHECK, CORE MODE, OPERABLE - OPERABILITY, PTLR, BASIS. These changes do not revise the meaning or intent of the current PI definitions. ALTERATION, COLR, DOSE EQUIVALENT I 131, E-AVERAGE DISINTEGRATION ENERGY, OPERATIONAL MODE - MODE, OPERABLE OPERABILITY, PTLR, QPTR, RTP, SDM, and STAGGERED TEST BASIS 1.1a la11.1 1.0 14 testing of CHANNEL Al.0-04 Rewords CTS definition of CHANNEL CALIBRATION to specifically reference qualitative resistance temperature detectors or thermocouple sensors, allowing in place CALIBRATION 11.0 of the remaining devices in the channel.
assessment of sensor behavior, and normal calibration of the Prairie Island methodology for calibration These changes do not substantively change plant Instrumentation.
1.1 1.0
-1.0 Al .0-05 Updates CTS reference for COLR in accordance with NRC approved LAR. CO0LR Prairie Island ITS 1)
.*hilv 9002
Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Section 1.0 - Use and Application (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) aT Scto cTS Section I.ITS Section CTS Section DOC No. , .. Summary_
1.1 1.0 L1.0 FUNCTIONAL TEST to conform to CHANNEL A1.0-06 Rewords CTS wording and re-titles definition of CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL do not substantively change the PI CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST (COT). These changes TEST methodology for testing of these instruments.
NA 1.0 SETTINGS. This is an LSSS Al .0-08 Did not include CTS definition of LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEMLIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM Administrative change since the justification for not including SETTINGS is in the discussion of CTS.
1.1 1.0 Additional clarification was provided OPERABLE A1.0-09 Rewords CTS definition of OPERABLE - OPERABILITY.
power" instead of only stating normal specifically allowing credit for both "normal or emergencydefinition of OPERABLE the power. These changes do not substantively change OPERABILITY.
1.1 1.0 level for PHYSICS TESTS is 1.1 1.0 of PHYSICS TESTS. The allowed power PHYSICS TESTS A1.0-11 Rewords CTS definition MODE the MODE changes from MODE 2 to now related to the definition of power level at which 1.
NA 1.0 Did not include CTS definition for PROTECTION INSTRUMENTATION AND LOGIC since it is NA 1.0 PROTECTION A1.0-12 INSTR & LOGIC not used in the ITS.
1.0 INA SOURCE CHECK not include CTS definition for SOURCE CHECK since it is addressed within the definition of SA1.0-18 Did OPERATIONAL TEST (COT).
CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL
____________________________________________________________ I 1.1 'I 1.0 STAGGERED the second paragraph which is consistent Al .0-19 Rewords CTS STAGGERED TEST BASIS by deleting differences in use of this term TEST BASIS BASIS. Any with rules and use of ISTS STAGGERED TEST instrument test Frequencies in Section 3.3.
between CTS and ITS are accounted for by changing 2
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Section 1.0 - Use and Application (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summary ,ITS Section CTS Section Doc1o :, Sumr .~Scto DOC No, -
I. ITS are consistent [ ISTARTUP Did not include CTS definition for STARTUP OPERATION since the CTS and igAr %
A1.0-21 ISTARTUP listed in Table 1.1 and all phases of plant operation are included within the definition of MODES 1.
i- -. - L.
of the new format, 1.2 NA A1.0-24 Clarifies use of Logical Connectors to aid in the understanding and use These changes do not presentation style, and establish positions not previously formalized.
involve any substantive changes in plant operations or testing.
1.4 NA the SRs to aid in the 11.4 INA Al .0-28 Adds a section explaining the use of the Frequencies specified within style, and establish positions not understanding and use of the ITS format, presentation previously formalized. This explanation does not involve any substantive change in plant operations or testing.
Mode of 11.4 14.1 .D A1.0-29 Rewords CTS clarifying that SRs can be suspended when the plant is not in the requirements are Applicability associated with the SR. The intent of the CTS and NUREG/ITS changes have been introduced.
the same and no plant operating or testing requirement 3
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 2.0 - Safety Limits (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
'-Jj. ITS Section IT eto CTSSeto F6- cNo., Sumddtnary .. ,
ILCO 2.0 I.ILCO 2.0 L G*
A2.0-00
- BJ
- U. - - .. '-';-, .-. _______________________________________________________________
Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording.
These changes do not revise ?LCO 2.0 ILCO 2.0 or delete any technical requirements.
LCO 2.1.1, -- r LIO2.1 2.1, 2.2.A, and 2.2.B. Whichdo not 2.2.1, LCO 2.1.1,and "2.1.B, 2.2, A2.0-01 Minor format and wording changes have been made to CTS Sectiontesting. 2.2.2 SLCO 2.1, 2.2.A, and or change the meaning, limits or otherwise change plant operation 2.2.B 1
Prairie Island ITS July 2002
Table A - Administrative Changes Section 3.0 - LCO ApplicabilitylSR Applicability (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
_______________________________i ITS Section cTS Section summary ITS Section SCTS Section DOC No. __ 1 W%0%01__
I I. These changes do not LCO 3.0 LCO 3.0 and A3.0-00 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. I--- -,- 14.0-change or delete any technical requirements.
LC 3..1 L-- 3.O.A
-F.
3.0.B, and 3.0.C. These changes include 1) LCO 3.0.2,3.0.1, and LCO 3.0.B,3.0.A, 3.0.C, A3.0-01 Rewords and restates CTS phraseology for LCUs 3.0.A, and etc. instead of POWER OPERATIONS, 2) 3.0.3 3.0.C.1, and using standard MODES of Operation such as MODE 1 specific LCOs providing exemptions to 3.0.C.2 dividing LCO 3.0.A into two separated LCOs; and 3) listing those in ITS 3.0 Specifications.
the same the applicable LCO. The CTS requirements are basically LCO 3.0.3 LCO 3.0.C.1 total time from when the Condition was and 3.0.C.2 1A3.0-02 Clarifies CTS requirements for Completion Times to state the Times are the same. Any first entered and use the MODE number. CTS and ITS Completion Change.
differences are addressed in a separate Discussion of LCcO 3.03 3..
Clarifies that ITS 3.0.3 only applies in MODES 1, 2,3, and 4 which is consistent with the intent of CTS.
A3.0-04 and non-Technical Specification systems LCO 3.0.8 A3.0-09 Clarifies CTS relationship between Technical Specification which support ITS.
LCO 3.0.7 NA the purpose of performing PHYSICS A3.0-12 Clarifies CTS intent for the application of test exception LCOs for requirements.
TESTING. This change does alter any plant operations or technical LCO 3.0.9 NA A3.0-1 3 Clarifies and formalizes the use of the P1 ITS for two units.
I A3.0-17 Clarifies CTS requirements and limitations that the SRs shall be meet during the MODES or Other Specified Conditions in the Applicability for which the requirements not impose any new requirements and is consistent with current of the LCO apply. This change does practice at the PI plant. ýLC 3.01 ILC 4.0.
1 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summ'ary DOC No.
These es are handelaying off-A3.0-1 8 Rewords CTS requirements deferring . ......
.--..... entry ....
into .ARequired .I ,, Ar-TIrOtNS
.. .- ... Actions. ITS wording allows declaration that the LCO is not met rather man oelaying u ny ue ,-i-,, . . . . .. .....
setting considerations and the intent remains the same.
2 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DCoSurnmfry .'-': ITS Section CTS Section
- . -. .I DO Noj * .:
I ,
I
' . I 1 1 1 changes do not change ILC .1 .B1RILCO 3. 1 .F.
Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These V
- V@ I IV A3.1 -00 3.10, SR 4.9, Table 4.1-2A or delete any technical requirements. and Table 4.1 1C i-rLCO 3.1.3,
-- i-
-- F.
LCO 3.1.F.1, of APPLICABILITY. The plant LCO 3.1.3, Conditions 3.1 .F.3.a, A3.1 -01 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS Ml DES A and B, 3.10.A.1, and MODES to which this specification apply have not changed.
IDid LCO 3.1.1, 3.10.D.1 and 3.1.5 not include meaningless CTS statement resulting from the new ITS format. No new limits are added to 3.1.F.1
-I.. -- T., LCO LCO 3.1 .F.1 INA A3.1-02 and 3.1 .F.3.a the ITS and the CTS limits are stated in the ITS.
I 11NA LCO 3.1 .F.3.a in the ITS. This change does not INA A3.1-06 Did not include meaningless CTS statements which are not contained affect any operating limits or conditions.
r.NA -i LC0 3. 1.Fý.3. c also outlined and submitted in NA A3.1 -05 Did not include duplicative CTS NRC reporting requirements which are accordance with 10CFR50.72 and 10CFR50.73.
NA
-T.-..- hLCO 3.10 and administratively incorporates INA LCO 3.10 and A3.1-12 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements. ITS to which it applies.
SR 4.9 1 design features, or systems these statements within each specification, the plant plant design features incorporated, into the ITS, describing These statements have been administratively requirements.
or systems since they do not establish any regulatory or operational both require verifying NA LCO 3.1 0.E.2 A3.1-34 Restates CTS requirements for declaring a misaligned rod inoperable, however, This paragraph does not have SDM, taking remedial action, and allowing the plant to continue to operate.
any net change on plant operations under ITS requirements.
