IR 05000312/1982019
| ML20054F138 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 05/14/1982 |
| From: | Willett D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054F133 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-82-19, NUDOCS 8206150247 | |
| Download: ML20054F138 (4) | |
Text
0-
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No. 50-312/82-19 Docket No. 50-312 License No.
DPR-54 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District j,
,
,
,-
P. O. ' Box 15830
-' * "
'
'
-
,
~*
Sacramento, California 95813
.
.
.
Facility Name: Rancho Seco
- 9
'
,
._
,,
Inspection at:
Clay Station, California
'
2
"
'
'
c.
.
'
'
Inspection conducted:
April 22-23,1982
/
Inspectors:
m$ h N Y - /'/ Y Z.
D~. J. Willett/ Reactor Inspector Date Signed
M 7-
[-/
~
Approved by: &
T. Young, Chief, @ actor Pfjjects-Section 2, Date Signed t
Reactor Operati%s ProjeMs.Wanch Summary:
Inspection on April 22-23, 1982 (Report No. 50-312/82-19)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced.nspection of fire piotection activities and independent inspection effort. This in' 'ection involved 22 inspector-hours by one inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8206150247 820518 PDR ADOCK 05000312 PDR G
.
.,
o
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- R. Columbo, Technical Assistant Manager, Nuclear Operations-H. Schumacher, Safety Technician
- W. Weaver, Assistant Safety Technician-2.
Fire Protection Program In addition to discussions with facility personnel, the inspector reviewed selected portions of the following documents:
Administrative Procedure 29:
"Use and control of combustable materials and igniticn sources" Administrative Procedure 34:
" Fire safety inspection guide"
'
Administrative Procedure 36:
" Rancho Seco Fire Brigade" Maintenance Procedure 113:
" General Welding Standard" Report - Review and evaluation of the fire brigade training program for 1981 Report - Fire protection safety review and evaluation, February,1978 Audit Report, #0-363 - Fire Protection January 1981 Fire brigade drills and training session records Branch Technical Position 9.5.1 Appendix A to Branch Technical Position 9.5.1 Regulatory Guide 1.12G 10 CFR 50 Appendix R The inspector expressed the following concerns; a.
The Rancho Seco Fire Protection Program.does not adequately monitor ignition sources such as welding cutting and brazing because the program does not provide an adequate ' review'and approval process by persons trained and experienced in fire protection.
(82-19-01)
'
.
,,_-
e-y+
-
-
- !
. 1
.
.
-2-b.
The fire protection instructions and training program for fire.
watch personnel does not confonn to the safety review eva'uation report, nor does it provide adequate training or instruction to satisfy accepted industry standards.
(82-19-02)
The licensee has committed to review the fire protection program and evaluate institution of a permit system and fire watch training.
The above items, a and b are considered unresolved.
3.
Independent Inspection During this period, the inspector toured areas of the facility and observed the following items:
a.
Combustible materials were properly controlled.
b.
Flamable and combustable liquid and gas usage was restricted and controlled.
,
.
c.
House keeping was maintained.
~
>
d.
Fire brigade equipment, including emergency breathing. apparatus 'and protective clothing was properly stored and main.tained.
-
,
,
Hydrants, storage tanks and indicator valkes were-adequately protected'
e.
by barriers.
'
i,
,
f.
Yard indicator valves (PIV) and c'ontrol valves were maintaned in, the -
open position.
g.
Access to supression devices was clear.
h.
Equipment and devices indicated current inspection dc es.
i.
The general condition of equipment was acceptable by visual inspection.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations. Unresolved items disclosed during the inspection are discussed in paragraph _ _
.
.
.
i
.
'
.
-3-5.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)-
,
at the conclusion of the inspection on April 23, 1982. The scope and
. findings of the inspection were discussed and summarized as set forth
in Paragraphs 2 through 4.
.
.
i
a
- ,
a
.
w O
p~"
'
'
- f
?
.
e
~
r* _
.'-
^
A *
i,-., +
k._
'
- * r
~
z
.
p-
%
_.
%
,
.._ k- ;
d'
~~
4
,*:',
,x
.
.
r
, - -. -
.
, v.
,
- I (
.
[.
.
?
g
.
,
...
t,
-
-
'
,
,4 s.
.
s.. '
,
e
'
'; >>
'
)
-
l