BECO-84-051, Environ Radiation Monitoring Program Rept 16,1983
| ML20127P013 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1983 |
| From: | Harrington W BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| BECO-84-051, BECO-84-51, NUDOCS 8507020285 | |
| Download: ML20127P013 (134) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1
~
PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT NO.16 JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,1983 ISSUED: APRIL 1984 BY: NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH AND SAFETY GROUP BOSTON EDISON COMPANY
"!P E888! !!a88am R PDR f h5
\\\
BOSTON EDISDN COMPAMY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Environmental Radiation Monitoring Program REPORT NO. 16 January 1, 1983 through December 31. 1983 Prepared by: kbMu 2. 4 5 W~
Christine E. Bowman l
Senior Radiological Engineer l
Approved by: n:a-s- < /bst:c f Thomas L. Sowd6n i Environmental and Radiological
! Health and Safety Group Leader l
Date of Submittal: April 1,1984 i
' - - ' - *T-' ,,- e-,,.. _, . , , . . , , - , . _ . _
I
~~
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I Introduction and Summary 1-1 II Description of Monitoring Program 2-1 III Results of Analyses 3-1
'A. Air Particulates 3-5 B. Iodine 3-10 C. Soil 3-14 D. Direct Radiation 3-15 E. Waterborne 3-26 HF. Shellfish 3-29
' E. Algae (Irish Moss) 3-32 H. Lobster (Arthropods) 3-36
- 1. Fish 3-39 J. Sefiments 3-42 K. Milk 3-47
.L. Cranberries 3-54 M. Vegetation 3-57 l
N. Forage 3-60 IV References 4 -1 l
Appendix-A Anomalons Measurement Reports A-1 Appendix B Radioactive Effluents B-1 Appendix C Soil Survey C-1 Appendix D Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program D-1 Appendix.E 1983 Garden and Milk Animal Survey E-1 i
l I
LIST OF TABLES Table Number Page I-I PNPS-1 Capacity Factors 1-3 III-A-1 Sample Station Identification Codes 3-3 III-A-2 ERMAP Results - Air Particulate Filters 3-6 III-B-1 ERMAP Results - Charcoal Cartridges 3-11 III D-1 Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Locations 3-19 III-D-2 Results of TLD Measurements - Quarter JB 3-2D III-D-3 Results of TLD Measurements - Quarter #2 3-21 III-D-4 Results of TLD Measurements - Quarter 43 3-22 III-D-5 Results of TLD Measurements - Quarter 44 3-23 III-D-6 Quarterly AveraDe Exposure Rates 3-24 III-D-7 Field Survey Exposure Rates 3-25 III-E-1 ERMAP Results - Waterborne 3-27 III-F-1 ERMAP Results - Shellfish 3-3D III G-1 ERMAP Results - Algae 3-34 III-H-1 ERMAP Results - Lobster 3-37 111-1-1 ERMAP Results - Fish 3-4D III-J-l ERMAP Results - Sediments 3-44 III-J-2 Results of Sediment Analysis for Plutonium 3-46 III-K-1 ERMAP Results - Milk 3-50 III-L-1 ERMAP Results - Cranberries 3-55 III-M-1 ERMAP Results - Vegetation 3-58 III-N-1 ERMAP Results - Forage 3-61 l
l l
11 t
1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Number EiLi!!L III-A-1 Gross Beta Activity - Air Particulates - 3-08 Indicator Stations III-A-2 Gross Beta Activity - Air Particulates - 3-09 Control Station III-B-1 Concentrations of I-131 - Charcoal Filter - 3-12 Indicator Stations III-B-2 Concentrations of I-131 - Charcoal Filter 3-13 Control Station III-K-1 Concentrations of Cs-137 in Milk 3-52 III-K-2 Concentrations of Sr-90 in Milk 3-53 i
i I
l l
111 l
i t
0 l
l
I
- 1. Introduction and Sumary l
This report presents a sumary of the results of measurements of direct radiation and radioactivity in environmental media in the vicinity of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1 (PNPS-1) and at selected control locations for the period .lanuary 1 - December 31, 1983. The results of this Program indicate that PNPS-1 has had a negligible and most often insneasurably small impact on the environment in the vicinity of the plant. Conservatively, estimated doses resulting from the measured highest station mean concentrations are typically less-than 1% of the doses resulting from naturally occurring radionuclides and residual fallout from previous atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
Estimates.of concentrations of radionuclides in vegetation and milk and estimates Jof dose to man, as quoted in this report, were made using methods similar to those described in Regulatory Guide 1.109 and 1.111.
The performance record of the PNPS-1 for the calendar year of 1983 reflects an average capacity factor of.80.35. Monthly capacity factors are given in Table I-1.
'A tabulation of radioactive effluents from the PNPS-1 is provided in Appendix B for the 1983 calendar year.
There were no Ananalous Measurement Reports made for the calendar year of 1983.
1-1
r- )
l l
l Essentially, all samples required by the PNPS-1 Technical Specifications were collected on schedule. The only exceptions were the unavailability of one milk sample location, three milk samples, one air sampling location from 5/10/83 until 8/23/83, plus occasional failures of the air samplers, and three fish samples and one lobster sample due to unavailability. In addition, a total of eight TLDs were found to be missing from their field locations during 1983.
These incidents affected only about 2% of the total number of samples scheduled for collection.
The Plimoth Plantation was not available as a milk sampling location during 1983. Plimoth Plantation inforned Boston Edison in January 1981 that milk producing animals would no longer be available as they disposed of their cow. This situation had not changed for 1983. During 1983
., three milk samples were unavailable from the Plymouth County Farm. ~These unavailable samples occurred in early May, late July and late September.
l The East Breakwater air sampling station was without power from the week of 5/10/83 until the week of 8/23/83. loss of power to this air sampling station was immediately reported to the Control Room upon discovery on 5/10/83.
1-2
(-
t TABLE I-1 i
PNPS-1 1983 (Based on 670 MWe)
Month Percent CaDacity January 98.0 February 90.0 March 97.3 April 89.7 May 97.3 June 66.2 July 80.5 August -83.1 September 86.5 October 79.0 November 78.6 December 18.1 i
Average 80.3 l
I e
1 -3
II. Des ~cription of the Monitoring Program The Radiological Monitoring Program conducted in accordance with the PNPS-1 Technical Specification is included as Appendix D. The program is essentially identical to that conducted during 1982 and incorporates supplemental provisions as specified in the Settlement Agreement between the Massachusetts Wildlife Federation and Boston Edison Company, June 9, 19772 . The exceptions to the program are as follows:
- 1) 'There is no TLD station at Saquish Neck since the Mass Wildlife
- Federation has not yet provided a means for placement and retrieval of the TLD as prescribed by the agreement noted above.
- 2) There is no longer a milk producing cow at Plimoth Plantation. The
- Plinoth Plantation location has been unavailable since 1981. The nearest dependable cow location is at the Plymouth County Farm, which is 3.5 miles from PNPS in the West sector.
'3) There is no longer a Karbott Farm. Vegetable samples are now collected at the the nearest gardens near the W and ESE site boundaries.
.The 1983 site Census conducted according to Technical Specification l
requirements determined that there are several vegetable gardens near the site boundary in the W-WNW and SE-ESE sectors (see Appendix E). In the ESE sector, the nearest garden is at the J. B. Work residence (0.6 miles ESE). A sample nf chinese cabbage was collected on 9/27/83. In the west direction, the location of the nearest observed garden of approximately 500 square feet was at the residence of M. Lloyd Evans (0.7 miles W). A sample of rhuhbarb was collected f rom this location on 9/27/83.
l l
2-1
J In addition to the above, a sample of lettuce was obtained from the Whipple Farm (1.5 miles SSW) on 9/27/83.
I The 1983 Census indicates that 5 goats are located at the Lloyd residence on Long Pong Road, however they are miniature goats (not full size) and the milk is .used for personal consumption only. Two goats were located at the Raymond residence but are no longer available at this location.
During 1983 every ef fort was made to identify.and locate milk-producing animals in the near vicinity (5 miles) of PNPS-1. The Plymouth County Farm (3.5 miles W) agreed to reparticipate in the Environmental Program in December of 19112 and sampling continued throughout 1983. The Plimoth Plantation declined to participate in the Program. The only other available milk-producing cow within 5 alles of-PNPS is located on Beaver 4
- Dan Road ~(2.5 miles S) and is owned by C. Mann. Mr. Mann provided three milk samples during 1983 (June . July and Septehr), .and stated that milk samples will again be provided starting in the. spring of 1984.
In' perspective, cows and goat locations within.a 5 mile radius of PNPS-1 are rare and transitory at-best. It is extremely unlikely that the cow-milk pathway could be responsible for even small doses to any member of the general public.
I 2-2
- III.Results and Analyses This section summarizes the results of the analyses of environmental media samples in compliance with the monitoring program described in Appendix D.
The section is divided into sub-sections, each of which describes a particular media or potential exposure pathway.
The results of analyses conducted on environmental media are maintained in a computerized data file which constitutes a data base used for statistical analyses by a computer code entitled ERMAP .
ERMAP calculates a set of statistical parameters for each radionuclide whose concentration is reported in a given environmental medium. This set of statistical parameters includes separate analyses for (1) the indicator stations, (2) the control stations, and (3) the station having the highest annual mean concentration. For each of these three groups of data, ERMAP calculates:
l
- 1) the mean value of all measured concentrations;
- 2) the square root of the mean square deviation (this is an estimate of the sample variance);
- 3) the lowest and highest calculated concentrations;
- 4) the number of positive measurements divided by the total number of measurements.
3-1
(
Entries listed under the heading LLD* are the mean of all LLD values, where each LLD equals 4.67 times the standard error of the associated background measurement.
The results of ERMAP are provided in each subsection for the appropriate nedia.In addition, plots of measured concentration as a function of sanpling time are included for certain isotopes in certain media in an i
effort to simplify interpretation of the results.
Sample station identification numbers used by the ERMAP program are provided in Table III-A-1.
i
- Lower Limit of Detection
{
l l
3-2
it TABLE III-A-1
. Sample Station Identification Codes Media Station Code Station Location Number Air Particulate 00 Warehouse (0.03 mi-SSE) and 01 Rocky Hill Road (0.8 mi-SE)
Iodine Filters 03 Rocky Hill Road (0.3 mi-WNW) 06 Property Line (0.34 mi-NW) 07 Pedestrian Bridge (0.14 mi-N) 08 Overlook Area (0.03 mi-W) 09 East Breakwater (0.35 mi-ESE) 10 Cleft Roak (0.9 mi-S) 15 Plymouth Center (4.0 mi-W-WNW) '
17 Manomet Substation (2.5 mi-SSE) 21 East Weymouth (control-21 mi-NW)
Waterborne 11 Discharge Canal 17 Bartlett Pond (1.7 mi-SE) 23 Power Point (control 7.8 mi-NNW)
Shellfish 11 Discharge Canal Outfall 12 Plymouth Harbor 13 Duxbury Bay 15 Manomet Point 24 Marshfield (Control)
Algae (Irish Moss) 11 Discharge Canal Dutfall 15 Manomet Point 22 Ellisville (Control)
Lobster (Arthropods) 11 Vicinity of Discharge Canal Off-shore 15/19 Offshore (Control)
.25 Scituate (Control)
Fish 2 Round Hill Point-Dffshore-(Control) 11 Vicinity of Discharge Canal 21 Auto Trawl Station-Offshore-(Control) 22 Offshore-(Control) 28 .Cataumet. Bourne-(Control) 29 Priest Cove-Df f shore-(Control)
Sediment 11 Rocky Point 12 Plymouth Harbor 13 Duxbury Bay 14 Plymouth Beach 15 Manomet Point 24 Marshfield (Control) l 3 -3 4
TABLE III-A-1 Sample Station Identification Codes Media Station Code Station Location Number Milk 11 Plymouth County Farm (3.5 mi-W) 21 Whitman Farm (Control-21 mi NW) 22 King Residence (12 mi-W) 28 Beaver Dam Road (2.5 mi-S)
Cranberries 13 Manomet Point Bog (2.5 mi-SE) 14 Bartlett Road Bog (2.8 mi-SSE/S) 23 Pine St. Bog (Control-17 mi-WNW)
Vegetation 11 Plymouth County Farm (3.5 mi-W) 16 Work Residence (0.6 mi-ESE) 17 Evans Garden (0.7 mi-W) 27 Bridgewater Farm (Control-20 mi-W) 43 Whipple Farm (1.5 mi-SSW)
Beef Forage 11 Plymouth County Farm (3.5 mi-W) 21 Whitman Farm (Control-21 mi-W) 27 Bridgewater Farm (Control-20 mi-W) 3-4
~
III.A. Air Particulate Filters Sample collection systems consisting of a cellulose particulate filter and a charcoal filter cartridge are used to collect particulate matter and iodine isotopes respectively. Analyses of the particulate filters for beta radiation is performed weekly. In addition, quarterly composite particulate samples are analyzed for gamma emitting isotopes. Table III-A-2 presents the results of the ERMAP for air particulate analyses. (The station identification numbers correspond to the locations identified in Table III-A-1).
For ease of interpretation of these measurements, a plot of gross beta activity vs. time for all indicator stations is provided in Figure III-A-1 and for the control station in Figure III-A-2.
Positive measurements of specific isotopes characteristic of reactor operation were not observed in any of the quarterly composite samples.
The MDC for gross beta analysis for Station #00 (Warehouse) collected on B/9/83 was not met due to a broken connection between the filter and the pump, thus the volume was unknown. The only positive measurements observed in the quarterly composite samples were.due to naturally occurring nuclides (Be-7, AcTh-228 and K-40).