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Sv:ction 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (I , )C No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
-YCTS Section DOCNo.-. SUmary 5-. 5--.-.- ITS section I I ILCO 3.1.7 tLCO 3.10.F i Entry for each inoperable rod position A3.1-36 Clarifies CTS operating practices allowing for Separate Condition indicator and demand position indicator.
LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.1O.G.5 inoperable'with the ITS requirement of CLCO 3.1.4,A ILCO 3.1 O.G.5 iA3.1-48 Replaces the CTS requirement which declare a misaligned rod Condition plant would continue to operate, thus the declaring the rod as being misaligned. For either case, the change does not impact plant operations.
--r LCO 3.1.4,A -,t- LCO 3.1O.G.6 ILECO 3.0fl-.-G-. 6-not movable, verifying that the rod position is Condition A3.1-52 Rewords CTS requirements for when a rod is trippable but the rod alignment is within limits. This wording within insertion limits to the ITS wording of verification that change does not change the impact on plant operations.
r v, rods to one or more misaligned rods. This i."CLCO ndtin, --t LO3.10.G.5 A3.1-54 Rewords CTS Action Statement from one or more inoperable Condit~io~nD requirements.
change does not affect plant operations or any technical
-¶ SR 3.1.4.3 LCO 3.1O.H A3.1-57 IRewords CTS terminology "loss of stationary gripper coil voltage" with gripper coil voltage. This terminology does not change the "beginning of decay of stationary SR performance and clarifies CTS intent.
ISR 3.1.4.3 ILCO 3.10.H 2
Prnirm Ilcdnd ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
- a- r I ITS Section CTS Section sUdmeary DOC No.
These changes do not LCO 3.2 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. ýLCO 3.2 LCO 3.10 and A3.2-00 Table 3.5.2.AI change or delete any technical requirements.
at the beginning of each CTS -7 LCO 3.2.13.2 and LCO 3.10 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements ILCO 3.2 ILCO 3.10 not impose any operational or
.A3.2-01 section. These statements only provided general information and do technical requirements.
LCO 1. 3.10.B.1, LCO 3.10.B.1 consistent With ISTS. 3.2.2 3.2.1 and LCO 3.10.B.2, A3.2-03 IReplaces CTS symbols for hot channel factors with symbols 3.10.B.3(a),
3.1 0.B.3(b),
3.10.B.3(d)1, and 3.10.B.3(d)2 NA LCO 3.10.B.1, which are no longer applicable. 3.10.B.3(d),
A3.2-05 Did not include CTS Unit 1, Cycle 19 specific requirements and 3.11 SR 3.2.1.2,
-F, r
rr% n 4ew n n IsýLC,;
all SRs are required to be performed S§R -3.2.1.2, 3.2.1.1, 3.1U..2I*.
.3.2-06 Did not include CTS SR phrase "whichever occurs first* since 3.2.2.1, and regardless of which condition occurs first. 3.2.2.2 SR 3.2.1.2 ILCO limits which is consistent with the intent of ISR 3.2.1.2 A3.2-22 Clarifies CTS by adding a Note to reverify that Fwq is within C1O 3.1 I- Ithe CTS. II A3.2-23 I when Restates CTS descriptions of when the specification is
__ ___withaoreprecise applicable with a more precise lity !h LCO 3.2.3 L00o 3.10-defined as MODE 1 with power > 15% RTP which consistent with the intent of CTS.
I Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
I -- I CTS Section -I DOC No. Summary ITS Section I LCO 3.2.3 ILCO 3.10.B.4.
I. band when two or more operable excore LCO 3.2.3 1LCO 3.10.B.A, A3.2-26 Restates CTS requirement that the AFD is outside the target 3.10.B.5, and channels indicate it is outside the target band for all power levels. 3.10. B.6 4 - ---- - --- .
- --I -. O-3.10.8.
1.
define the ranges of applicability when there is a ILCO 3.2.3 LCO 3.1 0.B.5 A3.2-27 Rewords CTS Action Statement to more accurately any substantive changes in and 3.10.B.6I This change does not make deviation between the AFD and Target Band.
plant operation.
Clarifies CTS Note allowing for extending the time the indicated AFD may deviate from the Target LCO 3.2.3 LCO IL-CO 3.2.3 LCO A3.2-33 3.10.B.6(a) calibration.
Band without penalty deviation time during the incore/excore requires QPTR limits to be met in L-C-O 3.2.4---iLCO 3.10.C.1 A3.2-37 Clarifies CTS by using a more precise Applicability Statement which MODE 1 with the power > 50%.
NA LCO POWER TILT RATIO (OPTR) if not INA 3.10.C.la A3.2-38 Did not incorporate CTS requirements to "correct" the QUADRANT within limits because restoring a limit is always an option.
determining QPTR can be one or more SR 3.2.4.2 LCO 3.10.C.4 A3.2-58 IClarifies CTS by adding a note stating that other means of excore nuclear channel inputs inoperable.
2 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation Section)
(DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS eformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance Alicability and Objective statements. ITS administrative to wh ecification, the plant design features, or systems plant ministratively incorporated, in the ITS, describing tablish any regulatory or operational requirements.
Sto another section.
nt with ISTS.
the ISTS.
o"Required Channels" to be consistent with Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) summary ITS Section CTS Section DOC No.
... .. Table 3.3.1-1. iTables 3.5-A3.3-07 Replaces specific CTS references win iTi references. and Table 2',a Tale 2B, 3.5-1 Fu 13.3.2-1, and thýru 19, FU 1 thru 9 3.15-1 r...e.3.3.1-1 ra.
--- I::Table 3.3.1-1, -I_
35 modes. The applicable Modes are specifically 'table 3.5-2A Function 6 A3.3-08 Deletes CTS general collective titles of the applicable title.
FU 5 and defined in the Table and do not need to be described in the function Table 4.1-1A Function 6 3.3.4.3 SR 3.3.4.3 Table 3.5-1 Table 3.5-1 for the degraded voltage DG start time ISR A3.3-09 Clarifies CTS requirements for the time delay and time range Function 10 delay.
- I Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A named Reactor Trip Table FU 17,3.3.1and -1, I.Table 3.5-2A Functions 19 A3.3-1 4 Reformatted CTS ofincluding the RTBs have been included in a Table Function Note h and 20 Note 1Breakers instead their own separate Function. (d) and Table 4.1-1 A Functions 19 and 20, Notes 15 and 16 LCO 3.3.1, -4
-1Table 3.5-2A, LCO 3.3.1, Cond B, C, Table Actions3.5-2A, 1, 4, A3.3-18 IReformatted CTS Action Statements to be consistent with ISTS.
D,E, F, H, J, 5,6,7,8,11, K, L, M, N,0, and 33 and and Note 1, Table 3.5-28 LCO 3.3.2, Actions A, 20, Cond B, C, D, 21, 23, 24, 25, E, F, G, H, I, 26, 27, 28, 29,1 J, and K 30, 31, 32, 2-------
Prairie Island ITS
. . - f
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOc No.
Summary ITS Section Cond A, B, and C I.34 CTS Section lnd3 Icillu 00 ITabte 3.3.1-1. Table 3.5-2A3.5-2A Table 3.3.1-1, I-Table Function 18 A3.3-19 IRevises CTS title for reactor trip system consistent with ISTS by deleting "and Interkck". FU 19 and Table 4.1 1A Function 18 1
11 3.3.1, LCO 3.3.1,
___________________________________________________________________ 1 Table addition, the Cond B, M, 0, 1-1 LCO Action 3.5-2A, 1,7, 9, A3.3-21 Replaces CTS Action Statements Mode Titles with equivalent Mode numbers. In and 10, and in total hours instead of specific and P and Completion Times have been reformatted to require actions increments. The overall times have not changed. LCO 3.3.2, Table 3.5-2B, Cond B, C, F, Action 20, 23, and G 25, 27, and 28
-,r LCO 3.0.4 and Table 3.5-2A prior to increasing IAction 3 A3.3-23 Did not include CTS statement that the IRNIs channel be restored to OPERABLE LCO 3.3.1 LCO 3F .0.4 an provides the same restriction.
power above P-6. This requirement is included in ITS LCO 3.0. 4, which Cond
- -I.
--l: Table 3.3.1-1, LCQ 2.3.8.1, the reactor trip Table FU 16,3.3.1 -1, IN 16.b.2, LCO 2.3.B.1, Replaces specific CTS terminology "unblocked" with "blocked" when describing 2.3.B.2, FA3.3-28 2.3.B.4, and interlocks. 16.d, and 16.e. 2.3.B.5
.-- --- 1.LCO 3.3.1 Table ---3.5-2A
-Iý. - .--
A3.3-29 Reformats CTS presentation of shutdown tracks consistent with ISTS format.
LCO B, M, N, 11 Cond3.3.11 Table Actions3.5-2A 1, 7, 0, and P, 8, 9, and 10 LCO 3.3.2, and Table 3.5 Cond B, C, F, 2B Actions 20, and G 23, 25, and 28 3
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (1) )C No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summary ITS Section CTS Section DOC No. Table 3.5-2A PF*A3l: l nrinrtn nlacinn in service SR 3.3.1.4
... . h
. . ifn' 1,..
