ML021350516

Final - Qa/Related Forms

ML021350516
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	03/18/2002
From:	Diane Jackson Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
References
05000354/2002-301 05000354/2002-301
Download: ML021350516 (17)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201 -2 Quality Checklist Facility: oPE C1 leF- Date of Examination: '711 /C,/ Z Initials Item Task Description a b"c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. 04 W

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with d7?

TI Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categones are appropriately sampled. , V T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ____

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. £t- - ,

2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5. verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of ,

normal evolutions, instrument and comp nent failures, and major transients. ____

S SI b. Assess whether there are enough scdnario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no sqenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*,

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible. assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and ,

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, -/

W (2) no more than 30% of the test materi0l is repeated from the last NRC examination, '"

/ (3)° no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks. V J_" I

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition.

(3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure.

(4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance- -"

based activities.

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of "o, applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days. 0

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

P ý=Siqiý /ate/

a. Author J6 , 10

b. Facility Reviewer(*)) G(. k .

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 5' 14rn,/2'- ,

d. NRC supervisor t' e Note: " Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

23 of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

I'-

or NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0027(Z) C-i ATTACHMENT 2 -I Page 1 of I U) 0 udit Examination Security Agreement

1. Pre-Examination z 0

for the week(s) of 34/o'z* 3- as of the date C/

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled who have not been authorized by the of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons W performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered NRC ohief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. 0--

of examination these licensing examinations from this date until completion m in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that Furthermore. I amt, -iware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented or the facility licensee. >

violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against memay have been examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief compromised.

0 0n

2. Post-Examination concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered To the best of my knowled e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information I did not during the week(s) of*J fiz. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted instruct evaluate, or prov e performance feedback to those applicants U) below and authorized by the NRC.

,1 SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY

4. I)AVcb 0 L-, ý 1 r9 ____4

10. Z-.4.kt*,L,-E-* S-.o Nuclear Common Page 16 of 25 Rev.3 I

I NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0027(Z) 0 r oi kC/)

ATTACHMENT 2 0-1 0

m Page 1 of I U)

--I (Zudit Examination Security Agreement C)

1. Pre-Examination z I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ?/)72-o I.-as of the date --)

of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the U/)

C)

NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or proyide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered m these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been -I compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowleoge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 3L)Ž(o-. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE SA

_ý

2. d-,

10. J,,'* */EPTi/*.,,/L

.*~

A-) C C) 0s, 1/<e .

&-AX _o*[ I-P 17

13. j)AI _SE Nuclear Common Page 16 of 25 Rev. 3 U

0r or I

0o>

U)4 -)

NC.TQ-TC.ZZ-0027(Z) 0-H F:

0 ATTACHMENT 2 A z I

Page 1 of I V1 a

(jaAudit Examination Security Agreement o

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of /2- o-- as of the date zM 0

of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the C)

NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these.licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

C Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that (A violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. -I I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been T compromised. P1

--I

2. Post-Examination 7 C) r-I To the best of my knowl dgg, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 3)i z, L-. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examin'ation administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted P1 0

below and authorized by the NRC.

u'1 M

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE V)1

".C- C6z -Y P1

2. :ý L; tI4.-*

V1.J,-' <*,- SL-OQ t - .. L.4 i.2-5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12 13.

Nuclear Common Page 16 of 25 Rev. 3

ES-3Ol ES-3

- - -. , ,*.j.;L .Uly '.-,eLit. [ rI-tI' t*..U I-,

I Facility: Date of Examination: Operating Test Number:

Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent sampling requirements (e.g.. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, with (?q od safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

C. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section Dil.a). I__ -

2 /

d. limits.ap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable .

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions

• initiating cues

- references and tools, including associated procedures

- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

- specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the Z*)

criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301 C. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within a acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

d. At least 20percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

0* ___

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA

a. FThe associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 1

a. Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name I Signature Date

a. Author. ?dt 2///0 2.

b. Facility Reviewer(*) - 6 . 4.'2 ____.____

3~

J . /DSeE

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) _ .. i?4/r"For') ',/"7

d. NRCSupervisor NOTE: " The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;' chief examiner concurrence required.

23 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 ES-30mmi* U iUY.KIsL -ru iii -L-3U 1-4 Facility: (-/' Ci_4e. Date of Exam: OS /i l0 7.. Scenario Numbers: /I / Operating Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b" c# I

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of i 02 service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist miostly of related events.

6/0

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

! b. / '

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

given. Cues are 4Z3

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned have been scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All ,

other scenarios have been aitered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form the form along with the simulator scenarios).

ES-301-6 (submit Q. "

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficultyis appropriate to support licensinq decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) Actual Attributes .. .. .

