IR 05000269/1985038
| ML20138N917 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/1985 |
| From: | Bryant J, Dance H, King L, Sasser M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138N863 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-85-38, 50-270-85-38, 50-287-85-38, NUDOCS 8512240208 | |
| Download: ML20138N917 (8) | |
Text
g,,
.;_
-
_ _...
-
-
-_y
-*
,
,
. ' in Mouf*o.
'
J.
UNITE 3 STATES -
s
,
'Li NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
"
i[
g-
- REGION il
- -
- 0 101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.'
Ib
' ATLANTA,GEonGIA 30323
+._*****/
- _
.
-
-
.
Report.Nos:'.50-269/85-38, 50-270/85-38, and-50-287/85-38
.' Lice'nse' : Duke Power Company.
e 422iSouth Church Street Charlotte,.N.C. :28242
-
.
!FacilityName: 'Oconee Nuclear Station-
~
-
p
<DocketfNos.: 150-269, 50-270, and 50-287
- License Nos.:
DPR-38, DPR-47, and.DPR-55 Inspection: Conducted: November-12 - December 9, 1985 Inspectors:
A
/
C J. C. B/yaht F
Ddte S'igned
"-
f]W [
3lg-f p
M. K. Sass 7:
Dath Sfgned t%b1fb'f
'
W
^L.
P.
ing 1
--
Dat( Signed
"
W
/
/3 [
' 'dpproved'by:
' H.-C. Dance,-3ection Chief Dat6 Signed
-
' Division of Reactor Projects
.
L SUMMARY f.
Scope: This 1 routine, announced inspection. entailed 146 inspector-hours on -site in -the areas ' of. operations, 'su'rveillance, maintenance, startup testing of the
.
isafe shutdown < facility, and LER review.
g Results: Of the five areas inspected, no. items of noncompliance or deviations
<were identified.
_
' f
.
P
.
A
-
,
.
,
L'
'-
...
.. u.
.
.
.
.
. -
-
-
gq g - 1 mw c-
.
-:
--
-
+ -
-
_
e be n
.
'
'
b
,
- , _
<
"
g.
-f j.y
,
.
e
'
(REPORT DETAIL?
,
,
,
, fli
? Licensee-Employees: Contacted
- '?M.S. Tuckman? Station' Manager
'
~
>*J.N.: Pope,: Superintendent of.0perations.
- 4T.S.'Barr, Superintendent;of Technical. Services
- T.B;E0 wen,; Superintendent'of Maintenance
.
JR.T.; Bond,3 ompliance Engineer-
-
C
~
,
' *T; C.! Matthews, 'Techni cal - Special i st 1
(H.R.ilowery,)-Shift Operati.ng Engineer
-
'
Otherblidense'e employees.co'ntacted -included ' technicians, operators,
,
.; mechanics,: security-force members, and staff engineers.
-
~.
1 Resident:Inspectorsi
.
'
' '*J.ChBryant'
'*M.K.:Sasser 1*L.P. King.
,
L
-.
...:
'* Attended exit-interview.
.
.
J 2.
' Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on December-10, 1985;with Ltho'seipersons indicated in paragraph-1 above. The licenseeLdid'not identify
' = asiproprietaryf anyi of.L.the. materials prov.ided to ' or reviewed by- *the
11nspectors;during this= inspection.
53.c fi.icensee ction'on Previous Enforcement Matters
,
(Closed)- Violation /85-10-01:
Control Rod Position Limits. The inspectors
,
t. verified that Lall corrective' actions specified have been satisfactorilyt
,
-
' l completed.- This, item 11s closed.
' ~ 4.1 Unresolved Items
' Unres'olved items were not-identified on this inspection.
-
- 5 '.
Plant' Operations-
-~ -
t.
LThe inspectors reviewed plant operations throughout the reporting period to
-
- verify?conformance with regulatory requirements, Technical Specifications
'
/ (TS), ? andi adm.inistrative_ controls.
Control' room logs, shift turnover
-
.
' records and' equipment. removal f and restoration records were reviewed routinely.. Interviews were conducted with plant operations, maintenance, l chemistry, health physics and performance personnel.
-
,, -
-
-
.
.
-
.
- -
m
,
-
-
. - -
- - - - - - - - -.
--
-
+
h.~
_,
'
'
.-
y#K~
~
2:
.o Activities within the control, rooms were monitored on an almost daily basis.
