IR 05000213/1986019
| ML20215J442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1986 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Opeka J CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8610270012 | |
| Download: ML20215J442 (2) | |
Text
.
OCT 161986
.
Docket No. 50-213 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company ATTN: Mr. J. F. Opeka Senior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Operations Group P. O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Inspection No. 86-19 This refers to your letter dated September 3,1986, in response to our letter dated August 4, 1986.
Thank you for informing us of the corrective and preventive actions documented in your letter.
These actions will be examined during a future inspection of your licensed program.
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely, Original Signed By:
Bottenhausen tewart D. Ebneter, Director Division of Reactor Safety
cc:
R. Graves, Plant Superintendent D. O. Nordquist, Manager of Quality Assurance R. T. Laudenat, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensing l
E. J. Mroczka, Vice President, Nuclear Operations Gerald Garfield, Esquire Public Document Room (PDR)
local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
i NRC Resident Inspector I
State of Connecticut
,
d gol 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY RL HN 86-19 - 0001.0.0
/ I l
8610270012 861016 PDR ADOCK 05000213 G
_ _,. __ _. _..
.-. - - - -, _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -. _ -. -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ -.., - - -.
-
.
.
.
Connecticut Yankee Atomic
<
..
Power Co.
bec w/ encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o enc 1)
Section Chief, DRP M. McBride, RI, Pilgrim J. Shedlosky, SRI, Millstone 1&2 T. Rebelowski, SRI, Millstone 3 J. Akstulewicz, LPM, NRR Robert J. Bores, DRSS
,
t
6 N'
$26 RI:DRS RI:0RS RI:0RS PBi tt/c JJohnson LBettenhausen
6 10/g/86 104 6/86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY RL HN 86-19 - 0002.0.0 10/08/86
,
s l
s
,
.
i CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
,
,
B E R L I N, CONNECTICUT P O BOX 270 HARTFORD CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 TELEPHONE 203 4 65-5000 September 3, 1986 Docket No. 50-213 A05983 Mr. Stewart D.
Ebneter, Director Division of Reactor Safety United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Reference:
(1)
S.
D.
Ebneter letter to J.
F. Opeka, dated August 4, 1986, transmitting Inspection No.
50-213/86-19.
Gentlemen:
Haddam Neck Plant Response to I&E Inspection No. 50-213/86-19 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 (" Notice of Violation") and Appendix C (Enforcement Policy) of the NRC's Rules of Practice (10CFR2), this report is submitted in reply to Reference (1), which informed Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPCO) of a violation, identified during a routine inspection at the Haddam Neck Plant from July 7-11, 1986.
Alleged Violation:
10 CFR 50; Appendix B, Criterion V, Technical Specification (T.S.) 6.8 and the Northeast Utilities Quality Assurance Program require activities affecting quality to be prescribed and accomplished in accordance with documented procedures.
The following licensee procedures prescribe quality affecting activities:
Administrative Control Procedure 1.2 - 5.1, Trouble Reporting System and Automated Work Orders (AWOs), requires work activities to be controlled and documented, including (1) the implementation of a supplemental work order when the work scope increases and (2) the correct processing of Material Issue Lists (MILS).
Also, Administrative Control h, i l ], d 4 4 (
{
.
r
.
-2-
.
Procedure 1.2 - 2.5, Classifyino and Upgrading Spare Parts, requires MILS to be correctly classified and requires an appropriate revie! be performed to determine if a spare part is a Category 1 item.
Contrary to the above, as of July 11, 1986, AWO CY-86-03247 was not controlled and documented in accordance with ACP 1.2 - 5.1 in that, (1) a supplemental work order was not generated when the work scope changed from relugging one termination to relugging all terminations within CH-MOV-298, and (2) the associated MIL was not correctly classified as Category I for the spare parts (lugs) utilized to complete the work.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Response:
As an immediate corrective action, the failure to follow procedure was discussed with the job supervisor.
He acknowledged i
the errors.
As a planned corrective action, the requirement to follow procedures will be emphasized with all employees in department meetings planned for September / October.
Additionally, at these meetings, all employees will be reminded of the plant disciplin-ary action policy regarding failure to follow procedures.
The initial action of this progressive discipline sequence, consis-ting of a verbal warning, was administered in this case.
This corrective action is scheduled to be completed by November 30, 1986.
Very truly yours, CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
-
J.
R Dpeka U Senior Vice President L