1A3.3-34 rt: , , -- . .,,.. . .,.. ...U .. . .. Nýo~t eT '1 Action 10 ue, ,.,,
ceform atted CTS requirem entsTforSinoperableH It,.D
___________________________________ t---------
Table 3.3.2-1, 1Table 3.5-2B reflect PI design. Table FU 2, 2b, 3b, Table 3.3.2-1, Functions 3.5-213le, A3.3'-35 Revises CTS title, "Automatic Actuation Relay Logic" to more accurately 4b, and 5b 2c, 3.e, 4.f, Table 3.3.5-1 5e, 6d, and 7f Table 4.1-1B FU le, 2c, 3c, 4f, 5e, 6d, and 7f.
Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B function is not required below 2000 Note a note a and A3.3-38 Reformats OTS Note to be consistent with ISTS meaning that the Table 4.1-1B psig in the RCS.
Note 21
-t;Table 3.3.5-1, I-Table 3.3.5-1, Table .5-2B - I of CVI OPERABLE during Notes a, b, Table Note b3.5-213 and A3.3-39 Reformats CTS Note consistent with ISTS requiring the function and Table 4.1-1B containment integrity and movement of irradiated fuel.
Applicability Note 26 Table - -
3.3.2-1
- - I rable Table 3.5-2B MSIVs are closed. Table 3.3.2-1 note c 3.5-213 and A3.3-43 Reformats CTS Note restating the Applicability for when both Note c Table 4.1-1B Note 23.
n n n 4 I-r-La- n r on U
I-r-t-i-able6.3.2-1, FTableu.t-2 Revises CTS Function Title deleting "4.16 kV" since it is redundant information. FU 6 Function 7 A3.3-7 4
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
_____________________________I ITS Section CTS Section -I CTS SectionI Summary IITS Section nOC No.
I I- - --............ . ,
IC. I Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B A3.3-48 Clarifies CTS with wording consistent wire1,, J. iNote G,- Footnote and Table 4.1 -1BI NAlTable 3.5-28 Acid Storage Tanks from the Safety A3.3-50 Revised CTS consistent with LAR entitled, "Removal of Boric Function Action 34,9 35, Injection System."
and 36 Table 3.5-26 rable FU 6e 3.3.2-1, into the turbine driven AFW and the motor driven and A3.3-51 Reformats CTS requirements from being subdivided Table 4.1-1B AFW. Function 7d Restates CTS required actions for systems normally blind flanged and not operating. LCO 3.3.5, 'Table 3 5-2B, A3.3-54 Rds Cond B and C jAction 22 LCO 17-i---- 3.3.1,
- ,-.- Table 3.5-213, LCO 3.3.1n Action 30 A3.3-55 Did not include CTS statement allowing one channel to be bypassed for up to 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> for surveillance Condition I testing since this is included with the AFW logic testing.
3.3.3 LCO 3.15 LCO ---
ILCO 3.3.3 any technical requirements.
A3.3-62 IDid not include CTS specific Objective statements which did not provide LCO 3.3.3, LCO 3.15.C inoperable EM equipment. LCO 3.3.3, ILCO 3.15.C A3.3-63 IRestates CTS requirements allowing the plant to start up with Actions 3.3.3-1, ITable 3.15-1 Table 3.15-1 Flow Path." Table FU 9 3.3.3-1, IA3.3-65 IRestates CTS using ISTS descriptive terminology "Penetration Function 9 5
n .. ,,lclnnrl IT.R
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summary, ITS Section CTS Section DOC No.
S...
.. . ... T ab! 3.q."41-1. T ahle3.R 1 R 1 A3.3-66 Did not include unnecessary CTS descriptive verbiage. FU 15 and Actionnd 16t Table 3.3.3, and 16 Note c Note c 3.3.1-1..A Table Table Note c3.3.1 -1 NA A3.3-68 tClarifies CTS adding a Note in the EM Table that each core exit thermocouple is a channel.
LCO 3.3.3, NA--
A3.3-69 Clarifies CTS by providing a direction for operators to follow if they do not comply with specific Cond H Completion Times.
3.3.1-1, I-rable 4.1-lA, not include CTS column title of Functional Test since this test has been replaced by other tests i.e., 1;rable FU 1 thru 19 Table FU 4.1 -120A, 1 thrt A3.3-72 Did TADOT, COT, or ALT. and 4.1-1B, and 4.1-1C I-.. . . - Table 4.1-iA Power Range Neutron Flux High Setpoint. FU T 6, 3.3:.1-1, able 7, and Functions 2a, A3.3-75 =Restate UTS requirements for SRs for the calibration of the 20 7, and 8.
r Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-lA SR of the 4 kV .---
Table 3.3.1-1, -TTable 4.1 -1 A A3.3-81 Clarifies CTS requirements that setpoint verification is not required for the quarterly IFU 11 and 12 Functions 15 RCP Bus undervoltage and underfrequency. and 16b Table 4.1-lA logic and reactor trip Table FU 17 3.3.1 19 Table and -1, 4.1 -118 Functions A A3.3-84 Clarifies CTS requirements for response time testing of the automatic trip breakers. and 19
-- iSLCO 3.3 the ISTS. Table 4.1-1A, A3.3-85 IDid not include CTS format for Frequency notations not included in Table 4.1-lB and Table 4.1 1C 6
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
SummarTSSection CTS Section SNo DOC No.I: ., u mary -
Non e.1.1
.. 1,
- 4. ---
A3.3-94 Did not include unnecessary CTS descriptive wording. Note Note 7li.1 r bli I3.3.1.5, t, ri iJ.1.4,
%n 4 A I aaie '4.1-lA I-r-9.1- A 4 4 A IRestates CTS requirements for STAGGERED TEST BASIS consistent with ISTS. and Note ITable 94.1l-1A and A3.3-95 3.3.2.2 I SR3.3.1.4, Table 4.1-1B Note 22
_____________________________ T NA rable 4.1-lB A3.3-107 Did not include OTS Note referencing a specific Specification since it is no longer applicable. ýIA Table 4.1-1B Note 25
+
SF1 3.3.2.4,
^ - .
NA IKIA A3.3-109 Clarifies CTS by adding a Note requiring verification of the setpoint is not required by this SR. ------------
SR 3.3.2.4, INA Note NA -I F Table 4.1-10 Table 4.1 -1 C IkIA INA Functions 5, A3.3-114 Incorporated LAR, "Removal of Boric Acid" into the CTS.
7, 9 and 12 and Note 33 Table 4.1-1C NA I--
INA Notes 35, 36, A3.3-123 Did not include CTS Notes due to ISTS format.
and 37 r-T. ;;:
LCO 3.3.1, ýLCO 3.10O.C.4I A3.3-126 IRestates CTS references for TS 3.11 to ITS 3.2.4.2. Cond D
____________________1 laDle J1-1,
^* ^A A I-T anie L
m 1-J.b-A
^ A Table FU 3.3.1-1, 15,17, Table 3.5-2A Function 17, A3.3-128 IReplaces CTS designation of channel for SI input, trip, and RTBs with train designation. and 19 18 and 19 7
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
CTS Section DOC No. DOC No.Ah ~al summary"ITSSection Q~ .31-.ILO23...
A3.3-130 Revises the CTS definition of the nomenclature and the values Tor f(AI) consistenit wni.i moo. IFUu6,u No.t. 1- 1, 6, Note 1 and 2.3.A.2.e is a Table 3.3.1-1, --LCO 2.3.A.2.g -1
- 1. -"ý ^ ^ A ^ -
Tfable 3i.3.A-1 -1 Restates CTS requirements that undervoltage is a percentage of normal voltage to undervoltage FU 1la and LCO 2.3.A.2.gI A3.3-133 percentage of rated bus voltage. l1b Table. .3.-1 LC ...
Clarifies CTS instrumentation ranges for measuring high pressurizer water level and low low steam -14 FTable 3.3.1-1, 11 LCO 2.3.A.3.a A3.3-134 -FU 9 and 13 and 2.3.A.3.b generator water level which are specified as a percentage of narrow range.
H 3.3.1.B rale .1-lA neutron Table 4.1-1A Restates CTS SR that a COT be performed on intermediate range and source range
ýSH 3.3.1.8 A3.3-141 Notation 4 of 2 days. The ITS requires instrumentation prior to reactor startup following each shutdown in excess the same SR Frequency only specified as 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> instead of a 2 days.
11LCO 3.3.2, 3.5-2B Table 3.5-2B the MSIVs can be LCO 3.3.2, Tacte 1-1 iA3.3-142 Clarifies CTS applicability by specifically stating that once the plant is in Mode 3, Condition G Action 25 shut thus exiting the Mode of Applicability which is consistent with ISTS.
CALIBRATION.
SR---
--TSR
-l 3..31 3.3.3.1, I-Table4..1-10 Table 4.1 -1 41C I
A3.3-1 43 Clarifies CTS requirements that the neutron detectors are excluded from CHANNEL 3.3.3.2, and Footnote This is consistent with current PI practices and ISTS requirements. LCO 3.3.5 and FU 23 5.b.ti, LUO -- I n -@ff 1ý - - I Or% I-r-L 3.3.3, Cond C Action Tab:le 3.15 (a)l A3.3-144 Restates CTS requirements for submitting a report to the NRC.
and J and 3
- -.-.-.----- -I LUU ii.b, I.