Therefore, there was clearly no significant environmental effect observed in the air particulate nedia as a result of the operation of PNPS-1.
3-5
TABLE III-A-2 ERMAP RESULTS - AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS PELI'J: AIR FAEilCULATE UNITS: FCI/CU. M INLitATOR STATIONS STA110N WITH HIGHEST REAN CONTRDL STATIONS eteeeeeee**esseees **eensteent****eestseenee ee****eseetnesee FADICWCLIDES MEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) EM6E STA. R4EE F'NGE (NON-FDUTINEle LLD NO. IETEtiEDee NO. NO. OETECTEDe* NO. DETECTEDee SF-E (5571 .01 ( 2.6 4)E -2 00 (6.11 3.7)E -2 ( 2.6 i .3)E -2
( .11 ( 2.0 - 1930.0)E -3 ( 5.3 - 1930.0)E -3 ( B.O - 156.01E -3
- t504/5C5)* et 52/ 52)* et 52/ 5~)*
EE-7 ( 44: ( 4.2 2 .1)E-2 17 ( 4.E f .6)E -2 ( 4.1 ! .4)E -2
( Or ( 2.9 - 6.3)E -2 ( 3.6 - 6.3)E -2 ( 3.3 - 4.9)E -2
+( 40! 40)* et 4/ 4)* *( 4/ 4),
K-40 ( 441 is.72 1.01E -3 07 ( 1.6 i .51E -2 ( !.1 ! .2)E -2
( 0) (-4.2 - 22.2)E -3 ( 6.5 - 26.21E -3 ( 6.5 - 14.9)E -3
- ( 7/ 40)+ *( 1/ 4)* *( 2I 4H CE-51 ( 44) (-5.0 : 3.2tE -4 10 ( B.: 1 12.0)E -4 (-4.3 ! 100.1)E -5
( 0) i-5.3 - 4.31E -3 (-1.1 - 4.3)E -3 (-2.9 - 1.7)E -3
- ( 0/ 40)* +( O! 4)* *( 0/ 4)+
MN-54 ( 44) ( 3.2 : 4.06E -5 03 ( 2.4 ! 1.0)E -4 ( 6.0 ! 1.5)E -5 4 0) (-7.2 - 4.6)E -4 ( 2.6 - 45.7)E -5 ( 2.B - 9.2)E -5
- i O! 40)+ *( 0/ 4)+ *( 01 4)+
CD-5B ( 44) .02 (-6.5 2 3.2)E -5 05 i 2.1 ! 1.0)E -4 (-1.41 1.4?E -4
( 0) (-6.1 - 4.BIE -2 (-3.2 - 44.6)E -5 (-3.5 - 2.7)E -4 4( 0/20)* +( 0/ 4), +( 0/ 4)+
FE-54 4 44) (4.5f 10.7)E -5 06 (5.62 3.7)E -4 (-2.6 1 1.2?E -4
( C) i-1.3 - 2.7)E -3 ( E.0 - 164.0iE -5 (-4.3 - .E)E -4
- ( 0/ 40)e +( 0/ 4)+ *l 0/ 4)*
CD-60 t 44) .02 (9.42 43.7)E -6 07 (3.72 1.1)E -4 (-1.4 1 1.71E -4
( 0) i-4.9 - 7.1)E -4 ( 2.0 - 7.1)E -4 (-6.5 - 1.1)E -4 4( 0/40)* +( 01 4)+ *( 01 4)4 M-65 ( 44) (-1.5f .9)E -4 21 ( 4.9 f 2.4)E -4 ( 4.9 2.4)E-4
( 06 (-1.3 - 1.0)E -3 ( 6.1 - 110.0)E -5 ( 6.1 - 110.0)E -5
- ( 0/ 40)e +t 0/ 4)+ +( 0/ 4)4
- EDN-EUTilE RETERS TD THE ff,MSER DF SEFARATE ftEASUSEf'.ENTS WHICH WEPE SSEAfER TMN TEN (10) TitES THE A'KRASE BACFBRDt'NI TDR THE FERIDD CF THE EEFDET.
++ THE FRACTlDN OF SAMFLE ANALYSES VIELDIN3 IETECTAELE PIABL'PIPINT5 (I.E.- )3 STI LEVIATICNS) IS IO!CATED WITH +( )*.
3-6
TABLE III-A-2 CONTINUED EELIUt AIF FAR!!CUL'iE UNIT 5: FC1/CU. M 101CATDF STATIONS STATION WITH HIGHEST f(EAN CDNTRDL STATIDNS 4444449644+++++t66 44444464 t H4+444 6 t H444+4 46444496f6645564 FADIDNUCLIDEE MEAN PEA 1 MEAN (ND. ANALYSES) RANSE STA. FANEE RANGE (NON-EDUT!NEl* LLD ND. DETECTEL** O. ND. LETECTED++ C. DETECTED **
IR-95 ( 44) iE.0f 7.1)E -5 10 ( 3.3 2 2.1)E -4 (-2.51 1.8)E -4
( 0) (-B.7 - 11.3)E -4 (-2.9 - 69.2iE -5 (-6.4 - 2.2)E -4
- ( 0/ 40)+ *f 0/ 4)* it O! 4)*
RU-103 ( 44) (-1.4f .4)E -4 OB i 1.7
- 2.7)E -3 (-6.01 11.7)E -5
( 0) (-5.6 - 3.5)E -4 (-2.7 - B.6)E -5 (-3.1- 2.3}E -4 il 0/ 40)+ *( 0/ 4)* *( 0/ 4)*
fU-lh ( 441 (-3.8! 2.9)E -4 03 ( 7.E f 6.1)E -4 (-6.0i B.71E -4
( 01 (-3.9 - 3.5)E -3 (-7.0 - 22.6)E -4 (-2.3 - 1.B)E -3 el 0/ 40)+ *( 0/~ 4)* +( 0/ 4)*
1-131 ( 44) (1.31 1.3)E -3 09 ( 1.3 t 1.31E -2 (-1.3 t .71E -3
( 0) i-2.6 - 51.0if -3 (-1.2 - 51.01E -3 (-2.4- .E)E -3 44 0/ 40)+ +( 0/ 41* +1 0/ 4)*
C5-134 ( 44; .01 (-3.6 7.3*E -5 63 ( !.6 : 1.2}E -4 (!.02 0.31E -4
( 0) (-5.2 - 4.6)E -4 (-1. 0 - 4.6)E-4 (-1.7 - 0.5)E -4 44 0/ 40)+ *( 01 4)* -*( 0/ 4)+
E5-137 ( 44i .01 84.9! 43.91E -6 01 (2.91 1.51E -4 (1.32 9.911 -5
( 0) i-5.4 - 7.5!! -4 ( I.B - 73.2)E -5 (-2.3- 2.6)E -4
+( 0/ 40)* +( O! 4)* 4( 0/ 4t+
E-140 ( 446 (-2.Bi 1.3)E -4 04 (1.11 1.3)E -3 (-1.6 f 1.91E -4 1 0) t-2.3 - 4.9)E -3 (-1.2 - 4.9)E -3 (-4.7 - 3.6)E -4 el 0/ 40l* *( DI 4)* 4( 0/ 4)+
[E-141 ( 44) (2.12 1.31E -4 09 ( 1.4 2 1.1)E -3 (-5.63 25.11E -5 1 0) (-9.2 - 47.9]E -4 (-1. 6 - 47.9)E -4 (-7.4 - 4.6)E -4 41 0/ 40)* +t 01 416 *( 0/ 4)+
EE-144 ( 44) I 3.6 f 16.11E -5 17 ( B.! f 2.2)E -4 (1.72 2.11E-4
( 01 (-2.9 - 1.71E -3 ( 4.7 - 14.5)E -4 (-1.9 - 7.5)E -4 4( O!4014 4! O! 41* *( 0/. 4)+
AE-229 ( 44) (3.01 1.31E -4 09 ( 1.1 ! .51E -3 (-1.31 4.01E -4
( 01 (-E.2- 33.91E -4 (-1.9 - 33.9)E -4 (-1.3 - .4)E -3 et 0/ 40l* *( DI Ale 4( 0/ 4)*
4 EN-RDUTIIE REFEES TD THE NUMBER DF SEPARATE flea 31REMENTS WHICH WEEE EFEATEE THAN TEli (10) TIMES THE AVERAEE MEf6EDUND EDR THE PERICD OF THE REPDET.
+* THE FRACTIDN DF SAMFLE ANALYSES YIELLINB DETEITAELE REAE JEEMENTS (I.E. >3 STD LEVIATIDN5) 151CICATED WITH +( )+.
3-7
FIGURE 111-A-1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY AIR PARTICULATES INDICATOR STATIONS Ed is E .
EE E=
r mc E,'
z w- :u ou Eo
~m**S$C r.
CO E'b
$$zzzzzSSSSS e*-+-.--- -
M'mg :.
- o EC a CCCC,C 6- w - - -
.m s mamme : - 4m1 F E=
g s si il is si r u XNX-M , j3
- :=
a ; :,::
z . r. .
- g : w .=
-d !I e
w W ,
!E W :
r _2 E.a
- a, mu i=
0 o-men -
JQ.
~a55555 !I CCCCC i.
lm 6-e-+.-*>= -w ggggg {6 il 11 1818 II :-
ElO<l + X jg E"
- S1*D DI*D SD*D DD D S3-D OZ D H313W DJ/S3IBn303Id 3-8
FIGURE III-A-2 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY AIR PARTICULATES CONTROL STATION
-h o iO E
!
2g C &- EU i
- o
-w o sm d' E.
E + : a.
+.- rn MM iN O :
!E E5 OO
!5
=
2 U ! D, o
5'e
[ EwS EE i'
T 5
.E :E
.W r re-
-J i "*
E- :
- I 06 E-a*-
-n., N :.
a- ig z :z E o I
C
$ !h as E.
e
- BZ'O SI*D Ol*O S0* D DD*D SZ D 4
H3134-03/S3180303Id 3-9
III.B. Iodine The same sample collection systems used to collect airborne particulates are used to collect gaseous iodine on a charcoal filter cartridge. The cartridge is removed and analyzed for I-131 weekly.
The results of the ERMAP program for this media are provided in Table III-B-1. It is not apparent from this table that the mean value of the calculated concentrations for the indicator stations is greater than the mean value for the control station. The results of these analyses are presented graphically in Figure III-B-1 for the indicator stations and' Figure III-B-2 for the control station.
The MDC for iodine analysis was not met for two samples at Station #00 (Warehouse). For the sample collected on 7/26/83, the MDC was not met due to a low sanple volume which was the result of a kinked sample line. For the sanple collected on 8/9/83, the MDC was not met due to a broken connection between the filter and the pump, thus the volume was unknown.
There was clearly no significant environmental effect observed in the airborne gaseous iodine collection media as a result of the operation of PNPS-1.
l 1
l l
3-10
TABLE III-B-1 ERMAP RESULTS - CHARC0AL CARTRIDGES MEII'A CG.t*JL FILTER UNITS: FCl/CU. M
'!OICATGF. STATION 3 STATION WITH HIGwEST NEAN CONTRDL STATIONS enen n o n een n ut *
- e ***n nu n n e++ n e sou n++++n u n FALIGNXLitES MEAN MEAN MEAN lNG. AN' LYSES) FAN 5E STA. RANGE FANGE (NON-F.00 TINE)e LLD O. IETECTEDee ND. NO. DETECTEt++ 0. DETECTEDn l-131 (557) .07 (6.9! 1E.0)E -4 00 (l.81 1.7)E -2 (-2.2t 1.2)E -3
( 0) (-2.0 - 88.2)E -2 (-2.8 - BE.2)E -2 1-2.2 - 1.9)E -2
- ( 01505)* *i 0/ 52)* *( O!32)+
+ CN-F00 TINE FEFEF3 TO THE NUNiEF 0F SEFETE PEASUPE'IENT3 WHICH WERE GPEATER THAN TEN (10) TIMES THE AVEFA3E EACfEPDUND FCE THE FEF.10} DF THE REFORT.
- e THE FFati!0:4 Or 5AMFLE ANALYSE 5 YlELDIN3 IETECTABLE PEASUREMENTE 81.E. )3 STD IEVIATIONS1 13 ICICATES WITH H le.
3-11
4 4
FlGURE TII-B-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF I-131 CHARC0AL FILTER INDICATOR STATIONS e -- a m
I*
Em ::
$1**SSS l*
C zzzzz i
$ SSSSS "
EM e EEEEE .
- S GGGGG !!
5 SSA"E L s
_M--e z l'a l = --1 g
3 l C f d h e5 :
EE o-mor-az
-9 "U
' 2.czzz lE SSSSS F E EEEEE ..
EEGGG nnunn lE u
B O 4,+ X i.
rz b
so o so-c nok so o zo a to.o B313W -03/S3IB0303Id 3-12
o wocmm [ Iceo r n znm xya- o$ om mb ww o xno>r m.*4mm*
r -
, n 4ncr $>4- o2 "I .
C
' D E
-'7 V
,)p 'O
(
.n"N "
"T S1 -O C
N3 '
O1 I I - " .
P
"'E R '" S T t S '~.
L "G U
'R O 'r R "Y T "L N 'U O "J3
' 8 C i
" 9 t
"E1 N l
'U E "J T -7 L -
I Y E "A M "r
.L - .
R R NO 'P A
DAi "
LH 2 ,R
,A M
IC P
N0 i.
I 1 . , .
i 8 R .
E t .F i
8
= . .
! .N
.A
.J
~
Nqe e$ o Ba
.9e E*O 2
MQ WC e3uNUWwg3UcUwE i.
eTwW
' i' l ' i!
