ML022380254

Brief of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in Response to Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-02-18

ML022380254
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	08/22/2002
From:	Repka D Pacific Gas & Electric Co, Winston & Strawn
To:	NRC/OCM
Byrdsong A T
References
+adjud/rulemjr200506, 50-275-LT, 50-323-LT, CLI-02-18, RAS 4774
Download: ML022380254 (60)

Text

August 22, 2002 UNITEI5'STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKETED USNRC August 23, 2002 (3:24PM)

BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of:

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

(Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

) )

)

)

)

)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Docket Nos. 50-275-LT 50-323-LT BRIEF OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLI-02-18 "7i~-vy~ ie

- recqv-

"~RAS 4774L

&ecVozL-.

TABLE OF CONTENTS I.

IN TR O D U CTIO N..................................................................................................................

1 II.

B A CK G R O U N D....................................................................................................................

1 III.

D ISC U SSIO N.....................................................................................................................

3 A.

Background on the Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions.......................................

3 B.

Authority to Retain Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions......................................

7 IV.

C O N CLU SION.................................................................................................................

12 Exhibit 1:

Amendment Nos. I and 4 to CPPR-39 and CPPR-69 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant), Roger S. Boyd (NRC) to John C. Morrissey (PG&E), dated December 6, 1978.

Exhibit 2:

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Receipt of Attorney General's Advice and Time for Filing of Petitions to Intervene on Antitrust Matters, 41 Fed. Reg. 20,225 (May 17, 1976).

Exhibit 3:

Letter, Jerome Saltzman (NRC) to John C. Morrissey (PG&E), "Re: Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2," dated September 15, 1978.

Exhibit 4:

Letter, John C. Morrissey (PG&E) to Jerome Saltzman (NRC), "Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2," dated September 19, 1978.

Exhibit 5:

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2);

Issuance of Amendment to Construction Permits, 43 Fed. Reg. 59,934 (December 22, 1978).

i J

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL STATUTES 42 U.S.C. § 2132(a)...........................................................................................................................

4 42 U.S.C. § 2132(b)...........................................................................................................................

4 42 U.S.C. § 2135(c)(2).......................................................................................................................

4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CASES Ala. Power Co. (Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2), ALAB-646, 13 N R C 1027 (1981)..........................................................................................................................

9 Kan. Gas & Elec. Co. (Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1), CLI-99-19, 49 N R C 441(1999).............................................................................................................................

7, 8 La. Power & Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Generating Station, Unit 3),

CLI-73-25, 6 AEC 619 (1973)....................................................................................................

9 Metropolitan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1), LBP-81-32, 14 N R C 381, (1981)...........................................................................................................................

10 Ohio Edison Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1), CLI-92-11, 36 NRC 47 (1992).............. 8 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-77-26, 5 NRC 1017 (1977)......... 6 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-83-2, 17 NRC 45 (1983)......

6 Private Fuel Storage, L.L. C. (Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation), LBP-00-6, 51 N R C 101 (2000)............................................................................................................................

10 FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2);

Issuance of Amendment to Construction Permits, 43 Fed. Reg. 59,934 (Dec. 22, 1978)........

6 Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Receipt of Attorney General's Advice and Time for Filing Petitions to Intervene on Antitrust Matters, 41 Fed. Reg. 20,225 (May 17, 1976)............ 5 ii J

August 22, 2002 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of:

) )

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

)

Docket Nos. 50-275-LT

)

50-323-LT (Diablo Canyon Power Plant,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

BRIEF OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLI-02-18 I.

INTRODUCTION In Memorandum and Order CLI-02-18, issued on August 1, 2002, the Commission invited the applicant and the petitioners in this license transfer proceeding, as well as the California Public Utilities Commission, the County of San Luis Obispo, and the United States Department of Justice, to address the question "whether the Commission has statutory authority to retain or impose antitrust conditions for commercial nuclear power plants licensed under [Atomic Energy Act] Section 104.b." Pacific Gas and Electric Company ('TG&E") herein responds. PG&E concludes that the NRC does not have the statutory authority to impose new antitrust conditions in connection with the proposed license transfer.

However, under the unusual circumstances of this case, the NRC does have discretionary authority to retain the previously adopted antitrust conditions, modified to apply to PG&E's successors.

II.

BACKGROUND This proceeding relates to PG&E's application for NRC approval, pursuant to Section 184 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended ("AEA" or "Act"), and 10 C.F.R. 1

§ 50.80, of a proposed direct transfer of the operating licenses for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ("DCPP").

In PG&E's application, dated November 30, 2001, PG&E requested the NRC's approval of the transfer of the DCPP operating licenses in support of a comprehensive Plan of Reorganization ("Plan") for PG&E. The Plan will allow PG&E to pay allowed claims in full, with interest, restore equity value, continue the employment of its current work force, and emerge from the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.

As discussed elsewhere in more detail, the Plan calls for a disaggregation and restructuring of the operations and the assets of PG&E's business lines. The majority of the assets and liabilities associated with PG&E's electric transmission business will be contributed to ETrans LLC ("ETrans"); the majority of PG&E's gas transmission assets and liabilities will be contributed to GTrans LLC ("GTrans"); and the majority of the assets and liabilities associated with PG&E's generation business, including DCPP, will be contributed to Electric Generation LLC ("Gen") or to its subsidiaries.

ETrans, GTrans, and Gen all will be wholly-owned subsidiaries of PG&E's parent company, PG&E Corporation (which will be renamed).

Reorganized PG&E will retain most of the remaining assets and liabilities, and will continue to conduct local electric and gas distribution operations and associated customer services.

Reorganized PG&E will be separated ("spun off') from re-named PG&E Corporation.

The NRC operating licenses for DCPP presently include antitrust license conditions (the so-called "Stanislaus Commitments").

With respect to these antitrust license conditions, PG&E is not proposing any substantive changes in connection with the license transfer. Rather, PG&E has proposed that the antitrust license conditions be carried forward intact. Gen, ETrans, and Reorganized PG&E would be designated as licensees specifically responsible for the antitrust conditions. In effect, for NRC enforcement purposes with respect to 2

T7 the antitrust conditions, Gen, ETrans and Reorganized PG&E would be jointly and severally responsible for the antitrust conditions.

PG&E's proposal is specifically supported by the Northern California Power Agency ("NCPA")' and the Transmission Agency of Northern California ("TANC"), et al, the petitioners in this matter with antitrust interests.2 III.

DISCUSSION A.

Background on the Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions As recognized by the Commission in CLI-02-18, both DCPP units were (and remain) licensed to operate under Section 104.b of the AEA. The Section 104 designation (or class of license) resulted from the fact that the DCPP construction permits were issued on April 23, 1968 (Unit 1) and December 9, 1970 (Unit 2) -

both prior to the December 1970 amendments to the AEA.

Section 104.b licenses issued prior to enactment of the 1970 amendments were generally exempt from antitrust review under Section 105 of the AEA, and therefore generally did not include antitrust license conditions.

The 1970 amendments to the AEA resulted from P.L.91-560, enacted on December 19, 1970. Congress at that time specifically amended the licensing provisions of Section 102 of the Act and recast the antitrust review provisions of Section 105.c. The AEA, as amended, requires that licenses for commercial power reactors issued after the date of the See "Petition of the Northern California Power Agency for Leave to Intervene, Conditional Request for Hearing and Suggestion that Proceeding Be Held In Abeyance,"

dated February 6, 2002 ("NCPA Petition"), at 19, 28-29; "Brief of the Northern California Power Agency on Specific Questions," dated May 10, 2002, at 18.

2 See "Petition for Leave To Intervene, Comments, Request for Deferral or, in the Alternative, Request for Hearing of the Transmission Agency of Northern California, M-S-R Public Power Agency, Modesto Irrigation District, the California Cities of Santa Clara, Redding, and Palo Alto and the Trinity Public Utility District," dated February 6, 2002 ("TANC Petition"), at 19-21; "Brief of Petitioners Transmission Agency of Northern California, M-S-R-Public Power Agency, Modesto Irrigation District, and the California Cities of Santa Clara, Redding, and Palo Alto," dated May 10, 2002, at 15, 17.

3

amendment be issued under Section 103. See AEA § 102.a; 42 U.S.C. § 2132(a). Further, the AEA, as amended, requires the Commission to conduct antitrust reviews of applications for construction permits and operating licenses issued under Section 103. See AEA § 105.c(2); 42 U.S.C. § 2135 (c)(2). Plants with Section 104.b construction permits as of December 19, 1970, such as DCPP, were generally "grandfathered" under the 1970 amendments from antitrust review. See AEA § 102.b; 42 U.S.C. § 2132(b).3 That is, the operating license applications for Section 104.b construction permit holders were not subject to antitrust review.4 Notwithstanding the Section 104.b status of the DCPP licenses, the DCPP operating licenses presently include the Stanislaus Commitments as antitrust license conditions.

The Stanislaus Commitments were added to the DCPP construction permits by the NRC, with the consent of PG&E, by amendment dated December 6, 1978.

(A copy of the NRC's amendment is provided as Exhibit 1 hereto.) These license conditions were carried forward into the DCPP operating licenses when those licenses were issued in November 1984 and August 1985. The Stanislaus Commitments derived from the Section 105 pre-licensing antitrust review However, under Section 105.c(3), Section 104.b licenses could have been subject to a Section 105 antitrust review if they were "reverse-grandfathered."

This could have occurred if any person had intervened or petitioned to intervene in the construction permit proceeding to address "antitrust considerations."

After the 1970 amendments, upon a timely written request to the Commission, such a person could have obtained a Section 105 antitrust review in connection with the operating license for the "reverse grandfathered" plant. It does not appear that DCPP fell into this category of Section 104.b licensees that were subjected to an operating license antitrust review.

Prior to the 1970 amendments, antitrust reviews were triggered only by a Commission finding of "practical value" for a class of licenses under Section 102 of the Act. Had a practical value finding been made for commercial reactors, the Commission would have begun issuing Section 103 licenses to facilities within the class and then only after a pre licensing antitrust review.

The 1970 amendments deleted the Section 102 language which had provided for the "practical value finding." The amendments substituted the current language which states, in effect, that licenses issued after the date of enactment (December 19, 1970) shall be issued under Section 103.

4

of PG&E's proposed (and later canceled) Stanislaus Nuclear Project, not from antitrust review of either the DCPP construction permit or operating license applications.

The Stanislaus Commitments were originally made by PG&E to the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") in connection with DOJ's pre-licensing antitrust review of the Stanislaus project. The commitments were made in a letter from PG&E to DOJ of April 30, 1976. The commitments provided DOJ with the basis to recommend to the Commission that no antitrust hearing would be necessary in connection with a construction permit application for the Stanislaus project. DOJ's recommendation was stated in an advice letter to the NRC dated May 5, 1976. On May 17, 1976, the NRC issued a notice of receipt of the DOJ advice letter.5 The NRC notice includes the full text of PG&E's commitment letter to DOJ, the commitments themselves, and DOJ's advice letter to the Commission. (A copy of the notice is provided as Exhibit 2 hereto.)

In connection with the Stanislaus Commitments, and as reflected in the letters included in the Commission's 1976 notice, PG&E also agreed that:

In the event that PG&E's application for a construction permit for the Stanislaus Nuclear Project Unit 1 is withdrawn, or that a construction permit for such unit is not issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission prior to July 1, 1978, PG&E is willing to have its license(s) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, amended to incorporate the commitments.6 No construction permit for the Stanislaus project was ever issued.7

Rather, consistent with the July 1, 1978 deadline set in the commitment above, on September 15, 1978, Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Receipt of Attorney General's Advice and Time for Filing Petitions to Intervene on Antitrust Matters, 41 Fed. Reg. 20,225 (May 17, 1976).

6 41 Fed. Reg. at 20,226, col. 2.

7 The history of the Stanislaus Nuclear Project is beyond the scope of the Commission's present question. Suffice it to say here, several interested parties, including NCPA, 5

the NRC -

apparently on its own initiative -

sent a letter (a copy is provided as Exhibit 3 hereto) to PG&E advising as follows:

To date a construction permit for the Stanislaus Nuclear Project Unit 1 has not been issued. Accordingly, in keeping with the above quoted Company commitment, this is to advise you that it is our present intention to amend Construction Permits CPPR-39 and CPPR-69 issued to the Company on April 23, 1968 and December 9, 1970, respectively, for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 to incorporate as conditions the Statement of Commitments appended to the Company's letter of April 30, 1976. We expect these amendments to be issued pursuant to the Commission's regulations sometime in October.8 PG&E replied on September 19, 1978, stating that it "has no objection to the amendment of the Construction Permits as proposed in your letter." 9 (A copy of PG&E's letter is provided as Exhibit 4 hereto).

The construction permit amendment discussed above ensued shortly thereafter. See Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2); Issuance of Amendment to Construction Permits, 43 Fed. Reg. 59,934 (Dec. 22, 1978).

(Exhibit 5 hereto is a copy of the notice of the amendment.)

disagreed with the DOJ recommendation that no NRC antitrust hearing was necessary in connection with the Stanislaus application and, accordingly, requested a hearing.

A licensing board was appointed to preside. The licensing board granted the petitions to intervene and requests for hearing of NCPA and others.

Pac. Gas & Elec. Co.

(Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-77-26, 5 NRC 1017 (1977). Litigation was actively pursued for several years thereafter. The licensing proceeding was eventually terminated in 1983, after PG&E's decision not to pursue the project. See Pac. Gas &

Elec. Co. (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Unit 1), LBP-83-2, 17 NRC 45 (1983) (granting PG&E's motion to withdraw its construction permit application without prejudice).

Letter, Jerome Saltzman, Chief, Antitrust and Indemnity Group, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, to John C. Morrissey, Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E, dated September 15, 1978.

Letter, John C. Morrissey, Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E, to Jerome Saltzman, Chief, Antitrust and Indemnity Group, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated September 19, 1978.

6 I.

B.

Authority to Retain Existing DCPP Antitrust Conditions In the proposed license transfer application that is the subject of this proceeding, PG&E does not propose deleting the existing antitrust license conditions. Under the proposal, those license conditions would remain in place, with new licensees designated to be jointly and severally responsible for compliance with those conditions as the successors in interest to the current licensee, PG&E.10 However, the Commission questions whether it has statutory authority to "retain or impose" antitrust conditions for nuclear plants licensed under Section 104.b of the Act. PG&E concludes that the NRC would not have the statutory authority to impose new antitrust conditions in connection with the proposed license transfer. However, PG&E concludes that the NRC does have discretionary authority to retain the previously imposed antitrust conditions for DCPP, notwithstanding that the units were licensed under Section 104.b. While neither Section 104.b nor Section 105 compels the NRC to retain the conditions (as modified to apply to new licensees), the unique circumstances of this case make such an action possible.

The Commission has previously held, upon a thorough, de novo review of the AEA and the legislative history, that the agency does not have statutory authority to conduct antitrust reviews in connection with post-operating license transfer applications. Kan. Gas &

Elec. Co. (Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit 1), CLI-99-19, 49 NRC 441, 447-59 (1999).

Therefore, in connection with such a license transfer, whether for a Section 103 or Section 104.b license, the NRC could not impose new antitrust conditions based upon a review 10 The Commission's authority to apply the license conditions to the successors was discussed in PG&E's May 10, 2002, brief in response to CLI-02-12.

Among other things, the license conditions themselves state that they apply to PG&E and its successors.

7

of the post-transfer competitive landscape. The fact that Section 104.b licensees were originally exempted from antitrust review serves only to strengthen, for this class of facilities, the Wolf Creek conclusion regarding the agency's statutory authority in the context of license transfers.

In Wolf Creek, however, the Commission recognized that even where it had no statutory authority to conduct new antitrust reviews in connection with a post-operating license transfer, it still had the authority to "consider the fate of any existing antitrust license conditions under the transferred license."

The Commission emphasized that it "plainly has continuing authority to modify or revoke its own validly imposed contentions." Wolf Creek, CLI-99-19, 49 NRC at 466 n.23 (citing Ohio Edison Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1), CLI-92-11, 36 NRC 47, 54-59 (1992)). One option the Commission suggested in Wolf Creek for the existing antitrust conditions was the option -

similar to PG&E's pending proposal -

to "modify references to licensees in the conditions when existing licensees to whom the conditions apply merge among themselves or with other entities and new corporate licenses will result."

Wolf Creek, CLI-99-19, 49 NRC at 466.

It would appear that this authority to choose to retain, modify, or even delete existing, valid antitrust conditions must exist with respect to Section 104.b licenses as well as Section 103 licenses.

An argument that the Commission does not have authority to retain existing antitrust conditions in Section 104.b licenses could be premised upon -

and would be tantamount to -

an argument that the antitrust conditions were not validly imposed in the first place, because Section 104.b licenses were not (except in certain defined situations not applicable here) subject to statutory antitrust review. However, the argument does not fit the DCPP circumstances, where PG&E specifically consented to the conditions in the context of another Section 105 antitrust review, and where the Commission duly added those conditions to 8

the DCPP licenses in accordance with NRC regulations and procedures. Moreover, PG&E is not willing to presume that these conditions -

which were added to the construction permit over 20 years ago and that have been in effect ever since -

were not "validly imposed" based on PG&E's consent.

As discussed above, the Stanislaus Commitments were not incorporated into the DCPP licenses under Section 105 authority applicable to DCPP.

The conditions were an outgrowth of the NRC's pre-licensing antitrust review of the Stanislaus project, authorized under AEA Section 105. They were incorporated into the DCPP licenses based on PG&E's agreement and DOJ's recommendation to the NRC. Certainly PG&E's consent to the antitrust conditions in 1978 conferred discretionary authority on the NRC, even if authority did not otherwise exist

-under the AEA in connection with DCPP, to adopt the antitrust license conditions. The authority to add antitrust conditions to the DCPP licenses derived from the agency's inherent discretion to adopt conditions (even if beyond the scope of existing requirements) to settle or otherwise resolve a contested matter based on the commitments of the applicant. 1" See, e.g., Metropolitan With respect to the Section 105 antitrust review of the Stanisla'is project, the AEA conferred upon the NRC broad jurisdiction to consider antitrust implications of the proposed license and to fashion remedies. Specifically, under Section 105.c(5) of the Act, the NRC (and DOJ) antitrust review must determine "whether the activities under the license would create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.... "

The scope of review is ordinarily limited by a required nexus to activities under the proposed license, but it has been held that the "proper scope of review turns upon the circumstances of each case."