I aDle 1.b-b, n re nn Clarifies CTS requirements ensuring that with one or more trains of radiation monitoring inoperable, 11AA~% n LGon 3.3.5, n
able 3.t-n2B, A3.3-146 exhaust valves are ýCond A and B Action 22 operation may continue provided that the containment inservice purge supply and closed.
T.WO 3.3.5
- - - T.LUU 3AiU.Z.C -i ILCO 3.3.5 ILCO 3.6.D.2.cI A3.3-147 IReformats CTS requirements for CVI instrumentation.
8 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) a --- FCTS Section ITS Section
.Summary" DOCt4o. I. - , ,, --, k. .
I I t - -te Functions inoperable, enter ILCO 3.3.5. iLCO 3.6.D.2.c dl A3.3-148 Restates CTS actions requiring that with one or more inservice purge inservice purge valves made Condition B applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.6.3 for containment inoperable by isolation instrumentation.
LCO 3.3.5 and ILCO 3.8.A.1 .1 pLCO 3.3.5andbLt O 3.8.A.1 A3.3-'149 IReformatted CTS consistent with ISTS wording.
jApplicability
___________________1 LCO 3.3.4, Table 3.5-2B, entry is allowed for each LCO 3.3.4n Table 3.5-2B, A3.3-150 Clarifies CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that separate condition Condition A Function 8.
Function. This is consistent with PI current intent.
3.3.4 LCO 3.3.4 Table 3.5-2B, specific actions are required ILCO Table 3.5-2B,
[A3.3-151 Clarifies CTS intent that if the automatic load sequencers are inoperable, Function 8 to be taken.
Table 3.3.1-1, FrTable 4.1-1A response time testing. Table FU 2a,3.3.1 2b, -1, 3a, Functions 2a, A3.3-155 IClarifies CTS requirements that the neutron detectors are excluded from 3b, 5, 6, and 7 2b, 3a, 5, 6, SR 3.3.1.16, and 7 Note
_____________________________________ r
- I ^ I-r-L.1- ^ ý n to be taken out of ILCO:I3.1.8 able 3.5-o2A, A3.4-1-58 Eliminates CTS requirements allowing two channels of power range instrumentation Action 2d service since the ISTS incorporates this allowance generically.
9 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) eto SUmmrny - . . ITS Section I T IF ICTS Section F I I LCO 3.1,3.3.
These changes do not ILCO 3.4 It LCO 3.10, 3.1, 3.3,4.1 Table A3.4-00 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. LCO 3.4 2A, Table 4.1-2B, change or delete any technical requirements. Table 4.1-1C, 4.3 and 4.6 LCO 3.4 T. -- - - -r LCO 3.1 and 4.3 beginning of each CTS section. LCO 3.4 LCO 3.1 and 4.3 A3.4-03 Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the do not impose any operational or technical These statements only provide general information and requirements. ILCO 3.4 MODES of APPLICABILITY. The 3.1.A.l.b(1),
A3.4-08 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS 3.1.A.1.b (2),
plant Modes to which this specification apply have not changed.
3.1.A.l.c(1),
3.1 .A.1 .c(3),
3.1.A.1.d, 3.1.A.2.a(1),
3.1 .A.2.a(2),
3.1 .A.2.a(3),
3.1.A.2.b(1),
3.1.A.2.c(1),
3.1.A.2.c(1)(a),
3.1 .A.2.c(1)(b),
3.1 .A.2.c(1)(b)3, 3.1 .B.1 .b, 3.1.C.1, 3.1.C.2, 3.1 .C.2.d, 3.1.C.3, 3.1.D.2, 3.1 .D.2.a, 3.1 .D.2.b, 3.10.J and 4.3.
I - -------
1 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
=. . . .. .
summary ITS Section CTS Section FDO-C No.]
I . INA I. ILCO 3.1 .A.1.b(2),
V to ITS general rules ;INA I.- ILCO3.1 .A.1.b(2),.
A3.4-14 Did not include CTS statement that "STARTUP OPERATION which is duplicative is Specification 3.1 .A.2.a(2), and 3.1.A.2.b(1) governing how the plant may operate. Among these rules for use and applicability with inoperable TS 3.1 .A.2.c(1)(b) to startup 3.0.4 which, unless specifically excepted, does rnat allow the plant required equipment.
NA INA ýLCO 3.1 .A.1 .b(3)
A3.4-18 Did not include CTS actions which are defined by the format of ITS.
NA LCO 3.1 .A.l .b(3) by ITS format. INA ýLCO 3.1 .A.1 .b(3)
A3.4-22 IDid not include CTS requirements for the plant to shut down which are provided LC 0 -3.-4-.-7 LC O 3.1.A .l. -c to be operable with one in A3.4-28 Divides CTS Specification requiring two methods of cooling the RCS Specifications.
operation when in MODE 4 and MODE 5, loops filled into two separate L003.4.3,
-1. - - - - - LCO 3.1 .A.2.a(2).
I -.
format for CTS and ITS fundamentally differ in LCO 3.4.3,L 3.4.9, LCO 3.1 3.1 .A.2.a(2).
.A.2.a(3),
A3.4-39 Revises CTS format to be consistent with the ITS. The requirements are the same. Conditions 3.1.A.2.c.(1,(b)(1),
the presentation of shutdown tracks but the Completion Time A, B, and C, 3.1.A.2.c.(1)(b)(3),
LCO 3.4.11, 3.1.B.1.b and Conditions 3.1.C.2 D, E, and G, LCO 3.4.14, Conditions B, C, and D, and LCO 3.4.15
-T;LCO 3.4.10 ILCO 3.1 .A.2.b (1) 2485 psig +/-:3% when tested for LCO 3.4.10 ILCO 3.1.A.2.b (1)
FA3.4-46 Incorporates CTS allowance for pressurizer safety valves to be operability.
I ...........-
2 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) eto ITS Section I T CTS Section Sufnrfiry I DOC No. 3.1 .A.2.c LCO LCO 3.1.A.2.c C format. INA (1)(b)(1),
A3.4-49 DDid not include CTS required action since it is included based on ITS 3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)(3),
3.1 .A.2.c(1)(b)(4),
and 3.1 .A.2.c(1)(b)(5)
I-_CO 3.4.3 ILCO 3.1.B.1.b and temperature limits by dividing them into L A3.4-61 FRevises CTS requirements for maintaining RCS pressure changing to the NUREG-1431 use of two sets of action statements. This change also includes descriptions. These are editorial and format prose MODES to define plant conditions rather than use of intent.
changes and do not change PI operating practices or LCO
, 3.4.16 Lco 3.1 .C.1 and 3.0.3, which is the appropriate action if no 3.1 .C.2.d Clarifies CTS requirements to immediately enter into LCO is consistent with current PI practices.
leakage detection instrumentation is OPERABLE. This
[A3.4-71 C03.-1,iLO31C2a with the ITS definition of LEAKAGE. This I1LCO 3.4.14, ILCO 3.1.C.2.a A3.4-73 Clarifies CTS LEAKAGE requirements making it consistent Conditions change is consistent with PI current operating practices. Aand C Did not include CTS requirements since it is included in the ITS format. ýNA ------ iLCO 3.1.C.2.d A3.4-77 3.414 4.12 e LCD-3.1--.-
tube inspection Condition D land r-to include iHITS Section 5.5. 33.4.14 ILCO SR 3.1 .C.2.e A3.4-78 Revises CTS requirements for inservice steam generator iD land SR 4.12 with this change. and SR No technical changes are associated 3.4.14.2 LC.3..1 t.
ILC33A3ad consistent with the ITS format. LCO 3.4.12 LCO 3.3.A.3 and 3.3.A.4 A3.4-83 Clarifies CTS Applicability to be and 3.4.13 3
Prairie Island ITS I.A.I. nrltt nn
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summary ITSh ectionI CTS Section DOC No.
after each refueling to ISR 3.4.15.1 ISR 4.3 Revises CTS SR Frequency general statement from prior to resuming power 1% . .lI%."....... 1 ... ...
A3.4-99 every 24 months.
i SR 3.4.1.4 T LCO 3.10.J -
made and no ISR 3.4.1.4 LCO 3.10O.J A3.4-100 Clarifies CTS requirements for RCS total flow rate. Only editorial changes were parameter, technical or operational changes made.
I 3.4.6 LCO 3.4.6 LCO 3.1.A.l.c (1)
"whenever the reactor coolant system average temperature is below 350 F" ILCO A3.4-102 Replaces CTS statement, CTS is the same as ITS with the ITS equivalency of MODE 4. The temperature limit of 350 F in the Mode 4.
3.4.11 LCO3.1.A.1.c (1)
LCO 3.4.11 system average temperature is below 350 F" ýLCO A3.4-103 Replaces CTS statement, "whenever the reactor coolant of below 350 F in the with the ITS equivalency of MODE 5 with RCS loops filled. The temperature limit CTS is enveloped in the ITS Mode 5 with RCS loops filled.
-t- 3.4.12 1.LCO 3.1 .A.i .c (2)
LCO 3.4.12 of removing decay heat. The LCO ILCO 3.1.A. i.c (2)
A3.4-104 Editorially revises CTS action statement for only one OPERABLE method and 3.4.13 actions are the same in both CTS and ITS.
