ML022380254

Brief of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in Response to Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-02-18

ML022380254
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	08/22/2002
From:	Repka D Pacific Gas & Electric Co, Winston & Strawn
To:	NRC/OCM
Byrdsong A T
References
+adjud/rulemjr200506, 50-275-LT, 50-323-LT, CLI-02-18, RAS 4774
Download: ML022380254 (60)

Text

"~RAS 4774L August 22, 2002 UNITEI5'STATES OF AMERICA DOCKETED USNRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION August 23, 2002 (3:24PM)

BEFORE THE COMMISSION OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF In the Matter of: ))

) Docket Nos. 50-275-LT Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ) 50-323-LT

)

(Diablo Canyon Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2)

BRIEF OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLI-02-18 "7i~-vy~ ie - recqv- &ecVozL-.

J TABLE OF CONTENTS 1

I. IN TR ODU CTIO N ..................................................................................................................

1 II. B A CKG ROUN D ....................................................................................................................

3 III. D ISCU SSION .....................................................................................................................

A. Background on the Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions ....................................... 3 Authority to Retain Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions ...................................... 7 B.

C O NCLU SION ................................................................................................................. 12 IV .

Exhibit 1: Amendment Nos. I and 4 to CPPR-39 and CPPR-69 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant), Roger S. Boyd (NRC) to John C. Morrissey (PG&E), dated December 6, 1978.

Exhibit 2: Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Receipt of Attorney General's Advice and Time for Filing of Petitions to Intervene on Antitrust Matters, 41 Fed. Reg. 20,225 (May 17, 1976).

Exhibit 3: Letter, Jerome Saltzman (NRC) to John C. Morrissey (PG&E), "Re: Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2," dated September 15, 1978.

Exhibit 4: Letter, John C. Morrissey (PG&E) to Jerome Saltzman (NRC), "Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2," dated September 19, 1978.

Exhibit 5: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2);

Issuance of Amendment to Construction Permits, 43 Fed. Reg. 59,934 (December 22, 1978).

i

J TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL STATUTES 4

42 U .S.C . § 2132(a) ...........................................................................................................................

42 U .S.C . § 2132(b) ........................................................................................................................... 4 4

42 U .S.C . § 2135(c)(2) .......................................................................................................................

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CASES Ala. Power Co. (Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2), ALAB-646, 13 NRC 1027 (1981) .......................................................................................................................... 9 Kan. Gas & Elec. Co. (Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1), CLI-99-19, 7, 8 49 NR C 441(1999) .............................................................................................................................

La. Power & Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Generating Station, Unit 3),

9 CLI-73-25, 6 AEC 619 (1973) ....................................................................................................

Metropolitan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1), LBP-81-32, 10 14 NRC 381, (1981) ...........................................................................................................................

8 Ohio Edison Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1), CLI-92-11, 36 NRC 47 (1992) ..............

6 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-77-26, 5 NRC 1017 (1977) .........

6 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-83-2, 17 NRC 45 (1983) ......

PrivateFuel Storage,L.L. C. (Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation), LBP-00-6, 51 NR C 101 (2000) ............................................................................................................................ 10 FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2);

6 Issuance of Amendment to Construction Permits, 43 Fed. Reg. 59,934 (Dec. 22, 1978) ........

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Receipt of Attorney General's Advice and Time for 5

Filing Petitions to Intervene on Antitrust Matters, 41 Fed. Reg. 20,225 (May 17, 1976) ............

ii

August 22, 2002 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of: ))

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ) Docket Nos. 50-275-LT

) 50-323-LT (Diablo Canyon Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2) )

BRIEF OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLI-02-18 I. INTRODUCTION In Memorandum and Order CLI-02-18, issued on August 1, 2002, the proceeding, as well Commission invited the applicant and the petitioners in this license transfer and the United as the California Public Utilities Commission, the County of San Luis Obispo, has statutory States Department of Justice, to address the question "whether the Commission plants licensed authority to retain or impose antitrust conditions for commercial nuclear power

('TG&E") herein under [Atomic Energy Act] Section 104.b." Pacific Gas and Electric Company to impose new responds. PG&E concludes that the NRC does not have the statutory authority However, under the antitrust conditions in connection with the proposed license transfer.

to retain the unusual circumstances of this case, the NRC does have discretionary authority previously adopted antitrust conditions, modified to apply to PG&E's successors.

II. BACKGROUND to This proceeding relates to PG&E's application for NRC approval, pursuant "Act"), and 10 C.F.R.

Section 184 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended ("AEA" or 1

§ 50.80, of a proposed direct transfer of the operating licenses for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ("DCPP"). In PG&E's application, dated November 30, 2001, PG&E licenses in support of a requested the NRC's approval of the transfer of the DCPP operating will allow PG&E to pay comprehensive Plan of Reorganization ("Plan") for PG&E. The Plan the employment of its current allowed claims in full, with interest, restore equity value, continue work force, and emerge from the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.

and As discussed elsewhere in more detail, the Plan calls for a disaggregation The majority of the restructuring of the operations and the assets of PG&E's business lines.

will be contributed to assets and liabilities associated with PG&E's electric transmission business and liabilities will be ETrans LLC ("ETrans"); the majority of PG&E's gas transmission assets and liabilities associated contributed to GTrans LLC ("GTrans"); and the majority of the assets to Electric Generation with PG&E's generation business, including DCPP, will be contributed LLC ("Gen") or to its subsidiaries. ETrans, GTrans, and Gen all will be wholly-owned (which will be renamed).

subsidiaries of PG&E's parent company, PG&E Corporation and will continue to Reorganized PG&E will retain most of the remaining assets and liabilities, customer services.

conduct local electric and gas distribution operations and associated Corporation.

Reorganized PG&E will be separated ("spun off') from re-named PG&E license The NRC operating licenses for DCPP presently include antitrust conditions (the so-called "Stanislaus Commitments"). With respect to these antitrust license connection with the license conditions, PG&E is not proposing any substantive changes in be carried forward transfer. Rather, PG&E has proposed that the antitrust license conditions as licensees specifically intact. Gen, ETrans, and Reorganized PG&E would be designated purposes with respect to responsible for the antitrust conditions. In effect, for NRC enforcement 2

T7 the antitrust conditions, Gen, ETrans and Reorganized PG&E would be jointly and severally responsible for the antitrust conditions. PG&E's proposal is specifically supported by the Northern California Power Agency ("NCPA")' and the Transmission Agency of Northern 2

et al, the petitioners in this matter with antitrust interests.

California ("TANC"),

III. DISCUSSION A. Background on the Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions As recognized by the Commission in CLI-02-18, both DCPP units were (and (or remain) licensed to operate under Section 104.b of the AEA. The Section 104 designation issued on class of license) resulted from the fact that the DCPP construction permits were April 23, 1968 (Unit 1) and December 9, 1970 (Unit 2) - both prior to the December 1970 amendments to the AEA. Section 104.b licenses issued prior to enactment of the 1970 and amendments were generally exempt from antitrust review under Section 105 of the AEA, therefore generally did not include antitrust license conditions.

The 1970 amendments to the AEA resulted from P.L.91-560, enacted on of December 19, 1970. Congress at that time specifically amended the licensing provisions as Section 102 of the Act and recast the antitrust review provisions of Section 105.c. The AEA, of the amended, requires that licenses for commercial power reactors issued after the date See "Petition of the Northern California Power Agency for Leave to Intervene, Conditional Request for Hearing and Suggestion that Proceeding Be Held In Abeyance,"

dated February 6, 2002 ("NCPA Petition"), at 19, 28-29; "Brief of the Northern California Power Agency on Specific Questions," dated May 10, 2002, at 18.

2 See "Petition for Leave To Intervene, Comments, Request for Deferral or, in the Alternative, Request for Hearing of the Transmission Agency of Northern California, of Santa M-S-R Public Power Agency, Modesto Irrigation District, the California Cities Clara, Redding, and Palo Alto and the Trinity Public Utility District," dated February 6, of 2002 ("TANC Petition"), at 19-21; "Brief of Petitioners Transmission Agency District, and the Northern California, M-S-R- Public Power Agency, Modesto Irrigation at 15, 17.

California Cities of Santa Clara, Redding, and Palo Alto," dated May 10, 2002, 3

amendment be issued under Section 103. See AEA § 102.a; 42 U.S.C. § 2132(a). Further, the AEA, as amended, requires the Commission to conduct antitrust reviews of applications for 42 construction permits and operating licenses issued under Section 103. See AEA § 105.c(2);

U.S.C. § 2135 (c)(2). Plants with Section 104.b construction permits as of December 19, 1970, such as DCPP, were generally "grandfathered" under the 1970 amendments from antitrust for review. See AEA § 102.b; 42 U.S.C. § 2132(b). That is, the operating license applications 3

4 Section 104.b construction permit holders were not subject to antitrust review.

Notwithstanding the Section 104.b status of the DCPP licenses, the DCPP operating licenses presently include the Stanislaus Commitments as antitrust license conditions.

The Stanislaus Commitments were added to the DCPP construction permits by the NRC, with the consent of PG&E, by amendment dated December 6, 1978. (A copy of the NRC's amendment is provided as Exhibit 1 hereto.) These license conditions were carried forward into the DCPP operating licenses when those licenses were issued in November 1984 and August 1985. The Stanislaus Commitments derived from the Section 105 pre-licensing antitrust review However, under Section 105.c(3), Section 104.b licenses could have been subject to a Section 105 antitrust review if they were "reverse-grandfathered." This could have occurred if any person had intervened or petitioned to intervene in the construction permit proceeding to address "antitrust considerations." After the 1970 amendments, upon a timely written request to the Commission, such a person could have obtained a Section 105 antitrust review in connection with the operating license for the "reverse grandfathered" plant. It does not appear that DCPP fell into this category of Section 104.b licensees that were subjected to an operating license antitrust review.

Prior to the 1970 amendments, antitrust reviews were triggered only by a Commission finding of "practical value" for a class of licenses under Section 102 of the Act. Had a practical value finding been made for commercial reactors, the Commission would have begun issuing Section 103 licenses to facilities within the class and then only after a pre licensing antitrust review. The 1970 amendments deleted the Section 102 language the which had provided for the "practical value finding." The amendments substituted current language which states, in effect, that licenses issued after the date of enactment (December 19, 1970) shall be issued under Section 103.

4

of of PG&E's proposed (and later canceled) Stanislaus Nuclear Project, not from antitrust review either the DCPP construction permit or operating license applications.

The Stanislaus Commitments were originally made by PG&E to the United States review of the Department of Justice ("DOJ") in connection with DOJ's pre-licensing antitrust of April 30, Stanislaus project. The commitments were made in a letter from PG&E to DOJ that no 1976. The commitments provided DOJ with the basis to recommend to the Commission for the antitrust hearing would be necessary in connection with a construction permit application NRC dated Stanislaus project. DOJ's recommendation was stated in an advice letter to the a notice of receipt of the DOJ advice letter.5 May 5, 1976. On May 17, 1976, the NRC issued commitments The NRC notice includes the full text of PG&E's commitment letter to DOJ, the provided as themselves, and DOJ's advice letter to the Commission. (A copy of the notice is Exhibit 2 hereto.)

In connection with the Stanislaus Commitments, and as reflected in the letters included in the Commission's 1976 notice, PG&E also agreed that:

In the event that PG&E's application for a construction permit for the Stanislaus Nuclear Project Unit 1 is withdrawn, or that a construction permit for such unit is not issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission prior to July 1, 1978, PG&E is willing to have its license(s) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear 6

Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, amended to incorporate the commitments.

7 Rather, No construction permit for the Stanislaus project was ever issued.

15, 1978, consistent with the July 1, 1978 deadline set in the commitment above, on September Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Receipt of Attorney General's Advice and Time for Filing Petitions to Intervene on Antitrust Matters, 41 Fed. Reg. 20,225 (May 17, 1976).

6 41 Fed. Reg. at 20,226, col. 2.

7 The history of the Stanislaus Nuclear Project is beyond the scope of the Commission's present question. Suffice it to say here, several interested parties, including NCPA, 5

I.

the NRC - apparently on its own initiative - sent a letter (a copy is provided as Exhibit 3 hereto) to PG&E advising as follows:

To date a construction permit for the Stanislaus Nuclear Project Unit 1 has not been issued. Accordingly, in keeping with the above quoted Company commitment, this is to advise you that it is our present intention to amend Construction Permits CPPR-39 and CPPR-69 issued to the Company on April 23, 1968 and December 9, 1970, respectively, for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 to incorporate as conditions the Statement of Commitments appended to the Company's letter of April 30, 1976. We expect these amendments to be8 issued pursuant to the Commission's regulations sometime in October.

of the PG&E replied on September 19, 1978, stating that it "has no objection to the amendment as Construction Permits as proposed in your letter." (A copy of PG&E's letter is provided 9

Exhibit 4 hereto). The construction permit amendment discussed above ensued shortly thereafter. See Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 1978).

2); Issuance of Amendment to Construction Permits, 43 Fed. Reg. 59,934 (Dec. 22, (Exhibit 5 hereto is a copy of the notice of the amendment.)

in disagreed with the DOJ recommendation that no NRC antitrust hearing was necessary connection with the Stanislaus application and, accordingly, requested a hearing. A to licensing board was appointed to preside. The licensing board granted the petitions intervene and requests for hearing of NCPA and others. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co.

(Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-77-26, 5 NRC 1017 (1977). Litigation was actively pursued for several years thereafter. The licensing proceeding was eventually terminated in 1983, after PG&E's decision not to pursue the project. See Pac. Gas &

Elec. Co. (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-83-2, 17 NRC 45 (1983) (granting PG&E's motion to withdraw its construction permit application without prejudice).

Letter, Jerome Saltzman, Chief, Antitrust and Indemnity Group, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, to John C. Morrissey, Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E, dated September 15, 1978.

Letter, John C. Morrissey, Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E, to Jerome Saltzman, Chief, Antitrust and Indemnity Group, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated September 19, 1978.

6

B. Authority to Retain Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions In the proposed license transfer application that is the subject of this proceeding, PG&E does not propose deleting the existing antitrust license conditions. Under the proposal, be jointly and those license conditions would remain in place, with new licensees designated to in interest to the severally responsible for compliance with those conditions as the successors current licensee, PG&E.10 However, the Commission questions whether it has statutory under Section authority to "retain or impose" antitrust conditions for nuclear plants licensed authority to 104.b of the Act. PG&E concludes that the NRC would not have the statutory However, impose new antitrust conditions in connection with the proposed license transfer.

the previously PG&E concludes that the NRC does have discretionary authority to retain licensed under imposed antitrust conditions for DCPP, notwithstanding that the units were to retain the Section 104.b. While neither Section 104.b nor Section 105 compels the NRC this case make conditions (as modified to apply to new licensees), the unique circumstances of such an action possible.

The Commission has previously held, upon a thorough, de novo review of the to conduct AEA and the legislative history, that the agency does not have statutory authority Kan. Gas &

antitrust reviews in connection with post-operating license transfer applications.

447-59 (1999).

Elec. Co. (Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1), CLI-99-19, 49 NRC 441, or Section 104.b Therefore, in connection with such a license transfer, whether for a Section 103 license, the NRC could not impose new antitrust conditions based upon a review 10 The Commission's authority to apply the license conditions to the successors was Among other discussed in PG&E's May 10, 2002, brief in response to CLI-02-12.

and its things, the license conditions themselves state that they apply to PG&E successors.

7

of the post-transfer competitive landscape. The fact that Section 104.b licensees were originally exempted from antitrust review serves only to strengthen, for this class of facilities, the Wolf transfers.

Creek conclusion regarding the agency's statutory authority in the context of license In Wolf Creek, however, the Commission recognized that even where it had no license statutory authority to conduct new antitrust reviews in connection with a post-operating conditions transfer, it still had the authority to "consider the fate of any existing antitrust license under the transferred license." The Commission emphasized that it "plainly has continuing CLI-99-19, 49 authority to modify or revoke its own validly imposed contentions." Wolf Creek, CLI-92-11, 36 NRC at 466 n.23 (citing Ohio Edison Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1),

for the existing NRC 47, 54-59 (1992)). One option the Commission suggested in Wolf Creek similar to PG&E's pending proposal - to "modify antitrust conditions was the option -

apply references to licensees in the conditions when existing licensees to whom the conditions will result." Wolf merge among themselves or with other entities and new corporate licenses Creek, CLI-99-19, 49 NRC at 466. It would appear that this authority to choose to retain, respect to Section modify, or even delete existing, valid antitrust conditions must exist with 104.b licenses as well as Section 103 licenses.

An argument that the Commission does not have authority to retain existing and would be antitrust conditions in Section 104.b licenses could be premised upon -

tantamount to - an argument that the antitrust conditions were not validly imposed in the first situations not place, because Section 104.b licenses were not (except in certain defined not fit the applicable here) subject to statutory antitrust review. However, the argument does in the context of DCPP circumstances, where PG&E specifically consented to the conditions conditions to another Section 105 antitrust review, and where the Commission duly added those 8

the DCPP licenses in accordance with NRC regulations and procedures. Moreover, PG&E is not willing to presume that these conditions - which were added to the construction permit over 20 years ago and that have been in effect ever since - were not "validly imposed" based on PG&E's consent.