'l III.C. Soil Soil surveys at eleven locations are required once every tnree years in compliance with the revised Technical Specifications which went into effect on April 19, 1977. These in-situ surveys were conducted during May, October and December of 1982. The results of these surveys are included in Appendix C of this report.
l l
3-14
l III.D. Direct Radiation
- 1. Continuous Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) of the CaSO 4 (Dy) type are used to record direct gamma radiation from all sources including direct and scattered radiation from Nitrogen-16 in the turbine building, and cosmic and other natural and artificial gamma radiation. TLD's are installed at the locations identified in Table III-D-1.
Tables III-D-2 through III-D-5 show quarterly average doses from direct gamma radiation in uR/hr at these stations.
The measured values for the fourth quarter (Table III-D-5) indicate a problem with the majority of the TLDs used in this quarter. There were no abnormal occurrences at the Station or in the environment during this time period, and the same procedure was used in processing the TLDs. The insnediate action taken to rectify this situation was to remove the suspect TLDs f rom the program.
In addition to average doses for each TLD for each readout period, geographic regional average doses for sectors of different nearness are computed; viz, in immediate proximity to PNPS, more distant but near the site boundary, up to several 3-15
4 miles away " neighborhood", and far away (background). Each set of data show consistent trends; the near plant dosimeters (primarily OA, PB, and WS) stand out among all readings and have an average above the dose rates further away. The next region has a lower average dose rate, and beyond 0.7 miles (distant neighborhood and background) the dose rates are statistically I consistent. In all cases, the near plant levels are distinctly higher than those of f-site and of f-site dose rates are not significantly sensitive to distance variations beyond the site itself.' Thus, beyond the " exclusion area" (for this purpose, the 0.25-0.7 mile region), dose rates show no significant plant effect;. populated areas are therefore beyond the limits of elevated dose rates.
- 2. Field Survey A gamma exposure survey of Plymouth Beach and Priscilla/ White Horse Beach was conducted during August of 1983. The results of this most recent survey are in agreement with the last six beach surveys : conducted for 1977 through 1982. In addition, a comprehensive soil survey of 11 locations was conducted during the spring and fall of 1982. This study included both gamma
( exposure rate measurements and in-situ ganna spectrometry analysis for each location. Laboratory soil analyses were also conducted for selected locations. The results of this study are presented in Appendix C. The latest ganne exposure survey was I
f 3-16 l
c
. _ . _ . . , _.. - -_ - ___._ ,__.,, , m_ _ , . . _ _ , . , _ _ _ , _ _ . _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ , . _ . _ _ . , . _ _ _ , . _ . . . . - _ _ _ _ .
I
~
conducted using a Reuter Stokes RS-lli high pressure ion chamber (HPIC), Serial Number 4-1656. The design and calibration of this ,
instrument were described in the above report.
The present survey was designed to detect differences in the externai exposure rate encountered at beaches near the plant j
(Plymouth and Priscilla/ White Horse) and a control location (Duxbury). The detector's calibration was checked before each measurement. The data (Table III-D-7) indicate that the exposure '
rates at Plymouth Beach (behind Berts Restaurant) and Priscilla/ White Horse Beach are not significantly greater than
- the exposure rates measured at the control station in Duxbury. ,
The small differences are likely due .to the presence of granite beach stones which.are essentially absent at the Duxbury location. It has been demonstrated that proximity to beach stones results in higher exposure rates than in sandy areas (see Annual Report No.10) .
This survey indicates that the natural background exposure rate at beaches near Pilgrim Station is probably 6-9 uR/hr. These results are in couplete agreement with similar measurements performed in Maine , where the natural background exposure rate at shoreline locations nas found to vary between 6.6 and 14.5 uR/hr. These exposare rates were also found to vary directly 5
with the size and proximity of granite outcroppings ,
3-17
These latest measurements are also in agreement with the soil survey mentioned earlier. The results of that survey indicate that of f site dose rates have a range of 9.3 to 10.5 uR/hr with an average of 9.7 uR/hr.
i 1
~
i a
t 4
4 l
- 3-1s s
,--,.-.---n.-- ---- - - - ,,,,-. -. .--, , - - - - - - - - , - --,-,,- -
TABLE Ill-D-1 THERMOLUM!NESCENT DOSIMETER LOCATIONS
!: I- I gi 3 118 8 as I i
. .. I a.
i l.:.a o.li. :. 1 e..e.. .
1 : :::.m.a.sg1
....... a a-..li i
i 3
.ii is = s ===== ::::::: : ::: = ::::::::::::: : ::::
3- 44 4 4 44444.4444444 4 444 4 4.::.:.:444aa444 4 44.a
=
4
- i .. . .. .. __.
_.a .
8 jd id d d $$did $$$$idd i $$$ $
$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $555 I
il 13 2:2 ~** *" ~~ i* 't"* I 15" ! 5"I"111 f =1: t 20*3 34
. s I: I
.1. .
[is, s3:e _.-11..g ,
1- : g ,j as jt.d.
.: 5., ;
.3.12.
s c .: .
2 -
3 I
g3
.J.1 .= . ,
I
_l ,11 3 3 .5$15$*
jss:silii'did -*- J,2, I
'] 'a**
! I 2
z .s* 3::j:---- i :=5 i :
t ! a . i .f.l l. _! ._*
I 14 IfI .1
-
- II_' 'r. -
i 1
A. E. I. i. . E s S E .E E .& E .I .I
~. h h
.2 3=.
'11111'1111111.Jj22j ._
3-
==
le 221 .
l T3
~d 3
': .*:.. '222. t.?.t.2.:.1291_23 a = j- -
35 IIr1IIr5IIIErIIIEIli I 3=3
= z.z. .
- xx z;z. .az.z.z. 5 niIS1 .a , 5. ,.
s e .I S i 3j
-3 . 7 1 -
3:' : 2 g Ze e gg 8 1 l ;It 3
av = 4 13 .I'. .
2 3 - Y.,3=1* if a gl
- l ; ..
3-19
TABLE III-D-2 i GAMMA EXPOSURE (TLD) DATE FOR QUARTER #11983 TLD Micor/
No. Station Hour 1- 2 Sigma f
229 CP - 5.70 +- 1,44
!. 225 CR 8.16 +- 1.84
^
230 CS ND* +- ND 231 ER 9.64 4- 1.69 232 EW 6.88 +- 1.07 233 KS 12.32 +- 4.60 234 MB 12.94 +- 3.96 235 ME ND +- ND 236 MP 6.20 +- 2.22 237 MS 13.90 +- 3.47 238 NP 10.93 +- 2.63 j 265 PC .73 +- .32
, 240 SA 11.41 +- 2.38 241 SP ' , 7.77 +- 1.99 i 242 SS - 9.26 +- 3.05 243 WR 14.24 +- .2.21 244 BD 8.21 +- 1.10 245 EB 5.25 +- 1 .29 246 EM 6.90 +- '2.80 247 MT 7.03 +- :2.03 248 DA 27.49 +- -5.46 249 PA 8.66 +- 1 .51
, 250 PB 15.40 +- 2.54 2 51 WH 7.71 +- 1.60 252 A 5.29 +- 1.00 253 B 10.% +- 2.46 336 C 12.04 +- 4.52 255 S 7.94 +- 2.69 256 'F 8.22 +- .2.35 1.33 257 F 6.39 +-
258 'E 7.42 +- '2.09 259 H 13.32 4- 3.24 260 1 5.36 +- 1.15
' 347 J 3.87 +- 1.25 262 K 9.08 +- 1.90 224 L 9.36 +- 2.31 263 PL 7.10 +- 1.86 205 WS 25.07 +- 2.87 264 HB 12.23 4- 1.58 i 233 RL 2.56 +- 0.60 l
234 RL 2.70 +- D.73 Geographical Regional Averages for this period are:
Mear Plant (0 .16 mi.) 19.16 +- 3.95 Exclusion Area (.25 .68 mi.) 8.76 +- 2.32 Distant Nbrhood (.7-6.5 mi.) 9.82 +- 3.05 Background (8-21 mi.) 10.20 +- 3.74
- ND - Wo data due to missing TLD.
3-20
TABLE III-D-3 GAMMA EXPOSURE (TLD) DATA FOR QUARTER #2 1983 TLD Micror/
No. Station Hour i- 2 Siama 277 CP 4.12 +- 1.13 278 CR 6.10 +- 2.02 346 CS
- 7.38 +- 2.85 280 ER 7.36 +- 1.79 2 8'.' EW 5.15 +- .78 282 KS 6.68 +- 2.57.
283 MB 7.41 +- 1.99 349 ME ND* +- ND 285 MP 4.56 +- 1.13 286 MS 5.83 +- 1.58 287 NP 6.55 +- 2.14 288 PC 5.28 +- 1.13 289 SA 3.94 +- 1.30 290 SP 4.13 +- 1.00 291 SS 6.46 +- 1.83 292 WR 9.24 +- 2.83 293 8D 7.26 +- 2.78 294 EB 5.84 +- 2.08 295 EM 8.61 +- 2.63 296 MT 6.35 +- 1.16 297 OA 18.38 +- 2.33 298 PA 6.80 +- 1.23 3 01 PB 12.58 +- 2.53 302 WH 12.44 +- 2.71 303 A 10.05 +- 3.61 304 B 6.38 +- 2.14 352 C ND +- ND 306 D 12.14 +- 4.30 307 E 4.37 +- .96 308 F 8.11 +- 3.00 309 G 9.78 +- 2.62 310 H 15.04 +- 10.15 311 I 19.68 +- 10.79 353 J 1.17 +- .75 313 K 12.76 +- 4.68 314 L 10.55 +- 3.13 315 PL 6.94 +- 1.93 316 WS 9.05 +- 1.34 317 HB 24.35 +- 7.69 333 RL 1.75 +- 0.48
~334 RL 1.69 +- 0.39 Geographical Regional Averages for this period are:
Near Plant (0 .16 mi.) 11.70 +- 2.25 Exclusion Area (.25 .68 mi.) 10.53 +- 5.23 Distant Nbrhood (.7-6.5 mi.) 7.09 +- 2.26 Background (8-21 mi.) 5.78 +- 2.38
'*ND - No data due to missing TLD.
3 -21
TA8LE III-D-4 GAMMA EXPOSURE (TLD) DATA FOR QUARTER #3 1983 TLD Micror/
No. Station Hour +- 2 Siama 229 CP 4.34 +- .93 225 CR 6.26 +- 1.42 386 CS .34 +- .04 231 ER 5.22 +- 1.47 232 EW 8.20 +- 2.21 233 KS 6.59 +- 2.21 234 MB 7.38 +- 2.66 387 ME .14 +- .03 236 MP 9.30 +- 2.69 237 MS 10.83 +- 2.92 238 NP 5.15 +- 1.52 265 PC 5.59 +- 1.95 240 SA 14.34 +- 3.57 241 SP 6.57 +- 1.31 242 SS 5.61 +- 1.97
.243 WR 8.05 +- 1.03 244 BD 5.37 +- .99 245 E8 6.21 +- 1.94 246 EM 8.54 +- 1.53 247 MT 6.05 +- 1.69 248 OA 18.37 +- 3.53 249 PA 7.03 +- 1.71 250 PB 11.64 +- 1.79 251 WH 6.34 +- 1.67 252 A 4.11 +- .80
, 253 8 6.05 +- 1.85 336 C 8.19 +- 1.31 j
255 .D 5.70 +- 2.32 256 E 6.78 +- 1.73 257 F 3.83 +- .95 258 G 7.39 +- .79 259 H 9.14 +- 1.71 260 1 4.32 +- , 1.01 347 J 2.50 +- .50 262 K 5.55 +- .90 224 L 10.68 +- 3.15 263 PL 6.82 +- 1.91 205 WS 16.09 +- 3.01 264 H8 7.29 +- 1.85 333 RL 2.91 +- 0.68 334 RL 3.51 +- 0.94 Geographical Regional Averages for this period are:
l Wear Plant (0 .16 mi.) 13.28 +- 3.03 l
l Exclusion Area (.25 .68 mi.) 6.31 +- 1.59 Distant Nbrhood (.7-6.5 mi.) 6.56 +- 2.08 Background (8-21 mi.) 7.37 +- 2.74 l
3-22 ,
1
~
TABLE III-D-5 GAMMA EXPOSURE (TLD) DATA FOR QUARTER #4 1983 TLD Micror/
No. Station Hour 1- 2 Sigma '
277 CP 13.19 +- 5.29 278 CR 14.17 +- 4.45 346 CS 45.63 +- 9.02 280 ER 10.77 +- 2.13 281 EW 41.29 +- 11.78 282 KS 18.00 +- 2.63 ,
283 M8 17.38 +- 3.75 391 ME -3.26 +- .76 285 MP 14.53 +- 4.86 286 MS 26.85 +- 9.89 287 NP 36.62 +- 11.07 288 PC 28.51 +- 16.24 289 SA 9.11 +- 2.91 290 SP 18.94 +- 5.12 291 SS 28.92 +- 7.51 292 WR 16.36 4- 5.48 4
293 BD 11.49 +- 5.52 294 'EB 45.17 4- 23.66 295 EM 21.11 +- 5.34
~296 MT 11.77 +- 4.07 i 297 DA 31.24 +- 11.58 298 PA 13.56 +- 2.54 301 PB 18.29 +- 5.46 302 WH 23.35 +- 9.93
-303 A 20.84 +- 8.19 304 is 53.39 4- 13.23
~390 .C .96 -+- .30 306 '. D 20.70 4- 5.57 307 .E 18.57 +- 8.66
.308 F 16.91 +- 5.12 309 G 13.50 4- 6.75 310 -H 30.65 +- 11.74 311 ~I 34.14 +- 16.85 353 .J 15.10 2.25 313 K 23.71 4- 4.33 314 L 1 7.51 4- 3.34 315 PL 36.50 +- 8.98 316 WS 35.77 4- 7.20
.317 HB 25.11 -+- 7.25 333 RL 3.13 4- 1.46 334 RL 2.97 +- 0.58 i
- Geographical Regional Averages for this
- period are:
- Near Plant (0 .16 mi.) 24.72 +- 8.60 Exclusion ~ Area (.25 .68 mi.) 23.27 +- 10.46 Distant Nbrhood (.7-6.5 mi.) 21.79 +- 7.99 Background (8-21 mi.) .28.51 -+- 8.86 3-23 s _ . - _ _ . _ _ _ - . . _ _ , . , . . _ - ,
.- . . - . -. . - ._ - . _. . ~. . .--- -. . -- ._ - . - . - . _
QUARTERLY AVERAGES FOR GADMA EXPOSURE RATES 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER IST QUARTER STATION MICROR/HR MICROR/HR MICROR/HR MICR0R/HR 1 44 1.13 4.34 +- .93 13.19 +- 5.29 l.70 4- 4.12 4-
+- 4.45 CP I 84 2.02 6.26 +- 1.42 14.17 CR 8.16 +- 6.10 +.
