IR 07100116/2012011
| ML18005A362 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris, 07100116  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1988 |
| From: | Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18005A361 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-87-41, NUDOCS 8803160350 | |
| Download: ML18005A362 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE I NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Harris Docket No. 50-400 License No.
NPF-63 During the Nuclear Regulatory Cormission (NRC)
inspection conducted on November 16 - December ll, 1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforce-ment Actions,"
CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:
CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria III, as implemented by the CPSL accepted gA program (FSAR Chapter 17.2) requires that changes to design inputs be identified, approved, documented and controlled.
Contrary to the above, the design input for the change in temperature (WT)
value used in evaluating thermal stresses in the containment building riser structure in calculation LV-66 was changed from 148'F to 60'F.
The value of WT
= 148'F was the design input value based on DBA temperature used in calculation of thermal stresses affecting reactor building steel structures.
The reasons for change to this design input was not identified, and the change was not approved, documented or controlled.
As a result, calculation LV-66 required revisions to incorporate the correct design input value for WT of 148'.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Harris, within
days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation]:
( I) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps whi'ch will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
If an adequate reply is not'eceived within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to sh'ow'"cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why,'. s'uch other action as may be proper should not be taken.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 88QS>~0~~
pp04C)0 SO22>
PDR ADOCK 0 pDR e'ated at Atlanta, Georgia this day of 1988 Alan R. Herdt, Chief Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety