IR 05000363/1979001
| ML19276E712 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000363 |
| Issue date: | 02/06/1979 |
| From: | Mcgaughy R, Narrow L, Sanders W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19276E704 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-363-79-01, 50-363-79-1, NUDOCS 7903200310 | |
| Download: ML19276E712 (5) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No. 50-363/79-01 Docket No. 50-363 License No. CPPR-96 Priority -- Category A Licensee: Jersey Central Power & Licht Company 260 Cherry Hill Road Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Facility Name: Forked River Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Inspection at: Forked River, New Jersey Inspection condu ed: Januar 3-25, 1979 Inspectors: _
- M A/g[[f A
L. Narrow, Reactor Inspector 'dats signed W WC4 Wh) g.1-,977 W. F. Sanders, Reactor Inspector date signed date signed Approved by: kld]lflhtu k r~ f, /9}f it. W. McGaugby( C#Ief, Construction dats signed Project Section, RC & ES Branch Insoection Summary: _ Inspection on January 23-25, 1979 (Report No. 50-363/79-01) Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection by two regional based inspectors of QA program for fabrication and installation of the containment liner; the status of the Morrison-Knudsen QC program improvements; and the status of outstanding items.
The inspection involved 42 hours on site by two regional based inspectors.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
79032003(o Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted General Public Utilities Service Corpora *;on (GPU)
- R. F. Fenti, Lead Site QA Auditor
- S. Levin, Supervisor, Site Engineering S. D. Morris, QC Engineer E. Staples, QC Engineer
- J. C. Thompson, Site QC Supervisor
- R. L. Wayne, Construction QA Manager
- J. E. Wright, Site QA Manager Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation (S&W)
- K. J. Platte, Resident Engineer
- W. M. Sweetser, Project Manager
- R. L. Wagner, Superintendent of Construction Morrison-Knudsen (M-K)
J. Crowe, Project Manager R. Smith, QA Engineer R. Stauber, QA Manager Other Personnel
- L. McKeown, NRC, Region I, Security Inspector (Intern)
- denotes those present at the exit interview.
The inspector also interviewed other licensee contractor employees during the inspection.
2.
Plant Tour . The inspector made a tour of the construction site to observe work activities in progress. The inspector examined work items for any obvious defects or noncompliance with regulatory require-ments and for evidence of quality contro's of the work.
Specific activities observed by the inspector included concrete curing, preparation for placing concrete, storage of equipment, and weather protection for work in progres. Primary Containment Penetrations A visual inspection was made of two primary containment penetrations M43 and M44 which are classed as pump suction lines and are part of the safety injection system.
The penetrations have been installed through the steel rebar in the containment structure prior to the placement of concrete.
The penetrations are canstructed with an outer pipe of 36" diameter carbon steel with an inner stainless steel pipe 24" diameter and a resulting pressure tight space between.
The penetrations are considered to be a code pressure vessel con-structed and tested to the requirements of ASME Section III 1977, with winter 1977 addenda and are appropriately stamped NPP-1 The penetrations were inspected for installation, visual inspection of welds and surface conditioning, surface protection and visible identification of code stamping.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
4.
Records The inspector reviewed the following records and certifications related to the fabrication and installation of two Safety Injection pump suction penetrations M43 and M44.
-- Material test certifications -- ASME Code data reports NPP-1 Radiography data records -- -- Weld procedures -- Weld procedures qualificatioi.
Weld records -- -- Manufacture's certificate of compliance No items of noncompliance were identifie. Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (0 pen) Unresolved Item (78-16-02): Program for improving the effec-tiveness of the M-K QC program. The inspector discussed training of M-K QC personnel with licensee and M-K QC personnel; reviewed personnel records and qualifications; reviewed nonconformance reports (NCR's) written since December 18, 1978 by GPU and M-K; and, reviewed reports of GPU surveillance of M-K work for the period December 27, 1978 through January 23, 1979.
The M-K QC organization now includes one level III inspector; eight level II inspectors, seven qualified for pre-placement and placement of concrete, two for cadwelding and one for soil com-paction inspection; two level I inspectors; and two trainees.
The inspector also exar..ined the following: QCP-16 FR, Revision 1, " Quality Control Inspection Training - Program," dated November 6, 1978 QC training schedule for the period January 31, 1979 to - March 7,1979 Project Change Notice (PCN) S-138 dated June 22, 1978 which - clarified endorsement of ANSI N45.2.6-1974 instead of ANSI N45.2.6-197?- This item remains unresolved oending further review by an NRC inspector of the effectiveness of QC personnel in performance of their functions.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (78-16-03): Weather protection for welding of Reactor Pit Liner.
The contractor has not been able to complete the installation of the center plates due to continuing weather problems and the resultant water accumulation in the bottom.
Alternate plans have been developed to discontinue the work on the reactor pit liner plates until the container main floor has been completed with the concrete placements and the installation of the vertical containment rings have started.
This would per-mit a reschedule of the welding to a more weather predicable time of the year.
This item remains unresolved until a dry environment can be estab-lished for weldin. .
6.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on January 25, 1979, a meeting was held at the Forked River site with representatives of the licen-see and contractor organization.
The inspector summarized the results of the inspection as described in this report. }}