IR 05000454/1982007
| ML20053D814 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 05/19/1982 |
| From: | Forney W, Hayes D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053D808 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-454-82-07, 50-454-82-7, 50-455-82-05, 50-455-82-5, NUDOCS 8206070346 | |
| Download: ML20053D814 (4) | |
Text
..
..-. - - _
_
.
-
-
- -
.. -
i
.
<
.
l
.I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Reports No. 50-454/82-07(DPRP); 50-455/82-05(DPRP)
Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 Licenses No. CPPR-130; CPPR-131
,
Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company c
Post Office Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name: Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Byron Site, Byron, IL f
Inspection Conducted: March 22 through April 30, 1982 8/
B 2__
Inspector:
W. L T e
/
Approved By:
D.
ayes, Ch'ie
/7 82-
.
'
'
~ Reactor Projects Section IB
!
M pection Summary J
Inspection on March 22 through April 30, 1982 (Reports No. 50-454/82-07(DPRP);
50-455/82-05(DPRP))
Areas Inspected: Routine safety inspection to review preoperational test activities, IE Circulars, and other activities. The inspection involved a total of 52 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector including eight inspector-hours onsite during off-shifts.
Results: Of the three areas inspected no items of noncompliance were identified in two areas. One item of noncompliance was identified in the
j other area.
I
i i
J
!
,
i
,
8206070346 820519 PDR ADOCK 05000454 G
-
.
...., _., _. _ _ _ _ _ _, _.-__ _..
-.. -.
. -
.-.
~.
.
..
-
-
._
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Commonwealth Edison Company
- V.
I. Schlosser, Project Manager G. Sorensen, Project Construction Superintendent R. Tuotken, Assistant Project Superintendent, PCD R. B. Klingler, Quality Control Supervisor J. Binder, Lead Electrical Engineer, PCD C. Tomashek, Lead Startup Engineer
- R. Querio, Station Superintendent
- R. Ward, Station Assistant Superintendent for Administration and Support
- R. Pleniewicz, Station Assistant Superintendent for Operations
-
L. Sues, Station Assistant Superintendent for Maintencnce F. Willich, Station Quality Assurance
- D.
St.
Clair, Technical Staff Supervisor A. A. Jaras, Project 0.A.D. Supervisor F. A. Hornbeak, Assistant Technical Staff Supervisor, Startup A. C. Chomacke, Assistant Technical Staff Supervisor
- T. E. Didier, Quality Control Supervisor
- J.
R. VanLaere, Rad Chem
- P. Nodzenski, Quality Assurance
- Denotes personnel at exit interview.
2.
Pre-operational Test Program a.
The inspector observed portions of the performance test of Emergency Diesel lA Preoperational Test 2.22.10.
The inspector observed briefings, conduct of the test, observation of precautions, calibration and placement of test instrumenta-tion, documentation of results and unusual events / deficiencies.
The inspector observed during performance of test Section 9.12 that personnel were not properly briefed, procedural requirements were not being followed, procedures were not being maintained at test control stations, that watch reliefs were not adequate, and that data was not being properly recorded. This item appears to be contrary to the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and Commonwealth Edison Topical Report CE-1-A, Revision 20 as described in the Appendix of the report transmittal letter (50-454/82-07-01).
The inspector noted during performance of test Secticn 9.12 that there were no Quality Assurance personnel observing the performance of the test to monitor and ensure that procedural
.
requirements were met, data taken and properly recorded and
that deficient conditions were identified and documented.
.
~.
. -- -,
. - - _ _
-_-. -
.
-.
..
.
._
-. -. -. - - --.-
- __
-
.
-
.
Further review in this area is planned. This is open item 50-454/82-07-02, b.
The inspector observed portions of the performance of RHR system testing to preoperational tect Procedure 2.67.10.
The inspector observed briefings, conduct of the test, observation of precau-tions, calibration and placement of test instrumentation, t
documentation of results and unusual event / deficiencies.
No items of non-compliance were noted.
The inspector observed portions of the performa*nce of Feed Heater c.
Drain system testing to Procedure 2.40.20.
The inspector observed briefings, conduct of the test, observation of precautions, cali-
bration and placement of test instrumentation, documentation of test results and unusual event / deficiencies.
No items of non-compliance were noted.
d.
The inspector observed portions of Pressurizer Relief Tank Testing to test Procedure 2.69.20.
The inspector observed satisfactory verification of applicable prerequisites, performance of procedural requirements and data recording.
No items of non-compliance were noted.
3.
Inspection and Enforcement Circulars IEC 79-17 " Contact Problem in SB-12 Switches on General Electric Metalclad Circuit Breakers." The Licensee's review indicates that although some motor control centers are General Elect'ric all use Westinghouse control switches.
This circular is closed.
IEC 79-20 " Failure of GTE Sylvania Relay, Type PM Bulletin 7305, Catalog SU12-11-AC With a 120V AC Coll."
The Licensee's review indicates all relays utilized in Byron ESF Systems are Westinghouse which are mechanically different from GTE. This circular is closed.
IEC 79-25 " Shock Arrestor Strut Assembly Interference." The Licensee's review determined that the conditions identified in the circular are not a potential problem at Byron as the identified parts are not utilized. This circular is closed.
IEC 79-25 Supplement A
" Shock Arrestor Strut Assembly Interference."
The Licensee's review determined that the conditions identified in the circular supplement are not a problem at Byron as the identified parts are not utilized. This item is closed.
The inspector also reviewed Circulars 76-02, 76-03, 76-05, 773, 77-06, 77-13, 77-16, 783, 78-07, 78-08, 78-09, 78-18, 79-02, 795, 79-21, which could not be closed at this time.
,
..
,
- _
. _..
.
.
-
.
.
-
-
--
..
.-
.
-
.
4.
Fire Prevention Protection The inspector verified during tours that welding and grinding operations were being conducted in accordance with established procedures. The in-spector noted that some welding operations were being conducted without having fire extinguishers at the work site as required by Commonwealth Edison Byron Station Construction Procedure No. 17.
Station management advised that personnel would be reinstructed in the applicable require-ments.
Subsequent tours indicated that Procedure 17 was being complied with.
5.
Verification of Personnel Qualifications The inspector noted that it appeared one of the Rad Chem Foreman did not currently meet the requirements of ANSI 18.1-1971 for supervisors not requiring NRC license, nor would he meet the requirements at the time of scheduled initial core load as required by Section 4.3.2.
During the Exit Interview plant management committed to perform a comprehensive review of the individual's experience and document the review and actions necessary to be accomplished to qualify the individual to the applicable standard.
This item is considered Open Inspection Item 454/82-07-03.
6.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) at the conclusion of the inspection on April 30, 1982.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
The licensee acknowledged the findings reported herein.
4