La. Power & Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Generating Station, Unit 3), CLI-73-25, 6 AEC 619, 620-21 (1973).

Under Section 105.c(6) of the Act, the NRC is authorized to fashion remedies to address any findings from its Section 105.c(5) review. The Appeal Board in Alabama Power Co. (Joseph M.

Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2), ALAB-646, 13 NRC 1027, 1098-1100 (1981),

observed that the limiting phrase "activities under the license" of Section 105.c(5) is not in Section 105.c(6) governing the scope of relief and that the Commission has "wide discretion" in fashioning relief. Nonetheless, it is doubtful that this discretion under the statute would extend to imposing license conditions on the license for a facility of the applicant separate from the facility that is the subject of the pre-licensing antitrust review.

9

Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1), LBP-81-32, 14 NRC 381, 563-82 (1981)(in issuing partial initial decision on the matter of management capability to restart TMI-1, the Licensing Board relied upon a number of licensee commitments made in connection with settlement of several contested issues, making them conditions under which the plant would operate if permitted to restart), remanded on other grounds, ALAB-772, 19 NRC 1193 (1984);

affid in part, rev'd in part, and clarified, CLI-85-2, 21 NRC 282 (1985); cf. Private Fuel Storage, L.L.C. (Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation), LBP-00-6, 51 NRC 101, 121 (2000)

(board held that reasonable assurance of financial qualifications is provided by applicant commitment and associated license conditions proposed by the Staff); affd in part, rev'd in part and remanded, CLI-00-13, 52 NRC 23 (2000) (approving the use of license conditions reflecting applicant commitments as an element of applicant's showing of financial assurance).

Now, consistent with Wolf Creek, the NRC has the authority and the discretion to determine the fate of the pre-existing antitrust license conditions. As discussed in PG&E's brief of May 10, 2002, in response to CLI-02-12, the DCPP antitrust conditions would continue in place post-transfer, modified only as to the identity of the responsible licensees, at the request and again with the consent of PG&E.

At bottom, PG&E is seeking a license transfer to support its proposed Plan of Reorganization.

Its primary interest is in facilitating the necessary regulatory approvals to support that Plan. PG&E's proposal with respect to the antitrust conditions in the license transfer 10 However, the question is moot because in this case PG&E agreed to the condition in an attempt to obviate a pre-licensing antitrust hearing.

application was in furtherance of that goal, and the efficacy of the approach has been borne out by the positions to date in this proceeding taken by NCPA and TANC, the only petitioners with direct interests in the antitrust issues. However, implementation of the Plan does not depend on the NRC's agreement with PG&E's proposed approach to the antitrust license conditions. If the NRC determines that it does not have the authority, or even the discretion, under the Act to retain the conditions, the license transfer can be granted without those conditions remaining in the licenses. PG&E would continue to meet any obligations to other parties with respect to the Stanislaus Commitments so long as those obligations may exist under other agreements.1 2 12 The prior agreements include the Settlement Agreement between PG&E and NCPA of November 1991, wherein PG&E, among other things, agreed to certain procedures for implementing the Stanislaus Commitments until January 1, 2050. PG&E, NCPA, and Palo Alto have also submitted to the Bankruptcy Court a stipulation addressing how the Stanislaus Commitments will be implemented following the reorganization called for in PG&E's Plan. The rights of these parties will be unimpaired and pass through the bankruptcy unaffected, independent of the DCPP antitrust license conditions.

11

i IV.

CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Commission should find that -

in the unique circumstances presented here -

it has discretionary authority to retain the existing antitrust license conditions for DCPP. Therefore, it has the discretionary authority to adopt PG&E's proposed approach regarding assigning those conditions to appropriate successor entities.

Should the Commission conclude that it lacks the requisite authority, however, it should without the need for any further evidentiary hearings -

promptly authorize the transfer of the DCPP licenses without the antitrust license conditions.

Respectfully submitted, David A. Repka, Esq.

WINSTON & STRAWN 1400 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-3502 (202) 371-5700 William V. Manheim, Esq.

Richard F. Locke, Esq.

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 77 Beale Street, B30A San Francisco, CA 94105 ATTORNEYS FOR PACIFIC GAS &

ELECTRIC COMPANY Dated in Washington, District of Columbia This 22nd day of August 2002 12

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of:

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

(Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

) )

)

)

)

)

Docket Nos. 50-275-LT 50-323-LT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of "BRIEF OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLI-02-18" in the above captioned proceeding have been served as shown below by electronic mail, this 22nd day of August 2002. Additional service by deposit in the United States mail, first class, has also been made this same day as shown below.

Richard A. Meserve, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Nils J. Diaz, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Greta J. Dicus, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff (original + two copies) e-mail: HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov Edward McGaffigan, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Jeffrey S. Merrifield, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Lawrence J. Chandler, Esq.

Office of the General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 e-mail: ogclt@nrc.gov ljc@nrc.gov 1

Laurence G. Chaset Public Utilities Commission of the State of California 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5131 San Francisco, CA 94102 e-mail: lau@cpuc.ca.gov Gregory Heiden Public Utilities Commission of the State of California 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5024 San Francisco, CA 94102 e-mail: gxh@cpuc.ca.gov George A. Fraser, General Manager Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, CA 95678 e-mail: george@ncpa.com Steven M. Kramer Carla J. Urquhart Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP 1825 1 Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 e-mail: skramer@milbank.com curquhart@milbank.com David Effross Pubic Utilities Commission of the State of California 505 Van Ness Avenue, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 e-mail: dre@cpuc.ca.gov Robert C. McDiarmid Ben Finkelstein Lisa G. Dowden Meg Meiser Tracy E. Connor Spiegel & McDiarmid 1350 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-4798 e-mail: robert.mcdiarmid@spiegelmcd.com ben.finkelstein@spiegelmcd.com lisa.dowden@spiegelmcd.com meg.meiser@spiegelmcd.com tracy.connor@spiegelmcd.com Edwin F. Feo Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP 601 South Figueroa Street, 30th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 e-mail: efeo@milbank.com James H. Pope, Chairman Maury A. Kruth, Executive Director Transmission Agency of Northern California P.O. Box 15129 Sacramento, CA 95851-0129 2

Wallace L. Duncan, Esq.

James D. Pembroke, Esq.

Michael R. Postar, Esq.

Lisa S. Gast, Esq.

Sean M. Neal, Esq.

Peter J. Scanlon, Esq.

Derek A. Dyson, Esq.

Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer & Pembroke, P.C.

1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036-3203 e-mail: ndr@dwgp.com James C. Feider Director, Electric Department City of Redding 777 Cypress Avenue Redding, CA 96049-6071 Grant Kolling Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Palo Alto P.O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Rick Coleman, General Manager Trinity Public Utility District P.O. Box 1216 Weaverville, CA 96093-1216 Harrison Call Call Company 130 S. Cloverdale Blvd.

P.O. Box 219 Cloverdale, CA 95425 William C. Walbridge, General Manager M-S-R Public Power Agency P.O. Box 4060 Modesto, CA 95352 James H. Pope Director of Electric Utility City of Santa Clara 1500 Warburton Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95050 Roger VanHoy Assistant General Manager, Electric Resources Modesto Irrigation District P.O. Box 4060 Modesto, CA 95352 Roland D. Pfeifer, Esq.

Assistant City Attorney City of Santa Clara 1500 Warburton Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95050 Girish Balachandran Assistant Director of Utilities City of Palo Alto P.O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 3

I

Scott Steffen, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel Modesto Irrigation District P.O. Box 4060 Modesto, CA 95352 James B. Lindholm, Jr.

County Counsel for the County of San Luis Obispo County Government Center, Rm 386 San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 jlindholm@co.slo.ca.us Robert K. Temple, Esq.

2524 N. Maplewood Avenue Chicago, IL 60647 nuclaw@mindspring.com Sheldon L. Trubatch, Esq.

Law Offices of Sheldon L. Trubatch 4222 River Road, NW, #1 Washington, DC 20016 e-mail:

lawofficesofsheldontrubatch@starpower.net Brooke D. Poole, Esq.

Counsel for Pacific Gas

& Electric Company 4

270831.1

EXHIBIT 1

1. 47 I

UNITIO SlATES NUCLEAR-R EULATORY CJ.*M.geION S* -.

WASHINGTON.. O.'C. 20118

_4 OEO 0-:67 Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 Mr. John C. Morri ssey Vice President.&.General Counsel Paci.fic-Gas. &.El ect ric Copany 77 Seal e. Street San Franctsco, California 94106 ear Mr.- Morrissey.:

SUBJECT:

N4ENDMENT NOS. I -AND 4 TO CPPR-39 NiD CPPR-69 (Diablo-Canyon Nuclear Power Plant)

In your letter to the-U. S.Department of Justice (DOJ) dated April 30, 1976, you stated that-in the event a constructionpermit for-the Stanis, mus Nuclear Project was not.issued by the NRC prior. to July 1, 1979, PG&E :as

-4w-11ing to. have its 1icense(s), for tIhe Diablo Canyon Nuclear Pow.er PlanrtS, Units,.ý 1 :and :2, amended to Incorporate certain aultitrust. commitments.

This willingness Was.;contingent q

Ue o th-DOJ

vts.g-the--

N"C that-no* alit it-,"m

=eaqng. was, necsstari in conect.i on..with licensing the Stanislaus Proji::.

The l-DW -provided..suh advi-cei-nA.a letter -dated May 5,1 1976.

Since no construction permit for the S-tanislaus Project had yet been Is:.'

the NRC. staff advised PG&E, in a 1 etter dated September.15, 1978, -of i :s intention to include-the antitrust rconuitments as conditions. in the I;-i CanyonConstruction:Pemits.

PGaE responded, itn a letter dated Sepr.:r.7 L-1973,. sta.ing that it'had no objection ýto uch an amendment.

Accordingly, the Nuclear Regulatory. Co,"umission has issued Amendment ;cs.

1land 4, respectively,*to the.ProvI..-onal Construction Permit Nos.CPP.3; and CPPR,69? to provide for the addition-.of certain antitrust conditens to :the Construct~ion: Permits.

We-have determined that the.a:rmondments are.adminiistrati-ve actions.which do not alteraenvironmental-impacts descri-bed.d in thet'-Final Envlronmental Statement or create new i,,pacts not previously addressed in thie`statement. -Therefore, no environzental impact appraisal or negative decl.aration7 need be prepared.

.7 MI,14CO -7

• 1 mr-John C. MorrisseY Copies of enclosed.

forwarded

.2-o;~

6.;;

Amendment No. 1 to CPPR-39 and Amendmenft.':o.

4 to CPR er.:

AmsodencNosed i py of. a related notice which has bee.".

At o encl osed I DEo. RE:,--R for publiC atio.

to the Office of the FEDRA.%.~ L REGISTER c

p sincerely, S Roger S. Boydi D.irector Dtvision of Project VMnatemenei.

Office of Nuclear Reactor.Pegulat-.

Enclosures:

1..Amendment Nos. 1 and 4 to CPPR-39 end CPPR-69

2. FEDERAL REGISTER Nlotice.

3. EvaluatiOn Supporting Amend-ments

• ccs w/enclosures:

See next page

DEC 0- O~il7

. o c. irri-ssey cc: Ricjr1 ;. Sal:;an, Esq.,Chalruan Ato:r.k z.ety. & Licensinq Appeal:

U S. -,id:ear Regulatory Cor!vnission

• Wa:L.i*;tOrD, 0.. C.

20555 SPhiao

. Crane,. J.r., Esq.

PacifC Gals &'Electric Company 7

77 Stree San r,-.cisco, California 94106.

Jan-ice E. Kerr, Esq.

Ca!i ~ri **-?ul Ic'.Util 1ti esCom~issi on.

350

1. 1

,Iister Street Sar, r'.,"'soCaiiforntla--.1 94102 Mr. Frjerick EisSler,. President Scenic Stioreline.?reservation Cooiference, Inc.

4623:4:e ".esa Orive Santa Barbara,.Cal-ifornia. 93105 Ms.. El zabeth E. Apfelberg.

141,5; C-azadero San Luis Obispo, California Ms. Sandr-a A. Silver 1792 Cunejo 'Avenuer San Lui..3Oolispo, California VMr...Gcrdcn A.-:.S.i I ver 1792 Conejo..Avenue San.Luis Obhipo, California PaulI' C. Valentine, Esq.

321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, Calif ornia 94302 Yal-e

.I. J jones, Esq..

100 Van Ness Avenue*

1 9.h.i~r I San FrpeisCO, c

California 9

Ms. Re.ye Fleming 1746. Chorro Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 93401 93401 41.07 93401 1r. Richard Hubbard iMB Technical Associates 366 California Avenue Palo Alto, California 9 3.1 oc Dr. William E. Martin, Senior Ecologist BatteI e Memorial Institte Columbus, Ohio 43201 Mr. James 0. Schuyler,, *u ProjectS. Engineer Pacif.fc* Gas" & Electric Co.

7-7 Beale Street San. Franci sco, Cal1 forni e

-l iar.

Mr.. W, C. Gangloff Westinghouse Electric Ccr"-r-,k P. 0.-Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1522G Brent Rushforth, Esq.

Center for Law in the Public Interest 10203-.Santa Monica Boule"ard Los Angetes, California 9YS;V7 Arthur C.. Gehr, Esq.

Snel'1.& WiW 11er 3100 -Val l ey C neter.

Phoenix, Arizona 8507-3 Bruce Norton, Esq.

3216 Uorth 3rd Street Suite 202 Phoenix, Arizona. 85012 M.ichapl R...Klein, Esq.

wi lmer, Cutl er &,Pickeri..g.

1666 K Street, N'. We Washington, D. C.

20005 avid F. iFleischakero Esc.

1025 15th Street, N. W.

Sth Floor Washington, 0. C.

20006

mr. John-C. Morrissey cc: California Dep It.

of Health:

ATV4: :.Chief, Environfl-IT~taJl IRadiati~nflCbftroI U-1it RadiolOgiC 11CAlth 'Sect~iCfl 714."P Street - Room 498 Sacr~ift, aiorlan Ch'di rman,, San..-Lui~s 0biSpC) Couunty Board-of zSupervi~sorS County' Cou~rthouse Ane - R6om20 San LuIS.Obj sPo..Californlia 93401

!u., -$. Envi~ronmental P rot...~f ognc Arti: -.EIS,-_Coordi~nator Region 1ix Office 1,0 Calif orniai.'Street.

San FranCi-Sco, Calift niz 41 Mr. John Marrs MF~anaging Editor San Luis ObispooCounty Vrelegram-Tribune...

13291 johnsbn :Avenue..

'P.

0.

,.Box 1-12"930 Sani Luis Obispo, Californ~ia 940

• El~izabeth s-;.Bowers,: Chairman Atomic Safety Stlicensir2,-3 Sard Washingt~n, 0.C 05 14r.,Glenn'

0. Bri ght AtOmic-Safety & Licensir.n Board U. S.' NUclear Regulat~ory CIzjUss 0-1 Washington:,.(0. C-. 20555 T

olb6e rt Young

~. 0 BQX219 Avila Beach, Clfri 32 Dr. w. Reed JchnSOnl Atomic S af ety & Licensing.

Appeal.Board,

u. S*. Nuclear Regulatory.

Commnission Wash.nston, D. C. 20555 Al~an S. Rosenthalp Esq.

Atomic Safety & Lic wensi n

'Appeal Board U. s. nuc lear.Regulatory

.Comn1Sissflb Washingtton. D.' C..20555

K ~

~

i IJ'LER REGIULATOR COISSI

,~ ZGý:

I WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20"6S A7pfCiFC; GASAi

.CTICC.Y 2r~APLO t 1-1011or NUCLEAR POWER PLA.IT UNIT 1 DOCKET Nw 50-27

CD!t~TTOpROVSO COISTRUCTION PERMIT Amendment No.

ConstruCtiOn. Permit NO - CUP A. Te

-2.'r guatryCotrn.i ssionl (RC) having found that:

I*7~'r;J'ft to ConstrucationPermit No. CPPR.-39, -for the.pur-Pcse of~2dn nteCntuct.

Permit the antitrust

-o.-- nit

~e nt

p sU,. -:

1~

P E

lettr of April 310, P276 t-o the.Department of

• ~

~

~~

r

-J.21 co-~1~wt h tnad and requfrements ofth dl pet Ac of..S54, as amended -and the CofmiISSion's regulations M.' h-.~:

i n 10 CFR -Chapter 1; 2.T v

taflc# o-f t ahis' amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 5 1 3.. T~h' V atnc e'of this amiendm~ent-will not be inimical to the conhi~o:,.

-de ý:n a

6-? Srcw-'ity or tor the tbeal'th and s~afety of the' pub i c; a nt

4. Pric.- oublic.-notice.o'f this 'amendment is not required since the, einý:ndrent' does not involve a significanlt hazarrds consideration.

i.

-Iodigy Csr -ctJic Per.inf No. CPPR-39 is hereby amended-by

• adding

.1 tewa par~gr.aph 2. D, which reads. as follows:

Z.D.

Thi s Const*ruct Ion.Permit is subject to the following antitrust co-,.d t 1-ons:

004Deini'.ions

(~i(a~~ApI

'.at"mea~sPacific Gas and Electric Compay n

'successnrpr corporat ion, or any assignee of'this license..

(!)(b) "Service Area" means tha ar wi n'

the exterior geogra16hi.c bou~ndaries.of: the several areas -el"4tricaleiy served ýat. retai 1 now or. in thet fluture, by_ Alcant,

aid, those areas in Northern and Central' Cali-fornia a

dj acen.t thereto.

01)(0. "4lhring Entity" means a incalyrescsbi private or Dubl-ic enti-ty or la-wfuLI association there-9 oowfli r., con~tractually con~trolling~ or aperating, cr inK good faith proposin'g to own, to contrattually-dor~

or 16to -3perati facilit~fes for the Seneratt1'i, or tran's issi-nt

-t 60 ki ovol ts or-above, of electr-ric. power 41-h~~

-2Z--

which meets each oF ':he fo1no.i, crltera.

(1) i t

.s exicshi mertorop's facilities are or will be. techni-.

cally feasible of direct interconnection iith those of.Applli.cant.

9) all or part 0of its existin.

r oPrpr op o

facilities, ?.re or wil Ibe. 1ocated.withln the Service Are.;

(3itS p.-';;ry.pu,-rse for own;.ng, contractually, con

.trolling, ur,oper.tin'generatlon facilles Is to sel in the Service.Arza the power generated; and (4) it i-,

or upon c vc 4,nce 01.nt oFoperations will be, a publ:ic.

S utility rc.,lated under applicable. state law or the Federal. Pc*-mr Act, or exempted from, regulat.i on by virtue ofthe fact tha.t it is a federal, state, munlcic.

or other p)ublic enti.ty.

01)(d) "i g hbOItg Distributi-o-nSyst.em" means a financi.aly responsibleý privaite cr public entltyuricJhi.f engageCs, or in good faith prop.:ses to-engage, in the distrlbutlon :f electric pow-er at retail and.which meets each of the criteria nuubered (1),

(2),

and (4) in subparagraph (c) above.

.(I)(e)

"Costs." means all capital.expenditures, administrative, general, operatlion and maintenance expenses, taxes, depreciation and costs of capital Including a fair and reasonable return on Applicant's investment, w.,hich are proper y allocable to the particlJar service or transaction as determined-by the regulatory authority havingv.j.risdiction over the particular service or transaction.

(1)(f)

"Good.Utility Practice" means those.practices, methods.

and equipent, P

d "ig levels of reserves and pro:l"5ts for continflr.Cies., as rodified frcm time to*time, t1.t:.

are. cotanonlv used -in the Service Area toeoperate, re-;

and safely,-alect~

c pow-2r facilities to serve a utlll-'

own customers-4dependatly and economically, with due * ;

For the cotiserv-atlon of natural resources aand the prol.ec of the..environment of the Service Area, provided such

.pfractitWIs,- methods and equipment are.not unreasonably restrictive.

(l)(g)

"Firm Power" heans that power %.Thich is intended to be available to the :custcm.er at all.ties and for which, In order to achieve that degree of av~ilab!1it-, ade':.;

installed, and spinning reserves and sufficieCttranSt to move such power and reserves to the load, center are provided.

(2)

Interc~onnection.

Interconnection. agrteements. nfl hte ' :

li1cense conditons shabeijC.tOU lC.

• prg'rap

(ýat) through ()

.(2-)(t). Appl icant shall iuseunIeacal C!Yrefuseter.L.

• nd-prite omall in p ar a-l1.61 i t h arvy 1-no~v Ent ity-, o-r to. inrterccnnect vi t anOy 1.10 Uhhor ing Liv bitt-on S$ystem...

Such -inittrtoflnOct iofls sho,1 be -v

-.e (2.)(b) Inter~c.60pect-ion.h b

-si

0o0ift, uhil~ess Other, Jar~eedb th

,f ta~n. int~erctevtin 16n agr~..e::

• te 44netl'f __ao

-not:be T Iicifd t o 1c'r -vc.

whnhihr lot eare preferb61 fro f the sta~.

Aofý~n Goo UtAtyrct y

and t

c k

ore av

~

.fro

~.2 e

Ap~licantmay. inci-de i n anyneCfhOCir gf.

provisions. that: a Ieighborifl En-tity or, N

~e rhb orl r Distr'ibution :Sys t'e*m.malfhtial inth e power factor SSZ:-e.

vit 1t load, at_ a c, llpavabl-elo ieveltoth' mai~ntaVi bpplicant A.n the same-geogrPh iC area' and use c--,: r~e coh:trdl-methods Lto-achiiiv -this-objecti*'e (2(c Iterconnectio aement hall ýnot pr o.v Id'e for ro~

extensi1ve. f acfl.Jt'es or-control eqipriet-a t the p'.-I of.inte~r connection, thap are requir~ed by Gcoid U%.i -4i>.

Patice unless the-parties mu'tually agrie thatF- :i.

cirC~gnstariceS-wiarrant 'special. facilities or e qu i P:7.z!:

(2.)(,d)

TJhe Costsý.Qf aIto al.ac ilitie eurdt r.~

seric a ~e~pontofi~t;ecnetOf 11,l be ?I: '.

on-the bUsis'of. th' rb~ected :~C-ncma-ii bvene'.i ts f-3 party ro~m, thfnteron~etikfor. a'fterz cons, Llerv.ti.

• ..-n vari o.S transact~ions %or-wh`Ich 'the intdrco~nnectior, faciltes are ýt~o be ýused, un. ess: Otherviis e t r.4-6 b, the pa rties.

(2)(e) ~~griren Ansshal I noti'pseit.;r upon th, ts treceo apacity. a. d vn e rcv stolde *r

,exchaniged upnder ý`the, -agreemen& 'except..as.miay be. ree-1/2 by, Go~dd-11t 1ity Pract ice-

-4 (2()Anlnter TlflCti n aavrecO t Ofl l" not prohibit any.

pary -

Io enteri~ng. in#o oh,,,, !i.irconnfect ion agrcevro!":

but -may 'provide t'hat k2 Appl ~ct:-: recPeive i

e

-notice of: any addi~tiOr~l inter~l:CllO1-r.i:

