Text

Proposed License Amendments Regarding Control Room Ventilation System and Miscellaneous Minor Changes
	ML032680879
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	09/18/2003
From:	Jefferson W; Florida Power & Light Co
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	L-2003-199, NUREG-1432
	Download: ML032680879 (54)
	v • d • e

0 Florida Power & Ught Company, 6501 S.Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 FPL September 18, 2003 L-2003-199 10 CFR 50.90 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Proposed License Amendments Control Room Ventilation System and Miscellaneous Minor Changes Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) requests to amend Facility Operating Licenses DPR-67 and NPF-16 for St. Lucie Units I and 2. The proposed amendments revise the Technical Specification (TS) for control room ventilation systems to model the Combustion Engineering Standard Technical Specifications NUREG-1432 (CE STS). The change includes revising both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 control room ventilation system TS to replace detailed filter testing surveillance requirements with a requirement to test in accordance with the Ventilation Filter Testing Program.

In addition to the above changes, FPL proposes to revise Unit 1 and Unit 2 TS Table 3.3-6, Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation, in order to resolve minor inconsistencies that resulted from changes associated with TS Amendments 184 (Unit 1) and 127 (Unit 2). This change also proposes to correct some minor typographical errors.

Attachment 1 is a description of the proposed changes and the supporting justification.

Attachment 2 is the Determination of No Significant Hazards and Environmental Considerations. Attachments 3 and 4 are marked up copies of the proposed Technical Specification changes. Attachments 5 and 6 are copies of the retyped TS pages.

The St. Lucie Facility Review Group and the Florida Power & Light Company Nuclear Review Board have reviewed the proposed amendments. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 (b)(1), a copy of the proposed amendments is being forwarded to the State Designee for the State of Florida.

A-03 an FPL Group company

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Page 2 Approval of these proposed license amendments is requested within one year of submittal. Please issue the amendment to be effective on the date of issuance and to be implemented within 60 days of receipt by FPL. Please contact George Madden at 772-467-7155 if there are any questions about this submittal.

Willi Jr.

Vi ce rs id ent St. Lucie Plant WJ/GRM Attachments cc: Mr. William A. Passetti, Florida Department of Health

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Page 3 STATE OF FLORIDA )

) ss.

COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )

William Jefferson, Jr. being first duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Vice President, St. Lucie Plant, for the Nuclear Division of Florida Power &

Light Company, the Licensee herein; That he has executed the foregoing document; that the statements made in this document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge,, formation, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document n behalf of d Lice e.

WiT6 j(!q6n, Jr.

STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST LUCIE Sworn to and subscribed before me this ,8 day of . ,2003 by William Jefferson, Jr., who is personally known to me.

Name of Notary State of Florida Ksle MYMMU M=> 12 AMS may Z 2005

'0,S UUMJM MCsic (Print, type or stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public)

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 1 ATTACHMENT 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND JUSTIFICATION Introduction Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) requests to amend Facility Operating Licenses DPR-67 and NPF-16 for St. Lucie Units 1 and 2. The proposed amendments revise the Technical Specification (TS) for control room ventilation systems to model the requirements in the Combustion Engineering Standard Technical Specifications NUREG-1432 (CE STS). The change includes revising both the Unit I and Unit 2 control room ventilation system TS to replace detailed filter testing surveillance requirements with a requirement to test in accordance with the Ventilation Filter Testing Program.

In addition to the above changes, FPL proposes to revise Unit 1 and Unit 2 TS Table 3.3-6, Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation, to resolve minor inconsistencies that resulted from changes associated with TS Amendments 184 (Unit 1) and 127 (Unit 2),

which related to system operability requirements during the movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies. This change also proposes to correct some minor typographical errors.

BACKGROUND FPL determined that the assumptions made in the Unit 1 fuel handling accident (FHA) analysis that was used in support of recently approved TS changes related to the handling of recently irradiated fuel' did not properly reflect TS applicability requirements. The FHA analysis of record was documented and approved as part of TS Amendments 184 (Unit 1) and 127 (Unit 2). The FHA analysis assumes the control room ventilation system is operable and that within 30 minutes outside air intake will be isolated and the system switched to a filtered recirculation mode of operation.

Currently, the Unit I Technical Specifications have no requirement for control room ventilation operability in Modes 5 and 6, whereas the Unit 2 Technical Specifications have such a requirement. The Technical Specification changes proposed are required in order to ensure that FHA analysis assumptions regarding control room ventilation system operability remain valid.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CHANGES Unit I The following changes are proposed for Technical Specification 3/4.7.7.1, Control Room Emergency Ventilation System:

LCO applicability for Modes 5 and 6 and During movement of irradiated fuel assemblies" is being added.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 2

Actions for Modes 5 and 6 and "During movement of irradiated fuel assemblies" are being added.

Surveillance Requirements (SR) associated with ventilation filter testing are being replaced with a reference to the Ventilation Filter Testing Program.

SR 4.7.7.1 .a (verification control room air temperature <1200 F) is being deleted.

SR 4.7.7.1.e.3 is being revised to allow for conducting the control room pressure test on a staggered test basis.

The following changes are proposed for Table 3.3-6, Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation:

Applicability for the CIS monitor is being changed from Mode 6 to During movement of recenty irradiated fuel assemblies within containment."

Applicability for the fuel storage pool area ventilation system gaseous and particulate monitors is being changed from With irradiated fuel in the storage pool or whenever there is fuel movement within the pool or crane operation with heavy loads over the storage pool." to With recently irradiated fuel in the storage pool."

The following change is proposed for TS Section 6, Administrative Controls:

The Ventilation Filter Testing Program is being added as Section 6.8.4.k.

The following typographical error corrections are proposed:

For TS 3.4.1.4.1, an asterisk is being added to the LCO in reference to an existing footnote.

For TS 6.8.4.h.a, The Type B and C leakage rate acceptance criteria is being changed from <6.0 L. to 0.60 La.

Unit 2 The following changes are proposed for Technical Specification 3/4.7.7, Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System:

LCO applicability "During movement of irradiated fuel assemblies" is being added.

Mode 5 and 6 Actions are being modified to also apply "During movement of irradiated fuel assemblies."

For Action "a" under Modes 5 and 6 or during the movement of irradiated fuel assemblies, added "or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies" as an alternative action.

For Actions b" and c" under Modes 5 and 6 or during the movement of irradiated fuel assemblies, replaced "suspend core alterations or positive reactivity changes" with "suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies."

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 3

Surveillance Requirements (SR) associated with ventilation filter testing are being replaced with a reference to the Ventilation Filter Testing Program.

SR 4.7.7.a (verification control room air temperature <120 0F) is being deleted.

SR 4.7.7.e.3 is being revised to allow for conducting the control room pressure test on a staggered test basis.

The following changes are proposed for Table 3.3-6, Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation:

Applicability for the containment isolation monitor is being changed from Mode 6 to During movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies within containment."

Applicability for the fuel storage pool area ventilation system gaseous and particulate monitors is being changed from With irradiated fuel in the storage pool or whenever there is fuel movement within the pool or crane operation with loads over the storage pool." to With recently irradiated fuel in the storage pool."

Action Statement #24, which applies to the fuel storage pool area ventilation system gaseous and particulate monitors, is being changed to require the suspension of the movement of recently irradiated fuel in place of the requirement to suspend movement of fuel and suspension of crane operations with loads over the spent fuel storage pool.

The following change is proposed for TS Section 6, Administrative Controls:

The Ventilation Filter Testing Program is being added as Section 6.8.4.k.

The following typographical error corrections are proposed:

Item 2.1.1.2 (Peak Linear Heat Rate) is being deleted from the Index.

TS 3.9.8.2 LCO is being revised to change The independent shutdown cooling loops shall be OPERABLE. . ." to 'Two independent shutdown cooling loops shall be OPERABLE..."

JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE Control Room Ventilation LCO Applicabilitv For Unit 1, the LCO applicability is being expanded to include Modes 5 and 6 and during the movement of irradiated fuel assemblies. This change is more conservative than the existing Unit 1 TS, which has no applicability for these plant conditions. This addition is considered appropriate since the plant's fuel handling accident assumes the operability of the control room ventilation system. Details of the FHA were recently presented to and reviewed by the NRC as a part of TS Amendment 184.

For Unit 2, the LCO applicability currently includes Modes 5 and 6. This change will expand the applicability to include During the movement of irradiated fuel assemblies."

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 4 Like Unit 1, this addition is considered appropriate since the plant's fuel handling accident analysis assumes the operability of the control room ventilation system.

Details of the FHA were recently presented to and reviewed by the NRC as a part of TS Amendment 127.

The proposed changes to LCO applicability will make the Unit 1 and Unit 2 TS similar to the CE STS.

These changes are considered acceptable because they are consistent with the plant's design basis and accident analysis, they are conservative with respect to the current TS, and they are consistent with the CE STS.

Control Room Ventilation Actions - Modes 5 and 6 or During the Movement of Irradiated Fuel The current Unit 1 TS do not include any actions for these plant conditions; however, the most recent fuel handling accident (FHA), which evaluated the movement of recently irradiated fuel, assumes operability of the control room ventilation system. As such, it is appropriate for the TS to ensure that the system is operable in plant modes where irradiated fuel may be moved. Although the FHA evaluated recently irradiated fuel, the proposed change is more conservative in that it requires system operability for the movement of any irradiated fuel. The actions added for these plant conditions are modeled after the CE STS.

Currently, the Unit 2 TS include actions for Modes 5 and 6; however, the TS do not include actions applicable during the movement of irradiated fuel. As noted above for Unit 1, the FHA assumes operability of the control room ventilation system. As such, it is appropriate for the TS to ensure that the system is operable in plant modes where irradiated fuel may be moved. Although the FHA evaluated recently irradiated fuel, the proposed change is more conservative in that it requires system operability for the movement of any irradiated fuel. The actions have been slightly modified to be similar to those added for Unit 1 and with the CE STS.

These changes are considered acceptable because they are consistent with the plant's design basis and accident analysis, they are conservative with respect to the current TS and they are similar to the CE STS.

Deletion of Control Room Air Temperature Surveillance Unit 1 SR 4.7.7.1.a and Unit 2 SR 4.7.7.a both require verification every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months that control room air temperature is <1200F. This surveillance requirement is being deleted.

The basis for the deletion is that the surveillance does not appear in the CE STS.

Per the TS Bases (both units), operability of the control room ventilation system ensures that the ambient air temperature does not exceed the allowable temperature for continuous duty rating of the equipment and instrumentation cooled by this system, and

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 5 the control room will remain habitable for operations personnel during and following all credible accident conditions.

Because the control room is manned continuously, and because any increase in air temperatures that remotely approaches 1200F will be noticed by operators, the surveillance requirement is of no practical value. Should control room air temperatures increase significantly above their normal value, control room operators would generate a plant condition report to document the condition and to initiate corrective actions. It is reasonable to assume that this would occur well before the 1200 F limit is reached.

10 CFR 50.36 provides the regulatory basis for plant technical specifications. Per 50.36, technical specifications are required for items or parameters associated with a safety limit, limiting safety system setting, limiting control setting, or limiting condition for operation. The monitoring of control room air temperature does not meet any of these criteria.

These changes are considered acceptable since they are similar to the requirements in the CE STS, and because there is no 10 CFR 50.36 basis for such a surveillance.

Control Room Pressure Test on a Staaered Test Basis Unit 1 SR 4.7.7.1.e.3 and Unit 2 SR 4.7.7.e.3 currently require the control room pressure test be performed for both trains at least once per 18 months. The proposed change will allow for conducting this surveillance on a staggered test basis such that for each unit, one train will be tested at least every 18 months. Note that the definition of Staggered Test Basis" for the St. Lucie TS is slightly different than that found in the CE STS. As such, the surveillance interval proposed for this change is 36 months, which will thus require a train to be tested every 18 months. This results in the same testing frequency as that required by the CE STS.

As noted in the CE STS Bases, the frequency of [18] months on a staggered test basis is consistent with the guidance provided in NUREG-0800, Section 6.4.

This change is considered acceptable since it is consistent with the CE STS and the regulatory guidance of NUREG-0800.

Changes to Table 3.3-6. Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation As a result of the TS changes associated with recently issued Unit 1 TS Amendment 184 and Unit 2 TS Amendment 127, the LCO applicability associated with the containment isolation system (CIS) radiation monitors requires revision. The applicability is currently identified as Mode 6; however, the noted action is to comply with the action of TS 3.9.9 (Containment Isolation System), which was revised as a result of the noted amendments. The amendments changed the applicability of TS 3.9.9 to During the movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies within containment." Thus as it currently stands, the Mode 6 requirement for the CIS radiation

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 6 monitor is inconsistent with the TS requirement for containment isolation system operability. The proposed change (both units) is to revise the CIS radiation monitor "Applicable Modes" to During movement of recently irradiated fuel within containment."

Similarly, the applicability for the fuel storage pool ventilation system gaseous and particulate monitors requires revision. Unit 1 TS Amendment 184 revised the fuel handling building ventilation system LCO to only require operability "Whenever recently irradiated fuel Is in the spent fuel pool." Unit 2 TS Amendment 127 revised the shield building ventilation system (SBVS) TS LCO to only require Mode 5 and Mode 6 operability during movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies or during crane operations with loads over recently irradiated fuel assemblies in the spent fuel storage pool. Note that for Unit 2, the SBVS provides the credited ventilation of the spent fuel pool area. Based on the above, the proposed change is to revise the Applicable Modes" for the Unit 1 and Unit 2 fuel storage pool area ventilation system gaseous and particulate monitors to "With recently irradiated fuel in the storage pool."

These changes are considered acceptable because they resolve inconsistencies that were inadvertently established with the implementation of Unit 1 TS Amendment 184 and Unit 2 TS Amendment 127. With the proposed changes, the monitoring instrumentation will be required to be operable whenever the associated plant systems are required to be operable.

Ventilation Filter Testing Program Current plant TS surveillance requirements include details for the surveillance testing of the control room ventilation system filter trains, including details on testing frequency and filter performance requirements. The CE STS simplify these surveillance tests by referring to a Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP). The bases of the STS state, "The VFTP includes testing of HEPA filter performance, charcoal adsorber efficiency, minimum system flow rate, and the physical properties of the activated charcoal (general use and following specific operations). Specific test frequencies and additional information are discussed in detail in the VFTP."

The proposed change will delete surveillance requirements associated with the filter testing of the control room ventilation systems. With the noted exceptions below, the change is administrative in that there Is no change being proposed that would alter the current scope of ventilation system testing, the method of testing, or the established acceptance criteria. The deleted surveillance requirements are captured in the newly created VFTP. Note that Unit 2 Surveillance Requirements 4.7.7.c.1, Visual Examination, and 4.7.7.c.2, Airflow Distribution, are effectively deleted with this proposed change (there are no similar surveillance requirements in the Unit 1 TS). In NRC Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, the airflow distribution test is considered a post-maintenance test that is to be performed after maintenance affecting flow distribution. Also in RG 1.52, the visual examination is only required prior to the flow distribution test, which effectively makes the examination a part of the post-maintenance testing; and it is required as a prerequisite to the performance of in-place filter testing.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 7 Although not part of the VFTP as provided in the STS, these deleted TS Surveillance requirements will continue to be implemented via the plant procedure as part of the plant's UFSAR commitment to Reg. Guide 1.52 as documented in Unit 2 UFSAR Table 6.5-1.

The St. Lucie VFTP will be documented as a program in Section 6 of the TS and will be controlled via plant procedures. The plant procedure is the primary implementing document for the St. Lucie Unit 1 and Unit 2 surveillance testing of the control room ventilation systems' filters. This procedure currently includes the testing scope, methodology, frequency and acceptance criteria consistent with the current TS requirements.

The CE STS format captures ventilation filter testing for all TS-related ventilation systems within the VFTP. The current proposed VFTP for the St. Lucie TS only includes the control room ventilation systems; however, once the VFTP format is established in the TS, similar changes may be proposed in the future for other TS-related ventilation systems.

These changes are considered acceptable since they are similar to the requirements in the CE STS, and because there is no effective change in the testing methods, requirements, or acceptance criteria.

Correction of Tvoographical Errors Unit I TS 3.4.1.4.1 has a missing asterisk in the LCO. The asterisk should be there to refer to an existing footnote. The asterisk was unintentionally deleted during the electronic TS conversion process. The missing asterisk was not identified during proofreading of the converted TS. This electronic TS page was subsequently used for the TS markup that was ultimately issued with St. Lucie Unit 1 Amendment 179. As such, reinsertion of the asterisk is acceptable.

Unit 1 TS 6.8.4.h.a the acceptance criteria for the Type B and C leakage tests is incorrectly stated as <6.0 L8 the acceptance value should be <0.60 La. The error was introduced in License Amendment 149. FPL letter L-96-244, for the containment leakage rate testing program, proposed the acceptance value to be <0.60 L, however on February 10, 1997 when the revised TS page was issued with the typographical error, the acceptance value was <6.0 La. Plant procedures contain the correct value of

<0.6 L. CR 03-3131 was written to document the TS error.