I 11LCO 3.4.12 -*--:--
, 11 f-t-N -3 4 A 4 - 101%
heat removal inoperable. LCO 3.4.12 Editorially revises CTS shutdown requirements with one method of decay no technical or operational and 3.4.1'3" LCU 3:. 1 .,A.1.C (2)1 A3.4-105 The Actions and Completion Times In both the CTS and ITS are the same, changes have been made to this requirement.
3.4.13 r LCO 3.1.A.1.c (3)
Editorially revises CTS requirement with no methods of removing decay heat. CTS and ITS actions -T.11LCO
-__ --. ý -- 111
ýLCO 3.4.13 rLCO -3.1 .A.1 .c -(3)-
A3.4-106 and Completion Times remain the same.
LCO 3.4.11 LCO 3.1.A.1.c (1) for removing decay heat. ILCO 3.4.11 ILCO 3.1.A.l.c (1)
FA3.4-107 Editorially revises CTS requirements for defining the acceptable methods of the two to or a combination CTS and ITS allow the use of the same decay heat removal system meet the LCO requirements.
4 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant Section) System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS P 1 ITS Section CTS Section Summary
) No. ........
i do not have to L1fýr%
03 A I 1 1 Actions LCO and 3.1.A.2.c (1) by adding a note stating that the Required Ap
ý3.4-110 Clarifies intent of CTS requirements 3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)(4) inoperable is a result of power being be entered ifsole reason for the block valves being declared or technical changes are associated removed to comply with other Required Actions. No operational with this change. .CO 3.4.11 (C1 31(.bA.2.c with both block valves inoperable, restore L 6.4-111 Clarifies intent of CTS requirements by adding a Note that reason for the block valves being declared (1)(b)(5) one block valve to OPERABLE status within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, if sole other Required Actions. No operational inoperable is a result of power being removed to comply with or technical changes are associated with this change.
but not required to SR3.4.14.1]Table 4.1-2A Item Clarifies CTS requirements that the Primary System Leakage be evaluated daily, 43.4-112 operation. Performance of this SR at 19 be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after establishment of steady state and consistent with the intent of the CTS.
steady state conditions is standard PI operating practice SR 3.4.11.1 Table 4.1-2A Item adding a Note stating that the SR is to be performed in MODES 1 and 2 6 A3.4-113 Clarifies CTS requirements by in MODE 3 is standard PI operating practice for the Pressurizer PORV Block. Performance of this SR and consistent with the intent of the CTS.
SR 3.4.11.2 Table 4.1-2A Item CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that the SR is to be performed in MODES 1 and 2 A3.4-114 Clarifies MODE 3 is standard PI operating practice 17 to functionally test the PORVs. Performance of this SR in and consistent with the intent of the CTS. LCO 3.1.A.1.c (2)
LCO3.4.11 LCO 3.4.11 ILCO 3.1 .A.l.c (2)1 revises CTS requirements that two methods of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when lad 3.4.12 A3.4-120 Editorially method of removing decay heat, initiate prompt the reactor is in MODE 5. With only one OPERABLE decay heat. The ITS requires two loops of action to restore two OPERABLE methods of removing MODE 5. With one required loop inoperable decay heat removal be OPERABLE when the reactor is in to restore a second loop to OPERABLE and one RHR loop OPERABLE, immediately initiate action Actions and associated Completion Times status. Since the only changes were editorial, the Required practices were changed.
are the same and no technical changes or operating 5
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
'ill~ I .- ~ ~ ummary I -L 11.
of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when the ILCO 3.4.11 ILCO 3.1 .A.1 .c (2)1 A3.4-121 Editorially revises CTS requirements for two methods and 3.4.12 the Required Actions and associated Completion reactor is in MODE 5. These changes were editorial; operating practices were changed.
Times are the same and no technical changes or A3.4-122 Editoriall revises CTS Required Actions with no methods of removing decay heat. These changes 1 LCO 3.4.13 ILCO 3.1 .A.l.c (3)
Times are the same and no technical the Required Actions and associated Completion editorial .were changes or operating practices were changed.
Footnote and replacing power operation SR 3.4.17.3 Table 4.1-2B Item A3.4-124 rEditorially revises CTS requirement by combining-the SR and with MODE 1.
13 SR 3.4.17.2 Table 4.1-2B Item this SR at reactor power with MODE 1. 2 r.3.4-125 Editorially revises CTS requirement for performing NA iLCO 3.3.A.3(b) vessel head be removed. This flexibility exits the A3.4-1 27 Did not include CTS requirements that reactor specification Applicability as defined in ITS.
to perform testing. This is included in ITS ILCO 3.0.5 ISR 4.3 A3.4-132 Eliminated CTS wording allowing returning PIV to service LCO 3.0.5 6
Dir~ir lqlqnrd ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
J- ' "Summary . . i cto SScctio CTS Section DOCNo._______"________SectionICTS do not ILCO 3.5.2 ILCO 3.3. 1 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes L.%a%_1O.U.C-A3.5-00 Table 4.1-2B, change or delete any technical requirements. and 4.5
- -- . . . . . .4' n boron concentration Revises specific CTS details of RWST OPERABILITY requirements for volume and
ýLCO 3.5.4 LCO 3.3,A.1.aI A3.5-01 to an SR.
i.1 1 .1 . TI r-% n a3A -4t, II boron Revises CTS details for the ECCS Accumulators OPERABILITY requirements for volume, the SRs.
ILCU 3.5.1 ýLG;U3.3.A.1 .b A3.5-04 are open to concentration, nitrogen cover pressure, and verification that the isolation valves LCO 3.5.2 LCU 3.3.A.1.c --I ILCO 3.5.2 ILCO 3.3.A.1 .cI A3.5-07 lReplaces CTS Applicability Statement to exclude MODE 4.
_______________________________________________ ItLU ;i.i
- LLAJ 3.JM..e 3 13 A 13 - II I-r% 03 0 4 li t-r%
boron concentration events. ILCU 3.5.'1. ILC. U.3.A.2Y.eI A3.5-15 IReplaces CTS Action Statement for Accumulator inoperability to exclude I I and the other A3.5-1j7 Clarifies CTS requirements for entering a shutdown track is one ECCS train is inoperable train cannot supply 100% flow.
-t-SR 3.5.4.2 LGO from the Safety S§R 3.5.4.2 LCO A3.5-20 Incorporates NRC approved LAR entitled, "Removal of Boric Acid Storage Tanks 3.3.A.1 .a, Injection System," submitted April 17, 2000. Table 4.1-2B, 4.5.B.3.a, and 4.5.B.3.c of NA SR 4.5.B.1.a A3.5-22 IDid not include CTS reference to the IST Program using a Specification number with the actual title IST.
1 Prairie Island ITS h oltt qn1"1
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOCNo.I I .___ Slibihnay '
__ ___r_ ' __
1 iTS Section
____"__.. CTS Section section. O.U ,
ILCO .3 ': cila nd Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS i co .rs IIL%.,%J S.,wR 4.5 l A3.5-301 SR 4.5 technical These statements only provided general information and do not impose any operational or requirements.
ILCOLCO 3.52and 3.5 and -Fv LCO 3.3.A, System, and ECCS SR 4.5.B.1.a, A3.5-302 Revises CTS Specification titles for Safety Injection and Residual Heat Removal SR 3.5.2.51 Safety Injection System to ECCS. and 4.5.B.3.f
- LCU 3.5.2
- 1. -- - - - LUU 3.3.A.1 11 ýý - - A ILCO 3.5.2 LnO 3.3.A.1 A3.5- 303 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. and 3.3.A.2 I t1ann-an I,LUU n,.
r3 11 t-n expressed in Replaces CTS OPERABILITY range for accumulator volume and nitrogen cover pressure
-TC-10-03--Cl A3.5-304 IS 3.5* .,1 .2 3.3.A.1 .b(3) allowable variation by the equivalent simple range over which terms of a median value plus or minus the the parameters are acceptable.
- it-i i I.LUU ;s.;jjTe may exist..." This ILGOU 3.3.A.2 Clarifies CTS requirements, "any one of the following conditions of inoperabilitysame time. In the ITS, ISH 3:.5.2 A3.5-306 requirement prevents two or more of the listed conditions from existing at the to assure that these conditions may be in more than one specification. The SFDP provides a mechanism entry into multiple TS Conditions will not result in loss of safety function.
______________________ - I -.
~A3.5-307 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />"~C .. C ....
incorporates NRC approved LAR titled, "Increase ECOS Accumulator Allowed Outage Time to ff-i --- L-J I- I*l-I --3 rf 4 -4
- m 3.5.1.1 11 rf-t LCOU T3.5-309 Clarifies CTS Actions to be taken ifboth accumulators were inoperable.3.0.C ITS specifically has a Condition 3.3.A.1.b.(1) requiring entry into LCO 3.0.3. The CTS would require entry into LCO since there would not be a specific Action Statement for both accumulators being inoperable.
~ItIM I'
% 4 - TILCO 3.3.A.1.g numbers. Both LCO 3.3.A.1ad FA3.5-316 Incorporates both PI specific valve numbers with their associated Westinghouse valve I:SH 3.5.2.1 (1) and (2) numbers are utilized in the control room.