-
f Ins"pecti' ns ;were. conducted on : day and 'on night-shifts,- during week days and -
~
o ron weekends. LSomeiinspections were made during' shift' change in~ order to
-
evaluate 4 shift ' turnover performance.
Actions observed were conducted as.
- required ; by
- Operations. Management Procedure _2-1.
The complement of-l licensed personnel on-each shift inspected met or exceeded the requirements ~.
x ofJTS; Operators were responsive to - plant.' annunciator alarms and were
'
cognizantsof1 plant conditions.
-Plant tours were taken'throughout the reporting period on a routine basis.
-
The areas toured included the;following:
Turbine Building:
- Auxiliary Building Units 1, 2, and 3 Penetration Rooms
' Units 1,2, and 3~ Electrical Equipment._ Rooms
. Units 1,2, and 3 Cable Spreading Rooms-
~ Station. Yard l Zone within.the Protected Area Standby Shutdown-Facility
,
Keowee Hydro Plant-E During the. plant. ; tours, ongoing activities, housekeeping, security, equipment status,-and radiation-control ~ practices were observed.
-
Lunit' 1Tand - 2 remained at essentially 100*4 power-throughout the reporting
-
period, November 12 to December 9,=1985.
Unit 3; began the ' report period shutdown for_ replacement of a main turbine
~
^
.
-
bearing; As ' the unit _ was.being shut down --a steam -generator tube leak
- ~
ideveloped. The leaking tubeFand another.which demonstrated reduced wall thickness 'in' A" steam : generator, were plugged. The turbine bearing wa's
~
replaced end th$ uniC made critical 'at 4:47 p.m.Lon November 16. It reached
.100*4 power at 11:14 a.m. on November 17.
Unit 3 ' wated et 100% power until 8:43 p.m. on November 24 when it was-
shut?dovn for 'f ailure of ' main turbine bearing No.
1, the same bearing
- position whicn had failed previously.
During extensive examination, the Licensee found no specific <cause for the bearing' failure. No condition was found - that was not within tolerance.
In order to eliminate possible i contributing factors,1two oil lift pumps were ~ replaced, the journal, was machined, all bearings ' inspected, and efforts made to provide. perfec'
alignment of the shaft. At the end of the report pe'iod, work was nearint
>
completion and it is anticipated that Unit 3 will be.on line by December 13.
~
No ' violations or deviations were identified.
f 4;
m
-
-
W&' _
}
~
~
yp vg*
^
'
, -
,
- %l q'W "
-
-
'
c
,
.+
'
3-g
.
o
+
-
L 6.1 iSurveillance Testing;
.
.
LThe z surve111ance ' tests l'isied f below!were-reyiewed and/or1 witnessed byl the
-
, -
~ ; inspectors :to verify - procedural; and _ performance adequacy.
The completed
.; tests? reviewed were examined forEnecessary, test prerequisites, instructions, facceptance ? criteria,' technical content, cauthorization.toL begin -work, data-fcollection, (independent verification < where required,. handling _of-
- deficienciesinoted, iand ' review of completed _ work. - The : tests : witnessed,.in LwholeLorfin part,'were? inspected to determine that approved procedures.were:
~
,.
.
iavailable, test equipment was! calibrated,. prerequisites were met,7 tests were
'
' conducted according to procedure,; test results were acceptable.and systems
~
irestoration_was completed.
-
-
- c Surve'111ances witnessed'in wholeaor;in part are as' follows:
v PT/0/A/0150/008 Reactor _ Building Personnel Lock Leak' Rate Test, m
--
Unit 2
'
-
PT/0/A/0610/02=,
-ExternallGrid Trouole Protection System Logic and Switchyard Isolation Logic Test
.
T LSurveillance tests reviewed were:
i
-
.m
.
WR 51511'D-Read Senscr Voltages for Reactor Building Normal-
-
'
' '.
_
l Sump Level Sensors
- 41 '
PWR-57126 C! 3
~ Install.Strongbacks for Performance-of Personnel
'
Hatch Leak' Rate Test-WRL55053'A Perform.E/S System Logic Sub System 1, LPI
'
'
Channe113 On-line Instrument Calibration WR:55052 A Perform E/S System Logic Sub System 1,'HPI and
,
RV' Isolation, Channel 1, 0n-line:Instrumenti p
Calibration'
'
~
WR' 55319 : A-Perform:Cor'e Flood Tank Pressure Instrument :
Calibrat"on Required by Technical' Specification-4.1.1 s
' ~
- N,o violations or deviations were identified.
+
t
'
'7.
Maintenance Activities n.
'
. Maintenance activities were observed and/or ' reviewed during. the ' reporting period to. verify-that work was" performed by qualified personnel and _that Lapproved procedures in use adequately-described work that was not within the
- skillcof the Ltrace., Activities, procedures and work requests were examined
'
'
~ to - verify i proper authorization-to begin work, provisions for. fire,
-cleanliness,/and-exposure control,- proper return of equipment to' service, g
y f and tha'. limiting conditions for operation were met.
"
'
'
_
' I.
&
1 s
b:
-
.
- ---
.-
-
-- --
.J
-
WD& N%[l&~p f T s ' v 4Q~,
' O.
-
- .
L
.
lh. q -ggf%
~
,
gnn b
s
'
<
~
,
,
'~~
-
%'
','#
l
,
-
'
.
ww www,
'
a *
- C ny m
'
w
,
, -
-<
,
,
9QMQ% g-
>
i
@O;%['.gl,., i;$d ? ' --
,,
jd
'
>
-
~*
- '
' *
' '"
3.
,
,.
x m
y
.- -
.
.-
,y@qs
%;
we c
'g y~ 7
-
.4-
-
9.:w~
<.
,
3,,
c
.
,
- ..
k
, gl$y-fh ^ f,I
-
,
.
,
,
d LN
~
g es4h-4[C-'aintenance procedures: reviewed weref
_
.;
y y
M[h S U fry a'
M ': - E ' Q
.,... ~
$ 's n
,
'
giWy,
e
-
,-
'
,
.
R $ Q J 'r &WRT23756 Bi f JInspectlCibles'in; Penetration 1-C-F-73 for
~ '
!
A Of
[A M'. L LJ
.
i
' 4WRi54883 C f
' ^. JVisible Damage
.
-
- jM i ',
4WRi57517)A;s M
2 (Repair Electricall Penetration1 C-F-90
,
$' J:
JPerform PMion Breaker TC-9,L" Low Pressure
'
-
,
,
.-
gP A *
1.
. 1
,JInfection/ Motor 3A":
'~
Mf? "' f~ p; 7 ; n WRi57516 AI~ '
, - Perform PM on Breaker 3TC-8,<"High._ Pressure;
%
.
Injection MotorL3A".
-
(WR(57557JCL -
Perform Mle'TestiofxTransformer Bus 2,' Unit. 3,
%1
,_-
_
,
M
%:4:
a?.
_.. s3B2T-2..
'.. '..
..
.
...
.-
t 75 W _;WR 52778;DJ G, JAssistil&Elin Testing;SSF Diesel; Instrumentation
t,g A sf
@g ; 4 ',:
.
.J
~
l u
S
/4 No-' violations'or: deviation $wereident1fied.
~
y, a
^
- '
,
'
-
,
-
V!N: [8M/ReahoriBuihiinglSpray}Va'1ves
'
t g'
my 3 ' ;,,
7'
. _,
i' - W.N SA ? Duke;PoweriCompany1, design / review off 0conee electrical loads? determined
-
@
' -}thathundercertainconditionss of degraded.Lsysteml voltage, thelpower supply
>
'
,< y D ' w itojreactor buildilng # spray 1 valves might bel:. inadequate to-open; theXvalves
,
i
? D ' 1 g jimmediatelyTunder? accident conditions. Specifically,1 valve 2BS-2!wasifound:
y<q.
Cinadequate and'the' remaining five valves,atwo in;ea'ch unit,;were determined
^
..
tolbe < marginal t i;The; valves; involvedeare,J in iUnit 1, !1BS-11 and 1185-2; in
E
~
y
^. ' N Uni,tl2 N2BS-1 Land!2BS-2;iand.in: Unit 3 f3BS-11and 385-2.'
w
,
.
_-
%
ObY
-.-.c y
,.,a
--'
?y 3f x. ( AtJ 5:45ip;m.1on L November l19, valve ' 285-2 wasideclared inoperabic, thus-OM; Jplacinglunit 2 in"aili_miting ' condition' forf operation. On November 20, Lit" C
'
,. -
s L wasidecid(dito 'operateiwith all jsixfspray valves;open until furtherf action
'
'
-
p 4'p 7r :could?bettakenito cimprovelthe1 voltage; situation. 'The valves are-normally
.