~fl others, (Zthe.Par-tis jointic 3

4..Tider and agree. uce.-n

~~~~~%o adiioa

otatw

rv Z S frea~sures-, or equip.~f..,

"whch. nay, be reuiG yGood ci.i tY Prac'ic as ~~:s

-of,- thie -new,arrap:ýe'tft~ Z n d' (Z) pic A;~c t na.y tter-mna..

th necnnection agriaanent the rel bity of ItS

.syStef 1 or ser vi ce, to, its tut:.+/-Sw4lb desl.

- affectedý by sch dTOnal.

(2),(-g Aplcant* May i nclude.ProVi1silOlS i-n an i htecoonfeCti on.,

re~iue r r(quirin a% ~'e~bOif En itor g1bot

-Distrlbutl~ ~

~~

IV Sy~lte to deeo'wthiP. car.

odii nitte-d progra9mýflcT6 &-h di r:a nd -t: e s4eparati'on...

Oile Sich rogJrentS.ti at hl equitably share 'the int'erru-ptibn or. cuta-i I r.ent: df customer -1o d (3)

Reserve Corordination.

-n erco nn,.ctioft Agre!I ft nej i

It.ed o u rsua n 6 to -th~es liene onit

-1tsh.Jl be0 subjct to the following.

paa

-ahs (a) throughi ().re,,rd i ng" reserve coordinati^f

((a Appl icant and any f'ehborlflg 1nit.ity with -which-it trt.r~-'

connects -shall Jonly e~ttbll-ih. aniselpa-4,ttely ma in tt.:7

'the ti~n~

res-erves toa be in~st~e or ot-w1epo~

uner-n nercnein a gre'etv Unes tkieitwse-.

mut~uall*y-greed tporeere shall be ereseS.'

Plercenta9 o4 es: ae fir fl

~i ia an -temiý't

~.~~rv~pe'cetaeshl be At icast. eqtw t pjkaV

.2 plann red s~erve.,perete2g w tiU.

the. in te rcoflflfttI*

'.A*

NOghbori lEt-ty h a 1-not :.'e. requi re

6opov,

e.

reserves f. r. tWVý t portio f~ its -ioad..whi~c~h-it..-

woeets.

thouh uchse f-irnPowe.

While dif-fe P rent re's.'r agements, no -party to an in terc nnection: ag~roteehff.

shallbe rquird, to. provide a, greatv-e reservprel~~.

givetn inPteronetio aranete, r

innde cre`ýasged b rý

~-

mybe reuie ta r

ntl orrv roidt additona prs' Int etful monet of sut Inrareicraedb r-

(3) (b) Appi i~cart and 'Ne ighbrori n g En t it ii it i n tr connects. sha 11 j o int Iy. e~sltab Ii?4 S

the mtnimt.-I.spiffiflc reserves evr" 4

r interconnectiofl agree-:!,_-nt.

n1~

n ;Ohew G

agreed upoi,. spinntnb resevs~A be a

1~~

Cs e

-a

• ~~

a petrcentnc~e of pe'ak.lcad. and L -*

n!:

1.;!

!~

percent-age shell be a, last c:i

~of:

's s pi reev enftagp w hot,~~ thae:

I CC, oil A

j:Z Enti1ty ;s s-,i 1:l. not-be required to-,'rnvide Srnrri~l re3r for;ta prtlion of its "load* tvhiAc-: I. mneets-thaounIh

'purchases. of -Fi r~n?notWr.

h-i IJ cdIT" ren't s;::,ninflfg e I.per~eintaýeis may be specified i~,arioiisiflteruafrirec agreeme~nts,. no party,-to,,an -intcr-c':I-nnectiofl ;reez'int hllbe. requ~ired -to:"roflde-a ~rae prigreserve, perce *nt'age the -n tha -wIT

. Appli-4..Pi" nrovieids., excepf Vfthe tiotal spinning' reserVes p-ent~s pol' malntafnsse eibjt eq'~ito that nx i sth~ng. Wiit ha.

a.:gi~ven interconnect, jo rag tae c.~~-

y rea son. -of. the. new-a rralJr~geent

• tfhn the othcr pArty or prartles -may be rcequiroL to. provhie, anditio,;3i spinnin;,

reserves in tmoul ;iunt -f su'ch incrc,,:3.

(3)c) pplcan shlloferto tell, on~ reaslonah't teizvis ar-J.

.co~~ti~l5, iclu.i0g specified Pericd, raciyt

..#i-ghbori~ng.Entitry for. use.:as r(.1ete'S -if' Suchm-cePacci~

nel'ther :'needed for Applic-ant' s otwn systc!

nr tier~t3t.

cofmuitted to otherts iand -it' thc.ihori Er,

-i wi.1 offer.to-sel~l,. on reLsoablono

$.e tcrrd and.col-1.ons5,-.&S

ýown such capacity to. Applic'ant:.

(3)-(d)

Applicat' ýmay j1ncl Ude in a~n~y ierccnnfect co acree,.w:;t

.Provi sionsz requilrilgM` a - e ghborii E-ntit

-cvrper's.

App icant.for any res

-ves;ApiatvkS~db

-the result of ta fJalueo sc mai nta in

-all or: an4kp-?..rt of ýtie r~e Si~t*has a 01 r

to provide in* said intdrc-nnec'tici -agreeimonf (1)(e), Applicant shl 1ffr to -coordina-.-e mraii'terancý'- _~*~

• wi th - eiighborig Enlte intercc~nnectd i' A

anid to eychunge 'cr s c 11 main6te nane. c apac ity a~- ensi-t!ý when such capac ity., an~d 'nerg aravib and -i t

• • raoaetodso in..accordarice w-th G a d Uilit Practice.

(4)

Emergency Power Applicant shall sell emergency Powr to any ntercor.:.

Neighboring Entity which maintains the levelof mini' reserve _.agreed upon with Appl icant, agrees to usedu, di:fl-gence-to correct the emergency, and agrees tO se.

emergency power to-Applicant..

Applicant shall engaP such-transactions if and when capacifty and energy for such transactions are a-vatl.able frorn other-sources,

.t

.only

.:.to the. eXtent: that it can do so without.ihpa-ris':.

serviceto Applicanits retail or wholesal.e power cus,'.

or impairing Its abilitv to discharge prior coftllire.-t.-er!.

(5)

Other Power Exchanges

• Should Applicant.-have on ifi.le, or..hereafter file, w Federal Power Coailssion,.agreem, ent;5 or rate schedule:-.

providing for the: saleand purchase of short-term':-'c-, "

and enery, limited-term capacity and energy,. Iong-e'.

capacity and oenerg.yr economy energy., Applicant shel

• on a fair and equitable basis,. enter-into like or.st,:;:.*.

agreements with.anyNeghborHng Entity, when such for:x.

of capacity and energy -are avalliable,recognlzing the" past experienCe, dtffereft economic conditions and Soc:*

-Utility. Practice may justify different-rates, terms a-:

conditions.. Applicant :shallrspnd. pron:ptly.tto nq.i.*

o 0f -Nei -ghbor-ing Entities"cofc rerfllflg the availab-ilitty 0"'

such forms of capactty and.-.energy from it's system.i (6)

Whol.esale Power Sales Upon request, Applicant shall offer tosell finr, ful partial requirements power for.a specifted period t' c interconnected ieighbori.fg Entity or Neighboring is".

.buti.on.System under a contract.with reasonaflle terms condit ions. t'cluding provisions which Cpermit APP.jic,.

recover. jts Costs,..Such whleiale. power sales.nus't cons:istent with-, od Utility Practice.

Applicant. s,.

not be requi -red, to. sell. Firm Power at wholesale if i~t not. have available sufficient.generation or transmissi to supply.:the, requested.service-or if the sale would..:.

service to its retailustomers or its ability~to dis.

prior commitments.

.I

-7 (7)

Transmisslion Services (7)(a) Applicant shall transmit power pursuaiint to i, agreements, with provIsions

-hich are apprO-,

t requested-transaction and Iwhich are censisti-r license conditions.

Exccpt as listed helow, s.

rv-shall be provided.(I) between two or a;;liong.:r--_;

Neighboring Entities or sections of - Neighc.'.

system which are geographically sep raLed, c:t!'.

now or in the future,"Appl icant is

(..)

between a Neighboring Entitywith which, now or-.'

c future, it is interconnected and one or nwore

.::-a,*7 Distribution Systems with which, now or in tI. -I-*..ri it is connected and -(3) between any t:eightworim:;

r'itv SNeighboring Distribution System(s) and the A:"t point of direct interconnect.ion with any other

-*i.tri" I

system engaging -in bulk power supply outstde tl..

i-"

electrically served at retail by'Applicant, t.:::: ;:,;:;,

not be required by this Section to trarinit*f p

a hydroelectric facility the: ownersi'p of hicl-z i.nvoluntarily transferred from Applicant or (2) f:--4; Neighboring.Entity for sale to any-electric systui I c t 11 outside. the exterior geographic..boundaries of t sl v si.;'e-"

areas then.electrically served. at retail by Apliie.¶.n, i other Neighboring Entity, Neighboring Distri-tut.C:c

v. 1.

or.Applicant wishes to purchase, such pbwer-at i^

pricelfor use within said areas.

Any Neighberint E'ti*.y Neighboring Distribution System(s) requesting service shall give reasonable advance nctice to.

of its schedule and requirements.. Applicant shall no*t ý'e requiredby this Section to provide trans-is kr t arv;CCe If the proposed transaction would be inconsistent "'.:t""

Good Utlity Pract-ice or if the necessdry tran.,y:im facilities are committed at the time of the.req.-:.t A..

fully-loaded during the period for whi:ch service is r=Z-"'.I...

or have been previously reserved by Appli.carst '1*-7!--~

• purposes, Iloop' fl ow,.or other uses consi tternt w!'G Utility Practice; providcd, that with respect t6 t!he Northwest-Southwest. Intertle, Applicant shall not Ue.

a-.

by this Section to provide the requested tran sisstcn s:"

if It would impair Applicant's own use of this faci.,.&-.

consistent with the Bonneville Project Act, (50

7.

August.20, 1937.), Pacific Northwest Foi;er 'ark~t'n (78 Stat. 756, August 31, 1964) and the Public ;

c Appropriations Act, 1965 (78 Stat. 6L*2, August.?O. l]`-..

(7)(b)- Applicant.-,1 0l i ncIud e i n i ts' p apnin~g -and c~nstcucti~nl progra%.-

~u,:h incre ses. in -its transmi~ssion capacity or s

uch -a d d itfl al tranr.Misioh~f facilitieS, as may.be reqUIre for, the tirr-sacatlofs referýred,-to in..paragraph '(a) of -thi s

.Section, '.-rnvided anhy. v',ighborifl rntl-ty-or.Nei-ghboeri.g is'%tr i b vt (" Sy st e~i ~ie.plC8l ufcetadvance lot i ce. ý-

be -necessary to ac~con~ododte its requireiienits f

rom -a

-rag-.J tory. and technical standpObft and provided furthe

-tiihe

.e~nti~t reusti-ng transmission servicCkS coipe~nsaes Applicant for. the Cos~ts. incurred'as a resuil.tw..

o0.f the re'quesi." 'Whe're transmissiOn. capac~ity will be Increased: oir adiditi~onal trAnsmi-ssion! fail-ities will'be.

In~stat Go pr de or.

.1aifitrain-threqueStid service tb a Iieighboring Entity or. Neighb'oriigflgDis~ttlbUt'iOfl Sys'te.,

APIli-calle "'.

requi re, in addi.tion:.t-o' 8 ate. for-ts~e of.

other' fcirzi ie that Vanetf Costs 41ssociated -witti1the.

'icrsd aaI ty oaddi.ti-onal facflitfesý shg. be -made by te pti i~nacodance. fit ah:nd

-inadvarice of -theifr respect. -'use of the new~capbcity or f.liltieS.

(T)

(c) Nothiog i oer i.f shallI require: Appl icant (1 to construct addl t ionalI tra nsri~ss icen facilities if the construction of..

such facilities is inconsi~steflt w~ith. Go~dd!tility PractIce or ifi suc-h faciliti-es-could be, constructed without duplicating ayportion of -Applicant's ýtrasisflYt, (2) to provide.

t-'rar snip.is Zi.6if se.rv.i~ce. to.- aretall1 customer or. (3)

-to consZCUt uct

• ~e tnsfSinotsete "'area then electric-ally* served -.

at retail ' by.Applicanit.

Q(7 d) pa-te -s;!e-,u1es and aegreements-for transmissioQn services provided u.Od~er. thiis Sect 1onýshalIl'-,be f ilIed* by Applcn i~

theýreg~l atery, a.ge ncy having juirisdiction over-such rates and,.agreewtnts.

()

Access. to Nvc :Or ;eneration (8)(a) If a' raj qtibor Ii-ig En.ti-ty or-1Nei~ghboring Distribto System. raa.Lkes a. timely, request *to A001licant.f or'-an owner

.ship participatio-n.

Vinte. Stanislaus -Nuclear -Project-,

Uni t, Mo.- Ic r.an6y f uture. nuclear-gererati~ng unit. for wftci' Appliaf IpplI*Os. fol-r a construction -perts duIng: the 2Uyer ero immedia tely following 'the -date.of" the',

ýcons.truction pe4rmnit for* StAnisla!#uSUnit rno.

1,l. Appl Icant' shall ffrheeqeting -party 'an oppor~tunity, to partl ci.pate i 1 suc~h units, up to an am~ount reasonable in lgI I-

7 9

f th a r-ti C'i pant.s.

Wi 4,11 of the r el at i vel oods o

e. P.

Sta Islitis-.Unit. No.. I or. any future nuc r

unit, -a. requeist. -for. part iti.Vat ion be-4ermt;!.'

if recei ved w.ithý-tn-'90 'd f t 'r the ma i I i rig by.

to Neiýhbortng Ehtities and -11.*Jghbbri 6g, Di str-:)*U':-6 on -F, of an announ;&.4nt. of it-t-,:inteAt to c.ons t tuct t !ile' j nli,.

and a-request f-or a n, e x pre 4 si o, n of inl-Lw-est. in Parti.ci'at shall be on..-aý*ýbastis,-r.hich:toroper!,,t.1-es AppTicant for. a reasonW6 shir*O Of a 1.1 : i ts, ý'osts, I i nf!-.

and to.

n p an' At fw.

be incurred, i I ni'ng, on -a d' OpArattng tbi-ý f act] i ty*

8)(b) An) i ng E nt'.,

-or ý.any

.-Nd'i _gfibbý

-i ty N i§hborin§.Distrfl_%-..M0r.

'A SY ttem. ma y reques fior, Pi.eti.-Idt-Pati-On. il tj 1;

1.

6. 4

e.

nuc ka -u

-0 n

e r, iV.- o., :sslpe

1.

able-t

-a-f; al or

-agre er

. -honc S-hA r P, o f if-.iiik Uttd -z*tt h pa rf un.i.t Iftdtssac a. IiA.-tiosmi tstwi raCA11104k, Ui 11 e, S3 7 otherwi Y

hbdrtng Ent I Zy:. 0.

so' A Wica-ht i.Heig ed b - -p

.-gre Y

esirin ution System, or _c.pat Ne i ghbor-i-ng. Di trib d

i G.:

m a r u

id su&-ah a*

emet

--i s.t haveý*sigýd nt wi th n, one p.

a Applicant.1fi-0 fhat,- Hie. iv.hbori-ng. 'Ent 1 ty or Nei ghbori n9---.wst-r1bu;U on, ý Sys t em..pert ilitn't fW.-iciu-1 anJ technical. dita.-beariiig-6n.,thO:,*fe4sýtbýi-lft-y of thi,. proj.ecz.

ni a4atl ppli

t.

-ApplAcan't s4a which 4're.'the

-abl-* to -A

_cAn provide add iftfient.d4tl as-. they-,,ý'becc-,;;-ava -1 fn-q'the'ýyi

_e reqL A

rty thil-I Pef, 0

ýdur, ear Th 14SV ft,9 Pa.

Appl-ican 1 expein'ses in.currad b

't-forthWithAhe Sdd-i.,,tioh6 Applica.tý i -n., ma k i n s6ch ff6ancial 'an'&-technical d; a t 4 ava"Abli; in any-part i t i ýit I on agrtlement subject tri h1i may-require.:ProvJsiorS.-r -iO

%sr

'Sect i omi.`_ýAp-p-ill eq. I r' 1,;

pawpent -by' each 0articipant--of, fts.-share.of all costs

ý-'&P'_ to-,the---d'

-oVthe_ý-a9r*ee.men't.j reqtd t. i ng pa t thereift' t ay ata shar,ýý 00,

ýpartici n er o p-jtsý prur 0.,'..they--.are.4xpe-r4ed vs s 'arfi rejulriný, L-ach of. units-iM-relatid fac-ilili d'

i part.i;cip4ntto.i4 e.iuchfi.-naincial arrano'ements at; n: a y necetsary -to:'ens,-ure. -the, ab I I i t Of tho'. ýOart. ic I 1):Int to conti"'KC-e td oiiko-_ý ýuch 0 C.S.

(9Y Impleiientatibn

9) hargos, tems-,And;-p*raCt* itlp*.s a*re: and tha 1:1

(

(a) Alll'raiisý,

be subjOct-to theý..acceptance. and approvaVof njv-T;4gt,11 tory 'agencies -or courts haming Jurisdiction 6v4ýr the"i.

• • ..* x

" * * - a...... :

(9)(b) Nothing contained herein shall enlarge any rights ofa Neighboring Entity or Neighboring oistribution System to provide services to retail customers of Applicant beyond the rights they have under state or federal law.

(9)(c)

Mothing in these license conditions shall be construed as a waiver by:Applicant of its rights to contest the.

application of any commitment herein to. a particular factual situation.

(9)(d) These license conditions do not. preclude Applicant frcmi applying to any.appropriate forum to.seek such changes in these conditions as may at the. time be appropriate. In accqrdance.with:the then-ex5ts.ing law and -ood Utility

-Practice.:

(9)(e)

These-.icense.condit-ions do not require Applicant tot become a common carrier.

This amendment is effective as of the da.e

• ." Issuance.

FQ.R.THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO.MISSION

.Divislon..of Project Xanagemen+-l-Off Ice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Date of Issuance: DEC 0- 6

.C.

I

- 10o

,¢ "NUCLEAR REGULATORY 06MISSION WDAMINGTOt4. 0. C. UM55 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC' CO,?.*ANY (DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2).

DOCKET-NO.

50-323 AMENOMENT TO PROVISI O1NAL CONSTRUCT I ON PERMIT Amendment No. 4 Construction Permit ro. CPPR-G.

A.

The Nuclea Regjujatory Commission: (NRC) having found that:

I The. 4mendment tb.Co'nstruction Permit No.. CPPR.690 'f.1 thG purpWe of -ocl 1i aq.v.. tihe C.nstructi onPermit the antitrust coilttmerts "stattd !n P.G&E's.letterlof Apr 1 30, 1976-to the Depart~ment. o1f Jt.

l 1ies with the stahdards and requir.elYents of.-thkAa.t1c Energy. Actof-1954.-'as ýamended, and the Commissjon'S regulio set forth in 10CFRChaptet"

2.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 5,;

3.

The issuance of thi s amehdment. will not be inimical, to. the cori~cn defense and securlty:.or to the health eand.safety-.of the pubic; and

4.

POr'ior :public-notice -of thits amendlment. Is noti required si ace the anendment does not involve'a signtificanAt hazards cornsideration.

B.

AccorldinglY, Construction -Permit N6. CPPR-.69 I s--hereby -amended by adding,a new paragraph 2.0. Wthich :reads as follows:

2.04 This Construction Permit i's subJect to the fOll.owing antitrust conditions:"

.(I)

Definitions (1) (b)

".Applitcantm means Pacific Gas and Electric.Company, any.

sucesso`r corporation:, or any assignee.of this license.

Servce Area" means that-area within t~he exterior.

geographic.boundqaries of the several areas electricallY

.served at: retail, noW or fn the future,-by Appli cant, and those a&reas-inNorthern and :CentralY.lCal ifornia.'

adjacent thereto.--

I)(c)

W "Neighboring Entity" means a financially responsible private or public entity or lawful association therec,,

So~ni.ng, contractually controlling or operating, or irn good faith proposing to own, to contractially cotrol or..o operate facilities for the generation, or tr:anii mission-at 60 kilovolts or above, of electrrtc pc-;-.

70=4014c Z7r1

_w-i;"..,.-...

-W

which '*i e ts ev-_N of the follOwin§_crterla:

(1) its existin)g or pr..po~fsd facilities *are or will be techni cally feasible of direct interconneCtlong with those of Applicant; (2) all or pa'rt of its existing or provosed facilities *a:

or. will be located-ithin the Service ore; (3) its prim)ary purpose for owning, contractually con trolling., or o erating generation facilities is-to sell in the. Servic.J Area the pov.r.ge1erated and (4) it is, or upon co,":eflCt2UIent of operations ll be, a public utility regulated under-applicable state law or the Federal Power ct, or, exe:npted Jfrro, regul ati on by virtue of the fact that it isla federal, state, munlclpa.l or otsher public entity.

(1)(d)

"Neighbori ng Distribution Systems means a fi nanci ally responsible. private or public entity which engages, or In.good faith proposes to. engage, in the distribution of electric power at retail and which meats.eac.h of the criteria -numberedI (),

i(), and (4) in subparagraph (c) above.

(l) (e)

"Costs" means al1 capital expenditures, administrative, general, operation and maintenance expenseS, tayes, depreciation and costs of capital' including a fair and.

reasonable return on Applicant's investment, which are properly allcI0t0e-tO the particular service or transaction as determined. bý the regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the particular service or transaction.

(1)(f)

"Good Utility Practice"j.eans those practices, methcds and equipment, including levels of reserves and provisions:

for contingenfcies,as modified froin time to time, that are co.-aqonly usedin the.Se rvice Area to operate, re iaaly and saflely, elecuric power facilities to serve a utility s own.customers..dependably and econtoically, with due retard for the conservatIon of natural resources and the preter.t-on of the environrut.tof the Service Area, provided such practiccs, niethcds and equipment are not unreasonably*

Srestrictive.,

(l)(g)

FirmPower".rmeans that power which is intended to be available to the custoier at all t-lres and for which, in order to achieve that degree of availability, ad e.u1e i nstalled and spinning reserves and sufficient transmits4 on to mnove such power. and reserves to -the load center are provided.

-3 (2)

Interconnection Interconnection -agreements negotiated pursuanit.to these license conditions shall be subject to. the followi:ng paragraphs (a) through (g):.

(2)(a)