I 2
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
DOC No. Summary j ITS Section CTS Section
- I. with the ILCO 3".t6 3LCO 1.0.Ta Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance VI A3.6-00 I -%fw%
3.3.13, Table technical requirements. TS.3.5-1, 3.6, guidance of NUREG-1 431. These changes do not change or delete any Table TS.4.1 1C, Table TS.4.1-2B, SR 4.4, and 4.5 LCO 3.6 LCO 3.3.8.1, of APPLICABILITY. The plant ýLCO 3.6 LCO 3.3.13.1, 3.3.8.2, A3.6-03 Replaces general CTS prose descriptions with equivalent ITS MODES 3.6.A.1, Modes to which this specification apply have not been changed.
3,6.A.2, 3.6.B.1, 3.6.C.2, 3.6.D.2, 3.6.G, 3.6.H.1, 3.6.1.1.3.6.1.2, 3.6.J.1, 3.6.J.2, 3.6.K.1, 3.6.K.2, 3.6.L.1, 3.6.M.1, 3.6.M.2.c, 3.6.M.3, and Table 4.1-1C Note 39, SR 4.4.G and 4.4.H.
I Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) ISSeio IT eto I'
Lf~ ~~ .-
Summar-Summat ITS 7-1.1---l",--]
ITS Section LCO 3.6.2,3.6.1, and
_ I CTS Section 1.0 "11 3ONTAIMENT A3.6-05 I
Revise CTS CONTAIMENT INTEGRITY Definition Items 1, 3 and 4 to include in various SRs. 3.6.3 NTEGRITY Specifications and LCO 3.6,SR NA of each CTS 4.4, and 4.5 A3.6-09 1Did not include general CTS Applicability and Obj-.ctive statements at the beginning any operational or and do not impose section. These statements only provide general information technical requirements.
LCO 3.6 LCO 3.3.B.2, The ITS defines all action times from the 3.6.A.2, 3.6.G, A3.6-11 Revises CTS wording for defined times for Required Actions. to the CTS Required Action time. 3.6.1.2, time the first initiated action occurs. Thus the ITS is equivalent 3.6.J.2, 3.6.K.2, 3.6.M.2.c and 3.6.M.3 LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.C.1 penetrations is provided in Note 2 multiple valves in multiple A3.6-19 Clarification of the CTS is provided for guidance for Condition entry for each containment flow path.
an equivalent Note allowing separate LCO3.6 LCO 3.6.C.1 provisions are the same as PI current Notes 3 and 4 A3.6-22 Clarifies intent of CTS for inoperable or leaking barriers. These practice therefore these changes are administrative.
to those penetrations which do not use a
- CTS by adding a Note to apply the requirements Clarifies Conii 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.C.3 ICondition A A3.6-23 closed system as a barrier.
LCO 3.6.C.3 paths with one" to those penetration flow paths A3.6-24 Clarifies CTS by including the clause, "penetration flow flow path with two inoperable barriers is with a single inoperable barrier. The Condition for a penetration 1 addressed separately.
[LCO 3.6.3 is to be deactivated when a containment isolation valve 13.6.C.3.(b)
A3.6-26 IClarifies CTS wording which allows a valve inoperable.
S... ...................
"'"2 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) r --------------- " I I DOC No. Summary ITS Section CTS Section A3.6-42 Clarifies CTS stating that entry into LCO 3.6.1 is required if airlock leakage exceeds the Containment LCO 3.6.2 LCO 3.6.M Leakage Rate Test Program acceptance criteria. This is the same action the plant would take under the CTS.
A3.6-48 Clarifies CTS by providing two Notes. These changes are editorial and are consistent with PI operating SR 3.6.2.1 SR 4.4.A.2 practices and technical requirements. and 4.5.A.2.a A3.6-49 Clarifies intent of CTS actions for two inoperable doors in an air lock if both doors in the same air lock are LCO 3.6.2, LCO 3.6.M.1 inoperable. Conditions A and B A3.6-54 Clarifies CTS SR Frequency for a functional test of the containment vacuum breakers to be provided SR 3.6.8.1 Table 4.1-1C quarterly consistent with current PI procedures. Function 10 A3.6-62 Restates CTS requirements for the inservice purge penetration leakage.
A3.6-77 Clarifies CTS requirements by entering a reactor shutdown track per LCO 3.0.C. LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.D.2.e Conditions D, and E 1.. .. . . - . . ... .... . ,.. -,. -, ---------
. ., . . . ,-,ff. . . . ! "A * .- ;.l-;--
A3.6-80 Clarifies CTS requirements for testing of containment spray ana spray additive valves. i nese changes ISR 3.6.6.4 do not change the type or number of valves which are tested under CTS. SRH 4.5.B.3,.t.
3 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
_a_.__
_-_-_ _-_I_ -__- r- -- - . . - -
-1
[
'ISt 3 section LCO 3 t I3.u, Fl nI"t1-1 uuu no. I rA3.7-00
. . .U lllllg 'J Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not ISection 3.7 Section 3.7 11Table TS.3.5 3.6.D, rLCO3.4, 2B, 3.3.C, change or delete any technical requirements. 3.7, 3.7.A.5(a),
3.8.B, 3.13, Table TS.4.1 2A, Table TS.4.1-2B, SR 4.4.8, 4.5, 4.7, 4.8, 4.14, 4.15, and 4.20 NA LCO 3.4,3.13, LCO SRs 4.7,3.4, 4.8, 3.13, at the beginning of each CTS section. ýIA A3.7-01 Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements impose any operational or technical 4.14, 4.15 and do not These statements only provided general information and 4.20 requirements.
LCO 3.7.1, LCO 3.4 0.1, ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The LCO 3.7.5, 3.7.4,3.7.1, 3.4.8,3.4.A, A3.7-02 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent 3.7.7, and 3.3.C.1 .a, changed.
plant MODES to which this specification apply have not 3.7.12 3.3.D, 3.E.
and 3.6.F MODES of APPLICABILITY. The LCO 3.7.1 Cond 1 3CO
.4.B.2,3.4.A.2, rA3.7-04 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent ITS B, 3.7.4 Cond 3.3.C.l.b, plant MODES to which this specification apply have not changed. C, 3.7.5 Cond C, 3.7.6 Cond 3.3.D.2 and B, 3.7.7 Cond B 3.13.A.2 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.7.9 Cond D, and 3.7.10 Cond A and C 1
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
ir- ITS SectIon OTS Section Summary, ,- ' ITS Section CTS Section DOC No. 1--
L.- - - - . -
v
' LCO 3.7.1 LCO 3.4.A.2, 3.4.B.2, 3.4.D, equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The-A3.7-05 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with apply have not changed. Cond B, 3.7.4 3.3.C.1 .b, plant MODES to which the listed specifications Cond C, 3.7.5 3.3.D.2, Cond C, 3.7.6 3.13.A.2 and Cond B, 3.7.7 3.6.E.1.
Cond B, 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.7.9 Cond D, 3.7.10 Cond A, C, F, 3.7.12 Cond B and C, and 3.7.14 Cond A is initiated. Thne ITS LCO 3.7.1 Cond LCO 3.4.A.2, CTS defined times for required actions from the time a new action the ITS is equivalent to B, 3.7.4 Cond 3.4.B.2,,
Clarifies the first initiated action occurs. Thus, A3.7-06 defines all action times from the time C, 3.7.5 Cond 3.3.C.1 .b, the CTS required action time. C, 3.7.6 Cond 3.3.D.2, B, 3.7.7 Cond B, 3.13.A.2 and 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.6.E.1.
3.7.9 Cond D, 3.7.10 Cond F, and 3.7.12 Cond B and C requirements are iLco 3.4.B.1.b operating in the ITS LCO such that the jLCO 3.7.5 Includes AFW requirements for two units a separate statement for two unit operation is not A3.7-09 the same for each operating unit. Therefore, intent of the CTS.
the required. This change is consistent with This contained in one specification into separate specifications in the ITS. LCO 3.7.6 Cond LCO 3.4.B.2 3.4.8.2 iDivides OTS requirements LCO B 3.7.6 Cond ILCO A3.7-20 Iis consistent with PI operational practices.
I I i testing. This is consistent LCO 3.7.5.2 LCO 3.4.B.2.a 3.7-21 Clarifies CTS requirements for completion of turbine driven AFW pump Note Awith current PI operating practices.
2 1_::
I.I-,,,,,,4ITC*
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
OTS Section I I SICTS
-r.sI
-. - Section ITS Se11- cti0on ectionI -i liua ". . . .. -
Fi UU
-um O
u.
.o .. - .
I IC 3.f~3"7.7 LCO 3.3.C.1 or two unit operations. This is I V *Qf. I. I Did not include CTS specifications requiring restrictions on single unit practices.
A3.7-36 included in the intent of the ITS and does not change any operational Cond LCO 3.3.D.2.a to state "No safeguards pumps LCO 3.7.8 CO 3.7.8 Cond LCO 3.3.D.2.a A3.7-44 Restates CTS requirements for safeguards CL pump inoperability same as the CTS requirements BI the OPERABLE for one train..." This statement is substantively with no change in operational practices.