+- 9.02 6- #8 7.33 4 2.85 .34 +- .04 45.63 C5 11 0
- IH 1.79 5.22 +- 1.47 10.77 +- 2.13 ta 9.64 6- f.36 6
+- 11.78 6 1.07 g,gg 4 .73 g.20 +- 2.21 41.29 i
Elf 6.08 4.60 2.57 6.59 +- 2.21 18.00 +- 2.63 12.32 4 6.68 4-RS 3 90 1.99 7.38 +- 2.E 17.3s +- 3.75 12.94 +- 7.41 +- +-
MS ND 6- 11 8 .14 +- .03 -3.26 .76 IIS 6- ND* +-
NE 2.22 s- 1.13 9.30 2.69 14.53 4.06 MP 6.20 4 4.56 +- +- 9.09 4- 3 4I 5.33 6 1,58 10.83 2.92 26.85 i M5 13.90 2.63 5.15 +- 1.52 36.62 +- 11.07 6.55 +- 2.14 NP 10.93 4 5.59 +- 1.95 28.51 +- 16.24
.73 +- .32 5.2s +- 1.13 PC 2.38 1.30 14.34 4- 3.57 9.11 +- 2.9) 1 SA 11.41 7.??
4-
+- I *"
3.94 4.13 6
1.00 h.57 +- 1.31 1s.94 +- 5.12 6
! SP 4- 3* 6.46 6
6- 1.93 5.61 +- 1.97 28.92 +- 7.51 Q g _,
55 9.26 +- 1.03 16.36 +- 5.48 o .-43 9.24 ,. 2.83 8.05 i
WR 80 14.24 8.21
+
4- 7.26 6 2.78 5.37 +- .99 11.49 +-
+-
5.52 23.E G@Qf a) c r m 4- s. 2.08 6.21 4- 1.94 45.17 i 18 tM 5.25 6.90 4 2.00 5.34 8.61 6 2.63 8.54 4-1.53 21.11 +-
+-
5.34 4.07
%43= ~
2.03 1.16 6.05 1.69 11.77
! Y N7 f.03 6 5.46 6.35 5
,. 2.33 18.37 +- 3.53 31.24 +- 11.50 $N
+.
l $ OA 27.49 I SI is.3s 6.80 1.23 7.03 +- 1.11 13.56 +- 2.54 -4 W c i PA 3.H 15.40 6-4 2.54 12.58 6
6- 2.53 11.64 +- 1.79 18.29 +- 5.46 "mmM Ps 1.60 2.11 6.34 4- 1.67 23.35 +- 9.93 lel 7.71 4 12.44 4- +- 8.19
+- I" e. 3.61 4.11 6- .e0 20.e4 A 5.29 10.05 6- +- 13.23 10.06 4- I 84 6.3s 4 2.14 6.05 1.e5 53.39 8 4 SI 11 0 8.19 +- 1.31 .96 +- .30 12.04 6- NO i.
C 2.69 4.30 5.70 +- 2.32 20.70 +- 5.57 7.94 +. 12.14 4
+- 8.M D
6- I 35 4.37 4- .96 6.78 +- 1.73 18.57 t 8.22 1*33 3.00 3.s3 +- .95 16.91 +- 5.12 4 39 6- s.11 4
+- 6.75 4 $
2.M g 73 4 2.62 7.39 +- .79 13.50 7.42 6 +- 11.74 I O 3.24 10.15 9.14 +- 1.71 20.65 13.32 6 15.04 4
+- 16.85 N
1.15 10.79 4.32 +- 1.01 34.14 5.36 6 19.68 4
+- +- 2.25 i 1
- p. 1.25 .1.37 4 . 15 2.50 .50 15.10 J 3.e7 +- +- 4.33 9.00 6- I *# 12.76 s. 4.60 5.55 .90 23.71
+- 3.34 a R 2.31 10.55 s. 3.13 10.68 +- 3.15 17.51 L 9.36 4 I 80 1.93 6.82 +- 1.91 36.50 +- 8.98 +
7.10 +- 6.94 +- 7.20 4 PL
,. 2.87 9.05 6- 1.34 16.09 +- 3.01 35.77 +-
W5 25.07 7.69 7.29 4- 1.35 25.11 +- 7.25 12.23 1.58 24,35 4
- HE 4 0.60 0.48 2.91 4- 0.6a 3.13 +- 1.46 2.56 4 1.75 6- +- 0.58
! RL 0.73 0.39 3.51 4- 0.94 2.97 j RL 2.70 6- 1.69 6-
\
i l
I
- TABLE III-D-7 1983 DIRECT RADIATION SURVEY RESULTS Exposure Rate Location (uR/hr+-l siama) Beach Terrain White Horse Beach 7.8+-0.5 Sand with large amount of (near Hill P. Avenue) course gravel, granite boulders near beach area (within thirty feet).
White Horse Beach 7 . 0 +-0 . 04 Sandy with small amount of gravel.
(in back of Blue Sail Bar)
Plymouth Beach ,
6.5+-0.4 Sandy. Thirty feet from (outer beach) granite boulders.
Plymouth Beach 6.2+-0.3 Sandy.
(inner beach)
Plymouth Beach B.1+-0.4 Sandy, with large amounts (behind.Berts Restaurant) of course gravel, granite boulders near beach area (fifty feet from break-water).
Duxbury Beach (Control) 7.6+-1.5 Sandy with course gravel.
(ocean side) 3-25
III.E. Waterborne Samples of seawater are collected at three locations, the Station Discharge Canal (Station 11), Bartlett Pond (Station 17 - 1.7 mi - SE) and Powder Point (Station 23 - 7.8 mi - NNW). The Discharge Canal sample is collected by a continuously compositing saneler which extracts a sample of about 20 ml of water from the Discharge Canal every one-half hour. Grab samples are taken weekly from each of the other two locations.
The results of the ERMAP program for seawater samples are presented in Table III-E-1.
There were no positive measurements Jof isotopes characteristic of reactor operation observed at any of the three sampling locations. ~ The only positive measurements observed .were due to naturally occurring isotopes (K-40 and AcTh-228).
Therefore, there was clearly no significant environmental effect observed in the seawater media as a result of the operation of PNPS-1.
3-26
TABLE III-E-1 ERMAP RESULTS - WATERBORNE PE:iLH !!3ATER L! NITS: FCI/r5 INDICATOR STATIONS STATION NITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTFDL STATIONS eteeeeeeeeeeeeeees ++eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee seeeeeeeeeeeeene RtD100CL! DES MEAk MEAN MEAN (ND. ANALYSES) FANGE STA. FAN 5E FANGE INCN-FCUTINE)* LLD hD. LETECTEtes N3. NO. CETECTEDee NO. CETECTEDee EE-7 ( 361 (l.7f 1.2)E O 23 ( 3.7 ! 2.7)E O (3.7f 2.7)E 0 -
( 01 M. ! - 1.6)E 1 (-1.7 - 1.2)E 1 (-1.7 - 1.8)E 1 et 0/ 24)* ef 0/ 12)e et 0/ 12)e K-40 ( 351 t 1.5 f .3)E 2 !! ( 3.0 t .1)E 2 ( 2.6 ! .inE 2
( 01 (-1.1 - 35.8)E 1 ( 2.6 - 3.6)E 2 ( 2.4 - 3.2)E 2 e( 12/ ~4)* *( 12/ 12)+ *( 12/ 12)e CR-51 ( 36) (-9.6! 14.8)E -1 17 (-1.6 ; 20.3)E -1 (-1.8 1 1.65E O
( 0) (-1.5 - 1.1)E 1 (-1.5 - 9)E 1 (-1.1 - .81E 1 et 0/ 24)+ *( 0/ 121e *( 0/ 12)*
MN-54 ( 36) 15. ( ~.E f 2.01E -1 17 (-1.72 3.1)E -1 (-2.3 ! 2.2)E-1
( 0} (-2.2 - 2.3)E O (-1. 5 - 2.3)E D (-1.7 - .7)E 0
+( 0/ 246+ *( 0/ 12)+ *( 0/ 12)+
CD-55 ( 36) 15. (-3.4f 19.1tE -2 17 ( 2.3 ! 2.5)E -1 (-3.7 ! 26.E)E -2
( 0) (-2.9 - 1.1)E O (-1.5 - 1.1)E 0 (-1.6 - 1.4)E O 4( 0/ 24)* et 0/ 12)* *( 0/ 12)+
FE-57 ( 36) 30. (2.9! 4.2iE -1 17 ( *.S t 5.7)E -1 ( 2.7 1 6.1)E -1
( 0) (-3.5 - 4.6)E O (-2.5 - 4.6)E 0 (-2.S - 4.0)E O et 01 24)+ *( OI 12)+ 4( 0/ 12)*
ID-60 t 36) 15. (-2.7f 2.6)E -1 17 (-1.4 2 3.7)E -1 (-5.2f 2.1)E -1
( 0) (-2.9 - 2.5)E O (-2.9 - 2.41E O (-1.9 - .9)E O 4( 0/ 24)+ *( 0/ 12)* *( 0/ 12)*
IN-65 ( 36) 30. (-2.62 3. ele -1 23 (5.74 5.5)E -1 ( 5.7 i 5.5)E -1
( 0) (-3.0 - 3.BIE 0 (-2.0 - 3.UE D (-2.0 - 3.9)E O
+1 0' 24)* +( 0/ 12)+ +( DI 12H IF-95 ( 34) 10. ( l.6 $ 3.2)E -1 17 !7.11 4.01E -1 ( 2.3 ; 4.7)E -1 i
( 01 (-3.5 - 2.2)E O (-1.B - 2.2)E D (-2.4 - 3.5)E O
- ( 0/ 24)+ +( 0/ 12)* *( 0/ 12)+
4 EN-RDUTINE REFESS TD THE NU"ER OF SEFAFATE MEASFEMENTS WHICH #ERE GREATEF THAN TEN (10) TIMES THE ArdASE BACkBRDUC FOR THE FERICD OF TPE FEPDFT.
++ THE FRACTIDN CF SAMFLE ANALGES TIELDlWG IETECTAELE MEASUDEMENTS (1.E. )3 STD DEVIATIONS) IS IN31tATED WITH +( le.
3-27
TABLE III-E-1 CONTINUED PELly EEM ATEF (141TS: FCl/K6 IN !CATOR 51AT10h5 STAT 10h WITid HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL STATION 5 eseeses***eneessee seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, seeeeeeeeeeeeeen MEAR MEAN MEAN RAL10 E llDES (NO. ANALYSES) MNBE STA. MNGE PAh5E NO. LETECTEte, N3. NO. LETECTEDie 40. DETECTEDee (h0N-RCUTINE)* LLD
= ____ .- ..._ .
RU-103 ( 361 (-0.2 ! 1.01E -1 17 (-7.2! 1.5)E -1 (-1.2! .21E O
( 0) (-1.8 - .5)E O (-1.3 - .5)E 0 (-2.4 - .1)E O et 0/ 24), *( 0/ 121e et 0/ 12).
