BVY 03-069, Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report for Period January - June 2003

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report for Period January - June 2003
ML032320200
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point, Pilgrim, Vermont Yankee, FitzPatrick  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/18/2003
From: Kansler M
Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, NRC/FSME
References
BVY 03-069, ENO 1.2.03.096, JPN-03-021, NL-03-133
Download: ML032320200 (23)
v • d • e


Text

Entergy Nuclear Northeast Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

-Etey m

-6d Entergy 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Tel 9142723200 Fax 914 272 3205 Michael R. Kansler President August 18, 2003 JPN-03-021 NL-03-133 ENO 1.2.03.096 BVY 03-69 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop O-PI-17 Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units No. 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos.50-003, 50-247, and 50-286 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-271 Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January - June 2003

Dear Sir or Madam:

This letter transmits the James A. FitzPatrick, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Fitness-for-Duty Program performance reports for the period from January through June 2003 in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.71(d). The FitzPatrick report is Attachment I; the combined Indian Point 1, 2, and 3 report is Attachment II; the Pilgrim report is Attachment Ill, and the Vermont Yankee report is Attachment IV.

-AC)g I

There are no new commitments made in this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Charlene Faison at 914-272-3378.

Very truly yours ichael R. Kansi

/ President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Attachments: As stated cc:

Regional Administrator, Region I Senior Resident Inspector, M/S 66 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 475 Allendale Road 600 Rocky Hill Road King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 Plymouth, MA 02360 Resident Inspectors Office Mr. Travis L. Tate, Project Manager Indian Point Unit 3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 337 Mail Stop 0-8-BIA Buchanan, NY 10511 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Resident Inspectors Office US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Patrick D. Milano, Project Manager P.O. Box 136 Project Directorate I Lycoming, NY 13093 Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Guy Vissing, Project Manager Mail Stop 0-8-C2 Project Directorate I Washington, DC 20555-0001 Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. John L. Minns, Project Manager Mail Stop 8C2 Project Directorate IV-1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Resident Inspectors Office Mail Stop 7-D-1 Indian Point Unit 2 Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 38 Buchanan, NY 10511-0038

cc: Cont'd Mr. R. M. Pulsifer, Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 White Flint North Mail Stop 0-8-Bl 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 USNRC Resident Inspector Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station 320 Governor Hunt Road P.O. Box 157 Vernon, VT 05354 Mr. David O'Brien Commissioner Department of Public Service 120 State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 Mr. Paul Eddy NYS Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza, Ol Floor Albany, NY 12223 Mr. Peter R. Smith, Acting President New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension Albany, NY 12203-6399

ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 I ENO 1.2.03.0961 BVY 03-69 JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2003 ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-333 DPR-59

ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January through June 2003 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71(d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-for-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1. Random testing rate;
2. Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, including results of tests using lower cutoff levels;
3. Workforce population tested;
4. Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);
5. Substances identified;
6. Summary of management actions; and
7. A list of events reported.

Fitness-for-Duty performance data for Entergy's James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant for the period January through June 2003 are provided below and in the attached tables. Data on random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6 and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.

An additional section not required by 10 CFR 26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the FitzPatrick Fitness-for-Duty program and lessons learned.

Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term contractors for the purposes of the Fitness-for-Duty Program. For this reason, the attached tables show UN/AN for data associated with long-term contractors.

RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 28.18% of employees were tested randomly. For this period, 96.08% of contractors were tested randomly. The relatively higher rate for contractors is due to the procedural safeguards in place to accommodate delayed testing of occasional vendors.

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions' implicit in 10 CFR 26.27 ("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

Pre-Access Testing A total of 41 pre-access tests were administered for employees and contractors. One prospective contractor pre-access test result was below the cut off but had a presence of alcohol. It was decided by site management that this individual would not be employed at this time.

1

ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Emplovee Random Testing A total of 258 employee random tests were administered. Two tests were positive for alcohol. The affected employees were referred to Employee Assistance Program, and were placed on accelerated testing.

Contractor Personnel Random Testing A total of 76 contractor random tests were administered. One tested below cut off level but had a presence of alcohol and was placed on accelerated testing. All follow-up testing have been negative.