Applicant shall not unreasonably refuse to interconnec and operate -normally in parallel with -any Neighborin Entity, or to interconnect with any Neighboring Di~tri button System. :Such interconniections shall be.consistent with Good Utility Practice.

• (2)(b) In.terconnection shallI be atone point unless otherwise agree-by the.partisto an Iinterconnection agree Interconnection-shallIno.t be limited to Iower volt'ges.

when. higher vo-l~taSes are preferabl-e from the standpoa. t Sof eod: Ut~ lity, Practice,and are avail~able from Applic,:,.

Appliicant: may Include in, any lnterconnection agreement provisions that.a NeighboringEnti-ty or t4ofghboring Distribution System maintain the power factor associated withkits load at a comparable leve,. to that naintained'

"`

by. AppoI cant in.the same geograph*c area and use co nparable

.control methods: to achieve this objective.

(2)(c) :Interconnectio,. agireements-Shall notf.provid.e for*more extensive facilites"or control" eqofpment at the poi.nt of interconnecti on :than are required by Good. Utility Prlactice'unless.-the pirties mutually agree that-partict'aar

..circumstances warrant special factiflities or.equ-ilpcent.

(2).(d)

The* Costs of..additional fac-ilities required to provide service at t-he poi6nt,.f 9interconnectI1n shall be.alloc;..

osthe ba-sis :of the projected economic benef'its.r eac party, from the interconneCtibno-after.consileration of t.Ie vari-ou's. transactions for whtch the interconnection-.

faciliti-es are to be Used., unless otherwise agreed by:

S

. the parties.

(2)(r' An i nt eirconnection agreement shall not impose I.ation.

upon the use or resale of. capacity:.and energy sold rcr exchanged.under the-agreement except as may be requi-ied by Good.Utility Practice.

MIA 7

-4 (2)(f) An interconnection a'ritsholl not prohibit any party. from erte,-ing i:,to other.. interconnection agreements, but may-.proviide that (1) Appicant receive adequate notice of ally efditic-i.7 intercr-iinectlOn arrangement with others, (2) the partis joint,,ly-cosider and agree upon additional Jctractul Iovisiors,-itcasures, or equipM..et, which may be required

a.

Good 3ti)ity. Practice asa resui t of the inew arrangame"!t4 end (3) Arp-icant,8Y terminate the iýntercc iaCtiOn

.ent i f the rellability OF its systemlor service to its custci:ers would be dversely.

t affected by such additional inttrciioner.tion arrangement.

(2)(g)

Applicant may include-provisionfs in an interconnection.

agreement requi ri-ng, a Neighboring "ftity or f.eighborin Distribution SSytemto "develop with Applica.nt a:ccordi nated progra:Iifor underfreouefcy load. shedding and tie separation4. Under such programs, the parties. shall equitably share the interruptiona o-curtailment 'of customer load.

(3)

Reserve Coordination

'Interconnection agreeents negotiated pursuant to these lI cense conditions shalI be subject to the following paragraphs (a) through ('-,) regarding reserve coordi.nation:

(3)(a)

Applicant and.any ?4eirhborlng E.ntity with which it inter connects..shall jointly establish and.separatel.y maintain.

the minimum reserves to be installed or otherwise tirovide.J under an interconnectirzn agre-o.'ent.

Unless otherwise mutually agreed upOn-reserves s!-all be -expressed as.-a percentage-of estimated firm peak load and the ininimtM..

reserve percentage shalI be at least equal to Applicant'S pl anned reserve percentae.wi t*)out the interconnection.

A R~ei glboring Intity s!%.I not be required to provide reserves for thlat portion of its load which it.liDee.s through purchases Of'"Firi Power.

-hiIe different resprve percentages -,inY be specified in varloijs interconnection agreements, no" Prty.-to an interconnection agreement shall-be. required to.' provide a :greater reserve percentage than NApplicant' s planred- -reserve perce-ntage, except that if the total'.reserves Applicant 1

iust.p-ovide.to inaintai'n.

system reliability equal to that.exist ;ng withotut a given Interconnection arrange,:lent are increased by reason of the new arrangement, then the other party or parties may be required.to install or -provide additional reserves in the full amount of su*ch increase.

(3)(b)

Appl.icant -and-Ne ighbori ng nt it ies. w-it jTc it ~i.r connects shall.J`6oitly eStablish-and..sep.,ra~tel y~a

.,the minimun spinnifig reserv e s to. be.Pr*C':i2d.Ie,C~

interconnection agreement, Unless. 0.

agreed,upon, spi'nning, reserves. shall_ be ex:,resseot:.

a, per~centage -of pe'ak load. and:the. ifi!~. ~ff~

pericentag shall 'be ati!tast-equal to 0-0iCal~ ~.

reserve percentage' without the iritercon-:ýtlof.

A Entity'shall not-be. required to po-vide'spininglr1r:,~

for -thatpOortion ýofý! Isload which.-iLrects thrctaý.2 purhass o Fim ower. -Wh tIle. d~f f erer~t.,spiflnnWi - -V pecetagesimsy' be: spelcifi ed 'in var-ious itr"iC:Cn agr~eemen6t~s,.no.p~arty-to an shal b~

equied-t proide a

get-pr opi:1ei'J percentage. tha th, whc APP.l icantpoiesex fthe total +spinn1,ing re erves, Apl-~i ~spriý'~~

Jitalnt flYte reliabM.:lty equal tozthz+ -e x s.

"Iri c -~

a given - ntercontnectfion -arrangem~nt are-iiicreascc ~

reason. of. the.. newlairrangenment, then the other. party:, ýcr partie~s may.- be rquired to provide additional spi~i reserves in the f ull-amount of sudib incre.ase.

(3):(c)

(3))

.Apolcn s'hal'l offrt sell, on riiasbnable termns an-i c'ondItIons,, includISiAS spcified. Perli's1, cap~acity Zt a

• Nigh~orng:nttyf~ u$-asresrveifsuch Cap;.;CJ.YIs

.wneitheýrnetded fo

~cnt

~

yst-ent no-r co~r.-tr 1y commiftted tooI otL;-aI rs. 'ad if the. tiei 6hbo r Ir E nt i ty v otfferlto.sell, on-re a.s.01nable.termsýa~nd+.+Co~nhit..iQ:Is, iLS own -such cpcity to A~pp:icant..

Applicant ma y.

l'niCluWi-i any Interc-onnlecticinare;.

Provisons requiri*ng -:-Neighboring Entity Io crJ~

Appl icant: for*.any retervesý Ap-pl icant m-1 iss avail."lIe 1.tty re~sult o.f "the fa4 e os such EIih~r n t itty t mai nta in a41 o any pr ftersre thsa:2 to-provide-in said in t,tconnecttofl agrec-ii.r.t..

• (3(e) ppl ant halloffr-to c0ordirnate mai:-tanaflcC. SC~

withý:Neighboring; Entitie~s, interconnect,+e-'d wih Appl.icm and to 'xchange-.,r setlImainftenfant~e-chpcity. ard C rlu r!

when: siuch capacitya...nd:energyýarer aviai~a~.~adit reasonable 0o doAs 1,acconfaiice withGo tlt

Practice,

-6 (4)

Emrergency. Power App)licant shall sell eI ergeflcy PO~er to a~nyI Irtercofl Neihorng Enity which. taintaifls th.e level

Tfi reserve agreed upon. I-ith. Applitavit, agrees tCO t:et d

.iltgence to correct the emergencyr rand agreILs LOse eeenypertoAppliCIant Applicant s-hall -,II

.such transactions. if and when-capacity and, Prier-_Y fro.,

such-transactionS -are avaiilable from; Other sOIC,

-only to the. extent that it.

can. do. s0 without iqoairieý serceto. Applicn' retail orwoesl O2 or I arng its Iach bil-,-ty. to dIshirge -PMrio COI~T!OL..

(5)tOther`P.ower. Exchanges Sh-oul`d-Applicantr have on f ileIt or heeafter'fil, wi' F-ed~oarl. Powter C-omini6114on&qreemWI~s or rate ~~ue provIdi'ng for th ae dpu rchas of hr-.tenn ca;.

• and energy,, 1lnt d-.terlfl capacity edeeg, c.t capaicity and. energy+,o~r-econo' ener*gy-, Applicant% shaU

.. oi arand: equitt~blt +ai, ente Into like,)r s ir

• geeMents with rainy~elighbd~r.lO8--Eft.i~ty, when such for.

0f -capacit~y-and' enrgf*y Iareaýtv-ail1abl~e, recogrn.izing thi?;

pOast ex eo~n.periene d iffOeet onN c nditionS. nd Gt;.**

Utilty ractice. mayý Jtfy_ dif Went raes tirm1 S;V Con~on ns.-

1pplicnt-Sh-I respond promtyt of---Weigqhboring Enils concerning0 1h av~aiity such :forms. of"capaCit an.eegJrom its. system.n

.(6)

Whiolesa 1e Power. S aIe~s.

Upon request, -AOpli icanh+t' sha 1-offer -to sel f I m, ful~

partIial. rei~u te.rent $lt:

power. f or a-speci fied pc r,

• -t.

Z.:

ineconnecited 1-Ierj'ghbor~if.g Eniy or g:ihbori ri D; st' btiion r-Sys-te ndraOtrCwihreasonabl! e'IS coonditons. inc O'~:hrTWig.

provion whi'h 'ermit Ai'li~lican' recov.er-i~ts..Cost's,ý.' Sch w~hole'sale.pqu.er sales ~i:ust t cons is~tent. "ith Good*UiiyPrcie Applicz2n~ !5,-'.

not :be.-requ ired tosl rIm. Powve r at wh'Oesz-le f itC not. have avai lable. sfici flt, g.ene'ration or ti M ssiSz

-to: supply.the 'e*quested 'service or..if 'tht sale woulld ir:.

service.tO+1 its..retaifl customiiers or its-fblt o~iv pr'ior cofluiiUren. s..

() TransmiiSSiOfl Services

!(Nfi) AGpptlcant shall transmit powerp-orsuant to interconnelction'.:

aree:-.e nt s w i th *prov is ions Whlicl-a re appropriate to Vt.0 requested transaction end iwhlch a re.. cons i stiet with.Ch~es licel-se~conditlonis-Except as'listed ýbelow, suc srice shall be provided. (1) between tto or ainmrethan t%..a neighborinlg 'Entities. or-sections-of.a Reighboring Enz:.iy s sys~tetev whi~ch are geograp-h~itallY separated, -with which,*

• Vow

'or. in the future, Applicant is interconnfected~ (2.)

betwetn a -Neighboriqo. Entity *tith.whIchj., now or I n the f uuri It is.tnterconntected aivd one or mOre. kei~boriflg Di stirbut i~onl:-Syst6fs. wlt~b.whlth:9. ntowi or. in h

.0

future,

• It is ~~~~~~~~~connected, andX)eteeryNegbin Ett o NLJiShboiritnt &Utrljbujtifon Systemt(),.and. the Appi icait S

• ~~~

oit

f. irect. Interco 'nedt.iot with, any, other eeti Systemn: -enga~gingnbl power sui u

Pp outsid the6 area then electricailly. served 'atreilbiplWt Apict al 7nolt Ibe:.ei rd.

totransi poer o1 rcr ah d olcri faIlt heoersh-W ef which has been nin~olwtarily tansere fr4C ppicat or (2.). fror.a, Neighiboring Ent ity for.-sale toý any" lectric. system~loated' outs idelthe. exteri or:gegahcbona So the, several..

tra the~nelfctriclCll seved. atret a il by AppiC~

fay:

o-thr 1eghb fig Ewtty, ?eghb"rT A

Di.stribiutlofi SystE~

orAppTic-4n-_'iLes -

oprchaSe' su.'

poWer at an, equi'viei~tt

• price for. use w~itti nsI=

areas.

Aye1hboriflg~fiYP Iteighbri A.-g DistributAion' System(s)e reietng tran uusm s.resn servie salgver-easofla:1e -advance, not ice,to Aplian ofisshtl n equlremtst

'.Appticant shall not e requ~ired. by th it Seto toprvde tranSmlssibnl erv, i~f:the* proposed trinisactionw-otfldý be t consi-iSte.nt' withi Good:Uliy Practic i the'ncS~ tnsissi 'on facilities are cO ivtt~da,-t thei-tfme of the. requed t. toC'.

a....

full-lade-d d tri4 thepro o~hc serv-ic is 'reoueste.'

• rha.ve beeh. previ ouslTy reserved' by, Applifca'n f orer~

puroeS lOopp f low.

rterss con itnt wit G

Utilty ractiice;. prov Ided, thatwih re$P#C-t: -to teP~bi Uorthwes,-S tWest Int'ertie, Ablctsail -not be.rez44-r~4

-by ýthis Seton, to -proidMe -the -reques.t ted tra nwSMJSlon ric' ff.AiwidlDt~PC~'sw use-ofwi~~

t-his faci'ity con istnt with the'- Bmneij AL Act t,(01Sat071 A gut'20, 193.7),. Pacififc. '~rtbwest 'Power Xariketing c (ta-Statt. 756, August 31, 1964) -and t-he -PublI IIc. Works

• Appropriations Ac t 1965.(18 Stat..682, August 30, 1964).



(7)(c) tioth',,ing heir.ein.:shall1 require.-Applic ant 1 to construjC&

additina trasnsissi on-f ac~ilie if thi&sut~ o such facilities is inconsitstent w~ith.oo Utliy"rctc

or 'if such -faclte cor hos~tructed withbut-dJUA1Icat.ft any,..rtioof.Applicat'hts-trns (2). tn.

.9r.vd trasmS~onsevi~t aretail customer or (3)- to const ruc

.transmi~o usd the Area then 6.1 trically served V:.

2 ret-il by AppVi ca rt (7).(d)

Rate S chedulIes, a nd agreemeni~ts for transmission services Provided under:ti Sec

ýbs tion -shall'.be' f iled by Appl icant u 4.t t the. regulatory. a.Sency'.havin'g jurisdiCtion over Suchi rates and. a:greecmflts.

(84 Access-to Nuclear Gene'ration' (8(a

,f

.a.

IReighboriflg' Enti ty. or M e.

Z hbor1ng9Distributicti.

System;ivrakes a tine."y request tc.AppliJcalt. for an oumnor ship part ici~pat-ion inteStanis'lau~s 10tc !,ear Pr~oject, Uh Uit N~O. I' or' any future nuclear generafting uni t for w-i~ir AfppT~cant-.apple fo osrci..of pemi~it dur.ing. the 20c-..)ear pro jMrediat.y~lO il the+ date. of the constuction permi f~~

AflI~

Uit No1 Appiat

• shall offer the :requ~estjing par~ty, an opportunty to part'.

cipate ¶n such units, up to an amourt teasonable inI I :i-t Q7)(b). Ap pi.:ant shallI i ncltae i n its. Plawinni ng-and cOflSttuctiOPX

• ro r m sch ncrease's-in its, trans~!iq SOls

' ca.-ac ICi Y. or such addit~ional transmissio fact iisa iyb e~~

for. the-transactions "eferred-to in paragriaph (a) of :Hs Sec ti or, pro'vide. d a~ny Neighbori-n g.I Ent~ity or Neighborfrig9 9jD~is

-3btijoniSystem'gi9ve Applicant.suffic)ient adVcnce notice as may'be necess;*ryt.o-accolm,w-Odate its require;.ent S e*m

.f a regulatorY anid:technical st.andpo-int *adpro'Iidea fr~her that1-Ahe enti4ty requestI ng.r,ffiSiolrlc.

comi4en-iates Applifl a

or the: Costs.incurred as a rsl of t hd request.

1Where trans.'lss~iofl capacity willI be.

.i~ncreased.

or.aoddit.i~ofal. trýan smn-is sioffticiIi titles willI be' insttal Ied-ýto provide-o servicehth eqe~o to

• a KeN hbori fig Ent i ty' or' NMi-.g.hI ib~ri, 'gtstribution:Systen.,

A0.0-tc*,ntImay. reqi'itre,. iný addit6W to a' rate. f or u~se 's.

other aCliiS.:tý pa$'mert of -Costs-assoc iated,ith h' jnc. Ued capcty Irdid a fciti esshall1 be, q.ade

-by the. partites i n accordan"ce' with and Vin advance* of the~ir re speet Iv'e -use of t~he newv capacity-or faci-lities.

-9

• of the reeitive I cii-s of tho.-

arttcpants. Wi th rtspect, to Stanisleass U1,11% !:." ot.:yfuture nuclear geflerpt!:.

• unit, a request, for f -t1C i

i on Shal.edend ie:'

if -received wi18th1-Or* *!ys a",er tthe sialigbyApc:

to Wih-r g'Ef e

and !:ci ht:cr ino 0 Ds tr ibujt i VI.5 9f an afnncur, em~ent1 cfis intent..to construct. the unft and a request for Jn expressi-on of-interest in partdcipa~icn.

Participation shal ! -ti on. a basjs ithich cv.npensates Aplcnt for a:rs~

shivre of all 'it's. CoAs-s., In ru

• an to be ircurre;, in.planni~ng, selecting,a site for constructing. And ope~rating the -fac~ity...

(8)(b) Any* Neighbioring..n..

o any tNeighborlng, Dittributicn Sy~s~em~naki t

a ti61y request.0 fo atcpton

+i.n. a nuclear, un1It MUSt. -car 4nto. a egailly bind-ing And enforce abe agree;en to-~ ~

efnnlltIOl1i~~~

t shre.o t~i Costs+ associatedwtiatCPtf nh uni~t and-.essociatee, trarn:1is'2iS~ofl facilIite~s.

Uh le~ss otherwise agreed 6Gy pi~caant, a 'Neidhboriflg Entity or N.fe1g~hbori 9 D~istribu.i J

yr e destrinlg-partlicpatlon mu st -have signed such an~a agre.ent Within, orne yjar. after

~~Applian hsProv4~e otht;ehori.-ng Entity or Neighboring Distribution, System pertinen financial, and

• .te~chnical data, bearing on tr~e f easib.Ili1ty. of the-project whi~ch.a

-re Ithen ayalVb~

-opp1 an.t. Applicant shall prov~ide addt& na ;mrinl dal, a!; they, becoa'.e aviae Au ur ing t.he,_year r The: reu Ing pigrty ý0halI pay to Applicant f orthwlti titýhe adtoa expensesIrredy ARpTicant in nakR9g su inancial and techni~cal date

-available. In any.-Part,"CipAtion agrediteflt subject to

• ~~

tiSectionApplicant-May require provi'sions requi~r-s pyentb each :particifpant ofishref a l co6t inAcurroed up ote efate cr. the agroefiert:, reqy. ring each tpartici~pant, the~reaf tee Ito pay-i is+ pro raa. s.tare of fdi it they Jrie expended'-1cr. the p. arinltng and corist ructF11 w

• of. uiitts and-related fa; f.ties

-a-ad -requir ingf ah" aricpaitt coaaeke such 41 am ia I arrangsernt s.

as. mm_!

Z

ýnecessary a-enuet bi-li-ty Oil the -participaht to co~tinuze -to make +such payýents.

(9)Zplsuemntati8o-&n.

(9()A". raeS, chags re2 an rcices are and shall.

be subject tpothe acceptance-and-appro-val of any regu!~

tory agencies or courts hav4.ng. j ur:sdict ion. ove r.66 th e:

6 (9)(b). Nothing contained herein sha1 ell r p -Y rlgth~ c Neighbori~ng.EhtA~tY or Neighboring DiSIribu?.iofln:

.to provide services to reltaii cus~totrers..af Apf

beyond.-the right-s they have. under stiote or federial 1-#

(

9)(c). 1Uothing, in.

these license conditi*0flS sh.,1.

• as a-waiver by Applicant of At r.;tst appli cat ion of spy ca-Witse,. t herein to a.

factual. situation.

1(904).d (9)e*)

b e 'c 0. t r-.

Contest>

pa-rti c'J

,The'se 1I-cense..cpndiltOns do not precl'ude.-APpi icarnt ra a.pplying*:to: any i-pproortate forum to seek sUch Cil.;Z i-n t-xhese 'cond ittions. as MY at the' tim -

be-ppropri'a.

i

.6 odane with k.the' then-existing la w af Good.Lti iy Practce..:w Thee icns cnditions-do -not -requ ire ApplcatO bec'omew a coeuldn: carrier..

C.' Th is irne-ndment'i's effective as':of.the.

d.ate of issuance.

Ion kE.

KtUCLEAR RtEGULATGRY CC'~I

• ~

u'er S.BoydDi rector

-Divtion of Project Managemeit'

• • Office of Nuclear Reactor Regti at 1Oo1

'aeOf I ssuance:

E06'1 Date SM 0--6: Va

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATICKY clX?.G.1 S S;?

DOCKET NOS.. 025AD~-2 PAC I FIC GAS` AND ELETRIC

.C6?ANY (Diablo Ca..nyon Nuclear Power Plant,

-hIfts I and 2)

• NOTICE 0,1,ISsOACE OF AM4END-ME;T TO.

MST7UCTIC, A?::~

The US.Nuclear Regulatory Coimmision. (,flC) bas i s u e d.

n~~

and 4, resPect tvely.*, to 'Cons-tru4tion Permit,.o. CPR~edCPR9 ud to the -Pacific -Gas. andý Ellectric-Company for DiboCay' ucltt

'v

~.

Pliant, nt n 2, loaedi11n~d Obispoq County, Californie.

The-iimeindpr.ts roVde.

-for, the-additionw of crtain antut d

i~s.

Th 011 Canyo wla Poer Plnta not: subject'. to ai`n attrs

1.

~

i under Section-.lSC: of the Atomnic E hergy. Act,, as amended.

'eore raecer.

zi~

power pOlants aesUbject, to suck reiew.

Howgever, in cormnection i t~:

u.e NRCs roedin9S, on ýthe -Stan isla ucear PPjet Pcific:Gas amn d Zlectrýic C..an agee to i nclude ant ttrust' Coutiet as cniosin 0h~~ai Canyon-l'icenses: in certain circumst'ances "which have occurred.

In a l

, etter to the U.4 S. De0pitrt. t of-Justicei:

l(O),

d~ed Aorl

J 1976 PGE sttedhat r he eent-a cosruCtion. per m.t for

'.?e

s s2 Nuclear Proit

.Was -not isse.by*ieNC ro o Juy, 78PE:.a will ing to _have -its lce~nse s) for thfe D!a bl o -C~anyo.0n NotcI ar Power PTr-_s, Unis 1and.2,, Amnded-to icoprte eti ani-trustco,,c it,,ents.

Thism w~lunS.as, coningenmt Ito th Wavsn he r*t*C tha't" n C airtI truit hearing ws. neesry. init co0n t act 1o n.it W

ieI~i 4~

e:r~

Project.,- The DW.provided Such advicie i~n a letter dated.Vay 5,195

Since-no construction perait *for the Stan! slAus Project-had yet been, i ssqed, the IIRC staff advised PG&E...in a letter daited September 15, 19783, of its intention to include-the antirs co~tet s conditinsi the'Diablo Canyon Construction Permits.' PG&E respneI.ltrdte September J9, 1978, stating that it had -no obj*ect ion to such' an amer4:Tent.16 The amn..et opywith the standards and requiremients.f th 'Ato';i ic En ergy'Act of.,1954,. as amended -(theAct). an h oiission's :regulations.

The. staffhAas. made appropri-ate-fihdi'ngs-as. required by the Act and the ICuu snsrgaiosi 10 CR ter'I, -which, are set-forth in the

.amendment.

• In-accordance with 10 C FR -50.91T, -prior-'public notice of these -amendmerts was not required :si-nce the amendments do-not involve 'significant haz.wvds cniderati.fis..

The. staloff hs determninedý tha the is~su htante of thes~e amendments will not resuil-t in any significant _envi~ronmental impact and "hat pursuant to.