As discussed above, the Stanislaus Commitments were not incorporated into the DCPP licenses under Section 105 authority applicable to DCPP. The conditions were an under outgrowth of the NRC's pre-licensing antitrust review of the Stanislaus project, authorized agreement AEA Section 105. They were incorporated into the DCPP licenses based on PG&E's conditions in and DOJ's recommendation to the NRC. Certainly PG&E's consent to the antitrust exist 1978 conferred discretionary authority on the NRC, even if authority did not otherwise The authority

-under the AEA in connection with DCPP, to adopt the antitrust license conditions.

to to add antitrust conditions to the DCPP licenses derived from the agency's inherent discretion or otherwise adopt conditions (even if beyond the scope of existing requirements) to settle 1 Metropolitan resolve a contested matter based on the commitments of the applicant. " See, e.g.,

With respect to the Section 105 antitrust review of the Stanisla'is project, the AEA the conferred upon the NRC broad jurisdiction to consider antitrust implications of of the proposed license and to fashion remedies. Specifically, under Section 105.c(5) under Act, the NRC (and DOJ) antitrust review must determine "whether the activities antitrust laws. ... "

the license would create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the the The scope of review is ordinarily limited by a required nexus to activities under turns upon the proposed license, but it has been held that the "proper scope of review Electric circumstances of each case." La. Power & Light Co. (Waterford Steam (1973). Under Section Generating Station, Unit 3), CLI-73-25, 6 AEC 619, 620-21 findings 105.c(6) of the Act, the NRC is authorized to fashion remedies to address any Power Co. (Joseph M.

from its Section 105.c(5) review. The Appeal Board in Alabama Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2), ALAB-646, 13 NRC 1027, 1098-1100 (1981),

is not observed that the limiting phrase "activities under the license" of Section 105.c(5) has "wide in Section 105.c(6) governing the scope of relief and that the Commission the discretion" in fashioning relief. Nonetheless, it is doubtful that this discretion under a facility of the statute would extend to imposing license conditions on the license for review.

applicant separate from the facility that is the subject of the pre-licensing antitrust 9

Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1), LBP-81-32, 14 NRC 381, 563-82 (1981)(in issuing partial initial decision on the matter of management capability to restart TMI-1, the Licensing Board relied upon a number of licensee commitments made in connection with settlement of several contested issues, making them conditions under which the plant would operate if permitted to restart), remanded on other grounds, ALAB-772, 19 NRC 1193 (1984);

affid in part,rev'd in part, and clarified,CLI-85-2, 21 NRC 282 (1985); cf.PrivateFuel Storage, L.L.C. (Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation), LBP-00-6, 51 NRC 101, 121 (2000)

(board held that reasonable assurance of financial qualifications is provided by applicant commitment and associated license conditions proposed by the Staff); affd in part,rev'd in part and remanded, CLI-00-13, 52 NRC 23 (2000) (approving the use of license conditions reflecting applicant commitments as an element of applicant's showing of financial assurance).

Now, consistent with Wolf Creek, the NRC has the authority and the discretion to brief determine the fate of the pre-existing antitrust license conditions. As discussed in PG&E's in of May 10, 2002, in response to CLI-02-12, the DCPP antitrust conditions would continue place post-transfer, modified only as to the identity of the responsible licensees, at the request and again with the consent of PG&E.

At bottom, PG&E is seeking a license transfer to support its proposed Plan of Reorganization. Its primary interest is in facilitating the necessary regulatory approvals to transfer support that Plan. PG&E's proposal with respect to the antitrust conditions in the license However, the question is moot because in this case PG&E agreed to the condition in an attempt to obviate a pre-licensing antitrust hearing.

10

application was in furtherance of that goal, and the efficacy of the approach has been borne out by the positions to date in this proceeding taken by NCPA and TANC, the only petitioners with direct interests in the antitrust issues. However, implementation of the Plan does not depend on the NRC's agreement with PG&E's proposed approach to the antitrust license conditions. If the NRC determines that it does not have the authority, or even the discretion, under the Act to retain the conditions, the license transfer can be granted without those conditions remaining in the licenses. PG&E would continue to meet any obligations to other parties with respect to the 12 may exist under other agreements.

Stanislaus Commitments so long as those obligations 12 The prior agreements include the Settlement Agreement between PG&E and NCPA of November 1991, wherein PG&E, among other things, agreed to certain procedures for implementing the Stanislaus Commitments until January 1, 2050. PG&E, NCPA, and Palo Alto have also submitted to the Bankruptcy Court a stipulation addressing how the Stanislaus Commitments will be implemented following the reorganization called for in PG&E's Plan. The rights of these parties will be unimpaired and pass through the bankruptcy unaffected, independent of the DCPP antitrust license conditions.

11

i IV. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Commission should find that - in the unique circumstances presented here - it has discretionary authority to retain the existing antitrust PG&E's license conditions for DCPP. Therefore, it has the discretionary authority to adopt entities.

proposed approach regarding assigning those conditions to appropriate successor it should Should the Commission conclude that it lacks the requisite authority, however, without the need for any further evidentiary hearings - promptly authorize the transfer of the DCPP licenses without the antitrust license conditions.

Respectfully submitted,

• -- David A. Repka, Esq.

WINSTON & STRAWN 1400 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-3502 (202) 371-5700 William V. Manheim, Esq.

Richard F. Locke, Esq.

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 77 Beale Street, B30A San Francisco, CA 94105 ATTORNEYS FOR PACIFIC GAS &

ELECTRIC COMPANY Dated in Washington, District of Columbia This 22nd day of August 2002 12

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of: ))

) Docket Nos. 50-275-LT Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ) 50-323-LT

)

(Diablo Canyon Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of "BRIEF OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLI-02-18" in the above captioned proceeding have been served as shown below by electronic mail, this 22nd day of August 2002. Additional service by deposit in the United States mail, first class, has also been made this same day as shown below.

Richard A. Meserve, Chairman Edward McGaffigan, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Jeffrey S. Merrifield, Commissioner Nils J. Diaz, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Greta J. Dicus, Commissioner Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Lawrence J. Chandler, Esq.

Office of the Secretary Office of the General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff e-mail: ogclt@nrc.gov (original + two copies) ljc@nrc.gov e-mail: HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov 1

Laurence G. Chaset David Effross Pubic Utilities Commission of Public Utilities Commission of the State of California the State of California 505 Van Ness Avenue, 4th Floor 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5131 San Francisco, CA 94102 San Francisco, CA 94102 e-mail: dre@cpuc.ca.gov e-mail: lau@cpuc.ca.gov Robert C. McDiarmid Gregory Heiden Ben Finkelstein Public Utilities Commission of Lisa G. Dowden the State of California Meg Meiser 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5024 Tracy E. Connor San Francisco, CA 94102 Spiegel & McDiarmid e-mail: gxh@cpuc.ca.gov 1350 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-4798 e-mail: robert.mcdiarmid@spiegelmcd.com ben.finkelstein@spiegelmcd.com lisa.dowden@spiegelmcd.com meg.meiser@spiegelmcd.com tracy.connor@spiegelmcd.com Edwin F. Feo George A. Fraser, General Manager Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP Northern California Power Agency 601 South Figueroa Street, 30th Floor 180 Cirby Way Los Angeles, CA 90017 Roseville, CA 95678 e-mail: efeo@milbank.com e-mail: george@ncpa.com James H. Pope, Chairman Steven M. Kramer Maury A. Kruth, Executive Director Carla J. Urquhart Transmission Agency of Northern California Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP P.O. Box 15129 1825 1 Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Sacramento, CA 95851-0129 Washington, DC 20006 e-mail: skramer@milbank.com curquhart@milbank.com 2

I William C. Walbridge, General Manager Wallace L. Duncan, Esq.

M-S-R Public Power Agency James D. Pembroke, Esq. P.O. Box 4060 Michael R. Postar, Esq. Modesto, CA 95352 Lisa S. Gast, Esq.

Sean M. Neal, Esq.

Peter J. Scanlon, Esq.

Derek A. Dyson, Esq.

Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer & Pembroke, P.C.

1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036-3203 e-mail: ndr@dwgp.com James H. Pope James C. Feider Director of Electric Utility Director, Electric Department City of Santa Clara City of Redding 1500 Warburton Avenue 777 Cypress Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95050 Redding, CA 96049-6071 Roger VanHoy Grant Kolling Assistant General Manager, Electric Resources Senior Assistant City Attorney Modesto Irrigation District City of Palo Alto P.O. Box 4060 P.O. Box 10250 Modesto, CA 95352 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Roland D. Pfeifer, Esq.

Rick Coleman, General Manager Assistant City Attorney Trinity Public Utility District City of Santa Clara P.O. Box 1216 1500 Warburton Avenue Weaverville, CA 96093-1216 Santa Clara, CA 95050 Girish Balachandran Harrison Call Assistant Director of Utilities Call Company City of Palo Alto 130 S. Cloverdale Blvd. P.O. Box 10250 P.O. Box 219 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Cloverdale, CA 95425 3

Scott Steffen, Esq. Robert K. Temple, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel 2524 N. Maplewood Avenue Chicago, IL 60647 Modesto Irrigation District P.O. Box 4060 nuclaw@mindspring.com Modesto, CA 95352 Sheldon L. Trubatch, Esq.

James B. Lindholm, Jr.

County Counsel for the County of Law Offices of Sheldon L. Trubatch 4222 River Road, NW, #1 San Luis Obispo Washington, DC 20016 County Government Center, Rm 386 e-mail:

San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 jlindholm@co.slo.ca.us lawofficesofsheldontrubatch@starpower.net Brooke D. Poole, Esq.

Counsel for Pacific Gas

& Electric Company 4

270831.1

EXHIBIT 1

1. 47 I UNITIO SlATES NUCLEAR-R EULATORY CJ.*M.geION S*

' -. WASHINGTON.. O.'C. 20118

_4 OEO 0-:67 Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 Mr. John C. Morri ssey Vice President.&.General Counsel Paci.fic- Gas. & .Elect ric Copany 77 Seal e. Street San Franctsco, California 94106 ear Mr.- Morrissey.:

SUBJECT:

N4ENDMENT NOS. I -AND 4 TO CPPR-39 NiD CPPR-69 (Diablo-Canyon Nuclear Power Plant)

In your letter to the-U. S .Department of Justice (DOJ) dated April 30, 1976, you stated that- in the event a constructionpermit for-the Stanis, mus Nuclear Project was not.issued by the NRC prior. to July 1, 1979, PG&E :as

-4w-11ing to. have its 1icense(s), for tIhe Diablo Canyon Nuclear Pow.er PlanrtS, Units,.ý 1 :and :2, amended to Incorporate certain aultitrust. commitments. This willingness Was .;contingentq Ueo th- DOJ N"C that-no* alit it-,"m

vts.g-the--

=eaqng. was ,necsstari in conect.i on ..with licensing the Stanislaus Proji::.

The l-DW -provided. .suh advi-cei-nA.a letter -dated May 5,1 1976.

Since no construction permit for the S-tanislaus Project had yet been Is:.'

the NRC. staff advised PG&E, in a 1 etter dated September .15, 1978, -of i :s intention to include-the antitrust rconuitments as conditions. in the I;-i CanyonConstruction:Pemits. PGaE responded, itn a letter dated Sepr.:r.7 L-,.

1973,. sta.ing that it'had no objection ýto uch an amendment.

Accordingly, the Nuclear Regulatory. Co,"umission has issued Amendment ;cs.

1land 4, respectively,*to the.ProvI..-onal Construction Permit Nos.CPP.3; and CPPR,69? to provide for the addition-.of certain antitrust conditens to :the Construct~ion: Permits. We-have determined that the.a:rmondments are .adminiistrati-ve actions.which do not alteraenvironmental- impacts descri-bed.d in thet'-Final Envlronmental Statement or create new i,,pacts not previously addressed in thie`statement. -Therefore, no environzental impact appraisal or negative decl.aration7 need be prepared.

.7 MI,14CO -7

• 1

.2- 6 .;;

o;~

mr- John C. MorrisseY and Amendmenft .':o.4 to CPR er.:

Amendment No. 1 i to CPPR-39 py of. a related notice which has bee.".

Copies of AmsodencNosed FEDRA.%.~ L REGISTER c p enclosed. to At the o encl Office of osed I the DEo. RE:,--R for publiC atio.

forwarded sincerely, S Roger S. Boydi D.irector VMnatemenei.

Dtvision of ProjectReactor Office of Nuclear .Pegulat-.

Enclosures:

to

1. .Amendment Nos. 1 and 4 CPPR-39 end CPPR-69

2. FEDERAL REGISTER Nlotice.Amend-ments

3. EvaluatiOn Supporting

• ccs w/enclosures: See next page

DEC 0- O~il7

. o c. irri-ssey 1r. Richard Hubbard iMB Technical Associates cc: Ricjr1 ;. Sal:;an, Esq.,Chalruan 366 California Avenue Ato:r.k z.ety. & Licensinq Appeal: Palo Alto, California 9 3.1 oc U S. -,id:ear Regulatory Cor!vnission Dr. William E. Martin,

• Wa:L.i*;tOrD,0.. C. 20555 Senior Ecologist

. Crane,. J.r., Esq.

BatteI e Memorial Institte SPhiao PacifC Gals &'Electric Company Columbus, Ohio 43201 7

77 Stree 94106. Mr. James 0. Schuyler,, *u -l iar.

San r,-.cisco, California ProjectS. Engineer 1ti esCom~issi on. Pacif.fc* Gas" & Electric Co.

Jan-iceCa!iE. Kerr, Ic'.Util

~ri**-?ul Esq.

7-7 Beale Street Street San. Franci sco, Cal1 forni e 350 1.1

,Iister Sar, r'.,"'soCaiiforntla--.194102 Mr.. W, C. Gangloff Westinghouse Electric Ccr"-r-,k

%Mr. Frjerick EisSler,. President P. 0.-Box 355 Scenic Stioreline.?reservation 1522G Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Cooiference, Inc.

4623:4:e ".esa Orive Brent Rushforth, Esq.

Santa Barbara,.Cal-ifornia. 93105 Center for Law in the Public Interest Ms.. El zabeth E. Apfelberg. 10203- .Santa Monica Boule"ard 141,5; C-azadero 93401 Los Angetes, California 9YS;V7 San Luis Obispo, California Ms. Sandr-a A. Silver Snel'1 .&C..WiW Arthur Gehr, Esq.

11er 1792 Cunejo 'Avenuer 93401 3100 -Val l ey Cneter.

San Lui..3Oolispo, California Phoenix, Arizona 8507-3 VMr.. .Gcrdcn A.-:.S.i I ver Bruce Norton, Esq.

93401 1792 Conejo ..Avenue 3216 Uorth 3rd Street San .Luis Obhipo, California Suite 202 Phoenix, Arizona. 85012 PaulI' C. Valentine, Esq.

321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, Calif ornia 94302 M lmer, wi .ichapl R...Klein, Esq.

Cutl er & ,Pickeri..g.

1666 K Street, N'. We .

Yal-e I. . Jjones, Esq.. Washington, D. C. 20005 9.h I Ness Avenue*

100 1 Van

.i~r 941.07 avid F. iFleischakero Esc.

San FrpeisCO, c California 1025 15th Street, N. W.

Sth Floor Ms. Re.ye Fleming 1746. Chorro Street 93401 Washington, 0. C. 20006 San Luis Obispo, California

mr. John-C. Morrissey Dr. w. Reed JchnSOnl cc: California DepIt.of Health: Atomic Saf ety & Licensing.

Appeal.Board, ATV4: :.Chief, Environfl-IT~taJl u. S*.Nuclear Regulatory.

IRadiati~nflCbftroI U-1it Commnission RadiolOgiC 11CAlth 'Sect~iCfl 714."P Street - Room 498 Wash .nston, D. C. 20555 Sacr~ift, aiorlan Al~an S. Rosenthalp Esq.

Ch'di rman,, San..-Lui~s 0biSpC)

Couunty Atomic Safety & Licwensi n Board-of zSupervi~sorS 'Appeal Board County' Cou~rthouse Ane - R6om20 U. s. nuc lear.Regulatory San LuIS .Obj sPo. .Californlia 93401 .Comn1Sissflb Washingtton. D.' C. .20555

!u., -$. Envi~ronmental Prot...~fognc Arti: -. EIS,-_Coordi~nator Region1ix Office 1,0 Californiai.'Street.

San FranCi-Sco, Calift niz 41 Mr. John Marrs MF~anaging Editor San Luis ObispooCounty Vrelegram- Tribune...

13291 johnsbn :Avenue..

'P.0.,.Box 1-12"930 940 Sani Luis Obispo, Californ~ia

• El~izabeth s-;.Bowers,: Chairman Atomic Safety Stlicensir2,-3 Sard Washingt~n, 0.C 05 14r. ,Glenn'0. Bri ght AtOmic-Safety & Licensir.n Board 0-1 U. S.' NUclear Regulat~ory CIzjUss Washington:,.(0. C-. 20555 Tolb6e rt Young

~.0 BQX219 Avila Beach, Clfri 32

K~ ~ IJ'LER i REGIULATOR COISSI

,~I ZGý: WASHINGTON. 0. C.20"6S A7pfCiFC; GASAi .CTICC.Y UNIT 1 2r~APLO t 1-1011or NUCLEAR POWER PLA.IT DOCKET Nw 50-27

CD!t~TTOpROVSO COISTRUCTION PERMIT Amendment No.

ConstruCtiOn. Permit NO - CUP A. Te guatryCotrn.i -2.'r ssionl (RC) having found that:

to ConstrucationPermit No. the I*7~'r;J'ft CPPR.-39, -for the .pur-Pcse of~2dn nteCntuct. Permit antitrust -o.--nit ~e nt sU,. -: :pP E ', 1~

lettr of April 310, P276 t-o the.Department of

~

• ~ ~~ rco-~1~wt h tnad -J.21and requfrements ofth dl regulations Ac of. .S54, as amended - and the CofmiISSion's pet M.'h-.~:in 10 CFR -Chapter 1; o-f t ahis' amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 5 1 2.T v taflc#

inimical to the conhi~o:,.

3.. T~h' Vatnc e'of this amiendm~ent-will notandbe s~afety of the' pub ic; ant

-deý:n a6-? Srcw-'ity or tor the tbeal'th

4. Pric.- oublic.-notice.o'f this a 'amendment is not required since the, hazarrds consideration.

einý:ndrent' does not involve significanlt

i. Csr -Iodigy -ctJic Per.inf No. CPPR-39 is hereby amended-by

• adding .1 tewa par~gr.aph 2.D, which reads. as follows:

the following antitrust

Z.D. Thi s Const*ruct Ion .Permit is subject to co-,.d t1-ons:

004Deini'.ions Compay n

(~i(a~~ApI '.at"mea~sPacific Gas and Electric of'this license..

'successnrpr corporat ion, or any assignee

(!)(b) "Service Area" means tha the ar wi n'the exterior geogra16hi.c bou~ndaries .of: several areas -el"4tricaleiy served ýat. retai 1 now or.in thet fluture, by_ Alcant ,

Cali-fornia aid, those areas in Northern and Central' adj acen.t thereto.

01)(0. "4lhringDubl-ic Entity" means a incalyrescsbi private or enti-ty or la-wfuLI association there-9 or aperating, cr inK oowfli r. , con~tractually con~trolling~ contrattually-dor~

good faith proposin'g to own , to or tran's or 16to -3perati facilit~fes for the Seneratt1'i, power issi-nt -t60 ki ovol ts or- above, of electr-ric.