Unit 2 TS Page III (Index) identifies Section 2.1.1.2, PEAK LINEAR HEAT RATE, as being on Page 2-1. Section 2.1.1.2, along with the associated index listing, was deleted in St. Lucie Unit 2 Amendment 105; however, prior to the NRC's issuing of Amendment 105, FPL submitted another proposed license amendment (PLA) via letter L-2000-160 that also affected Page 1II. This later PLA Included a version of Page III that included the listing for Section 2.1.1.2. The NRC subsequently issued St. Lucie Unit 2

St. Lucie Units and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 1 Page 8 Amendment 117 that unintentionally reinserted the index listing for Section 2.1.1.2. As such, deletion of Section 2.1.1.2 from the Index is acceptable.

Unit 2 TS LCO 3.9.8.2 reads "The independent shutdown cooling loops shall be OPERABLE. . ." The original wording of this LCO is "Two independent shutdown cooling loops shall be OPERABLE. . . The "Two" was inadvertently changed to "The" during the electronic TS conversion process and was not identified during the proofreading process. This page, with the typographical error, was subsequently issued in Amendment 122. As such, changing uThew to Two" is acceptable.

Note - Condition Report 02-0098 was written to document TS errors originating from the electronic conversion process.

Applicable Regulatorv Requirements/Criteria NUREG-1432, Standard Technical Specifications Combustion Engineering Plants, is, by definition, endorsed by the NRC. The Preface to this NUREG states that "Licensees are encouraged to upgrade their technical specifications consistent with those criteria and conforming, to the practical extent, to Revision 2 to the improved STS."

Conclusions The proposed changes are acceptable. Adoption of the CE STS format for the control room ventilation systems results in improved technical specifications that are more up to date with the latest regulatory guidance and it provides consistency between the two units. Although the control room ventilation filter testing surveillances are being removed from the individual TS, the creation of the new VFTP adequately captures the testing requirements in a format that has been accepted by the NRC via the CE STS.

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 2 Page 1 ATTACHMENT 2 DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION Introduction Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) requests to amend Facility Operating Licenses DPR-67 and NPF-16 for St. Lucie Units 1 and 2. The proposed amendments revise the Technical Specification (TS) for control room ventilation systems to a format similar to the Combustion Engineering Standard Technical Specifications NUREG-1432 (CE STS) in order to achieve similarity between the two units. The change includes revising both the Unit I and Unit 2 control room ventilation system TS to replace detailed filter testing surveillance requirements with a requirement to test in accordance with the Ventilation Filter Testing Program. This change adopts the format similar to that used in the CE STS.

In addition to the above changes, FPL proposes to revise Unit 1 and Unit 2 TS Table 3.3-6, Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation, in order to resolve minor inconsistencies that resulted from changes associated with TS Amendments 184 (Unit 1) and 127 (Unit 2), which related to system operability requirements during the movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies. This change also proposes to correct some typographical errors.

Determination of No Significant Hazards Consideration The standards used to arrive at a determination that a request for amendment involves a no significant hazards consideration are included in the Commission's regulation, 10 CFR 50.92, which states that no significant hazards considerations are involved if the operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. Each standard is discussed as follows:

(1) Operation of the facility In accordance with the proposed amendments would not Involve a significant Increase In the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

The proposed changes to the St. Lucie Unit 1 & 2 Technical Specifications will adopt the format of the NUREG-1432 Combustion Engineering Standard Technical Specifications for the Unit 1 control room emergency ventilation system and the Unit 2 control room emergency air cleanup system. Additionally, the Ventilation Filter Testing Program of the CE STS is being adopted for the aforementioned ventilation systems. No changes are being made to the methods of testing, testing scope, or acceptance criteria.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 2 Page 2 The proposed changes also correct mode applicability requirements for the containment isolation radiation monitor (both units) and the fuel storage pool gaseous and particulate monitors (both units). These corrections are necessary in order to restore consistency with related technical specification requirements for the containment isolation system and associated fuel pool area ventilation systems.

The equipment and systems involved are associated with accident mitigation.

The surveillance testing of this equipment has no bearing on the initiation of an accident previously evaluated nor on the probability of any accident previously evaluated.

Implementing the proposed changes does not significantly increase the consequences of an accident previously evaluated. The performance requirements and acceptance criteria for the affected ventilation systems are not being changed. The ability of the affected systems to mitigate the effects of postulated accidents is not diminished by the proposed changes.

The changes being proposed do not affect assumptions contained in the plants' safety analyses or the physical design of the plants, nor do they affect other technical specifications that preserve safety analysis assumptions. Therefore, operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendments would not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed.

(2) Operation of the facility In accordance with the proposed amendments would not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.

The proposed amendments do not involve any changes to the operation or performance requirements of the affected systems, nor do they involve the addition or modification of any plant equipment. As such, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.

(3) Operation of the facility In accordance with the proposed amendments would not Involve a significant reduction In a margin of safety.

The margin of safety as defined by 10 CFR Part 100 has not been significantly reduced. There will be no decrease in the ability of the affected systems to perform their intended safety functions as assumed in accident analyses. The proposed changes do not alter the bases for assurance that safety-related activities are performed correctly or the basis for any Technical Specification related to the establishment of or maintenance of a safety margin.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 2 Page 3 Based on the above, we have determined that the proposed amendments do not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated, or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety; and therefore does not involve a significant hazards consideration.

Environmental Impact Consideration Determination The proposed license amendments change requirements with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part

20. The proposed amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts and no significant change in the types of any effluents that may be released off-site, and no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. FPL has concluded that the proposed amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and therefore, meet the criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need not be prepared in connection with issuance of the amendments.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 1 ATTACHMENT 3 ST. LUCIE UNIT I MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES TS Pages 3/4 7-20 314 7-21 3/4 7-22 3/4 7-23 3/4 3-22 6-15b 6-15c 3/4 4-1 d

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 2 i3t7. cNTROL ROh EMERGENMENA1ONMM Tha coiuol roo mmarency eilat~nyse ahal be OPRBIE£ J. IK_,

3*.¶ :

a. TwbSteraIns.

-b. Tisvolaioahes iech dsd kkx'a ut

,..cI6 soion -ve I thetoile area air exhaUstduct,

.d. One fitetrl e.A.lasttwo^o gt nft5S1

f. oMno2 vos4nthae-84!w 1"6ict Al k one'WSWea, per, WUlt O ts w*nT ayi2e iviast HOt STANDSYtin the nx 6 hnur nd CO tDWin he oT 3o r

h. With on isaton vae;d-ir diQctIoable,¢Jen matoinue.

SHTDW th HQT$TANDB at lest dbherdse, bkiiA~it*iH rE. ihS t6 m -i an IC;

.o.~~SOhus

c. Wih the Altar ran ioperable, rostare h I-.ertkto OPERA4BL aUS wltt~n 24 beu4 pr belr at beast HOT $TANDBY~MII1In i ~he tiot ;6 ho- send In COLD)SHUTDWN vbth~n he q following S oodlln its toyOfEBstatu : vfhi 7 dea r h~ at host HOT.

$TANDY h- the ni6 hoursan XL~HT COL Wthnhe 1ooing SOhoin~ "

%4 ^ Z .- e o 8T LUCIEtlTl :^W :740

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 3 INSERT 1

a. With one booster fan inoperable, restore the inoperable fan to OPERABLE status within 7 days or initiate and maintain operation of the remaining OPERABLE control room emergency ventilation system in the recirculation mode or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

b. With one isolation valve in an air duct inoperable, maintain the other isolation valve in the same air duct closed or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

c. With the filter train inoperable, suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

d. With only one air conditioning unit OPERABLE, restore at least two air conditioning units to OPERABLE status within 7 days or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 4 PLANIT SYSTEMS S VEJILLANCE REQUIREMENTS_

4.7.7.1 The control room emergency ventilation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At lcast onoz per 12 hourS by VOrifW1ing that thF rocm-8otrol Ra tlmprature Is o '20o .

-.b At least once per 31 days by:

1. Initiating flow through the HEPA filter and charcoal adsorber train and verifying that each booster fan operates for at least 15 minutes.

2. Starting (unless already operating) each air conditioning unit and verifying that It operates for at least 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months .

e itAleast Knee per 10 months or (1) a.mftr. y,trudw rnain-tonono _n the H_PA AFd e h e d br d r

42) fllev&n poiRtn, Gfr orchemical rolcoc in eny venti 4ati9on :one eemAnicoting vit4 the e)yotem b~y:

1. Verifying that the charcoal adsorbers remove > 99% of logenated hydrocarbon refrigerant test gas when y atested in-place in accordance with ANSI N51 975 whlu operating the ventilation system at a flow e of 2000 + 10%.

