IR 05000298/1994020

Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-298/94-20 on 940711-15 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Mgt Effectiveness & Support,Protected Area Barrier & Assessment Aids,Records & Repts & Security Plan & Procedure

ML20149F601
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper
Issue date:	07/27/1994
From:	Murray B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149F566	List: IR 05000298/1994020 ML20149F563 ML20149F585
References
50-298-94-20, NUDOCS 9408110034
Download: ML20149F601 (2)

Text

. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

!

!.

l !

I DOCUMENT CONTAINS

! j APPENDIX B f U.S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

REGION IV

Inspection Report: 50-298/94-20 Operating Licenses: DPR-46  !

!

Licensee: Nebraska Public Power District -

P.O. Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68602-0499

Facility Name: Cooper Nuclear Station Inspection At: Brownville, Nebraska ,

Inspection Conducted: July 11-15, 1994 Inspector: T. W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist  ;

Facilities Inspection Program Section '

l Approved:

Bra <

/[ @ ][/[/8/.///

ne Murray, / Chief Dhte Reactor Inspection B Inspection Summary Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the licensee's physical security program. The areas inspected within the physical security program included management effectiveness, management support, protected area barrier and assessment aids, records and reports, access control of personnel and packages, lighting, security plans and procedures, and followup on previously identified inspection finding Results:

• Overall management of the plant security program was very goo Responsiveness to concerns was timely and effective. The 31-day continuous behavioral observation program requires additional management attention (Section 1.1).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED 9408110034 940 sos PDR ADOCK 05000298 G PDR

<

.

,

-2- DOCUMENT CONTAINS * The protected area barrier and isolation zones were well maintained (Section 1.2)

• Assessment aids provided effective coverage of the perimeter detection zones. The overall picture quality of the cameras and the monitors was very good (Section 1.3)

• Instrumentation and Control technicians repaired or replaced security equipment in a timely manner. Compensatory posting was kept to a minimum because of excellent response by Instrumentation and Control technicians to repair equipment problems (Section 1.4).

• A violation was identified concerning the continuous behavioral observation progra Security management was very knowledgeable of reporting requirements. Negative trends were identified and sound resolutions developed to prevent recurrence (Section 1.5).

• Security lighting in the protected area and isolation zone was very good, and compensatory measures were implemented when required (Section 1.6).

• Changes to security plans did not decrease their effectiveness and were effectively incorporated into procedures (Section 1.7).

• Positive control was maintained over personnel and vehicles entering the i protected area. Thorough searches were performed for firearms, explosives, incendiary devices, and other unauthorized material (Section 1.8).

Summarv of Inspection Findinas:

• Violation 298/9420-01 wasopened(Section1.5).  !

• Violation 298/9321-01 was closed (Section 2).

• Licensee Event Report 93-S01 was closed (Section 2).

Attachment:

Attachment - Persons Contacted and Exit Meeting DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

-

!