41-h~~

-2Z--

fo1no.i, crltera. (1) i t .s which mertorop's each oF ':he exicshimeets facilities are or will be. techni-.

iith those cally feasible of direct interconnection 0of its existin. oPrpr op r o part of .Applli.cant. 9) all or the Service Are.;

facilities,  ?.re or wilIbe. 1ocated.withln (3itS p.-';;ry .pu,-rse for own;.ng, contractually, con facilles Is to sel

.trolling, ur,oper.tin'generatlon generated; and (4) it i-,

in the Service.Arza the power a publ:ic.

or upon c vc 4,nce 01.nt oFoperations will be, state law or the S utility rc.,lated under applicable. from, regulat.i on by Federal. Pc*-mr Act, or exempted state, munlcic.

virtue ofthe fact tha.t it is a federal, or other p)ublic enti.ty.

Distributi-o-nSyst.em" means a financi.aly 01)(d) "i ghbOItg entltyuricJhi.f engageCs, or:f responsibleý privaite cr public in the distrlbutlon in good faith prop.:ses to-engage, and.which meets each of the electric pow-er at retail (2), and (4) in subparagraph criteria nuubered (1),

(c) above.

administrative,

.(I)(e) "Costs." means all capital.expenditures, and maintenance expenses, taxes, general, operatlion and costs of capital Including a fair and depreciation investment, w.,hich are reasonable return on Applicant's particlJar service or proper y allocable to the the regulatory authority transaction as determined-by over the particular service or havingv.j.risdiction transaction.

means those .practices, methods.

(1)(f) "Good.Utility Practice" d "iglevels of reserves and pro:l"5ts and equipent, P ... frcm time to*time, t1.t:.

for continflr.Cies., as rodified Service Area toeoperate, re-; -.

are. cotanonlv used -in the a utlll-'

and safely,-alect~ c pow-2r facilities to serve due * ;

and economically, with own customers-4dependatly natural resources aand the prol.ec For the cotiserv-atlon of Service Area, provided such of the..environment of the are .not unreasonably

.pfractitWIs ,- methods and equipment restrictive.

%.Thich is intended to be (l)(g) "Firm Power" heans that power at all .ties and for which, available to the :custcm.er av~ilab!1it-, ade':.;

In order to achieve that degree of and sufficieCttranSt installed, and spinning reserves to the load, center are to move such power and reserves provided.

(2) Interc~onnection.

Interconnection.agrteements. nfl hte '  :

lC.

li1cense conditons shabeijC.tOU

• prg'rap (ýat)through ()

C!Yrefuseter.L.

.(2-)(t). Appl icant shall iuseunIeacal 1-no~v

• nd- prite omall in para-l1.61 ith arvy Uhhor ing Liv Ent ity-, o-r to. inrterccnnect vi t anOy 1.10sho ,1 be-v -.e bitt-on S$ystem. .. Such -inittrtoflnOctiofls (2.)(b) Inter~c.60pect-ion.h -si b :0o0ift, uhil~ess Other, Jar~eedb th  :,f int~erctevtin 16n agr~..e::

ta~n.

• te __ao 44netl'f -not:beTIicifd t o1c'r -vc.

sta~.

whnhihr lot eare preferb61 fro fthe Aofý~nGoo UtAtyrct in and y t c ore ~k .froav ~.2e Ap~licantmay. inci-de anyneCfhOCir gf.

provisions. that: a Ieighborifl En-tity or, ~e N rhb orl r Distr'ibution :Sys t'e*m.malfhtialinth e power factor SSZ:-e.

vit load ,at_ a c,llpavabl-elo 1t ieveltoth' mai~ntaVi bpplicant A.n the same- geogrPh iC area' and use c--,: r~e coh:trdl- methods Lto- achiiiv -this-objecti*'e (2(c Iterconnectio aement hall ýnot pro.vId'e for ro~

extensi1ve. f acfl.Jt'es or- control eqipriet- at the p'.-I of .inte~r connection, thap are requir~ed agrie by Gcoid U%.i -4i>.

Patice unless the- parties mu'tually thatF- :i.

cirC~gnstariceS- wiarrant 'special. facilities or equ iP:7.z!:

(2.)(,d) TJhe Costsý.Qf aIto alac . ilitie eurdt r.~

a seric ~e~pontofi~t;ecnetOf 11,lbe ?I: '.

on- the bUsis'of.th' rb~ected :~C-a'fterz ncma-ii bvene'.i ts f-3 party ro~m, thfnteron~etikfor. cons, Llerv.ti. *..-n vari o.S transact~ions %or- wh`Ich 'the intdrco~nnectior, b,

faciltes are ýt~o be ýused, un. ess: Otherviis e t r.4-6 the parties.

Ansshal (2)(e) ~~griren I noti'pseit.;r upon th,ts apacity. a. d vnercv stolde *r treceo ree-1/2

,exchaniged upnder ý`the, -agreemen&'except..as.miay be.

by,Go~dd-11t 1ity Pract ice-

-4 (2()Anlnter TlflCti n aavrecO Ofl t l" not prohibit any.

enteri~ng. in#o oh,,,, !i.irconnfect ion agrcevro!":

pary - Io recPeive i e but -mayof: 'provide t'hat k2 Appl ~ct:-:

