IR 05000339/1978036

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-339/78-36 on 781211-14.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Reviewing Engineering repts,10CFR50.55(e) Items & QA Program Documentation
ML19261B523
Person / Time
Site: North Anna 
Issue date: 01/02/1979
From: Herdt A, Mcfarland C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19261B521 List:
References
50-339-78-36, NUDOCS 7902280122
Download: ML19261B523 (6)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. >RRfCu UNITED ST ATEs

,o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ., f, [[' ,o

REGION ll

'"g " $ 101 MARIETTA sTRELT N.W.

  • I

[ ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30303 og .. f ..... Report No.. 50-339/78-36 Docket No.: 50-339 License No.- CPPR-78 Category: A3 Licensee: Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261 Facilifj Name: North Anna Power Station, Unit 2 Inspection at: Louisa County, Virginia Inspection conducted: December 11-14, 1978 Inspector: C. R McF rland 7f Reviewed by: / A. RT Herdt, Chief 'Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on December 11-14, 1978 (Report No. 50-339/78-36) Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee action on reviewing engineering reports, 10 CFR 50.55(e) items, and QA program docu-mentation.

This inspection involved 27 inspector-hours on-site by one NRC inst?ctor.

R' ults: No items of noncompliance or deviations cere disclosed.

790228012. e RII Rpt. No. 50-339/78-36 I-1 DETAILS I Prepared y: 7f y C. R. McFarlard, Principal Inspector 'Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Dates of Inspection: December 11-14, 1978 Reviewed by: I} A. R. Herdt, Chief Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Suppot+ Branch 1.

Persons Contacted a.

Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) E. R. Bane, Supervisor, Construction Quality Assurance (QA)

  • P. A. Slater, Resident QA Engineer hM. A. Harrison, QA Engineer J. E. Wroniewicz, QA Engineer
  • P. G. Perry, Senior Resident Engineer b.

Contractor Organiza @ Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation (S&Q

  • A. A. Dasenbrock, Resident Manager
  • C. D. Lundin, Superintendent, Field Quality Control (FQC)
  • R. L. Spence, Assistant Superintendent, FQC G. M. Byrnes, Senior FQC Engineer, Audits and Coordinators Group J. Crossland, FQC Engineer S. Patton, FQC Senior Records Clerk FQC Engineer, Structural FQC Inspector, Structural Senior FQC Engineer, Mechanical FQC Engineer, Mechanical FQC Engineer, ASME III Section FQC Engineer, Receiving R. P. Bene, Head, Site Engineering Office (SEO)

E. W. Spurrell, Electrical Engineer, SEO P. Phebus, Materials Engineer, SE0 W. D. Miller, Senior Electrical Inspector, FQC

  • Denotes those r'.ending the Exit Intervie.

. RII Rpt. No. 50-339/78-36 I-2 2.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findingr (0 pen) Item 339/77-37-01, E&DRC Review, Unit 2 a.

As noted in IE Report 50-339/77-37, Details I paragraph 6.g(3), VEPC0 committed to review all Engineering and Design Coordination Reports (E&DCR's) which had been written on Category I Unit 2, as well as Unit 1, equipment to assure that they had been completed or otherwise resolved prior to initial criticality. The Unit I review by NRC inspectors is reported in IE Report 50-338/78-04.

The inspector and the NRC Resident Inspector (NRC:RI) reviewed the VEPCO and S&W documentation that establishes the review program (March 15, 1978, VEPCO to S&W), the S&W review program (March 24, 1978, S&W to VEPCO), the categorization of E&DCR's (S&W internal memos dated April 19 and April 24, 1978), the applicability of Unit 1 E&DCR's to Unit 2 (S&W int ernal memo dated June 12, 1978) and interim status reports of the review work (S&W internal memos dated April 24 and June 1, 1978, and an undated summary issued about mid-June 1978). The inspectors reviewed the S&W review program which was conducted in three phases: (1) Verify the accuracy of the identification of Unit 2 Category I E&DCR's by S&W Construction and Fischback & Moore (F&M) personnel; (2) Verify the accuracy of the S&W Site Engineering Office's (SEO) categorization review within the S&W Release Status Facility (RSF) files and in conjunction verify work completion through S&W Field Quality Control (FQC) acceptance signatures on the documents; and (3) Insure the proper identifi-cation of all old E&DCR's and Field E&DCR's not under computer listings.

The S&W (Boston) Engineering Assurance (EA) group audited the SE0 activities related to Unit 2 E&DCR's on June 20-22, 1978 (report 12050-057) and reaudited the same activity on December 4-8, 1978.

The inspector reviewed the audit report 12050-057 and the documen-tation of the followup work and the review by FQC of the corrective action by SEO. The inspector discussed with the VEPCO Resident QA Engineer the findings and observations of the December 4-8, 1978, audit wherein the EA audited 500 E&DCR's.

The ins, 'or reviewed the S&W Nuclear Project Operating Procedure (POP) No. POP-500 " Field Procedure for the Control and Flow of Engineering and Design Coordination Reports (E&DCR's)" Revision 1 issuad rabiuary 2, 1978, and Revision 2, issued November 7, 1978, and PDF,17 " Document Control", Revision 1, issued June 30, 1978.

Work related to E&DCR's has been reviewed by the RII inspector as part of the review of QA program activities as reported in IE Reports Nos. 50-339/78-4, 78-6, 78-1 RII Rpt. No. 50-339/78-36 I-3 The inspector and the NRC:RI selected a random sample of twenty-two Category I E&DCR's and the inspector reviewed the E&DCR's and the corrective action that completed the requirements for the E&DCR's listed below.

The inspector also made field obse rvations of representative work and discussed the subjects with appropriate SE0 and FQC personnel as appropriate.

DATE FQC E&DCR SYSTEM TITLE CLOSED P0797 300 V Instrument Cable 11/06/78 P1299 Earthquake Requirements 10/25/77 04432 Placement Procedure 09/07/73 7099 Parker Tube Adaptors, 7K 07/20/78 7099 Parker Tube Adaptors, 7J 11/28/78 11165 Cable Termination 05/03/78 13190 Wiring Diagram 05/10/78 13634 Electric Penetrations 09/07/78 14887A Anchor Bolt Inspection 04/25/78 21255 Carbon Steel Weld Procedure C6/27/78 21389 Modify Vents and Drain Connections 11/06/78 21681 As Built FM, hAS 414 02/02/77 22393 Flushing Operation 04/05/78 22824 Hanger Design 11/25/78 24091A Cleaning Required for Insulation 10/02/78 24297 Revise NAS 416 10/13/76 24)55A liilti Bolt 11/28/78 24804 Liner Attachment 05/?0/78 25477 Procurement Specifications 04/03/78 30157 Hanger As Built 06/16/77 14928A Metal Guards 04/26/78 32011 SI-R-115 04/11/78 This item remains open pending the review of categorization review work by S&W by the NRC:RI. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

3.

Unresolved Items There were no new unresolved items identified during this inspection.

4.

Independ_at Inspection The i pector toured the Unit 2 facility, observed work inside the conta ment vessel and in the auxiliary building, talked to various craft personnel, and discussed the schedule for work to be performed with the VEPCO Senior Resident Engineer, and the NRC Resident Insp-ctor.

No items of noncompliance or devia: ions were identifie. RII Rpt. No. 50-339/78-10 I-4 5.

Review of QA Manual, Inspection and Enforcement History The inspector performed a review of the QA manuals and docket files to inc.lude the following: inspections relative : QA programs and site act'eities; enforcement correspondence and responses; the construction de ntciency file, and the status of construction.

The inspector's review of the VEPC0 QA manual indicates that VEPC0 has developed and is adequately executing a QA program consistent with the SAR commitments relative to design, procurement, construction, enforcement response, and the reporting of deficiencies. The QA organization has remained relatively stable. The surveillance of the QA activities of the construction contract work has continued consistent with the status of the project, procedural changes have been incorporated to eliminate repetitive deficiencies and/or otherwise increase the effectiveness of the execution of the overall QA program.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6.

Licensee Identified Items VEPC0 has reported a number of items to Region II as reportable items in compliance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) and/or 10 CFR 21, and the inspector reviewed the items noted below and the supporting documentation, and discussed the items with responsible staf f during the inspection.

(0 pen) Item 339/78-36-01 Stress Analysis of Service Water and a.

Component Cooling Water Systems Piping and Piping Supports: Region II has received the VEPCO response dated November 22, 1978, serial number 656. VEPCO and S&W are currently considering alter-natives for evaluating the potential overstress conditions in the Service Water and Component Cooling Water piping and piping supports for certain operational modes when the service water temperature may exceed 95 F or fall below 70 F.

This item was not available for inspection.

b.

(0 pen) Item 339/78-36-02, Spare Piping Penetrations of Containment: Region II has received the VEPC0 response dated November 22, 1978, serial number 661. VEPCO and S&W have.fetermined that only one end of certain spare piping penetrations of the containment have been capped.

Corrective action will be taken to seal both ends of the spare containment pipe pentrations in accordance with the requirements of the FSAR. This item was not available for inspection.

c.

(open) Item 339/78-36-03, High Density Fuel Storage Rack Welds: Region II has received the VEPC0 response dated November 27, 1978, serial number 666. A random field review of the racks indicates that possible weld burn-through exists on can interior surface, . RII Rpt. No. 50-339/78-36 I-5 Cans identified as having possible burn-through will be inspected to determine if a problem does exist and the potential safety significance of the conditions.

This item was not available for inspection.

d.

(Open) Item 339/78-36-04, Diesel Generator Battery Rack Materials: Region II has received the VEPC0 response dated December 8,1978, serial number 706. Certain bracing and wall clips for the battery racks have been found to be inadequate for seismic conditions.

Adequately sized components will be fabricated and installed. This item was not available for inspection.

(open) Item 339/78-36-05, Break in Service Water Reservoir Spray e.

System Piping: On December 11, 1978, VEPC0 informed Region II of a break in the underwater spray piping header that has caused a reduction in flow the the spray nozzles. The cause of the failure and the corrective action will be reported to Region II. This item was not available for inspection.

7.

Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in para-graph 1) and reviewed the scope and findings of the inspection. There were no unanswered questions or dissenting comments. }}