IR 05000352/1987030
| ML20149E785 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1988 |
| From: | Bailey R, Keimig R, Lancaster W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149E767 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-352-87-30, NUDOCS 8802110276 | |
| Download: ML20149E785 (5) | |
Text
U @ W Y3 !31:w,
.'_
(3!J0)
(31GMIW I.)
N
,
,
PMs Y 1,)T W
ac 0 x;r m n (pt.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
50-352/87_-30 Docket No.
50-352 License No.
NPF-27 Licensee:
Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19101 Facility Name:
Limerick Generating Station Inspection At:
Limerick, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted: November 30. - December 3, 1987 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: July 27-30, 1987 Type of Inspect on:
Rputine, unannounced Physical Security
)
d Inspectors:
,d 3 [k W J. Baile, Physical Security Inspector I date E l' L~cu s
2/aer
,
'W. K Lantaster, Physical Security Inspector datd
,
Approved by:
k.
M.
fd P, /988 R. R. Keimig, Chief, Safeguah!T Section date l
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Inspection Summary:
Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on N:vember 30, Dece-ber 1-3,1987 (Inspection No. 50-352/87-30)
Areas Inspected: Management Effectiveness; Security Organization; Security Program Audit; Testing and Haintenance; Locks and Keys; Physical Barriers (Protected and Vital Areas); Lighting; Assessment Aids; Access Control (Personnel and Packages); and Detection Aids (Protected and Vital Areas).
Results: The licensee was in compliance with the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan in the areas inspected, h$
kob Q
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i
%
Details l
1.
Key Personnel Contacted G. M. Leitch - Vice President J. Franz - Operations Manager J. King - Support Manager V. A. Warren - Test Engineer J. F. Rubert - Supervisor, Quality Assurance C. B. Harmon - Quality Assurance Engineer E. C. Gibson - Quality Assurance Engineer F. J. Larken - Nuclear Security Specialist W. H. Snych - Chief Security Coordinator M. V. Annast - Senior Vice President, Protection Technology, Inc.
V. M. Vitale - Program Manager, Protection Technology, Inc.
T. W. Straub - Site Captain, Protective Technology, Inc.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
E. Kelly - Senior Resident Inspector The inspector also interviewed other Philadelphia Electric Company personnel and members of the Protection Technology, Inc. contract security force.
2.
Management Effectiveness The inspectors discussed the following actions undertaken by the licensee to enhance the effectiveness of the security program at Limerick since the last inspection.
The licensee has fully trained and assigned eight proprietary
-
security shif t supervisors to provide around-the-clock management oversight of the contract guard force.
The licensee's security shift supervisors are assigned administrative
-
duties to allow the licensee's nuclear security specialist to devote more time to managing the program.
>
The licensee implemented a Security Incident Review Committee to
-
review all reportable security related events for significance and impact on the security program.
The security force contractor completed an annual, random drug
-
screening of the guard force and conducted unannounced searches for drugs in all work areas utilized by security force personnel.
The security force contractor has assigned a surveillance test
-
team to each shift to test security systems and equipment to ensure it performs properly.
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,
o The security force contractor has provided each armed member of the
-
security force with an assigned weapon for which he/she is responsible for and will use during annual requalification.
The licensee expanded the armory and equipment room to facilitate
-
the issuance of security equipment and to enhance safety when handling firearms.
The security force contractor has increased employee benefits for
-
sick and bereavement leave and jury duty.
The inspectors also discussed generic findings from the ongoing NRC Regulatory Effectiveness Review (RER) program. The inspectors noted that a representative of the Limerick security organization was present when an RER was conducted in September, 1987 at the Peach Bottom Atomic Generating Station.
The Limerick security supervisor stated that security program enhancements, as a result of the Peach Bottom RER, had been undertaken.
3.
Security Organization The inspectors reviewed the security organization and found it to conform with the NRC-approved security plan (the plan).
4.
Security Program Audi_t The inspectors reviewed the licensee's annual audit of the security program ct;nducted on August 28, 1987 and Nnvember 3, 1987. The licensee utilized a consultant with security program and management expertise in performing this audit.
The inspectors found that the audit was compre-hensive and covered the requirements and performance objectives of the NRC-approved security plans.
The licensee was in the process of responding to the audit findings and recommendations at the time of this inspection.
The inspectors observed that no violations of the plan had been identified.
The responses to the findings and recommendations will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
5.
Testing and Maintenance The inspectors reviewed records and observed the security force surveillance test teams, which are assigned to each shift, conduct required functional testing of search equipment and detection aids.
The inspectors found that the plant maintenance staff was promptly responding to security related equipment problems, based on priorities established by licensee security managemen *
.
.
6.
Locks and Keys
'
The inspectors conducted a random review of the administrative controls for protected and vital area keys and determined that the controls and their implementation are appropriate to prevent compromise.
7.
Physical Barriers (Protected Area)
The inspectors observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the protected area in accordance with the plan. An inspector selected sample of the perimeter intrusion detection system was satis-f actorily tested by the licensee.
8.
Physical Barriers (Vital Areas)
The inspectors toured several vital areas and determined that the licensee was maintaining the physical barriers surrounding these vital areas in accordance with the plan.
9.
Lighting The inspectors observed, the lighting in the isolation zones and throughout the protected area between the hours of 6:00 p.m.- 8:30 p.m.,
on December 1, 1987, and found that it met the requirements of the plan and was adequate for its intended function.
10.
Assessment Aids The inspectors determined, by observation in day!ight and during hours of darkness, that the assessment aids utilized by the licensee conformed to the plan commitments.
All equipment was functioning properly.
11.
Access Control (personnel)
Observation by the inspectors during this inspection found that all persons authorized for unescorted protected area access are issued a numbered photo-identification badge and are appropriately monitored at the point of entry to the protected area.
Identification badges were observed being displayed as required by the plan ~.
12. Access Control - Packages The inspectors determined that the licensee was meeting the commitments of the plan concerning access control of packages entering the protected area. The inspectors made this determination by observing the security force rembers conducting both physical and electronic searches of hand carried packages on December 2, 1987 and December 3, 1987.
t
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ _ ____ __
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
.-
,
,
L
.'
'
<
13. Detection Aids (Protected Area)
-
-
The inspectors determined that the licensee was matntaining the detection J-aids for the protected area barrier in conformance with the plan.
Additionally, the perimeter intrusion detection system functioned properly -
during all inspector requested tests of the system.
14. Detection Aids (Vital Areas)
,
t The inspectors determined that the licensee was maintaining the detection
,
aids for the vital areas in conformance with the plan, j
- -
Tills F M /iOR'?H C0Hil!NS St.r gg g gs
!
it! Fir:f uTF "n !c. !:0i FD;l PUCUC
CiSO.02:lt n !S U!TET!D';cty
sp; r ";y,
Immediate corrective action was taken to reduce the alarm reset times and the licensee agreed to determine and correct the cause.
15. hitInterview t
.The inspectors met with :he licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 on December 3, 1937, and discussed the scope and results of the inspec-tien, No written material was provided to the licensee dveing this inspection.
,
.
!
'
,
(
'
,
l
!
{
t t
,
a i
.-
,
_
-.
_.
_ _ _ _
_ _
_.
_
_
,