For Cause Testing There were 2 employee for-cause tests performed during this period. Both were for observed behavior. All test results were negative. Both individuals were put on administrative hold, pending an investigation. One employee returned to work on an intensified behavioral observation program. The other individual resigned his Entergy employment. There were no contractor for-cause tests required for this period.

Follow UP Testing There were (18) employee and (3) contractor follow up tests administered this reporting period, and all test results were negative.

Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. There were 7 atypical tests (6-employee and 1-prospective employee). The 6 repeated test results for the employees were negative. The 7 individual was not employed; therefore the repeat test was not administered. Two DOT tests were also performed (with a lower alcohol cutoff at 0.02) and the results were negative.

Events Reported One Entergy supervisor tested positive for alcohol. The NRC was notified by phone within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The employee was referred to EAP rehabilitation and subsequently returned to work on an accelerated testing program, with negative findings during this report period.

Lessons Learned and Program Events No negative performance Indicators were identified during this period.

Entergy received information from an industry OE that synthetic urine sample was used by certain contractors at another site. To address this issue, Entergy's Indian Point Energy Center (IP2 and IP3) is taking the lead in evaluating its effect on the FFD program, to develop necessary educational material, and to identify and recommend any potential programmatic changes for implementation at other ENO plants. Additional details will be provided in the next FFD report period.

2

ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Fitness for Duty Program Perfonnance Data Personnel Subject to IOCFR26 Entergy Nuclear Operations. Inc. 06-30-03 Company 6 Months Ending James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Location Pamela D. Stell (315) 349-6412 Contact Name Phone (include area code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) [X] Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 100 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 Cocaine 300 1 150 Phencyclidine 25 25 Opiates 300 1 300 Alcohol(%BAC) 0.04 0.04 Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with 915.5 N/A 79.1 Unescorted Access Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 11 0 N/A N/A 30 0 For Cause Post accident 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 Observed 2 0 N/A N/A 0 0 behavior Random 258 2 N/A N/A 76 0 Follow-up 18 0 N/A N/A 3 0 Other 2-DOT 0 N/A N/A 1-Atypical 0 6-Atypical Total 297 2 N/A N/A 110 0 3

ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phency- Alcohol Refusal 1 2 3 4 5 cidine to Test Licensee Employees/ 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Prospective Employees _ _ __

Contractors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 01010 I _ O 0 2 O _ 1 _ 2 4

ATTACHMENT If TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS NO. 1, 2, and 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2003 ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. I DOCKET NO.50-003 DPR-5 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 DPR-26 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 DOCKET NO. 50-286 DPR-64

ATTACHMENT II TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 I ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center Units No.1, 2, and 3 Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January through June 2003 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71 (d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-For-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1. Random testing rate;
2. Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, including results of tests using lower cutoff levels and tests for other drugs;
3. Workforce population tested;
4. Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for cause, etc.);
5. Substances identified;
6. Summary of management actions; and
7. A list of events reported.

Fitness-For-Duty performance data for the Entergy's Indian Point Energy Center for the period from January through June 2003 are provided below and in the attached tables.

The random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1,6,and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2,3,4, and 5) are given in the attached tables.

An additional section not required by 10CFR26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the Indian Point Energy Center Fitness-For-Duty program and lessons learned.

Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term for the purposes of the Fitness-For Duty program. For this reason, the attached tables show iNIAK for data associated with long-term contractors.

RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period 26.4% of the personnel in the testing pool were tested randomly.

I

ATTACHMENT II TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 I ENO 1.2.03.096/ BVY 03-69

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27

("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

Pre-Access Testinq A total of 713 (214-employee and 499-contractor) pre-access tests were performed.

There were five (5) confirmed positive tests for contractors; two (2) for marijuana and three (3) for cocaine. All individuals were denied access for three (3) years. There were two (2) employees pre-access positive test results for alcohol. One individual was denied access for the period of one (1) year and the second individual was permanently denied access as a result of a prior arbitration agreement.

Emplovee Random Testing There were 301 random tests conducted for licensee employees. There was one (1) confirmed positive test for alcohol. The individual was referred to EAP. After being cleared by the EAP and MRO the individual underwent return-to-work testing and is now in the follow-up testing program.

Contractor Personnel Random Testina There were 101 contractor random tests conducted. One contractor was positive for cocaine and was denied access for the period of three (3) years.

For-Cause Testing There were twenty-six (26) for-cause tests performed during this period. There were eight (8) employee for-cause tests conducted. Four (4) were as a result of post accident issues and four (4) were for behavior concerns. All test results were negative.

There were eighteen (18) contractor for-cause tests performed. Seven (7) were for as a result of post accident issues. All test results were negative. There were eleven (11) for-cause tests performed on contractors as a result of behavior concerns. Three (3) were positive. One Individual was positive for alcohol and denied access for one year. Two (2) individuals were positive by refusal to complete testing. The individuals did not have unescorted access but were working in the Owner Controlled Area (OCA). The contractors' employer was notified and the individuals were denied access to the site permanently.

Follow-up Testing There were forty (40) follow-up tests conducted during this period. All test results were negative.

2

ATTACHMENT II TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine.

There were six (6) tests conducted. One test was cancelled by the laboratory due to insufficient amount of urine sample provided. A second sample was collected and the test result was negative. The remaining five (5) test results were negative.

EVENTS REPORTED There were no reportable events during this period. No performance indicators were identified during this period.

LESSONS LEARNED AND PROGRAM EVENTS During this period the laboratory's courier van carrying the samples to the lab was stolen. There were 58 FFD specimens that were lost. All samples were recollected within twelve (12) hours of the notification and all samples tested negative.

In response to an industry OE notice regarding the discovery that a certain group of contractors were using synthetic urine as their pre-access sample prompted IPEC to purchase a sample of synthetic urine. The sample was processed through the FFD testing system as a pre-access sample unbeknownst to the lab or MRO. Pictures were taken to document color, temperature and other characteristics of the synthetic urine.

The sample processed through the lab as negative satisfying all laboratory-testing standards including the adulteration panel.

The facility that had issued the OE was contacted for information regarding what steps they had taken to prevent this from recurring in the future. These additional precautions in addition to the visual record helped to increase awareness among the IPEC FFD collectors as to what they should be particularly aware of. It helped to increase awareness in the attempt to identify the usage of a synthetic urine product.

Each FFD collector is required to view the pictures and have a discussion on the implications of the synthetic urine discovery.

Indian Point Energy Center (IP2 and IP3) is taking the lead in evaluating the effect of the synthetic urine issue on the FFD programs at the other Entergy plants (James A.

FitzPatrick, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee), to develop necessary educational material, and to identify and recommend potential programmatic changes for implementation at these other ENO plants. Additional details will be provided in the next FFD report period.

3

ATTACHMENT II TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center Units 1,2 and 3 For the Period January through June 2003 Table 11-1 Personnel Subject to IOCFR26 Enterav Nuclear Operations. Inc. June 30. 2003 Company 6 Months Ending Indian Point Energy Center Location Sharon Quinn (914) 788-2193 Contact Name Phone (include area code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) [X] Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50 /15 Amphetamines I 1,000 / 500 Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine I 25 /25 Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04%

Testing Results Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with 1147 N/A 374 Unescorted Access Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 214 2 N/A NIA 499 5 For Cause Post accident 4 0 N/A N/A 7 0 Observed 4 0 N/A N/A 11 3 behavior Random 301 1 N/A N/A 101 1 Follow-up 24 0 N/A N/A 16 0 Other 2 0 N/A N/A 4 0 Total 549 3 N/A NIA 638 9 4

ATTACHMENT Il TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03-096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center Unit 1,2 and 3 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data For the Period January through June 2003 Table 11-2 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Arnphe- Phency- Alcohol Refusal 1 2 3 4 5 tamines dildine to Test Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Long-Term Contractors N/A N/A N/A N/A NMA N/A N/A NMA N/A N/A N/A N/A Short-Term Contractors 2 4 0 0 0 1 2 N/A N/A N/A I N/A N/A Total 12 4 1 0 10101 4 1 2 N/A N/A JN/AM N/A IN/A 12 5

ATTACHMENT III TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2003 ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-293 DPR-35

ATTACHMENT IlIl TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January through June 2003 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71(d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile, and submit Fitness-For-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1. Random testing rate; 2 Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, Including results of tests using lower cutoff levels and tests for other drugs; 3 Workforce population tested;
4. Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e. pre-access, random, for cause, etc.);
5. Substances Identified;
6. Summary of management actions;
7. A list of events reported.

Fitness-For-Duty performance data for Entergy's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station for the period from January through June 2003 are provided below and in the attached tables. The random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6, and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining Items (2,3,4, and 5) are given in the attached tables.

An additional section not required by 10CFR26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the Pilgrim Fitness-For-Duty program and lessons learned.

Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term for the purposes of the Fitness-For-Duty program. For this reason, the attached tables show " N/A " for data associated with long-term contractors.

RANDOM TEST RATE During this period, 28.76% of the total workforce was tested.

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27

("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

1

ATTACHMENT IlIl TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Pre-Access Testing During this period, a total of 766 pre-access tests were administered. Thirty (30) tests were for licensee employees and all test results are negative. The other 736 tests were contractors and there were 9 positive tests (6-Marijuana, 2-Cocaine, 1-Alcohol). Access was denied for these 9 individuals.

Emplovee Random Testinq During this period, there were 237 random tests conducted on licensee employees. All test results were negative.

Contractor Personnel Random Testing There were 110 contractor random tests conducted during this period. There was 1 positive test for Alcohol. The contractor was terminated and access was denied for one year.

For-Cause Testing There were a total of 12 for cause tests performed during this period. Four (4) were licensee employees (1-Post Accident, 3-Observed behavior), and 8 were contractors (7-Post Accident, 1-Observed behavior). All test results were negative.

Follow-up Testing A total of 52 follow-up tests were performed during this period. Fourteen (14) were for licensee employees and thirty-eight (38) were for contractors. All test results were negative.

Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. For this period, there were seven (7) integrity checks performed, following the initial Pre-Access testing for contractors. One repeated test result was positive for Marijuana. The other 6 integrity checks were negative. These 7 integrity checks are included in the counts under "Pre-Access Testing".

EVENTS REPORTED There were no events during this time period (January through June) that required reporting to the NRC.

LESSONS LEARNED AND PROGRAM EVENTS No negative performance indicators were identified during this period. Entergy received information from an industry OE that synthetic urine sample was used by certain contractors at another site. To address this issue, Entergy's Indian Point Energy Center (1P2 and IP3) is taking the lead in evaluating its effect on the FFD program, to develop necessary educational material, and to identify and recommend any potential programmatic changes for.

implementation at other ENO plants. Additional details will be provided in the next FFD report period.

2

ATTACHMENT IlIl TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data For the Period January through June 2003 Personnel Subject to I OCFR26 Enteray Nuclear Operations. Inc. June 30.2003 Company 6 Months Ending Pil-rim Nuclear Power Station Location Lisa Lapevrouse (508) 830-8285 Contact Name Phone (include area code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) [XI Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50/100 1 15 Amphetamines 1000 l 500 Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 25 Opiates 300 I 300 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% 0.04%

Testing Results Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with 738.69 N/A 467.94 Unescorted Access Categories ##

Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 30 0 N/A N/A 736* 9*

For Cause Post accident I 0 NIA N/A 7 0 Observed 3 0 N/A N/A 1 0 behavior Random 237 0 N/A N/A 110 1 Follow-up 14 0 N/A N/A 38 0 Other 0 0 N/A N/A 0* 0*

Total 285 0 N/A N/A 892 10

  • Note: The counts for Other" are included in the "Pre-Access Testing". See narrative for details.

3

ATTACHMENT III TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data For the Period July through December 2002 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Marijuana Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphe- Phency- Alcohol Refusal 50 ng 100 ng tamines clidine to Test 1 2 3 4 5 Licensee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Employees .

Contractors 6 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 6 I 21 2 N/AI N/A N/A N/A N/A 4

ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2003 ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 5D-271 DPR-28

ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-03-021 / NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January through June 2003 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71(d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile, and submit Fitness-For-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1. Random testing rate;
2. Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, including results of tests using lower cutoff levels and tests for other drugs;
3. Workforce population tested;
4. Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e. pre-access, random, for cause, etc.);
5. Substances Identified;
6. Summary of management actions;
7. A list of events reported.

