IR 05000322/1982003
| ML20041B440 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1982 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Paolino R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041B435 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0420, RTR-NUREG-420 50-322-82-03, 50-322-82-3, NUDOCS 8202230638 | |
| Download: ML20041B440 (5) | |
Text
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION I
Report No.
50-322/82-03 Docket No.
50-322 License No. CPPR-95 Priority
--
Category B
Licensee:
Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Facility Name:
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Inspection at:
Shoreham, New York Inspection conducte - January 12-15, 1982 Inspector:
/1/i JY
/- dV0Y R.gfaolino,~ Reactor Engineering Inspector date signed dI 2/E[82-Approved by:
in i
S. D. Ebneter, Acting Chief, Plant Systems Section / date signed Inspection Summary:
Inspection on January 12-15, 1982 (Report No. 50-322/82-03)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of the plant Fire Protection /
Prevention Program including: Administrative Controls, Control of Combustibles, Maintenance, Inspection / Tests, Fire Brigade training requirements and status of outstanding Fire Protection issues in the Safety Evaluation Report (Supplement 1).
The inspection involved 26 inspection-hours on site by one NRC regional based inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
.
i 8202230638 820203 PDR ADOCK 05000322-O PDR
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Long Island Lighting Company J. Aldieri, Test Engineer
- R. DeRocher, QA Specialist
,
H. Eckhart,
- R. Gutmann, Maintenance Engineer (Fire Protection)
J. Kelly, Field QA Manager William Maloney, Plant Engineer
- A. Muller, QC Engineer
- P. Quinan, Mainter ance Coordinator (Fire Protection)
J. Rose, Operational QA Wm. Steiger, Chief Operating Engineer
- D. Terry, Assistant Startup Manager
- R. Wittschen, Licensing Engineer E. Youngling, Startup Manager Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation G. Kaczmarzyk, Safety Engineer
- William Matyek, Lead Advisory Engineer U.S. Nup19ar Regulatory Commission
- J. Higgins, Sr. Resident Inspector
- denotes personnel present at exit meeting 2.
Fire Protection / Prevention Program The inspector reviewed licensee procedures pertaining to the Fire Protection / Prevention Program to determine whether the licensee has developed adequate procedures consistent with the Fire Hazard Analysis, FSAR, Technical Specifications and applicable Codes / Standards.
The inspector noted that the licensee is in the process of developing j
procedures to address the Fire Protection Program.
a.
Procedures in process include:
--
SP-39.500.03 revision B entitled " Fire Protection Program Trainir.;"
.
_
q
..
.
}
3.
SP-39.500.02 revision B entitled " Fire Brigade Organization,
--
Response, Practice and Drills"
--
SP-39.500.04 revision B entitled " Wading River Fire Department Interface"
--
SP-39.500.05 revision B entitled " Control and use of Combustibles" i
--
SP-39.500.06 revision b entitled " Fire Protection Permits, Watches, Patrols and Inspections"
--
SP-39.500.07 revision B entitled " Fire Protection Record System"
--
SP-39.506.01 revision B entitled " Fire Protection Equipment l
Inspection and Maintenance"
--
SP-39.500.01 entitled " Organization and Administration of Fire Protection Program" SP-12.023.01 entitled " Station Housekeeping"
--
--
PT-501.002 entitled " Remote Shutdown Panel Room Total Flooding 1301 Halon System"
--
PT-504.001 dated March 21, 1979 entitled " Smoke, Flame and Temperature Detection System"
--
PT-503.002 entitled "M43 Firemain Distribution System" PT-503.001 entitled " Deluge Fire Protection System"
--
b.
The inspector determined the following procedures to be inadequate as follows:
--
SP-39.500.01 entitled " Organization and Administration of Fire Protection Program" The procedure does not delineate personnel qualifications required for personnel designated to implement the Fire Protection Program.
--
SP-39.506.01 entitled " Fire Protection Equipment Inspection and Maintenance" The procedure is limited to fire extinguishers and fire hoses.
Does not ' list or reference other fire fighting equipment or brigade equipment.
--
SP-39.500.03 entitled " Fire Protection Program Training" The procedure does not address firefighting strategies for safety-related areas and the use thereof in brigade trainin _
.
..
.
--
PT-501.002 entitled " Remote Shutdown Panel Room Total Flooding 1301 Halon Systen" The procedure does not list temperature "before" and "after" as one of the required test parameters necessary in determining Halon concentration.
The licensee has initiated corrective action to revise the procedures referenced above to incorporate the changes noted.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
3.
Status of Outstanding SER Fire Protection Issues The inspector reviewed the status of the following items identified in section 9.5 of the facility Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-0420), Supplement No. 1.
a.
Paragraph 9.5.2.2 - Modification of existing manually actuated deluge system for the HPCI/RCIC equipment area to an automatic pre-action actuation system.
b.
Paragraph 9.5.2.3 - Provide a 30 minute soak time of the CO system
in the relay room (cable spreading room) to ensure extinguishment of a postulated fire.
c.
Paragraph 9.5.3.1 - Provide specific 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> UL approved designs for all fire protection seals used in the penetration cable trays, conduits and piping which have passed the penetration qualification tests specified by ASTM E-119.
d.
Paragraph 9.5.3.2 - Replace all motorized li hour fire dampers which s
are not UL listed with approved listed operators or develop a surveillance program to assure adequate level of reliability, e.
Paragraph 9.5.4 - Install eight-hour battery pack emergency lighting for areas of plant necessary for safe shutdown.
f.
Paragraph 9.5.5.1 - Install emergency shutdown panel so that alternate shutdown capability exists independent of the control room.
g.
Paragraph 9.5.5.2 -
1) Upgrade a shaft in the southeast corner of the cable spreading room, elevation 44'-0, to a 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> fire rated wall and provide 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire dampers for any duct penetrating the shaft.
2) Provide a 30 minute soak time of the CO suppression system.
h.
Paragraph 9.5.5.3 -
1) Provide a secondary water feed from the underground to the reactor building as well as valves such that primary or secondary water fire protection will always be provided.
,
.
..
=.
-
..
. -
.
_
_
..
-
2) Provide a 9 foot high, 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire rated barrier between vertical trays and the adjacent RCIC pump.
i.
Paragraph 9.5.5.5 - Install additional detectors, portable extinguishers and barriers in other plant areas not referenced in the SER but addressed-in the Fire Hazard Analysis.
j.
Paragraph 9.5.6 - Verify "As-built" design has a minimum of 20 ft.
separation between redundant safety-related components.
k.
Paragraph 9.5.7 - Plant Administrative Controls and Procedures to be-implemented prior to fuel load.
As of January 15, 1982, none of the items referenced above have been completed.
Item 3f, Remote Shutdown Panel Room, is almost complete. '
Installation of a seal door and security interlock will complete this item. The licensee has initiated E&DCR for the modifications and purchase
of items noted above. All items are scheduled for completion or resolution prior to fuel load.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
4.
Diesel Fire Pump The inspector reviewed the status of the Diesel Fire Pump reported to have failed ir. the initial startup test performed in October 7-8, 1981.
Licensee repair work order no. M43-51 indicates the licensee has replaced the "A" battery bank.
In addition, the flowmeter snubber piston was replaced to correct the meter response time. A second test on the diesel fire pump was satisfactorily performed on December 8,1981.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
5.
Exit Meeting The inspector met with licensee and construction representatives (denoted in Details, Paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on January 15, 1982 to summarize the scope of the inspection and the inspection findings.
,
~.-
-
.