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 5, bIo

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) __I__ /

3. Abnormal events (2-4)

4. Major transients (1-2) leI I "-k

5. EOPs enteredfrequiring substantive actions (1-2)

/,, ,

6.

7.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 0 1 1'(2, Critical tasks (2-3) 2z 1 2,/ I 0 /

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 26

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist FORM ES-301-5 Page 1 of 1 Operating Test Number: (

A4 Minimum Scenario Number du Applicant Type Evolution Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 2 Normal 1 1 RO(1) Instrument 4 35 25,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 3 Normal 0 As RO Instrument 24 Component Major 1 6 SRO-1(6)

Reactivity 0 Normal 1 1,2 As SRO Instrument / 2 Component Major 1 6 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 1,2 SRO-U(7) Instrument 2/

Component Major 1 6 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements.

David M. Rein I-7ý/\J_. ,

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

62 Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 31 of 64 Rev. 1

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist FORM ES-301-5 Page 1 of 1 Operating Test Number: !I Minimum Scenario Number Applicant Type Evolution Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 3 Normal 1 1 RO(2) Instrument / 47 45 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument /2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 1,2 SRO-U(8) Instrument 23 Component Major 1 6 Instructions: (4) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(5) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(6) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements.

Author: David M. Rein I Z

• NRC Reviewer:

//

Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 31 of 64 Rev. 1

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist FORM ES-301-5 Page 1 of 1 Operating Test Number: I Minimum Scenario Number Applicant Type Evolution Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 2 Normal 1 1 RO(3) Instrument 4 35 2,5,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument /2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (7) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(8) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(9) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements.

Author: David M. Rein NRC Reviewer: 4qjj Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 31 of 64 Rev. 1

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist FORM ES-301-5 Page 1 of 1 Operating Test Number: I Minimum Scenario Number Applicant Type Evolution Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 3 Normal 1 1 RO(4) Instrument / 47 45 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (10) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(11) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(12) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements.

Author: David M. Rein / D7/('I-h NRC Reviewer:

Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 31 of 64 Rev. 1

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist FORM ES-301-5 Page 1 of 1 Operating Test Number: I MinimumScenario Number 4 Minimum S 2 u 3b Applicant Type Evolution Type Number 1 2 3 4 Reactivity 1 2 Normal 1 1 RO(5) Instrument 4 35 25,7 Component Major 1 6 6 Reactivity 1 Normal 0 As RO Instrument 2 Component Major 1 SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1 As SRO Instrument 2 Component Major 1 Reactivity 0 Normal 1 SRO-U Instrument 2 Component Major 1 Instructions: (13) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(14) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(15) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements.

David M. Rein / t -

Author:

NRC Reviewer: 411161 Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 31 of 64 Rev. 1

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Competencies Checklist FORM ES-301-6 Page 1 of 1

(-spplicant #1 #2 ,f-.pplicant

,--.pplicant #3 (R)ROI!/SRO U (R9SRO-I/SRO-U (R9*SRO-!/SRO4U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Understand and Interpret 3,5, 2,62,5, 2,4, 3,5, 2,6 Annunciators and Alarms 6 6,7 5,6 6 Diagnose Events and 3,5, 2,6, 2,6, 4,5, 3,5, 2,6, Conditions 6 7 7 6 6 7 Understand Plant and System 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 2,3, 2,3, 1,2, Response 5,6 6,7 5,6, 4,5, 5,6 6,7 7 6 1,2,1,2,1,2, Comply With and Use 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 4,5, 2,3, 5,6, Procedures (1) 5,6 5,6, 5,6, 6 5,6 7 7 7 23 1,2, 1,2, 3,4, 2,3, 1,2, Operate Control Boards (2) 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6 7 7 56,6 7 Communicate and Interact 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 3,4, 2,3, 1,2, With the Crew 5,6 5,6, 5,6, 5,6 5,6 5,6, 7 7 7 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech.

Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: David M. Rein /

NRC Reviewer:

If Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 32 of 64 Rev. 1

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Competencies Checklist FORM ES-301-6 Page 1 of 1

-,,Applicant#4 --.,pplicant #5 Appat #6 (R~RO-I!SRO-U (*9SRO I/SROUUO(R-I$O Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Understand and Interpret 2,5, 2,4, 3,5, 2,6 2,4 2,4, Annunciators and Alarms 6,7 5,6 6 2 5,6 5,6 Diagnose Events and 2,6, 4,5, 3,5, 2,6, 2,4, 4,5, Conditions 7 6 6 7 5,6 6 Understand Plant and System 1,2, 2,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 2,3, U estand 5,6, 4,5, 5,6 6,73,4, 4,5, Response 7 6 5,6 6 Comply With and Use 1,2, 4,5, 2,3, 1,2, 2,3, 4,5, Procedures (1) 7 6 5,6 6 6 Operate Control Boards (2) 5,6, 1,2, 3,4, 342,, 2,3, ,2, 1,2, 34, 34 7 5,6 5,6 7 5,6 Communicateand Interact 1,2, 23 1,2, 1,2, 5,6, 5,6 2,3 5,6, 3,4, 3,4, With the Crew 7 , 7 5,6, 5,6 7

