IR 05000440/1990007
| ML20033G724 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 04/02/1990 |
| From: | Christoffer G, Creed J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20033G722 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-90-07, 50-440-90-7, NUDOCS 9004120030 | |
| Download: ML20033G724 (4) | |
Text
p-
,
,
-
_
,
_.
_
-
'
i
.
,
I
) j
'
'
'
.
.
,
,
-
.. o
'
.
.
U.S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
"
.
.
', -
,
,
,
,
("- '
REGION III -
'
'
-
\\
i.
j (t)
i
,
,.
.
e rI.t Report No. 50.440/90007(DRSS)
.
i
.
i
.
.
-
.
!
',
Docket No. 50-440
- l
.
License"No. NPF-58 r
-
,
<
F, t
,
-
,
,
[D Licensee:
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company,
'
6.
t
-
.
P.O. Box 5000
.
'
Cleveland, OH 44101~..
'
-
.
.
,
Facility Name:
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1
[4
"
'
.
-
,
,
Inspection At:
Perry Plant-
'
ip
-
'
'
Inspection Conducted:
March 19-23, 1990
,
,
Inspector:.'N-A fd
""
v
.
.
g
/G.M. Christof fer
. p//
Date Physical Security Insp6ctor J
Approved By:
Dm, i
'
.
Date-
. James R. Creed.. Chief hsafeguardsSection
'
,,
.
'
'
Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted on March 19-23, 1990 (Report No. 50-440/90007(DRSS)).
Areas Inspected:
A routine, unannounced physical security-inspection involving l
TI 2515/102 (SIMS No MPA L9-07) " Land Vehicle Bomb Contingency Procedure Verification;" management support; protected and vital area barriers;1 access control personnel, packages and vehicles; power supply; and training and
!
qualification.
l l
Results:
The licensee was found to be in compliance within the areas examined.
'
'
'
The licensee's site security program is implemented in an adequate -
manner.
,
l l-
'
,
,
l l
i
'
a
!
9004120030 90040e
,
+g
'
e
,-
<'
FDR ADOC.K 03000440
'
.
.s n
,
a FDC
'
i
, x.
1.
,
s
,'
'3,
,
ij k
,
,,
k
_
,
.;
_
i
_
.
~_
_-
_.
c
,
.
"
,,
b y
DETAILS
'I.
g Dersons Contacted
!
'
.In addition to the key members of the licensee's staff listed below, i
the inspector interviewed other licensee empicyees and members of the security organization.
The asterisk (*) denotes those present at the
,
'
,
Exit Interview conducted on March 23, 1990.
.
-
'
'
- F. Stead, Director, Nuclear Support Department, Cleveland Electric
,
IlluminatingCompany,(CEI)
T. Mahon, Manager, Site Protection CEI
'
<
"A. $1erak, General Supervisor, Secarity Operations, CEI
,
,
,'
i
"R. Rose, Supervisor, Security / Fire Systems, CEI
-
-
- D. Craine, Security Shift Supervisor, CEI
,.
- J.'Palinkas, Supervisor, Nuclear Security Operations, CEI
,
- P. Scudier, Access Authorization Administrator, CEI
,
- D. Wood, Administrative Aid, CEI r,
- N. Lehman, Compliance Engineer, CEI
-
'
>
,
- J. Piron, Securit Engineer, CEI
,
,
- T. Stec, Quality ngineer, CEI
.
- M.' Ranija, System Engineer, CEI l
'
P. Hiland, Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC '
~
2.
Followup on a Generic Letter (IP 92703):
(Closed) Land Vehicle Bomb Continoency Proceduro Verification (Temporary:
Instruction 2515/102)):
Generic Letter 89-07, dated April 28, 1989, and its enclosure provided guidance for licensees to consider in planning for a land vehicle bomb potential threat. Generic Letter 89-07 also required licensees to confirm in writing, within 180 days from the date of receipt of the generic letter, that they have included in their safeguards contingency planning those short term actions that could be taken to cope with the land vehicle bomb threat.
The licensee provided the written confirmation by letter dated November 10, 1989, stating that the safeguards contingency procedure
'
had been revised to include short-term measures that could be taken to protect against attempted radiological sabotage involving a land vehicle bomb.
,
.
The inspector verified by interviews and a review of records that the
.
appropriate procedure had been revised to include planning to counter the land vehicle bomb threat.
Also, the inspector verified that the procedure addressed the possibility of receiving a warning about the-
,
'
threat' and that resources needed to implement short-range contingency measures are available.
This item is closed.
,
.
,
,
e i
!
2,
-
.
]
34:g;.{C y,
W e
i,Jg
.
,, ;
m
,
,
,
,
e
'
-
< g
.r
,
'
,
,
e
,..
%
-
a<<.
m
'
I
'
l a x,/
,
-
(
'.,
,
.
ew.
^
N.
.. l
~
,
+
,
y,.,,* b 3.
Entrance and Exit Interviews (IP 30703):
l,'
-
q
,
l a;
At the beginning of the inspection, Mr. F. Stead of the licensee!$
staffwasinformedofthepurposeofthisvisitandthefunctional!f.ll.