Fitness-For-Duty performance data for the Entergy's Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant for the period from January through June 2003 are provided below and in the attached tables. The random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6 and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4, and 5) are given in the attached tables.

RANDOM TEST RATE During this period, 30.01% of the total workforce was tested.

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions' implicit in 10 CFR 26.27

("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

Pre-Access Testing For the period from January through June of 2003, a total of 156 pre-access tests were administered. 54 of these tests were licensee employees. 29 of these tests were long-term contractors. The other 73 tests were short-term contractors.

One Entergy applicant tested positive for marijuana. Three short-term contractors tested positive. One used an adulterated specimen, one tested positive for marijuana and the other tested positive for cocaine.

Of the four positive pre-access tests, three were denied access for five years. The fourth had the adulterated specimen and was permanently denied access.

I

ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 / ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Emplovee Random Testing Between January and June of 2003, there were 184 tests for licensee employees. All test results were negative.

Contractor Personnel Random Testing There were 65 long-term contractor random tests and 19 short-term contractor random tests conducted between January and June of 2003. All test results were negative.

For-Cause Testing Two long-term contractors were tested For-Cause (1-Post Accident, 1-Observed Behavior). The test results were negative.

Follow-Up Testing A total of four follow-up tests (1-licensee employee and 3-contractor) were conducted between January and June of 2003. The licensee employee test and two long-term contractor tests were performed with negative results. The third long-term contractor test was a refusal to test and counted as a positive, which resulted in permanent denial of access.

Other Testing Between January and June of 2003, no abnormal integrity checks were required.

EVENTS REPORTED An event report (ER #20030351) was issued during this reporting period regarding the minimum random testing rate was not met (i.e., 50% annually) during the previous semi-annual reporting period.

LESSONS LEARNED AND PROGRAM EVENTS As an immediate corrective action, the testing rate was raised and a separate algorithm was created to ensure the proper testing rate during this reporting period. A new AccessIFFD database was designed and is in the testing phase at this time to eliminate this issue from recurring.

Entergy received information from an industry OE that synthetic urine sample was used by certain contractors at another site. To address this issue, Entergy's Indian Point Energy Center (IP2 and IP3) is taking the lead in evaluating its effect on the FFD program, to develop necessary educational material, and to identify and recommend any potential programmatic changes for implementation at other ENO plants. Additional details will be provided in the next FFD report period.

2

ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-03-021 I NL-03-133 1 ENO 1.2.03.096 / BVY 03-69 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report - Personnel Subject to IOCFR26 Section I - Company Data Company: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power SIx-MonthPeriod: /11/2003-6/30/2003 Location: Governor Hunt Road Druas Tested For Screen/Confirmation (ng/mD P.O. Box 157 Marijuana 100M15 Vernon, VT 05354 Marijuana 50S15 Cocaine 300/150 Point of

Contact:

John Patrick, Security Manager Opiates 3001300 Amphetamines 1000/500 Phone #: (802)258-5801 Phencyclidine 25/25 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.

Section II- Testing Results Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors Average Number with Unescorted Access 534 __ _ 274 85 Categories Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Pre-Access 54 1 0 29 0 0 73 3 1 For-Cause: Post-Accident 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 For-Cause: Observed 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Random 184 0 0 65 0 0 19 0 0 Follow-up 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 Other - O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 239 1 0 99 1 1 92 3 1 Section liI - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Refusal to Marijuana Ampheta Phenyclidi Test 100/15 50/15 Cocaine Opiates Ines ne Alcohol Total Locensee Employees 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Long-Teem Contraeors 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 Short-Term Contractors 1 1 o 1 0 0o 0 03 Totals 21 2__ I_I 01 0 0 5 Generated: 7/18/2003 7:53:14 PM VYAPF 0864.06 AP 0864 Original 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=BVY_03-069,_Fitness-for-Duty_Program_Performance_Report_for_Period_January_-_June_2003&oldid=2647667"