RU-106 ( 36) (-1.1 ! 1.1)E O 17 (-2.8f 15.7)E -1 (-2.1 1 2.5)E O
( 06 (-1.5 - 91E 1 (-1.0 - 91E 1 (-1.9 - .9)E 1
- ( 0/ 24), *( 0/ 12)e et Oi 12),
~
1-131 ( 36) ( 4.1 + 3.1)E -1 23 ( 1.1 i .4)E 0 (1.12 .4)E 0
( 0) (-2.1 - 3.9)E O (-1.3 - 3.3)E D (-1.3 - 3.3)E 0 ei 0/ 24)e et 0/ 12ie . et 0/ 12)+
ES-134 ( 36i 15. (-3.6! 1.65E -1 17 (-3.3! 2.5)E-1 (-7.9 1 1.5)E -1
( 0) (-1.6 - 1.1)E 0 (-1.8 - 1.1)E O (-1.5 - 0.0)E O et 0/ 24)+ +( 01 12)+ *( 0/ 12)e E5-137 ( 36) 15. ( 4.0 3 1.P)E -1 11 8 4.1 2 2.3)E -1 (-2.6! 1.5)E -1
( 01 (-1. 3 - 2.0)E O (-1.0 - 2.0)E O (-1.4 - .BtE O e( 0/ 24), +t O! 1214 ef 0/ 12),
N -14', ( 36) 15. (-9.Bt 3.2!E -1 17 (-1.61 3.0)E -1 f-1.2 i .5]E O
( 0) (-4.2 - 1.7)E O (-2.1 - 1.3)E 0 (-5.0 - 1.B)E O si 6/ 24)+ et 0/ 12i+ et 0/12),
CE-141 1 !e) (5.72 3.1)E -1 23 (1.0t .6)E 0 ( 1.0 1 .61E 0
( 01 (-3.6 - 3.11E O (-2.4 - 3.6)E O (-2.4 - 3.6)E O el 0/ 24), et 01 1214 et Of12),
IE-144 ( 36) ( 1.5 t 1.1)E O 11 (1.51 1.4)E O (-6.4 2 12.5)E -1
( 0) (-7.9 - !!.1)E 0 (-5.5 - 11.1)E D (-5.6 - 5.E)E O et 0/ 24), *( 0/ 12)* et 0/ 12),
( 1.7 ! 1.41E D (1.21 9.B)E-1 A2-225 ( 36) (7.93 B.61E -1 11
( 0) (-7. 0 - 12.1)E O (-2.6 - 12.1)E O (-7.6 - 4.7)E O
- ( 0/ 12)* et 0/ 12),
+t 0/ 24)+
ti-3 ( 126 330. (-5.6! 5.4)E 1 23 (-1.4 f 7.3)E 1 (-1.4 1 7.!)E 1 1 0) (-2.0 - 2.2)E 2 (-1. ? - 1.7)E 2 (-1.9 - 1.7)E 2
- ( 0/ 8), *( 0 / 4 14 *( of 4),
+ 160N-RDi. TINE REFE55 TO THE WJM5ER DF SEFAMTE MEASLTEPEkTS WHTEH WERE EGTEF THAli TEN (10) TIMES THE AVERASE H36FDUG FOR THE PER1ED DF TFE REGT.
++ 1PE F9'T10N 0F SAMFLE ANALYSES Y1ELLIN5 DETECTABLE REASUCEMENTS 3-28
III.F.. Shellfish Shellfish are normally sampled quarterly from 5 locations: the Station Discharge Canal, Duxbury Bay, Manomet Point, Plymouth Harbor and Marshfield. The results of the ERMAP program for shellfish are presented in Table III-F-1. It is clear from this table that there have been positive measurements of Be-7, Co-60, AcTh-228 and K-40 in samples from the Discharge Canal. In addition there have been positive measurements of-Be-7, Mn-54 (peak), Co-60, AcTh-228 and K-40 at Manomet Point;~ Be-7,'AcTh-228 and K-40.at Plymouth Harbor; AcTh-228 and K-40 at Duxbury Bay; and, Be-7, AcTh-228 and K-40 at the control :;tation in Marshfield.
The observed. concentrations.of Co-60 and Mn-54 peak are most probably the result:of PNPS-1 liquid releases. However, the observed concentrations of Be-7, AcTh-22R and K-40 are due to the natural occurrencecof these nuclides.
However, even if a persen were to consume the maximum annual quantity of seafood (5 kilograms / year)-with-the highest mean concentrations of Co-60 and Mn-54 (peak), they.would receive a dose of less than 0.001 mrem to the . total body and less than 0.01 arem to the most restrictive organ (Adult, GI-LLI).
When compared to the natural background dose rate of 80-100 mrem / year, there was clearly no significant environmental impact observed in shellfish as a result of the operations of PNPS-1.
3-29
TABLE III F-1 ERMAP RESULTS - SHELLFISH NEE!M: 54ELLF15H UNIT 3: FCIILS WET I Ol[ATDR STATIDNS STATIDN WITH til5 HEST MEAN CONTEDL STATIONS n+uunennun u mum ++*+4 n u e + n+ *+***m uu FAVIO C LILES MEAN MEAN MEAN (ND. AGLYSES) FANEE STA. RANEE EANSE (NDN-RDui!ND + LLD ND. LETECTEtu ND. ND. DETECTEDu E. LETECTEDu BE-7 ( 40) ( 1.B ! .9)E 1 24 ( 3.2 ; .8)E 1 8 3.2 2 .F)E 1
( 0) (-1.6 - 1.3)E 2 (-9.3 - 63.6)E & (-9.3 - 65.6)E O
+( 6/ 32)+ *( 61 Bl+ +' 61 Bi+
r-;) ( 40i ( !.2 ! .1)E 3 15 (1.52 .2)E 3 ( B.4 2 2.21E 2
( 01 ( 9.4 - 272.0iE 1 i 1.2 - 2.1)E 3 ( 1.9 - 14.7)E 2
+i 271 32)* +( 4/ 414 +( El 'B)*
[E-51 40) (-1.2f .9)E 1 24 ( 6.1 2 4.9)E O (6.12 4.9)E O
( 01 (-1.9 - 1.01E 2 (-1.1 - 2.6)E 1 (-1.1 - 2.6!E 1
+( O! 32)+ *( 01 E)* 4( 01 S)*
Mu-34 ( 40) 130. (4.62 10.4)E -1 13 (3.32 2.2)E D (-2.22 5.31E -1
( 01 (-1.T - 1.5)E 1 (-2. 6 - 17.4)E 0 (-1.9 - 2.01E O
+i 01 32). *( Of B)* +( 0! B)*
[0-53 I 40) 130. (-7.32 7.E'E -1 15 ( 6.7 2 6.4}E -1 (-6.62 2.llE -1
( Oi (-1.5 - 7)E 1 i-1.2 - 1.4)E D (-1.4 - .51E O
- i 0/ 32). +1 0/ 41+ +( 0/ Et+
FE-5 4 401 260. '-1.7 : 3.4)E 0 13 i5.9 2 6.E!E O (-5.2 2 6.;)E -1
( 0) (-E.4 - 4.61E 1 (-9.9 - 43.!nE D (-3.2 - 3.2)E O
- ( 9/32)* -+( 0/ Bl+ *( Ol Bl+
EU-6 *- i 40) 130. ( .41 1.5iE O 11 (1.41 .3)E 1 '-4.7 2 7.6)E -1
( 01 (-1.3- 2.4)E 1 ( 4. 0 - 23.01E 0 (-4.E - 1.7]E O
-i t 7/ 32)* *( 6! E)* *( 01 E)*
2N-65 ( 40) 260. 8-1.3 ; 2.4)E O 11 1 2.5 2 51E O ( 2.2 2 1.0)E 0
( 0) (-4.5 - 3.2)E 1 (-2.5 - 3.2)E D (-2.3 - 6.0)E O
- ( 0/32)* *( 0/ Bl+ *( 01 El+
2R'! ( 40) ( 9.2 ! 174.1)E -2 12 ( 2.D ! 3.0)E 0 (-2.31 7.1)E -1
( 0) (-3.0 - 2.2iE 1 (-1. 6 - 2.2)E I (-4.3 - 1.51E O
+( 0132)+ +( 0/ 12)+ +( 0! Ei+
- NDH.D3 TINE EIFEF5 TL THE miEf CF SIFAFATE REAELTIMENT5 WHICH WEFE EFEATEE THAN TEN (10) TIMES THE A'.TF.ME EAEGD' J KL FCD T4 FIFICD [f THE FEFEAT.
++ THE FFAtllCX DF SAMFLE AWALYSE5 YlELIINE 2ETECTA2LE MEA 3UFIMEl.33 (1.E. >3 STL LIVIATIDNS) 15 INDICATED WTiti +i 1*.
3-30
TABLE III-F-1 CONTINUED PE0le: EWEL; FISH UNITS: PCIIr6 WET IN;ICAT0ii STATION 3 STAT!0N WITH HIEHEST MEAN CONTROL STATION 5 net ,eeeeeeeeeeees eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen seeneseseeeeeeee RA 10N.':LILES MEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) RANGE STA.' RANGE EANEE (NCN-F0JTINE). LLD NO. IETECTEDee NO. NO. CETECTEDee ND. DETECTED +e
................... ..= ......... .-
R!}-103 ( 40) 8 1.2 f .9)E 0 13 ( 2.9 ! 2.61E O i-2.9i 5.1)E -1
( 0) (-5.7 - 14.9)E 0 (-5.1 - 14.9)E O (-2.2 - 2.1)E O
- ( Oi 32)+ et 0/ Ble +( Of Ele F3-106 ( 40) (-6.0f 6.BiE 0 11 ( 7.6 ; 29.2)E -1 (-5.2! 2.41E O
( 0) (-6.9 - 10.2iE 1 (-1.3 - 1.21E I (-2.0 - .')E 1 el 0/ 32), +( 0/ 61, et Cl Ele
- -131 i 4h E0. (-l.3 ; 2.9)E O 11 (3.4! 6.2)E 0 (-4.0 2 3.E)E 0
( 01 (-4.9 - 4.7)E 1 (-3.5 - 4.7)E 1 (-2.1 - .8)E 1 et 0/ 32)e +t 0/ 6)* *( 0/ Ele E5-134 ( 40i 50. (-2.7 : 1.0)E O 15 (-1.1 + .6)E 0 (-1.3 i .B)E 0 1 01 (-1.4 - .6)E 1 (-2.4 - .5)E O (-6.3 - .9)E 0
+( 0! 32)+ *i O! 4i+ +1 0/ 6)*
E5-13' ( 40) E0. ( 1.1 ! .9)E 0 12 i 2.3 ! 2.1)E O ( 3.9 ! 5.7!E -1 4 h !-1.1 - 2.ltE 1 8-6.9 - 21.2)E O (-2.4 - 2.2)E O
+i s' 32i+ +( 0/ 12). *( 0/ E).
it.-14) ( 201 t-6.0 1.ilE O 15 (-4.4 ; 17.61E -1 (-3.0 i 1.*)E O
( O! i-3.6 - 1.5)E 1 I-4.9 - 3.01E O (-7.3 - 4.IlE O
+( 0/ *2ie +( (/ Ale *( 0/ S).
EE-141 1 4~-) 4 3.6 2. lie 0 12 ( 5.4 f 4.21E O ( 1.1 1 1.2)E 0
( 0) f-2.3 - 3.7)E 1 (-1.2 - 3.7)E 1 (-2.5 - 7. ele 0
- ( 0/ 3*le +( 0! 12)+ +( 0' 8)e IE-144 i 40) t-2a ! 6.05E 0 !! ( 2.7 1 5.71E 0 (-2.6 2 17.31E-1
( 01 (-1. 6 - .6)E 2 (-2.5 - 3.5)E 1 (-6.1 - 9.2iE O
+1 0/ 32)+ +( 0/ B)+ +( O! 95+
K-225 ( 40) ( 2.7 ! .9)E 1 13 82.E 2.4)E 1 ( 1.4 : 4)E 1 i II (-4.7 - 17.41E 1 (-6.2 - 174.0if 0 ( s.B - 301.(IE -1
+( B/ 32)* +( 3/ Bl+ +( At S)e
- NON-RCtIT!hE FEFEF5 70 THE NUf'II; UF SEP3 ATE t'EA3UFINENTS WH!tH WEEE GREATED THAN TEN (10) TIMES THE AVEFA5E I4D3FOUND ECR THE FE5133 UT THE FEPCFT.
- inE FRACTIDE OF SMLE ANALY3E5 YlELDINS IETitTAELE REASUFEMENT5 (1.E. >3 STD IEVIATIDN3) 15 INDlIATED WITH e( )*.
3-31
III.G. Alaae (Irish Moss)
Algae, referred to as Irish Moss or Chondrus Chrispus, is sangled quarterly at three locations, the PNPS Discharge Canal, Manomet Point and E111sville. The results of the ERMAP program for Algae are presented in Table III-G-1.
It is clear from this table that there have been positive measurements
. of Be-7, Co-58, C0-60 AcTh-228 and K-40 at the Discharge Canal. In
. addition, there have been positive measurements of Be-7, Co-60 (peak),
'AcTh-228 and K-40 at Manomet Point (Station 15 - 3 miles - SE); and Be-7, AcTh-228 and K-40 at the control station of Ellisv111e (Station
.22 .8 mi - SSE) .
The measured concentrations of Co-58 and'Co-60 at the Discharge Canal
- are certainly due to liquid effluents from PNPS-1. The observed
. concentration of Co-60 (peak) at Manomet-Point is most probably the result of PNPS-1 liquid releases. 'There were 1no positive measurements of reactor related isotopes at the control station in.E111sv111e,
- approximately eightleiles away.
It is hoortant to note that due to processing and market dilution, the presence of the Co-58 and Co-60 concentrations do not' represent a significant potential source of dose to the general public. In fact, even direct human consunption of Algae (which to our knowledge, does 3-32
not occur) with the highest mean concentrations would result in a dose rate of about 0.002 mrem /yr to the total body and less than 0.02 mrem /yr to'the most sensitive organ ( Adult-GI-LLI, using the models presented in Regulatory Guide 1.109) and assuming consumption of 5 kg/ year of unprocessed material. When compared with the natural background dose rate of 80-100 mrem /yr, there was clearly no i significant environmental impact observed in Algae as a result of:the operation of PNPS-1.
l 3-33 f
- , - - , , , - - - . . -- , - - - , .,,- , , , . - ,- . , . --,.--.-.--w .:-,, , e
r TABLE III-G-1 ERMAP RESULTS - ALGAE ME01'J9: IRISF K033 UNITS: FC1/tG NET INDICATOR STAi!CNS STAT!DN WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTFDL STATICHS seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee senesee*eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, eeeeeeeeeeeeee**
FADICYJCLIDES MEAN PEAN MEAN (ND. ANAL)iES) FAhSE STA. RAN5E FANGE (NON-F00 TINE). LLD N?. LETECTEDee NO. NO LETECTEtte NO. DETECTEDe*
............... .. ............=--_ . ........= ...
