IR 05000440/1993010
| ML20036B088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1993 |
| From: | Belanger J, Creed J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20036B077 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-93-10, NUDOCS 9305180147 | |
| Download: ML20036B088 (2) | |
Text
.
....
..
_ _ _ _ _.
_
-
.
I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION Ill Report No. 50-440/93010(DRSS)
Docket No. 50-440 License No. NPF-58 I
Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company 10 Center Road Perry, OH 44081
.
.
Facility Name:
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Inspection Dates: April 26-30, 1993 Type of Inspection: Announced, Routine Physical Security Date of Previous Physical Security inspection: November 16-20, 1992 Inspector:
Q ct w L 6:L.gz3 4//o/13 James' L. Belanger V
Datb Physical Security Inspector Accompanied By:
Robert B. Manili, Security Reviewer Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Approved By:
- [
A
!
Jam 6s R. Creed, Chief Date
{pfeguardsSection Inspection Summary Inspection on April 26-30. 1993 (Report No. 50-440/93010(DRSS))
Areas inspected:
Routine, announced physical security inspection involving Management Support, Security Program Plans and Audits; Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aids; Protected and Vital
,
'
Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles; and Alarm Stations and Communications.
Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements except for one licensee identified violation pertaining to the access authorization program for unescorted access. The violation is not being cited because the criteria specified in Section VII.B of the General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions of the Enforcement Policy were satisfied.
Enclosure Ccntains SANUARDS INTODU. TION Upon Separation Thie 9305180147 930512 PDR ADOCK 05000440 G
_
. _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
__
\\
.,
-
The licensee's corrective actions in response to the access authorization issue were timely, comprehensive, well documented, and should prevent recurrence.
Management support and involvement, staff experience and professionalism, security barriers and detection systems, and the Quality Assurance audit and surveillance program were excellent.
A weakness was noted in CCTV assessment of one protected area alarm zone.
Alarm station facilities and security computer capabilities were acceptable.
Several minor discrepancies noted in the licensee's approved security plan will require changes to be submitted to the NRC under 10 CFR 50.54(p). The
,
discrepancies did not pertain to NRC regulatory requirements.
'
!
!
!
i
!
E
,
i i
holosuro Contafns
'
'
E ata*1 g
?!s Is Dearrn m g
,
!