L-10-043, Submittal of Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report, 2009

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submittal of Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report, 2009
ML100630417
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/01/2010
From: Allen B
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-10-043
Download: ML100630417 (7)


Text

FENOC 5501 North State Route 2 FirstEnergyNuclear Operating Company Oak Harbor,Ohio 43449 Barry S. Allen 419-321-7676 Vice President- Nuclear Fax: 419-321-7582 Iaf6b0J3 2010 10 CFR 26.717 (e)

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Docket Number 50-346, License Number NPF-3 Annual Fitness-For-Duty Report, 2009 In accordance with 10 CFR 26.717(e), FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) hereby submits the Fitness-For-Duty (FFD) Annual Performance Data for the period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (DBNPS).

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Dale R. Wuokko, Manager, Site Regulatory Compliance, at (419) 321-7120.

Sincerely, Barry S. Allen

Enclosure:

Fitness for Duty Program Annual Performance Data cc: NRC Region III Administrator NRC Resident Inspector NRR Project Manager Utility Radiological Safety Board

Enclosure L-10-043 Page 1 of 6 Fitness for Duty Program Annual Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 FirstEnercqy Nuclear Operatingq Company December 31, 2009 Company 12 Months Ending Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Location Mark A. Hoffman, Supervisor, Nuclear Access (419) 321-7338 Contact Name Phone (include area code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)

Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 Cocaine 300 /150 Phencyclidine 25/25 Opiates 2000 / 2000 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04 6-AM/ 10 -After 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 0.03

-After 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 0.02 Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Average Number subject to Part 26 822 97 throughout the period Categories of tests conducted throughout # # # #

the period Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 108 1 189 1 Post accident 3 0 1 0 For Cause 2 0 0 0 Random (53.9% of population) 448 0 48 0 Follow-up 54 0 10 1 Other 3 0 0 0 Total 618 1 248 2

Enclosure L-10-043 Page 2 of 6 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Amphe- Phency- Refusal Marijuana Cocaine Opiates tamines clidine Alcohol to Test Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Contractors 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

Enclosure L-10-043 Page 3 of 6 Summary of Management Actions Taken and List of Fitness For Duty Event Reports From January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS) Fitness for Duty (FFD) records indicate the following results:

Licensee Employees For licensee employees, one licensee candidate tested positive for alcohol in the pre-access category. The individual was denied unescorted access. All other categories for Licensee employees resulted in no other confirmed positives.

Pre-Access The individual tested positive for alcohol during the pre-access test and was denied unescorted access. The individual was not offered employment for the position of Nuclear Security Officer and did not exercise the right to an appeal process.

Contractors For contractors, one individual was confirmed positive for a single substance and was denied unescorted access for a minimum five years. A second contractor did not provide a pre-access drug screen within a three hour timeframe and was permanently denied unescorted access for refusal to test.

Follow-up Catecqory Individual's first unacceptable drug screen result was in 1990. The individual returned to the nuclear industry in 2004. The individual's pre-access test was returned favorably and the individual was added back into the Follow-up Program. However, the individual was never tested in follow-up program due to the short timeframe at the facility (two weeks). When the individual returned to nuclear industry again in 2009, the pre-access was returned favorably and the individual was added back into the Follow-up program. Prior to providing the individual a protected area badge, the individual was collected for the first follow-up test which was confirmed positive for cocaine. This individual was denied unescorted access for a minimum five years. The individual is currently in the appeal process.

Enclosure L-1 0-043 Page 4 of 6 Pre-Access Individual attempted three times to provide urine specimen and was unsuccessful. The individual was informed of the "shy bladder" process in accordance with 10 CFR 26.119 which was initiated. To date FENOC has not heard from the subject regarding any evaluation. Individual is permanently denied unescorted access for refusal to test.

List of Events Reported No Fitness for Duty events were reported under the provisions of 10 CFR 26.417 (b) (2) by the DBNPS during the reporting period of January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009.

(0 o- C ProtectingPeople and the Environment CD 1 0 x",

U.S.NRC 0)

%, CD

-E-i-ect-ro-n-i-c-l-nfo-rm.at-il-o- -Exchange-NRC FFD Program Performance Data Reporting System 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Managing Fatigue Annual Fatigue Reporting Form SelectFacility Pang 7009 Use Adobe Reader9.3 for thisform to workproperay.

