IR 05000528/1996020
| ML20140E148 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20140E146 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-528-96-20, 50-529-96-20, 50-530-96-20, NUDOCS 9704250101 | |
| Download: ML20140E148 (2) | |
Text
-.
.
- _ _.
_ _ _ =
_..- -
_ _.. _-
-.
- _. _.
.
-
.
.
.
.
i ENCLOSURE i
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J
REGION IV-
Docket Nos:
50-528, 50-529, 50-530 License Nos.:
NPF-41, NPF-51, NPF-74 Report No.:
96-20 l
Licensee:
Arizona Public Service Company Facility Name:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 location:
Wintersburg, Arizona
,
Dates:
October 7-11, 1996 Inspectors:
A. B. Earnest, Physical Security Specialist
,
Plant Support Branch R. Rosano, Physical Security Specialist Safeguards Branch, NRR Accompanied By:
D. Nebuda, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Omaha, Nebraska
!
Approved By:
Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety f
ATTACHMENT: Supplemental Information I-l
!
,
.
DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS j
PAGE lS DECONTROLLED
'
9704250101 970131 PDR ADOCK 05000528 G
.. - _ -. - -
.-
..
. _ _.
.
-
.
.
<
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 & 3 NRC Inspection Report 50-528/96-20, 50-529/96-20, and 50/530/96-20 Plant Support i
This was a special, announced inspection of the licensee's vehicle barrier system (VBS) program utilizing Temporary Instruction 2515/132(MalevolentUse Of Vehicles At Nuclear Power Plants), dated January 18, 1996.
Three unresolved items were identified involving the VBS (Section 51.1).
- The bomb blast analysis was completed in accordance with the NRC
recommended model. The licensee has maintained the required documentation of the analysis.
The measurement distances used in the calculations appeared to be accurate (Section S1.2).
'
An excellent security procedure was in place to compensate for, conduct
surveillances of, and maintain the VBS. (Section SI.3).
"
An excellent records and reports system had been implemented
(Sections 2.1).
Quality assurance audits provided excellent oversight of security
activities. In addition, the security department's internal self-l assessments were a significant program strength (Section S2.2).
A State-of-the-art communications capability that performed well during
the inspection, had been installed (Section S2.3).
A unresolved item was identified regarding a 10 CFR 50.54(p) submittal
(Sections 2.4).
l
1 DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS
, UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE lS DECONTROLLED
.
d d