• lO-CR Seton55d) a*-environmental impact sltatement, or negative declaration,. and environmnental-impact. appraisal :need not, -be prepared in.

connectiton 'with, issuance dfthes i-eamedoefts.

-orfurther det'ail s Wiith'.respect to'thi actinse()lter related to, the amiendm'ents dated.ApriIl 20,. 197.6,- May -5, 19 76, September -15.,

1978, and Se~te.r.ber -19, '1978, (2)

Amndthent: Nos.. 1 and 4 to CPP-39-an'd CPR.49'" respect ively, and Cj3) sta.ff' reae vla~n ofa r~e1~

to Inclutdi' Ant itrust Conditirons in*

the Di~ab~loCan'yon Constructio4n. P e.i

1.S

-All-o f these i teats and Qther related mate.rial..

are *,a';llb Ie for public

'inspection at the Conmmission s Public,06cum-ent R~cr-.:':,

i I17.H :t r-et,

.iashington, 0.C. and at the Local PublTic Do cum en. ~r locatt&! in San uzi s Obispo County-Free Library, P. 0.

1o0' Sn s ~~spo1 Clfr189U

-A copy of items (1), *(2),; and ()mybe'obteirl.e'Iupofl wr~tteon 'request-'

• to the U. So. Nuclear Regul atory -Commission6,,-.Washinr-gci~i, 0. C. 205551, ATTN:

Director, 7Divis~ion ofPoetMng nt,.Off ic%

ofl Nuclear Reactc Regul-ation.

Datd at etsdaryland, this' day of

,J.L197Is.

FOR. THE N ULER EGULATOR Y C0,MISS QhnF'..Stol~z, Chief-'

-ght.Water Reactors. Branch INo.. 1 Divsio ofPrject ;4anagefient

TYALUATI-OM OF A"::

TO I S CL UOE ANTITRUST. CONOIT~$SI!{f 2.CO P ER 141T S FO0R THE DIABLO CANYD"

'TCLA I' 1PAT u~TS 1 A N'D 2 The *Paci-fic tas -and Electric. COO.TandY c~ Cnt ruLcti on-permits OPR-39 and CPPR-49.'for Uni-ts.1 -anid 2?

respec-t-.?y of thie !Ylablo Canyon *Zucle!.'

Power.: Plant..

The constrctktion--permit f or t-~i J, C 11:1", -e s ir.s Led on April1 23,

98. -No _amendvments to CPR3 ov

U sly Dean i ssued.. It was Ia Stp bi-ife bya re

'~ c e 1 3, l i;'ý :ejctehding t I latest defr coo let~ of on structt~ion..-.

sh cintr J"

hl' rlt: fo r --Ur.i t 2,vi, 16.'-,

onecem-bor'9,.19_70*.'

The lat~nninettC~-69 was ;1 ed'

~e ae ugust 14, 1974.

.,.1 was 48 t tobdfified by. an -Oedfier *on. C

~~13. 17:&extending the latest date for c 6k~ti ow Const ucik

'Th Dia

~ Cyon._Ruclear Poi r Plant s~ 1ot su vbject+ to an, antitrust:

rev. ev under-Se 0tion, 105C odf -thle Atomi

s g Act, as a'.mende, -a gre reetncear

'ow' Olant~s.-a~ -- Ub.4jct ;0 S9u1ch Heiw

.Koe.er, in oft..c:lotlvthte t Rsrodeddi lSs o0 the Starnislaus Nuclear Project,,

Paietfic Gas and El ectri c Comnp~

ag9ret:

to incd rnt~itrust commitments

• sý COp.

,ln te-

~

oay~~~~1 in~certaifl circumstances ichý hati,,ccurred.

Ow ltter. to th

.s.oea~

of Jur:.tlce (1 J) daited: Ap ril1 30, 1975, PG Stisate~d that, ln;,he :eveqli a cons..r;.thf ;ntt for theSailu Wucea Poetws ii ts'issed by the r

or oj-ly 13 1078, PG~Era willntOh~e'tFliene~) orthe.bcCycNular Po.wer'Plants,

'Un its I1. an

_-'aiended to incorporat wai atitrust.codu'P.t'eflts.

~~j5 illinnesswas. contýingent u disn te.tR: ht oan; trust.hain a

feesr ir A~lCi

.ih t

icenlsiflg the Stanislauzs Project.- The OOJ DWpro~vided such 1ýdvice -a letter0 dated m'ay 59,1976.

• Si~nce no odns~truction-permit -13r

-i~Pric hdyt beein fssued.,

t1

ý IR taf -adv-is XGSE, irn a l.etter datid Spebr 5 93 6f fits. inent-io tol inclujde:' -*e anti~tru-.c_ iton sl conditions in.

t.e "Diablo.,Canh`yoo Constructiutn Re'r m its.,

PG'&t responded, 4n.a. l etter d a t a Seoltember 19,1978, statig~ It-had' rA cbjectintsuha ndre.

PO

o L", S.A.jo 1 *0'.' 40UC-42 SJP;_-mo'j xn;

!

f*ýr S-!`:'-7-Td

.4 iv. d.0 P844041nv 8 nc-Usepue D. "!C' POOAP S.4 3TSd M4 'SZu" 4

_%1:10.3ul S 1-u uawe.;oaouens.S.1.

Ou WJQ-33v P.

spj jo a:olenssL 4 1, PIP, ý-n i I PauUO3,-V+' pajedaAd o.q; 10 Pow L-01eidOe i:ýPjl

. ý P.

I

,..- -.., i 4ow'. 6 1 -'0' 't 1)

Al 0 ov.,turnsind,..;pap.,%+,-(bu='Se.q.

-- 43. 1. 1 011 1, -.:-,

UOLGOMS Qq!

r.1.0.1 A,

-.:tOU S.*22dwt --DU Z.1 044..u.'.

lou14abp 411:

1

-4 4:aZ L-0 J. % e ars'.1 WO ulp'-Sý! 1ý4

1MqPU8Wl 4 4 4, 04 2.

Japis 141 C'A'16 X.

S S V CS24` U4021Ms L:7j aqj: U! Msojp es ;),rW,'.':,uoXue3.

L pe:

ld",-JamOd U11 ooiujida.id PU;?

-4 3 04 lsv 0 3 `44 T.P.11 e m

i 1, uO 10 J.^

IS, A[Z tA a_ jo;'jjUqWSS&

0, Sze S.S ZVO WPU S;r" q-a6f.4_

u!

Suopliapi-spoo.

pail ou P a 1.7 9(jaw"!, E-qj-4. 4:

u, sqj, fiu-tato Ituo:3" pu e.83p

-?U L A VA-84 S:j.p;S INN 0431 1L

-ZP"41 01"'SU0141.

w-ZI-Ve pp?. P. Paau v Sý 4JNý A:J 4.-.,;;

Lit u.p. I vnelsp ok; SS OA -U; Al-';ýW S-1 ativ. *S444

.4s 'S'W WPU

-1124-pa p I pt.-Do C:

OS041 JOA NO P.42" Md uaap.,j4q,+ paq:D aj pf

-4.0 jC Lidwp. sý*;W'J; uaaq. se u. vq:L al; E80401 ISU+03 843'

0. :I-A Pe S4ýý` OPýAOJd

.10 Cal-1: PWP -.4 0 Ila A? uf 3 U.1

-uv woij out S T-PZ:

11.aj se.4 roo-9,4 od e4s Isuipue

iJds Z! -'S !U6M)LQLe attl '104"' SOPPl-3 63 PUP-j*jj#w' 4 4' r

-LADJ St-

• SuW*4'PU0ý: S-V 1M..:.OE. L-'IJd 40J84-48:1.

.4%

P41 04 WOW

'40d AvOlOnN

?15d :.L

R1 D' ePn

-Ja

.4 i d 944. pus woik.-ýSanlbw V12. 01 -.379d s 0 ut, 1..84 4 -SJOIDeJ. 9S844 VO,:PaSv9 it-it oA low

EXHIBIT 2

NOTICES NUCLEAR REGULATO COMMISSION NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER I issuance of Amendment to F'CH Notice Is hereby given that th clear Regulatory CommisiOn mission), has; issued 'Amendmi to Facility operating License

46. Issued to the Nebraska Dsiict (the licensee)-, whc Technical Specfflcatlos for for the Cooper Nuclear Stati (th located In Nonal-A Cou~nty..

The amendment Is effective as of Issuance Ibia amendment revises the peclnecatlws for the facility the caliration of intermiedi neutron monitors ýon anm in range monic n <dicator ram lieu of indicator range sofle I

.The application for the 6cmplies with the standards ax menta of the Atomic Energy A as amended (the Act), and th sion's rules and regulations.

mission has made appropiate required by the Act,,an th ion's -rules and regulations Chapter X whichAme I

. license, amendment.

ror pvu

of this. amebdment -was no since the amendment does no significant hazards considetl Sth

• rneeof this amendm*

resut in any Wmtfcgnt en impact and. that pursuant

• 51.5(d)(4) -azi enTvrIOGM

. ment, neatire-decla" tion mental - impact appraisml In prepared, in connection ',ith janee of this amendment.,, -.

--jorj urther detail with rev action.",: sm. (1): --the " A P amendment dated March 10 Amedment No. 23 to License

46. and (3) the.Commissl Srently -ssued SafetyWEVauAt thaite=ms are aalabWlr

"- specton ;"at _.th e -

H DO.

n* lt.R~o zl -

-7' -St

.-'ubtas 683. I Is 13tmh

';dr obtained a

D..20565.Atteftio Dirtt

-o lityd-tetrm 3IX7 RY tDocket No. 10-3-33 POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF.

. FACIF

• NEW YORK AND) toAGARA 1ý W

Receipt a "T.,OWEr CORPk Tinmft

.VISTCT

" t OP onA ftLkcnse 2

-OP.

ting~ctS mlec eU.S.Nu Notice 13

• given that the U.S. ant to se uthe'Co-Nuclear neuak omsin (the Act of I1 ent No. 23 Comel-ssion. has Issued Amendment No.

vice frc No. D)pR-17 to Facility Opeating Lcense NO.

United blc Power 4DPR-59 Issued to the Poer Authority of.bf which

h revissed the State of New York and the Niagara.

'ny

)e lonof Mohawk Power Corporation whc re-f~cted hI e facility) vised the Technical. SpecIfiCatci f or to sectk Nlebrask.

operation of the James A. FitzPatrick "RIlles o Of Its date 'Nuclear Power" Plant. located In Oswego -a petito Cotmty. New York. The amendment Is quest a "Techn*i*a effective within 30 days of Its date of of the a:

-to permit Iss~uwe, Interven ate range The amendm'ent changes the Techni-be filed termediate cal "Specificsations to specify lower lin-delivery

• 0 scale in Its for the reactor coolant water conduc-ice Secti 0 only.

tlvty and chloride Ion cop-entation.

Ington.

anendmeut The application for the amendment 'addr-es d require-complies with the standards and requlre-ulatory ct of 29e4.

menta of the Atomic Eclrvy Act of 1954.

20555, A' e commis-as amended (the Act), and the Commns-ton....

The *Cor-slon*& rules and regulations. The Com-Fo; T findings as mison has made aLp priate fings as F

ror..

,*uncmis-reqphred by the Act and the Coa-sios ft 10 (

sions ruke andregulatlons in 10 CFR C

rth--in-the Chapter 1. which are-set lorth in the bl notice license amendment Prior public noUct tArequired a ths amendment was not required t ivolve a sin the amendment does not nIv-de a o.sinlf t hazards coatioeratox.

F.rAl that:

The Commsion has determined that nt will not the jissun-e of this amendrment will not Lronmentet rsult in any significant environmental to 10 CPR impact and thatpurstult to 10 C youh ital state-151.5(d)(4) an environmental state-the pro.

K environ-mentý. neg*Uat declaration or environ-vnmnl eed Dot be mental Iact p

sl need not be tion wit the bssu-" preped in connection with issuance of Xctrte this endment,.

Nute)~

The' tecto o Iw For further detalls with respect to this aviý*

catioc. for action, see (2) application for amend-clear Is 1976, (2)" ient submitted by leter dated January has bee NO. DP--- 27. 1296, (2) Amendment No, 27. to LI-w-T0

%*a conctr-cene No. D1Plt-U,. and t3) the Comn-ermani Aon:

al on te Safety Evaluation. A e "an pu ~ of hs via o public In-Cmi a' -pubilic smtCion-a thk5 Cmi~sslon*& Public by f-GA ree. N.W.

-1.,.,-717 Street. N.W.a*

n-Wahl*lon D.CI.."

at the wego Northe Cti ty A

1 Second Street, a aitual (2

we 4

the Mie rq~ad- -,A opitj Ztý 2)ý ýarld i0) may be lkl me Huckear otained

.4requet additlined to the

&tion.

rashnstn..J.S Nuclear RegulatMr Commiaskin.. antitrt ci* DtiTWM Washhwtnti, k).C 2058. Attention: D1-Mhendo

,v,1 s:;,

,.I tins Reactos noder sh Dated at b d-aryland. this I" ment day-of~

-p 11 Departi th swka /ft%"ors trict Co

/VtoamyW.

Pas, That

'-..aacf SClkkf.

OziEýCUIjLtrotm when-.

Zacke *5reafloA t

applies

-rth i teactor*s.

m liat 31411, L 41, NO, %-.-MONDAY.

MAY IT. 1 976 Q mQ

.[Docket No. P-54--A]

IC.-GAS AND F1ECWMIC CO AttorneY GbnerdI's Advice and'4 r Filing of Petltkk To, Intervene trust Matters

=rzisýorl 'has rec~ived: pursu

,tibo 205c of the Atonpc Energy

• C as amendia, a letter of ad Attorney Oeneral of the tates. dated May 5, 1978. a copy is attached as Appendix "A".

erson whose interest may be af tykjirocidlng may. pursuant

= -2.114 of the Commlssion's t Practice." 10 CFR Part 2. file n for leive to intervene and re hearing on tae antitrust aspects ppllcation. Petitions for leave to e and reqitezta for hearing shall by June to. 1976. either (1) by to the RC*,Docketing and Serv on at 171*1H Xtreet. N.W.. Waslh D.C. or t2) by mail"or telegram d to the Secretary. Nuclear Reg Commission. Washington. D.C.

TTN: Docketing and Service Sem he Nuclear Ren)Iatory Comnit.s jIROMXZS ALTZMAN.

hirle.

Antitrust and'Indemnittf Group. Nuclear Reactor Rec ulation.

A~srTNOI'/ A

.LAXS NtLL'U% "WICIM.

UNI NO I

IDocket No. P-464"AI live Mqýeted our %deke pursuant to iswns of Section 10*c of the Atonmic Act of ilk4. as antended. ir connec i1 the application of PlCI C OGS atid company to cotttrnict the Stanintlaus Project, Unit no. 1..

lepartment haA prvIttumly rendered a IlwceM ApplirtUiea for several Iu.

cillUie with repect to which I' n an applicant.

ihe brat of the" X's 19l7 applitiaon toe a license to et the then propoeeed Mendocino rPow t, Units I and 2. On Augimt 2. 1972.

suntemt infowmed Tour *rvdece*nr Ilon that certain deecribed. onduct

-'to lortcloee the.derelbpmenlt of lt. bulk power supply 6ources Ln1 a and Central California had created Lion irlnonsistent with the antitrup-t d that conatruiction and operation or adocino Plant by

-O&" appekr-ed Maintain such antitiompetittve mitu Aemodingly. we reoommend that an it hearing be bold with reapect to the nao application. Sub"quent to the g of that advic*. PO&IK withdrew the ino applioation beause of environ and mfety problems. Tiiereafter. the ieat c*tntnened a oomprehealve In.

ion ilodee Itht antltrst Jaw. with a pomlble &nUtrnut tlon In Inthe dla urt.

Inieetiotiot was nefrlng completion Mu reque@ted our adyvie on POG&Xa tion. to participate in qbe San Joaquin, MWvoet (pom(p). Vn X40O~bern 24..

& dvised The Cocuainalofl?1f oonne*o' iii W"N that, in the periodl sincet out!

• -: 2O_&

"NOTICES 1272 advice letter. it 'appeared that PO&E licensitg of the unlt. In the event that of the'foUlw;l*K criteria:

(1)

Its exiting may have modIned certal*z of I antlcom-Po&Ers application for a construction per-or proposed facilities ar or will be tech petUtlt pra-cie which were the basi for mit for the StArnllaus Nuclear Project Unit nically feasible of -4trect interconnection our earlier recommendation that a hearing be I is withdrawn. or that a construction per-with thoe of Apptlcahit; (2) all or part of held. As we stated In, that letter. 'Whither mit for such unIt" Is not isued by the Its existing or proposed facilitiea are or will the actions by Po&i ham been idf

• that N*uclear Riegulatory* CommiLslon prior to be located within the Service Area: (3) its

% altuation inconsistent with the antitrust July 1. 1278. PO&E Is willing to have its primDrT purjP for owning. contraCtually laws no longer euxiMt and/or whether an ant-lice*se (s) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power controlllng. or operating generation facill trust proceeding-on Unted States.triCk plant. Units I and 2. amended to Incor-tie. Is to sell In the Service Area the power Court should be LtItit3ted are matters which pors*te the commitments.

generated: and (4)

It Is. or upon. com amr currently being considered and which As a result of It review of l pCE!s acUtj.

mencement of-operationa will be. a public

• will shortly be resolved. We Indicated that, tis th Dearmn

-b indcted that In utility reguilat-ed under applicable state law because the Department would shortly render cluslon of commitments in the Stanslus or the rederal Power Act, or txenwpted frorz defntitive anti trusadvic on PG"& In con-license is neesr to r e-eya ant-c-regulation by Tirtue of the fact that It is nectionf with the also'pendlng -opZ 0

sppl:-

e federal, state. munlclpal or other public ncatloDfor a wicee alo stur the Stan petl've situation which it belevm to exist.

caUson for a Met a CO I ' We believe that none o O

AU "ntlty slaus Nuclear Projet "

In view Of ZP dIL-1m been or will be Inconsistent with the D.

• ".Velgbortrng Dlrtributlon System-"

agreement to certMfn Itrmlted license condi-sa financiy responsible privte or tionpertaing to NP. no hearing would v

lat no c t

te

n.

public entity which engams, or In good fith t~n pertaining voi ol.rl*wldwew that no conditions to the Stanislus ooe ton h

dsrulno be neeessaXrelrL connectlon with Cthe lieseaeneesaerowsr.i rdrt proposes to engage, in the distribution of beno-lteSPe are

-neces-.

w-e'.

In order to electric power at retail and which meets each trg

.oloUwPng the ssua'c* of the S3NP TdvIC - a ro e

ugaon we a'e gi-b of the criteria numbered (1), (2). and (4) In letter, the Departnient and PG&E entered to the incuslon of o tr attached conditions subparagriaph S above.

Into discusss r-garding anitrust concern i
.in the license. We understand that the D E. -Costs-" rmens e

all eapital expenditures.

whinoisch sswe nsbeliev din antitposed by ncern pertinent will adv-ise the Nuler eglaor ad, istrlatIi-C. Vencisi. ppertin and iasin Commiion that these com'dlUtis, wnicn tenane expersesA Jaxes..depreciation% Ad tivities affecting alternative, bulk. power t~

enn~

~

ew~

U e at

,c*o

,pt*

n*~

g*tU m

e*n Ply souM lit Northern and Centrlll Call-have been negotiated between. the

~ePart-costs of xapital 12Tluding a fair and resaon

pourne, On ebrUary 19.1276. March 22.19M ment and P w

reedY te 2tutlo able return on AppUcxnt's Invtment. which an Arn* l O

197.P 9,

Mith

22.

• _tent wfh

.the anutirust laws which are properly allocable to the particular serv s&dAprle eu0ete thelrwith

-5ouf

• the Department Pu:%Tt tO e

e=t, ice or transaction a, determined by the regu fence, requested the Commission to &fford W

eonz hti h

tonyGn "sddltional time for the Attorney General to --

We recognize that if the Attorney 0en-t thorlty having jurbodiction over the render advye on the StansI lal5 Ucense Ap-erl advL-eas the Nuclear Re9ulatory COM' particular srvice or trosact-on.

pication In order that discussrios between that th-nt appth-P. "Ooo Utility Practice" meos those pc&Z and the Department might continue.

P'te license condi*tons for the S tanlsus practileta rethods and *qulpment, inolud-.

We-ae nowd blhe to Worm the Conmise-Nulear Prok*tý s

a would mn'am ing levels-of regere and-provsilons Xor con sien that PG&E and, the Department ham-only that broader license OM410A _arno tingencteS as modlfted from time tb time, td agreement ona SttemDentof Con -

eemed neces0ary In the context of ti that are commzonly used In the Servioe Are'

,I-tments which the Department believes iproceeding-Accord3y. the In-to operate. rsltaly and safely, electro 'power will obviate the Anti-trust problems posed,-- eltion in the commitnts of limited ex-faciltUes tW serve a utility's own customers by 0&E5 ctiites nd hih wllremdyceptions to PG7&Es general Commitment to depen~dabil and economnically, with due re bte su activo inesa.wt c

wit l t

mhe

, transmit power In' o way exTe to P gurd for the consterrstion of natural resources trust laws Wh* c we believe has existed In-. fr-m any legl requtresnt It iay I

and the protection ot the environment of the w Iofthern and Central California. Tbe State-4'une tttsoMta eto pGt Service Area. provided suchi practices, rneth Ment o Commitments, Is contained *n*the - transmit power In cit mtances where such odf and equipment Ie not.unreasonably re

• attached letter,to. the. Department, the mintmenta.

f O. *7Ur Power" neans that p6wer which "Ipo&zprestdentcohn?. Bonnero IMts Pest-.

We understand that asouMd MX refuse i, Intended to be available to the 4kustomer at po&E denles that any Of Its poUiCIM-OPra'--In the future 'to transmit power I C'rimn aLUtlmzns and for whIch, In order-to achieve tic"s. hai r-been or-will.be Incossmtt stancs e

the cor-tent d

n.t r-that degree of avaslabilMty, adequate Installed the antitrtst tawsranm Bowel'.

tr an qew r

res.

an. s lent trams have these Commiten~ts Included AN reI

.seresg the right to bring 30gki scuou in iioto omscpweanrery o

tions to its license to construct thesail

',an ~ propritate fumotherthan-the Nuclar

)oad center are providked.

Suclear Project;.-hathe.ePent tha

.R

,F chsee not to ionstruct the Stansl i,u".th Depatrment_ oanc-hid that such a M, -

KA.

Clear *cxntro.

w'-ea to tad nterconectm agreements negotiated

',Opelaing itcesnse for' Diablo,.Canymf Nodeaeet-.

nwances, then *ike

. i virodoftat~o "M

thsheesecniins&alb W~wrpst.' lrnits', And 3.' miodedl anthtrust asip cc anyr oulh edwal.autuutue o hs lsne cdin halb auhiso P, the 1.oZcfwn6 paragraphs A

~j:~~coePO~at5ato CrmtS tS se -

ondii to !-We Alsm ufidrwtaa that thm Departmenat

=huut`

.< t..at ceusei:. *,._

• tt i*hS ot-

• A. Applicant siell not unreasonably refuse

~~~~~~2C si~

o.~~h~fcalfo~h wetatiflof cc "

• CC Ub XtatWMMot CC6 Iritercombect.and operate normally In

-tbe 'u e

lon of ca tmemto In he p;arllty4 any M

Neigbboring lntity. ar to "ag antloompti C

60 lot

-a o *act" t

a.txteoWDc tith ay Heihboring Distrq~u

-'hate come tha aybte Such aitre zencteonn shall be atie at policies should pVdeo INO&. aW w

freact 1 refuse to tranIt pow-commn wit od UityI"l

'jptros tppl5 th *hh flOh15 ov

-ir In, ch~ea" coV by th *

-M R. & In onii5ctlon shall be at one point ee I

b pe5

.;.M

,s t antF' unless oth rwai naireed by the parties to an ea pshie'lo

t. 1 a

nn.on agrement. Inteconnection COMe Co-1*. mc 0

• 55 ax P4halt not be linited to lower voltages when

'Io t

COP'r big.er vol"tC ar preferiablo from the Msand Minter t

e a.'

, point otf od Utility 14ractile and ane avil*

-/ *e ere:Ie-*an s

h*A aow-

• No ITo Akpplcant. AppI*. eU('-wy Include M tbe Decesiasy"with respc t A. AppuIet-2 o

In any Inteetotinecon agreement proeviaons U

boring o

ppjLba'l OOh

. Mky NMOOW Corpordh*

hat afNeighboringeM s-cod 0-tIkN a. saw wamige a th "Iicenmse.

Distribution System mat" the poer fac 1, "OhND JL !ervift Arew.' se that WV& V!

Ur associated with its a,,

rabl*

~ ~

'th exeetr gegveh~aboundarte.

aite leW ota ananed by Apl Ut In the a~.4j opny e-aeee maecriel see ttea.hd am* and wse -comparable

~ eo~hA~en at'~cw

.. 3~the tutus, by Apptleeltt.. end Cn tboda to achieve this objective.

~~u~ee ~

ai hdit~t.t o eomtt~-~bot6eeas tIn poemte WA CeOD"e Call"

,0. Zntet onnCtloU agreements shall not

~Sb~0~

~~to St

'~l ejc~

'en provide ftesom marke eiiSe facilities or con Q

Abbef

,/..W let~$

Z,-

te tatuded *A OditIM6 Intuhe 00 IL A-trot eqIpM&en Mt the point of Intereon ne-c

,ZLbr twPOMM, pfttht WfUbl@ eiat? U

%6.3 *o th n erquired by Oood Utility M'ae

__a

?

-1

~o d~nInV

.Oti-,

tM6 nlee the parties utAually1 agree thvkt

~- '

d~A~a't'bepe.5racul'tor,3 sse~

In* patcat cUtrc~nv s

warrant speCdal f&.

- ~1 d'8l~am

~

~* '~w~w~

~-'

~D.

7b*e osi t additional taclitiles rt Xi; SthegW~f AUMue

'te' Viuru Ceb Oto qeeeto fteAII*)e fte the 3'bef?- quiried to provie service at the point of In

,* r

, r u '

C, *

-,-U Sha16t10 o*.gs--.M AY.....

rib

,b"am

,6-th

• cce

.'m;

-c b

f

-P

-ty from the Interconnection 4Jter consig eration of the mrlous tiaruactions for wbik the Interconnection facilities are to be use unless othei-wiss agreed byr the pertl...

X. An Lnteroonnectionj-creement all o Impose limiltations upon.the use or resale capacity and energy sold or exchanged und, the agseement except as may be required I Good Utnity Practice.

P. An intermnnection agreement shall prohibit any party from entering Into cth4 Interconnection agreements, but may provlT that (1)

Applicant receive adequate noth of any addtonal Interconnection arraun ment with others, (2) the parties Jointly aom

'-eider and agree upon additional contractw provisions, measures. or equipment, 'whic may be required by Good Utility Practice.as result of the new arrangement, and (3) A; plicant may terminate the ftrtercounectio agreement U the reliak~lty of Its system c ser*ice to its customec would be adversel affected by iuch addltJons Interconnectioa arrangement.

0. Applicant may Include provis*o*s In btteorcoanoc~ac agreensent requfrbng i

Neighbor Ing R-Uty or Xeighboring Distribu tion System to devlop with Applicant a 0o

,ordInated program for landerfreqjuency )oaw

&bedding and ts separation. Under such prm grame the part*e* shall equitably share UHi Interruption or curtailment of customer lod iX: XZ=#

COGOeWATION totr sio segement negotete*

P.uraujant to these license conditions shall Ix oubject to the follwn paragraphs A

through X regarding reaerve coordination:

A. Applicant and any Weighiboring 2t==3 with which It Interconnects shan jointt) esbItlh and seprate17 maintain the mini mum rmevwm to be Installed or otherwise provided -under sit 2nboeronection agree xment. Uwle otherwises, mutally agreed "upon. reservw shal be expresed as a per csntsgo of sestmated frm peak looed snd the mftftnim Tsrvea Percentage ab*a be at lest

,equal -to ApplieWmat-planned r ese2rv pei.

08fftWg w~ttot the insteronnectlon.

A Neighbsrig Kntty, shall not be required to prowde reserves for that Portion of its l0ad whicIP It mneets through purchases of Flrma Power WhIle diarent.0m.

percentages romy be specifed In voriant interconnection serrements: so Perty to en Interconinection agreesent shall be required to provid a

ga reeo

.-percentage t1n Applica nt Planned resrve percentage. except tha1 1f the total r2e01e Applicant inlle provide to s.aizitstn system reliablifty equal to that ex t

whbout s m

vn terco1 necton iWn L*

oge 'Isnreseidby won at V oasw~eslsl emelntlxheum the c* t potrt Or

-eoss may be required

• nsl om Isrov ddl~na reserves In the Paol azount at t

R.App iest snA ~'2fetghbbrg - MoUtIfti With -whch.ntotercounect 'Shaln jawnly estbhad Keprt*Vel vmAltant mini im, spini*nC rrveesI be pwroidled v4 SAL IntaOKonMetisa AVreeMA Unless 0014Wr

• Wine Mutually agreed upo. opinnin

_ve shanl be -

ase a P"s at peak 301164,and tse VNInbeumMM 1

. e Ve p cotage shell be ales4 eq)* toApiAar apinakag gloome percentg W~ttout the In tcoe~ions.

6A NeigbbaMg - b~lly shel Mot be reqUIred toprovide s"nning !"eat fwm.%M putioo eti "abd wsh ft S no be"etsn pa o mas torinsoo aeeCM agree.

laentall dM 'beqe oto Wpivt a a we""

rte" peorauisg than %tha h~

AgI pM 11 penivh opC Uvt tf the WWta

• epata wemves Apphot MA Pst faIS

• inlatao gstai relebfhty qua, totha NPTICES J-exbtlng without a givea lnterconnection oh arroseent art increased by reamof the

d.

new arrwagement. then the oeter prty c parties may be required to proide, &ddi ri tional spinning reasiv in &be faul anwacl rt or such increaseq.

er C. Applicsnt shal ofer-to sell. on reaso iY able terms and codltimon. Including a spec

-Med period. capecity to a Neaighborng =

At tity for use as reserves if ouch capacity UL er neither needed for Appricant'o own system le nor contractually occcnrtted to others and

-e If the Neighborin Engtty will offer to sell, on reseonable terms and cobdItiota its own such Capacity to Applicant.

kI D. Applicant may Include In any intercon Ih nection agreement provislrns requbIng a a

Nfeighboring Entity to compensate Applicant 1-for any reerves Applicant makes avxalablo a

an the result of the failure of such Neihtbor or ng eEttty to maintatn all or any part of the Y reserves it has agreed to provide in aid I nterconnectionskreement.

X. AppUiLnt sa2ll offer to coordinate maln tenXIAn schedules with Neighboring Vntitles I interconnected with Applicant and to ex change or sell maintenance eapeity and en*

Sergy when asue capacity and exerg we I

available and it to reasorabl to do so In Saccordance with ood Utlit Pructice.

IT.

MZmCX4Tv POTM Applicant skall sel emeryoncy power to any Interconnected 'Neighboring ntity Swhich maintains the leve of minimum re serve agreed upon with Applicant. arees o use due dirtgece to correct the, emergeocy.

end agrees to sell Cemeency power to Ap

• pDicant Applicant shall engage in sovch transctis Wf'and when capacity and M a tE7 for sAch tmneectim a available from Usa own generating remourcea. or may be ob tained by Applicant from other sourcs but only to the extent that It can do so without Impairing sertvic to AppIlcanta retall or wholesale rowel customers or Impairing its ability to discharge jice 0mominnitn.

v. arnza ?ovrz x~xn=;c~z, Should Applicant bave ca AMl or eetr lie,-with the Pederal Pones Commission.

agreements or rate schedules providing for the me and purchase t ashor-tarm capacity and energy. 12mited-term cap.city and en erW. Iout-term capecity "4 scowy or ecore Seter.

Appican shall, an a ftur asd equitable bask enter Into lapj cc samilar agreemonts.wt any NIeighboring wuty.

when ouch sras ta ofCapeal 4 and OeWu are available. recognizing that pras experienca, diffMernt econOMi pdnic

&J end Good Utilty Practsce may Im" tif wuervat late.

terms and coadrOm. Appicans ob&U 3oe imam Ut to b

m Ci NeIgborftg 3M-_

ttes concerning ale easabtiy yot eWack TL M*

w ic tm

• W3 POW SAL" UPcZn toueat. Appliant *hall off in to soln ft=

M Or i

requreMe POw juowe r

o a spectied p"d to an Interconnect Weighboring Entity or Neigborint Distt*,

tion Syse under a Can%%&&t wit reaso"abl Ier -MA ecadmitis lnotdsme

-minm which Pfrtw Applicant so r~voor us Coes

'9134k belftsh le pw misslntau" be cou Misten Wilh Od V11111ty Practice. Applicant MINaII net be equired bo banl FIrm l'"Mo Vbafteaf If ft Gve mock b~ave avsamlbe ovai thod goneawu or trunsmsecn toe Use, PsqW d Ouv"c or W Te mls

-samre Uwe to fts retan euis"W or mes VOLt to d esawome moi r

wtne t A. AppboaMn &MUl trannaft power pur.

suan~t 10 InMic elon otmeflb, w!t PCald Wbk ors "qoprtet to The Ve queote troamsction and Wh"c are Corsistent 20227 with them license conditions.

Mtcept, am oIktd below. such service shall be provided r

(1) between two or among more than two N-ohb*-rng X=Uftia or section of a Neigh boring Entitya sste S

Which are geographi.

cvlly pearated. with which. now or in the fu

• ture, Applicant Is nteiroonnected. (2) be tweea a Nesighboring SnUty witk which. now

• or In Lhe SubArs, it Is 2ntsrooovctid and one i or mce Waigbbng 1Xxstribution. Systems L with whbih. now or in the future. It in con nected &An (3) between any leigbb*r*ng Xntitty or Neighboring Distribution Bye tam(s) end the Applk:antla point ot direct Inteconnection wih any other electric syp ter engaging in bulk power supply outside the area than eleCtricaly served at retail by Applicant. Appcant shll not be required by SthIis 6eCU to transmit power (1) from a hydrcoectric facility the ownership of wbich has been LneoLuntarly trsnsferred from Ap plicat or (2) from a Neighboring Enuty for sale to any electric system located outside the exUrior geographic boundaries of the several areas ten alectrically sered at re tal1 by Applicant It any other Neighboring ZntiTy. *ekihboring Distribution System, or Applicant wish.o.to purchase such power at an equiralent p-rice for use Ithin Wid ares Any Neighboring Mntity or Neighboring Me tribution System (a) requesting transmson servloe shall give reasonable advance notice to Applicant of Its schedule and require ments. Applicant shall not be required by this ection to provide transmission service i the proposed,trumtion would be Incon Asitect with Good Utility Practice or if the neoeswaz7 trsnamimion facilities ar com mltted at the Ve of the request to be fully loaded during the period for which service is requested. cr have been previoudty rmervee by Applicrat for emern mey purposes. loop Dow. or other uses consistent with Good UtIlity PMrtice; provided, that with respect to the Pacift Worthwest-Southwest intertle.

Applicant shall aot be required by thts acc t10 to provide the requested transarnaion erice 3. It would Impair Applicant's own sOf this fucility consistent with the Don neVsle ProWect Act. (60 Stat. 7l. August 20, 1937). Pacifc Northwest Power Marketlng Act (78 Stat. 7M" August S1. 1954) and the Public Works Appropriations Act, 1M (70 "t.

M. A lut 39, 19).

R. Applicant shall Include In Its planning and contrvction progreans such Increases im Me Ur~saio~al-Capacity 4w such additional rnonisuo tadlsltee as may be required

-for tb& i*a tcicmre tfrsrud to In paragraph A of thi Section, provided any Neighboring Matity of )e" baring Distribution System gives Appflosot sufacent advance notice as MAY be eOsm 7rY to aCCommXdat4 its re.

qu1irsmam grw a regulatory and technical soaapoin* sad provided fUrthe that the en.

MiY requestng trsansmioolon services earn Fpe-&e AWpiAcant for the CU Incurred as a reesult of the request. Vwhee transmisslon capity will be Increased or sdlitionnl truslmson tacilItime will ibe Installed to prOvide o maintain the requested service to at NOeibboriA ngKttY or Neighboring Distri buUo- £aetoa. Applicant may require. in additoo to a rate tor wee of other facilities.

that paMent of Cots assoc*a*ed with the incresed eapacity, or addtional %cilltt#Re shall be tab" by tbA eruee in accor&ance with wan In asvmaoe their respective upe of the now -aPacity Or faciliie.1

0. 1a00ing hereiM Shall reQUire Appli Oeat (1) to construt addifl.cal transmiA

.aloo facifllti if the construction of such Is etLiti Is Incentun with Good Utilty WrACIftea It sAh fael tieMs Could be con cd without duptI*etng any portion of Applicants banommimion Qsysbe (it) bopro at 51) to construct %rnweafkt' cuidd te area thnm electrically oerod at rtal by Applkant.

a M

O 14M VO

41.

M 94--#OISAY. mAir i.

19/

Y,

2022*8 -

NOTICES D Rlate schedules and &Mreements for In Accordance with the then-existng law tenton transmission services provided uander this conditions an may at the ti",e be Appropriate Rto!

-s-ection shall be filed by Applicant with the and Good Utility Practice.

legulatory agency having jurisdiction over wL Thee l Ucense conditions do not require I Date, such rates and Agreements.

AppUcant to become a common carrier..

29th da yrm. Ac-ms To xcUr.-aR G¢xn.ATION

[FR DoC 76-14280 Filed 5-14-76)8:45 aml For I A. If a Neighboring Entity or Neighboring sion.

Distribution System makes a timely request

[Docket No. 50-2711 to Applicant for an ownership participation in the Stanislaui Nuclear Project, Unit No. I VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER or any future nuclear generating unit for CORP.

which Applicant applies for a construction permit durin# the 20-year period immedi-Issuance of Amendment to Facility F1R R ately following the date of the construction Operating License permit 'for Stanilsauls Unit No. 1. Applicant Notice is hereby given that the U.S.

shall offer the requesting party an oppor-Nuclear:

Regulatory Commission (the tunity to participate In such units, up to an Amount rea.sonable In light of the relative Commission) has issued Amendment No.

loads of the pasticipanta. Wlth respect to 22 to Facility Operating License No.

StAniaaus Unit No. I or any future nuclear DPR-28 -Issued to Vermont Yankee Nu-On C generating unlit, a request for participation clear Power Corporation which revised lators shall be deemed timely If.received within Technical Specifications for bperatlon of uiL R

90 days after the mailing by Applicant to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Sta-those s Neighboring. Entities and Neighboring Dis tion. located near Vernon. Vermont.

the NE tribution Systems of an announcement of This amendment Is effective as of its date mation its intent to tonstruct the unit and a re quest for an expression of interest In par-of Issuance.

uch ir ticip&Uon. Participation shall be on a basis The amendment modifies Technical Indiu-id which compensates Applicant far a reason-Specification Table.3.1.1 to clarify and publih Able share of all its costs. incurred and to refine the requirement governing oper-licatlof be Incurred. inplanning. selecting a sits for, ator response to a failed instrument r

constructing and operating the facility.

channet. This amendment also makes proa Z. Any Neighboring.Entity or any Neigh-minor ediPtoral changes to the Techncal o

boring Distribution System making a timely inocrtlitiona cand orrect the T

re-tens request for participation in a nuclear unit, Oficatiron mend re rtnst fre-(41 1 must enter into a legally bindlng and en-QUeny of environmental reporting from (Z1ZR forceable agreement to assume financial re-monthly to annually consistent with the (4g be ln~be sponsiblUty for its share, of the Costa a-changes of Amendment No. 17 Issued No ated with participation in the unit And. vember 5 1975. rhese changes to the asociated tranml'lol

, facilities.