2. Verifying th the HEPA filter banks remo > 99% of the DOP when th are tested In-place In cordance with ANSI N510-1975 whil perating the ventil ion system at a flow rate of 2000 +/-10%.

3. Verifying that a borat an sis of a carbon sample from either at least one test can r or at least two carbon samples removed from o o he charcoal adsorbers demonstrates a removal efficiency of 7.5% r radioactive methyl iodide when the sam e Is ted iccordance with ASTM D3803-198 30 0C, 70% RH). e carbon samples not obtained from te canisters shall be pr red by either:

a) Emptyj gone entire bed fom a remov adsorber tray ixing the adsorbent thoroughly, an btaining pies at least two Inches In diameter and a ngth equal to the thickness of the bed, or 13Y 4rjA'6&/ A endment No. 16 ST.LUCIE UNIT 314 7-21 Amnendment No.

167

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 5 PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued) b) Emptying a longitudinal sample from an adsorber tray, mixing the adsorbent thoroughly, and obta g samples at least two inches in diameter and wit a length equal to the thickness of the bed.

4. Ve ng a system flow rate of 2000 cfm+t10%d ing system operation when tested In accordance ANSI N510- 75.

d. After every 72 ours of system operation by eith

1. Verifying th a laboratory analysis of a cai n sample obtained a test canister demonstrat a removal efficiency of 7.5% for radioactive meyl iodide when the sample Is ed in accordance ASTM D3803-1989 (30°C. 70% R) r

2. Verifying that a labatc 1ysist at least two car-bon samples demontra emoal efficiency of > 97.5% I for radioactive methyl ,her the samples are tested in accordance with AS Iq -1989 (30°C, 70% RH) and I the samples are prepare znthen a) Emptying o from a removed adsorber tray, mixing it thoroughly, and obtaining samples at ies Indiameter and with a length equa ss of the bed, or b) Emptying a longjtudinal saIle from an adsorber tray, mixing ethqdsorbent th roughly, and obtaining samples at Ia t two inches iameter and with a length equalo the thickness a he bed.

Subsequent to rinstalling the adsorbe ray used for obtaining the rbon sample, the syste be demonstrat-1hall ed OPERAB by also: -

a) Var' g that the charcoal adsorbers r move > 99%

of a logenated hydrocarbon refngera test gas wh n they are tested in-place in accorda ce with A SI N510-1975 while operating the vention stem at a flow rate of 2000 cim +/- 10%t a b) Verifying that the HEPA filter banks remove 9%

of the DOP when they are tested in-place in a rdance with ANSI N510-1975 while operating the ventil on system at a flow rate of 2000 cfm +/- 10%.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT I 3/4 7-22 Amendment No. 167

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 6 PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Continued)

C-e At least once per 18 months byf 1.. that nugii the pre t~ire d&op aao..ss te~combain I EPA

fitor l .dcharcoal odsorber Pbnis Is 1.16 inehec Water Cauge while eperating the ventilatbn system at a

-flow rate of 2060J cn +/- 0%i.

-. verifying that on a containment isolation signal the system automatically Isolates the control room within 35 seconds and switches into a recirculation mode of operation with flow through the HEPA fiters and charcoal adsorber banks.

DA Ie fw OVl

,j*, w

-. OWIA..s 016 q

-8r Ikerifyng thatk.thoAeysem malntains the ontrol room at a positive pressure > 1/8 Inch W.G. relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation with < 450 dcm outside air Intake.

f. er each complete or partial replacement of a HEPA filz

/ ~~bagbverifying that the HEPA fifter banks remov -19% of the DOP n they are tested in-place In accg nce with ANSI

/ ~~N510-1:75 wi rating the venlatio tM at a flow

/ ~~rate of 2000 dfm +/- 0

g. After each complete or pa m ent of a charcoal adsorber bank by ve g that the I adsorbers remove a 99% of a hal ted hydrocarbon refrig test gas when they are te in-place in accordance with ANSI 1975 while ratng the ventilation system at a flow rate of I 2*f+1~0%.

do- 4 14 Aed epie Pt, so "-4hs $'Me sr kfa Wry ST. LUCIE -UNIT 3/4 7-23 Amendment No. 33, 57

TABLE 3.3-6 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ag C

Xo ffi MINIMUM CHANNELS APPLICABLE ALARM MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT OPERABLE MODES SETPOINT RANGE ACTION .0

1. AREA MONITORS

a. Fuel Storage Pool Area I 5 15 mR/hr 10 -e1 mRihr 13

!A.M

b. Containment (CIS) 3 < 90 mR/hr 1 - 105 mR/hr 16 0C

c. Containment Area - Hi 1 1 23 & 4 < 10 Rhr ' -10' R/hr 15 Range (D

2. PROCESS MONITORS

a. Containment

i. Gaseous Activity I 1, 23&4 NotApplicable 10 _106 CpMn 14 I RCS Leakage Detection II. Particulate Activity I 1, 23&4 NotApplicable 10-106 cpm 14 RCS Leakage Detection

b. Fuel Storage Pool Area Ventilation System

i. Gaseous Activity I ****

10 - 105 CVcc 12 ii. Particulate Activity 1 ***

1 - 0 cpm 12 d-roe 4l

With uel in the storage pool or building.

' Withirradiated fuel In the storage pool or wheno.or thoris fuel movement vithin the peel or MM

The Alarm Setpoints are determined and set in accordance with requirements of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

,J" -d,,£n b tew.f If J4*& . -a aseus4ms .gJA: an.

ST. WCIE - UNIT 3/4 3-22 Amendment No. 69, 423,134

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 8 ADMNISAI COTOLS (2)conform to the guidance of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50, and (3) Include the following:

1) Monitoring, sampling, analysis, and reporting of radiation and radionuciides in the environment Inaccordance with the methodology and parameters Inthe ODCM.

2) ALand Use Census to ensure that changes Inthe use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the monitoring program are made If required by the results of this census, and

3) Participation in a Interiaboratory Comparison Program to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive materials Inenvironmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring.

h. Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program A program to Implement the leakage rate testing of the containment as required by 10 CFR 50.54(o) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix J, Option B, as modified by approved exemptions. This program is Inaccordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide 1.163, Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program,* as modified by the following exception(s):

a) Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-I orANS 56.8-1994 (as recommended by R.G. 1.163) wAl be used fortype A testing.

b) The first Type A test performed after the May 1993 Type A test shall be no later than May 2008.

The peak calculated containment Internal pressure for the design basis loss of coolant accident Pg. is 39.6 pslg. The containment design pressure is 44 psig.

The maximum allowed containment leakage rate, L, at Pa. shall be 0.50% of containment air weight per day.

Leakage rate acceptance criteria are: R O

a. Containment leakage rate acceptance crit on Is c 1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in aance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are for the Type B and Ctests,

< 0.75 La for Type A tests, and c 0.27 for secondary containment bypass leakage paths.

b. Air lock testing acceptance criteria are:

1) Overall air lock leakage rate Is_ 0.05 La when tested at > Pa.

2) For the personnel air lock door sea, leakage rate is c 0.01 La when pressurized to ' 1.0 Pa.

3) For the emergency air lock door seal, leakage rate is < 0.01 La when pressurized to > 10 psig.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 1 6-15b Amendment No. 60, 86. 43a,440,

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 9 AOMINISIRATIV CONTROLS conluecl The provisions of T.S. 4.0.2 do not apply to test frequencies In the Containment Leak Rate Testing Program.

The provisions of T.S. 4.0.3 are applicable to the Containment Leak Rate Testing Program.

I. Inservice Testina Prooram This program provides controls for inservice testing of ASME Code Class 1 2 and 3 components (pumps and valves). The program shall Include the following:

a. Testing frequencies specified In Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code' and applicable addenda as follows:

ASUE Boler and PressureVessel Code' and applicable Addenda terminology for Required Frequencies for performing Inservice testing activities inservice testing activities Weekly At least once per 7 days Monthly At least once per 31 days Quarterly or every 3 months At least once per 92 days Semiannually or every 6 months At least once per 184 days Every 9 months At least once per 276 days Yearly or annually At least once per 366 days Biennially or every 2 years At least once per 731 days

b. The provisions of Specification 4.0.2 are applicable to the above required frequencies for performing Inservice testing activities;

c. The provisions of Specification 4.0.3 are applicable to nservice testing activities; and

d. Nothing In the ASME Boler and Pressure Vessel Code* shall be construed to supersede the requirements of any technical specification.

J. Technical Soecifications (TS) Bases Control Program This program provides a means for processing changes to the Bases of these Technical Specifications.

