E910-05-024, Final Status Survey Report for Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation Open Land Area OL13. Appendix a

Final Status Survey Report for Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation Open Land Area OL13. Appendix a

ML051950135
Person / Time
Site:	Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png
Issue date:	06/22/2005
From:	GPU Nuclear Corp
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
E910-05-024
Download: ML051950135 (45)

Text

Appendix A (pages 1-9)

SNEC CALCULATION COVER SHEET CALCULATION DESCRIPTION Calculation Number Revision Number Effective Date Page Number E900-05-017 I I of 9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - OL13 Question I - Is this calculation defined as 'in QA Scope'? Refer to definition 3.5. Yes 0 No El Question 2 - Is this calculation defined as a 'Design Calculation'? Refer to definitions 3.2 and 3.3. Yes 0 No Il NOTES: If a 'Yes answer Is obtained for Question 1 the calculation must meet the requirements of the SNEC Facility Decommissioning Quality Assurance Plan. If a 'Yes answer Is obtained for Question 2. the Calculation Originators immediate supervisor should not review the calculation as the Technical Reviewer.

DESCRIPTION OF REVISION' Revision 1 - Added the DCGLw Calculation Logic cover page to Attachment 2.

APPROVAL SIGNATURES Calculation Originator Tristan M. Tritchl -

I.

Technical Reviewer Additional Review

+

9'SNEC CAL;CUL'A"IONSHE Calculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 I Page 2 of 9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - OL13 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this calculation is to develop a final status survey design for open land area OL1 3 at the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation (SNEC) facility.

1.2 Survey Area OL13 is an Impacted Class 3 area which bounds the eastern perimeter of the SNEC facility decommissioning project. It covers approximately 27.600 square meters (269 10m x 10m grids and 15 partial grids) and is one of the largest survey areas on the project. Table 5-5 of the SNEC License Termination Plan (LTP) limits the physical size of Class 3 survey areas to 10,000 square meters. Due to this area constraint, OL13 will be subdivided into three smaller survey units,. namely' OL 3-1 through OL1 3-3, containing

.9800, 8800, and 9000 square meters, respectively. '

1.3 Previous soil samples have indicated that no detectable activity greater than the Administrative Limit (AL) exists in this entire survey area.

1.4 OL1 3-3 has some concrete supports located on the eastern portion of the survey unit spanning grids AT102 and AU103. There also exists an electrical tower in grid AV100.

AZ 11 has an air sampling station.

1.5 OL13-1 is bounded to the south by the Power Plant Road. The general layout of the three survey units is shown on Attachment 1-1.

2.0

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS Below is information that should be used to develop a Survey Request (SR) for each of the three survey units.

The US NRC has reviewed and concurred with the methodology used to derive the effective DCGLw value listed below. See also Attachments 2-1 through 2-3 from Reference 3.13.

Table 1, DCGLw Values I Volumetric DCGLw(pCUg-Cs.137) l l1 6.46 (4.84 A.L.) .- l NOTE: A.L Is the site Administrative Limit (75% of the effective DCGLw)

Of the 276 equivalent grids in OL13, 195 soil samples were taken from 82 of those grids. No sample exhibited activity greater than 30% of-the A.L .The on-site sampling data was used to generate a sigma value (standard deviation) for determining th'e number of static measurements and soil samples to be taken during FSS. In addition, three samp!es were sent off site for *SNEC 11" analyses. 0L4 data were used in this design because the activities of the three OL13 off-site sample analyses were so low as to produce unrealistic ratios of hard-to-detect radionuclides to Cs-137.

2.1 Survey Design 2.1.1 Scanning of open lands shall be performed using a 2" dia. by 2" long Na! detector with a Cs-1 37 window setting (Reference3.11). :The window will straddle the Cs-1 37 662 keV full energy peak width (see typical calibration information on Attachment 3-1).

2.1.2 The instrument conversion factor/efficiency shall not be less than that assumed on Attachment 4-1: :205.6 cpmvuR/h- Cs'-137.

i"' ~~SNCCALCULTO'SHEE C dB ls ;

Caliculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 1 Page 3 of 9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - 0L13 2.1.3 Other instruments, of the type specified in Section 2.1.1 above, may be used during the final status survey (FSS), but they must demonstrate detection efficiencies at or above the value listed in Section 2.1.2.

Table 2, Soil Scanning Parameters MDCscan (pCug) - Cs-137' Scan Speed (cmlsec) Maximum Distance from Surface Action Level %Coverage 5.67 25 4- (gap between detector face & soil surface) > 160 ncpm up to 10%

See Attachment 4-1" 2.1.4 If a count rate greater than the action level in Table 2 is encountered during the scanning process, then the surveyor shall stop and locate the boundary of the elevated area. The surveyor should then mark the elevated area with stakes or other appropriate marking methods. Sample the elevated areas(s) IAW SNEC procedure E900-IMP-4520.04 (Reference 3.2), Section 2.2 of this document, and the investigation design.

2.1.4.1 Class 3 soils should be scanned using a serpentine pattern that is -0.5 meters wide.

2.1.4.2 As this is a Class 3 survey area, up to 10% of all accessible surfaces are required to be scanned. See Attachment 11 for grid layouts for the three survey units. Attachment 6 shows 28 grids selected for scanning and provides the grid identification for'each.

2.1.4.3 Portions of survey units which cannot be accessed should be clearly noted along with the reason for not completing the survey.

2.1.5 The minimum number of soil sampling points indicated by the COMPASS computer program (Reference'3.3) is 11 for each of the three survey units (see COMPASS output on Attachments 7-1 to 7-7). Sampling depth should be lAW Section 2.2.

The MDCscan (soil) exceeds the effective administrative DCGLw C.137 (5.67 pCilg MDCscan @'250 cpm background > 4.84 pCilg'AL); however, given the area factor for the assumed one meter squared elevated 'area, the scan MDC meets MARSSIM requirements.

2.1.6 VSP (Reference 3.4) is used to plot all sampling -points on the included diagrams.

The actual number of random start systematically spaced measurement points may be greater than that required by the Compass computer code because of any or all of the following:

• placement of the initial random starting point (edge effects),

• odd shaped diagrams, and/or

• coverage concerns (see Attachments 6-1 through 6-6 for VSP sampling point locations)

1/2SNEC CALCL11NHET>: .

Calculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 I Page 4 of 9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - OL13 2.1.7 The starting points for physically locating sample sites in the survey unit are based on measurements from site grid pins (see diagram on Attachments 6-1, 6-3, and 6-5). Remaining soil sampling points are positioned using coordinates developed from these markers and listed on Attachments 6-2, 6-4, and 6-6.

2.1.8 Some sampling points may need to be adjusted to accommodate obstructions within the survey area. Contact the SR coordinator'to report any difficulties encountered.

when laying out systematic grid sampling points.

2.1.9 When an obstruction is encountered that will not allow collection of a sample, contactthe cognizant SR coordinatorfor permission to delete the sampling point.

NOTE If remediation actions are taken as a result of this survey, this survey design must be revised or re-written entirely.

2.2 Sample fixed point and elevated areas(s) IAW SNEC procedure E900-IMP-4520.04 (Reference 3.2) and the following.

NOTE Since the site surface dose model is 1 meter in depth, samples representative of the entire one meter thick dose model layer must be collected to satisfy the sampling requirements of Section 2.1.5 (of this document). This should be done by obtaining a well mixed sample of an entire one meter deep core. 'Sections 4.2.3, 4.2.6, or 4.2.7 of site procedure E900-IMP-4520.04 are applicable- when satisfying Section 2.1.5 of this document. Sampling due to an instrument alarm' condition should also be of the entire one meter of soil/material.

2.2.1 Clearly mark, identify and document all sample locations.

2.3.1 Sample any location that is above the action level cited in Table 2.

2.3.2 Maintain chain-of-custody requirements on all design fixed point and action level samples (Reference 3.12).

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 SNEC Calculation No. E900-03-018, "Optimizei Window and Threshold Settings for the Detection of Cs-1 37 Using the Ludlum'2350-1 and a 44/10 Nal Detector", 817103.

3.2 SNEC Procedure E900-IMP-4520.04, 'Survey Methodology to Support* SNEC License Termination'.

3.3 COMPASS Computer Program, Version 1.0.0, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.

3.4 Visual Sample Plan, Version 3.0, Copyright 2004, Battelle Memorial Institute.

3.5 SNEC Facility License Termination Plan.

3.6 SNEC Procedure E900-IMP-4500.59, 'Final Site Survey Planning and DQA'.

3.7 GPU Nuclear, SNEC Facility, 'Site Area Grid Mapr, SNECRM-020, Sheet 1, Rev 4, 1118105.

3.8 SNEC Calculation No. E900-03-012, Effective DCGL Worksheet Verification.

7 ". 5st~isS',sI LaWAo;--m--

-- a *,

SNEC s'gCALCULATIONSHEET 7' 7 .

Calculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 1 Page 5 of 9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - OL13 3.9 SNEC Procedure E900-IMP-4520.06, uSurvey Unit Inspection in Support of FSS Design'.

3.10 NUREG-1575, 'Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual", August, 2000.

3.11 Microsoft Office Excel, Version 11.0.5612, Microsoft Corporation Inc., 1985-2003.

3.12 SNEC Procedure E900-ADM-4500.39 'Chain of Custody for Samples" 3.13 Recent "SNEC 11" Results from OL4, E900-05-019.

3.14 Personal conversation between Tristan Tritch and with Rob Marquette, 3/24105.

4.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND BASIC DATA 4.1 The COMPASS computer program is used to calculate the required number of random start systematic samples to be taken in the survey unit'(Reference 3.3).

4.2 Characterization soil samples from this area are used as the initial estimate of variability.

These results are shown on Attachments 8-1 through 8-3.

4.3 The MARSSIM Sign Test will be applicable for, this survey design. No background subtraction will be performed under this criterion during the DQA phase.

4.4 The Visual Sample Plan (VSP) computer code (Reference 3.4) locates the required number of fixed survey points, determined by COMPASS, on the survey map for each survey unit.

4.5 References 3.5 and 3.6 were used as guidance during the survey design development phase.

4.6 Background has been measured in the area and is approximately 250 cpm (Reference 3.14). The number of sample points was increased by almost 30% to account for swampy areas and other conditions which may cause some sample locations to be inaccessible.

4.7 The determination of the physical extent of this area is based on the drawing Reference 3.7.

4.8 There has been no known remediation in Area OL1 3.

4.9 This survey design uses Cs-1 37 as a surrogate for all SNEC facility related radionuclides in the survey unit. The effective DCGLw is the Cs-137 DCGLw from the SNEC LTP (6.6 pCilg) adjusted (lowered) to compensate for the presence (or potential presence) of other SNEC-related radionuclides. In addition, an administrative limit (75%) has been set that further lowers the permissible Cs-137 concentration to an effective surrogate DCGLw for this survey area.

4.10 Samples, drawn from the sample database, typically would 'be used to determine the effective radionuclide mix for Area OL13; however, one sample from OL4 was used instead.

Data from OL4 was used because it is' immediately adjacent to OL13 and the sample has a sufficient amount of activity in it to produce meaningful ratios. The 'OL4 sample was assayed on site and at an off-site laboratory. Attachments 2-1 through 2-3 show the radionuclide analysis and the Effective DCGL Calculator.

I ~ SNEC~CALCULATION.SHEET'."~,."..

Calculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 I Page 6 of 9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - OL13 The undecayed sample results were input to the spreadsheet titled 'Effective DCGL Calculator for Cs-1 37" (Reference 3.8) to determine the effective volumetric DCGLw value for the three survey units. The output of this spreadsheet is shown on Attachment 2-2 which is copied from Reference 3.13. The spreadsheet was previously reviewed.

The Nal detector scan MDC calculation is determined based on a 25 cm/sec scan rate, a 1.38 index of sensitivity (95% correct detection probability and 60% false positive) and a detector sensitivity of 205.6 cpmluR/h for Cs-137; Additionally, the detection system incorporates a Cs-1 37 window that lowers sensitivity to background in the survey unit. The resulting background is approximately 250 cphm (Reference'14) for most locations in OL13.

4.11 The survey units described in this survey design were inspected. A copy of the 0L13 specific portion of the SNEC facility post-remediation 'inspection report (Reference'3.9) is included as Attachments 9-1 through 9-.

4.12 No special area characteristics including any additional residual radioactivity (not previously noted during characterization) have been identified in'this survey area.

4.13 The decision error for this survey design is 0.05 for the ai value and 0.1 for the P value.

4.14 'Special measurements', as described in the SNEC LTP sec 5.5.3.4, are not included in this survey design.

4.15 No additional sampling will be performed IAW this survey design beyond that described herein.

4.16 SNEC site radionuclides and their individual DCGLw values are listed on Exhibit I of this calculation.

4.17 The survey design checklist is listed in Exhibit 2.

4.18 Area factors are shown as part of COMPASS output (see Attachment 7-1) and are based on the Cs-1 37 area factors from the SNEC LTP.

4.19 Since this is a Class 3 open land area, the few existing concrete monoliths, spanning grids AT102 and AUI03, have not been selected for survey.

5.0 CALCULATIONS 5.1 All calculations are performed internal to applicable computer codes or within an Excel spreadsheet.

6.0 APPENDICES 6.1 Attachment 1-1 is a diagram of survey units OL13-1 through 0L13-3.

6.2 Attachments 2-1 through 2-3 show the DCGL Calculation Logic - OL4 (Reference 3.13).

6.3 Attachment 3-1 is a copy of the calibration data from typical Nal radiation detection instrumentation that will be used in this survey area.

6.4 Attachment 4-1 is the MDCscan calculation sheet for volumetric materials in pCilg.

6.5 Attachment 5-1 is the MicroShield dose rate calculation results for 6' thick soil used to determine the exposure rate from a 1 pCicm3 Cs-137 source term in an end-cylinder geometry.

"iSNEC CALCULATION SHEET Calculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 . 1 Page 7 of 9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - OL13 6.6 Attachments 6-1 through 6-6 show the randomly picked scan locations (from VSP) and reference coordinates for Survey Units OL1 3-1 through OL1 3-3.

6.7 Attachments 7-1 through 7-7 are COMPASS outputs for Survey Units OL13-1 through OL13-3 showing area factors, the number of sampling points in each survey unit, and prospective power.

6.8 Attachments 8-1 through 8-3 show the soil variability results for samples from OL13 based on all available data taken from the area.

6.9 Attachments 9-1 through 9-3 are copies of the inspection report for OL1 3.

SNEC CALCULATIONSHEET ---

Calculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 1 Page 8 of 9 Subjec Open Land FSS Design-OLI 3 Exhibit I SNEC Facility Individual Radionuclide DCGL Values (a) 25 mremly Limit 4 mremly Goal 25 mremly Limit (All Pathways) (Drinking Water)

Radionuclide Surface Area Open Land Areas Open Land Areas b (dpmr/1Ocm 2 ) (Surface & Subsurface) (Surface & Subsurface)

(pCilg) (pCUg)

Arn-241 2.7E+01 9.9 2.3 C-14 3.7E+06 2 5.4 Co-60 7.1 E+03 3.5 67 Cs-137 2.8E+04 .6.6 397 Eu-152 1.3E+04 10.1 1440 H-3 1.2E+08 132 31.1 Ni-63 1.8E+06 747 1.9E+04 Pu-238 . 3.OE+01 1.8 0.41 Pu-239 2.8E+01 1.6 0.37 Pu-241 8.8E+02 86 19.8 Sr-90 8.7E+03 1.2- 0.61 NOTES:

(a)While drinking water DCGLs will be used by SNEC to meet the drinking water 4 mremy goal, only the DCGL values that constitute the 25 mremty regulatory rmfnwill be controlled under this LTP and the NRC's approving license amendment (b) Usted values are from the subsurface model. These values are the most conservative values between the two models (i.e..

surface & subsurface).

I I4 . . .. '. . I

-SNEC CAiCULATION SHEET Calculation Number Revision Number Page Number E900-05-017 1 Page 9 of9 Subject Open Land FSS Design - OL13 Exhibit 2 SurveV Design Checklist Calcula No.efon Location Codes

_E90040"17, Rev. I OL13 ITEM REVIEW FOCUS (CbtueOne Initials&8 Date 1 Has a survey design calculation number been assigned and is a survey design summary10 Y _

description provided? Yes, 2 Are dravvings/diagramns adequate for the subject area (drawings should have compass Yes,(

3 Are boundaries properly identified and is the survey area classification clearly indicated? Yes,(

4 Has the survey area(s) been properly divided into survey units 1AW EXHIBIT 10 Yes, S Are physical characteristics of the area/location or system documented? Yes, _

6 Is a remediation effectiveness discussion included?Yes, 01 7 Have characterization survey and/or sampling results been converted to units that are es comparable to applicable DCGL values? Z 8 Is survey and/or sampling data that was used for determining survey unit variance included? Yes, WI 9 Is a description of the background reference areas (or materials) and their survey and/or Yes, N/K sampling results included along with a justification for their selection? _ ___

10 Are applicable survey and/or sampling data that was used to determine variability included? Yes, /

Will the condition of the survey area have an impact on the survey design, and has the Yes probable impact been considered in the design? es, Has any special area characteristic including any additional residual radioactivity (not 12 previously noted during characterization) been identified along with its impact on survey Yes, t design?

13 Are all necessary supporting calculations andlor sie procedures referenced or induded? , N/A zT ,/>

14 Has an effective DCGLw been identified for the survey unit(s)? N/A_ s-. //r 15 Was the appropriate DCGLoc included in the survey design calculation? Yes,(

16 Has the statistical tests that will be used to evaluate the data been identified? Yes, I 17 Has an elevated measurement comparison been performed (Class 1 Area)? Yes, a 18 Has the decision error levels been identified and are the necessary justifications provided? Yes, I 19 Has scan Instrumentation been identified along with the assigned scanning methodology? Yes, _

20 Has the scan rate been Identified, and is the MDCscan adequate for the survey design? Yes, 21 Are special measurements e.g., In-situ gamma-ray spectroscopy required under this design, Yes, and Is the survey methodology, and evaluation methods described? Yes 22 Is survey Instrumentation calibration data included and are detection sensitiies adequate? Yes,_ _

23 Have the assigned sample and/or measurement locations been clearly identified on a diagram Yes or CAD drawing of the survey area(s) along with their coordinates?

24 Are investigation levls and administrative limits adequate, and are any associated actions A/A clearly indicated? De, N/A 1 25 For sample analysis, have the required MDA values been determined.? Yes, 26 Has any special sampling methodology been identified other than provided In Reference 6.3? Yes, NOTE: a copy of this completed form or equivalent, shall be included within the survey design calculation.

Appendix A (attachments 1-1 to 5-1) i OL4 I

F i M42 0

+83 l

bnL_

tI;'4~c A

.~~~ 0, 5 . = ('- 1.f CLI 3,-

, i _,

• -% . .' . .?. .~ a .. , -

.a . \ o; O* . . C e oOL OL3 o.i. --... r 0  :, .; I...;a

%50 i:.

. 1'

+#61 0

,_ . ;n '* . ,. ,.. . I .

• 1  ;, .*..

o .- o. oo o oo . a Wig2.*~ ~.5..

• ,.-. 3 .

I IV1

-EO O -, -l-i ° S ° . Ia. * '. :..' .:, aq ..

' - 0 --. I .:. 0-"7 l'..2 ':.:L13 -

o o 0 o0 I * -E,.'

0 0. Q 0--; 0~ p L i':;;

0 0" *0 *0

, ., o5 .Y%~t5 o

i 0 0

, , .a , ,.',

i 0 .. i S"oU" RUM ArrAa*MFYrr /-( -,.N ,7.

i Location Sample# H-3 r S-go Co-60 Cs4137 AM-241 Pai-238 Pu.239 Pu-241 C-14 Nf-63 Ett-162 Analysis Dato IGRIDBF-1181 4873 10<606 0341 2.15 213 <0.0423 0.0423 0.06951 <1.62 <0.184 <27.41-0.657IApril28,82004I CD 0

CD rri-C(

0

2 0

I-AAttMEN-r Z- e 1 ." .- . , " : ... .. , , - ---. -. -

75% TotalwAt.v*tyLmimt Administrative Limit

• SNEC ALVth 't.

6.53 pCIg 4.90 pCt1g Effective DCGL Calculator for Cs-137 (In pCilp) ___ _

I lll SAMPLE NUMBER(s)n 04 Grid mli._

3298.22% 25.0 mremly TEDE Limit I 6.46 pCIg 4.84 pCIlg 91.48%  ;;4. mremly Drinking Water (DW) Limit A.-Allowed pCiIg B -Allowed Value Checked from This ThIs Sample Isotope sample %of Total 25 mremty 4 mremly DW Sample mremly DW

° TEDE Umits Limits (pCDWg) for 25 mrem TEDE f 4 Column A or B Input (pCig, mramly uCl,tc (PCitg) mramy D ED E

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ meml DWT 2.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Am-241 0.000% 9.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-14 _0.000% 2.0 5.4 0.00 0.07 2.35 0.07 15.36 0.13:t Co.60 2.150 0.999% 3.5 67.0

.6.46 232.84 6.46 806.82 2.15 J Cs-137 213.00. 98.934% 6.6 397 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00- 0.00 Eu-152 0.000% 10.1. 1440 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 H-3 0.000% 132 31.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 747 19000 0.00 NI-63 0.58 0.41 1.8 0.41. 0.00 0.05 0.00 Pti-238 0.042 0.020% .

0.00 0.08 0.00 1.09 0.75-Pu-239 0.070 0.032% . 1.6 0.37.

0.00 0.00 l 0.00 0.00 0.000% 86 19.8 0.00 Pu-241 0.71 0.22 1.2 0.61 - 0.00 0.04 0.00 I Sr-90 0.034 0.016%

I 235.35 6.53 824.555 3.659--

i . -L. .- 100.000% _ 6.53

- 2.15E+02 _-

Maximum Maximum Permissible pClIg (4 To Use This Information, Permissible pCilg mramly) Sample Input Units Must Be (25 mromly) In pCIIg

.I ATTWM E7r Eb Z DCGLw Calculation Logic I, Survey Unit: First Energy - Penelec Site NE Open Land Area OL4, Class 1 Area ii.

Description:

The purpose of this calculation is to determine a representative mix from available sample analyses results for the Penelec NE Site area.

The effective volumetric DCGLw is then determined in accordance with guidance provided by the SNEC License Termination Plan (LTP) and MARSSIM.

Ill. Data Selection Logic Tables: The radionuclide selection logic and subsequent DCGLw calculations are provided in the tables described below.

These tables were developed using MicrosoftlExcel and are validated in SNEC calculation E900-03-012. Table explanations follow:

Attachment 2-1: Data Listing -This table provides a list of the most representative sample analyses from the OL4 area. Only one sample result met the combined requirements of being from the survey area, having analyses for the hard-to-detect nuclides, and with sufficient Cs137 activity to provide valid mix ratios. Results are from scoping and characterization surveys. The sample consisted of soil media that was taken in support of the aforementioned surveys. A sample number, radionuclide concentrations, and analysis date are provided for the sample.

Note I V%0h respect to the survey unit, the term 'soil'i i~s a generic term that can

-be used to describe individually or in combin'ation traditional soils,,fly ash, building rubble, and/or rock materials.

Attachment 2-2: Effective DCGLw Calculator for Cs-1 37 (in pCi/g) - This table provides the surrogate' Cs-I 37 DCGLw calculation results for data derived from Attachment 2-1. It uses the ratios between the nuclides weighted for the DCGLs to determine an effective surrogate'Csl 37 DCGL.

IV. Summary - Since the survey area is soil, coal debris, and rock materials, the existing release limit is based on the volumetric DCGLw. Using the above logic tables the calculated Cs-1 37 volumetric DCGLw is 6.46 pCi/g. This value would be reduced by 25% as part of the SNEC 'facilities requirement to apply an administrative limit of 4.84 pCig as discussed in the License Termination Plan (LTP).

A7T44AT z-&C

2350 INSTUMENT AND PROBE EFFICIENCY CHART 7/01/04 (Typical 2" by 2Ni lal (Cs-137 W) Conversion PaiAors)

Inst.#l Cal Due I AP:; l_ Probet I Cal Due cpm/mR/h 986>2

_ _04_ I 1 I8647 l R& Y i

I G &

_ _ I _

_ 21i168 6/1880S 211667 Pk Pk; 5T1S'Xfi

, I14. 8-21'_ _

P&IY. i_______.i211687 Pk 5/18/05 213.530 11 7-5 3 I 8,I/0)5 ()&Y I_ 1 2l1674Pk 511 8/0 .212.27S I 17566 4/9/053 G&R I118558 52 Pk 4/13/05 209-902

__ _ _ I _ I__ _ _ I _ _ _ _ I _ 1__ 1 12618'3 I I /19/04 B&&R l_l_206280( Pk j12/12/04 1 190,907

_ _ I _ _',_ i_I _ _ I K j.--

129t4 2 I I 1/3104 Y&W j 20628 104 177185 I'_____ I I 1.

j____ 1______.

12 6198 I I./03014 I& __ 1 IP I96,IPk 5/25/05 2 209. 194 126172 6/0f7/05D II l :&W l____ 1960)22 JI 6/07/05 I l

20)8.302 I IO 129440} 12944I_____1__ 1 4/09/05D O&WN;210938 IJ?19Sl Pk 1.4/14/05 I________ j ~ n°;

20-5.60.3. .

1-_ _ 1-_ _ I __--- '- I"' I _ _ _ _ c__

120588 6/08/(0 B&W ll185844 Pk 6109/05 j 216.654

_ _ _ _ _ I !_ i_ .__ __ _ _ _

3( I 6.25;05 P&,W ,j 0258 .6/)810' - 21 .790 2350 INSTRUMENT AND PROBE EFFBCIENCY CHART 7/01/04 (Typical 43-68 seta Efficiency Factors) l Dirtecni nstrumen<ttlProbcCal Dllc cln:lsn-llvlvlm e'@ . f INST 43-68 PROBE 44-10 PROBE B ALH INST # CD PROBE C/D PROBE C/I)

EFF EFF 79037 04/05/05 122014 04/23/05 _ _ L s . N/A 126188 1/27/05 0991_6_ 127/05 . 28.20% N/A 126218 01/08/05 1 095080 01/09/05 1 27.9' N/A_.

---90/o7.Acf r s-I*

Nal Scan MDC Calculation MDCscan 5.6740 pCi/g for Open Land Area OL13 b = background (cpm) bi = background counts in the observation interval (counts)

Conv = Nal detector/meter calibrated response (cpm per uRihr) d = index of sensitivity from MARSSIM table 6.5 based on 95% detection and 60% false positive HSd = elevated measurement spot diameter (centimeters)

MDCscan - Minimum Detectable Concentration for scanning (pCi/g)

MDCRi = Minimum Detectable Count Rate in (ncpm)

MDCRsurv = MDCRi adjusted for the human performance factor p (ncpm)

MDER = Minimum Detectable Exposure Rate (uRlhr)

MSoutput = MicroShield derived exposure rate for I pCilg of contaminant (mR/hr)

Oi = Observation interval (seconds) p = human performance adjustment factor (unitless)

SR = Scanning movement rate (cmlsec)

DCDLeq = net count rate equivalent to the adjusted DCGL (ncpm) b= 250 cpm p=l 0.5 HSd = -c56 Icm SR= 1 25 cm d= 1.38 Conv = 1 205.6 cpm/uR/hr MSoutput = 11.369E-04 mR/hr per pCVg DCGL = l4.84 pClg HSd = 2.2400 = Oi (sec)

SR b*Oi = 9.3333 = bi (counts) 60 secImin d'sqrt(bi)*60 = 112.9278 = MDCRi (ncpm)

Oi MDCRi = 159.7040 = MDCRsurv (ncpm) sqrt(p)

MDCRsurv - 0.7768 = MDER (uR/hr)

Conv MDER 5.6740 = MDCscan (pCVg)

MSoutput*1000 uR/mR MDCsurv*DCGL = 136.2297 = DCGLeq (ncpm)

MDCscan A7TAcf(oiX r 4-t

I-!--' ' MicroShiald v5.0S (5.05-001 21)

GPU Nuclear I Page :1 Fe Re!:

Fie Ret.

DOS FHe :ODELMS5 Date:

Run Dale : Seplembe 232003 Brk Run lm  : 243:26P t Checked -

Duwation : 00.00.02 Casa

Title:

Cs-l 37 Sail

Description:

Model for Scanning Geomatry-. 8 - Cylinder Volume - End Shields Source Dimensions Height 15.24 cm

• 6.i Radus 28.0cm 11.0 in

'Dnos Points

_A I X Y l Z

. 111 Ocm 25.4 cm 0 cm

. Li O.Oh ln inh 0.Oin I 1 3 Shields ShieldName I Dimention Material m I Densty Sowce 3.75e*04 cO Conclete 1.6 Ai Gap Ai 0.00122 Source Input Grouping Methlin: Actual Photon Energies HNtcEde l curies I . bec uerels l Ci/cmk l 1cietq 8a-137m 5.6815eO08 2.1022eO003 1.5136eO006 5.6003e-002 CsOW37 G005&.008 22221ei003. 1.600te006 . 5.9200eO(2 Buildup The material reference Is: Source

_nte'rration Parameters Radial 501 Gcunfacndal 50 Y Diedion laxiaAl 501

. -. f I Results Enei Adm MFluence Rate Fluenco Rate Exposune Rate Exposue Rate Me Phcn/y .- t Ieg Ie MeV/cdr/sec to Buldup MeV/cm'/sec Wih Buidup NomR/ht Buldup WihmR/lu Buildup 0.0318 4.352e401 7.6170-06 9.220046 6.345e-08 7.680e.08 0.0322 .030e+O01 1.465e05 1.7B4e-05 1.179e07 1.436e-07 0.0364 2922e+01 8.1le-06 1.060e-05 4.613e-08 6.024e-08 0.6616 1.892e.03 7.OGOe-nf2 1.260c-01 1.369c04 Z443e-04 TOTALS: Z045e403 7.063e-02 1.2S1e-01 1.371e 04 2446e-04

_74/ 6N7 5-/

Appendix A (attachments 6-1 to 6-6)

In A-Survey Unit OL13-1 AMIII AM97 A...

1: . i. .

,. 1_,,,

I . . .....

I. . ,. :....

AE111 ATrAe4(NOYr 4S-I

Soil Sample Locations and Scan Survey Grids for Survey Unit OLI3-1 VSP provides survey points using a scale relative to the southwestem comer of the survey unit. This is cumbersome as field personnel must measure over large distances (sometimes hundreds of meters) from the single reference point To remedy this situation, this spreadsheet provides the VSP survey points based on the actual location within each grid.

To identify soil sample locations, start at the grid identifier below left. Go east the number of meters under the "E column and then move north the number of meters in the "N" column. For simplicity, all measurements have been rounded to the nearest tenth of a meter.

To complete scan surveys, use the 10 scan locations below right These grids should be scanned 100%.

x Y Grid E N coordinate coordinate Scan Grid Location ID (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters) Location ID I AF111 2.5 7.3 2.5303 17.2511 1 AF110 2 AFIO8 1 7.3 30.9607 17.2511 2 AG104 3 AF106 9.4 7.3 59.3912 17.2511 3 AG100 4 AF103 7.8 7.3 87.8216 17.2511 4 AH108 5 A1110 6.7 1.9 16.7455 41.8726 5 A1106 6 A1107 5.2 1.9 45.176 41.8726 6 A1102 7 A1104 3.6 1.9 73.6064 41.8726 7 AJ98 8 AlIOI 2 1.9 102.0369 41.8726 8 AK111 9 A198 0.5 1.9 130.4673 41.8726 9 AK101 10 AK1 2.5 6.5 2.5303 66.4941 10 ALI07 11 AK108 1 6.5 30.9607 66.4941 12 AK106 9.4 6.5 59.3912 66.4941 13 AK103 7.8 6.5 87.8216 66.4941 14 AK100 6.3 6.5 116.2521 66.4941.

A. 4.

r.. - - .- . - . . .. . .

Survey Unit OL13-2 AT99 1 '

AMIII AM99 AmTAe4"Err (',-3

Soil Sample Locations and Scan Survey Grids for Survey Unit OL13-2 VSP provides survey points using a scale relative to the southwestern comer of the survey unit. This is cumbersome as field personnel must measure over large distances (sometimes hundreds of meters) from the single reference point To remedy this situation, this spreadsheet provides the VSP survey points based on the actual location within each grid.

To identify soil sample locations, start at the grid identifier below left. Go east the number of meters under the "E" column and then move north the number of meters in the "N" column. For simplicity, all measurements have been rounded to the nearest tenth of a meter.

To complete scan surveys, use the 9 scan locations below right. These grids should be scanned 100%.

x y Grid E N coordinate, coordinate Scan Grid Location ID' (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters) Location ID 1 AM109 4.7 8.6 34.7012 8.5565 1 AM106 2 AM106 1.6 8.6 61.6421 8.5565 2 AM101 3 AM104 8.6 8.6 88.583 8.5565 3 AN110 4 AM101 5.5 8.6 115.5239 8.5565 4 A0103 5 AP11O 1.2 1.9 21.2308 31.888 5 AP107 6 AP108 8.2 1.9 48.1717 31.888 6 AQ111 7 AP105 5.1 1.9 75.1126 31.888 7 AQ100 8 AP102 2.1 1.9 102.0535 31.888 8 AR106 9 AP100 9 1.9 128.9944 31.888. 9 AS103 10 AR112 7.8 5.2 7.7603 55.2195 11 AR109 4.7 5.2 34.7012 55.2195 12 AR106 1.6 5.2 61.6421 55.2195 13 AR104 8.6 5.2 88.583 55.2195:

14 AR101 5.5 5.2 115.5239 55.2195

- -ok- ;TA :tfMd c64

BD115 of:l- - BDIO9

• 11 1I Survey Unit OL13-3 K .

IE

.. 1. ., ,

1.-..

AX99

-PI J. ,l: -.. -

1:

FIIT-9 I I s ,

I^r I AW114 -

I

• L3rDS

.JAd +

_ l

+ 1

. - I --l-I -

AT112 AT99 A7TAKENT' --s

Soil Sample Locations and Scan Survey Grids for Survey Unit 0L13-3 VSP provides survey points using a scale relative to the southwestern comer of the survey unit. This is cumbersome as field personnel must measure over large distances (sometimes hundreds of meters) from the single reference point To remedy this situabon,'this spreadsheet provides the VSP survey points based on the actual location within each grid.

To identify soil sample locations, start at the grid identifier below left Go east the number of meters under the "E column and then move north the number of meters in the "No column. For simplicity, all measurements have been rounded to the nearest tenth of a meter.

To complete scan surveys, use the 9 scan locations below right. These grids should be scanned 100%.

x y Grid E N coordinate coordinate Scan Grid Location ID (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters) Location ID 1 AU112 9.5 3.6 39.543 13.589 1 AT1O9 2 AU109 6.8 3.6 66.7883 13.589 2 AU101 3 AU106 4 3.6 94.0336 13.589 3 AV106 4 AU103. 1.3 3.6 121.2789 13.589 4 AW110 5 AU101 8.5 3.6 148.5243 13.589 5 AW102 6 AW113 5.9 7.2 25.9203 37.1841 6 AX 14 7 AW110 3.2 7.2 53.1656 37.1841 7 AZ112 8 AW107 0.4 7.2 80.411 37.1841 8 BA15 9 AW105 7.7 7.2 107.6563 37.1841 9 BB110 10 AW102 4.9 7.2 134.9016 37.1841 11 AZ1I4 2.3 0.8 12.2977 60.7793 12 AZ112 9.5 0.8 39.543 60.7793 13 BB113 5.9 4.4 25.9203 84.3744 14 BB110 3.2 4.4 53.1656 84.3744

t: ' (o

Appendix A (attachments 7-1 to 9-3)

Site Report Site Summary Site Name: OL13 Planner(s): Tristan M. Tritch Contaminant Summary NOTE: Surface soil DCGLw units are pCIg. 2 Building surface bCGLw units are dprnIlOO cm .

Screening Contaminant Type DCGLw Value Used? Area (ml) Area Factor Cs-137 Surface Soil 4.84 No 1 28.7

- 25 4.7 100 3.6 400 3 2,500 2.3 10.000 1 COMPASS v1.0.0 3128/2005 Page 1

Surface Soil Survey Plan Survey Plan Summary I Site: OLI 3 Planner(s): Tristan M. Tritch Survey Unit Name: OLI 3-;

Comments: Southernmost survey unit in OL13 Area (m2 ): 9,800 Classification: 3 Selected Test Sign Estimated Sigma (pCi/g): 0.3999 DCGL (pCi/g): 4.84 Sample Size (N): 11 LBGR (pCig): 3.7 Estimated Conc. (pCi/g): 0.5 Alpha: 0.050 Estimated Power: 1 Beta: 0.100 Prospective Power Curve

1. _ 1 '-I- - - -

'-1------ ______ - -

0.8 -I-t

-, 0.7 P -*1- ___ -- ___

-I.- -- ___

r 0.4

-C -I.- ___ -- ___

EC03 C' 02 -I- ___ --

G-5C 0.1 . -- _

.6 o 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Soil Concenfftionx Cifg), idudig 1g kgrowid

- Power - DCGL - - Esthated Power

- LBGR a 1-beta n n Page I cnMPacr; w1 r^> v8.%.%P Vv 31301200S

.:~ ~ ~~' -

.C.H;,,'-

'Ta Ar Z

Surface Soil Survey Plan Contaminant Summary DCGLw Inferred Modified DCGLw Scan MDC.

Contaminant (pCUg) Contaminant Ratio (pCIg) (pCI/g)

Cs-i 37 4.84 NIA NIA N/A N/A Survey Unit Estimate Reference Area Estimate (Mean +/- 1 -Sigma) (Mean +/- 1-Sigma)

Contaminant (pCUg) (pCUg)

Cs-137 0.4975 +/- 0.3999 0.28 +/- 0.39 efn" re- .. .

>%wmr,#%QQ V J.U.U vrlnlennz MXhWU5 Pag,e2

Surface Soil Survey Plan Survey Plan Summary Site: OL13 Planner(s): Tristan M. Tritch Survey Unit Name: OLi3-Comments: Middle surveyunit of 0L13 Area (m2 ): 8,800 Classification: 3 Selected Test Sign Estimated Sigma (pCi/g): 0.4365 DCGL (pCilg): 4.84 Sample Size (N): 11 LBGR (pCilg): 3.6 Estimated Conc. (pCi/g): 0.2 Alpha: 0.050 Estimated Power. 1 Beta: 0.100 Prospective Power Curve

~19 .71 _____

_ on --

c 0. -I - - ________

= 0.8 I____ _____ _____ -- _____

- 0.7 -l

-I ________ ________

-I-. - -

• OA -I - -

.C 0.3 1- _--

F,' 0.2 W-ic0.1 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 Soil Concentratin (PCig), iiudimg btckground

- 1Power DCGL - - Estrated Power

- LBGR

• 1beta

'.,..,r,%.J.,

I1:[]MP]LSS nn

. IAP.U

-vurwv1

.I.U.U 313012005 Page 1

Surface Soil Survey Plan Contaminant Summary DCGLw Inferred Modified DCGLw Scan MDC Contaminant (pCig) Contaminant Ratio (pCUg) W(PM1 Cs-137 4.84 N/A N/A N/A NIA Survey Unit Estimate Reference Area Estimate (Mean t 1-Sigma) (Mean

• 1-Sigma)

Contaminant (pC11g) (pCi/g)

Cs-1 37 0.2489 t 0.4365 0.28

• 0.39 rfa u.ee .

%%r#QQV I.U.U 3/30/2005 Page 2

• A7AH,AJr. -

...1--.1.- -_.

Surface Soil Survey Plan Survey Plan Summary Site: OL1 3 Planner(s): Tristan M. Tritch Survey Unit Name: OL1 3-3 Comments: Northernmost survey unit in OL1 3 Area (m2 ): 9.000 Classification: 3

.Selected Test: Sign Estimated Sigma (pCLg): 0.3063 DCGL (pCilg): 4.84 Sample Size (N): 11 LBGR (pCilg): 4 Estimated Conc. (pCilg): 0.3 Alpha: 0.050 Estimated Power. I Beta: 0.100 Prospective Power Curve

_ 1 c 0.9 09 -I- _________ ________

=£ OJ -I-

-,: 0.7 0.8 -I-

-I.- ______ ______ ______

~r. * -I- ______ ______ ______ ______

• OA 1

• -I---- ______ ______ ______

t 0.3

?; 0.2 I 0.1 p..

O. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Soil Coueextxtiox( pCig), wir aing lackgrouna

- Power - DCGL . - Estimated Power

- LBGR M l-beta COMPASS v1.0.0 3130/2005 Page 1

-'MAr V7-

Surface Soil Survey Plan Contaminant Summary DCGLw Inferred Modified DCGLw Scan MDC Contaminant (pCUg) Contaminant Ratio (pCi/g) (pCUg)

Cs-137 4.84 N/A NIA N/A NIA Survey Unit Estimate Reference Area Estimate (Mean Sigma) (Mean t 1-Sigma)

Contaminant (pCUg) (pCI/g)

Cs-137 0.3313 t 0.3063 0.28 +/-0.39 V-UMt'AbI VI.0.U ' 3130/2005 Page 2

--.... A7*fftAW  ?{7 o-7 I.

OL13-1 OL13-2 Cs:137 Cs-137.

SR GRID pCVg SR GRID pCvg 63 AF104 1.1 63 AM100 0.27 AG99 0.07 AM110 0.1 AG101 0.92 A0111 0.06 AG102 1.1 AP102 0.09 AG107 0.08 AR103 . 0.06 AG110 0.07 AR110 0.06 A197 0.43 145 AS100-1 1.4 A199 0.27 AS100-L2 0.1 AJ98 0.7 AS100-L2 0.1 AJ111 0.08 AK97 0.45 AK99 0.7 TOTAL 5.9700 TOTAL 2.2400 MAX 1.10 MAX 1.40 MIN - 0.07 MIN 0.06 '

MEDIAN 0.4400 MEDIAN 0.1000 AVG 0.4975 AVG 0.2489 STD DEV 0.3999 STD DEV 0.4365

<MDA <MDA ATTWKT B-I

OL13-3 OL13-3 CONTINUED Cs-137 Cs-137 SR GRID pCi/g SR GRID pCUq 72 AX1i1-1 0.06 145 AU107-1 0.3 AX111-2 0.4 AU107-2 0.12 AX11 -3 0.06 AU108-1 0.15 BA110-1 1.1 AU108-2 0.2 BAI10-2 0.37 AU109-1 0.15 BA110-3 0.06 AU109-2 0.13 BC111-1 0.66 AU110-1 0.13 BC1I-2 0.09 AUI10-2 0.1 BC111-3 0.06 AU111-1 0.13 111 AXI12-1 0.1 AU111-2 0.13 AXI12-2 0.08 AU112-1 0.6 AXI12-3 0.1 AU112-2 0.1 AX112-4 0.08 AU112-L2 0.3 AXI14-1 .0.8 AU112-L3 0.08 AXI14-2 0.05 AU112-L4 0.1 AXI14-3 0.1 AU112-L4 0.08 AZ113-1 0.4 AV101-1 0.8 AZ113-2 0.08 AV101-2 0.8 AZI13-3 0.1 AV102-1 0.15 AZI15-1 0.08 AVI02-2 0.7 AZI1i5-2 0.06 AV103-1 0.1 AZ115-3 0.1 AVI03-2 0.1 BB112 0.7 AV104-1 0.3 BBI12-2 0.16 AVI04-2 0.1 BBI12-3 0.1 AV105-1 1.1 BB114-1 0.2 AV105-2 0.75 BB114-2 0.1 AV106-1 0.5 BB114-3 0.08 AV106-2 0.4 BB114-4 0.09 AV107-1 0.43 145 AT101-1 0.4 AVI07-2 0.16 AT101-2 0.2 AV108-1 0.13 AT101-3 0.5 AV108-2 0.4 AT101-4 0.36 AV109-1 0.13 AT101-5 1 AVI09-2 0.14 AT101-6 0.2 'AV110-1 0.09 AT101-Ll 0.16 AV110-2 0.09 AT101-L1' 0.15 AV111-1 0.13 AT101-L2 0.1 AV111-2 0.12 AT101-12 0.1 AVi12-1 0.1 AT102-1 0.3 AVI 12-2 0.28

.ATA102-2, 0.14 149 AW101-1 0.8

,ATI1 02-3 0.13 AW101-2 0.54

-AT10249 0.15 152 BC115-1 0.64 0.17 OAT,2-51 BC115-2 ' 0.14 AT103-1 0.14 162 - AW1i2-1: 0.13 AT103-2 0.2 AW1i2-2 0.14 AT103-3 0.45 AY1I1-1 0.28 AT103-Li 0.5 AY111-2 0.4 AT,103t2 0.1 AY112-1 0.17 wrT* MWIT .- Z

Af!03-L3 0.1 'AYi1-22; 0.16 AT104-1 0.97 AY112-L2 0.46 AT104-2 0.07 AY112-L3 0.17 ATI04-3 0.15 AYI12-L4 0.14 AT105-1 0.14 AZ111-1 0.82 AT105-2 0.23 AZ111-2 0.7 AT105-LI 0.9 AZ112-1 0.19 AT105-L2 0.1 AZ112-2 0.62 AT105-L3 0.14 BA111-1 0.8 AT105-L4 0.06 BA 111-2 0.82 AT105-L5 0.1 BA112-1 0.6 AT105-L6 0.09 BA112-2 0.64 ATI05-L6 0.1 BB111-1 0.35 AT106-1 0.8 BB111-2 0.74 AT106-2 0.8 BC110-1 0.42 AT107-1 1 BC10-2 0.85 AT107-2 1 172 AY110-1 1.2 AT107-3 0.6 AY110-2 0.89 AT107-12 0.18 AZ110-1 1.1 AT107-L2 0.13 AZ11O-2 0.23 AT107-L3 0.09 AZ115-1 0.7 AT107-L4. 0.1 AZ115-2 0.6 AT107-L4 0.1 BA110-1 0.83 AT108-1 0.6 BA10-2 1.1 ATI 08-2 0.4 BAl 15-1 0.4 AT109-1 0.16 BA115-2 0.4 AT109-2 0.09 BB110-1 1.2 AT1I0-1 0.1 BBI10-2 1.1 AT110-2 0.2 BB115-1 0.42 ATI11 -1 0.14 BB115-2 0.35 ATI11-2 0.1 ATI12-1 0.12 AT112-2 0.16 AU101-1 0.14 AU101-2 0.22 AU102-1 0.14 AU102-2 0.17 AU103-1 0.8 AU103-2 0.1 AU104-1 0.13 AU104-2 0.2 AU105-1 0.14

.AU105-2. 0.13 AUi16-1. 0.07

-AU1062 0.15 TOTAL 57.3200 MAX 1.2000

.MDA

... I _..

. I - MIN 0.0500 MEDIAN 0.1600 AVG 0.3313 STD DEV 0.3063

~.-~., at+AfMflE$1_5

7-* - " .: ,'.

'Exhibit I SurvepUnhinspecdonchechkShee_ :: -1; Pt Survey Unit Location First Energy/Penelec Property - East Section MN C7 N, OFE

Inspection Requirements (Check the appropriate Yes/No answer.) I Yes No I N/A

1. Havesuffidentsurveys (i.e., postremediation. charaderizaton. etc.) been obtained for the survey unt? =

2. Do the surveys (frorn Question 1) demonstrate that the survey unit will most likely pass the FSS? X

3. Is the physical work (ie.. remediation &housekeeping) In or around the survey unit cormplete? X

4. Have all tools, non-permanent equipment, and material not needed to perform the FSS been removed? X

5. Are the survey surfaces relatively free of loose debris (i.e., dirt concrete dust, metal filings, etc.)?_

6. Are the survey surfaces relatively free d riquids (i.e., water, moisture, oil. etc.)?

7. Are the survey surfaces free of all paint, which has the potential to shield radiation? X

8. Have the Surface Measurement Test Areas (SMITA) been established? (Refer to Exhib 2 for Instructions.)

9. Have the Surface Measurement Test Areas (SMTA) data been collected? (Refer to Exhibit 2 for instrucions.) X

10. Are the survey surfaces easily accessible? (No scaffolding, high reach. etc. is needed to perform the FSS) X

11. Is lighting adequate to perform the FSSX

12. Is the area industrially safe to perform the FSS? (Evaluate potential fall &trip hazards, confined spaces. etc) X

13. Have photographs been taken showing the overall condition of the area? X

14. Have afl unsatisfactory conditions been resolved? X NOTE: If a 'No answer is obtained above. the Inspector should immediately correct the problem or Initiate corrective actions through the responsible site department, as applicable. Document actions taken and/oijustifications in the Comments section below. Attach addrtional sheets as necessary.

Comments:

Response to Question 3: Concrete surfaces need to be swept off prior to FSS. Notified L Shamenek.

Response to Question 6: Water is present on East border of survey unit. Notified survey designer.

Survey Unit Inspector (printsign) D. Sarge / Date 3/21105 Survey Designer (print/sign) . -~jS v Date

- "0t4Q to

- KT?-I

I

- - . .. - . - I ........- -.-- ---- - - - ------

ORIGINIAL EXH-UBIT 3 I I Surface Measurement Test Area (SMTA) Data Shie*~

.;.> . ~.

.>  ;-ArS ~ O . t t -

SMTA Number SMTA-0L13-1 T SurveyUnit Number OLI3 SMTA Location First Energy/Penelec Prope"ty East Section Survey Unt Inspea:tcr D. Sarge Date 3121105 Time, 1400 1*1 2K..~'. ...  ; ~E~4O zALPKRANFORMATIONW-Pe ONfWEL1NIpVOLyE~r: 2.-

Caliper Manufacturer Mitotoyo Caliper Model Nunber CO-a, Cs Caliper Serial Nutmber 763893 Calibration Due Date (as applicabe) NIA Rad Con Technician I 0. Sarge Date z /1/05 Timej 1400 Survey Unit Inspector Approval D. Sarge I Pate D 3121105

• -.t-;' .I...;' Eo3 R M.ttv.s82,;e@ :w;:  !;

SMTA Gnd Map & Measurement Results in Units of mm (Insert Results in While Blocks Below) . Ccm.nents

, .2'_~ _6

7. . _

. Concrete slabs (see aonmpanying photos) 4,0 03 4 O.9 0.3 04 . Measiemont Was obtained on slao exhibiting

_,z -. . -, 4-; ,:,,,* ,-'@, -,, l rse surface eegradztion.

0.7 05 11 4.1 3.5 0 4.3 1.3 0.7 34 2.2 1.7 I4 ,;;.. _.22. ;5 34J_..__

06 0.74 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.8,

__ .. 3J. ' - J.. : S 4"2X 12.1 15 10 14 5 4 45 4.0 2.0 1.7 08 2.3 Average Measurement - 3.3 nmn Additional Measurements Required :.

A.T 77 C4/W q -z-ZO i)Vd

ORIGINAL EXHfl3IT 3 Sudace Measswemeift Test Area (SMTA) Data Sheet

- - - $EC-lON 1. 5C~lPflOv >4T *-f *N -;;

.C .-

$,%ITA Number SMTAOL13-2 Survey Unit Number OL13 SMTA Location First Energy]Penelec Prope"ty East Section Survey Unit InspeclorI 0. Sarge -ate D 3121105 Time 1415

'_ .,;. .;SECTON

,';.E, Z^-.iR

,EORTION & PR,5S'NJEI'lYORLD:' .'.',

Caliper Manufacturer Mitotoyo Caliper Model Number i CO-6 CS Caliper Serial Number 763093 Calibration Due Date (as app!icable) NtA Rad Con Technician D. Sarge Date 3/21105 rrime l 1415 Survey Unit inspector Approval D. Sarge I Date. 3/21/05

~~~*.,;;

E G<*IO N 3a o.8.. ... sM ... U RM ~ -?

SMTA Grid Map &Measurement Results in Units of nm CcmmentS (Insert Results in White Blocks Beow)

• Concrete slats (sce accompanying photcos) 2 14

• Measurement was obtained on slab etibitina 2 *0':Z~.'3 worse surface degradation.

l Slabs are partially embeeded in earth 10.8 55 6 15 le 74 IO.5 7.0 .11 8.4 16 12

-: . w, ~,

-W S , 4.!

14 15 S 7.3 21 25 18.6 96 10.7 18 10 17,

¶8 ZA Q '

Z.2 13 21.5 216 34 15 Averace Measurement - 17.4 mna Mdditionai Measurements Required ._ I

. - !I I ' .,

c~gHr 9-

. iV-: f 1r= E Fc V0 2EVd

Appendix B, C, D DQA Surface Soil Report Assessment Summary Site: OL13 Planner(s): Tristan M.Tritch Survey Unit Name: OL1 31/(

Report Number I Survey Unit Samples: . 14 Reference Area Samples: 0 Test Performed: Sign Test Result: Not Performed Judgmental Samples: o EMC Result Not Performed Assessment

Conclusion:

Reject Null Hypothesis (Survey Unit PASSES)

Retrospective Power Curve V I 0.9

• 0.8

< OS II -- -

II ----- 3-.

r 0 I I -:--

• ._O *1 -- I 0.4 P, 0.3 I I -- 1 Os I I --

X' 0.1 II -- ____

1! _____ -- ____

0 1 2 3 4 S 6 Soil Concentration CiMg), includ~ng hlkgrnd

-- Prospective Power -beta -i.- ActualPower

- LBGR -- Estnated Power

- DCG -- Retrospective Power

. Appeotilx., B 612)2005 Page 1 vl.0.0 COMPASS v1.0.0 6nnoo5 Page I

. i - . . , -

DQA Surface Soil Report Survey Unit Data NOTE: Type = S" Indicates survey unit sample.

Type = W Indicates reference area sample.

Sample Number Type Cs-137 (pCI~g)

AFIl SP1 S 0.14 AF108 SP2 S 0.17 AF106 SF3 'S 0.18 AF103 SP4 S 0.37 Al110 SPS S 0.14 A1107 SP6 S 0.16 Ai104 SP7 S 0.25 Ai101 SP8 S 0.12 Ai98 SP9 S 0.2 AKt11 SP10 S 0.15 AK108 SP11 S 0.16 AK106 SP12 S 0.15 AK103 SP13 S 0.16 AK100 SP14 S 0.14 Basic Statistical Quantities Summary Statistic Survey Unit Back-around DOO Results Sample Number 14 N/A N=1 1 Mean (pCVg) 0.18 NIA 0.5 Median (pCVg) 0.16 N/A NUA Std Dev (pCVg) 0.07 NJA 0.3999 High Value (pCVg) 0.37 N/A N/A Low Value (pCi/g) 0.12 NUA N/A Pa

_MASS COMPASS v1.0.0 6/212005 Page 2

- -: . -: .. . II .

DQA Surface Soil Report Assessment Summary Site: OL13 Planner(s): Tristan M. Tritch Survey Unit Name: OL13-2I Report Number I Survey Unit Samples: 13 Reference Area Samples: 0 Test Performed. Sign Test Result: Not Performed Judgmental Samples: O EMC Result: Not Performed Assessment

Conclusion:

• Reject Null Hypothesis (Survey Unit PASSES)

Retrospective Power Curve

-. In

'A 19.0.9 r-x 0.8

! .7 Us.

_; l . * . ,. .. , _

,r 05 0.4

.5 0.3 .. - ____ _-

r- 02

. . s, 7. 7T1=

• _,

'd 0.1 0

o-0 I 2 3 4 5 6 Soil Concentratiox (Cig),iurcuwi iaiskgrouia

- - Prospective Power M 1-beta ---- Actual Power

- LBGR - - Estrated Power

- DCGL --- Retrospective Power Appndix -

V COMPASS v1.0.O 6122005 g I Page

-DQA Surface Soil Report Survey Unit Data NOTE: Type = "S" indicates survey unit sample.

Type = TR" Indicates reference area sample.

Sample Number Type C:s-13T (pCUg)

AM109SP1 S 0.12 AM106SP2 S 0.13 AM104SP3 S 0.13 AM101 SP4 S 0.16 AP110SP5 S 0.15 AP108 SP6 S 0.13 AP105SP7 .S 0.15 AP102SP8 S 0.14 AR112SP10 S 0.13 AR109 SP1I S 0.19 AR106 SP12 S 0.16 AR104 SP13 S 0.17 AR101 SP14 S 0.1 Basic Statistical Quantities Summary Statistic Survey Unit Background . DQO Results Sample Number 13 *N/A N=1 1 Mean (pClg) 0.14 N/A 0.25 Median (pCig) 0.14 N/A N/A Std Dev (pCig) 0.02 N/A 0.4365 High Value (pCVg) 0.19 NUA N/A Low Value (pCVg) 0.10 NUA NUA 61212005 Page 2 COllPASS vI.0.0 COMPASS v1.0.0 Page 2

.. -" I

., . I I .. .

tDQA A.essme,,t-Surface Soil Report SuImma Assessment Summary Site: 0.-L13 Planner(s): Tristan M. Tritch Survey Unit Name: OL13-3/

Report Nuinber 1 Survey Unit Samples: 14 Reference Area Samples: 0 Test Performed: Sign Test Result: Not Performed Judgmental Samples: 0 EMC Result Not Performed Assessment

Conclusion:

Reject Null Hypothesfs (Survey Unit PASSES)

Retrospective Power, Curve .

V on

0. _ -7.

,X 0.

• __1*

la I

r 0.7 0.6 1]- _ _

• _ 0.5 c0.2 I D

r. _O

• 4- _ I_

it 0.1

• iJ ___

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Soil Conentration IjpCi/g),hitblizlgackground

- - Prospectl'e Power U 1-beta ---- ActualPower

- LBGR - - Esinat Power DCGL --- Retrospective Power Apperidwx p Pg Page I i COMPASS v1.0.0 vl.0.D COMPASS 6/2005

.q

_ ..