LCO 3.7.8and Cond 3.3.D.2.a.(1) with the general ITS B, 3.0.6, A3.7-45 Replaces explicit specific system wording of CTS action requirements with no technical changes. 5.5.13 and (2) 5.5.13, requirement LCO 3.0.6 and programmatic ITS requirement LCo with the general ITS Replaces explicit specific system wording of CTS action requirements LCO 3.7.8and C, 3.0.6, Cond LCO 3.3.D.2.b(1)
A3.7-47 and (2) 5.5.13, with no technical changes. 5.5.13 requirement LCO 3.0.6 and programmatic ITS requirement LCO 3.7.10 LCO 3.13.A.1 operation (MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4) and Cond D and E and 3.13.A.2 A3.7-57 Clarifies CTS action statements for CRSVS during plant with PI operating practices.
irradiated fuel handling operations. This is consistent LCO 3.7.12 LCO 3.6.E.1 Restates CTS requirements for Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone Integrity in ITS 3.7.12 Cond B and C A3.7-62 is also revised.
requirements for the ABSVS; thus the title of this section LCO 3.7.16 LCO 3.8.B.1.C R-ewords applicability for fuel handling operations specification, 3.8.B.1 .c, by combining this APPLICABILITY and 3.8.E.2.a A3.7-66 3.8.E.2.a, which expands the specification with the spent fuel pool boron concentration specification, fuel to state the boron concentration is to applicability beyond involving a spent fuel cask containing is stored in the spent fuel pool, consistent be maintained at 1800 ppm at all times when spent fuel with CTS 3.8.E.2.a. LCO 3.7.13 LCO 3.8.D.4 ITS LCO 3.0.3, as a Reference to L00 Action Notes, and 3.8.E.1 A3.7-74 "RestatesReference to CTS LCO 3.0.C which is equivalent to 3.7.16 Cond A, 3.0.3. and 3.7.17 Cond A A of ITS 3.7.17. LCO 3.7.17 _LC0 3.8.E.1 with the titleofT37E A3.7-77 Restates CTS title of this specification to be consistent 3
Prairie Island ITS ttt rnn it,,
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Summary .. " ITS Section CTS Secton nnI DOCn o.S ...
TLCO 3.8.E.2
%F .l--.
with the title and LCO 3.7.16 and A3.7-78 Restates CTS title and terminology within this specification to be consistent ISR 3.7.16. 2aFncTabie 41 or operational changes have been made as a result of this terminology in ITS 3.7.16. No technical 2B Function 131 change.
SR 3.7.... eH 4.A of an actuation signal by ISR 3.7.2.2 SR 4.7 A3.7-83 Restates CTS requirements for testing MSIV closure time upon receipt dividing it into two ITS SRs.
SR 3.7.5.2 and T--SR 4.8.A.8 of entering power operation. SR 3.7.5.2 and -- te4.8.A.8 A3.7-94 Rewords CTS statement that test shall be performed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 3.7.5.4 Note INote 1 in accordance ITS definitions.
POWER OPERATION in this context has been defined as MODE
-- T---- 3.7.7.3 SR 3.7.7.3--- -- leSR 4.5.A.4 each CC system pump starts. ISR SR 4.5.A.4 A3.7-97 Rewords CTS specification with an explicit requirement to verify that This is consistent with the acceptance criteria PI uses for this test.
- -T SR 3.7.12.4 system isolation valves ISR 3.7.12.4 A3.7-105 Restates CTS requirements to test the auxiliary building normal ventilation to the CTS.
or technical changes with the SR. This change does not result in any operational A3.7-113 IRestates CTS Frequency from refueling outage to 24 months. The CTS defines refueling outage as not to exceed 24 months. Therefore, made.
the CTS and ITS are the Frequency for consistent and no
-- -T SR 3.7.7.2, 3.7.7.3, and SR 3.7.7.2, 3.7.8.5 SR 4.5.A.4.a, 4.5.A.5.a, 4.5.B.3.e, 4.5.A.B.3.f.
technical or operational changes are 4
Prairie Island ITS I I .- ^ r
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Section) Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS I -TS-Section.
- -- - - - . 0
'. --- sect.o a ~rj% 0%- -A I - -
.... Summa . LCO 3Sect.on8'ICIO 3ec7aon I IL) L no.II II~ LCO 3.8 RLCO 3.7 and statements. ITS administratively A3.8-01 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective design features, or systems to ýSR 4.6-incorporates these statements within each specification, the plant describing incorporated, into the ITS, which it applies. These statements have been administratively regulatory or operational do not establish any plant design features or systems since they requirements. LCO 3.0.6 and 3.7.B.1 I
-1.LCO 3.7.B.1 for all engineered safety features equipment associated with the LCO 3.8.1 Cond LCO and 3.7.B.3 A3.8-130 Did not include CTS requirements "built in" the format of the ITS and LCO B ILCO D and and3.0.6 OPERABLE DG to be OPERABLE. These requirements are 3.0.6.
LCO 3.8.1 LCO 3.0.C CTS into lack of have any specific LCO 3.8.1 ILCO 3.0.
Clarifies CTS requirements entering LCO 3.0.C due to the Condition G a specific Condition which is to enter Required Actions for the subject Condition. ITS does provide LCO 3.0.3.
____________1 LCO 3.8.1, VAI-IIOUi S.... ý1ý1 1^
A3.8-15 which Specification (s) apply for
[.#A OUS Reformats various CTS requirements by specifically identifying Condition D various plant conditions.
LCO 3.0.6, 3.8.1 LCO LCO 3.7.B A3.8-17 to ITS format and verbiage. In addition, ITS implements LCO 3.0.6 (SFDP) which is LCO 3.0.6, 3.8.1 AC 3.7.B Reformats CTS Cond F, 3.8.4 consistent with current operating practices of Pl. Cond D, 3.8.7 Cond C, and 3.8.9 Cond A 1
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Coo mar T-" -.. ' i ITS Section I CTS Setio*il Fni-n i I.*- *l i .... - - .. .. . -1 II UUV M0.1 instrument AC inverters LCO 3.8.7i LCO 3.7.B.9 A3.8-20 Reformats and clarifies CTS requirements for two reactor protection ConditionBA and inoperable. B LCO and LCO 3.0.C I 3.0.3, and LCO LCO 3.0.3, 3.8.9, ýLCO 3.0.C A3.8-22 Clarifies CTS by adding a specific Required Action to enter LCO 3.0.3 in the event that two trains This is consistent with the Condition E with inoperable distribution subsystems result in a loss of safety function.
Actions for this Condition, the intent and practices of PI. Since the CTS does not have any specific plant would enter LCO 3.0.C. LC.. 3.8.. L U l power subsystem components when ILCO 3.8.5 ILCO 3.7.8 A3.8-23 Clarifies CTS requirements for the service building electrical during a plant outage. This is being used for the safeguards DC electrical power subsystems past operating practices.
consistent with current plant procedures plant design, and SRe I-"-- bli M..~. -:; .0 quantity. This change ISR 3.8.3.1 ISR 4.6.A.1 .b A3.8-25 Revises CTS fuel oil storage tank level to specify the total available fuel oil provides an accurate description of the PI design.
started at a time. This is current PI
~Clarifies CTS staiements by stating that only one DG be 19R3..1.3 Note SR 4.6.A.1 A3.8-30 3 operating practices.
__________________________ NA T SR 4.6.A.1.e,
ý NA SR 4.6.A.l.e, 4.6.A.2.c, and A3.8-38 ' Did not include CTS non-pertinent information. 4.6.A.3.b.2 SR 3.8.3.2 SR 4.6.A.I.c properties of new and stored A3.8-39 Clarifies OTS by specifically stating the requirements to verify fuel oil fuel oil. This is consistent with current plant procedures and practices.
NA SR 4.6.A.1.d that the fuel oil transfer pump is INA ISR 4.6.A.1.d A3.8-40 Did not include non-pertinent CTS information by specifically stating been started.
started and operating. If the pump is operating then it has 2
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
Section . II CTS I -A --. - I I
5 ectionI -1 0%.rg-%
S. ...*.summiary
- . ,"S DOC No. T.-I A OM..0-A ..
INA ISR4.6.A.l.e A3.8-51 Did not include non-pertinent CTS information.
with verify.
A3.8-53 Clarifies CTS requirements by replacing the word tested NA ILCO 3.7.A and 4.
A3.8-56 Did not include CTS descriptive wording for MODES 1,2,3, LCO 3.8.1 LCO 3.7.B OPERABLE DG is not inoperable due to Condition B A3.B-57 Clarifies CTS wording requiring determination that the common cause failure.
SRF3.8.1.2 R4.6.A..e accurately reflect PI testing of the DGs.
A3.8-58 Frevises CTS adding specific verbiage to more SR 3.8.1.6 SR 4.6.A.2.a testing requirements.
A3.8-60 Reformatted CTS SR clarifying voltage and frequency SR 3.8.6.6 SR 4.6.8.4 SClarifies CTIS requirements for the battery discharge test. For batteries during the first refueling and S§R -3.8.6.6- SR 4.6.6.4 A3.8-62 once every 5 years thereafter.
LCO 3.8.9 CondLCO 3.7.8.6 AEO3i6ýý~j ..
480V bus including associated A3.8-63 Clarifies CTS that one 4 kW safeguards bus and/or its associated pro sided the 4 kV safeguards bus and its JA MCC may be Inoperable or not fully energized for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and the DGs and safeguards associated 480V safeguards buses are verified to be OPERABLE equipment associated with the redundant train are OPERABLE.