1. Changes to the Bases of the TS shall be made under appropriate administrative controls and reviews.

2. Licensees may make changes to Bases without prior NRC approval provided the changes do not require either of the following:

a. a change in the TS Incorporated In the license; or

b. a change to the updated UFSAR or Bases that requires NRC approval pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59.

3. The Bases Control Program shall contain provisions to ensure that the Bases are maintained consistent with the UFSAR.

4. Proposed changes that meet the criteria of Specification 6.8.4.j.2.a or 6.8A.2.b. above, shall be reviewed and approved by the NRC prior to Implementation. Changes to the Bases implemented without prior NRC approval shall be provided to the NRC on a frequency consistent with 10 CFR 50.71(e).

Where ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Is referenced It also refers to the applicable portions of ASMEIANSI OM-Code, Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants, with applicable addenda, to the extent it Is referenced in the Code.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 6-15C Amendment No. 440, 463, 176

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 10 INSERT 2

k. Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP)

A program shall be established to implement the following required testing of Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) filter ventilation systems at the frequencies specified in Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2.

1. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an inplace test of the high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters shows a penetration and system bypass < 1% when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Ventilation 2000 + 200 cfm

2. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an inplace test of the charcoal adsorber shows a penetration and system bypass < 1% when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Ventilation 2000 + 200 cfm

3. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that a laboratory test of a sample of the charcoal adsorber, when obtained as described in Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, shows the methyl iodide penetration less than the value specified below when tested in accordance with ASTM D3803-1989 at a temperature of 300C and the relative humidity specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Penetration RH Control Room Emergency Ventilation <2.5% 70%

4. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers is less than the value specified below when tested at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Delta P Flowrate Control Room Emergency Ventilation <4.15" W.G. 2000 + 200 cfm The provisions of SR 4.0.2 and SR 4.0.3 are applicable to the VFTP test frequencies.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 3 Page 11

.COLDS HUTDOWiN - LOOPS FLLEW

pStd:1w t shtdnwoiglopu.lb OERABL an

?~~d Othern JL. Oi i:itiaiO o cooing op sbi e RLE r

. The eeoondary dde werle,,td t hast tw seam generators sha begrearin IOc~ w ae l Mom

-8PtiCA iLt: MIOOE 5*i~ ratols lopfaU

a. Vehlss uta Thebv iw loos0¢ OPRALEorwi iess tiar therequird ait oe ofwtthfn one (1)hourtWats c ,Po s0bo toeshxn.* rd loos OEMSE tatus orSo restorWe tiHquTDNlL - : i-

b. WU n o cog loopeon,Suspend eatns hat wu i rired toiet sUTQUI&ARGIN Tedicat Specficton .. tZ nd :

wtiione gl) ho rk tiatcird acion to retrihe reqird s~townop:

=109~~~~~~~~~~~fb~o '.

~IJRVF11I AWC~ I~FO T. . . .

4.1.4.1 Te*codi 't wa t e t t-sftwetsr'gneat enue shat be denIedt tlTh l id es -fs~one per 1:2 h.

operation andIcltn ioroutuz* ptleasfone pei IZ ou

' T' S'tdw coln ^i may'be ne~.n for P koI o 1roi -'d il no oeaon are ppntd tha v*uC cause lotducdon into th S.: otn lth oro cnonb6n .

less Thn wequred to meett SHUTDOWN.MA131N df TcnlcS~lat$p 3.1 .t2anld

eie cuiet tenpwrtie Is rnianea l 1 b tWiotion t*pbi

nShztdwo oinplo a b-e bripto horsunrsa

kA eeadorcootat pump shl not be strd it :twMSldJoops wulss the ...

f theatoroly~en*'rutreF A14 44d 5rUJc-witri K4Ot 5144M

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 1 ATTACHMENT 4 ST. LUCIE UNIT 2 MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES TS Pages 3/4 7-17 3/4 7-18 3/4 7-19 3/4 3-25 3/4 3-27 6-15d INDEX iii 3/4 9-9

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 2 PLANT SYSTEMS 3X4.7.7 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCYVENTILATION SYSTEM LIMNO CNDIN WE OPERTON 3.7.7.1 The control room emergency ventilation system shall be OPERABLE with:

a. Two booster fans,

b. Two Isolation valves Ineach outside air Intake duct,

c. Two isolation valves in the toilet area sir exhaust duct,

d. One filter train,

e. At least two air conditioning units, and

f. Two Isolation valves Inthe kitchen area exhaust duct.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1,2,344, S,_' 6 QV4 (W-,l.5 Mo ut *. ,J:,Iga *.s ACTION: /

a. With one booster fan Inoperable, restore the Inoperable fan to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be In at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and In COD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

b. With one Isolation valve per air duct Inoperable, operation may continue provided the other Isolation valve in the same duct is maintained closed; otherwise, be Inat least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and In COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

c. With the filter train Inoperable, restore the filter train to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or be In at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

d. With only one air conditioning unit OPERABLE, restore at least two air conditioning units to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

~~*7o2Z;4~wAl4st5 ST. LUCIE - UNIT I 314 7-20 Amendment No. 160

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 3 PLANT SYSTEMS SVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.7 Each control room emergency air cleanup system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At at 8nGG PeF 12 hcUrG by,V'zrFWOAO fl t zGFntr8l r9oo aIF lemponttxo iD so 4;v At least once per 31 days by (1)Initiating, from the control room, flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the system operates for at least 15 minutes and (2)starting, unless already operating each air conditionina unit and verifvlna that it onerates for at least 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months .

. lekbast once per 18 months or (1)after any structural maintenance on th H filter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2)following painting, firer che I release Inany ventilation zone communicating with the sys by:

1. Pe ing a visual examination of CREACS In accordan ANSI 1 0-1980.

2. Performing flow distribution to HEPA filters and rcoal adsorbers in accordance w ANSI N-510-1980. The distributi shall be +/- 20% of the average flow pe nit.

3. Verifying that the chal adsorbers re y 99.95% of a halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant st gas when th are tested in accordance with ANSI N-510-1980 while rating the stem at 2000 cfm + 10%.

4. Verifying that the HEPA fiters e > 99.95% of the DOP when they are tested In accordance with N-510-1980 while operating the system at 2000 cfm 10%.

5. Verifying a system flow e of 2000 cfm_0%.

d. After every 720 hours0.00833 days 0.2 hours 0.00119 weeks 2.7396e-4 months of acoal adsorber opera by verifying within 31 days after removal t a 4-inch laboratory sample em the Installed sample canisters demonstrat a removal efficiency of > 99.82 for methyl Iodide when tested In a dance with ASTM D3803-1989 (30 C% RH). I

e. At least once 18 months by

1. Vea ng that the pressure drop across the combined prefilters EPA filrs and charcoal adsorber banks Is less than 7.4 inches Water auge ile operating the system at a flow rate of 2000 cfm 10%.

vT. sUE - UNITo 2

\ '"oJ4S4 #e"

n ' "Ci w Ad-18A# A' A n

_ Anmn Re v. No.0 S~ 7 p a t o%

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 314 -18 Amendment No. 107

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 4 PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

C 4 kc4 4fc Pe- IC IAx¢ ty f- Verifying that on a containment Isolation test signal from Unit 2, the system automatically switches Into a recirculation mode of operation with flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks.

3. Xerifying tha4 ~te ma n s e control room at a positive pressure of greater than or equal to 1/8 inch Water Gauge relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation with 5450 cfm outside air Intake.

/ 4: Verifying that on a containment isolation test signal from Unit I the system automatically switches Into a recirculation mode of operation with flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks.

f. ch complete or partial replacement of a HEPA filter bank verifyin the HEPA filter banks remove greater than ojiu to 99.95% f th when they are tested i-place rdancor with ANSI N-510-19 Ru prating the syst rlow rate of 2000 cfm +/- 10%. \

g. After each complete or p r t of a charcoal adsorber bank by verifying rcoal adso move greater than or equal $i aoenated hyd oabnrant test gas when ar teedIn-place n acoorae wih AN510-1980 Ope~rating the system at a flow rate of 200cfM + 10 d 4 l CAM pa- 36 "AA"a R5rbRrA 7An.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 3/4 7-19

'co n TABLE 3.3-6 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION o

MINIMUM CHANNELS APPLICABLE ALARMITRIP MEASUREMENT 0. WlC INSTRUMENT OPERABLE MODES SETPOINT RANGE ACTION

1. AREA MONITORS

a. Fuel Storage Pool Area (D I. Criticality and 4

c 20 mR/hr 1O -04 mR/hr 22 Ventilation System Isolation Monitor (I)co

b. Containment Isolation 3 v < 90 mR/hr 1 - 107 mR/hr 25

c. Control Room Isolation l per ALL MODES c 2x background 1e-10 Clcc 26 intake 7

d. ContainmentArea-Hi 1 1,2,3&4 NotApplicable 1-10'R/hr 27 Range

2. PROCESS MONITORS

a. Fuel Storage Pool Area Ventilation System

i. Gaseous Activity 1 ***** - _10-2 RCt cc 24 ii. ParticulateActivity 1 ** ***6 cpm 24

b. Containment I. Gaseous Activity RCS Leakage Detection I

1 1 2 2

&4 NotApplicable lo'- le pCVcc 23 II. Particulate Activity 1 1, 2 3 & 4 Not Applicable 1 -10 6 cpm 23 RCS Leakage Detection Withyuel in the storage pool or building.

