IR 05000566/1979003
| ML19274E741 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yellow Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/15/1979 |
| From: | Bryant J, Vallish E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19274E740 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-566-79-03, 50-566-79-3, 50-567-79-03, 50-567-79-3, NUDOCS 7904240238 | |
| Download: ML19274E741 (4) | |
Text
-@
UNITED STATES
- 8 #800g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[
o,'o
'
+
.
REGION 11
- , t 101 MARIETTA STREET. N.W.
k ATLANTA. GEORCI A 30303
s,...../
Report Nos.
50-566/79-03 a-50-567/79-03 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Tower II Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 Facility Name: Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-566 and 50-567 License Nos.
CPPR-172 and CPPR-173 Inspection at Yellow reek Site near luka, Mississippi Inspectcr: b /t [
7- / V-7 9 E. J. Vallish Date Signed f
Approved by: '(., h (u m c,, _
J[5 79 J. C. Bryant,\\Sectiot Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on February 13-15, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 16 inspector-hours on-site in the areas of progress of construction of reactor and turbine generator buildings, of the construction plant, QA implementing procedures of containment steel structures and supports and other safety-related structures, structural steel and supports.
Results Of the five areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
'790d24oa3g
.
o
.
s DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees M. M. Price, Project Manager
- L. S. Cox, Coa-+*uction Engineer
- C. G. Wages, Aa,1stant Construction Engineer, QC
- S. G. Carr, Assistant Construction Engineer, Project Engineering
- J. N. Holladay, Project QA Unit Supervisor
- Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 15, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above. The licensee was informed that no noncompliances or new unresolved items were identified.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort - Units 1 and 2 This effort included the progress of construction of the reactor and turbine generator buildings, and the construction plant and storage of supplies and equipment in the lay-down areas.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Containment (Steel Structures and Supports) - Review of QA Implementing Procedures - Units 1 and 2 The following documentation was reviewed which assures the requirement and control of QC or work p eformance procedures in accordance with applicable codes and standards and specifications for witnessing or inspection, receiving inspections to assure conformance to purchase requirements, cleanliness, protection, packaging, reports, segregation of materials, storaga identification and storage and issuance records:
.
-2-a.
" Containment Vessel Construction Sequence" TVA drawing IRE 0353-R6-14 R2 b.
" Containment Vessel General Elevation Sections", TVA drawing IRE 0353-R6-01 R1 c.
" Containment Vessel Erect Contractor Area Location Plan", TVA drawing IRE 0353-R6-15 R1 d.
Construction Engineering Procedure (CEP) 5.01 R5, " Quality Control Instructions, and Receiving Inspections, Storage, and Preventative Maintenance Instructions" CEP 5.04 R1, " Work Packages" e.
f.
Contract File " Containment Vessel"- Chicago Bridge and Iron Company (CBI), 822043-1 JUnit 1) and 822043-2 (Unit 2)
g.
CBI Contract QA Handbook titled " Yellow Creek Contract 74201/4 Nuclear Contract Handbook" h.
CBI procedure DC 2N R1 titled " Field Dimensional Control Procedure -
Nuclear Containment Vessel" i.
Quality Control Instruction (QCI) No. M-290 R0, titled " Inspection of Contractor Activities -Containment Vessel Erection at YCNP" The reviewed contractural documents indicate that TVA will supply the containment shell conceptional design to CBI and CBI will design, furnish, fabricate, examine, shop clean, shop paint, deliver, unload, field assemble, erect, inspect, test, clean and paint both containment shells.
.
CBI will furnish QC thru all stages in accordance with ASME Section III, Article NA-4000 and Subarticle NA-3700; Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and applicable NRC Guides and ANSI Standards of the N45.2 series.
An inspection report from the TVA Quality Engineering Branch of January 24, 1979, indicated that 10% of the #2 course shell plates were fabricated at the CBI Birmingham, Alabama plant and that the materials for only the bottom head and #1 and #2 course plates were received for the Unit I shell. The report indicated that 12, #2 course plates were scheduled for shipping to the site February 24, 1979.
No items ^. noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-.
~
.
.
-3-7.
Safety Related Structures (Structural Steel & Supports) Review of QA Implementing Procedures - Units 1 and 2 Documentation which requires the performance of witnessing or inspection at hold points, receiving inspections for damage, product conformance to procurement specifications, cleaniness and protection specifications and proper reporting of receipt inspections were reviewed.
Inspection and installation procedures cover:.ng type, size and tolerances of fittings, nondestructive testing and records of installation were also reviewed.
The documents and procedures reviewed were:
a.
QCI No. C-301 R4, " Structural Steel Structural and Miscellaneous Steel Fabrication b.
QCI No. C-302 R2, " Structural Steel Field Erection and Shop Assemblies (bolted joints)"
CEP 8.01 R2, " Identification and Marking of Materials, Parts and c.
Components" d.
CEP 7.02 R3, " Receiving Inspection" e.
CEP 10.01 R0, " Inspection" f.
CEP 13.01 R1, " Handling of Nuclear Components" g.
CEP 13.02 R0, " Storage and Preservation of Materials, Components and Systems" h.
CEP 13.03 R0, " Warehouse Storage Area Inspection" No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-
.-
..