inter~l:CllO1-r.i: ~fl

-notice any addi~tiOr~l 3

4 Tider and agree. uce.-n others, (Zthe .Par-tis jointic S frea~sures-, or equip.~f.. ,

rv Z

otatw

~~~~~%o adiioa "whch. nay, be reuiG yGood ci.i tY Prac'ic as ~~:s

-of,- thie -new,arrap:ýe'tft~ Znd'(Z)A;~c pic t na.y tter-mna..

thnecnnection agriaanent the rel bity of ItS

.syStef 1 or ser vice, to, its desl. tut:.+/-Sw4lb

- affectedý by sch dTOnal.

i htecoonfeCti on.,

(2),(-g Aplcant* May i nclude .ProVi1silOlS i-nEnanitor g1bot re~iue rr(quirin a% ~'e~bOif IV car. odii

~ ~~to deeo'wthiP.

-Distrlbutl~ Sy~lte di r:a nd -t: e nitte-d progra9mýflcT6 &-h at hl s4eparati'on... OileSich rogJrentS.ti or. cuta-i I r.ent: df equitably share 'the int'erru-ptibn customer -1o d (3) Reserve Corordination.

- n erco nn, .ctioftAgre!I ft nej i It.ed oursua n6 to -th~es liene onit -1tsh.Jl be0subjct to the following.

paa -ahs (a)throughi () .re,,rdi ng" reserve coordinati^f it trt .r~-'

((a Appl icant and any f'ehborlflg 1nit.ity with -which-connects -shall Jonly e~ttbll-ih. aniselpa-4,ttely ma intt.:7 res-erves ti~n~ toa be in~st~e or ot-w1epo~

'the Unes tkieitwse-.

uner-n nercnein agre'etv ereseS.'

mut~uall*y- greed tporeere shall bean -temiý't Plercenta9 o4 es: fl ae ia ~i fir

.2 t pjkaV

~.~~rv~pe'cetaeshl be At icast. eqtw rcoflflfttI*

plann reds~erve.,perete2g w tiU. the. in te h a1- not :.'e. requi re 6opov, e.

'.A* NOghbori lEt-ty f~ its -ioad..whi~c~h-it rent woeets.

reserves f. r. tWVý t portio While dif-fe P re's.'r thouhuchse f-irnPowe.

, no -party to an ina, terc nnection: ag~roteehff.

agementsrquird, to. provide greatv-e reservprel~~.

shallbe givetn inPteronetio aranete, innder cre`ýasged b rý mybe -. reuier ta ntl orrv roidtprs' additona

~-

r-Int etful monet of sut Inrareicraedb

ighbrori ng En tit ii it intr (3) (b) Appi i~cart and 'Neo connects. sha 11 j intIy. e~sltab Ii?4 S '

4 evr" :r the mtnimt.-I.spiffiflc reserves G interconnectiofl agree-:!,_-nt. n n1~ ;Ohew agreed upoi,. spinntnb resevs~A bea 1 ~~ e Cs

-a

• ~~ a petrcentnc~e of pe'ak .lcad. and L-*1.;! ~of:n!:

!~

s pi

• percent-age shell be a, lastthae: c:i I CC, oil

's A j:Z reev enftagp w hot,~~

Enti1ty ;s s-,i1:l. not- be required to-,'rnvide Srnrri~l re3r for;ta prtlion of its "load* tvhiAc-: I. mneets- thaounIh

'purchases. of -Fir~n?notWr. cdIT" ren't s;::,ninflfg e h-i IJ I .per~eintaýeis may be specified i~ ,arioiisiflteruafrirec ;reez'int agreeme~nts,. no party,-to,,an -intcr-c':I-nnectiofl prigreserve, hllbe. requ~ired -to:"roflde-a ~rae perce *nt'age the-n tha -wIT . Appli-4..Pi" ent~s nrovieids., excepf pol' p- ;.

Vfthe tiotal spinning' reserVes malntafnsse eibjt eq'~ito that nx i sth~ng. Wiit ha.

a.:gi~ven interconnect, rag tae c.~~- jo y

• tfhn the othcr pArty or rea son. -of. the. new-a rralJr~geent prartles -may be rcequiroL;iunt to. provhie, anditio,;3i spinnin;,

reserves in tmoul - f su'ch incrc,,:3.

(3)c)pplcan shlloferto tell, on~ reaslonah't teizvis ar- J.

co~~ti~l5, iclu.i0g specified Pericd, raciyt

..#i-ghbori~ng .Entitry for. use.:as r(.1ete'S -if' Suchm-cePacci~

nel'ther :'needed for Applic-ant' s otwn systc! nrtier~t3t. Er,

• cofmuitted to otherts iand -it' thc .ihori -i wi.1 offer .to-sel~l,. on reLsoablono $.e tcrrd and.col-1.ons5,-.&S

ýown such capacity to. Applic'ant:.

Applicat' ýmay j1ncl Ude in a~n~y ierccnnfect co -cvrper's. acree,.w:;t (3)-(d) E-ntit

.Provisionsz requilrilgM` a - e ghborii App icant .for any res ves;ApiatvkS~db

-the result of ta fJalueo sc mai nta in -all or: an4kp-?..rt of ýtie r~e Si~t*has a 01 r to provide in* said intdrc-nnec'tici -agreeimonf (1)(e), Applicant shl 1ffr to -coordina-.-e mraii'terancý'-_~*~

• with - eiighborig Enlte intercc~nnectd ity i' A anid to eychunge 'cr sc 11 main6te nane. c apac a~- ensi-t!ý when such capac ity.,an~d 'nerg aravib and -i t .

• • raoaetodso in..accordarice w-th G a d Uilit

• Practice.

(4) Emergency Power Applicant shall sell emergency Powr to any ntercor.:.

levelof mini' Neighboring Entity which maintains the reserve _.agreed upon with Appl icant, agrees to usedu, emergency, and agrees tO se.

di:fl-gence-to correct the emergency power to- Applicant.. Applicantandshall engaP if and when capacifty energy for such-transactions such transactions are a-vatl.able frorn other-sources, .t

.only.:.to the. eXtent: that it can do so without .ihpa-ris':.

cus,'.

serviceto Applicanits retail or wholesal.e power coftllire.-t.-er!.

or impairing Its abilitv to discharge prior (5) Other Power Exchanges on ifi.le, or ..hereafter file, w '

• Should Applicant.-have .agreem, ent;5 or rate schedule:-.

Federal Power Coailssion, providing for the: saleand purchase of short-term':-'c-, e'.

capacity and energy,. Iong-capacity and enery, and limited-term economy oenerg.yr energy., Applicant shel

• like or.st,:;:.*.

on a fair and equitable basis,. enter- into agreements with.anyNeghborHng Entity, when such for:x. the" of capacity and energy -are avalliable,recognlzing past experienCe, dtffereft economic conditions and Soc:*

-Utility. Practice may justify different- rates, terms a-:

conditions.. Applicant :shallrspnd. pron:ptly.tto nq.i.*

o -Nei -ghbor-ing Entities"cofc rerfllflg the availab-ilitty 0"'

0f such forms of capactty and.-.energy from it's system.i (6) Whol.esale Power Sales ful Upon request, Applicant shall offer tosell finr, partial requirements power for .a specifted period t' c interconnected ieighbori.fg Entity or Neighboring is".

terms

.buti.on.System under a contract.with reasonaflle APP.jic,. Cpermit condit ions. t'cluding provisions which recover. jts Costs,. .Such whleiale. power sales .nus't -.

cons:istent with-, od Utility Practice. Applicant. s,.

not be requi -red, to. sell. Firm Power at wholesale if i~t or transmissi not. have available sufficient .generation would..:.

to supply .:the, requested .service- or if the sale service to its retailustomers or its ability~to dis.

prior commitments.

.I

-7 (7) Transmisslion Services to i, "

(7)(a) Applicant shall transmit power pursuaiint agreements, with provIsions -hich are apprO-,

are censisti-r t requested-transaction and Iwhich listed helow, s. rv- "

as license conditions. Exccpt or a;;liong .:r--_;

shall be provided.(I) between two of - Neighc.'.

Neighboring Entities or sections sep raLed, c:t!'.

system which are geographically now or in the future,"Appl icant is which, ... . (..)c ....

now or- .'

between a Neighboring Entitywith one or nwore .::-a,*7 future, it is interconnected and now or in tI. -I-*..ri Distribution Systems withbetweenwhich, r'itv and -(3) any t:eightworim:;

it is connected A:"t "

SNeighboring Distribution System(s) and theother -*i.tri" I with any point of direct interconnect.ion '

outstde tl.. i-"

system engaging -in bulk power supply t.:::: ;:,;:;, :"

electrically served at retail by'Applicant, to trarinit*f p ,.;

not be required by this Section of hicl- z a hydroelectric facility the: ownersi'p f:--4; Applicant or (2) i.nvoluntarily transferred from any- electric systui I c t 11 for sale to Neighboring.Entity of t sl v si.;'e-"

outside. the exterior geographic..boundaries at retail by Apliie.¶.n, i "

areas then.electrically served.

Distri-tut.C:c v. 1.

other Neighboring Entity, Neighboring such pbwer- at i^ ,--'.:

or .Applicant wishes to purchase, Any Neighberint E'ti*.y pricelfor use within said areas.

Neighboring Distribution System(s) requesting nctice to .

service shall give reasonable advance Applicant shall no*t ý'e of its schedule and requirements..

requiredby this Section to would provide trans-is kr t arv;CCe be inconsistent "'.:t""

If the proposed transaction

Good Utlity Pract-ice or ifat the necessdry tran.,y:im . A..

committed the time of the.req.-:.t facilities are for whi:ch service is r=Z-"'.I. ..

fully-loaded during the period '1*-7!--~

by Appli.carst or have been previously reserved uses consitternt w!'G

• purposes, Iloop' fl ow, .or otherthat with respect t6 t!he Utility Practice; providcd, Applicant shall not Ue . a-.

Northwest-Southwest. Intertle, requested tran sisstcn s:"

by this Section to provide the own use of this faci.,.&-.

if It would impair Applicant's with the Bonneville Project Act, 'ark~t'n (50 - 7.

August .20, 1937.), Pacific Northwest Foi;er consistent (78 Stat. 756, August 31, (78 1964) and the Publicc ; l]`-. .

Act, 1965 Stat. 6L*2, August.?O.

Appropriations

(7)(b)- Applicant .-,1 0l incIud e i n its' p apnin~g -and c~nstcucti~nl progra%.- ~u,:h incre ses. in -its transmi~ssion capacity or dditfl al tranr.Misioh~f facilitieS, as may'(a) .be reqUIre such -a in..paragraph of -this for, the tirr-sacatlofs referýred,-to

.Section, '.-rnvidedanhy. v',ighborifl rntl-ty-or.Nei-ghboeri.g ufcetadvance is'%tr ibvt (" Sy st e~i ~ie.plC8l lot ice. ý- be -necessary to ac~con~ododte its requireiienits from -a -rag-.J tory.and technical standpObft and provided furthe -tiihe .e~nti~t reusti-ng transmission servicCkS coipe~nsaes Applicant for. the Cos~ts. capac~ity incurred'as a resuil.tw..

will be o0.f the re'quesi." 'Whe're transmissiOn. will'be.

Increased: oir adiditi~onal trAnsmi-ssion! fail-ities service tb In~statGo pr de or..1aifitrain-threqueStid Sys'te.,

a Iieighboring Entity or. Neighb'oriigflgDis~ttlbUt'iOfl 8 ate. for-ts~e of.

APIli-calle "'. require, in addi.tion:.t-o' Vanetf Costs 41ssociated -witti1the.

other' fcirzi ie ty that be -made

'icrsd aaI oaddi.ti-onal facflitfesý shg.of -theifr byte pti i~nacodance. fit ah:nd -inadvarice respect. -'use of the new~capbcity or f.liltieS.

(T) (c) Nothiog ioer i.fshallI require: Appl icant (1 to construct addl tionalI tra nsri~ss icen facilities if the construction of..

PractIce such facilities is inconsi~steflt w~ith. Go~dd!tility without duplicating or ifi suc-h faciliti-es-could be, constructed (2) to provide.

ayportion of -Applicant'sýtrasisflYt, or. (3) -to consZCUtuct aretall1 customer t-'rarsnip.is Zi.6if se.rv.i~ce. to.-"'area at

• ~etnsfSinotsete then electric-ally* served retail ' by.Applicanit.

services Q(7d) pa-te -s;!e-,u1es and aegreements- for transmissioQn by Applcn i~

provided u.Od~er. thiis Sect 1onýshalIl'-,be filIed*over-such rates theýreg~l atery, a.gency having juirisdiction and,.agreewtnts. I-() Access. to Nvc :Or ;eneration Ifa'raj qtibor Ii-ig En.ti-ty or-1Nei~ghboring Distribto (8)(a) A001licant .f or'-an owner System. raa.Lkes a.timely, request *to

.ship participatio-n. Vinte. Stanislaus -Nuclear -Project-,

Uni t, Mo .- Ic r.an6y f uture. nuclear- gererati~ng unit. for wftci' Appliaf IpplI*Os. fol-r a construction -perts duIng: the 2Uyer ero immediately following 'the -date .of"the',

ýcons .truction pe4rmnit for* StAnisla!#uSUnit rno. 1,l. ApplIcant' shall ffrheeqeting -party 'an oppor~tunity, to partl ci.pate i1 suc~h units, up to an am~ount reasonable in lgI

7 9

f th ar-ti C'i pant.s. Wi 4,11 of the r el at i vel oods o e. P.

r Sta Islitis-.Unit. No.. I or. any future nuc be-4ermt;!.'

unit, -a. requeist. -for. part iti.Vat ion if recei ved w.ithý-tn-'90 'd f t 'r the ma i I i rig by.

to Neiýhbortng Ehtities and -11.*Jghbbri 6g, Di str-:)*U':-6 on -F, of an announ;&.4nt. of it-t-,:inteAt to c.ons t tuctin t !ile' jnli,.

and a-request f-or a n, e xpre 4si o,n of inl-Lw-est.

Parti.ci'at shall be on..-aý*ýbastis,-r.hich:toroper!,,t.1-es for. a reasonW6 shir*O Of a 1.1 :i ts, ý'osts, Ii nf!-.

AppTicant and to. be incurred, in pIan'ni'ng, At fw.

on -ad' OpArattng tbi-ý f act] i ty*

'A 8)(b) An) .-Nd'i _gfibbý i ng Ent'.,-ity -or ý.any N i§hborin§.Distrfl_%-..M0r. il 1.

SY ttem. ma y reques fior, Pi.eti.-Idt-Pati-On. 1;e.

nuc ka -u 6.

1.4 -0 tj n e r, able--agre eriV.- t o.,-a-:sslpe f;. -honc al or S-hA r P,o f if-.iiik Uttd -z*tth pa rf un.i.t Iftdtssac a. IiA.-tiosmi tstwi raCA11104k, Ui 11 e,S3 7 Ent I Zy:. 0.

otherwi so' .-gre ed bYA Y Wica-ht i.Heig hbdrtng

- -p Ne i ghbor-i-ng. Di trib ution System, desirin or _c.patr i G.:

u s.t haveý*sigýdid su&-ah a* emet nt wi th-- i n, one p.ma a*%

Applicant.1fi- 0 fhat,- Hie.iv.hbori-ng. 'Ent 1ty or Nei ghbori n9---.wst-r1bu;U on, ýSys t em..pert ilitn't fW.-iciu-1 anJ technical. dita.-beariiig-6n.,thO:,*fe4sýtbýi-lft-y of thi,. proj.ecz.

ni a4atl ppli Sdd-i.,,tioh6 to -A _cAn t. -ApplAcan't s4a which 4're.'the -abl-*

-1 provide add fn-q'the'ýyi _eiftfient.d4tl reqL 14SV A ft,9 Pa.rtythey-,,ý'becc-,;;-ava as-. thil-I Pef, 0

ýdur, ear Th 1 expein'ses in.currad b Appl-ican 't-forthWithAhe Applica.tý i-n., ma ki n s6ch ff6ancial 'an'&-technical d; at 4 ava"Abli; in any- part imay- I on agrtlement subject-iOtri t i ýitrequire.:ProvJsiorS.-r h1i %sr

'Sect i omi.`_ýAp-p-ill eq. Ir'1,;

pawpent -by' each 0articipant--of, fts.-share.of all costs

ý-'&P'_ to-,the---d' :-oVthe_ý-a9r*ee.men't.j reqtd t.i00,ng pa nt thereift' t ay ata shar,ýý

ýpartici er o p- jtsý prur 0.,'..they--.are.4xpe-r4ed rejulriný, L-ach of. units-iM-relatid fac-ilili vs s 'arfid' i part.i;cip4ntto.i4 e.iuchfi.-naincial arrano'ements at; n:to ay necetsary -to:'ens,-ure.-the, ab II i t Of tho'. ýOart.ic I1):Int conti"'KC-e td oiiko-_ý ýuch 0 C.S.

(9Y Impleiientatibn

9) hargos, tems-,And;-p*raCt*itlp*.s a*re: and tha 1:1

( (a) Alll'raiisý,

be subjOct-to theý..acceptance. and approvaVof njv- T;4gt,11 tory 'agencies -or courts haming Jurisdiction 6v4ýr the"i.

I

• • • .' . .*x " * * - a . ..... :

- 10o rights ofa (9)(b) Nothing contained herein shall enlarge any System Neighboring Entity or Neighboring oistributionof Applicant to provide services to retail customers or federal law.

beyond the rights they have under state shall be construed (9)(c) Mothing in these license conditions to contest the.

as a waiver by:Applicant of its rightsto. a particular application of any commitment herein factual situation.

These license conditions do not. preclude Applicant frcmi (9)(d) such changes applying to any.appropriate forum to.seek time be appropriate. In in these conditions as may at the. law and -ood Utility accqrdance.with:the then-ex5ts.ing

-Practice.:

(9)(e) These-.icense .condit-ions do not require Applicant tot become a common carrier.

as of the da.e *."Issuance.

.C. This amendment is effective

FQ.R.THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO.MISSION

.Divislon..of Project Xanagemen+-l-Off Ice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Date of Issuance: DEC 0- 6

-W

_w-i;"..,.-...

"NUCLEAR REGULATORY 06MISSION WDAMINGTOt4. 0. C. UM55

,¢ PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC' CO,?.*ANY (DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2).

DOCKET-NO. 50-323 AMENOMENT TO PROVISI O1NAL CONSTRUCT ION PERMIT Amendment No. 4 Construction Permit ro. CPPR-G.

A. The Nuclea Regjujatory Commission: (NRC) having found that:

'f.1 thG purpWe I The. 4mendment tb.Co'nstruction Permit No.. CPPR.690 coilttmerts of -ocl 1iaq.v.. tihe C.nstructi onPermit the antitrust Depart~ment. o1f "stattd !n P.G&E's .letterlof Apr 1 30, 1976-to the "

Jt. ..... l1ies with the stahdards and requir.elYents of.-thkAa.t1c regulio Energy. Actof- 1954.-'as ýamended, and the Commissjon'S set forth in 10CFRChaptet" 10 CFR Part 5,;

2. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with to. the cori~cn

3. The issuance of thi s amehdment. will not be inimical, the pubic; and defense and securlty:.or to the health eand.safety-.of

4. POr'ior :public- notice -of thits amendlment. Is noti required si ace the anendment does not involve'a signtificanAt hazards cornsideration.

B. AccorldinglY, Construction -Permit N6. CPPR-.69 Is--hereby -amended by adding ,a new paragraph 2.0. Wthich :reads as follows:

the fOll.owing antitrust 2.04 This Construction Permit i's subJect to conditions:"

.(I) . Definitions any.

".Applitcantm means Pacific Gas and Electric.Company, license.

sucesso`r corporation:, or any assignee .of this (1) (b) Servce Area" means that-area within areas t~he exterior.

geographic .boundqaries of the several electricallY

.served at: retail, noW or fn the future,-by Appli cant, and those a&reas- inNorthern and :CentralY.lCal ifornia.'

adjacent thereto.--

W I)(c) "Neighboring Entity" means a financially responsible private or public entity or lawful association therec,,

So~ni.ng, contractually controlling or operating, or irn good faith proposing to own, to contractially orcotrol tr:anii or..o operate facilities for the generation, electrrtc pc-;-.

of mission- at 60 kilovolts or above, 70=4014c Z7r1

(1) its which '*i e ts ev-_N of the follOwin§_crterla:

• are or will be techni existin)g or pr..po~fsd facilities cally feasible of direct interconneCtlong with those existing or provosed of Applicant; (2) all or pa'rt of its the Service ore; facilities *a: or. will be located-ithin con for owning, contractually (3) its prim)ary purpose is-to sell trolling., or o erating generation facilities in the. Servic.J Area the pov.r.ge1erated be, , (4) it is, and or upon co,":eflCt2UIent of operations ll a public state law or the utility regulated under-applicable regul ati on by Jfrro, Federal Power ct, or, exe:npted federal, state, munlclpa.l virtue of the fact that it isla or otsher public entity.

(1)(d) "Neighbori ng Distribution Systems means a fi nanci ally responsible. private or public entity which engages, or of in the distribution In.good faith proposes to. engage, meats .eac.h of the electric power at retail and and which criteria -numberedI(), i(), (4) in subparagraph (c) above.

administrative, (l) (e) "Costs" means al1 capital expenditures, expenseS, tayes, general, operation and maintenance including a fair and.

depreciation and costs of capital' investment, which are reasonable return on Applicant's service or properly allcI0t0e-tO the particular regulatory authority transaction as determined. bý the particular service or having jurisdiction over the transaction.