- Withtirradlated fuel In the storage pool or AAonevor there is fuel mevefflet witth p 'r ioA-

-With borCIA oQWF th Storage P98!.

The AlarmITrip Setpoints are determined and set in accordance with requirements of the Offslte Dose Calculation Manual. I ST. LUCIE -UIT2 314 3-25 Amendment No. 26,61

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 6 TABLE 3.3-6 (Continued)

ACTION STATEMENTS -

ACTION 22 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, perform area surveys of the monitored area with portable monitoring instrumentation at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

ACTION 23 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, comply with the ACTION requirements of Specification 3.4.6.1.

ACTION 24 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, suspend all operations Involving movement ofuel within the spent fuel storage pool.

and Aror-e epeF-AmtAR6zo-h Ic r:aor the cPonRt fuel rterage pee.

ACTION 25 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, comply with the ACTION requirements of Specification 3.9.9.

ACTION 26 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirements, within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months Initiate and maintain operation of the control room emergency ventilation system in the recirculation mode of operation.

ACTION 27 - With the number of OPERABLE Channels less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, either restore the inoperable Channel(s) to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months , or.

1) Initiate the preplanned alternate method of monitoring the appropriate parameter(s), and

2) Prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within 14 days following the event outlining the action taken, the cause of the inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 314 3-27 Amendment No. 73

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 7 ApMINISTRATI CONTROLS (continued_

J. Technical Soecifications TS) Bases Control Prooram This program provides a means for processing changes to the Bases of these Technical Specifications.

1. Changes to the Bases of the TS shall be made under appropriate administrative controls and reviews.

2. Licensees may make changes to Bases without prior NRC approval provided the changes do not require either of the following:

a. a change Inthe TS Incorporated In the cense; or

b. a change to the updated UFSAR or Bases that requires NRC approval pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59.

3. The Bases Control Program shall contain provisions to ensure that the Bases are maintained consistent with the UFSAR.

4. Proposed changes that meet the criteria of Specification 6.8A.1.2.a or 6.8.4.J.2.b, above, shall be reviewed and approved by the NRC prior to implementation. Changes to the Bases Implemented without prior NRC approval shall be provided to the NRC on a frequency consistent with 10 CFR 50.71(e).

roA)SCT 1]

ST. LUCIE -UNIT 2 6-15d Amendment No. 117

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 8 INSERT I

k. Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP)

A program shall be established to implement the following required testing of Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) filter ventilation systems at the frequencies specified in Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2.

1. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an inplace test of the high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters shows a penetration and system bypass < 0.05% when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup 2000 + 200 cfm

2. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an inplace test of the charcoal adsorber shows a penetration and system bypass < 0.05% when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup 2000 + 200 cfm

3. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that a laboratory test of a sample of the charcoal adsorber, when obtained as described in Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, shows the methyl iodide penetration less than the value specified below when tested in accordance with ASTM D3803-1989 at a temperature of 300C and the relative humidity specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Penetration RH Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup <0.175% 95%

4. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers is less than the value specified below when tested at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Delta P Flowrate Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup <7.4" W.G. 2000 + 200 cfm The provisions of SR 4.0.2 and SR 4.0.3 are applicable to the VFTP test frequencies.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 9 INDEX EA= Li M AND _MMNOSAETYTEStN PAGE 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS 2.1.1 REACTOR CORE .................................................... ................. 2-1 2.1.1. I DNBR, I.................................................................................................................... - I

.2-1AK........................................

2.1.

2.1.2 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE ............................. 2-1 2.2 LIMNG SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.2.1 REACTOR TRIP SETPOINTS ........................... 2-2 ST. LUCIE - UNrr 2 III Amendnent No. 4097

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 4 Page 10 REFUELING OPERAMONS LOW WATER LEVEL

_sMDU_

3:.9.8.2 p49nepndent shutdown cooling loops shall be OPERABLE and at least one shutdown cooling shall be Inoperation.

APPLICABILITY: MODE 6 when the water level above the top of the reactor pressure vessel flange is less than 23 feet.

ACTION:

a. With less than the required shutdown cooling loops OPERABLE, within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months Initiate corrective action to return the required loops to OPERABLE status, or to establish greater than or equal to 23 feet of water above the reactor pressure vessel flange, as soon as possible.

b. With no shutdown cooling loop Inoperation, suspend operations that would cause introduction Into the RCS. coolant with boron concentration less than required to meet the boron concentration of Technical Specification 3.9.1 and within 1hour Initiate corrective action to return the required shutdown cooling loop to operation. Close all containment penetrations providing direct access from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

SURVILLANCE R__IREMLE J 4.9.8.2 At least once per 12 hour1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months s:

a. At least one shutdown cooling loop shall be verified to be In operation.

b. The total flow rate of reactor coolant to the reactor pressure vessel shall be verified to be greater than or equal to 3000 gpm.*

The reactor coolant flow rate requirement may be reduced to 1850 gpm Ifthe following conditions are satisfied before the reduced requirement Is Implemented: the reactor has been determined to have been subcritical for at least 125 hours0.00145 days 0.0347 hours 2.066799e-4 weeks 4.75625e-5 months , the maximum RCS temperature s : 1170F, and the temperature of CCW to the shutdown cooling heat exchanger Is c 87°F.

ST. LUCIE - Mt 2 314 9 ST.LUCIE-UNN2 No. ~~~Aiendmert 9-948. 60.

314 ;g42-

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 1 ATTACHMENT 5 ST. LUCIE UNIT I RETYPED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES The attached retype reflects the currently issued version of the Technical Specifications.

Pending Technical Specification changes or Technical Specification changes issued subsequent to this submittal are not reflected in the enclosed retype. The enclosed retype should be checked for continuity with Technical Specifications prior to issuance.

TS Page 3/4 7-20 3/4 7-21 3/4 7-22 3/4 7-23 3/4 3-22 6.15b - (Also changed by PLA L-2003-224) 6-15d 3/4 4-1 d

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 2 PLANT SYSTEMS 314.7.7 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM LIMMITNG CONDTON FOR OPERATION 3.7.7.1 The control room emergency ventilation system shall be OPERABLE with:

a. Two booster fans,

b. Two Isolation valves In each outside air intake duct,

c. Two isolation valves in the toilet area air exhaust duct,

d. One filter train,

e. At least two air conditioning units, and

f. Two solation valves in the kitchen area exhaust duct.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3,4, 5 and 6 or during movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

ACTION:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4:

a. With one booster fan inoperable, restore the Inoperable fan to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

b. With one Isolation valve per air duct inoperable, operation may continue provided the other isolation valve In the same duct is maintained closed; otherwise, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

c. With the filter train inoperable, restore the filter train to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

d. With only one air conditioning unit OPERABLE, restore at least two air conditioning units to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be In at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and In COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 314 7-20 Amendment No. 460,

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 3 PLANT SYSTEMS ACTION: (continued)

MODES 5 and 6 or during movement of irradiated fuel assemblies:

a. With one booster fan noperable, restore the inoperable fan to OPERABLE status within 7 days or nitiate and maintain operation of the remaining OPERABLE control room emergency ventilation system in the recirculation mode or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

b. With one isolation valve in an air duct inoperable, maintain the other Isolation valve Inthe same air duct closed or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

c. With the filter train Inoperable, suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

d. With only one air conditioning unit OPERABLE, restore at least two air conditioning units to OPERABLE status within 7 days or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

SUREILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.7.1 The control room emergency ventilation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At least once per 31 days by:

1. Initiating flow through the HEPA filter and charcoal adsorber train and verifying that each booster fan operates for at least 15 minutes.