Dacig-Besse Wasthis facilityin an outagefor any perdof the reportingperiod?(Yes I NO)

IN.

5ummary of Waiver Issuance - 26.203(e)(1)(i-ii)

Number of Waivers Issued [Note: Ee~ ifno waivers were issued please entera at.e. (e.g., 0) in leaft .f ne of the cells in this lable]

+ Operafing F Operathngor oe-sitedirecting of Performing health physicsor Perioming duties ofa firebrigade Perforring maintenanceor Pearforing se-crityduties. as Operating Outage the operndomof syslemsuas cbernishty duuies.as describedin member,as described in msitedirectionofmaienafnce. dascribed in Total TOtal described in26.4(a)(1) 26.4(aX2) 26.4(aX3) as describedin26.4(a)(4) 26.4(a)(5) (days 1-0E)

WorkHourControls Oeaig outage Operating Outage Oeaig Ourtage O (daoys I-0) (Calculated) (Calcudated)

Operating I(doag 1e0) I Operatig (days 1.60) 1 Operating (days 1.60) r Operatieg (days "-60) it 0dg u

Exceeded 16work hrs in any 24hr period 0.

DailyWoW Fol fl Hours Exceeded 26workhrs in any48 ir period Ol 26.205(dx))

Exceeded 72work hrs in any 7 day period I0 ]

0O F0- FO Rest Less than 10 hr break bit successive work paraeds (or hr break acconrnrodating 0M FO-FO-7 Breaks scheduledtransitionIonMitts) 26.205(d)(2)

Less than 34 hr break in any eday period IoZi]

0o-it U Fo--7] 0o Averageofless than I day off per week Eil ]

FoU- FO-0o -

for 8-tour shifts Aamge ofless than 2 days off pecweek FO-]

FO-- [0-]

0o --

FO U 0^ t Minimum Days PerShift for 10-hou shifts Armge M., of foess for 12-hour shirts thae.2.5day. offperweek E ]

K,:U: El]-1 FO-]

Cyde 262055dX3) Averageof lessthan 2 days off pmrweek for 12-iour nraictenance shifts Avenageofless than 3 days off parweek ECl]

for t2-hour security shifts Less mtan3 days off per successive 15-day Ai r DaysOf period 26.205.(d)(4) or Dutage icliuilies(duringfist Less than 1 dayeor per 7-dayperiod for i0 daysofcutage) tnaintenance personnl 26.205.(d)(4) lRý.255(ditd),and 65d Less Ran4 days off per successihe1r-day peorid for security personnel 26.205.(d)(5)

Total EZZ

- NOTE.ForindividualsperformingfSrebrigadeduties and otherduries, pleass count heomonlyucder the fin adeCOlumn. Do notdouble count these indl'das

-al-rm (0 00 CD 1 o 6 (on

-4 CD 0)

Distributionof Waivers for Individuals in Each Category- 26.203(e)(1)(iii) I Summary of CorrectiveAction - 26.203(e)(2) (as applicable)I Number of Employees Issued Waivers

[Note: Even ifno waivers were issued for a given column, please enter a value (e.g., 0) in at least one of the cells in the column] FAalysis of Waiver Assessment Data: (Limit 10,0000 -h)rctersl Davis Besse did not waive the fatigue requirements for any individual during this reporting period. Review of documentation did produce Operating or on-site Performing health Performing duties of a Performing maintenance Performing security severaldeviations from the regulation requirements. These deviations have been captured in the corrective action program.

directing of physics or chemistry fire brigade member as or onsite directing of duties as described in the operations of duties as described in described in maintenance as de systems, as 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(3) described in 26.4(a)(4) 26.4(a)(5) described in 26.4(a)(1) o -------- ---- Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data: (Livit 10,t00chutaae.)

I I 1111a;*- -

I 8 I Total1 Emloee 10__

11-20 I-Summary and Status of Corrective Actions: (Limit 10,000cuarauctim)

More than 20 Totat Emptoyees Isud Waivers

___Lteutated) 1Ei oE li Most Waivers Single Individual NOTE: For indivduals performing firebigade duties and other duties, please count them only under the fire fiigade column. Do not double count these individuals.

I I