(1)(f) "Good Utility Practice"j .eans those practices, methcds and provisions:

and equipment, including levels of reserves time to time, that for contingenfcies,as modified froin to operate, re iaaly are co.-aqonly usedin the.Se rvice Area to serve a utility s and saflely, elecuric power facilities with due retard own.customers..dependably and econtoically, and the preter.t-on for the conservatIon of natural resourcesprovided such

" of the environrut.tof the Service Area, not unreasonably*

practiccs, niethcds and equipment are Srestrictive.,

which is intended to be FirmPower".rmeans that power

(l)(g) and for which, available to the custoier at all oft-lres availability, ade .u1e 4 in order to achieve that degree sufficient transmits on installed and spinning reserves and load center are to mnove such power. and reserves to -the provided.

-3 (2)

---

Interconnection ...

Interconnection -agreements negotiated pursuanit .to these license conditions shall be subject to. the followi:ng paragraphs (a) through (g):.

(2)(a) Applicant shall not unreasonably refuse to interconnec ..

and operate -normally in parallel with -any Neighborin Entity, or to interconnect with any Neighboring Di~tri button System. :Such interconniections shall be.consistent with Good Utility Practice.

• (2)(b) In.terconnection shallI be atone point unless otherwise agree- by the .partisto an Iinterconnection agree -...

Interconnection-shallIno.t be limited to Iower volt'ges.

higher when.eod: vo-l~taSes are preferabl-e from the standpoa. t Sof Ut~ lity, Practice ,and are avail~able from Applic,:,.

Appliicant: may Include in, any lnterconnection agreement provisions that .a NeighboringEnti-ty or t4ofghboring Distribution System maintain the power factor associated at a comparable withkits load in.the leve,. to that naintained' "`

cant by. AppoI methods: same geograph*c area and use co nparable

.control to achieve this objective.

(2)(c) :Interconnectio,. agireements- Shall notf .provid.e for*more extensive facilites"or control" eqofpment at the poi.nt of interconnecti on :than are required by Good. Utility Prlactice'unless.-the pirties mutually agree that-partict'aar

..circumstances warrant special factiflities or.equ-ilpcent.

(2).(d) The* Costs of..additional fac-ilities required to provide service at t-he poi6nt,.f9interconnectI1n shall be.alloc;.. eac  :

osthe ba-sis :of the projected economic benef'its.r party, from the interconneCtibno-after.consileration of t.Ie vari-ou's. transactions for whtch the interconnection-.

. faciliti-es are to be Used., unless otherwise agreed by: . -.

S . the parties.

(2)(r' An int eirconnection agreement shall not impose I.ation.

upon the use or resale of. capacity:.and energy sold rcr exchanged .under the-agreement except as may be requi-ied by Good.Utility Practice. .

. MIA 7 ..

-4 "

not prohibit any .

(2)(f) An interconnection a'ritsholl agreements, party. from erte,-ing i:,to other.. interconnection receive adequate but may-.proviide that (1) Appicant arrangement with notice of ally efditic-i.7 intercr-iinectlOn and agree upon others, additional (2) the partis joint,,ly-cosider Jctractul Iovisiors,-itcasures, or equipM..et, which may be required Good 3ti)ity. Practice asa resuit a.

of the inew arrangame"!t4 end (3) Arp- icant,8Y terminate the iýntercc iaCtiOn !!. .ent i f the rellability OF its dversely.

systemlor service to its custci:ers would be arrangement.

t affected by such additional inttrciioner.tion Applicant may include-provisionfs in"ftity an interconnection.

(2)(g) or f.eighborin agreement requi ri-ng, a Neighboring Distribution SSytemto "develop with Applica.nt a:ccordi nated progra:Iifor underfreouefcy load. shedding and tie shall separation4. Under such programs, the parties. 'of equitably share the interruptiona o- curtailment customer load.

(3) Reserve Coordination pursuant to these

'Interconnection agreeents negotiatedto the following lI cense conditions shalI be subject reserve coordi.nation:

paragraphs (a) through ('-,) regarding Applicant and.any ?4eirhborlng E.ntity with which maintain. it inter (3)(a) and.separatel.y connects..shall jointly establish otherwise tirovide.J the minimum reserves to be installed or otherwise under an interconnectirzn agre-o.'ent. Unless be -expressed as.-a mutually agreed upOn- reserves s!-all the ininimtM..

and percentage-of estimated firm peak load to Applicant'S reserve percentage shalI be at least equal reserve percentae.wi t*)out the interconnection.

A anned pl R~ei glboring Intity s!%.I not be required to provide reserves for thlat portion of its load which it.liDee.s through purchases Of'"Firi Power. -hiIe different resprve interconnection percentages -,inY be specified in varloijs agreement agreements, no" Prty .-to an interconnection percentage reserve shall- be. required to.' provide a :greater except that than s planred- -reserve perce-ntage, NApplicant' iust .p-ovide .to inaintai'n.

if the total' .reserves Applicant 1 system reliability equal to that .exist ;ng withotut a increased by reason given Interconnection arrange,:lent are party or parties of the new arrangement, then the other additional reserves may be required.to install or -provide in the full amount of su*ch increase.

(3)(b) Appl.icant -and- Ne ighbori ng nt it ies. w-it it ~i.r jTc connects shall .J`6oitly eStablish-and..sep.,ra~tel y~a

.,the minimun spinnifig reserv es to. be .Pr*C':i2d .Ie,C~

interconnection agreement, Unless. 0.

agreed ,upon, spi'nning, reserves. shall_ be ex:,resseot:.

a,per~centage -of pe'ak load. and:the.ifi!~. ~ff~

pericentag shall 'be ati!tast-equal to 0-0iCal~ ~. *.

reserve percentage'without the iritercon-:ýtlof. A .

Entity'shall not-be. required to po-vide'spininglr1r:,~

for -thatpOortion ýofý! Isload which -.iLrects thrctaý.2 purhass o Fim ower. -Wh tIle. d~fferer~t .,spiflnnWi - -V pecetagesimsy' be: spelcified 'invar-ious itr"iC:Cn agr~eemen6t~s, .no .p~arty-to an b~

equied-t shal proide a get-pr opi:1ei'J percentage. tha th, whc APP.l icantpoiesex fthe total +spinn1,ing re erves, Apl-~i ~spriý'~~

flYte reliabM.:lty equal tozthz+ -ex s.

Jitalnt "Iric -~

a given - ntercontnectfion -arrangem~nt are- iiicreascc ~ ýcr reason. of. the.. newlairrangenment, then the other. party:,

partie~s may.-be rquired to provide additional spi~i reserves in the full- amount of sudib incre.ase.

(3):(c) .Apolcn s'hal'l offrt sell, on riiasbnable termns an-i c'ondItIons,, includISiASspcified. Perli's1 , cap~acity Zt a

• Nigh~orng:nttyf~ u$-asresrveifsuch Cap;.;CJ.YIs

.wneitheýrnetded fo yst-ent no-r co~r.-tr

~ ;~cnt 1y commiftted tooIotL;-aI rs. 'ad if the. tiei 6hborIr Ent ityv otfferlto .sell, on- rea.s.01nable .termsýa~nd+.+Co~nhit..iQ:Is, iLS own -such cpcity to A~pp:icant..

(3)) Applicant may.l'niCluWi-i any Interc-onnlecticinare;.

Entity Io crJ~

Provisons requiri*ng :-Neighboring Appl icant: for*.any retervesý Ap-pl icant m-1 iss avail."lIe t itty t 1.ttyre~sult o.f "the fa4 e ossuch nEIih~r mai nta in a41 o any pr ftersre thsa:2 to-provide- in said int,tconnecttofl agrec-ii.r.t..

ppl ant halloffr-to c0ordirnate mai:-tanaflcC. SC~

• (3(e) withý:Neighboring; Entitie~s, interconnect,+e-'d wih Appl.icm and to 'xchange-.,r setlImainftenfant~e-chpcity. ard Crlu r!

when: siuch capacitya...nd:energyýarer aviai~a~.~adit reasonable 0o doAs 1,acconfaiice withGo tlt Practice,

-6 (4) Emrergency. Power App)licant shall sellwhich. eIergeflcy PO~er to a~nyI Irtercofl Neihorng Enity taintaifls th.e level :Tfi reserve agreed upon. I-ith. Applitavit, rand agrees tCO t:et agreILs LOse d.iltgence to correct the emergencyr -,II eeenypertoAppliCIant Applicant s-hall

.such transactions. if and when-capacityOther and, Prier-_Y fro.,

from; sOIC, such-transactionS -are avaiilable do. s0 without iqoairieý it.

extent that retail

-only to the.Applicn' can. O2 serceto. orwoesl orI arng its bil-,-ty. to dIshirge Iach -PMrio COI~T!OL..

(5)tOther`P.ower. Exchanges wi' Sh-oul`d- Applicantr have on fileIt or heeafter'fil, or rate ~~ue F-ed~oarl. Powter C-omini6114on&qreemWI~s dpu rchas of hr-.tenn ca;.

provIdi'ng for th ae

• and energy,, 1lnt d-.terlfl capacity edeeg, c.t econo' ener*gy-, Applicant% shaU capaicity and. energy+,o~r- +ai, ente Into like ,)r sir

.. oi arand: equitt~blt when such for.

• geeMents with rainy~elighbd~r.lO8--Eft.i~ty,recogrn.izing thi?;

0f -capacit~y-and' enrgf*y Iareaýtv-ail1abl~e, c nditionS. nd Gt;.**

pOast ex diffOeet eo~n onN .periene Utilty ractice.mayý Jtfy_ dif Wentpromtyt raes tirm1 S;V Con~on ns.- 1pplicnt-Sh- I respond Enils concerning0 1h av~aiity of---Weigqhboring its. system.n such :forms. of"capaCit an.eegJrom

.(6) Whiolesa 1e Power. SaIe~s.

Upon request, -AOpliicanh+t' sha 1-offer -to sel fIm, ful~

partIial. rei~u te.rent $lt: power.for a-speci fied pc r,* -t.Z.:

Eniy or D; st' g:ihbori ri e'IS ineconnecited 1-Ierj'ghbor~if.g btiion r-Sys-te ndraOtrCwihreasonabl!

coonditons. inc O'~:hrTWig.

provion whi'h 'ermit Ai'li~lican' recov.er-i~ts..Cost's,ý.' Sch w~hole'sale .pqu.er sales ~i:ust t

..cons is~tent. "ith Good*UiiyPrcie Applicz2n~ !5,-'.

not :be.-requ ired tosl rIm. Powve r at wh'Oesz-le f itC or ti M ssiSz not. have avai lable. sfici flt, g.ene'ration

-to:supply.the 'e*quested 'service or or..if 'tht sale woulld ir:.

service.tO+1its..retaifl customiiers its- fblt o~iv pr'ior cofluiiUren. s..

() TransmiiSSiOfl Services

!(Nfi) AGpptlcant shall transmit powerp-orsuantappropriate to interconnelction'.:

to Vt.0 aree:-.e nt s with *provisions Whlicl- are requested transaction end iwhlch are.. cons istiet with .Ch~es srice licel-se~conditlonis- Except as'listed ýbelow, suc t%..a shall be provided. (1)between tto or ainmrethan Enz:.iy s neighborinlg 'Entities.or-sections-of .a Reighboringwhich,*

sys~tetev whi~ch are geograp-h~itallY separated, -with (2.)

• Vow 'or.in the future, Applicant is interconnfected~ In the Entity *tith .whIchj., now or betwetn a -Neighboriqo.

is.tnterconntected aivd one or mOre. kei~boriflg f uuriIt Di stirbut i~onl:-Syst6fs. wlt~b.whlth:9. ntowi or. inh.0 future, Ett o

• It is ~~~~~~~~~connected, andX)eteeryNegbin the Appi icait S NLJiShboiritnt &Utrljbujtifon Systemt()with, ,.and.

f. irect. Interco 'nedt.iot any, other eeti oit u power sui Pp outsid the6 area thenal

• ~~~

Systemn:-enga~gingnbl Apict electricailly. served 'atreilbiplWt rcr o1 7nolt Ibe: .ei rd. totransi poer ahdolcri faIlt heoersh-W ef which has been nin~olwtarily tansere fr4C ppicat or (2.). fror .a, Neighiboring Ent ity for.-sale toý any" lectric. system~loated' So the, several..

outs idelthe. exteri or:gegahcbona by AppiC~ fay:

the~nelfctriclCll seved. atret aDi.stribiutlofi tra il SystE~

o-thr 1eghb fig Ewtty, ?eghb"rTA orAppTic-4n-_'iLes - oprchaSe' su.' poWer at an, equi'viei~tt

• price for. use w~itti nsI= areas. Aye1hboriflg~fiYP tran uusms .resn Iteighbri A.-g DistributAion' System(s)ereietng ice ,to Aplian servie salgver-easofla:1e -advance, not ofisshtl n equlremtst '.Appticant shall not e requ~ired. by thit Seto toprvde tranSmlssibnl erv, withi i~f:the* proposed trinisactionw-otfldý be t consi-iSte.nt' tnsissi 'on

..Good:Uliy Practic i the'ncS~

are cO ivtt~da,-t thei-tfme of the. requedis t.toC'. a....

facilities thepro o~hc serv-ic 'reoueste.'

full-lade-dd tri4

• rha.ve beeh. previ ouslTy reserved' by, Applifca'n forer~

rterss con itnt wit G puroeS lOopp f low.

Utilty ractiice;. provIded, thatwih re$P#C-t: -to teP~bi Uorthwes,-S tWest Int'ertie, Ablctsail -not be .rez44-r~4 ted tra nwSMJSlon ric'

-by ýthis Seton,to -proidMe -the-reques.t ff.AiwidlDt~PC~'sw use- ofwi~~

t-his faci'ity con istnt with the'-Bmneij AL t,(01Sat071 Act

'~rtbwest A gut'20, 193.7),. Pacififc., 1964) -and t-he -PublI 'Power Xariketing c (ta-Statt. 756, August 31 IIc. Works 30, 1964).

• Appropriations Ac t 1965.(18 Stat. .682, August

Q7)(b). Ap pi . :ant shallI incltae i n its. Plawinni ng-and' cOflSttuctiOPXY.or

• ro r m sch ncrease's- in its, trans~!iq SOlsca.-ac ICi e~~

such addit~ional transmissio fact iisa iyb (a) of :Hs for. the- transactions "eferred- to in paragriaph

. Sec ti or, pro'vide.d a~ny Neighbori-n g.I Ent~ity or Neighborfrig9 Applicant .suffic)ient adVcnce S 9jD~is -3btijoniSystem'gi9ve necess;*ryt.o-accolm,w-Odate its require;.ent notice as may'be *adpro'Iidea

.fe*m a regulatorY anid:technical st.andpo-int fr~her that1-Ahe enti4ty requestI ng.r,ffiSiolrlc. rsl comi4en-iates Applifl a or the: Costs .incurred as a be.

capacity willI of thd request. 1Where trans.'lss~iofl willI be' or.aoddit.i~ofal. trýan smn-is sioffticiIi titles servicehth to

• .i~ncreased.

insttal Ied-ýto provide-o eqe~o

• aKeN hbori fig Ent ity'or' NMi-.g.hIib~ri, 'gtstribution:Systen.,

rate. for u~se 's.

A0.0-tc*,ntImay. reqi'itre,. iný addit6W to a' other aCliiS.:tý pa$'mert of -Costs- assoc iated ,ith h' jnc . Ued capcty a fciti Irdidesshall1 be, q.ade Vin advance* of the~ir

- by the. partites in accordan"ce' with and faci-lities.

re speet Iv'e -use of t~he newv capacity-or (7)(c) tioth',,ing heir.ein .:shall1 on- require.-Applicant 1 to construjC& o additina trasnsissi fac~ilie if thi&sut~

such facilities is inconsitstent w~ith .oo Utliy"rctc hos~tructed withbut- dJUA1Icat.ft

or 'ifsuch -faclte cor .9r.vd trns (2). tn.

any,..rtioof .Applicat'hts- aretail customer or (3)- to const ruc trasmS~onsevi~t

.transmi~o usd the Area then 6.1 trically served V:. 2 ret- il by AppVi cart services (7).(d) Rate SchedulIes, and agreemeni~ts for transmission icant u 4.t t Provided under:ti ýbs Section -shall'.be' filed by Appl rates the. regulatory. a.Sency'.havin'g jurisdiCtion over Suchi and. a:greecmflts.

(84 Access- to Nuclear Gene'ration' (8(a ,f.a. IReighboriflg' Enti ty. or M e.Z hbor1ng9Distributicti.

System;ivrakes a tine."y request tc.AppliJcalt. for an oumnor ship part ici~pat-ion inteStanis'lau~s 10tc !,earuni Pr~oject, t for w-i~ir Uit N~O. I'or' any future nuclear generafting Uh AfppT~cant-.apple fo osrci..of pemi~it dur.ing. the 20c-..)ear pro jMrediat.y~lO il Uit the+date. of the constuction permi f~~ AflI~ No1 Appiat an opportunty to part'.

• shall offer the :requ~estjing par~ty, teasonable inI I :i-t cipate ¶n such units, up to an amourt

-9

• of the reeitive Icii-s of tho .- arttcpants. Wi th rtspect, to Stanisleass U1,11%  !:." ot .:yfuture nuclear geflerpt!:.

• unit, a request, for f i

-t1C i on Shal.edend ie:'

if -received wi18th1- Or* *!ys a",er tthe sialigbyApc:

to Wih-r g'Ef e and !:ci ht:cr ino 0Ds tr ibujt iVI.5 9f an afnncur, em~ent1 cfis intent. .to construct. the unft and a request for Jn expressi-on of- interest in partdcipa~icn.

Participation shal ! -ti on. a basjs ithich cv.npensates Aplcnt for a:rs~ shivre of all 'it's. CoAs-s., In ru

• an to be ircurre;, in.planni~ng, selecting ,a site for constructing. And ope~rating the -fac~ity...

(8)(b) Any* Neighbioring..n.. o any tNeighborlng, Dittributicn t

Sy~s~em~naki a ti61y request.0 fo atcpton +i.n. a nuclear, un1It MUSt. -car 4nto. a egailly bind-ing And enforce abe agree;en to-~~ efnnlltIOl1i~~~

shre.o t~i Costs+ associatedwtiatCPtf nh t uni~t and-.essociatee, trarn:1is'2iS~ofl facilIite~s. Uh le~ss otherwise agreed pi~caant, a 'Neidhboriflg Entity or 6Gy N.fe1g~hbori 9 D~istribu.i J yre destrinlg-partlicpatlon mu st -have signed such an~a agre.ent Within, orne yjar. after

• . ~~Applian hsProv4~e otht;ehori.-ng Entity or Neighboring Distribution, System pertinen financial, and data, bearing on tr~e feasib.Ili1ty. of the- project

• .te~chnical whi~ch .a -re Ithen ayalVb~ an .t. Applicant shall

-opp1 prov~ide addt& na ;mrinl dal, a!; they, becoa'.e aviae Auur ing t.he,_yearr The: reu Ing pigrty ý0halI pay to Applicant forthwlti titýhe adtoa expensesIrredy ARpTicant in nakR9g su inancial and techni~cal date

-available. In any.-Part,"CipAtion agrediteflt subject to tiSectionApplicant-May require provi'sions requi~r-s

• ~~

pyentb each :particifpant ofishref a l co6t inAcurroed up ote efate cr.the agroefiert:, reqy. ring each tpartici~pant, the~reaf tee Ito pay-i is+ pro raa. s.tare of fdi

. it they Jrie expended'-1cr. the p.arinltng and corist ructF11 w

• of. uiitts and- related fa; f.ties -a-ad-requir ingf ah"

• *. aricpaitt coaaeke such 41am ia I arrangsernts.as.mm_! Z

ýnecessary enuet a-bi-li-ty Oil the -participaht to co~tinuze -to make +such payýents.

(9)Zplsuemntati8o-&n.

(9()A". raeS, chags an rcices re2 are and shall.

be subject tpothe acceptance-and-appro-val of any regu!~

tory agencies or courts hav4.ng. jur:sdict ion.ove r.66the:

.- 6-.

c (9)(b). Nothing contained herein sha1 ellr p -Y rlgth~

Neighbori~ng .EhtA~tY or Neighboring DiSIribu?.iofln:

.to provide services to reltaii cus~totrers..af Apf 1-#

beyond.-the right-s they have. under stiote or federial (9)(c). 1Uothing, in. these license conditi*0flS sh.,1. b e 'c 0 . tr-.

r.;tst Contest>

• as a-waiver by Applicant of At pa-rtic'J appli cat ion of spy ca-Witse,. t herein to a.

factual. situation.

1(904).d ,The'se 1I-cense..cpndiltOns do not precl'ude.-APpi icarnt ra a.pplying*:to: any i-pproortate forum to seek sUch Cil.;Z tim - be- ppropri'a. i i-n t-xhese 'condittions. as MY at the' la waf Good .Lti iy

.6 odane k.the' with then-existing Practce..:w Thee icns cnditions-do -not-require ApplcatO (9)e*)

bec'omew a coeuldn: carrier..

C.' Th is irne-ndment'i's effective as':of .the.d.ateof issuance.

Ion kE.KtUCLEAR RtEGULATGRY CC'~I

• ~ u'er S.BoydDi rector  %

-Divtionof Project Managemeit'

• • Office of Nuclear Reactor Regti at 1Oo1 Date 'aeOf I ssuance: SM E06'1 0--6: Va

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATICKY clX?.G.1 SS;?

DOCKET NOS.. 025AD~-2 PAC IFIC GAS` AND ELETRIC .C6?ANY (Diablo Ca..nyon Nuclear Power Plant, -hIfts I and 2) 0,1,ISsOACE OF AM4END-ME;T TO. MST7UCTIC, A?::~

