IR 05000244/2013301

Er 05000244-13-301; April 26, 2013 Through May 16, 2013; R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report

ML13158A271
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	06/07/2013
From:	Diane Jackson Operations Branch I
To:	Joseph Pacher Constellation Energy Nuclear Group
Shared Package
ML13060A101	List: IR 05000244/2013301 ML13079A047 ML13114A080 ML13149A412 ML13149A419 ML13184A120 ML13184A123 ML13184A126 ML13184A133 ML13184A163 ML13184A174 ML13184A181 ML13184A186
References
50-244/13-301
Download: ML13158A271 (9)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION une 7, 2013

SUBJECT:

R. E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING RETAKE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000244/2013301

Dear Mr. Pacher:

On May 16, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed retake examinations at R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on May 28, 2013, with Mr. Tom Paglia and other members of your staff.

The retake examinations included the evaluation of two applicants for reactor operator licenses and two applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses. Written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The license examiner determined that all four of the applicants passed their respective retake examinations. Appropriate licenses were issued on June 5, 2013.

No findings were identified during this examination.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-244 License No. DPR-18

Enclosure:

NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000244/2013301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION I==

Dockets: 50-244 Licenses: DPR-18 Report : 05000244/2013301 Licensee: Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC Facility: R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Location: 1503 Lake Road Ontario, NY 14519 Dates: May 15 - 16, 2013 (Operating Test Administration)

April 26, 2013 (Written Examination Administration)

May 3 to May 20, 2013 (NRC Examination Grading)

June 5, 2013 (Licenses Issued)

Examiner: D. Silk, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch Approved By: Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety i Enclosure

Summary of Findings ER 05000244/2013301; April 26, 2013 through May 16, 2013; R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report.

One NRC examiner evaluated the competency of two retake applicants for reactor operator licenses and two retake applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses at R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant. The facility licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021,

"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.

The written examination was administered by the facility on April 26, 2013. The NRC examiner administered the operating tests on May 15-16, 2013. The license examiner determined that all four of the applicants passed their respective examinations. The appropriate licenses were issued on June 5, 2013.

A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings No findings were identified.

B. Licensee-Identified Violations None.

ii Enclosure

REPORT DETAILS 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)

.1 License Applications a. Examination Scope The examiner reviewed the four license applications submitted by the licensee to ensure the applications reflected that each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement, and NRC Form 396, Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee. The reactor operator retake applicants requested waivers for the operating portion of the examination and the senior reactor operator retake applicants requested waivers for the written examination and the dynamic simulator portion of the operating test. These waivers were granted by Region I. In addition, because all of the applicants had exceeded 24 months since passing a generic fundamental examination (GFE), the licensee requested a waiver asking for a deferral of a GFE examination until after the completion of the NRC retake examinations. This waiver was granted by NRC headquarters.

b. Findings No findings were identified.

.2 Operator Knowledge and Performance a. Examination Scope On April 26, 2013, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to the two reactor operator retake applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on May 3, 2013.

The NRC examiner administered the job performance measure portion of the operating examination to the two senior reactor operator retake applicants on May 15-16, 2013.

These applicants participated in a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 10 system tasks and an administrative test consisting of five tasks.

b. Findings All four of the retake applicants passed their respective examinations. For the written examinations, the reactor operator applicants average score was 83.3 percent and ranged from 81.3 to 85.3 percent.

Enclosure

The NRC examiner completed the final grading of the written examination on May 3, 2013, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions. Chapter ES-403 and Form ES-403-1 of NUREG 1021 require the licensee to analyze the validity of any written examination questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants. The licensee determined that the 22 questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants were valid. (Note: This was a high number due to the fact that only two individuals took the written examination.) The licensee conducted a performance analysis for all 75 questions. Based on their review and analysis, the licensee did not submit any post-examination comments.

The text of the examination questions may be accessed in the Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) system under the accession numbers noted in Attachment 1. However, in accordance with current NRC policy, the release of this written examination in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for 2 years.

.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development a. Examination Scope The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Supplement 1. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The facility licensee submitted both the written and operating examination outlines on January 29, 2013. The chief examiner reviewed the outlines against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the draft written examination package on March 22, 2013, and the draft operating examination on April 8, 2013. The chief examiner reviewed the draft examination package against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution for the written and operating examination on April 24, 2013. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided minor editorial comments on May 13-14, 2013.

b. Findings The NRC approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with the operating examination development.

The examiner determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed operating examination.

.4 Simulation Facility Performance a. Examination Scope The examiner observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the examination validation and administration.

Enclosure

b. Findings No findings were identified.

.5 Examination Security a. Examination Scope The examiner reviewed examination security for examination development and during the examination administration week for compliance with NUREG-1021 requirements.

Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.

b. Findings During the administration of the written examination, one of the reactor operator applicants demonstrated signs of anxiety while taking the test. The proctor contacted the escort and informed him of the applicants condition. On a subsequent restroom break, a discussion occurred outside of the exam room and out of the presence of the proctor between the applicant and the escort in which the applicant was encouraged to relax and take one question at a time. There was some small talk (i.e., weather, NFL draft) that occurred. When this event was relayed to the chief examiner, it was stated that no discussion pertaining to the examination occurred. The escort was not part of the exam development team and, although not on the security agreement, he was aware of exam security considerations. Regional management requested the licensee to reconstruct the specifics of this event and details of the conversation between the applicant and the escort and then state why they believed that exam integrity was maintained. This information, and a Regional recommendation, was forwarded to NRC headquarters for their assessment. NRC headquarters decided that no examination security breech occurred. However, NRC headquarters instructed the Region to do the following: 1) Prior to the next Ginna initial operator licensing examination, reinforce the examination security expectations with the licensee, 2) ensure the examination security issue is documented in the examination report as required by ES-501 E.3.a, and 3) prior to the next initial examination verify that licensee corrective actions have been taken to prevent recurrence as specified in ES-201, Attachment 1, Physical Security Guidelines Item 5.

4OA6 Meetings, including Exit The chief examiner presented the examination results to Ms. A. Smith, Nuclear Training Manager and Mr. T. Paglia, Operations Manager of your staff on May 28, 2013. Your staff did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.

Attachments:

1. Supplemental Information 2. Simulator Fidelity Report Enclosure

A-1 ATTACHMENT SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KEY POINTS OF CONTACT Licensee Personnel A. Smith, Nuclear Training Manager K. Garnish, General Supervisor, Operations Training J. List, Supervisor Operations Continuing Training D. Dean, Operations Exam Reviewer (SRO)

P. Landers, Lead Exam Developer S. Reed, Nuclear Training Instructor NRC Personnel N. Perry, Senior Resident Inspector ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened NONE Opened and Closed NONE Closed NONE Discussed NONE ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED Accession No. ML -13149A412 FINAL-Written Exam (Note: In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of this written examination in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for 2 years.)

Accession No. ML - 13149A419 FINAL-Operating Exam (JPMs only)

Attachment