GE-7 ( 12) ( 1.3 i .11E 2 22 ( 1.9 i .6)E 2 (1.9i .6tE 2
( 0) ( 5.6 - 17.0)E I ( 7.6 - 36.3)E 1 ( 7.6 - 36.3)E 1 et 5/ 6)* el 3! 4), et 3/ 4)*
r-40 ( 12) 5.5! .5:E 3 11 ( 6.4 ! .2)E 3 ( 5.0 t .7)E 3
( 0) ! 4.3 - E.7)E 3 ( 4.9 - 8.7)E 3 ( 3.1 - 6.01E 3
- ( BI 8)+ et 4/ 4). *( 4f 416 CR-51 ( 12) (-4.2 ! 3.B'E 1 11 (-4.8 ! 225.3)E -1 (-2.2 t 18.2)E 0
( 0) (-2.5 - .7)E 2 (-4.5 - 5.91E 1 (-3.4 - 3.4)E 1 el 0/ Ble et 0/ Ale *( 0/ 41 NN-54 ( 121 130. ( 3.4 ! 10.4)E -1 11 (6.41 15.9)E -1 (1.4! 15.7)E -1
( 0) (-4.2 - 3.7)E 0 (-2.7 - 3.7)E O (-2.9 - 4.1)E O 4( 0/ E), *( 0/ 4)* *( 0/ 4).
CD-SS ( 12) 130. i 4.4 ! 3.6lE O 22 I 7.1 ! 2.5)E 0 (7.11 2.5)E O
( 1) (-9.2 - 19.8)E O ( 2.3 - 13.4)E O ( 2.3 - 13.4)E O
- t 11 B), of 0/ 4)+ *( 0/ 4)+
FE-59 ( 12) 260. (7.5! 5.6)E O 15 (1.21 1.1)E 1 (9.21 7.91E 0
( 0) (-B.3 - 41.6)E 0 (-4.8 - 42.8)E 0 (- 1. 0 - 2.6)E 1
- ( 0/ B). *( Oi 4), *( 0/ 4).
E0-6's ( 12) 130. ( 2.2 2 .9)E I 11 ( 3.3 t 1.4)E 1 (3.21 2.3)E O
( 2! (-4.1 - 72.5)E O ( 6.6 - 72.5)E O (-2.6 - B.4)E O
- ( 2/ Ble et 2/ 4)e 4( 0/ 41*
2N-65 ( 121 260. ( 5.B ! 85.7)E -1 11 ( 1.2 1 1.2)E 1 ( 7.0 t 7.01E O
( 0) (-3.0 - 4.6)E 1 I-3.9 - 45.6)E O (-9.0 - 24.0)E O ,
- ( 0/ B)* *( 01 4)* *f 0/ 4)*
2F -95 ( 12) (2.3! 16.5)E -1 11 ( !.6 ! 2.2)E O (-3. 3 1 4.5)E O 4 0) (-6.9 - 5.9)E O (-4. 6 - 5.0)E O (-1.2 - .5)E 1 et 0/ Bl* *( 01 4), *( 0/ 4)*
!
- NDN-ROUT!hE REFERS TD THE NUMBER OF SEFAFATE MEASUREMENTS WHICH WERE BREATE9 l THAN TEN (los TIMES THE AVERA3E IAttSROUND FOR THE FERIOD LF THE FEFDRT.
l ** THE FRAti13N OF SA9FLE ANALYSES YIELDING IETECTABLE MEA 5'JFIMEWIS (1.E. >3 STD LEVIAilCN31 15 INDICATED N!TH *( le.
i i
3-34 t
TABLE III-G-1 CONT 1NUED MEDI2: IF15Hst053 UNITS: FCI/r5 BET INDICATOR STAT!CNS STATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL STATIONS setesteteneestsee, eeneetetenesesesseeses**6 stenessessantest FA310ECLIDES PEAN MEAN MEAN (ND. ANALYSES) RANGE ETA. FAkSE FANGE (NDN-R3' J TINE)
- LLD N3. LETECTEDee N3. NO. DETECTED ** NO. DETECTEDet
........ . .............. . .. ........... .-- ..=-
RJ-103 ( 12) (-6.9 23.7)E -1 15 ( 1.5 t 4.6)E O (-6.2! 2.4;E 0
. ( 0) (-9.2 - 12.91E 0 (-9.2 - 12.9)E O (-1.1 - .1)E 1
} *( 0/ 6)+ et 0/ 4)e et 0/ Als sJ 1.3)E 1 2.7)E 1 EU-106 ( 121 ( 9.7 ! 13.9)E 0 11 ( 1.6 ! ( 1.5 t
( 0) (-5.6 - 6.4)E 1 (-6.7 - 50.6)E 0 (-4.E - 6.6)E I 41 0/ 6)e *( 0/ 4)e et 0/ 4)*
l-131 ( 121 80. t-6.5 ! E1.2)E -1 11 ( 1.1 ! 1.01E 1 (6.0t 3.7)E O
( 0) (-4.5 - 2.4)E 1 (-1. B - 2.4)E 1 ( 3.3 - 18.9)E 0
- ! 0/ 8)4 *( O! 4)* of 0/ 416 ES-134 ( 121 80. (-3.0t I.0)E O !! l-2.1! 4.2)E 0 (-4.72 4.8)E 0
( 0) (-1.4 - 4)E 1 (-1.4 - .4)E 1 (-1.3 - .8)E 1 4( 0/ E)+ et 0/ 4)* et 0/ 414 C5-137 ( 12) 60. i 1.3 t 2.1)E O 15 t 4.7 ! 3.3)E O (!.B! 4e.7)E -1
( 0) (-5.2 - 11.1)E O (-4.0 - 11.1)E O (-1.3 - .81E 1 4( 0/ B)* *( Oi 4)* *( Ol 4)+
H-140 ( 12) (-6.2! 3.0)E O 11 f-3.52 2.4)E O (-4.9! 3.0)E O
( 0) (-2.3 - .4)E 1 (-9.1 - 1.3)E O (-1.1 - .3)E 1
- ( 01 El+ +( 0/ 41 +t 0/ 4)*
IE-141 ( 121 (5.0t 20.3)E -1 22 ( 6.9 2 2.0)E 0 ( 6.9 1 2.0)E O
( 0) (-6.1 - 11.0)E 0 ( 3.4 - 12.0)E O ( 3.4 - 12.01E 0
- t 0/ B)* 4t Of 4)* 4( 0/ 4)+
EE-144 ( 12) (-2.9 ! 9.9)E O 11 (1.52 1.11E 1 (-B.6 2 15.21E O
( 06 (-5.4 - 3.61E 1 (-1.3 - 3.6)E 1 (-5.4 - 1.0!E 1 41 0/ B)* 4( 0/ Ali *( 0/ 4)*
AE-22B ( 12) ( 2.5 t 1.2)E 1 22 (5.52 1.9)E 1 ( 5.5 2 1.9)E 1
( 0) (-2.6 - 7.4)E 1 ( 2.1 - 9.5)E 1 ( 2.1 - 9.51E 1 41 2/ E)* *( 1/ Alt il 1/ 4)+
4 WDN-RDUTlWE FEFEFS TD TE NUMBER OF SEFARATE MEASL91MENTS WIEH WE9I EAEATED THAN TEN (10) TIMES THE AVEFASE BAtr5ROUND FDR THE FERIDie Dr THE REFDRT.
+e THE FRACTION DF SAMPLE ANALYSE 5 YIElf!NG DETEETABLE MEASUREMENTS (I.E. )3 STD IIVIATICN5) 15 IN21!ATED WITH 4( 14 3-35
III.H. Lobster ( ArthroDods)
Lobster samples are collected four times per season in the vicinity of the Discharge Canal Outfall area and annually at a distant point offshore. Only one of the required samples from the Discharge Canal Outfall area was not obtained due to unavailability in the first quarter of the year. The results of the ERMAP program for lobsters are presented in Table III-H-1. These results are unremarkable in that there were no positive measurements of any isotopes other than K-40 in either the indicator or the control samples (K-40 is a naturally occurring isotope). Therefore, there is no evidence of any environmental impact'on this media as a result of the operation 'of PNPS-1.
3-36
TABLE III-H-1 ERMAP RESULTS - LOBSTER MEC1tM: LC557ER UNITE: PC1/t6 WET INDICA 105 STAT 1045 STAi10N WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTFDL STATIONS eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, esee*++,eeeeeeen FALI0hUCL1 DES PEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) FANSE STA. PANEE PANGE (NON-RDUT!NEle LLD NO. LETECTEte* NO. NO. DETECTELes O. DETECTEDee BE-7 ( 4) (-S.62 2.7)E 1 12 (-5.92 7.5)E 1 (-5.92 7.5)E 1
( 0) (-l.1 - 0.0)E 2 el 0/ 3)* 4( O! 19 *( 01 1)*
L-40 ( 41 ( 2.1 ! .11E 3 11 (2.1! .1)E 3 (1.91 .2)E 3
( 0) ( 1.9 - 2.4)E 3 ( 1.9 - 2.4)E 3
- ( 3/ 3)e et 3/ 31, *( 1/ 1).
CF-51 ( 4) (-2.5! 4.6tE 1 12 ( 1.0 t .9)E 2 (!.0t .9)E 2
( c) (-1.2 - .3)E 2 et 0/ 3)* *( 0/ 11e *( 0/ lie MN-54 ( 4i 130. (-5.81 76.4}E -1 11 (-5.2 2 76.4)E -1 (-3.0 f 9.0)E O
( 0) (-1.1 - 1.4)E 1 (-1.1 - 1.4)E 1
- ( Ot 3)+ *( O! 31* *! Oi lie CD-55 ( 4) 130. ( 1.1 1 7.31E 0 11 ( 1.1 1 7.31E O ( 2.9 i 91.0)E -1
( 0) H.1 - 1.!)E 1 (-1.1 - 1.5)E 1 et 01 3)* 4( CI 3le 4( 01 11+
FE-59 ( 41 260. t 2.2 i .31E 1 11 (2.2i .31E 1 (-1.2 t 2.2)E 1
( 0) ( 1.7 - 2.61E 1 8 1.7 - 2.6)E 1
- ( 0/ 3H +8 Of 39 ef Of 1)*
CG e0 ( 41 130. ( l.1 ! .6)E 1 11 (1.12 .6)E 1 (5.11 11.BIE O
( Os ( 3.5 - 126.0)E -1 ( 3.5 - 226.01E -1 et 0/ 3)* *( 0/ 3). et 0/ 19 IN-65 ( 4) .3)E 1 (2.12 .31E 1 (-1.32 15.51E O 260. ' 2.1 : 11
( 0) ( 1.6 - 2.71E 1 i 1.6 - 2.7)E 1
- ( 0/ 3)+ *( 0/ 3). *( 0/ lie IF-95 ( 4) (-6.01 14.9)E 0 12 ( 4.9 1 155.0)E -1 ( 9.3 2 155.0)E -1
( 0) (-3.5 - 1.4)E 1 e' 0/ 3)* *( 0/ 1), et 0/ lie
- IlON-FDU11WE REFERS TO THE NUMIER 0F SEFAMATE HEASUPEMEN15 WHICH WEFE GREATER I
THAN TEN (10) 11MES TFE A'/EEASE E42fEFDJND Ft5 THE FERIOD OF THE FIF0FT.
++ TE FPACT10E DF SAMfLE nALYSES VIELDING LETECT&BLE MEASUREMENTS (1.E. >! STD IE.'1A110k3; 15 INDICATED lititi *( le.
1 1
3-37
TABLE III-H-1 CONTINUED RE!!'2: D55TER UNIT 5: FCl/tB WET INDICATOR STATICNS STATION W!iH HIGHEST MEAN CONTRCL STATIONS
+eeeeeeeeeeese**** es**** eses 4*eeeeeeeees*** eeeeeeeeeeeeeeen EADIDEttlirES liEAN MEAN MEAN (ND. ANALYSE 51 FANGE STA. RANGE FANGE (M3N-EDUTIhEle LLD NO. IETECTEIe* NO. hD. DETECTEI4e NO. DETECTED *e RU-103 ( 4) ( 3.3 1 3.61E O 11 (3.32 3.61E 0 (-6.0t 9.5)E 0
( Of (-2.0 - 10.3)E O (-2.0 - 10.3)E O
+t 01 314 et 0/ 3)+ et 0! !)*
Re-l'd.t Al i-1.5 ! 10,5)E 1 12 I 7.E ! 67.4)E 0 ( 7.8 ! 67.41E O
( Of '-2.5 - .5)E 2
- { 0/ 3)+ 4( 0/ 11+ *( 0/ 1),
1-131 ( 4) E0. (1.i! 42.6)E O 11 ( 1.3 f 42.61E O (-3.2 ! 4.1)E 1
( 01 (-7.3 - 7.4)E 1 (-7.3 - 7.4)E 1
+( 0/ 114 +( 0/ 3i+ *( 0/ lie ES-134 ( 41 90. (-1,3 ! 1.1)E 1 12 (-5.6 3 9.9)E 0 (-5.6f 8.5)E D
( 01 (-3.4 - .1)E 1
-+( 0/ 3)* +f 01 11+ *( 0/ 1).
ES ( 41 20. (-7.7 ! 11.E1E O 12 (1.21 .9)E 1 (1.21 .6)E 1
( 0 (-2.0 - 1.61E 1 41 D/ 314 *( O! 11e +t Oi 1).
M-140 t 4) I-5.0 t 9.1)E O 12 ( 1.3 1 2.2)E 1 (1.3! :.2)E 1
( 01 (-1.5 - 1.35E 1
+( 01 3t+ *( 0/ 1)* +( 0/ 1)*
IE-141 i Al ( B.7 ! 12.7)E O 12 (2.21 1.6)E 1 (2.21 1.6)E 1
( 0) (-1.7 - 2.2)E 1 4( 0/ 314 +I Of 114 *( 01 !).
