IR 05000445/1996014

Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-445/96-14 & 50-446/96-14 on 961028-1101 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Major Areas Inspected:Core Physical Security Program

ML20134N708
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	11/20/1996
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134N682	List: IR 05000445/1996014 ML20134N678
References
50-445-96-14, 50-446-96-14, NUDOCS 9611270085
Download: ML20134N708 (2)

Text

- -. . . - .-. . .

,

.

4 .

ENCLOSURE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0tmISSION

REGION IV

Docket Nos.: 50-445 50-446 I

License Nos.: NPF-87 NPF-89 Report No.: 50-445/96-14 50-446/96-14 Licensee TU Electric Facili ty: . Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 Location: FM-56 Glen Rose, Texas Dates: October 28 through November 1, 1996 Inspector: A. B. Earnest, Physical Security Specialist Plant Support Branch Approved By: Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety ATTACHMENT:

Attachment: Supplemental Information DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED 9611270085 961120 PDR ADOCK 05000445 G PDR

' .

-2-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Report 50-445/96-14; 50-446/96-14 This inspection included portions of the core physical security program (81700) and.the initial inspection of the vehicle barrier system (TI 2515/132).

Plant Support

• An excellent vehicle barrier system (VBS) had been ' designed and installed

~

(Section 1.1).

• The bomb blast analysis was completed in accordance with the NRC recommended model. The licensee maintained the documentation of the analysis. The measurement distances used in the calculations appeared to be accurate (Section 1.2).

• An excellent security procedure was in place which detailed compensatory measures, surveillances, and maintenance of the VBS (Section 1.3).

• An excellent records and reports system had been established (Section2.1).

• An adequate audit program had been implemented (Section 2.2).

• A good protected area barrier system had been installed and maintained (Section 2.3).

• An effective training and qualification program for security officers had beenimplemented(Section2.4).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED i