IR 05000305/1982001
| ML20052D252 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Kewaunee  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1982 |
| From: | Bob Fitzpatrick, Konklin J, Nelson R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052D244 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-305-82-01, 50-305-82-1, NUDOCS 8205060404 | |
| Download: ML20052D252 (5) | |
Text
,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
..
-
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-305/82-01(DPRP)
Docket No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43 Licensee: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
-
P. O. Box 1200 Green Bay, WI 54305 Facility Name: Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At: Kewaunee Site, Kewaunee, WI Inspection Conducted: January 1-31, 1982
/
s S/Bf/72/
Inspectors:
R. L Nelson r f /D
'
'
B. E l'tzpatri S/2f/78
'
'
d43 Approved By:
J.
nk'lin, Chief j.//6/73_-
.
'
'
actor Projects Section 2A Inspection Summary Inspection on January 1-31, 1982 (Report No. 50-305/82-01(DPRP))
Areas Inspected: Routine, resident inspection of operational safety
,
verification, monthly maintenance observation, monthly surveillance
'
observation, independent inspection, headquarters requests, receipt of new fuel, and regional requests. The inspection involved a total of 142 inspecr% -hours onsite by two NRC inspectors including 35 in-spector-hours onsite during off-shifts.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
.
8205060404 820312 PDRADOCK05000g c
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
"
.
,
.
,
-
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- D.
C. Hintz, Plant Manager M. C. Marchi, Technical Supervisor R. W. Lange, Superintendent, Maintenance
- C.
R. Steinhardt, Superintendent, Operations W. J. Richmond, Plant Services Superintendent D. W. McSwain, Assistant Superintendent, Instrument and Control K. H. Evers, Reactor Supervisor
-
- A.
J. Ruege, Quality Control Supervisor
- D.
J. Molzahn, Technical Services Engineer The inspectors also talked with and interviewed members of the Opera-tions, Maintenance, Health Physics, Instrument and Control, and Security Groups.
- Denotes those attending one or more exit interviews.
2.
Operational-Safety Verification The inspector observed control room operations, reviewed applicable logs and conducted discussions with control room operators during the month of January. The inspector verified the operability of selected emergency systems, reviewed tagout records and verified proper return to service of affected components. Tours of the containment auxiliary and turbine buillings were conducted to observe plant equipment conditions, including potential fire hazards, fluid leaks, and excessive vibrations and to verify that maintenance requests had been initiated for equipment in need of maintenance.
The inspector by observation and direct interview verified that the physical security plan was being implemented in accordance with the station security plan.
The inspector observed plant housekeeping / cleanliness conditions and verified implementation of radiation protection controls.
During the month of January, the inspector walked down the accessi-ble portions of the auxiliary feedwater, fire protection, service water, emergency diesel generator, high head safety injection, con-tainment spray, residual heat removal, component cooling, spent fuel
.
pit cooling and radiation monitoring systems to verify operability.
,
These reviews and observations were conducted to verify that facility operations.were in conformance with the requirements established under technical specifications, 10 CFR, and administrative procedures.
No items of noncompliance were identified in this area.
-
__
"
.
. ~
-
-
.
3.
Monthly Maintenance Observation Station maintenance activities of safety related systems and com-
'
ponents listed below were observed / reviewed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved procedures, regulatory guides and industry codes or standards and in conformance with technical specifications.
The following items were considered during this review: -the limiting conditions for operation were met while components or systems were removed from service; approvals were obtained prior to initiating the work; activities were accomplished using approved procedures and were
-
inspected as applicable; functional testing and/or calibrations were performed prior to returning components or systems to service; quality control records were maintained; activities were accomplished by qualified personnel; parts and materials used were properly certified; radiological controls were implemented; and, fire prevention controls were implemented.
Work reques's were reviewed to determine status of outstanding jobs and to assure that priority is assigned to safety related equipment maintenance which may affect system performance.
The following maintenance activities were observed / reviewed:
MWR 02-18807, Repack Service Water Strainers NWR 14-18831, IB Zone Special Ventilation Exhaust Fan will not Start-Replaced Solenoid Valve MWR 36-18768, Pressurizer Level Out of Specification-Recalibrate MWR 23-18786, ICS 6B Will Not Close-Cleaned Contacts No items of noncompliance were identified in this area.
4.
Monthly Surveillance Observation The inspector observed the following surveillance testing: SP 55-155, Engineered Safeguards Logic Channel Test; SP 23-100, Containment Spray Pump Test and verified that testing was performed in accordance with adequate procedures, that test instrumentation was calibrated, that limiting conditions for operation were met, that removal and restora-tion of the affected components were accomplished, that test results conformed with technical specification and procedure requirements and were reviewed by personnel other than the individual directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during the testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel.
No items of noncompliance were identified in this area.
!
i r
,
.
e 5.
Independent Inspection The inspectors conducted a general inspection of operations, main-tenance, health physics, security, quality assurance, and adminis-trative activities.
The inspectors identified one item in the area of security which is discussed in the attachment to this report (Safeguards Information).
6.
Headquarters Requests The inspectors performed inspections and reviewed activities concern-ing pressurizer power operated relief valve control circuitry and diesel fuel oil sampling.
7.
Receipt of New Fuel The inspector verified, prior to receipt of new fuel, that technically adequate, approved procedures were available covering the receipt, inspection, and storage of new fuel; he also observed receipt in-spections and storage of new fuel elements and verified that these activities were performed in accordance with the licensee's proced-ures; and he followed up resolutions of deficiencies as found during new fuel inspections.
No items of noncompliance were identified in this area.
8.
Regional Request The inspectors performed inspection and review in the following activities:
(a) prompt public notification / warning system and testing of the system (refer to Inspection Report 50-305/82-03);
(b) diesel generator governor oil level checking instructions.
The inspectors reviewed a December 7, 1981 memorandum from J. L. Crews, Director, Division of Resident, Reactor Projects and Engineering Inspection, NRC, subject:
Inadequate Instructions for Checking Oil Level of Diesel Generator Governor (AITS F0520013).
The review indicated the Kewaunee Plant's emergency diesels do not use the referenced Woodward governor. The Kewaunee diesels use a Woodward Model UG8 governor and the control of oil level is clearly explained in the Woodward Governor Company's Bulletin No. 03004G.
This bulletin is referenced in all applicable maintenance procedures, in addition, a Woodward Governor Company training course has been
. attended within the past 12 months by all mechanics and electricians who may have occasion to work on the governor.
J
.
.-
.
.
.__
.
.
.
t
,
.
.
..
-
.
t r
9.
Exit Interview
!
l l
.The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph
1) throughout the month and at the conclusion of the inspection f
January 29, 1982, and summarized the scope and findings of the in-i
<
spection activities.
i ATTACHMENT:
Safeguards
Information l
,
T
[
P f
I i
i P
j
".
i t
,
i t
9 l
[
l
'
!
!
'
I
<
b
- .
>
a
,
,, -
-,
. - -
..n..
.,, - --
,-,
v.
.,
y,