IE-144 r 4) ( 1.g 3 1.clE 1 12 (3.B3 4.9)E 1 4 3.E ! 4.9)E 1 1 0) (-1.1 - 5.3)E 1
- ( 01 314 *( 0/ 1)+ *( 0/ lie AI a6 ( 4) (-2.1 + 1.BiE i 11 (-2.1 1 1.B)E 1 (-3.3 2 3.9)E 1
( 0) (-5.3 - .61E 1 (-5.3 - . Elf 1 4( O! 3)* 4( 01 314 *( 0/ 11+
i 4 OW-RDUTINE REFEE3 TD llE NUMBER OF SEFAFATE tIEASU2EMENT5 F.il!M EllE 6;EATEE 14 TEN (10) TItIES THE AVERAGE Eti:5EDL'WD FDE THE FERIOL DF TE EEFORT.
++ THE TEAtilDN IF SAf!FLE A4ALYSE3 VIELIINE DETEETABLE fEASUFETNTS i (1.E. )3 Si! DEVIATIDN3) JS IC1tATED Wliti 4( le.
3-38
III.I. Fish Fish samples of Bottom Oriented (Group I) and Near Bottom (Group II) species are collected quarterly in the vicinity of the Discharge Canal Outfall. In addition, samples of Anadromous (Group III) and Coastal Migratory (Group IV) species are collected when in season, in this same area. Lastly, a sample from each group is collected once per year at a distant location offshore. During 1983, one Group I sample was unavailable in the third quarter, and two Group II samples were unavailable in the first quarter.
The result of the ERMAP program of fish are. presented in Table 111-I-1. ~There was a positive measurement of Es-137 at the indicator station (Discharge Canal - Station 11) during the fourth quarter.
A winter flounder sample collected on 11/17/83 at the Discharge Canal outfall Area indicated a positive measurement.cf Cs-137. The winter flounder is in the Group I . category (Botton.Driented). Even if an individual.were to consume the nazimum annual quantity of fish (21 kilograms / year) with .the highest mean concentration of Es-137, .they would receive a dose of less than 0.06 uren to the total body and about D.08 area to the most restrictive organ ( Adult - Liver). Therefore, there is little evidence of any environmental inpact on this media as a result of the operation of PNPS-1.
3-39
TABLE III-I-1 ERMAP RESULTS - FISH MEHJf.: FIVI5-( UNITS: PCI/F6 NET INDICATCR STATION 3 STATION WITH HIGkEST MEAN CONTFDL STAT!DNS msmmmsms mmmsmmmesem + m m m m +ss FADIONU:LIDES MEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) EAW3E STA. RAN3E PANGE (NON-503 TINE)* LLD N3. CETECTEL** NO. NC. LETECTEtte NO. DETECTEt**
Bi-7 ( 31) (-4.1 ! 14.9)E o 19 ( 9.9 2 7.7)E 1 (-4.02 2.0)E 1
( 0) (-1.6 - 1.3)E 2 (-9.8- 2.4)E 1
- ( 0/ 25)+ *( Of 1)* +( 0/ 6)+
t-40 ( 31) ( 3.2 i .1)E 3 19 ( 4.5 ! .3)E 3 (3.22 .2)E 3
( 0) ( 2.6 - 4.5)E 3 ( 2.5 - 3.9)E 3
+t 25/ 25)+ *( li 1)* *( 6/ 6)+
CE-51 ( 31) (35 t 14.0)E O 90 41.22 .6)E 2 (!.Bi 2.61E 1
( 0) (-1.3 - 1.3)E 2 (-3.0 - II.7)E 1
- ( 01 25)+ *( 01 11+ *( 01 6)*
MN-34 ( 31) 130. (-1.8 ! 1.41E O 22 ( B.1 2 6.8)E O (!.21 2.6)E O
-( 0) (-1.2 - 1.9)E 1 (-1.1 - .B)E 1
- ( 0/ 25)+ *( 01 1)* *( 01 61+
EC-5B ( 31) 130. t 4.1 f 16.71E -1 50 (5.2t 5.2)E D t-1.0t !.SIE O
( 0) I-1.1 - 2.2)E 1 (-6.6 - 5.2)E 6
- ( 0/ 25)* +( 0/ 1)* *( 0/ 6)*
FE-59 ( 31) 260. (4.3! 3.5)E 0 11 ( 5.6 3.8)E C (-4.5 2 6.5)E O
( 0) (-3.3 - J.2)E 1 6-3.3 - 4.2)E 1 (-3.2 - 1.5)E 1 41 0/ 2514 +t 0122H *( 0/ 61+
CD-63 ( 31) 130. I 2.4 2 17.1)E -l 19 ( E.0 f 13.0)E 0 t-2.52 5.6)E 0
( 0) (-1.7 - 1.9)E 1 (-2.3 - 2.0)E 1
+I 0/ 25:4 *( 01 !)+ *( 0/ 6)*
2N-65 ( 31) 260. (-4.5 ; 4.1)E 0 00 (l.32 1.7)E 1 (2.61 7.2)E O
( 0) (-!. ! - 4.2)E 1 (-4.6 - 30.0)E 6 (-1.9 - 3.0}E 1
+( 0/ 25)* *( 0/ 2)* *( 0/ 6)+
2R *5 ( 31) ( l.6 ; 2.9)E 0 11 ( 2.0 f 1.8)E 1 (4.22 7.01E O
( 0) f-3.6 - 2.3)E 1 (-2.5 - 2.7)E 1
- ( 0/ 25)* *( 0/ 1)+ 4( 01 65 +
4 NON-RDUTINE FETERE T3 THE NUMEER DF SEPARATE t'EA5UREMENTS NHitH NEFE EFEATEP THAN TEN (10) TifES THE AVERAGE ICBFDUQ F06 THE FERIOD OF THE FEFDRT.
++ THE EFACTION CF SANFLE ANALYSE 3 YIELCIN3 IETEITABLE PS33REMENTS (1.E. 33 STD DEVIAi!DNS) 15 IGitATED N!Tti +f 14 3-40
TABLE 111-1-1 CONTINUED nELitriFIM*!b UNITS: Fct/r6 liET INDICATOR STATIONS STATICN WITh HIGHEST MEAN ECNTROL STATIONS unnuunnun unnunnennenuou suunintuue FAD 10%'CLitES MEAN MEAN MEAN LNO. ANALYSES) FANGE STA. RANGE RANGE (NON-ROUTINE)* LLD NO. LETECTED u N3. N3. DETECTED ** NO. DETECTED **
liU-103 ( 31) ( 3.0 2 1.2)E O 19 (7.3! 10.6)E O (-8.8t 5.9)E 0
( 0) (-7.2 - 16.9)E 0 (-3.1 - .5)E 1
- ( 0/ 25)* *( 0/ 1)* *( 0/ 6)*
E'J-106 ( 31) ( 1.1 1 19.0)E 0 90 (l.6! .8)E 2 (1.72 4.7)E I
( 0) (-2.2 - 1.7)E 2 (-1.2 - 1.6)E 2
- ( 0/ 25)* *( 0/ 1)* *( 0/ 6)*
1-131 ( 31) 80. ( 4.5 ! 5.5)E 0 22 ( 5.5 t 3.9)E i (-7.5t 20.9)E 0
( 0) (-3.2 - 11.7)E 1 (-9. 9 - 5.8)E 1
- ( 0/25)+ *( 0/ 1)* *( 0/ 6)+
.ES-134 ( 31) 80. (-0.4! 14.9)E -1 12 ( 4.5 1 2.3)E -1 (-2.9 ! 2.6)E O
( 0) (-1.9 - 1.0IE I ( 2.2 - 6.8)E -1 (-1.0 - 1.0)E I
- ( 0/25)* *( 0/ 2)* *( 0/ 6)+
ES-137 ( 31) 80. ( 6.2 t 1.6)E O 29 ( !.5 ! .9)E 1 (6.42 3.3)E 0
( 1) (-5.2 - 33.9)E O (-6.0 - 15.0!E O
- ( 1/ 25)* +( 0/ 1)* *( 0/ 6)*
IG-14) ( 316 (-3.02 4.6)E O 19 (5.0t 30.0)E O (-2.5 t 1.5)E I
( 0) (-6.5 - 6.2)E 1 (-1.0 - .0)E 2
- ( 0/25)+ +( O! II* *( 0/ 6)+
EE-141 ( 31) (2.41 3.3)E O 19 ( 3.3 ! 1.5)E 1 ( 7.1 ! 3.9)E O
( 0) (-2.7 - 3.71E 1 (-4. 8 - 19.6)E O
- ( 9/ 3)+ -+t 0/ 116 *( 0/ 6)*
CE-144 ( 31) (-5.0 t 682.1)E -2 90 (B.0! 4.7)E 1 ( 9.4 ! 27.9)E O
( 0) (-9.6 - 5.3)E 1 (-1.1 - .BiE 2
- ( 0/ Zi+ *( 0/ 11* *( 0/ 6)+
At-229 ( 31) (-4.2 5.8)E O 29 (5.5f 3.3)E 1 ( 2.7 t 19.2)E O
( 0) (-6.7 - 6.0)E 1 (-7.5 - 5.5)E 1
- ( 0/ 25)* +( 0/ 1)* *l 0/ 614
-+ NON-1lDUllNE FEFERS TO T)E NMER OF SEFARATE MEASUPINENTS WHitN WERE SFEATER THAN TEN (10) TIMES THE AVEGAEE EAtr6403ND TDR THE FER103 0F Tif REPDET.
- 1HE FFACTION 08 SAMPLE ANALV!ES VIELDINE DETECTAELE NEASUREMENTS (1.E.13 STD DEVIATIONS) IS INDICATED WITH *l l+.
3-41
4 III..). Sediments Sediment samples are taken semi-annually at five indicator stations including Rocky Point, Plymouth Harbor Duxbury Bay, Plymouth Beach and Manomet Point and a control sample is taken f rom Marshfield. There is a detailed subdivision of individual sample cores in which samples are sectioned into'2 cm increments during the first half of the year (this
' applies to all locations except Plymouth Beach), and samples are
. sectioned into'S cm increments during the second half of the year.
i e
The surface and alternate sections are analyzed for'ganum emitting isotopes. In addition,'the surface section from each core and a mid-depth section from:Socky Point and Plymna.th Harbor are analyzed for Pu-238.and Pu-239.:240.
The results of .the ERMAP program for sediments are presented in Table j .III-J-1. It is clear from this table that Es-137 was observed in a sediment sample (16-18:cm) taken from Duxbury Bay (Station 13). This sangle. ass collected on'5/31/83. In addition. Es-137 ans observed in
.the majority of .the sedient segments (D-26 cm) obtained from Duxbury Bay on '5/31/83, and was : observed in all of the sediment segments (0-15 cm) collected on 10/13/83. The observation of Cs-137 aas also made at
' Rocky Point (28-30 cm, collected on 5/31/83), Menomet Point (20-22 cm, collected on 5/31/83), Plymouth Harbor (0-18 cm, collected on 3-42 l_--________ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _
- 5/16/83; 0-15 cm, collected on 10/11/83), and at Marshfield (4-22 cm, collected on 5/2/83; 0-15 cm, collected on 10/13/83). The concentration of Cs-137 at the 28-30 cm level from Rocky Point was most
. likely due to controlled liquid releases from PNPS-1. The concentrations of Cs-137 at Duxbury Bay may be explained by the fact that the sediment samples have a silty character not common to the other samples. The Plymouth Harbor sediment is very similar to Duxbury l 8ay. It may be that the nature of the Duxbury sediment is such.that i
I certain materials are retained more strongly than others. This theory is supported'by the fact that the Duxbury station also had the highest mean concentration of K-40, an isotope which is chemically similar to Cs-137. The measured concentration of Be-7, and to some4 extent Es-137 l at Duxbury Bay, Piymouth Harbor and Marshfield, and the ts-137 at l
Manomet Point. are attributable to the fission products related to fallout f rom previous weapons testing.
i
- Analyses for plutonium isotopes in sediment : samples were .perfomed -by the EAL Corporation (formally LFE Environmental Analyses. Laboratories)
! in Richmond, California. The results of these analyses are presented in Table III-J-2. There is no apparent trend in these data to indicate i
that the PNPS-1 is contributing measurably to levels of Pu-238 or 239, 240 in the environment since levels of plutonium at Rocky Point are among the lowest measured at any location.
