IR 05000312/1980011

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-312/80-11 on 800407-10.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Area Inspected:Protection Against Industrial Sabotage & Theft of Snm.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML19323G147
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 05/15/1980
From: Norderhaug L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Walbridge W
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 8005300455
Download: ML19323G147 (2)


Text

_

7"/c:

e mog

[

9, UNITED STATES

,.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$. '*

,,E e

o

REGION V

1990 N. CALIFORNI A BOULEVARD 0,%, %# g[g SUITE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

  • e

,*

WALNUT CR EE K, CALIFORNIA 94596

.

MAY 151980

,

Docket No. 50-312 Sacramento Municipal Utility District P. O. Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95830 Attention:

W. C. Walbridge General Manager Gentlemen:

Subject: NRC Inspection This letter refers to the inspection of your activities authorized under NRC License No. DPR-54 conducted by Messrs. L. Ivey and W. P. Mortensen of this office on April 7-10, 1980.

It also refers to the discussion of our inspection findings held by the inspectors with Mr. R. P. Oubre and members of his staff on April 10, 1980 and the telephone conversation with Mr. R. C. Moore on April 21, 1980.

The inspection included examination of activities related to physical protection against industrial sabotage and against theft of special nuclear material in accordance with applicable requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and Materials," your Security Plan, and license conditions pertaining to physical protection as described in the enclosed inspection report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and records, interviews with facility personnel and observatiors by the inspectors.

Within the scope of this inspection, no items of noncompliance were observed.

In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Title 10, Code of Feder'1 Regulations, documentation of the findings of your safeguards and security measures are exempt from public disclosure; therefore, the enclosed inspection report will not be placed in the Pu51ic Document Room.

{

80053 o oif 515 dp

. -

.

Sacramento Municipal Utility District-2-E I s 690 Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, n

U/?

W

. _ '

/

LeRoy R. florderhau, Chief Safeguards Branch Enclosure:

A.

Inspection Report

flo. 50-312/80-11 (IE-V-381)

cc w/o enclosure A:

R. J. Rodriguez, SMUD

L. G. Schwieger, SMUD