I LCO 3.n.3,d INA be restored to within limits, declare the
,A3.8-68 Clarifies CTS intent by stating that ifthe'DG fuel oil cannotRequired Actions of LCO 3.7.8. 3.8.3.D Condition DGs inoperable and enter the applicable Conditions and LCO 3
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
[ -.ITS Section CTS Section I DOCNo.
.Suhmma. __-i,.-
- -. -- nfl"D4 INA ILCO 3.7.B.6.a A3.8-70 Does not include a one time relief for performing modificatuuur-uu. and b I - --...-------. ---- -- -. --
4 iý,ri, IlnInd ITR
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
. I ITS Section OTS Section
- '*, .ITS Section CT S ection II able n I Crf TS.1-1 FE LjwLlrIll rA3.9-00 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the 1CO 3.9 IL-OW%....
3Table TS.Ia-1.
TS.4.1-2A, and guidance of NUREG-1431. Table TS.4.1-2B LCO 3.9 LCO 3.8 at the beginning of each CTS ILCO 3.9 ILCO 3.8 A3.9-02 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements not impose any operational or section. These statements only provide general information and do technical requirements. that each specification In the Refueling O)perations Section contains its Revises CTS format such . LCO
- 3. 3 .8 AA
. A.
are marked up to correspond to these Applicabilities ýLCO 3.9 LCO 3.8.A.1 A3.9-03 own Applicability and the CTS specifications T... - -
are met" clarifying the intent of the ILCO 3.9.1 I able 1 -1 A3.9-05 Rewords CTS by adding the words "when connected" and "limits CTS.
L003.9.4
- - r. -- - - - -
to hold the equipment hatch in ILCO 3.9.4 ILCO 3.8.A.1 .a.1 W3-.9-06 Clarifies CTS that containment closure requires four bolts required the CTS.
place when it is considered closed which is consistent with (that is by Restates CTS requirements which allow for at least one isolation valve to be OPERABLE LCO 3.9.4 LCO 38.A.1.a.1 LCO 3.9.4 LCO 3.8.A.1 .a.1 automatic closure) or locked.
A3.9-107 I1--- - -
' Rewords CTS requirements for isolation of lines which penetrate containment and provide a direct ILCO 3.9.4 ILCO 3.8.A.1 .a.1 path from containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere.
______ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ I. - M Af
- %&% 12I A 4- P2 ILCO 3.9.4 S......
Rewords CTS requirements making minor editorial changes.
3.8A lA . 2 A3.9-12 I
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section) tu:' S.....,,. .-*.,, .< I. ITS Section. I TS5Section,. ICT CTS Section
',SSectiorn
- ...b....aflt - I -
nntr Un- . . b- a ..' .
FE UUV FIQ. ANaA2LCO in containment" as the basis for A3.9-1 4 Did not include CTS clause, "following a fuel handling accident Ir 13.8.A.1 .a.2.b fan coil. Itis understood that the purpose requiring an OPERABLE air lock or operating containment of a fuel handling accident in containment since of this Specification is to mitigate the consequences that is the regulatory basis for a Refueling Operations LCO.
LCO 3.9 LCO 3.8.A.1.d with the ISTS. ILCO 3.9 ILCO 3.8.A.1.d A3.9-26 IRestates CTS Applicability statements consistent LCD 3.9.2 LCD 3.8.A.1.e assemblies "in LCO 3.9.2 ýLCO 3.8.A.1.e A3.9-28 Restates CTS applicability of this specification to apply to movement of fuel containment".
LCO 3.9.2, -i I--- 8..2an I
LCO I I I 3.9.2,A, -I.-LCO 3.8.A.2 and for each individual Condition VA3.9-47 Clarifies CTS Action Statements to incorporate the Applicability changes 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.8.A.3 specification were discussed previously.
Condition A, 3.9.5, Condition A. and 3.9.6
________________________________________________It_______1.M n A 13-boron concentration. LCO 3.9.5 and ILCOU 3.8.A.3 3.9.6 A3.9-48 Restates CTS requirements allowing for not reducing 38..
3.9.6 an3.9.5LC ILCO 3.8.A.3 A3.9-50 1Clarifies CTS requirements for equipment hatch and penetration closure. LCO LCO 3.9.2 LCU 3.B.A.2 and the water level is ILCO 3.9.2 ILCO 3.8.A.2 A3.9-52 Clarifies CTS required actions for when the one RHR pump is not operating below 20 ft above the reactor vessel flange.
2 Prairie Island ITS i,oi, '.Anng
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 4.0 - Design Features (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
-S
- Setion CTS Section Summary .- . -- * ,_
DOC No. ... ,-
A4.0-00 I.ýEditorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the 15.16 5.3, and guidance of NURGE-1 431. 15.6,- -
1 4.2 5.3.A format. 14.2 ý5.3.A A4.0-02 Revises CTS description of the reactor core to conform to ISTS 4.3.1 5.6.A new fuel storage and change 4.3.1 5.6.A A4.0-06 Revises CTS requirements to include a statement for the spacing of location of the information.
references to other sections of the CTS to agree with the ITS 4.3.2 the pool which 14.3.2 the spent fuel pool design prevents draining A4.0-07 Includes a new statement specifying that replaces CTS statements.
4.3.3
____1 5.6.D 14.3.3 A4.0-09 IRevises CTS description of fuel storage capacity. I5.6.D I
4.3.1 5.6.A.3 14.3.1 5.6.A.3 A4.0-1 1 Includes reference to TN-40 earlier in the paragraph.
1 Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 5.0 - Administrative Controls Section)
(DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS 4*-, '.-' * .7 ITS Section CTh Se".tlon -I
. - .5. .* a ITS Section tCTS Sention m" n DOC No. -, -
i;7 . Lm-I These changes do not 16.1 A5.0-00 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording.
change or delete any technical requirements.
5.0I
-t_ - I-,4.12.A surveillance Program as an 15.0 4.12.A 15.0-04 Restates CTS requirements to the Steam Generator (SG) tube administrative control requirement.
5.0 4.12.E Program in the administrative 15.0 Restates CTS requirements for Steam Generator (SG) tube surveillance rA5.0-05 controls.
5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 A5.0-06 Revises section, paragraph, numbering, and punctuation.
5.0 6.5.L.2.b 15.0 16.5.L.2.b A5.0-07 Rewords CTS requirements to be consistent with 10CRF50.59.
NA 6.2.B they are included in 10 CFR50.54(m)(i)(iii) INA 16.2.B A5.0-11 Did not include CTS requirements for shift manning since and 50.54(k). 6.2 and 6.5 5.00 16.2 and 6.5 job titles. F5.
A5.0-1 2 Replaces CTS specific personnel job titles with general 5.22. 6.-2 -And- A with ISTS as currently modified by travelers. ý52.2.b 16.2 and 6.4 A5.0-1 3 Revises CTS minor wording changes to make it consistent NA
-F. 1^ ý "
of the example systems in the INA 16.531 A5.0-14 Did not include CTS containment spray system (CS), by design, as one primary coolant sources outside containment.
5.3 71
___________ '1 6.3 11 with 10 CFR 55.4 requirements. 6.3 A5.o.16 Clarifies to assure proper understanding when complying 5.3 15.5.14 ..
4.0.A and 4.0.B to properly interlace With tA5.0-24 Revises requirements with respect to the applicability of CTS J.
the ITS SR 3.0.3 requirements and 10 CFR 50 Appendix 1
Prairie Island ITS
Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 5.0 - Administrative Controls (DOC No. are numbered sequentially by ITS Section)
OO~o, Smnayo - vi~ ~- 'I1T5S ection CtS Section combining 5.6.1 6.6.A, 6.6.B A5.0-26 Clarifies reporting requirements stating that a single submittal may be made for the plant 6.6.C sections common to a two unit plant.,and power operated NA 6.6.D A5.0-27 Did not include"CTS requirements for monthly reporting of challenges to the pressurizer relief valves or pressurizer safety valves.
5.5.5 6.5.E A5.0-28 Includes COLR reference to latest Prairie Island Plant approved steam line break methodology.
which reference 5.6.5 6.6.E A5.0-31 Replaces CTS list of limits and corresponding TS with a new list of ITS specifications which references the COLR or the COLR. Each of these ITS specifications either corresponds to a CTS justification was previously provided in the appropriate ITS package for relocating the limit to the COLR.
reference the 5.6.6 6.6.F A5.0-32 Replaces CTS list of TS referencing the PTLR with a new list of ITS specifications whichthe PTLR or PTLR. Each of these ITS specifications either corresponds to a CTS which references the limit to the PTLR.
justification was previously provided in the appropriate ITS package for relocating to those 5.7 6.7 A5.0-33 Revises CTS requirements for high radiation area updating the acceptable alternate controls that currently given in 10 CFR 20.1601 which provide an equivalent level of radiation protection to provided.
which will 5.7.1 and 6.7.A and A5.0-34 Revises CTS Section titles to agree with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 8.38 6.7.B radiation exposure. 15.7.2 assure that adequate protection is provided without unnecessary 5.5.i516.5 A5.0-36 Restates P! requirements for battery monitoring and maintenance.
'5.0 5.6 A5.0-38 Restates CTS reporting requirement for EM as an administrative report.
D).-Arn lelnnrl ITRq