IR 05000313/1972001
| ML19326B634 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/1972 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Phillips J ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004160408 | |
| Download: ML19326B634 (3) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,f s. .. = A de.wg - - . f ~ ' ' ~ -k UNITED STATES ' - p\\[[*5M . ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION . [ l DIVISION OF COMP!. LANCE 'e
'4 ' REGION 11 - Suit E 018 - % , 2M R E ACMT RE E 3T R EET, NORT HWEST Upts *% AT t. A NT A, GEOHGI A 30303 In Reply Refer To: March 1, 1972 CO:II:VLB 50-313/72-1 [ 50-368/72-1 ' . Arkansas Power and Light Company Attn: Mr. J. D. Phillips Vice President and Chief Engineer . Sixth and Pine Streets Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71601 Gentlemen: . This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. Brownlee and Vallish on January 25-27, 1972, of activities authorized by AEC Construction Permit No. CPPR-57 for the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 facility and o'f your quality assurance program for work to be performed under an exemp- . ) tion from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.10 for the Arkansas Nuclear One, j g U Unit 2 facility.
Our findings were discussed by Mr. Brownlee with Messrs. Moore, Bland, and Bean of your staff, and Messrs. Sly, Loth, and Zampieri of Bechtel Engineering Corporation at the conclusion of the l inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection included installation of electrical and instrumentation components and cable, tlie program for primary loop erection, and installation of the post-tension system, high pressure injection pumps, decay heat cooler, control red drive mechanism for Unit , 1, and construction activities authorized by the construction permit ex-emption for Unit 2.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, inter- ~ iews with site personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
v ' Within the scope of this inspection, there were no items of noncompliance identified.
The inspectors examined the unresolved items identified in our letter of January 28, 1972, relating to separation of safety channel equipment and - the primary coolant pump hydrostatic seal and bearing modification and subsequent performance testing. Compliance has no further questions regarding these items. Examination of the NDT results of the pressurizer top end remains open and vill be included in the scope of future inspections.
.
i
= '- , - p r - + " - ... _ ,, , Arkansas Power and 2-March 1, 1972 Light Company One additional item remained unresolved at the conclusion of this inspec-tion. As discussed with members of your staff, it is our understanding that -you will have an engineering evaluation and stress analysis made of the main steam relief valve mounting, riser and header design to include dynamic reactions. This item will be examined further during subsequent inspections.
A reply to this letter is not necessary; however, should you have any questions concerning this letter, you may communicate directly with this office.
'ery truly yours, , , . J hn G. Davis Director . ! = ' , l
9
i ' i l l r
! .
,... . . . ..- - -. _... _ -. ___ _ ..... , _ /~ ., DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE l' MONTHLY REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 1972
. Arkansas Power & Light Company (Arkansas Nuclear One, ' ' Units 1, 2) - An inspection was conducted on January 25-27 to examine the primary coolant loop erection, and electrical - systems installation.
There were no deficiencies identified during'the inspection.
l l i . - 4 k \\W . - - -. _ .- . - a }}