-
(closededuringE reactor Loperationland Jopen :;automatica11yf ath10. psig. _
I
'
- containment pressure. LThe; building ; spray.pumpstalsoLstart at;that pressure?.
w;
<
s TF_c
- The111censee sijustification3 or/ operating;in th.simanner islthat1the spray;
!!
f
%s 2?
system isCanyaccidentimitigating system and,)asjsuchfdoes not require thet g & _ Q; double?; boundary isolation ' of ' non-accidentrmitigating; sys
'
gM
.
+
iTechnicalf Spectfications,. Table 4.4.1,istate ethat the~ check valveslinf the V Jm-V' 'actio'nhwas. tot replace the? power. cables L to; the ~ valve operatorsEwith'
_
ispraylsystemJare used ^ forlcontainmentMisolation. - Permanent corrective
?."'
'
'
m ! considerably heaviericable,'thusireducing'line;1oss. This action'was taken:
'
'
,,,
,,
A F
?on' bothivalves on each unit.' iThe Evalves were ttested iand' rt; turned to the t
,
? l' %
gnormallylclosed position by November 24.
s c $e.
- ',
-
e
,i-
-
~
.
+
- M L
,
(Nolviolation'sdrdeviations;wereiidentified.
e
.
M w 1.
.
.
'
r 4.9.
w[KeoweeiHydro' Unit No. 2.Out of. Service
,
.
v,-
,
'w o
..
.
--
.,
- Keowee= Unit 2 was-taken.out of' service.at 4
- 20 p.m. on November 19, due to a N
- 1
,
wi T
burned: field; coil pole connecting -strap.. Technical ' Specifications (TS)
Qy M *, cpermitfo'ne Keoweef unit to be 'out-of. service ' for 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
ve
-
-
TS 'also permit
<
shutdownfofsone Keowe'e unit'for maintenance for a period of up to 45 daystat
,
m n w
,
,,
[' k-_f Q
^ ^ '
&,
.
$
' '.~
..
3-
-
"
- w m
.
l g --
,e
,
fi
-
t-,'
.
u
"
f;
's
,
,
J
m;;
,,
y.
p-;.... *
- (1
'9( -, :
+-
.1
,.
,
>
s
. ry
" 'O
' -
-n
-
,
.2--
-
-
.
----.s
.,,
'
- -
6 &mS O b.' s+m '
V U ',-
g nm
-
<y-y,
--
,
~
-4 n.
~
,
,
-
-
g_
,gjg;~
q - ' p ' g-3 A;y:.
n
p s @g W; p ; < n -
?
-
w
-
a
'
+
-
'
,
,
n
' ' ' x, * ' gl [ * s &f f'"
~
'
'
byW ; s.:
. -am w
.:-
-~
w b.-
v.
n
.p
,-
$,~ d a h
y
'
'
,
m -
'
m
-
.
n57
,
ypy g g.
xy -:
y-s=
+
,
'O
~
, %: ;
" Q H % ;d S,K
.,
4.Q ' '
.,.W?
,
-.
,., -
-
.
W
,
$ 1(f '@t$reeiyeariintervalsSwithoutiprior;NRC. approval.
Unit'2'was shut:down:for
~ m l maintenancex for}about? 20 ? days:lin 11984.' ; Ford the c current" repai rs, f the.
( jlicenseefwasjpermittedfto. extend the::72 ho_ur? period,/ifine'cessary,1without-a,
.
%s, ) W-(an emergencylTS Jchange,vsince La 45 day shutdownjwas:already analyzed and 'a i
" *
1, 7 portion!ofdthel45 daysthad?n'ot been used. :RepaiFsinscessitated' removing the--
.
'
% yg. generator ~rotos The; generator was.-repaired:and Keowee Unit 2 returned to:
~
,
W aservicefat.5:55!a.m.Jon November.27.
T
-
a
-
_a
,;
,
._%
- ,.....-q
.. ~,-
_
4 y% _ ?lon [ Licensee 1EventL Reports
- ,
pc y:n _,
q. w..
.. %
.
.
..
_.
@ -
/ qThelinspectors breviewediinonroutine. event? reportsf toi verify the report-
~
.
_
^
s N idetailsj met { license frequirements, -. identified thef cause Kof Athef event,.