Demonstrate Supervisory 2,3, 4,5, Ability (3) 6,7 Comply With and Use Tech. 4 Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: David M. Rein / ý /k. -

NRC Reviewer: Jtb/ý,

Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 32 of 64 Rev. 1

NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-0027(Z)

ES-301 Competencies Checklist FORM ES-301-6 Page 1 of 1 Applica~t-# , Applicao RO/SRO-!c- RG/RO440k Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Understand and Interpret 2,4 2,4 Annunciators and Alarms 5,6 5,6 Diagnose Events and 2,4, 2,4, Conditions 5,6 5,6 Understand Plant and System 1,2, 1,2, Response 3,4, 5,6 3,4, 5,6 Comply With and Use 2,3, 2,3, Procedures (1) 4,5, 6 4,5, 6

Operate Control Boards (2) 1,2, 1,2, Communicate and Interact 3,4, 3,4, With the Crew 5,6, 5,6, 7 7 Demonstrate Supervisory 2,3, 2,3, Ability (3) 4,5, 6,7 4,5, 6,7 Comply With and Use Tech. 4 Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: David M. Rein L/j, NRC Reviewer:

.rc6 L/

Last saved: 01/10/2002 10:09 AM Page 32 of 64 Rev. 1

SENT BY:TRAINING CENTER  ; 3 2 : 10:55 ; PSE&G NUCLEAR- 6103375320;# 1/ 4 ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist F a c ft : L~ u l i a ate of Ex m. Ex a m Leve i -' S.R O Initial

_Item Description a_ V ca

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility ="

2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all quesUons

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available al-I

3. ROISRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Sectilon D.2.d of ES-401

. g ,.

4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic samplinq process

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed: or

- the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

- the examinations were developed independently; or

- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explin)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right L/

2- C)

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehenslon/analysis level: " L" enter the actual question distribution at riht

8. Referencesthandouts provided do not give away answers f

9. Question content conforms with specific W/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned: deviations are justified

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES. Appendix B, guldelines (LI

11. The exam withcontains value on100, one-point, agrees cover sheet multiple choice items; the total is correct and O-LE?*

Printed Name Signature Date

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) O4"f177> A, .>Z --

d. NRC Regional Supervisor PI. T Tr 7 Note: The facility reviewers Initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Indepndent NRC reviewer initial items in Column 'c:. chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021. Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 MAR-07-2002 10:47 6093393997

SENT BY:TRAINING CENTER  ; 3 2 ; 10:55 ; PSE&G NUCLEAR- 6103375320;# 2/ 4 ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Faiit:

-Date of Exam 31, o0 Exam Level- R(SRJO Initial Item Descriptlon

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facilit,

2. a. NRC KJAs referenced for all questions b Facility learning objectives referenced as available a 6

3. ROISRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES.401 Oo

4. Question selection appears consistent and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams with a systematic sampling process 41,,

5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

__the audit exam was cornpleted before the license exam was started: or

_ the examinations were developed independlentiy; or

- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

- other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new.

and the rest modified); enter the actual questiontht3 distribution at right C1 LL r

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam written (including at the 10 new questions) level comprehension/analysis are enter the actuaýl uestion distribution at fiqht Y'

• S- alrý b2

8. References/handouts provided do not .give away answers 0*

9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned: deviations are justified o- I-)[

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES. Appendix B. guidelines af A 11 The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items: the tolal is correct and aorees with value on cover sheet . ..... ..

Printed Nam, i Sigature Date

a. Author 'f:4:;+.

4J%44I~Z 3/-a Al

b. Facility Reviewer () ~ s6T 01

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) - "'

d. NRC Regional Supervisor 5/

Note: "TThe faciliy reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence reauired.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8. Supplement 1 42 of 46 MAR-07-2002 10:48 6093393957 P. 02

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist

=Facility: go t>c Date of Exam: 3/[ - Exam Level:(R/S_'_O Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading I

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3. Applicants' scores checked tor addition errors (reviewers spot check > 259t of examinations) ____

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades arejustified

6. Performance on missed qudstions checked for training deficiencies and wording pr4blems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants __

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Grader ka*-, 1 - 3/k "7/0

b. Facility Reviewer(*) (Ike

.. 4-2t" 3/7 {

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*"-)] ,

d. NRC Supervisor (*) fA ~/..__

(°) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1