IR 05000397/1982003
| ML20041F383 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1982 |
| From: | Willett D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041F380 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-397-82-03, 50-397-82-3, NUDOCS 8203160447 | |
| Download: ML20041F383 (4) | |
Text
,
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
.
Report No. 50-397/82-03
~
Docket No. 50-397 License No. CPPR-93 Safeguards Group Licensee: Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Facility Name: Washington Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2)
Inspection at: WNP-2 Site, Benton County, Washington Inspection conducted:
February 1-4, 1982 Inspectors:
pM W
2-2 6-82 y J. Willett, Rp/ actor Inspector Date Signed
/
\\
Approved by:
C'
h4
)*
M N-8A Tolbert Young, Jf.,'. Chigh lYons Project Branch PAactor Project Date Signed Section 2, Reactor OpeMt Summary:
l Inspection on February 1-4, 1982 (Report No. 50-397/82-03)
.
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of facility I
organization; follow-up on bulletins and circulars; preoperational i
testing; close out of open items and independent inspection. The l
inspection involved 24 onsite hours by one NRC inspector.
Results: Of the five areas inspected, no items of noncompliance
'
or devia'tions were identified.
8203160447 820226 gDRADOCK 05000397 PDR k
'
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- W. C. Bibb, Deputy Program Director
- J. D. Martin, Plant Manager
- J. F. Peters, Plant Administrative Supervisor R. Nelson, Manager, Project Licensing G. K. Afflerbach, Manager-Startup H. McGilton, Manager, Safety Engineering J. A. Landon, Maintenance Manager J. M. Graziani, Operations Quality Assurance Supervisor C. M. Powers, Reactor Engineering Supervisor G. Larson, Administrative Supervisor, Startup A. Yee, Principal Engineer / Safety The inspector also talked with other licensee personnel, including startup test engineers.
- Denotes persons present at the exit interview.
2.
Organization The organization, structure and personnel responsibility for the operation and administration of WNP-2 has changed from that previously reported. The maintenance function has been moved from operations and elevated to a new department headed by J.'A. Landon, who was previously a test group supervisor reporting to G. K. Afflerbach.
D. L. Whitcomb, Supervisor of Plant Engineering, has moved to corporate central engineering and his vacated position is open.
G. Larson has been appointed Administrative Supervisor /Startup reporting to G. K. Afflerbach.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
'.
-(79-15-01 Closed) Resolution of Problems: The RCIC preoperational test procedure was revised,to reflect FSAR requirements for testing the
-
cooling' water pressure control valve and testing of the turbine exhaust valve.* Instruction for installing / removing jumpers have been incorporated.
.
(80-13-01, Closed) Resolution of Problems: The flushing program procedures (FPI-l a d FPI-2) have been revised to incorporate:
inspection lighting
-
n requirements," tagging ;and logging of abnormal configurations, cleaning in progress, and, measures to insure cleanness.
-
P +
"
i
'h <-
.
-
,
,
'
,
,
+
.
'
.
. -2-
.
(81-04-01 Closed) Resolution of Problem: The Training Department has been placed on distribution for plant operations committee minutes to keep them informed of current design and procedure changes.
(81-04-03 Closed) Resolution of problem: Maintance training has been formalized.
(81-04-04 Closed) Resolution of Problem: The test and startup manual was modified to include test working group review of status of operating and emergency procedures that support testing.
(81-04-05 Closed)' Resolution of Problem: The test and startup program
'
manual was modified to require test working group approval of contractors test procedures and results.
(81-04-06 Closed) Resolution of Program: A certification program has been developed to qualify test engineers in each discipline in which they perform quality control (QC) inspection.
4.
Bulletin and Circular Followup:
(IB-80-17 Closed): WNP-2 design reflects a combination of General
'
Electric (GE) and owner recommendations to prevent a Brown's ferry type incident.
(IB-81-01 Closed):. WNP-2 does not use INC mechanical snubbers.
(IC-79-02 Closed): Because of the automatic transfer feature back to the inverter and the inclusion of regulating transformers, the scenario posed by this circular is not applicable.
(IC-80-09 Closed): WNP-2 internal telephone system receives power l
from an uninterruptible Division Power System backed up by the 250-VDC battery and will remain operational during a loss of offsite power.
(IC-80-15 Closed): This circular is not applicable to WNP-2.
(IC-81-01 Closed): Honeywell Series 2 indicating pushbutton switches i
are not used in the WNP-2 design.
(IC-81-06 Closed): WNP-2 basic instrumentation system operates in the 4-20 MA range and a check of pre-purchased specifications has found that no Foxboro 10-50 MA transmitters are utilized in safety-related systems.
l
.
- m f
9
- - -
-
-
'
.
'
.
-3-(IC-81-11 Closed): WNP-2 has reviewed their RHR system procedures and modified them to keep an RHR pump in service. Additionally a means of determining reactor water temperature will be available.
(IC-81-12 Closed): This circular is not applicable to WNP-2.
5.
Preoperational Testing The inspector examined selected circulating water preoperational test records and discussed the conduct of testing with engineers.
Preoperational test procedures for reactor isolation core cooling and circulating water were reviewed for: content and the appropriate sign off and hold points; and balance against FSAR requirements-to verify that they would accomplished their intended purpose.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Independent Inspection The inspector reviewed selected documentation associated with preoperational testing and verified that they had been filled in correctly / completely and that they. contained the~ appropriate signatures and reviews / approvals.
The inspector also tracked selected open items generated by preoperational
_
testing, startup problem reports (SPRs), through the licensee's computer /
. log tracking systen to verify the systems adequacy / completeness.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Par,agraph 1)
at the conclusion of the inspection on february 4,1982. The scope and findings of the inspection were discussed and are summarized as set forth in Paragraphs 2 'through 6.
e