.
-
- J. W
- described (correctivef action's lapprog riata foMthe -idenfified cause, and
- d
@ Q *1-Ladequatelyfaddres' sed the ~ event :and_ 'anyD generic implications. In addition, l
y3 Mas appropriate Mthe! inspectors examined (operating and maintenance logs,^a'nd-
~
s PI D j ' irecords:andLinternalLinvesti_gation reports, g%gf w
~
'
. W NPersonnel[wereIihterviewedito;vertfy that the report accurately. reflected
'
,t'4 kthe-circumstances ofLthe event,.that;the corrective action had been taken.or
,
,4 1 fresponsibilityfassign'ed Lto assureJcompletion, -and that 1the M evedt 'was'-
[
e
,
,
f1
.;reviewedbylthe.; licensee,JasistipulatedintheTechnical' Specifications.The'
p
.
@n, M,,;followinglevent reports 1wereJreviewed:.
~
-
e
-
((Closed)hlE_R270)85O3[ Rod.IndexCurve.LimitViolated: The' inspectors-T i
%
r
<
qc i verifiedithat/all; corrective actions specified have~been. satisfactorily-
-Ecompleted; cThis item is' closed.
-
& -
r..
..-
>
- %qg-((Closed)? LER 270/83-03S
- Valve: Failed Dueto-Bent--Stem: f The inspectors n
,
i M, ;
J reviewed ? the1 corrective 1'? actions f and E verified that' all. have !been.
i
.
'
(MQ s
,3 completed. mThis item isl closed.
-
~ '
- yn
-
-
,
._
.,
.
- . E(Open) jLER'270/82-10f Stuck Suction Relief f onithe "2B" MFWP,1After a
g:p ?
"s.
5 jgN ReactorjTrip; JThisiincident resulted 1in ' the upper. surge 7 ank -level; t
'
' ' WM
_
- falling ( below"technicall specificationilimits. ' Only Vone Toutstandin'g
- commitment ' remains. - Station Modification 1584 has been
- installed, but.
w m
,
W i.<
ldoes(not; work satisfactorily. Until; operational? problems are resolved.
l stheLER williremain open.
,
,
,
+
_
,
_
,
EJ'
411.x Motor Operated Val _ve (MOV) Torque. Switch Setpoints
~
v jw
'
1for"selectingksetting,2 and; maintaining _ swi.tch setpoints on safety related
Th residentslinitiatedIinspectionfefforts to review the licensee!s'programL i
- q ("
A
,
.J
- MOV'.s.i Discussions to;date have centored on the licensee's basis : for.
n
~5h;[
P R currentlylused_torqueLswitch setpoints. Additional plans are to investigate-
[
i
-
Lyalve histories,f vendor frecommendations; and _ licensee valve functional
- , f testingitoensurelthat;switchsetpointswillaccomodate.maximumdifferential E
s pj{ <
_ l ? pressures l expected during both normal and abnormal. occurrences.
'
Q~%
w
.
-
'
"'
,
,
,
,m
-
'* U
.
lV s
,
bb
_
i.
sta,
' & MW
.:q
-
.
..
$
'lC
l s .. , A - , - +Q< + i 7qw s.
. _.
.a s s .{ps e t *,. s._ ~."r . '- .s < <.... .. - -. .
-
W.p e n * :,. s .. .. -. --
= - - - - - , s. g
j g_ _ _ r , , 6-T ^ lA'ny fihdings'will be reviewed with' the. licensee in light of the recently ~ ' cm - issued IE Bu111 tin' No.185-03: LMotor 0peratedLValve Common Mode Failures- ' -
- During Plant > Trans1_ents Due, to ; Improper' Switch Settings. 'Results will be discus'ed;in theLnext monthly report.
s , 112'; Facility Modifications (37701) , , (ThA inspectors' contin'ue'd their review of ~selacted test procedures performed ' ~ iduring checkout of, the Standby Shutdown Facility (SSF). The previous report ~11sted ; incorrectly 7 est. Procedure TT/2/A/0400/07-SSF RC Makeup Pumps Flow.
T - Verification. Tests. l The correct' number-for that 'est is TT/2/A/0400/07A.