,
' -
areas to be examined.
- 3 i
,
b.
"The inspector met with the licensee representatives denoted in Section 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on March 23, 1990.
A general description of the scope of the inspection was provided.
Briefly listed below are the findings discussed during the exit
,
interview.
The details of these findings are referenced, as noted.
.in this report.
Included below is a statement provided by or describing licensee management's response,to each finding.
(1) The licensee acknowledged the inspector's comments that the actions taken regarding TI~2515/02 " Land Vehicle Bomb Contingency Procedures" were adequate to close the item.
(2) The licensee acknowledged the inspector's comments that no violations were identified during this inspection.
,,
4.
Program Areas Inspected Listed below are the core-inspection areas v:hich were examined by the inspector within the scope of.these inspection activities in which no violations, deviations, unresolved, or open items were identified.
These areas were reviewed and evaluated es deemed necessary by the inspector to meet the specified " Inspection Requirements" (Section 02) of NRC Inspection.
Manual Inspection Procedure 81700 as applicable to the security plan.
Sampling reviews included interviews, observations, testing of equipment, documentation review, and, at times, drills or exercises that provide independent verification to meet security commitments.
Only those areas in which findings were identified are described in subsequent sections of the report.
The depth and scope of activities were conducted as deemed appropriate and necessary for the program area and operational status of the security system.
~ Number Program' Area and Inspection Requirements Reviewed
- '
/. ~
.
,<
81700.
Physical Security Prog 3 m for Power Reactors
'
a.
Management Support:
(02.01b) Change to Security
'
"
,
'
,,
Plans Properly Reported and do not Reduce Security
, f 8
,
Effectiveness; (02.01c) Program and Corrective c -
'
-
I Action System for Annual Audits; Qualifications'
t
'
,
,
,
,
and Independence of Auditors; h
d
'
,*
,
,
,
.,
t
+
'
'
Protected and Vital Area Barriers':- (02.02a)"PA
,
b.
VA Barriers Meet Commitments and Provide Require,and.
'
^
'
'
.
d i
,
+/
PenetrationResistance;(02.02b)IsolationZonestl t;
'
'
,.
Adequately Maintained; il
'
'
(,
,
.c g.
- b 4,t
,
\\
[
,
'/,p
^
l i
,
'
t
3-
'
,
() (
'-
t
,
c I
- ; t.,
V
~.
p
<
--
Fin
.
,.
,
-
a
>
,
,,
t
., 4
. -
!
. l,,,, u.. ( ' ; >
.;
'
,
"
'
,
,
- a
+
y.
,
,
,
-
'
.
E
,e
.. '.
'
u
,
.
,
,
i,4 c.
Access Control-Personnel. Packages, and Vehicles:.
-
. (02.03a). Positive Access Control to include: Adequate'
~
.,, -
,
cJ Search Upon En+ering PA; Badges Displayed; (02.03b)
'
t
,
,
'
. n
.
Packages Searched and Properly Authorized; s
,.
d.'
Power Supply:
(02.05a) Secondary Power Source for N_
,
'
- .
3:
Alam and communication Systems; (02.0$b) Emergency '
,,
.
' "
.
Ingress and. Egress During Loss.cf Power; -
i
,
"
,
,
-
..
,
e.
Training and Qualification:. (02.076) Required
'
,
>
<
Armed Response and Supervisors Available;.
.
.
d
,
'
a-
,
(02.07e) Nonsecurity Personnel are Trained Equip
'and Qualified.for Assigned Security Tasks (i.e.. ped, l.
,
,
'
,
.
escort duties, etc.).
'
'
,
%
)
k
%
- $.
w
9>
-
.
,
{
g s,b _
),
i.
bi
'g
'#
,,.
,
'
' ll I
,
,
t i
I e'
g,
,
edi
'
y'
h
'
,
y
.Y
'
'
' ' '
g
,
,
/
l N:
/
'3
,
p'
.. *
- , C
,
k'
-
'
L
' '_
't k
.
,
f4 W*
,3 f
,
. y */g -
.f..
y 1,
t
,
j,
k y'
i
'
i'
,
i '
k. l.
)
,
t
'.7
,
g
< '.
3~
.,
,
r., W (,
'
- e
'{I
/_
w.
d
- *
,
$-
& 4
,
>
m
,L g
,,
s
,
.
.I
,
.
,
s '
t
,
',t s
j 1,*
,.,
",
,
't 5_,
n'
. 5^
'
'
,
,
4{
'
]
t
- g-
,
', *.
1,
'f
.
g,
+
q.
,<
,. '
f
,
'"t..
,
.m g,
., s
,' j !.'
'
..
,
t.
O
!,,
, *
s
~
-
,
- e s,
8'
,.
k y
'
s ' !
'
,
? L v.,
c
,,;..
,
i.
-
' >
,
+
4,'
R
,
k.
.
't
'
v'
.,,
a
=
i g
.. h
I :
,
,
<a
,,,
'
h
,
- '
3,
H
,
f-I I
'
,
,
a
'
'
,
- e
,
-
~
,
,
..
I i
&
'
'
'
.
-
,
j.
,
,
.
,
,
'.