IR 05000263/1974007

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-263/74-07 on 741002.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effluent Samples
ML20024G135
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/21/1974
From: Greger L, Jorgensen B, Pagliaro J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20024G131 List:
References
50-263-74-07, 50-263-74-7, NUDOCS 9102070569
Download: ML20024G135 (6)


Text

...-_

..

..

.

. _. -.-

-.

_..-..

_.

.

- _ -

. _ - -

.

s

+

-

F

,

U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

,

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS-ve

-,

,4

p..-

j

.

~

12,GION III

'

Report of Independent Measurements Inspection RO Inspection Report No. 050-263/74-07

'

.

Licensee: Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401

.

Monticello Nucicar Generating Plant License No. DPR-22

~

Monticello, Minnesota Category: C

.-

Type o'f Licensee:

BWR (GE) 545 MWe

-

Routine, Announced Type of Inspection:

Independent Measurements

-

.

Date of Inspection:

October 2, 1974

$we * w Mt

,9.,,,

-

..

,,

.

..,

,

,

.,

.

,

Dates of Previous Inspection:

July 16-18, 1974 (Operations)

b)s'R12-

/C/ 2/7[

'

Principal Inspector:

B. L.

o nsen

.

.,

v ~..

'(D6te);

/

/I Accompanying Inspector:

. R. Gre r (Dat'e)'

O'ther Accompanying Personnel: None

.

f444

-

'

I LI[7N Reviewed By:

Asse A. Pagliaro enior Environmental Scientist (Date)

Environmental and Special Projects Section

.

I s

.

en I

9102070569 741022 PDR ADOCK 05000263 G

PDR

,-

- - - - -,. _. - - - -..

-

-n,

,.,~a,,..-, - -..., - _,,.. -.

, -.., -.. - -..,, -.

....,,,~n.,,-

-,+,e

,

..

_.

.

-

_=

-

- ___

_

-

. -.

.

.

.

-

..

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

'

Enforcement Action:.None.

,

T'

Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters '

No previously identified enforcement items within the scope of this inspection.

\\

Unusual occurrences

.

None within the scope of this inspection.

Other Significant Findings A.

Current Findings The licensee's analytical results when compared to the AEC

'

-

Reference Laboratory results for the ef fluent samples pertinent to this inspection are all " acceptable" under the AEC " Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements."

B.

Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items No previously reported unresolved items within the scope of this inspection, p

, ap@ps

  1. -===ement Interview

%

,cp+

,

A manaEcment interview was held with Messrs. Eliason and Jacobson at the conclusion of the inspection on October 2,1974, and via telephone with Mr. Larson on October 8, 1974. The following items were discussed with the licensee representatives.

"'

.

A.

The inspector discussed the scope and nature of the program and presented the licensee with copies of the AEC " Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements." The licensee acknowledged the comments.

(Paragraph 2, Attachment 1)

B.

The inspector discussed the results of comparisons mado pertinent to this inspection, noting that all of the licensee analyses were " acceptable" under the current criteria. The licensee acknowledged the commerits.

(Paragraph 3)

.

.

ee

- 2 --

.

.

-

._ _.. _.

.

.

-

,...

.

.-

-

-

-

.

. _.

._

._.._.--

.

_

_

.

_ _ _ _ __ _ _. _. _ __. _ _. -

_

.

-

,

,

REPORT DETAILS

.

1.

Persons Contacted

-

%

m^;.

V

-

,

,

Mr. C. Larson7 Plant Superintendent

,

Mr. L. Eliason, Radiation-Chemistry Supervisor Mr. R. Jacobson, Plant Chemist 2.

General The licensee is required to measure the quantities and concentrations of radioactive material in effluents from his facility to assure that they are within the limits specified in his license and AEC Regulations.

This inspection consisted of a test of the licensee's measurements of radioactivity in actual samples of his ef fluents.

The test consists of comparing the licensee's measurements with those of the AEC's Reference Laboratory. The two laboratories make

.

measurements on the same samples, or on duplicates or splits of the same samples.

The measurements made by the AEC's Reference Laboratory are referenced to the National Bureau of Standards

.

radioactivity measurements system by laboratory intercomparisons.

.

.

3.