1 Additional. tests reviewed were: . TT/1/A/0400/10 SSF - Unit 1 Transfer of Control Test - ^ ~ ,- TT/1/A/0400/07 SSF ; Unit'1 RCiMakeup Pump Performance Test . TT/3/A/0400/07-SSF - Unit 3 RC Makeup Pump Performance Test I.n artest performed.on Unit-1 RC makeup pump. on November 23, 1984, the pump i - provided 24.25-. gpm" at: 2275' psig.
In a'.May. 17, 1984'te'st,. the Unit.'3 RC.
, _ Lmakeup Jpump provided-23.5 gpm flow.at 2500 psig. The auxiliary service : . " water' pump delivered: 1750 gpm at 1110 psig as-described in the system- = man'ual s.
- The. previous report. mentioned the1 requirements of IE Bulletin 79-23 which
'pointediout. a= potential diesel' generator failure and' specified a 24 hour full load t test. and " requested a response.from the111censee on certain ' circuitry" questions. 3 At the time 'of the-bulletin issuance, Oconee brd no ~ emergency diesels; however,'it is ' assumed that the bulletin appl.ies to the - .SSF diesel'.
The inspector _ reviewed the' diesel manufacturer's test results as prescribed by? Duke-Power Company; ' Included in' these tests was-a full power load test conducted on.0ctober 16 and 17,. -1980 at the Power Systems Division of Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. :The data show that the Oconee diesel-generator-wes operated ~ continuously for 22. hours at 3500 kW (the full power . rating) and then for 2 hours at'3850 kW (110%). The data show that v'oltage Land frequency requirements' were constant-in each of the test periods, and ,that' cooling water' temperature and stator temperatures met requirements.
~ - LIn an' internal - letter of Octo'ber 25, 1979, concerning Bu11etin. 79-23', the- - ~ Llicensee Dstated that. corrections had not been made between low KVA rated. transformers 1 and' high KVA. emergency diesel generators" without adequate - 11 imitations ~ on L the flow of circulating currents.- The inspector has Lrequested the licensee to verify that the in place Oconee diesel generator wiring _ meets-the' requirements of Bulletin 79-23. The results will be.given ~ in a subsquent: report.
. t u -- _, - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..-.-.-- -.x -- - - - - - - . - - - - . - - -. . -.. - - - - -. - - - - -.. - - . - - -- -.a - -. - - - - -- ...
mmm x- . m - ' p
, - ~ - -
- p y~m
,. ' w;v . " ~ p " p.
, ,
- - 7' _ .
i -
l131 > Low.Presaure Injection:(LPI) Pump.
' '
- Whiletconducting a fsurveillance'. t'est' of the IC LPI pu'mp
- on October 4, i
k:. ' operations personnel noticed excessive' noise and below normal flow when the- @ pumpJ was started.
The l pump ' was.' immediatelyE stopped ~and, a subsequent.. . "~. ~ -: investigation _resulted in finding sLction1 valve ILP-7fclosed rather than-in- ' the required open position. The valve -lineup was rechecked and the pump , ' f test'.was'then satisfactorily completed.
Further review revealed that the; " ~ - 11nitial valve ^ lineup and test 1 preparation was' completed by theLnight shift . . '
- prior. togtesting -by. the day shift. The' initial lineup. required the pump to be vented and that ILP-7-be left open'. However, operations -vented the. pump
.and then closed ILP-7.as is;usually-done in normal venting procedures. The' R ~ lineup'was'not reverified by eitherfthe day shift operations or performance- ' ( -groups / prior to starting the pump. The" licensee has reviewed and documented e thel incident and is-taking corrective-:actionso to ~ prevent i recurrence.
Pending c review ^of cthe corrective actions this will be identified ' as - - ' - Jinspector ifollowup f item ' 269/85-38-01, Abnormal Operation of Low Pressure -. Injection Pump.
. .. 14. : Onsite; Review Group (403018) - . m - - LThe review = of - the' onsite safety review; group - was completed.' -A review was
- ' made? ofo a : computer. : printout of all operating experience documentation-
-received at10conee.. This was reviewed by the OSRG - and ' screened for; - iapplicableLinformation. 'It was then forwarded to the' designated individual-in the: responsible. group.
' ~ Al followup on. the review of in planti activities. for the~ purpose. of - F identifying deficiencies, determined that:assigments 'were made by the OSRG - Jchairman which-would cover-this area.
' < ,. ,
- No' violations'or? deviations were ide'ntified.
, '., < ,l'. [. 'h
(
L4 . . ' kw . }}