2. Starting (unless already operating) each air conditioning unit and verifying that it operates for at least 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months .

b. By performing required control room emergency ventilation system filter testing in accordance with the Ventilation Filter Testing Program.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 314 7-21 Amendment No. 4.,

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 4 PLANT SYSTEMS SURYEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)_

DELETED ST. LUCIE - UNIT 314 7-22 Amendment No. 46,

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 5 PLANT SYSTEMS SV EILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

c. At least once per 18 months by verifying that on a containment isolation signal the system automatically Isolates the control room within 35 seconds and switches into a recirculation mode of operation with flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks.

d. At least once per 36 months on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS by verifying that one control room emergency ventilation train maintains the control room at a positive pressure > 1/8 Inch W.G. relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation with < 450 cfm outside air intake.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT I 3/4 723 Amendment No. 33, a,

r3 0 n 0

C- a f-TABLE 3.- .C RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION D ED MINIMUM CHANNELS APPLICABLE ALARM MEASUREMENT SETPOINT RANGE ACTION CD INSTRUMENT OPERABLE MODES

1. AREA MONITORS CDI0 C.

a. Fuel Storage Pool Area 3

k" 515 mR/hr 10' - 04 mR/hr 13 0 )

CD 0

b. Containment (CIS) 3 c 90 mRihr 1-105 mR/hr 16 I 1 1, 2,3, & 4 c 10 R/hr 1 10 R/hr 15 (a

c. ContainmentArea-.HI Range

2. PROCESS MONITORS

a. Containment 1,2, 3 & 4 Not Applicable 10- 106 cpm 14

i. Gaseous Activity 1 RCS Leakage Detection 1 1. 2,3 & 4 Not Applicable 10 - 106 cpm 14 II. Particulate Activity RCS Leakage Detection

b. Fuel Storage Pool Area Ventilation System I -_ 10-lCcc 12 I. Gaseous Activity 1

1- 108 cpm, 12 ii. Particulate Activity With fuel In the storage pool or building.

I

- With recently Irradiated fuel in the storage pool.

-- The Alarm Setpoints are determined and set in accordance with requirements of the Offsfte Dose Calculation Manual.

During movement of recently Irradiated fuel assemblies vithin containment.

3/4 3-22 Amendment No. 69,423. 4a4, ST. LUCIE -UNIT

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 7 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (2)conform to the guidance of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50, and (3) include the following:

1) Monitoring, sampling, analysis, and reporting of radiation and radionuclides in the environment in accordance with the methodology and parameters Inthe ODCM.

2) A Land Use Census to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census, and

3) Participation in a nterlaboratory Comparison Program to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive materials in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring.

h. Containment Leakaae Rate Testing Proaram A program to implement the leakage rate testing of the containment as required by 10 CFR 50.54(o) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix J, Option B. as modified by approved exemptions. This program is in accordance with the guidelines contained InRegulatory Guide 1.163, Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program,' as modified by the following exception(s):

a) Bechtel Topical Report, BN-TOP-1 or ANS 56.8-1994 (as recommended by R.G. 1.163) will be used for type A testing.

b) The first Type A test performed after the May 1993 Type A test shall be no later than May 2008.

The peak calculated containment Internal pressure for the design basis loss of coolant accident Pa, is 39.6 psig. The containment design pressure Is 44 psig.

The maximum allowed containment leakage rate, La, at Pa, shall be 0.50% of containment air weight per day.

Leakage rate acceptance criteria are:

a. Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion s c 1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are < 0.60 La for the Type B and Ctests,

< 0.75 La for Type A tests, and _ 0.27 La for secondary containment bypass leakage paths.

b. Air lock testing acceptance criteria are:

1) Overall air lock leakage rate is 0.05 La when tested at > Pa.

2) For the personnel air lock door seal, leakage rate is c 0.01 La when pressurized to > 1.0 Pa.

3) For the emergency air lock door seal, leakage rate is < 0.01 La when pressurized to > 10 psig.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT I 6-15b Amendment No. , 86, 42a,44, 4P.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 8 AflMTNISTRATIVE CONTROLS {continued)

k. Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP)

A program shall be established to implement the following required testing of Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) filter ventilation systems at the frequencies specified in Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2.

1. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an nplace test of the high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters shows a penetration and system bypass I 1%when tested In accordance with ANSI N510-1975 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Ventilation 2000 +/- 200 cfm

2. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an Inplace test of the charcoal adsorber shows a penetration and system bypass c 1%when tested Inaccordance with ANSI N510-1975 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Ventilation 2000 + 200 cim

3. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that a laboratory test of a sample of the charcoal adsorber, when obtained as described in Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, shows the methyl Iodide penetration less than the value specified below when tested In accordance with ASTM D3803-1989 at a temperature of 300C and the relative humidity specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Penetration RH Control Room Emergency Ventilation <2.5% 70%

4. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers Isless than the value specified below when tested at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Delta P Flowrate Control Room Emergency Ventilation 4.15 W.G. 2000 +/- 200 cfm The provisions of SR 4.0.2 and SR 4.0.3 are applicable to the VFTP test frequencies.

6.9 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ROUTINE REPORTS 6.9.1 Inaddition to the applicable reporting requirements of Tite 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following reports shall be submitted to the NRC.

STARTUP REPORT 6.9.1.1 A summary report of plant startup and power escalation testing shall be submitted following (1)receipt of an operating license, (2)amendment of the license Involving a planned Increase In power level, (3)installation of fuel that has a different design or has been manufactured by a different fuel supplier, and (4)modifications that may have significantly altered the nuclear, thermal or hydraulic performance of the plant.

ST. LUCIE -UNIT 1 6-15d Amendment No. 46,

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 5 Page 9 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM COLD SHUTDOWN - LOOPS FILLED LIMJING CONDl1ON FOR OPERATiON 3.4.1A.1 At least one shutdown cooling loop shall be OPERABLE and in operations and either

a. One additional shutdown cooling loop shall be OPERABLE?, or

b. The secondary side water level of at least two steam generators shall be greater than 10% of narrow range Indication.

APPLICABILITY: MODE 5 with reactor coolant loops filled#.

ACTION:

a. With less than the above required loops OPERABLE or with less than the required steam generator level, within one (1) hour initiate corrective action to return the required loops to OPERABLE status or to restore the required level.

b. With no shutdown cooling loop in operation, suspend operations that would cause introduction into the RCS; coolant with boron concentration less than required to meet SHUTDOWN MARGIN of Technical Specification 3.1.1.2 and within one (1) hour initiate corrective action to return the required shutdown loop to operation.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.1A.1.1 The secondary side water level of at least two steam generators when required shall be determined to be within limits at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

44.1.4.1.2 At least one shutdown cooring loop shall be determined to be in operation and circulating reactor coolant at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

The shutdown cooling pump may be de-energized for up to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months provided 1) no operations are permitted that would cause Introduction Into the RCS, coolant with boron concentration less than required to meet the SHUTDOWN MARGIN of Technical Specification 3.1.1.2 and

2) core outlet temperature Is maintained at least 10°F below saturation temperature.

One shutdown cooling loop may be Inoperable for up to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months for surveillance testing provided the other shutdown cooling loop is OPERABLE and in operation.

1. A reactor coolant pump shall not be started with two idle loops unless the secondary water temperature of each steam generator is less than 30°F above each of the Reactor Coolant System cold leg temperatures.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 314 4-1d Amendment No. G6, 9S, 403. 49.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 1 ATTACHMENT 6 ST. LUCIE UNIT 2 RETYPED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES The attached retype reflects the currently issued version of the Technical Specifications.

Pending Technical Specification changes or Technical Specification changes issued subsequent to this submittal are not reflected in the enclosed retype. The enclosed retype should be checked for continuity with Technical Specifications prior to issuance.

TS Page 3/4 7-17 3/4 7-18 3/4 7-19 3/4 3-25 3/4 3-27 6-15d 6-15e INDEX iii 3/4 9-9

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 2 PLANT SYSTEMS 314.7.7 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY AIR CLEANUP SYSTEM (CREACS)

LIMiTINGCQNDITION FOR OPERAllON 3.7.7 Two independent control room emergency air cleanup systems shall be OPERABLE with:

a. A filter train and its associated fan per system, and

b. At least one air conditioning unit per system, and

c. Two isolation valves in the kitchen area exhaust duct, and

d. Two solation valves in the toilet area exhaust duct, and

e. Two solation valves in each (North and South) air intake duct.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 or during movement of Irradiated fuel assemblies.

ACTION:

MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4:

a. With one control room emergency air cleanup system inoperable, restore the Inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be In at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

b. With both control room emergency air cleanup systems Inoperable, restore at least one system to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

c. With an solation valve In an air Intake duct or air exhaust duct inoperable, operation may continue provided the other Isolation valve in the same air Intake or air exhaust duct is maintained dosed; otherwise be in at least HOT STANDBY In the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months .