• NOTICE ued. n~~

The US.Nuclear Regulatory Coimmision. (,flC) bas i s ud and 4, resPect tvely.*, to 'Cons-tru4tion Permit,.o. CPR~edCPR9

'v ucltt  ;~.

to the -Pacific-Gas.andý Ellectric- Company for DiboCay' Pliant, nt n 2, loaedi11n~d Obispoq County, Californie.

d i~s.

The-iimeindpr.ts roVde.-for,the- additionw of crtain antut Poer Plnta not: subject'. to ai`n attrs 1. ~ i Th011wla Canyo

'eore raecer. zi~

under Section-.lSC: of the Atomnic Ehergy. Act,, as amended.

i u.e t~:

power pOlants aesUbject, to suck reiew. Howgever, in cormnection NRCs roedin9S, on ýthe -Stanisla ucear PPjet Pcific:Gas amn d Zlectrýic .

agee to include ant ttrust' cniosin0h~~ai as Coutiet C..an Canyon- l'icenses: in certain circumst'ances "which have occurred.

l(O),

d~ed Aorl ;J Ina , letter to the U.4 S. De0pitrt. t of- Justicei:

r he eent-a cosruCtion.per m .tfor :'.?e :s s2 PGE sttedhat 1976

.Was -not isse .by*ieNC ro o Juy, 78PE:.a Nuclear Proit ar Power PTr-_s, willing to _have -its lce~nse s) for thfe D!a bl o -C~anyo.0n NotcI it,,ents.

Unis 1and .2,,Amnded-to icoprte eti ani-trustco,,c Thism coningenmt w~lunS.as, th Wavsn Ito he r*t*C tha't" nC airtI truit hearing ws.neesry. init co0ntact 1o n W .it4~ ieI~i e:r~

dated .Vay 5,195 Project.,- The DW.provided Such advicie i~n a letter

Since-no construction perait *for the Stan! slAus Project-had yet been, i ssqed, the IIRC staff advised PG&E...in a letter daited September 15, 19783, of its intention to include-the antirs co~tet s conditinsi the'Diablo Canyon Construction Permits.' PG&E respneI .ltrdte September J9, 1978, stating that it had -no obj*ect ion to such' an amer4:Tent.16 The amn..et opywith the standards and requiremients.f th 'Ato';iic En ergy'Act of.,1954,. as amended -(theAct). an h oiission's :regulations.

The. staffhAas. made appropri-ate-fihdi'ngs-as. required by the Act and the ICuu snsrgaiosi 10 CR ter'I, -which,are set-forth in the

.amendment.

• In-accordance with 10 CFR -50.91T,-prior-'public notice of these -amendmerts was not required :si-nce the amendments do-not involve 'significant haz.wvds cniderati.fis..

The. staloff hs determninedý tha the is~su htante of thes~e amendments will not resuil-t in any significant _envi~ronmental impact and "hat pursuant to.

• lO- CR Seton55d) a*-environmental impact sltatement, or negative declaration,.and environmnental- impact. appraisal :need not,-be prepared in.

connectiton 'with,issuance dfthes i-eamedoefts.

-orfurtherdet'ail s Wiith'.respect to'thi actinse()lter related to,the amiendm'ents dated.ApriIl 20,. 197.6,- May -5,19 76, September -15.,

1978, and Se~te.r.ber -19, '1978, (2)Amndthent: Nos.. 1 and 4 to CPP-39-an'd CPR.49'" respect ively, andCj3) sta.ff' reae vla~n ofa r~e1~

to Inclutdi' Ant itrust Conditirons in*the Di~ab~loCan'yon Constructio4n. Pe.i:1.S

-All- of these iteats and Qther related mate.rial .. are *,a';llb Ie for public i I17.H :t r-et, . ,

'inspection at the Conmmission s Public,06cum-ent R~cr-.:':,

.iashington, 0.C. and at the Local PublTic Docum en. ~r locatt&! in San uzi s Obispo County-Free Library, P. 0. Sn 1o0's ~~spo1 Clfr189U

'request-'

-Acopy of items (1), *(2),; and ()mybe'obteirl.e'Iupofl wr~tteon C. 205551, ATTN:

• to the U.So. Nuclear Regul atory -Commission6,,-.Washinr-gci~i, 0.

Director, 7Divis~ion ofPoetMng nt, .Offic%ofl Nuclear Reactc Regul-ation.

Datd at etsdaryland, this' day of ,J.L197Is.

FOR. THE NULER EGULATOR Y C0,MISS QhnF'..Stol~z, Chief-'

-ght.Water Reactors. Branch INo.. 1 Divsio ofPrject ;4anagefient

TYALUATI-OM OF A"::;'.. TO ISCL UOE ANTITRUST. CONOIT~$SI!{f 2.CO PER 141TS FO0R THE DIABLO CANYD" 'TCLAI' 1PAT1 AN'D 2 u~TS The *Paci-fic tas -and Electric. COO.TandY Cnt ruLcti on- permits OPR-39 c~

Canyon *Zucle!.'

and CPPR-49.'for Uni-ts .1-anid 2? respec-t-.?y of thie !Ylablo Power.: Plant..

The constrctktion--permit for t-~i J, C11:1", -e s ir.s Led on April1 23, ov :U sly Dean issued.. It was IaStp

98. -No_amendvments bya re bi-ife to CPR3

'~ c e 13, l i;'ý :ejctehding t I latest defr coolet~ of on structt~ion..-.

hl' fo r --Ur.i1t 2,vi, onecem-bor'9, .19_70*.' 1974. The cintrsh J" rlt: 16.'-,

ae ugust 14, lat~nninettC~-69 was ; ed' ~e

.,.1 was 48 t tobdfified by.an -Oedfier *on. C ~~13. 17:&extending the latest date for c 6k~ti ow Const ucik Dia ~Cyon._Ruclear Poi r Plant s~ 1ot suvbject+

'Th to an, antitrust:

rev. ev under- Se0tion, 105C odf -thle. Atomi :s g Act,. as a'.mende, -a gre

'ow'Olant~s.-a~ -- Ub.4jct ;0theS9u1ch Heiw

.Koe.er, in reetncear Starnislaus Nuclear Project,,

oft..c:lotlvthtet Rsrodeddi lSs o0 rnt~itrust commitments Paietfic Gas and El ectri c Comnp~ ag9ret: to incd in~certaifl circumstances

,ln te-

• sý COp. hati ,,ccurred. ~ oay~~~~1 ichý Ow to th ltter. .s.oea~ of Jur:.tlce (1 J) daited: Ap ril1 30, 1975,

ntt for theSailu PGStisate~d that, ln;,he

eveqli a cons..r;.thfthe r or oj-ly 13 1078, PG~Era Poetws Wuceaii ts'issed by willntOh~e'tFliene~) orthe .bcCycNular Po.wer'Plants,

'Units I1.an _-'aiended to incorporat wai atitrust .codu'P.t'eflts.

~~jillinnesswas. contýingent u disn te.tR: ht oan; 5

trust.hain a feesr ir . A~lCi

.ih t icenlsiflg the Stanislauzs .

Project.- The OOJ DWpro~vided such 1ýdvice -a letter0 dated m'ay 59,1976.

permit -13r hdyt -i~Pric beein

• Si~nce no odns~truction- irn a l.etter datid Spebr 5 93 t1 fssued., IR -adv-is XGSE,

ý taf sl conditions in.

6f fits. inent-io tolinclujde:'-*eanti~tru- .c_ iton t.e "Diablo .,Canh`yoo Constructiutn Re'rIt-had' mits., PG'&t responded, 4n.a. letter da t a rA cbjectintsuha ndre.

Seoltember 19,1978, statig~

PO

o L", S .A.jo 1 *0'.' 40UC-42 SJP;_-mo'j xn;

!

• f*ýr S-!`:'-7-Td .4 iv. d .0 P844041nv 8 nc-Usepue D."!C' POOAP S.4 3TSd M4 'SZu" 4 _%1:10.3ul S 1- u P.uawe.;oaouens.S.1. Ou WJQ-33v spj jo a:olenssL 41,PIP, ý-n i IPauUO3,-V+' pajedaAd o.q; 10 Pow L-01eidOe i:ýPjl

. ý 4ow'.

P. I61-'0t1) ,1, ..--.:-,

- .. , i..;pap.,%+,-(bu='Se.q.

• • . --Al43. 01 ov.,turnsind,

. 1 011 Qq! 4:aZ L-0 Z.1 044..u.'. UOLGOMS r.1.0.1 A, -.:tOU S.*22dwt --DU lou14abp 411: 1

-4 J.%e ars'.1 WO ulp'-Sý! 1ý4 ;1MqPU8Wl 4 4 4 , 04 2. Japis 141 C'A'16 X. S SV CS24` U4021Ms L:7j L

aqj: U! Msojp pe: ld",-JamOd es ;),rW,'.':,uoXue3.

U11 uO -4 J.^ lsv 0 3 `44 T.P.11 103 04 ooiujida.id IS, A[Z tA PU;? a_ jo;'jjUqWSS&

e m i 1, S.S 0, ZVO Sze WPU S;r" q- a6f.4_ u! Suopliapi-spoo. pail ou P a 1.7 9(jaw"!, E-qj- 4. 4: u, sqj, fiu-tato Ituo:3" pu e .83p

-?U L A VA-84 S:j.p;S INN 0431 1L

-ZP"41 01"'SU0141. w-ZI-Ve pp?. P. Paau v Sý 4JNý A:J 4.-.,;; Lit u.p. I vnelsp ok; SS OA -U; Al-';ýW S-1 ativ. *S444

.4s 'S'W WPU OS041 JOA NO P.42" Md uaap.,j4q,+paq:D aj

-1124- pa p I pt.-Do C:

pf -4.0 jC Lidwp. sý*;W'J; ISU+03 843' uaaq. se u. vq:L al; E80401 OPýAOJd

.10 Cal-1: PWP -.40 Ila A? uf 0.3 :I-A Pe S4ýý` -uv woij out S T- PZ: 11.aj se.4 roo- 9,4 U.1 od e4s Isuipue

iJds Z!- 'S!U6M)LQLe attl '104"' SOPPl-3 63 PUP-j*jj#w' 4 4' r -LADJ St- *SuW*4'PU0ý: S-V 1M. .:.OE. L-'IJd 40J84-48:1.

.4%.- P41 04 WOW -Ja '40d AvOlOnN

R1 D'

?15d  :.L ePn 944. pusV12. 01 -.379d woik.-ýSanlbw

.4i d s 0 ut,1..844 -SJOIDeJ. 9S844 VO,:PaSv9 it-it oA low

EXHIBIT 2 QmQ NOTICES

.[Docket No. P-54--A]

RY tDocket No. 10-3-33 IC.-GAS AND F1ECWMIC CO NUCLEAR REGULATO POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF. . FACIF AttorneY GbnerdI's Advice and'4 COMMISSION AND) toAGARA 1ý W Tinmfta r Filing of Petltkk To, Intervene Receipt

• NEW YORK "T.,OWEr CORPk trust Matters

.VISTCT " "t onA OP pursu NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER I ting~ctS mlec . &

=rzisýorl

,tibo 205c of'hastherec~ived:

Atonpc Energy ftLkcnse 2 -OP.

amendia, a letter of ad issuance of Amendment to F'CH

• given that the U.S. ant to se *C as Attorney S eU.S.Nu Notice 13 I1 Oeneral of the Notice Is hereby given that th Nuclear neuak omsin (the Act of May 5, 1978. a copy uthe'Co- tates. dated clear Regulatory CommisiOn ent No. 23 Comel-ssion. has Issued Amendment No. vice frc mission), has; issued 'Amendmi No. D)pR- 17 to Facility Opeating Lcense NO. United is attached as Appendix "A". be af to Facility operating License Issued to the Poer Authority of.bf which erson whose interest may Nebraska blc Power 4DPR-59 'ny tykjirocidlng may. pursuant

46. Issued to the revissed the State of New York and the Niagara.

Dsiict (the licensee)-, whc :h hI = -2.114 of the Commlssion's

)e lonof Mohawk Power Corporation whc re- f~cted t Practice." 10 CFR Part 2. file Technical Specfflcatlos for for f or to sectk (th e facility) vised the Technical. SpecIfiCatci "RIlles o n for leive to intervene and re the Cooper Nuclear Stati Nlebrask. operation of the James A. FitzPatrick -a located In Nonal-A Cou~nty.. Of Its date 'Nuclear Power"Plant. located In Oswego quest petito hearing on tae antitrust aspects The amendment Is effective as Cotmty. New York. The amendment Is a ppllcation. Petitions for leave to of Issuance within 30 days of Its date of of the a:e and reqitezta for hearing(1)shall by Ibia amendment revises the "Techn*i*a effective Interven by June to. 1976. either peclnecatlws for the facility -to permit Iss~uwe, the Techni- be filed to the RC*,Docketing and Serv The amendm'ent changes Xtreet. N.W.. Waslh the caliration of intermiedi termediate ate range cal "Specificsations to specify lower lin- delivery on at 171*1H t2) by mail"or telegram neutron monitors ýon anm in water conduc- ice Secti D.C. or Its for the reactor coolant Ington. d to the Secretary. Nuclear D.C.

Reg range monic n <dicator ram *0 scale in tlvty and chloride Ion cop-entation.

lieu of indicator range sofle I0 only. 'addr-es Commission. Washington.

The application for the amendment Service Sem

.The application for the anendmeut complies with the standards and requlre- ulatory TTN: Docketing and d require-6cmplies with the standards ax ct of 29e4. menta of the Atomic Eclrvy Act of 1954. 20555, A' menta of the Atomic Energy A as amended (the Act), and the Commns-ton.... he Nuclear Ren)Iatory Comnit.s as amended (the Act), and th e commis- *Cor- slon*& rules and regulations. The Com- as ror..FFo; T sion's rules and regulations. The as mison has made Act aLp priate fings Coa-sios jIROMXZS ALTZMAN.

mission has made appropiate findings and the reqphred by the hirle. Antitrust and'Indemnittf required by the Act,,an th ,*uncmis- ft 10 ( sions ruke andregulatlons in 10 CFR C Group. Nuclear Reactor Rec ion's -rules and regulations rth--in-the Chapter 1. which are-set lorth in the ulation.

Chapter X whichAme I ' license amendment Prior publicrequired noUct ror pvu bl notice A~srTNOI'/ A

. license, amendment. tArequired a ths amendment was not

of this. amebdment -was no t ivolve a sin the amendment does not nIv-de a ". UNI NO I

.LAXS NtLL'U%"WICIM.

since the amendment does no o.sinlf t hazards coatioeratox. F.rAl significant hazards considetl that: The Commsion has determined that IDocket No. P-464"AI

• rneeof this amendm* nt will not the jissun-e of this amendrment will not Sth Mqýeted our %dekepursuant to resut in any Wmtfcgnt en Lronmentet rsult in any significant environmental live iswns of Section 10*c of the Atonmic to 10 C youh impact and thatpurstult ir connec impact and. that pursuant to 10 CPR 151.5(d)(4) an environmental state- the pro. Act of ilk4. as antended. of PlCI C OGS atid

• 51.5(d)(4) -azi enTvrIOGM ital state- vnmnl i1 the application K environ- mentý. neg*Uat declaration or environ- wit company to cotttrnict the Stanintlaus

. ment, neatire-decla" tion eed Dot be mental Iact p sl need not be tion Xctrte Project, Unit no. 1..

In issuance of mental - impact appraisml prepared , in connection ',ith the bssu-" preped in connection with Nute)~ alepartment haA prvIttumly rendered for several Iu.

this endment,. The' IlwceM ApplirtUiea . ,

janee of this amendment.,, -. aviý* cillUie with repect to which I' tecto o Iw For further detalls with respect to this ihe of the" brat

--jorj urther detail-- with the " AP rev (2) application for amend- clear Is n an applicant.

action.",: sm. (1): catioc. for action, see 19l7 applitiaon toe a license to January has beeetX's amendment dated March 10 NO. 1976, (2)" ient submitted by leter dated 27. to LI- w- T0 the then propoeeed Mendocino rPow DP--- 27. 1296, (2) Amendment No, t, Units I and 2. On Augimt 2. 1972.

Amedment No. 23 to License No. D1Plt-U,. and t3) the Comn- ermani suntemt infowmed Tour *rvdece*nr

46. and (3) the.Commissl  %*a conctr- cene A e "an Aon: alon te Safety Evaluation. Ilon that certain deecribed. onduct Srently -ssued SafetyWEVauAt pu ~ of hs via o public In- Cmi - lortcloee the.derelbpmenlt of

'to thaite=ms are aalabWlr thk Cmi~sslon*& Public by f-GA lt. bulk power supply 6ources Ln1

"-specton  ;"at _.th e H a' -pubilic smtCion- a 5 a and Central California had created DO. n* lt.R~o zl - - -7' -St ree.-1.,.,-717N.W. -- Street. N.W.a* Lion irlnonsistent with the antitrup-t D.CI.." at the wego Northe

-.. n-Wahl*lon d that conatruiction and operation or

.... Cti ty A 1 Second Street, a aitual adocino Plant by -O&" appekr-ed

.-'ubtas 683. I Is 13tmh (2 we 4 the Mie Maintain such antitiompetittve mitu rq~ad- -,A opitj Ztý 2)ý ýarld i0) may be lkl Aemodingly. we reoommend that an

';dr obtained a otained .4requet additlined to the &tion. it hearing be bold with reapect to the me Huckear antitrt nao application. Sub"quent to the Nuclear RegulatMr Commiaskin..

rashnstn..J.S Attention: D1- Mhendo g of that advic*. PO&IK withdrew the DtiTWM Washhwtnti, k).C 2058. of environ D..20565.Atteftio Dirtt ci*,v,1 tins Reactos noder ino applioation beause

,.I s:;, and mfety problems. Tiiereafter. the Dated at b d- aryland. this I" ment ieatc*tntnened a oomprehealve In.a

, sh Departi ion ilodee Itht antltrst Jaw. with

-o lityd-tetrm 3IX7 -p day-of~ 11 pomlble &nUtrnut tlon InInthe dla th swka /ft%"ors trict Court. Inieetiotiot was nefrlng completion Pas, That

/VtoamyW. Mu reque@ted our adyvie on POG&Xa OziEýCUIjLtrotm when-. tion.to participate in qbe San Joaquin, SClkkf.

'-..aacf 24..

Zacke *5reafloA t applies MWvoet (pom(p). Vn X40O~bern i teactor*s. &dvised The Cocuainalofl?1f oonne*o'

-rth iii W"N that, in the periodl sincet out!

m liat31411, L 41, NO, %-.-MONDAY. MAY IT. 1976

• -: 2O_& "NOTICES .

• licensitg of the unlt. In the event that of the'foUlw;l*K criteria: (1) Its exiting 1272 advice letter. it 'appeared that PO&E or proposed facilities ar or will be tech modIned certal*z of I antlcom- Po&Ers application for a construction per-may have Nuclear Project Unit nically feasible of -4trect interconnection petUtlt pra-cie which were the basi for mit for the StArnllaus with thoe of Apptlcahit; (2) all or part of our earlier recommendation that a hearing be I is withdrawn. or that a construction per-mit for such unIt" Is not isued by the Its existing or proposed facilitiea are or will held. As we stated In, that letter. 'Whither be located within the Service Area: (3) its the actions by Po&i ham been idf *that N*uclear Riegulatory* CommiLslon prior to primDrT purjP for owning. contraCtually

% altuation inconsistent with the antitrust July 1. 1278. PO&E Is willing to have its lice*se (s) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power controlllng. or operating generation facill an ant-laws no longer euxiMt and/or whether plant. Units I and 2. amended to Incor- tie. Is to sell In the Service Area the power States .triCk trust proceeding-on Unted generated: and (4) It Is. or upon. com which pors*te the commitments.

Court should be LtItit3ted are matters As a result of It review of lpCE!s acUtj . mencement of-operationa will be. a public amr currently being considered and which utility reguilat-ed under applicable state law th Dearmn -b indcted that In

• will shortly be resolved. would We Indicated that , tis cluslon of commitments in the Stanslus or the rederal Power Act, or txenwpted frorz because the Department shortly render In con- license is neesr to r e-eya ant-c- regulation by Tirtue of the fact that It is defntitive anti trusadvic on PG"& e it belevm to exist. federal, state. munlclpal or other public nectionf with the also'pendlng -opZ0the sppl:-

Stan petl've situation which - "ntlty D. *".Velgbortrng Dlrtributlon System-"

ncatloDfor a wicee alo Projet a"CO In view Of stur ZP dIL- 'I We 1m been believe or will that be none o Inconsistent O AU the with for a Met caUsonNuclear slaus financiy responsible privte or license condi- sathat no conditions to the Stanislus ooe ton . h dsrulno agreement to certMfn Itrmlted t~n pertaining ol.rl*wldwew voi te n. public entity which engams, or In good fith tionpertaing to NP. no hearing would v latno c t rdrt to proposes to engage, in the distribution of beno-lteSPe be neeessaXrelrL connectlon -- with

-neces-. Cthe lieseaeneesaerowsr.i are w-e'. In order electric power at retail and which meets each ro e we a'e gi-b of the criteria numbered (1), (2). and (4) In trg the ssua'c* of the S3NP TdvIC- a ugaon

.oloUwPng the incuslon tr attached o understand of conditions subparagriaph S above.

.. Into discusss the Departnient and r-garding anitrust PG&E entered concern to i.in the license. We that the D E. -Costs-" rmens e all eapital expenditures.

letter, sswensbeliev din by antitposed ncern pertinent will adv-ise the NulerU eglaor ad, istrlatIi-C. Vencisi. ppertin m and iasin e*n Ad whinoisch ~ e at ,c*o ,pt*

expersesA g*tU n*~Jaxes..depreciation%

tivities affecting alternative, bulk. power t~

Commiion enn~ that these ew~ com'dlUtis, wnicn tenane have been negotiated between. the ~ePart- costs of xapital 12Tluding a fair and resaon Ply souM lit Northern and Centrlll Call- reedY 2tutlo te able return on AppUcxnt's Invtment. which an pourne, Arn*O Onl ebrUary 197 P.19.1276. 9, March Mith 22. 22.19M *_tent .the ment and P wfh w anutirusttonyGn laws which are properly allocable to the particular serv eonz hti h s&dAprle requested fence, eu0ete the thelrwith Commission -5ouf to &fford