Unless tnvironmental rtporting frequeny were D13l0 otherwise agreed by Applicant. ai Neighbor-Inadvertently omitted from Amendment omc f

Ing Entity or Neighboring Distribution.Sys NO 17.

sponse tom desiring participation must have sgnedu such an agreement within one, year after' The application, for the azplndmen Applicant has provided to that *eighboring complies with the standardA and require-Thle Entity or Neighboring Distribution, System, ments-or the Atomic Eneriy Act of 19-54.

that Ir pertinent financial and technical data bear-. as aplended (the Act). ani the Commis-does n Ing on the feasibility of the Project *hich n lon's rules and regulat"on in 120 C.R denyin Are then available to Applicant.-ApPlicant mission' has made as)pr late ftndlings geo shall provide Additional pertinent dats_9 as8 required by the Act "nd the Commis-This aj they become available during the year. The

• o rie" and regulation-In 10 CFR. *en co requesting party 'shall pay, lo Appllcant -

rules an w

e u fort In 10 ten co rorthwith the additional expenses Incurred Chapter I. whih kre set forth-in the 1-ca*se*s by Applicant In making such financial and cense -amendmhent. Prior.publlc notice of slstanc technical data *avlable.

Zn any perticpA this amendment was not..required since would Lion agreement isubject to 'ths Section. Ap:,

Vie amendment does Inot Invohvei sixe-Pertaft pUcant may require p;ovisions requirnOg payf,-.-

lfcant hzards consideraion, system Oient by each p cPaont o~r Its share 0; all c-,rI The Comm=ssion has detoermined that Inte vosts Incurred u)I to tbe date of t*

agree-. the Issuance of this ameodment will not milt wi ment. requiring each participant thtreaftb?

to pay Ilt pro rata-shae of fundssas -they result 4n &Ml slntfcait environmental rule b are expended -for the plauning &Ud,on.

Impact and that pursuant to t0 CFR have struction, of unite an telated facilitles. and I bl.5(d) (4) an enirrronmnental state-amend requiring each participant,30 make such A-" ment. nekative declaration or envil'on ftguepla nancIal arangements a way.be ZOeceeO y mental Impact appraisal need not be amend to' ensure the ability.o1 the participant '10 prepared in OoMeneton with LJsuance of

"- pUr, continue to g*.ke such Itsy.

-n.. -,..

thi alindmlnt..

1954.,

1"WFV&iI ZXrTA~TOW X 7IP' further details.,ilth rre, et to this -rdstic A. Al l-ates, charges..

-term and

,r

, action.

"'afet (1) the application for Suor are and sha.ll be Subject to~tbe seePtawt ies mendll'ttt datod Decembeir 8. 1915, (2),1 United an apr'slotfi~t. SPny lawts7 agencse or Amltrxidfntl No,. 22 to Licensee No. DPR-inents eort appoval,, -juisdction aWm hem..

28, 3)'.the Commssion's related eafeti n

courts having Safm

,S.t,=

S. 10tht Di iotained'barolfl sha~ll enarge K auiAton.ri (4).AmenwrAien% No.. 17 doeumn amy, rights edia N(eighboring Xntlty 4ir Pleigh I Iýt u

M no DpI(-43 bu No. es-

&m borinDt.stdlbutIOA eysem 't.o i

1M,8. and lated documents. All of ment.

ess to retail tutomers Ap ca b"

- thes.Items arn avallable loe public in-T the righta they Uee undeir statec~~o"

,r*,-*,

m

. pectlot.at.. tht Cnmmsonla Publc amend low.

am.' nllb hl om. 771 tet.NW.e-l1 C. Nothing In thnlicense abi Dcumnt.e n?]

tee.MW be construed as a waiver " Applicant at Its Washi twool. D.C. and atn* t rOhe mernt rights to eontest the applicaton ot an? COM-liemorial L~brarY. 224Main Street.Bamt caltinsnt herein te a particuWa fsetUa)5itus. "tieor Vermocit. A CoPy of Itemsn (2). (3)

PR D.

e6 eludeaaddremedSo ttV U.8.

ReAtreatorA The prisate for=. to sok such ehanges-tft Cnmmspakm Washhwton. D.C. M53. At, wh

""O"A 1" 0

".VOL

41.

W H.94-MO4IOAY. MAY 17. 191" r"

.,.S,*.

Director, Division of Operating a at Bethesda, Maryland. this yof April. 1976.

Zhe Nuclear Regulatory Commis RowZrT W. Rurr.

Operating Reactors Branch No.

4, Division of Operatino Re actors.

)oc.76-i4283 Filed 5-14-76:8:45 am]

PRIVACY ACT.OF/1974 lotices of Systems of Records:

Amendments of Routine Uses

)ctober l. 1975. the Nuclear Reku Commlisslon published in the FzzD scisTza (40 FR 45332) notices of

ýyteis of records maintained by LC w#Ich contain persozial infor about individuals and from which Lforma~ton can be retrieved by an

,ual Identifled. The notices were Led as a document subject to pub in the annual compilation of Act documents.

osed amendments of the NTRC Sys Lf Records were published in the

. Rbxms, oli February 5, 1976 5356) proposing that the follow established as a routine use for all NRC systems:

• sure may be made to a Congressional orn the record of 'an Individual in re to an Inquiry from the Congrieseyonal ade st-the request of that individual.

ameidmnent is intended to assure plemeritat&Jo U tle Prhacy Act ot have the Unlniltended "4frect of gindividuals the benefit of Con nal assistance which they request.

mendment would obviate the writ nsept of the individual in those where the Individual requests as

-e of a Member of Congresi which entail a disclosure of informt~lon ins to the Individual *Ithin,a rested persons wer'invlted to sub ritten comments aft the proposed y March 10, 1976. Nb commenta been received on! the proposed.

ments. Actordingly. the Nuclear story Commisslon has ddopted-the mnents as propose*.

Luant to the Atomic Energy Act or as amended. Upe Enfrgy Iteora an Act of 1974. r*

amended, and S52 and 552a of 'ltte 5 of %the States Code. the following amend to thi Commisilon's Notlces of.

s of Recordi are published as a ent subject to publicaUonlin the I -omptlationoT Privacy Act docu 1

X N

Bystemns of Records are dby adding the following ?e otire Use to the Prefatory State of Oeneral Routine Uses:

tUATOYT STATINMEK or OtHERAL tRoriltnz U,,n following routine uses apply to system of records notice set forth d*

EXHIBIT 3

P.

WAS*ITONO.

l SI NUCLIAR uM~cULAYCMMeo q'***"SEP 15 l978 Docket ties. 50-275AS 50-323A p-564A Pacific Gas and Electric CompanY ATTH Mr. John C. Morrisser el Vice Presiden t

and 77 Beale St*reet 94 0 S an F aR e " D iablo C any on N ucl ear P lant,

Units I and 2 Gentlemen:

addressed to the Assistant Atrney In 0, letter daetd AVri 3D. 1976, state~ stc.teAi General. Antitrust Divion S

d~

opn as follows:

oftepacif ic Gas and Electric Company d

of ci the Ga an lcrc c

aY is herewith submitting to tI U S. Department of justice the attached stater I as condftoe$s i n

u~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ltet i.o*

• 0u*

h

• n cluded---,*

the Suclear p~andZ is willing to have t-n oprating license i s* dbony t osen ee constr-ucton permit and o

?Ps open atio of the l

the constct" son for cons tion and 1 01ton th Regulatory Comnsi Ic n

itfo theato antitrust h 0

StanislaUs Nuclear ProJect, Unit Is.sill that t e

advise the Nuclear Regulatory CO Iio th t

no aenit.

trus the~r is neces in connection with the licensig of a*

e unrmit fn th s

neeslGandEls applicationfraorprtfrte event laut a uclear project Unit I i thdruclaw egulatory lI Stands.

... eit is not issued bY the Ma ue ts laCetsers) f.

piermi to r sul h

,7un c Is willing to have,it lic nse s or

• riob to Culy 'uclear power Plant. Units I and 2, a e

n porate the Cormit,,ents o* Naoyi 5 76,C othe Asistanet Attorney General advised the Nuclear Do V y s, 1 976 t a,

ic nses issued by, the NRC to the -Co manSfy for the St&nislaus project we st hearing would wat be r

Sttmn fCwenitmfeEntS. an anti truthaigwudotb c sY To date a construction permit for the Stanislaus Nuclear ProJect Unit 1 has not been issued. Accordingly* in keeping with the above quoted Compas y commimuent. this is to edvise you that it is our present lntent;Ion to *mend construction Permits CPPR-39 and CppR-69 issued to the Company on April 23. 1968 and December 9 1970., respectively.,

for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant. Units 1 and 2 to incorporate as conditions the Statement of Comitments appended to the ComPany's letter of April 30, 1976.

We expect these amendments to be issued pursuant to the Cmuimssion's regulations sometime in October.

Sincerely.

Antitrust and Indemnfty 6roup Office of Nuclear Ieactor Regulation cc:

Donald A. Kaplan, DOJ TnTpI P.R."*

P.03/10

EXHIBIT 4

AUG-08-2002 13:34 P. 02/02 c

-IT^1 rSOJ2Th-E

• aas B X.B C T 2J1i C Cs C) 3\\[ rl=alt*ff D Q'--

77 PEALE STREET SAN FPANCISCO. CALIVORNIA S 40Q 1

(415) 70l.

21 I JOHN; C. MORRISSEY VICE puC2I7Z-r ni atrtp.crn%

September 19, 1978 Mr. Jerome Saltzman, Chief Antitrust and Indemnity Group Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Dear Mr.

Saltzman:

Docket Nos.

50-275A, 50-323A, P-564A Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2 in accordance with the spirit of our letter of April 30, 1976 quoted in your letter of September 15,

1978, Pacifiq Gas and Electric Company has no objection to the amendment of the Construction Permits as proposed in your letter.

Sincerely, cc:

Donald A. Kaplan, DOJ Znt.

TnTPI P. F12

EXHIBIT 5

59934 NOTICES

)

"[

75901-M]6 The staff has determined that the Is.

suance of these amendmients will not

"(Docket No. 50-320]"

'[Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-3n3) result in any significant environmen (Doket.2 tal Impact and that pursuant to 10

,METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. ET AL.

PACIIIC GAS

&. -ELECTRIC CO.

(DIABLO CFR Section 51.5(d)(4) an environ S-.CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS I mental impact statement. -or liegative Issuance of Amendmenf to Facility. Ope&v'tiRg AND 2)

N, declaration and environmental impact Lcene IoA mappraisal need not be prepared in con "L"et Isguance of Amendment to Conslruclion~

nection.wlth issuance of t1bese amcnd The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com-Permits ments.

mission (the Com~mlssion) has issued Amnendment 8 to Facility Operating The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com-

• For further details with respect to License No. DPR-73. i.tuvd to the mission (NRC) has issued Amend-'

this action, see (1) letters related to Mc:tropoliLtn Edison Company. Jersey tients 1 and 4, respcctively. to Con-thie amendments dated April 2D.-1976.

struction Permit-Nos. CPPR-39 and May 5, 1976. September 15. 1978. and

-Central Power.& Light Company, and CPPR-69 issued to thePacifIc Gas.and September 19. 1978. (2) Amendment Pennsylvania -Electric Company. for Electric Company for-Diablo Canyon

- Nos. 1 and 4 to CPPR-39 and CPPR operation of the Three Mile Island

Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. 1o-

69. respectively, and (3) the staff's re

.Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (the facility).

cated in San Lpis Obiifpo County. Cali-lated Evaluatior of an Amendment to located In Dauphin County. Pennsyl-fornia.

Include Antitru*t Conditionsin the vania.'The amendment is effective as The amendmenta provide for the Fid-Diablo Canyon.lSastruction Permits.

of its 'datpof issuance.

dition of certain antitrust conditions.

All of these items and other related I'he license is..amended by' revising The Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power material are available for public in certain,IechnIcali:'Sp~cifications to-Plant is not subject to ai antltrt-.t spection at the' Commission's Public permit operation'at*reduced po..cr review under' Sectio~n 105C-of the Document Room. 1717 H Street. N.W..

permi.

.,bratl -,.,-r..cc PC,"

revetncerpwrilnsaesb ulcDcmn~omlctdi a

lev6ls -with.rcduccd'.reactor coolant Atomic Energy Act, as amended. More Washington. D.C. and at the Local systn~l~.,.r~~QX4

,recent nuclear power plants are.sub-

-Public DocumentRoom located In San

-systeri tflow.

T 40 amendment to such review: However, in con-Luis Obispo County Free Library, P.O.

.

.The application for.,thc-ýmendment Ject t S-nection with the NRC's proccediligs Box X, Smn Luis Obispo. California' S"..'

complies 'ith the standurds'.and re-on thleStanislaus Nuclear Project, Pa-93406.

""utremen`ts-`ofthe,:Atomic Energy Act cific as and Electric Company agreed A copy of items (1), (2), and (3) may

%.of 1954.. vaýsljeiidd (the Act), and the-to include antitrust commitments as be obtained, upon written request to.

• Commissions' rules'afnd-rigulations.,

conditions in the Diablo Canyon 1I-the

"..S. Nuclear Regulatory CommLi SThe"'Commlssion'-as' a.de*'eppr

- enses in certain circumstances which sion, Washington, D.C. 20.555. ATTN:

":itefindings a*ofluiied bylhe Act aid -have 6c.urre.

Director. plvision ofProject Manage i

nlighs's-In a letter to the U.S. Department of ment,'Office of Nuclear Reactor Regu t o_.e*--C.*

Ch^ptkr*- I-,y whIch - i-e-.Justice (DOJ). dated April*30. 1976.

ltion.

+:*e fd~i:Ir~t*¢i+`+i-eifijejnd it.**'-; PGE stated-* that,,in the event a con

,.*et ftosrtlrit'*inth se*.,

stated ta.rnthe-evst aAcn-a Dated at Bethesda. Maryland. this e'Cin'di-imined -t*S.ruCtionl.j.drmit

-Tor -'the-Stanislaus 6th day of December 1978.

ht~h7*1l" is *ai~iendmenIt Nuclear P..

ect was not issued by the

• *ywll.~

ti*tx

.i~fic*if envi +*:;NRC prior. to July 1. 1978, PG&E was, FOR', THE NUCLEAR REGULA

.+

thl:*th*Pir-ua-"

willing to.have its license(s) for the, '.TORY COMMISSION.,

• ,VDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plants.,':,

JOHN F. STOLZ.

-:--t Slenviinme

,Units,1 and 2. amended to incorporate "Chief,,, Light Water Reactors t pac state'me'iit"Ot antitrust n.ommitmehts.

This ant tBranch NO. 1, Division of Proj.

"XUo:gavionnnana eno e

al"..willingness was contingent upon the' ect -Man ajemenL

• priafl redn con*.DOJ advising the NRC that,nc anti-Fi8 8

arnl

-tonwiththhs action."

'+"+

• '-:- trust hearing was necessary hficonnec-r*-

.with licensing th',, Stanistlaus.

• _thls action.'see+(1)(xAnienidmrent VNN6.1 8 -;ProJect..,The DOJ 8 'provided suc"

. 75"90-01-M]

• to" Pacil~tY. Op-e-rathigF*ic.ense*

..,-advice in a letter datLcrMay 5. 1976.

R tfpR

-73,an5i (2) the Co iiision

=e;; Since notonstructifn permit for the

[Docket No. 50-312]

ated.safet e

utotsla Project had yet been issued.

/ Anendrnent.No..8to,Fidlity.+Op*

,the NRC staff advised PG&E.*In' a

. SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT S

Tletter dated September 15,'1978. of its Issuance of Amendment tdacility Operating gU&eav e T&

-'-thi t

intention to Include the'ahtitrust corm "aalalfor-bb*ipetd uspeet _mitments as conditions in the Diablo 0the-nission -cumPub

.ent Canyon Constructlon-Permits. PG&E 'The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comn

--Roorii-1717 H5tjeet7N..Wahing responded. in a letter dated September tMission (the Commission) has Issued ton, 1D.C.'-ad at.the.Sfate&.Library of-19 1978, statingthat it had no objec- -Amendment No.*26 to Facility Qperat "Penealth tion to such an amndmerit..

Ing License No. DPR-54, Issued tgSac WilnutotStibets;)IarPennSY1 The -amendments yomply wlith 'the ramento Municipal Utility Distrij, v-nia 1. 2.

s ard ad 'reciuirementts' of the.- which revised Technical Specifications S.

';rn_.*h.

A-to-tice Energy. Avt of 1954. es amenld-for operation of the Rancho Seco 'Nu ethesda*Mrlnd.-

e

= i*- h'd"- y'bf Dec+ b~r'i8.Maryland

,.ts (the, Act) "'anc the -Commission's clear Generating Station (the facility);

fe8 regulatlons,'The staff has made appro-located-in Sacramento-Couftjy. Cali S....l th:dayk _6f Det r'[7...... :*.,

/

0r g la in j-.-FOR --THE 1"UCILSAR. --- EGuJA'- priateifindings 4 required by' the Act fornia. The.amendment is ekectve as T.C9.SIN

+*S andi.tGle qmmisslovs regulatioons in of Its date of Issuance.

T R

'.COM STEIO"*.,

10 CF,.Ch-aptd,l, which are set forth The amendment revises the.Techni

.4),-

Si i A..VYRGAk -,',In the ahmendment.

cal Specifications to reflect plant oper

":;'*:*x:-h.ht-! Waterý.:Rcactors.*'.-',/n-.accordaice withi 10 CiPR 56.91, ating limits for the fuel'loading to be Branch'4,= Di'son "of P roiJecit,}']'rior' public notice of 'these amend-, used during Cycle 3.

Managcm@ti..

..ments wks not required sivce thý".

,The application for the amendment b.1FR Doc. 78-35563 Filed 12-21-78 8:45 amlj amendi ents do not inilolve significant,cdmplies. with the standards and -re 1,-az_

<lfdsconssderato

]

quiremen6s of the Atomic Energy Act

'.-' 4-/

+.

o

'.*-. +;

FgDERAL REGISTtR;'VOt 43, NO. 247-FRIDAY, DECEMBE, 22, 1978 4=:,.-...-

.+

+

4*

)J:

4.

.2

i.

-...+ -, ~ ~~.

-,:v.* *

..