MODES 5 and 6 or during movement of Irradiated fuel assemblies:

a. With one control room emergency air cleanup system Inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 7 days or Initiate and maintain operation of the remaining OPERABLE control room emergency air cleanup system In the recirculation mode or suspend movement of Irradiated fuel assemblies.

b. With both control room emergency air cleanup systems inoperable, suspend movement of Irradiated fuel assemblies.

c. With an isolation valve in an air intake duct or air exhaust duct Inoperable, maintain the other Isolation valve in the same air intake or air exhaust duct dosed or suspend movement of irradiated fuel assemblies.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 34 7-17 Amendment No. 422,

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 3 PLANT SYSTEMS SUREILLANCE EQUIREMENTS 4.7.7 Each control room emergency air cleanup system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At least once per 31 days by (1) initiating, from the control room, flow through I the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the system operates for at least 15 minutes and (2) starting, unless already operating each air conditioning unit and verifying that it operates for at least 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months .

b. By performing required control room emergency air cleanup system filter testing inaccordance with the Ventilation Filter Testing Program. I ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 3/4 7-18 Amendment No. 40a,

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 4 PLANT SYSTEMS SUREILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (CPntinudLh

c. At least once per 18 months by:

1. Verifying that on a containment Isolation test signal from Unit 2, the system automatically switches into a recirculation mode of operation with flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks.

2. Verifying that on a containment isolation test signal from Unit I the system automatically switches into a recirculation mode of operation with flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks.

d. At least once per 36 months on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS by.

1. Verifying that one control room emergency air cleanup system train maintains the control room at a positive pressure of greater than or equal to 1/8 Inch Water Gauge relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation with c 450 cfm outside air intake.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 314 7-19 Amendmnent N.

0 r" TABLE 3.346 (D e RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION

_0 C MINIMUM Z A CHANNELS APPLICABLE ALARMITRIP MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT OPERABLE MODES SETPOINT RANGE ACTION

1. AREA MONITORS .

a. Fuel Storage Pool Area a.) 0 I. Criticality and 4 5 20 mRlhr 10 1 - 10 4 mR/hr 22 CD0)

C)

Ventilation System n LA.

Isolation Monitor - o 0)

b. Containment Isolation 3 **90 mR/hr 1 - 107 mR/hr 25 I

c. Control Room Isolation 1 per ALL MODES c 2x background 10 -10 lCVcc 26 intake

d. Containment Area - Hi 1 1, 2,3 &4 Not Applicable 1 - id7R/hr 27 Range

2. PROCESS MONITORS

a. Fuel Storage Pool Area Ventilation System

. Gaseous Activity 1 **

10 7 2 ACVcc 24 Dl. Particulate Activity 1 1 - lo6 cpm 24

b. Containment I. Gaseous Activity i 1, 2,3 & 4 Not Applicable 10 -10 tCVcc 23 RCS Leakage Detection Ii. Particulate Activity RCS Leakage Detection I 1,2,3 & 4 Not Applicable 1 - 106 cpm 23 With fuel in the storage pool or building.

With recently rradiated fuel In the storage pool. I The Alarm/Trip Setpoints are determined and set In accordance with requirements of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

During movement of recently Irradiated fuel assemblies within containment ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 314 3-25 Amendment No. 25, U.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 6 TABLE 3.3-6 Continued)

ACTION STATEMENTS ACTION 22 - Wth the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, perform area surveys of the monitored area with portable monitoring Instrumentation at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

ACTION 23 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, comply with the ACTION requirements of Specification 3.4.6.1.

ACTION 24 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, suspend all operations involving movement of recently Irradiated fuel within the spent fuel storage pool.

ACTION 25 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, comply with the ACTION requirements of Specification 3.9.9.

ACTION 26 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirements, within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months initiate and maintain operation of the control room emergency ventilation system in the recirculation mode of operation.

ACTION 27 - With the number of OPERABLE Channels less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, either restore the Inoperable Channel(s) to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months , or

1) Initiate the preplanned alternate method of monitoring the appropriate parameter(s), and

2) Prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.92 wIthin 14 days following the event outlining the action taken, the cause of the Inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status.

ST. LUCIE - UNI 2 3/4 3-27 Amendment No. ;3,

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 7 ADMINISTRIVE CONTROLS (continued)

Technical Specifications (TS) Bases Control Program This program provides a means for processing changes to the Bases of these Technical Specifications.

1. Changes to the Bases of the TS shall be made under appropriate administrative controls and reviews.

2. Ucensees may make changes to Bases without prior NRC approval provided the changes do not require either of the following:

a. a change in the TS Incorporated in the license; or

b. a change to the updated UFSAR or Bases that requires NRC approval pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59.

3. The Bases Control Program shall contain provisions to ensure that the Bases are maintained consistent with the UFSAR.

4. Proposed changes that meet the criteria of Specification 6.8.4.J.2.a or 6.8.4.J.2.b, above, shall be reviewed and approved by the NRC prior to Implementation. Changes to the Bases implemented without prior NRC approval shall be provided to the NRC on a frequency consistent with 10 CFR 50.71(e).

k. Ventilation Filter Testina Program (VFTP)

A program shall be established to Implement the following required testing of Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) filter ventilation systems at the frequencies specified in Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2.

1. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an nplace test of the high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters shows a penetration and system bypass < 0.05% when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup 2000 +/- 200 cfm

2. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that an nplace test of the charcoal adsorber shows a penetration and system bypass 1 0.05% when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Flowrate Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup 2000 +/- 200 cfm

3. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that a laboratory test of a sample of the charcoal adsorber, when obtained as described in Regulatory Guide 1.52. Revision 2.

shows the methyl iodide penetration less than the value specified below when tested In accordance with ASTM D3803-1989 at a temperature of 300C and the relative humidity specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Penetration RH Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup 1 0.175% 95%

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 6-15d Amendment No. 44,

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 8 ADmiNISTRsTIVE CONTROLS (continued)

k. Ventilation Filter Testing Proaram (VFTP) (continued)

4. Demonstrate for each of the ESF systems that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers is less than the value specified below when tested at the system flowrate specified below.

ESF Ventilation System Delta P Flowrate Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup < 7.4" W.G. 2000 +/- 200 cfm The provisions of SR 4.0.2 and SR 4.0.3 are applicable to the VFTP test frequencies.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 6-15e Amnendment No.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 9 INDEX SAFgT LIMITS AND LIMING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS SECTION PAGE 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS 2.1.1 REACTOR CORE. 2-1 .

2.1.1.1 DNBR. 2-1 .

2.1.1.2 DELETE I 2.1.2 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2-1 .

2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.2.1 REACTOR TRIP SETPOINTS.................................... 2-2 ...............................

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 III Amendment No. 45, 44.

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2003-199 Attachment 6 Page 10 REFUELING OPERATIONS LOW WATER LEVEL LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERAllON 3.9.8.2 Two independent shutdown cooling loops shall be OPERABLE and at least one shutdown cooling shall be in operation.

APPLICABILITY: MODE 6 when the water level above the top of the reactor pressure vessel flange Isless than 23 feet.

ACTION:

a. Wth less than the required shutdown cooling loops OPERABLE, within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months initiate corrective action to return the required loops to OPERABLE status, or to establish greater than or equal to 23 feet of water above the reactor pressure vessel flange, as soon as possible.

b. With no shutdown cooling loop in operation, suspend operations that would cause Introduction into the RCS, coolant with boron concentration less than required to meet the boron concentration of Technical Specification 3.9.1 and within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months initiate corrective action to return the required shutdown cooling loop to operation. Close all containment penetrations providing direct access from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

SUMEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.9.8.2 At least once per 12 hour1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months s:

a. At least one shutdown cooling loop shall be verified to be in operation.

b. The total flow rate of reactor coolant to the reactor pressure vessel shall be verified to be greater than or equal to 3000 gpm.*

The reactor coolant flow rate requirement may be reduced to 1850 gpm if the following conditions are satisfied before the reduced requirement Is Implemented: the reactor has been determined to have been subcritical for at least 125 hours0.00145 days 0.0347 hours 2.066799e-4 weeks 4.75625e-5 months , the maximum RCS temperature is 17 0F, and the temperature of CCW to the shutdown cooling heat exchanger is < 870F.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 314 99 Amendment No. 46, 60, 6. 422,

L-2003-199, Proposed License Amendments Regarding Control Room Ventilation System and Miscellaneous Minor Changes

Text

Navigation menu

L-2003-199, Proposed License Amendments Regarding Control Room Ventilation System and Miscellaneous Minor Changes

Text

Navigation menu

Search