IR 05000363/1979008
| ML19257C176 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000363 |
| Issue date: | 10/24/1979 |
| From: | Mcgaughy R, Narrow L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19257C169 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-363-79-08, 50-363-79-8, NUDOCS 8001250137 | |
| Download: ML19257C176 (8) | |
Text
.
.
.
'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No. 50-363/79-08 Docket No. 50-363 License No. CPPR-96 Priority Category A
--
Licensee:
Jersey Central Power & Light Company 260 Cherry Hill Road Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Facility Name:
Forked River Nuclear Station Inspection at:
Forked River, New Jersey Inspection conduct
Octo er-11, 1979 GW
/0/1'f[7 7 Inspectors:
zmA L'. Tiarrow, Rea'ctor Inspector date signed'
date signed date signed
,
Approved by:
- $.I4h
/[2 7(ff
. W. McGa6dhy, Chief, Construction da te' s i g~ned
.
Project Section, RC&ES Branch Inspection Summary:
Inspection on October 10-11, 1979 (Report No. 50-363/79-08)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by a regional based inspector of the QA program for storage and maic+enance of equipment, materials, and structures during suspension of construction, and the status of outstanding items.
The inspection involved 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> on site by one regional based inspector.
Results: One item of noncompliance was identified in the one area inspected.
(Failure to comply with established requirements for Venting Air Building No.
2).
1808 006 Region I Form 12 8001250 (Rev. April 77)
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted General Public Utilities Service Corporation (GPU)
- D. Callahan, FRNS Environmental Scientist
- G. Derk, QA Site Representative
- J. Griest, Project Construction Manager
- R. E. He.ttler, Preventive Maintenance Engineer
- T. Hreczuch, Engineer
- P. B. Magitz, QA Auditor
- G. Porr, Projects Site Administrator Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation (S&W)
- D. T. Bodkin, Senior Site Representative P. Heft, Field Engineer
- Denotes those present at the exit intervie.w.
2.
General During the entrance interview the inspector was informed that S&W had been retained foi Derformance of oreventive service, and to provide labor and supervision for perform'ance of receiving, storage and cleanup activities on site.
The service crew consists of seven men, including an electrician and an operator.
Equipment is still arriving on site and some equipment requiring level
"A" storage is due to arrive in February,1980.
A level "A" storage area of sufficient size to accorr.modate this equipment is not presently available on site.
3.
Plant Tour The inspector made a tour of the site to observe status of installed materials and materials in storage; and the condition of the storage and laydown areas.
The inspector observed removal of defective concrete at column foundations in the Auxiliary Building base mat.
This condition 1808 007
.
.
had been identified during coating of anchor bolts, had been documented on Nonconformance Report (NRC) No. 0101, and dispositioned for removal to solid concrete and repair in accordance with an exiting approved repair procedure.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
4.
Venting of Air Building No. 2 During review of Field Shutdown Procedures (FSP's), the inspector observed that FSP-1-12 required that temperature / humidity (T/H) data be collected every work-day in the morning to determine if venting of the Air Building is necessary, that venting be performed if necessary.
and that records of the collected data be maintained on file at the site and forwarded to GPUSC Engineering on a monthly basis.
The inspector was informed by the licensees representative that daily T/H readings had been discontinued on August 3, 1979 and that'a request for approval to suspend the requirements of this procedure had been submitted to the GPU Project Manager.
The inspector confirmed that the last T/H readings documented had been taken August 3, 1979 and that a memo FRS-0404 dated September 17, 1979 had been sent to the Project Manager requesting suspension of the procedure.
The inspector also noted that data taken prior to August 3, 1979 had required venting of the building 22 days during the period May 10 - August 3, 1979.
Failure to comply with the requirements of Procedure FSP-1-12 is considered to be in noncompliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V.
(363/79-08-01)
5.
Inspection of NSSS Components The inspector discussed recommendations by Combustion Engineering (CE)
in the report attached to their letter J-CE-4566 dated September 26, 1979 to GPU.
The report is entitled " Final Report of Inspection of NSSS Components on Site Storage." Although the date of submittal of the report was fairly recent, the inspector was informed that it covered a number of inspections conducted since November 28, 1979 and that the results had been discussed informally during each inspection.
The recommendations included:
1808 008
.
a.
Cleaning of rust in reactor vessel studholes.
The report stated that CE was preparing a procedure for performance of this work and recommended that it be done be' ore this winter.
'
b.
Re-check of resistance of pressurizer heater as soon as practical with annual re-checks thereafter.
The inspector was informed that this work was also awaiting further information from CE.
This item is unresolved pending review by an NRC inspector of compliante with these recommendations.
(363/79-02)
6.
Review of Procedures The inspector reviewed the licensee procedures for storage, preventive service and protection of materials, equipment and structures and the revised QA procedures listed below:
a.
Shutdown Procedures FSP-1-01, Rev. 1, Receiving, Storage, Handling and Control of Owner Furnished Equipment FSP-1-02, Rev. 1, Notification of Fire Protection /or Dewatering system Failure FSP-1-03, Rev. 1, Control of Manuafacturer's Representatives FSP-1-04, Rev. 1, Building Settlement Monitoring. Program FSP-1-05, Rev. 1, Preventative Services FSP-1-08, Rev. 1, Notification of Fire at Site and Response by Site Protection Staff FSP-1-09, Rev.1, Maintenance of Quality Assurance Record Vault and Computer Room FSP-1-10, Rev. O, Site Environmental Control Program FSP-1-12, Rev.1, Venting of Air Building FSP-1-14, Rev. 1, Calibration FSP-1-15, Rev. 1, Reporting of Scrious Incidents 1808 009
.
FSP-1-16, Rev. O, Preservation of Substructive Material FSP-1-17, Rev. O, Project Organization and Responsibilities FSP-1-18, Rev. O, Fire Protection System Outage FSP-1-19, Rev. O, Entry to Vessels, Tanks and Confined Spaces FSP-1-21, Rev. 0, Regging and Handling of Material and Components S&L-1, Rev.1, Evaluating Reportability of Deficiences to the NRC SPP-C-3.01, Reporting of Significant Deficiencies to th' NRC b.
QA Procedures FR-5-03, Rev. 1, Control of Site Contractor Procedure Approval FR-7-01, Rev. 4, Receipt Inspection Procedure FR-10-02, Rev. 2, Stop Work Procedure by Site QA/QC FR-10-04, Rev. 4, Site QA/QC Surveillance Procedure FR-12-01, Rev. 1, Control of Site QA/QC Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE)
FR-14-01, Rev. 2, Inspection and Test Status Indicators FR-15-01, Rev. 3, Control of Nonconformances FR-18-01, Rev. 1, Response to GPUSC Forked River Nuclear Station Site Audits Except as noted in Paragraph 9 of this report, the procedures for receiving, handling, storage and preservation of materials and equipment conform to the requiret'ents of Section 1.6 of the PSAR, and the installed materials and structures conform to the requirements established by GPU, S&W and Burns and Roe during their meetings in April and May, 1979.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
1808 010
.
.
.
7.
Storage and Preservation of Equipment, Materials and Structures The inspector observed the status of protective action for preservation of the installed structure.
Tendon ducts, pipe and conduits have been capped, instal 5d rebar and anchor bolts coated with preservative, exposed waterstop painted and pits, sumps, etc. have been covered or roofed over.
Excess material has been removed from the building ~nd surrounding area which has been cleaned up and graded for drainage.
The inspector also observed storage conditions in the main warehouse and in the rebar laydown areas.
The protective coatings and condition of dessicant in a random selection of equipment and pipe spools were observed to be acceptable.
Reinforcing steel in the laydown areas was suitably stored on timbers and tagged for identification.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
8.
Preventive Service Documentation The inspector examined the QA and Preventive Service records listed below:
a.
Master 0FE (0wner Fcrnished Equipment) list.
This list identified all equipment on site, shows the equipment number, purchase ordar number, its storage location, weight, QA status, date of receipt and its associated ESHC (Equipment Storage History Card) number.
b.
The schedule for preventive service.
c.
The summary chart for Substructure Material Preservation Maintenance showing for each item its location, type of protection, date applied and the maintenance schedule and requirements.
d.
The Substructure Material Preservation Program showing dates and results of inspections.
e.
Preventive maintenance reports of nonconforming items identified.
during above inspections.
f.
Records of temperature / humidity readings in QA vault and computer room.
g.
QC surveillance inspection schedules.
h.
QC surveillance inspection reports and inspection report log.
1808 011
.
i.
A random selection of ESHC's showing preventive services performed since June 1979.
j.
Training and Qualification of the GPU QA Site Representative.
k.
Log of Nonconformance reports.
1.
Hold Tan '
No items of noncomplince were identified.
9.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Noncompliance (79-07-01):
Failure of QA to approve storage and servicing instructions and to perform surveillance inspections of the preventive service program.
The inspector examined the ESHC's which had now been reviewed and approved by QA and reviewed the QA surveillance procedure as noted in Paragraph 6 above.
The inspector also discussed surveillance activities with the 0A Site Representa-tive.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (79-07-03):
Tagging of rebar.
The inspector observed that the previously untagged rebar had been tagged.
A random inspection of rebar in the laydown area disclosed no conditions similar to those previously identified.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (79-07-04):
Watership in contact with rebar.
NCR No. 0106 has been written to document instances of Watership in contact with rebar.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (79-07-02):
Lack of a complete preventive services program.
The inspectors review of the preventive services and QA programs identified the following items as lacking:
A procedure for training / qualification of surveillance personnel
--
is not available on site.
Site QA/QC Site Surveillance Procedure FR-10-04 references Procedure 7-10-01 which is apparently a GPU corporate procedure but which is not identified in the index of those procedures and is not available on site.
The inspector was informed that 7-10-01 is a new procedure which has been approved and will be sent to the site.
A records storage procedure is not available on site.
The inspector
--
was informed that Procedure FR-17-03 will be issued for storage of records.
1808 012
.
.
_
Surveillance of substructure preservation is not included in the
--
Site QA/QC Surveillance Procedure.
Requirements have not been established for approval of shutdown
-
procedures and QA procedures.
The procedures have been approved by a varying number of people.
10.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items or items of noncompliance.
An unresolved item disclosed during this inspection is discussed in paragraph 5.
11.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on October 11, 1979, a meeting was held at the Forked River site with representatives of the licensee and contractor organization.
The inspector summarized the res"1ts of the inspection as described in the report.
} Odbb b