• theWDepartment Pu:%Tte tO e=t, ice or transaction a, determined by the regu if the Attorney 0en- t thorlty having jurbodiction over the "sddltional time for the Attorney General to -- We recognize that particular srvice or trosact-on.

erl advL-eas the Nuclear Re9ulatory COM' render advye on the StansI lal5 Ucense Ap- nt appth- P. "Ooo Utility Practice" meos those that th-pication In order that discussrios between tanlsus practileta rethods and *qulpment, inolud-.

P'te license condi*tons for the S pc&Z and the Department might continue. a would mn'am ing levels-of regere and-provsilons Xor con

'. We-ae nowd blhe to Worm the Conmise- Nulear Prok*tý s tingencteS as modlfted from time tb time, only that broader license OM410A _arno sien td

-"* thatagreement and, the Department ham-PG&E ona SttemDentof Con - - eemed neces0ary In the context of ti that are commzonly used In the Servioe Are' Accord3y. iproceeding- the In- to operate. rsltaly and safely, electro 'power

,I-tments which the Department believes faciltUes tW serve a utility's own customers posed,-- eltion in the commitnts of limited ex-will obviate the Anti-trust problems and economnically, with due re depen~dabil bte su ' activo 0&E5 byctiites inesa.wt nd hih c wit wllremdyceptions tl mhe , transmit to power PG7&Es In' general o way exTe Commitment to P to gurd for the consterrstion of natural resources m any legl requtresnt It iay I and the protection ot the environment of the trust laws Wh* c we believe has existed In-. fr-eto pGt Service Area. provided suchi practices, rneth wIofthern and Central California. Tbe State-4'une tttsoMta In cit mtances where such odf and equipment Ie not.unreasonably re Ment o Commitments, Is contained *n*the - transmit power

• attached letter ,to. the. Department, ' the mintmenta. f O. *7Ur Power" neans that p6wer which "Ipo&zprestdentcohn?. Bonnero . IMtsPest-. We understand that asouMd MX refuse i, Intended to be available to the 4kustomer at po&E denles that any Of Its poUiCIM-OPra'--In the future 'to transmit power I C'rimn aLUtlmzns and for whIch, In order-to achieve tic"s. hai r-been or-will.be Incossmtt stancs e the cor-tent d n.t r- that degree of avaslabilMty, adequate Installed r an qew res. an. s lent trams the antitrtst tr Bowel'. *-*" -; tawsranm iioto omscpweanrery o have these Commiten~ts Included AN reI

.seresg the right to bring 30gki scuou in tions Suclear to its license to construct Project;.-hathe .ePent thesail tha .R  : ,F ~*- propritate fumotherthan-the

',an - Nuclar )oad center are providked.

Depatrment_ oanc-hid that such a M,- KA.

chsee not to ionstruct the Stansl i ,u".th to tad then *ike nterconectm agreements negotiated Clear *cxntro . for'w'-ea Diablo,.Canymf Nodeaeet-. nwances, oulh virodoftat~o.autuutue

. i edwal thsheesecniins&alb "M o hs lsne cdin halb

',Opelaing itcesnse W~wrpst.' lrnits', And 3.' miodedl anthtrust asip cc anyr auhiso P, the 1.oZcfwn6 paragraphs A to !-We Alsm ufidrwtaa that thm Departmenat =huut`

t..at

~j:~~coePO~at5atoCrmtS ceusei:. *,._

se -

tS ondii

, -.. *tt i*hS ot- - -

• A. Applicant siell not unreasonably refuse o.~~h~fcalfo~h ~~~~~~2C si~ wetatiflof cc "

• CC Ub XtatWMMot CC6 Iritercombect .and operate normally In

._- - - -tbe'u e lonof ca tmemto In he -- - p;arllty4 M Neigbboring lntity. ar to any a .txteoWDc tith ay Heihboring Distrq~u "ag antloompti 60 lot C

-a o *act" t tha aybte Such aitre zencteonn shall be

-'hate come INO&. aW w freact 1 refuse to by tranIt pow- commn wit od UityI"l atie at policiesth should pVdeo ov -ir In, ch~ea" coV th * & In onii5ctlon shall be at one point

'jptros tppl5 *hh flOh15 -M R.

b pe5 .;.M ' ,s t antF' unless oth rwai naireed by the parties to an

' ee I ,. nn.on agrement. Inteconnection ea pshie'lo t. 1 a COMe *55 1* . mc 0 ax , , P4halt not be linited to lower voltages when Co-COP'r big.er vol"tC ar preferiablo from the Msand

'Io t od Utility 14ractile and ane avil*

a.' , point otf h*A Minter t e

. *No aow- ITo Akpplcant. AppI*.eU('-wy Include

-/ *e ere:Ie-*an s In any Inteetotinecon agreement proeviaons

-- A. AppuIet- 2 o "

M tbe Decesiasy"with respc t the poer fac tIkN a. saw wamige a th "Iicenmse. Distribution System mat" 0-s-cod Ur associated with its a,, rabl*

1, "OhND - JL !ervift Arew.'se that WV& V!

aite leW ota ananed by Apl Ut In the

~ ~ '- 'th exeetr gegveh~aboundarte.

maecriel see ttea.hd am* and wse -comparable a~ .4j opny e-aeee o U boring tutus, by Apptleeltt.. end tboda hat afNeighboringeM Cn to achieve this objective.

~ eo~hA~en ppjLba'l at'~cw "-- .. 3~the OOh * . Mky NMOOW Corpordh*

,0. Zntet onnCtloU agreements shall not

~~u~ee ~

ai hdit~t.t o eomtt~-~bot6eeas tIn poemte WA CeOD"e Call" marke eiiSe facilities or con

~~to ejc~ provide ftesom

~Sb~0~ St Intuhe 00

'~l 'en IL A- trot eqIpM&en Mt the point of Intereon ne-c Z,- tetatuded *A OditIM6 ,ZLbrtwPOMM, pfttht WfUbl@ eiat? U %6.3 th nerquired by Oood Utility M'ae

• o

? , -1 ~o d~nInV Oti-, . tM6nlee the parties utAually1 agree thvkt

__a  %

~-d~A~a't'bepe.5racul'tor,3

' sse~ In* patcat cUtrc~nv s warrant speCdal f&.

Q Abbef --. ,/..W let~$ ~D.

... osi t additional taclitiles rt

- ~1~d'8l~am -'-Viuru -- Ceb ~*'~w~w~ qeeeto ~-' 7b*e fteAII*)e fte the 3'bef?- quiried to provie service at the point of In Xi; AUMue SthegW~f 'te' Oto AY..... Sha16t10 o*.gs--.M

-,-U '- * . ,* .r r, u' C, *

-c . -. , th b f rib ,b"am,6- , *cce

.'m;

NPTICES 20227

-P -ty from the Interconnection 4Jter consigJ- exbtlng without a givea lnterconnection with them license conditions. Mtcept, am eration of the mrlous tiaruactions for wbik arroseent art increased by reamof theoIktd oh below. such service shall be provided the Interconnection facilities are to be use d. new arrwagement. then the oeter prty c r (1) between two or among more than two unless othei-wiss agreed byr the pertl... parties may be required to proide, &ddi N-ohb*-rng X=Uftia or section of a Neigh X. An Lnteroonnectionj-creement all ori tional spinning reasiv in &be faul anwacl boring Entitya ssteS Which are geographi.

Impose limiltations upon .the use or resale rt or such increaseq. cvlly pearated. with which. now or in the fu capacity and energy sold or exchanged und,er C. Applicsnt shal ofer-to sell. on reaso *ture, Applicant Is nteiroonnected. (2) be the agseement except as may be required IiY able terms and codltimon. Including a spec tweea a Nesighboring SnUty witk which. now Good Utnity Practice. - , , -Med period. capecity to a Neaighborng =

• or In Lhe SubArs, it Is 2ntsrooovctid and one P. An intermnnection agreement shall At tity for use as reserves if ouch capacity UL i or mce Waigbbng 1Xxstribution. Systems prohibit any party from entering Into cth4er neither needed for Appricant'o own systemL with whbih. now or in the future. It in con Interconnection agreements, but may provlTle nor contractually occcnrtted to others and nected &An (3) between any leigbb*r*ng that (1) Applicant receive adequate noth -e If the Neighborin Engtty will offer to sell, Xntitty or Neighboring Distribution Bye of any addtonal Interconnection arraun - on reseonable terms and cobdItiota its own tam(s) end the Applk:antla point ot direct ment with others, (2) the parties Jointly aom- such Capacity to Applicant. Inteconnection wih any other electric syp

'-eider and agree upon additional contractw kI D. Applicant may Include In any intercon ter engaging in bulk power supply outside provisions, measures. or equipment, 'whic Ih nection agreement provislrns requbIng a the area than eleCtricaly served at retail by may be required by Good Utility Practice.as a Nfeighboring Entity to compensate Applicant Applicant. Appcant shll not be required by result of the new arrangement, and (3) A; 1- for any reerves Applicant makes avxalablo SthIis 6eCU to transmit power (1) from a plicant may terminate the ftrtercounectio a an the result of the failure of such Neihtbor hydrcoectric facility the ownership of wbich agreement U the reliak~lty of Its system cor ngeEttty to maintatn all or any part of the has been LneoLuntarly trsnsferred from Ap ser*ice to its customec would be adversel Y reserves it has agreed to provide in aid plicat or (2) from a Neighboring Enuty for affected by iuch addltJons Interconnectioa I nterconnectionskreement. sale to any electric system located outside arrangement. X. AppUiLnt sa2ll offer to coordinate maln the exUrior geographic boundaries of the

0. Applicant may Include provis*o*s In : tenXIAn schedules with Neighboring Vntitles several areas ten alectrically sered at re btteorcoanoc~ac agreensent requfrbng i Iinterconnected with Applicant and to ex tal1 by Applicant It any other Neighboring Neighbor Ing R-Uty or Xeighboring Distribu change or sell maintenance eapeity and en* ZntiTy. *ekihboring Distribution System, or tion System to devlop with Applicant a 0o Sergy when asue capacity and exerg we Applicant wish.o.to purchase such power at

,ordInated program for landerfreqjuency )oaw I available and it to reasorabl to do so In an equiralent p-rice for use Ithin Wid ares

&beddingand ts separation. Under such prm Saccordance with ood Utlit Pructice. Any Neighboring Mntity or Neighboring Me grame the part*e* shall equitably share UHi tribution System (a) requesting transmson Interruption or curtailment of customer lod IT. MZmCX4Tv POTM servloe shall give reasonable advance notice iX: XZ=# COGOeWATION Applicant skall sel emeryoncy power to to Applicant of Its schedule and require negotete* any Interconnected 'Neighboring ments. Applicant shall not be required by totr sio segement Swhich maintains the leve of minimumntity re this ection to provide transmission service P.uraujant to these license conditions shall Ix serve agreed upon with Applicant. arees o i the proposed ,trumtion would be Incon oubject to the follwn paragraphs A use due dirtgece to correct the, emergeocy. Asitect with Good Utility Practice or if the through X regarding reaerve coordination: end agrees to sell Cemeency power to Ap neoeswaz7 trsnamimion facilities ar com A. Applicant and any Weighiboring 2t==3 *pDicant Applicant shall engage in sovch mltted at the Ve of the request to be fully with which It Interconnects shan jointt) transctis Wf'and when capacity and M loaded during the period for which service esbItlh and seprate17 maintain the mini a tE7 for sAch tmneectim a available from is requested. cr have been previoudty rmervee mum rmevwm to be Installed or otherwise Usa own generating remourcea. or may be ob by Applicrat for emern mey purposes. loop provided -under sit 2nboeronection agree - tained by Applicant from other sourcs but Dow. or other uses consistent with Good xment. Uwle otherwises , mutally agreed only to the extent that It can do so without UtIlity PMrtice; provided, that with respect "upon. reservw shal be expresed as a per Impairing sertvic to AppIlcanta retall or to the Pacift Worthwest-Southwest intertle.

csntsgo of sestmated frm peak looed snd the wholesale rowel customers or Impairing its Applicant shall aot be required by thts acc mftftnim Tsrvea Percentage ab*a be at lest ability to discharge jice 0mominnitn. t10 to provide the requested transarnaion

,equal-to ApplieWmat- planned r ese2rv pei. erice 3. It would Impair Applicant's own 08fftWg w~ttot the insteronnectlon. A v . arnza ?ovrz x~xn=;c~z, sOf this fucility consistent with the Don Neighbsrig Kntty, shall not be required to Should Applicant bave ca AMl or eetr neVsle ProWect Act. (60 Stat. 7l. August 20, prowde reserves for that Portion of its l0ad lie,-with the Pederal Pones Commission. 1937). Pacifc Northwest Power Marketlng whicIP It mneets through purchases of Flrma agreements or rate schedules providing for Act (78 Stat. 7M"August S1. 1954) and the Power WhIle diarent .0m. percentages the me and purchase t ashor-tarm capacity Public Works Appropriations Act, 1M (70 romy be specifed In voriant interconnection and energy. 12mited-term cap.city and en "t. M. A lut 39, 19).

serrements: so Perty to en Interconinection erW. Iout-term capecity "4 scowy or ecore R. Applicant shall Include In Its planning agreesent shall be required to provid a Seter. Appican shall, an a ftur asd and contrvction progreans such Increases im ga reeo .-percentage t1n Applica nt equitable bask enter Into lapj cc samilar Me Ur~saio~al- Capacity 4w such additional Planned resrve percentage. except tha1 1f the agreemonts .wt any NIeighboring wuty. rnonisuo tadlsltee as may be required total r2e01e Applicant inlle provide to when ouch sras ta ofCapeal 4 and OeWu are -for tb& i*a tcicmre tfrsrud to In paragraph s.aizitstn system reliablifty equal to that ex available. recognizing that pras experienca, A of thi Section, provided any Neighboring

. t whbout s vn m terco1 necton iWn diffMernt econOMi pdnic end Good

&J Matity of )e" baring Distribution System L* oge 'Isnreseidby won at V Utilty Practsce may Im" tif wuervat late. gives Appflosot sufacent advance notice as oasw~eslsl emelntlxheum the c*t potrt Or terms and coadrOm. Appicans ob&U 3oe MAY be eOsm 7rYto aCCommXdat4 its re.

-eoss may be required

• nsl om Isrov imam Ut b to m Ci NeIgborftg 3M-_ qu1irsmam grw a regulatory and technical ddl~na reserves In the Paol azount at t ttes concerning ale easabtiyyot eWack soaapoin* sad provided fUrthe that the en.

MiY requestng trsansmioolon services earn

R.App iest snA ~'2fetghbbrg - MoUtIfti Fpe-&e AWpiAcant for the CU Incurred as With -whch . ntotercounect 'Shaln jawnly TL w ic M* tm*POWW3 SAL" a reesult of the request. Vwhee transmisslon estbhad Keprt*Vel vmAltant mini UPcZn toueat. Appliant *hall off in to soln capity will be Increased or sdlitionnl im, spini*nC rrveesI be pwroidled v4 ft= M Or i requreMe POw ojuowe r truslmson tacilItime willibe Installed to SALIntaOKonMetisa AVreeMA Unless 0014Wr a spectied p"d to an Interconnect prOvide o maintain the requested service to

• Wine Mutually agreed upo. opinnin - _ve Weighboring Entity or Neigborint Distt*, at NOeibboriA ngKttY or Neighboring Distri shanl be - ; ase a P"s at peak tion Syse under a Can%%&&t wit reaso"abl buUo- £aetoa. Applicant may require. in 301164,and tse VNInbeumMM 1 cotage shell be ales4 eq)* toApiAar

. e Ve p Ier-MA ecadmitis lnotdsme -minm additoo to a rate tor wee of other facilities.

which Pfrtw Applicant so r~voor us Coes that paMent of Cots assoc*a*ed with the apinakag gloome percentg W~ttout the In '9134k belftsh le pw misslntau" be cou incresed eapacity, or addtional %cilltt#Re tcoe~ions. 6A NeigbbaMg - b~lly shel Misten Wilh Od V11111ty Practice. Applicant shall be tab" by tbA eruee in accor&ance Mot be reqUIred toprovide s"nning !"eat MINaII net be equired bo banl FIrm l'"Mo " with wan In asvmaoe their respective upe fwm.%M putioo eti "abd wsh ftS no Vbafteaf If ft Gve mock b~ave avsamlbe ovai of the now -aPacity Or faciliie.1 thod goneawu or trunsmsecn toe 0. 1a00ing hereiM Shall reQUire Appli Use, PsqW d Ouv"c or W Te mls . Oeat (1) to construt addifl.cal transmiA

-samre Uwe to fts retan euis"W or mes .aloo facifllti if the construction of such Is be"etsn pa o mas torinsoo aeeCM agree. etLiti Is Incentun with Good Utilty toVOLt d esawome r wtne t moi WrACIftea It sAh fael tieMs Could be con laentall dM 'beqe oto Wpivt a a we"" cd without duptI*etng any portion of

- rte" peorauisg than %tha h~ A. AppboaMn &MUltrannaft power pur. Applicants banommimion Qsysbe (it) bopro AgIpM 11 penivh opC Uvt tf the WWta suan~t 10 InMic elon otmeflb, w!t

• epata wemves Apphot MA Pst faIS PCaldWbk ors "qoprtet to The Ve at 51) to construct %rnweafkt' cuidd te area thnm electrically oerod at rtal by

• inlatao gstai relebfhty qua, totha queote troamsction and Wh"c are Corsistent Applkant.

a M O 14M VO 41. M 94--#OISAY. mAir i. 19/

• . Y,

2022*8 - NOTICES D Rlate schedules and &Mreements for In Accordance with the then-existng law tenton : Director, Division of Operating transmission services provided uander this conditions an may at the ti",e be Appropriate Rto!

-s-ectionshall be filed by Applicant with the and Good Utility Practice. at Bethesda, a Maryland. this wLThee lUcense conditions do not require I Date,yof April. 1976.

legulatory agency having jurisdiction over AppUcant to become a common carrier.. 29th da such rates and Agreements. Zhe Nuclear Regulatory Commis yrm. Ac-ms To xcUr.-aR G¢xn.ATION [FR DoC 76-14280 Filed 5-14-76)8:45 aml For I sion. RowZrT W. Rurr.

A. If a Neighboring Entity or Neighboring Distribution System makes a timely request [Docket No. 50-2711 Operating Reactors Branch No.

to Applicant for an ownership participation 4, Division of Operatino Re in the Stanislaui Nuclear Project, Unit No. I VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER actors.

or any future nuclear generating unit for CORP.

)oc.76-i4283 Filed 5-14-76:8:45 am]

which Applicant applies for a construction F1RR permit durin# the 20-year period immedi- Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License ately following the date of the construction permit 'for Stanilsauls Unit No. 1. Applicant Notice is hereby given that the U.S. PRIVACY ACT .OF/1974 shall offer the requesting party an oppor- Nuclear: Regulatory Commission (the lotices of Systems of Records:

tunity to participate In such units, up to an No. Amendments of Routine Uses Commission) has issued Amendment Amount rea.sonable In light of the relative loads of the pasticipanta. Wlth respect to 22 to Facility Operating License No. )ctober l. 1975. the Nuclear Reku StAniaaus Unit No. I or any future nuclear DPR-28 -Issued to Vermont Yankee Nu- On C published in the FzzD generating unlit, a request for participation clear Power Corporation which revised lators Commlisslon scisTza (40 FR 45332) notices of shall be deemed timely If.received within Technical Specifications for bperatlon of uiL R of records maintained by 90 days after the mailing by Applicant to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Sta- those s ýyteis Neighboring. Entities and Neighboring Dis tion. located near Vernon. Vermont. the NE LC w#Ich contain persozial infor tribution Systems of an announcement of This amendment Is effective as of its date mation about individuals and from which its intent to tonstruct the unit and a re Lforma~ton can be retrieved by an of Issuance. uch ir ,ual Identifled. The notices were quest for an expression of interest In par-ticip&Uon. Participation shall be on a basis The amendment modifies Technical Indiu-id Led as a document subject to pub Specification Table .3.1.1 to clarify and publih which compensates Applicant far a reason-licatlof in the annual compilation of Able share of all its costs. incurred and to refine the requirement governing oper- Act documents.

ator response to a failed also instrument r be Incurred. inplanning. selecting a sits for, channet. This amendment makes proa constructing and operating the facility. osed amendments of the NTRC Sys minor ediPtoral changes to the Techncal o Lf Records were published in the Z. Any Neighboring .Entity or any Neigh- orrect Tthe re- tens boring Distribution System making a timely inocrtlitiona cand . Rbxms, oli February 5, 1976 Oficatiron mend re rtnst fre- (41 1 5356) proposing that the follow request for participation in a nuclear unit, must enter into a legally bindlng and en- QUeny of environmental reporting from (Z1ZR established as a routine use for all ln~be forceable agreement to assume financial re- monthly -to annually consistent with the (4g be NRC systems:

sponsiblUty for its share, of the Costa a-And. changes of Amendment No. 17 Issued No the vember 5 1975. rhese changes to *sure may be made to a Congressional ated with participation in the unit D13l0orn the record of 'an Individual in re asociated tranml'lol , facilities. Unless tnvironmental rtporting frequeny were otherwise agreed by Applicant. ai Neighbor- Inadvertently omitted from Amendment omc f to an Inquiry from the Congrieseyonal Distribution.Sys NO 17. sponse ade st-the request of that individual.

Ing Entity or Neighboring must have sgnedu tom desiring participation The application, for the azplndmen ameidmnent is intended to assure such an agreement within one, year after' Thle standardA and require- U tle Prhacy Act Applicant has provided to that *eighboring complies with the that Irot plemeritat&Jo Entity or Neighboring Distribution, System, ments-or the Atomic Eneriy Act of 19-54. have the Unlniltended "4frect of as aplended (the Act) . ani the Commis- does n gindividuals the benefit of Con pertinent financial and technical data bear-.

Ing on the feasibility of the Project *hichn lon's rules and regulat"on in 120 C.R denyin nal assistance which they request.

Are then available to Applicant.-ApPlicant mission' has made as)pr late ftndlings geo mendment would obviate the writ shall provide Additional pertinent dats_9 as8 required by the Act "nd the Commis- This ajnsept of the individual in those they become available during the year. The -* o rie" and regulation-In fort In 10 10 CFR.- *en ten co co where the Individual requests as rules wan e u requesting party 'shall pay, lo Appllcant whih kre set forth-in the 1- ca*se*s -e of a Member of Congresi which expenses Incurred Chapter I.

rorthwith the additional by Applicant In making such financial and cense -amendmhent.was Prior .publlc notice of slstancentail a disclosure of informt~lon this amendment not..required since would ins to the Individual *Ithin ,a technical data*avlable. Zn any perticpA Lion agreement isubject to 'ths Section. Ap:, Vie amendment does Inot Invohvei sixe- Pertaft pUcant may require p;ovisions requirnOg payf,-.- lfcant hzards consideraion, systemrested persons wer'invlted to sub Oient by each p cPaont o~r Its share 0; all c-,rI The Comm=ssion has detoermined that Inte ritten comments aft the proposed vosts Incurred u)I to tbe date of t* agree-. the Issuance of this ameodment will not milt wi thtreaftb? y March 10, 1976. Nb commenta ment. requiring each participant 4n &Ml slntfcait environmental rule b been received on! the proposed.

to pay Ilt pro rata-shae of fundssas -they result Impact and that pursuant to t0 CFR have ments. Actordingly. the Nuclear are expended -for the plauning &Ud ,on.

unite an telated facilitles. and I bl.5(d) (4) an enirrronmnental state- amend story Commisslon has ddopted-the struction, of ftguepla mnents as propose*.

requiring each participant,30 make such A-" ment. nekative declaration or envil'on need not be amend nancIal arangements a way .be ZOeceeO y mental Impact appraisal Luant to the Atomic Energy Act or to' ensure the ability .o1 the participant '10 prepared in OoMeneton with LJsuance of "- pUr, 1954., as amended. Upe Enfrgy Iteora d*

continue to g*.ke such Itsy. -n.. - ,.. thi alindmlnt..

an Act of 1974.r* amended, and ZXrTA~TOWX 1"WFV&iI ' . 7IP' further details.,ilth rre, et to this -rdstic S52 and 552a of 'ltte 5 of %the

,r , action. "'afet (1) the application for Suor A. Al l-ates, charges.. -term and States Code. the following amend sha.ll be Subject to~tbe seePtawt ies mendll'ttt datod Decembeir 8. 1915, (2),1 United to thi Commisilon's Notlces of.

are and No. DPR- inents s of Recordi are published as a eortanapr'slotfi~t.

appoval,, SPnylawts7 agencse or Amltrxidfntl No,. 22 to Licensee related Safm courts having -juisdction aWm ,S.t,= hem.. 28, 3)'.the Commssion's eafeti n subject to publicaUonlin the S. 10tht Di iotained'barolfl sha~ll enarge K auiAton.ri (4) .AmenwrAien% No.. 17 doeumnIent -omptlationoT Privacy Act docu amy, rights edia N(eighboring Xntlty 4ir Pleigh I Iýt u M no

.- DpI(-43 bu No. es- &m borinDt.stdlbutIOA eysem 't.o i - 1M,8. and lated documents. All of ment.

ess to retail tutomers Ap ca b" - thes.Items arn avallable loe public in- T1 X N Bystemns of Records are the righta they Uee undeir statec~~o" Publc amend dby adding the following ?e

,r*,-*, . , m* . pectlot.at.. tht om. 771 Cnmmsonla tet.NW.e-l1 am.' nllb Use to the Prefatory State low. hl n?] tee.MW otire C. Nothing In thnlicense abi Dcumnt .e of Oeneral Routine Uses: * "

be construed as a waiver " Applicant at Its Washi twool. D.C. and atn*Street.Bamt t rOhe mernt 224Main or OtHERAL rights to eontest the applicaton ot an? COM- liemorial L~brarY.A CoPy of Itemsn (2). (3) tUATOYT STATINMEK PR caltinsnt herein te a particuWa fsetUa)5itus. "tieor Vermocit.

tRoriltnz U,,n

. '- e6 ,*..*,

D -.

following routine uses apply to ttV U.8. ReAtreatorA The set forth eludeaaddremedSo Cnmmspakm Washhwton. D.C. M53. At, wh system of records notice prisate for=. to sok such ehanges-tft

. ""O"A ".VOL 1" 0 41. H.94-MO4IOAY.

W MAY 17. 191"

. -. , r"'*_ -

• . , _.. . , ,:* .,.S,*.

EXHIBIT 3 P.

P.03/10 WAS*ITONO. :l SI NUCLIAR uM~cULAYCMMeo 15 l978 q'***"SEP 0-275AS ties. 5 Docket 50-323A p-564A Pacific Gas and Electric CompanY ATTH Mr. John C. Morrisser t and . el Vice Presiden 77 Beale St*reet 94 0 Nucl ear Plant ,

S an F aR e " D iablo Cany on Units I and 2 Gentlemen: addressed to the Assistant Atrney 3D. 1976, state~ stc.teAi In 0,letter daetd AVri Divion S - opn d~as follows:

General. Antitrust Company d oftepacif ic Gas and Electric to tI Suclear is* herewith submitting the oftheci ~Ga an~. *0u*

u~ ~ ~ c h~aY* ~ltet lcrc attached i.o*cluded---,*

nstater I as condftoe$s i n U S. Department of justice the osen to have n ?Ps t-oprating license iatio s*dbonythe t p~andZ is willingpermit o open of l constr-ucton son forandcons ee tion and th 1 01ton the constct" 0 Regulatory Comnsi n Ic itfotheato antitrust h e

StanislaUs Nuclear ProJect, Unit Is.sill that t trus . the~r th no t aenit advise the Nuclear Regulatory CO Iio e unrmit a* fn th s is neces in connection with the licensig of ,

event lauta uclear project Unit I i applicationfraorprtfrte thdruclaw egulatory lI Stands.

neeslGandEls

... eit is not issued bY the Ma ts laCetsers) ue f.

willing to have ,itlice Is . Units I and 2, a s or nse piermi

• riob to toCulyr sul h,7un powerc Plant

'uclear n porate the Cormit,,ents o* Naoyi5 76,C Asistanet Attorney General advised the Nuclear manSfy othe to the -Co t a, ic nses issued by ,the NRC DoV y s 1, 976 we r st hearing would be

• for the St&nislaus project wat c sY truthaigwudotb SttmnfCwenitmfeEntS. an anti Nuclear ProJect Unit 1 permit for the Stanislaus To date a construction Accordingly* in keeping with the above quoted lntent;Ion has not been issued. this is to edvise you that it is our present Company Compasy commimuent. CPPR-39 and CppR-69 issued to the to *mend construction Permits 9 1970., respectively., for Diablo Canyon on April 23. 1968 and December 2 to incorporate as conditions the Statement Nuclear Plant. Units 1 and the ComPany's letter of April 30, 1976. We to of Comitments appended to the Cmuimssion's regulations expect these amendments to be issued pursuant sometime in October.

Sincerely.

Antitrust and Indemnfty 6roup Ieactor Regulation Office of Nuclear DOJ cc: Donald A. Kaplan, TnTpI P.R."*

EXHIBIT 4 AUG-08-2002 13:34 P. 02/02 aas -* B X.B C T 2J1i C c Cs C) 3\[ rl=alt*ff

-IT^1 rSOJ2Th-E

• S 40Q 1 (415) 70l. 21 I SAN FPANCISCO. CALIVORNIA D Q'-- 77 PEALE STREET JOHN; C. MORRISSEY VICE puC2I7Z-r ni atrtp.crn%

September 19, 1978 Mr. Jerome Saltzman, Chief Antitrust and Indemnity Group Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Saltzman:

Docket Nos. 50-275A, 50-323A, P-564A and 2 Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units I letter of in accordance with the spirit of our 15, 1978, of September April 30, 1976 quoted in your letter has no objection to the Pacifiq Gas and Electric Company as proposed in your amendment of the Construction Permits letter.

Sincerely, cc: Donald A. Kaplan, DOJ Znt.

TnTPI P.F12

EXHIBIT 5 59934 ' NOTICES )

75901-M]6 The staff has determined that the Is.

"[ suance of these amendmients will not

"(Docket No. 50-320]" '[Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-3n3) result in any significant environmen (Doket.2 tal Impact and that pursuant to 10 PACIIIC GAS &. -ELECTRIC CO. (DIABLO CFR Section 51.5(d)(4) an environ

,METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. ET AL. NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS I mental impact statement. -or liegative S- .CANYON Issuance of Amendmenf to Facility. Ope&v'tiRg AND 2) N, declaration and environmental impact need not be prepared in con Lcene IoA mappraisal "L"et Isguance of Amendment to Conslruclion~ nection.wlth issuance of t1bese amcnd Com- Permits ments.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory has issued mission (the Com~mlssion)

• For further details with respect to Amnendment 8 to Facility Operating The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com-mission (NRC) has issued Amend-' this action, see (1) letters related to License No. DPR-73. i.tuvd to the thie amendments dated April 2D.-1976.

Jersey tients 1 and 4, respcctively. to Con- May 5, 1976. September 15. 1978. and Mc:tropoliLtn Edison Company. struction Permit- Nos. CPPR-39 and

-Central Power.& Light Company, and CPPR-69 issued to thePacifIc Gas.and September 19. 1978. (2) Amendment Pennsylvania -Electric Company. for Electric Company for-Diablo Canyon - Nos. 1 and 4 to CPPR-39 and CPPR operation of the Three Mile Island ;Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. 1o- 69. respectively, and (3) the staff's re cated in San Lpis Obiifpo County. Cali- lated Evaluatior of an Amendment to

.Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (the facility).

Include Antitru*t Conditionsin the located In Dauphin County. Pennsyl- fornia. Diablo Canyon.lSastruction Permits.

vania.'The amendment is effective as The amendmenta provide for the Fid-dition of certain antitrust conditions. All of these items and other related of its 'datpof issuance. material are available for public in I'he license is..amended by' revising The Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant is not subject to 105C- ai antltrt-.t spection ulcDcmn~omlctdi at the' Commission's Public a certain ,IechnIcali:'Sp~cifications

.,bratl -,.,-r..cc PC," to- revetncerpwrilnsaesb of the Document Room. 1717 H Street. N.W..

permi permit. operation'at*reduced po..cr review under' Sectio~n More Washington. D.C. and at the Local Act, as amended.

lev6ls -with .rcduccd'.reactor coolant Atomic Energy San In P.O.

-s.

.The ysteri applicationsystn~l~.,.r~~QX4 T amendment tflow.for.,thc-ýmendment 40 Ject tto such review: However, in .sub-

,recent nuclear power plants are con- Luis Obispo

-Public DocumentRoomCounty Freelocated Library, S-nection with the NRC's proccediligs Box X, Smn Luis Obispo. California' S"..' complies 'ith the standurds'.and re- on thleStanislaus Nuclear Project, Pa- 93406.

""utremen`ts-`ofthe,:Atomic Energy Act cific as and Electric Company agreed A copy of items (1), (2), and (3) may include antitrust commitments as be obtained, uponRegulatory written request to.

%.of1954.. vaýsljeiidd (the Act), and the- to conditions in the Diablo Canyon 1I- the "..S. Nuclear CommLi

• Commissions' rules'afnd-rigulations., D.C. 20.555. ATTN:

a.de*'eppr - enses in certain circumstances which sion, Washington, SThe"'Commlssion'-as' Director. plvision ofProject Manage aid -have 6c.urre. . .

":itefindings i nlighs's- a*ofluiied bylhe Act In a letter to the U.S. Department of ment,'Office of Nuclear Reactor Regu (DOJ).that,,in dated the event a 1976. con ltion.

t o_.e*--C.* +:*e fd~i:Ir~t*¢i+`+i-eifijejndCh^ptkr*- I-,ywhIch - i-e-.Justice stated-*

it.**'-; PGE April*30.

,_ se*.,.. stated ta.rnthe-evst aAcn-a Dated at Bethesda. Maryland. this ftosrtlrit'*inth

,.*et 6th day of December 1978.

""ht~h7*1l" e'Cin'di- imined -t*S.ruCtionl.j.drmit -Tor -'the- Stanislaus is *ai~iendmenIt Nuclear P.. . ect was not issued by the

• • ywll.~ ti*tx .i~fic*if envi+*:;NRC prior. to July 1. 1978, PG&E was, FOR', THE NUCLEAR REGULA

.+ :thl:*th*Pir-ua-" willing to.have its license(s) for the, '.TORY COMMISSION., ,

• ,VDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plants.,':, JOHN F. STOLZ.

-:--t Slenviinme ,Units,1 and 2. amended to incorporate . "Chief,,, Light Water Reactors tpac state'me'iit"Ot

. ........... . .. antitrusttBranch n.ommitmehts.

ant This NO. 1, Division of Proj.

"XUo:gavionnnana eno e al"..willingness was contingent upon the' ect -ManajemenL redn con*.DOJ advising the NRC that ,nc anti- Fi8 8 arnl

• priafl

-tonwiththhs action." '+"+ *'-:- trust hearing was necessary hficonnec- -_*___

. r*- .with licensing th',, Stanistlaus .

8 'provided suc" -. 75"90-01-M]

• _thls

• to" Pacil~tY. action.'see+(1)(xAnienidmrent Op-e-rathigF*ic.ense*

VNN6.1 -;ProJect..

8. .,-advice in a,TheletterDOJ datLcrMay 5. 1976. , -*

=e;; Since notonstructifn permit for the - ' " ' [Docket No. 50-312]

' R -73,an5i tfpR (2)e the Co utotsla iiision Project had yet been issued.

ated .safet

/Anendrnent .No. .8to ,Fidlity.+Op*

."' ,the NRC staff advised PG&E.*In' a . SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 15,'1978. of its . Issuance of Amendment tdacility Operating S

.. gU&eav"aalalfor-bb*ipetd e T& Tletter t -'-thiintention dated to September Include the'ahtitrust corm uspeet_mitments as conditions in the Diablo .

0the- nission -cumPub .- .ent Canyon Constructlon-Permits. PG&E 'The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comn

--Roorii-1717 H5tjeet7N..Wahing responded. in a letter dated September tMission (the Commission) has Issued 1978, statingthat it had no objec- -Amendment No.*26 to Facility Qperat ton,1D.C.'-ad at.the.Sfate&.Library of-19 tion to such an amndmerit.. Ing License No. DPR-54, Issued tgSac "Penealth

-amendments wlith 'the ramento Municipal Utility Distrij, WilnutotStibets;)IarPennSY1 v-nia 1. 2. - . , ..--

yomply

- s Theard ad 'reciuirementts' of the .- which revised Technical Specifications e Rancho Seco 'Nu ethesda*Mrlnd.- S. ';rn_.*h. A-to-tice Energy. Avt of 1954. es amenld- for operation of the S. ..=.li*-th:daykh'd"-y'bf _6fDec+ r'[7.... .. :*., :/,.ts 0r g (the, Det b~r'i8.Maryland la in Act) . ... the -Commission's clear Generating Station (the facility);

- . "'anc

- . fe8 .... -" regulatlons,'The staff has made appro- located- in Sacramento- Couftjy. Cali EGuJA'- priateifindings 4 required by' the Act fornia.date The .amendment is ekectve as

"--- j-.-FOR T.C9.SIN

" --THE 1"UCILSAR. . --- +*S -. - andi.tGle qmmisslovs regulatioons in of Its of Issuance.

-.-R T '.COM STEIO"*., " 10 CF,.Ch-aptd,l, which are set forth calThe amendment revises the.Techni

.4),-

Si - i A..VYRGAk -,',In the ahmendment. .. -' Specifications to reflect plant oper

":;'*:*x:-h.ht-! Waterý.:Rcactors.*'.-',/n-.accordaice withi 10 CiPR 56.91, ating limits for the fuel'loading to be Branch'4,=Di'son"of P roiJecit ,}']'rior' public notice of 'these amend-, used during Cycle 3.

. wks not required sivce thý". ,The application for the amendment

. Managcm@ti.. . .ments inilolve significant ,cdmplies. with the standards and -re Doc. 78-35563 Filed 12-21-78 8:45 amlj amendi ents do not b.1FR of the Atomic Energy Act

<lfdsconssderato 1,-az_ '

] , o quiremen6s

• '.-' 4-/

+.

-" - FgDERAL REGISTtR;'VOt 43, NO. 247-FRIDAY, DECEMBE, 22, 1978

, '.*-. +;

4=:,.-...- .. *..% , . .

-' .,' .+ " + . . ,.

.,, .2 i. -. *

..  :, .*.. .  : 4* )J: 4. . .....

-. ..+ -, ~ -,~~.. .,. - ,:v.* * ..

"