Analytical Results This inspection showed all of the licensee's measurements on these samples are acceptable under the test criteria used by the Directorate of Regulatory Operations for comparing measurements reg 3As. (see the, Attachment). The types. of. samples ' tested and

.

' * ^ " *

%g the results of measuremeii'ts were:

s A.

Type of Sample: Off Gas (3/74) (Results in units of uC1/ml)

,

, ACCEPTABLE Radionuclide AEC Reference Measurement Licensee Measurement-Xe-133'

4.9 0.3 E-01 5.0 E-01 NOT ACCEPTABLE: None.

.

%

d

'

-3-

,

s

'

.

..,emo e e-sa

=

..

.-

-

-.

..

.

-

.

-.

.

.

._.

.

-

--.

- -.

.-

~.

_ - _ -.

,

(

B.

Type of Sample Charcoal Adsorber (3/74) (7/74)

(Results in units of uCi/ sample)

,

ACCEPTABLE y

,

~

Radionuclide AEC Reference Measureaant Licensee Measurement

.

4.20{-0.05EO

{0.01 8.2 0.1 E-01 0.05 E-01 1-131 5.02 EO 1-131 3.41

-

g.

NOT ACCEPTABLE: None.

C.

Type of Sample: Particulate Filter (7/74)

(Results in units of uC1/ sample)

ACCEPTABLE

.

Radionuclide AEC Reference Measurement Licensee Fkasurement I 0.08 E-03 2.5 I 0.1 E-03 I-131 1.69 Ba-140 1.4 1 0.1 E-03 1.8 0.1 E-03 Cs-137

1 1 E-05 3.8 I 0.4 E-05

-

NOT ACCEPTABLE:

None.

4.

Particulate Filter Analysis Routine.gan;ma spectroscopic analyses of particulate filter samples

. * " ' ?y'

were 'not. performed by'the licensee'at the' time of this comparison.

'

Rather, the laboratory of the Department of Radiological and Occupational Health of the State of Minnesota performed these analyses under a gift agreement between the licensee and the State, Sine July 1,1974, these filters have been returned to the licensee

,

after *he State completes its analysis and the licensee has

.

performed a duplicate analysis.

A verification test of the licensee's own capability in performing this analysis is underway and will be examined in a subsequent inspection.

.

l l

!

!

l

.

!

Enclosure:

l Attachment 1

_

.

-4-

,

l

- - - - - -....

- - -.

!

I

'

- - -

-

-

._ _.

_

..

.

'

'

.

.

.

,A_TTACHMENT 1

.

CRITERIA FOR COMPARING ANALYTICAL MEASURDfENTS

...

e This attr'hment provides criteria for comparing results of capability tests and verification measurements. The criteria are 'oased on an

,

empirical relatsonship which combines prior experienc e and the a

REGION lli r,

p 8 ses *

799 ROOSEVELT RO AD ggureg OLEN ELLYN. ILLINO68 6ol37 (lit)458-3660

%

,

.

A.

R0 Inspection Report No.

050-263/74-07 Transmittal Date

_ October 22, 1974 Distribution:

Distribut.on i

R3 Chief. FS&EB R0 Chief. FS&EB RC:HQ (5)

RO HQ (4)

DR Cantral Files L D/D for Fuels & Materials

.

Regulatory StandHds (3)

DR Central Files

~

Licensing (13)

RO Files RO Files

-

s B.

RO Inquiry Report No.

j.

,

Transmittal Date

listributions O ptributions

a

.

w,hy.

..qpe.

W Chief. FS&EB

' Cthat, FS&EB "

  • "

"

. #.

"

' '

  • -.

-

,

RO:HQ (',)

RO HQ DR Central Files DR Central Files Ragulator,r Stc.ndards (3)

RO Files Licensing (13)

,,. -

,

RO F13cs C.

Incident Notification Fros

(Licensec & Docket No. (or Licenso lio.)

,

Transmittal Date

Distribution:

Distribution:

R0 Chief. FS&EB R0 Chief. FS&EB

/0:HQ (4)

,RO HQ (4)

Licensing (4)

LtD/D for Fuels & Materials

-

DR Central Filas DR Central Files RO Files RO Files

,

.

O O

_...

.

1..

_

l

.-

.

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_____ _ _ _ _