IR 05000254/1980015
| ML19331C113 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 07/03/1980 |
| From: | Danielson D, Ward K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19331C107 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-254-80-15, 50-265-80-18, NUDOCS 8008140178 | |
| Download: ML19331C113 (4) | |
Text
.
O
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Reports No. 50-254/80-15; 50-265/80-18 Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265 Licenses No. DPR-29; DPR-30 Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name: Quad-Cities Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Quad-Cities Site, Cordova, IL Inspection Conducted: June 24-25, 1980 Inspector:
D W
o u
w
.
Approved By:
D. H. Danielson, Chief
'
Engineering Support Section 2 Inspection Summary Inspection on June 24-25, 1980 (Reports No. 50-254/80-15; 50-265/80-18)
Areas Inspected: Torus support modification QA/QC program, implementing procedures, work activities, and review and evaluation of welding and non-destructive examination (NDE) data. This inspection involved a total of 11 onsite inspection-hours by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
i8.008140 qq
.
-
.
.
-.
-
..-.
---.
.
i
DETAILS Persons Contacted Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO)
- K. Graesscr, Assistant Superintendent QC
- T. Warner, QC Inspector
- D. Clark, Technician Staff
W. Dumke, QA Engineer The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employees.
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
General References:
a.
NRC Reports No. 50-254/80-03; 50-265/80-05 (Torus Modification)
b.
NRC Reports No. 50-254/79-29; 50-265/79-26 (Torus Modification)
c.
NRC Reports No. 50-254/79-19; 50-265/79-16 (Torus Modification)
2.
Procedure Review The inspector reviewed the following new procedures:
GESI, FCAW Procedure for Welding Carbon Steel, No. QC-FCI-IFN, a.
Revision 2, April 24, 1980.
b.
GESI, SMAW Procedure for Butterbead Temperbead Welding, No. QC-SMB-TN, Revision 4, March 14, 1980.
[
l GESI, SMAW Procedure for Welding Carbon Steel, No. QC-SMI-IN, c.
Revision 11, March 13, 1980.
i No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
i I-2-
.. _ - -
- _..
_
_ _ _ _
_
_ - _ _ _
_,.__ _. _.. _. _., ___
, - _. _
8 3.
Personnel Certifications The inspector reviewed the following Graver NDE personnel certifica-a.
tions in accordance with SNT-TC-IA, 1975 Edition.
Name VT PT MT RT T. Charette II II II N. Hammer II II II K. Crom II II II b.
The Graver welder certifications were reviewed in accordance with ASME Section IX, 1977 Edition, Summer 19 Addenda.
Name Stacp No.
Name Stamp No.
T. Ayotta 138 F. West 246 D. Hodges 143 L. Gardner 247 W. Van Dyke 200 T. Naughton 250 B. Visser 201 B. Nichols 251 D. Bradford 231 F. Ballinger 256 D. Castle 238 W. MacDonald 257 4.
Material Certification The inspector reviewed the following new material certifications:
a.
Electrodes: E7018, 1/8", HT #402T4721.
b.
Several saddle plate assemblies.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Observation of Work The inspector observed the following work activities:
a.
A Graver welder welding on the butter temper bead, Unit 2, Column 4.
b.
A fit up of a saddle Unit 2, Column 3.
c.
CECO QC inspector inspecting butter temper beads on columns 12, 13, and 14 and an area on column 11 where the wing plate had been ground loose on Unit 2.
CECO QC is required to inspect 20% of the completed butter temper bead welds but are performing a 100% inspection on all temper bead welds.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-3-
.
._
.
_
_
_
_
_
_._-
_ - _ -.
-.
__.
._
..
,
6.
Review of Data Reports The inspector reviewed the following data:
a.
CECO, visual reports of the butter temper bead welds by Graver.
b.
CECO, QA Surveillance Reports of Welding by Morrison.
c.
CECO, QA Surveillance Reports of Welding by Graver.
d.
Graver, Surveillance Reports of Graver.
e.
Graver, QA Audit of Graver.
No items of noncompliance of deviations were identified.
Exit Interview The inspector met with site representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted paragraph) at the conclusion of the inspection. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection noted in this report.
i i
l l
!
l
.
l l
i s-4-1~
--
.
-.
..
.
_ -. _.. -
-,.-,..,__-- -, - - _. _,.. _.. -, _ _, _