l f
3-43 1
1
~_.._.__.._-..,.._.__,,.,___,-_,_,,m__ , ,-w--a -- - - * * - * --7-*v- - - - - - - ' + * - - - - - - - ~ + - ' - * * - - - * '
TABLE III-J-1 ERMAP RESULTS - SEDIMENT MEL:tM: SE0! PENT UNITS: PCl/r6 DRf INDICATOR STAil0NS STATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTFDL LOCATION eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese seeeeeeeeeeeeees SADIDNdCLIDES MEAN MEAN MEAN 140. ANALYSES) FANGE STA. RANSE RANGE (NCN-ROUTINE), LLD N?. LETECTEtet NO. NO. DETECTEDet NO. LETECTEDee BE-7 I 60) (3.32 1.5)E 1 24 (l.41 1.1)E 2 (l.4! 1.1)E 2
( 0) (-1.1 - 4.4)E 2 (-1.1 - 12.5)E 2 (-1.1 - 12.5)E 2 et 2/ 49te *( 2/ !!)* e( 2/ li)e F-40 ( 60) (9.9! .3)E 3 13 ( 1.3 i .llE 4 ( l.1 ! .0)E 4
( 0) ( 6.5 - 15.3)E 3 ( 9.7 - 15.')E 3 ( 9.4 - 12.2)E 3 et 49/ 49)e *( 11/ lile *( 11/ Ille En-51 ( 60) (-l.6 1.9)E 1 12 (1.6! 3.4)E 1 (-1.2 e 3.7)E I
( 0) (-3.7 - 2.4)E 2 (-1.2 - 2.4)E 2 (-2.1 - 1.4)E 2 4( 0/ 49), et 0/ 111e *( 0/ lile MN-54 ( 60) 60. (-9.6t 12.9)E -1 14 (2.7t' 3. Bit 0 (-6.0 1 3.2)E 0
( 01 (-2.4 - 2.0)E i (-1.3 - 1.5)E 1 (-1.9 - 2.2iE 1 4( 0/ 49)* et 0/ 6)e +t 0/ !!)*
ED-33 ( 6*.) 60. (-2.9 2 1.3)E 0 14 (-2.9 2 25.7)E -1 (-2.5 2 3.7)E O
( 0) (-2.4 - 1.8)E 1 (-7.7 - 9. lie O (-2.'.- 1.3)E 1 4( 0/ 49)4 el 0/ 6). -
- ( 01 11)e FE-58 i 60) 120. (-5.0 f 3.9)E O 24 ( 9.2 : 10.61E O ( i.2 : 10.6)E O i
! 01 (-6.9 - 5.7)E 1 (-3.7 - 7.4)E 1 (-3.7- 7.4)E 1 l 41 01 4M+ et 0/ 11)e *( 0/ 11)+
[0-60 ( 601 Sh ( 1.2 : 1.JiE C 11 43.92 3.3)E 0 (-5.12 2.1)E O I
( 0) (-1.5 - 2.7)E 1 (-1.2 - 2.7)E 1 (-2.6 - .91E 1 l 41 0/49)+ et 0/ 111e 4( 01 !!)*
2N-65 ( 60) 50. '-1.4 ! 3.2)E C 13 (2.22 6.5)E O (-2.3! B. ele O
( 01 (-4.9 - 6.2)E I (-3.6 - 2.9)E 1 (-4.4 - 4.B)E 1
, it 0/ 49)* *( 0/ 11)e *( 0/11)*
2E-95 ( 60) 50. (7.52 2.7)E 0 24 (l.9i .5)E 1 ( l.9 ! .5)E 1 l t 01 (-2. 2 - 5.9)E I (-4.2 - 54.3)E o (-4.2 - 54.3)E 0 I 41 O! 49)+ et 0/ lile *( 01 11)*
1 i
- NDR-RDU11E REFEES TD THE NLMEE DF SEFARATE MEASUEEMEhTS WHICH NERE SPEATEF !
THAN TEN (101 TIES THE AVERAGE 3AEGOUC FOR THE FERIDD OF THE REFDRT.
+e THE FFACTIDW DF SAMFLE ANALYSES Y1ELDI#6 CETEITABLE MEASUfEENTS l (1.E.13 ST3 IEVIAT10NS) 15 IllDitATED WITH *( le.
3-44
\
TABLE III-J-1 CONTINUED met!!m set! MENT UNITS: FCitr6 DGY ICICAICF STATIONS STATION NITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTFDL LOCAi!0N u* m u m ***u unu m m+nuumu s mnemuum FACIDwCLISES MEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) RANGE STA. FAN 3E RAN5E (NON-F.0UTINE)* LLD N3. DETECTED ** NU. N3. DETECTED +5 NO. DETECTEt**
RU-103 ( 60) (-2.9 t 1.71E 0 15 (-1.31 3.9)E O (-3.21 4.1)E 0
( 0) (-3.2 - 2.1)E 1 (-2.3 - 1.61E 1 (-2.6 - . 4)E 1
- ( 0/ 49)* *( 0/ 10)+ *( 0/ 11)*
RU-106 ( 60) ( 3.B ! 10.1)E 0 13 (3.92 2.0)E 1 (-1.9 t 2.4tE 1
( 0) (-2.1 - 1.4)E 2 (-9. 6 - 13.7)E 1 (-1.4 - .9)E 2
- ( 0/ 49)* *( 0/ !!)* *( 0/ 11)*
i 1-1!1 ( 60) (-2.0 ! 4.0)E 1 !! (1.12 1.01E 2 (5.1! 48.01E O
( On (-1.3 - 1.1)E 3 (-1.5 - 11.3)E 2 (-2.1 - 3.4)E 2
- ( 0/ 49t* *( C/ !!!* *( OI !!)*
CS-134 ( 601 50. (-3.6! 1.2)E O 11 (1.31 1.9)E 0 (-3.71 2.91E 0
( 0) (-2.1 - 1.7)E 1 (-1.1 - 1.01E 1 (-1.5 - 1.3)E 1
- ( 0/ 49)* *( 0/ Ille *( 0/ 11)*
CS-137 ( 60) 50. ( 2.4 ! .4)E 1 13 ( 5.6 ! .9)E 1 ( 2.8 ! .51E 1
( Of t-2.7 - 100.0if 0 ( 1.B - 10.0)E 1 ( 5.5 - 6').11E 0
- ( 19/ 49)* *( 9I 11)* *( 9/ 11)*
BA-14t, ( 60) (-B.3 ! 5.0)E 1 14 (-1.71 1.6)E 1 f-7.6 : 1.5)E 1
( 0) (-2.4 - .1)E 3 (-5.6- 5.41E 1 (-1. 6 - 0.0lE 2
- ( 0/ 49)* *( 0/ 614 *( 0/ 11)*
CE-141 ( 60) (9.3! 3.11E 0 15 (2.11 .5)E 1 ( 1.5 t .71E 1
( 06 (-B.6 - 4.9)E 1 (-7.5 - 38.31E O (-3.3 - 4.2)E 1
- ( 0/ 4?)* *( 0/ 10)* *( 0/ 11t*
CE-144 ( 601 150. (-1.8 ! .6)E 1 13 (-9.3 2 20.5)E O (-3.0 t .6)E I
( 0) (-1.0 - 1.21E 2 (-1. 0 - 1.2)E 2 (-6.9 - 1.51E 1
+1 01 48)* *( 0/ 1114 4( 0/ 11)*
A:-: i ( 60) ( 3.5 ! .2)E 2 13 (5.5t .5)E : ( 3.7 ! .2)E 2
( On ( 1.5 - B.2)E 2 ( 3.2 - B.2)E : ( 2.9 - 4.55E 2
- ( 41/ 49)* *( 11/ 11)* *( 11/ 11)*
- NON-RDUTilE REFEFS 10 TE NUF.BEF DF SEFMATE MEASUREMENTS #HIIH GE BFIATIP THAN TEN (10) TIFES THE AVERABE EAIGDUG FCS THE FERICI DF THE PIPDFT.
3-45
TABLE III-J-2 RESULTS OF SEDIMENT ANALYSES FOR PLUTONIUM Location Depth (cm) Results -
DCi/KQ (drV) +- % Error (1#) (a) 238 239,240 Pu Pu Duxbury 0-2 1.23+-22% 25.B+-5%
Plymouth Harbor 0-2 0.48+-30% 7.67e7%
Plymouth Harbor .
16-18 0.053+-300% 5.194-11%
Rocky Point 0-2 0.096+-133% 3.99+-9%
Rocky Point 12-14 0.11 +-70% 2.5 84 -9 %
Manonet Point 0-2 .0.17+-80% 2.60+-12%
Marshfield-Control 0-2 0.29+-44% 7.00+-B%
(a) If the result is zero, the error is in pCi/Kg 3-46 8
9 A
III.K.~ Milk Milk samples were collected primarily at two locations during 1983, the Plymouth County Farm,(Station 11 - 3.5 mi - W) and the Whitman Farm (Station 21 - 21 mi - NW). As stated in Section II, three samples were collected from Beaver Dam Road (Station 28 - 2.5 mi - 5) in June, July and September, and all except three samples were collected f rom Plymouth County Farm in early May, late July and early September. Milk samples from Beaver Dam Road will hopefully be collected on a more frequent basis starting in the spring of 1984.
Thus, the only dependable indicator station (within 5 miles) for milk near PNPS-1 during 1983 was from the Plymouth County Farm. ' This was confirmed in the 1983 Census (see Appendix E). When available, samples were collected semi-monthly when animals are on pasture (generally May through October) and montuly at other' times.
The results of the ERMAP program for the milk medis are presented in Table III-K-1. The results of analyses for Cs-137 and Sr-90 are presented graphically in Figures III-K-1 and III-K-2 respectively.
There were no positive measurements or indications of il-131 in any of the samples. However, for the milk samples collected on 7/8/83, the MDC for I-131 analysis was not met due to the loss of sample in radiochemistry steps.
3-47
e The highest mean concentration of Sr-90 occurred at 8eaver Dam Road (collected on 9/9/83) and the highest mean concentration of Sr-89 occurred at the Plymouth County Farm (collected on 5/26/83).
l However, there were no positive measurements made of either Sr-89 or Sr-90, there were only indications of the presence of Sr-90 (activity greater than three times the standard deviation). Station releases for this period exhibited a Sr-89/Sr-90 ratio of about 1/150 and therefore it is unlikely that PNPS-1 is the najor source of the indicator. station activity since the measured Sr-89/Sr-90 was about i
1/10.
In the. case of Cs-137, the highest mean value of concentration
' occurred at Beaver Das Road (2.5 mi - 5). The Cs-137 concentration for Beaver Das Road occurred in early July (collected on 7/8/83).
'The absence of Cs-134 at this location, as well as the other indicator station (Plymouth County Farm), would indicate that the
. primary source of Cs-137 is other than PNPS-1, and was nost likely
- dme to fallout f rom previous atmospheric weapons testing.
l l
'llierefore, it is extremely unlikely that there was any environmental
-impact on milk due to the operation of PNPS.
l l 3-4B
This page intentionally left blank.
l l
1 l
l 3-49 l
t
TABLE III-K-1 ERMAP RESULTS - MILK MEDiLP: MI'J UNITS: PCI/KB IkLICATP STATICN5 STATION WITH HIEFEST MEAN CONTFUL STAT 10NS eeeeeeeeeeeeeetese eessessessee.nesseee+++++ eeeeeeeeeeeeeste EA010ECLIDES PEAN PEA's KEAN (NO. ANALYSES) FAN;E STA. RANGE RANSE (k3N-F0VilkEle LLD N3. DETECTEIee N]. N3. EETECTED+e kD. DETECTE0**
5E-59 ( 67) 10. (-2.5 f 2.6 E -1 22 ( 5.9 2 19.9)E *z ( 5.9 ! 14.4)E -2
( 01 (-2.E - 2.01E O (-2.3 - 3.1)E 0 (-2.3 - 3.15E O
- 0/ 18). *( 0I 31)* el 0/ 49),
5F-92 ( 67) 2. ( 5.4 ! .7)E O 2B (1.1! .2)E 1 ( 4.1 ! .3)E 0
( 0) ( 1.0 - 14.3)E O ( 7.4 - 14.3)E O ( E.2 - 116.01E -1
- ( 15/ 12)+ *( 3/ 3)* el 47/ 49)e IE-7 ( 676 '1.0! 1.9)E O 11 (2.6? 1.BiE 0 (-1.1 2 1.48E 0
( 0) (-1.9 - 1.6)E 1 (-1.0 - 1.6)E 1 (-2.3 - 2.4)E 1
+( 0/ IE)e e( 0/ 15)* et 0/49),
)~- 4 ) ( 67) ( !.4 f .01E 3 11 ( 1.5 ! .0)E 3 ( 1.3 ! .0)E 3
( 0) i 1.3 - 1.6)E 3 ( 1.3 - 1.61E 3 ( 9.5 - 16.9)E 2
+( 1B/ 10)+ *( 15/ 15)+ *( 47/ 49)+
CF-51 ( 67) ( 5.7 f 27.1)E -1 ~J l1.21 1.9)E D (-2.1 2 13.7)E -1 i Oe (-2.6 - 2.7)E 1 (-2.6 - 2.0!E 1 (-2. 9 - 2.0)E 1 et 01 16)+ *( O! 311e et 0/ 4-)+
MN-54 i 67) (-1.1 f 2.6)E -1 2E i-3.! ! 29.5)E -2 (-1.6 t 1.3)E -1 i ')) i-2.1 - 2.3)E 0 (-4.7 - 5.3)E -1 (-2.2 - 1.B)E O
+i 0/ IBr+ ei Ol 3)+ ei Of 49).
CO-!! ( 67) ( 4.9 1 2.iiE -1 11 (6.4f 2.9)E -1 (2.11 1. ele -1
( 0) (-1.7 - 2.5)E 0 (-1.7 - 2.5)E D (-3.2 - 3.0)E O
+( C1 18)+ *( Of 15), *( O! 49)*
FE-57 4 67) ( 2.0 f 5.31E -1 21 (5.7f 6.6)E -1 i-4.9t 37.!iE -2 t 01 (-4.3 - 4.0)E O (-3.7 - B.0)E O (-5.E - E.0)E 0
+( 0/ 18)+ et 01 18)* et 01 49+
[0-60 ( 67) (-1.5 ! 3.11E -1 2B i5.4! 4.01E -1 (.;.E : 22.3}E -2 1 0) i-2.9 - 2.51E O (-2.2 - 10.8)E -1 (-4.7 - 3.5)E 0 e1 0! 18)+ e( 0 ,* 31e s( 01 49+
+ WDN-RDUTIhE FETERS TD THE N'JMBEF IT EEF ACATE TE453EMENTS 4iHICH WEEE BFEATEF THAW TEN (10) TIPES THE A?ECASE EAtrSFOUM3 IDE THE FEFID5 0F THE RETD;T.
- THE NTID)2 D7 SAMFLE ANALHEE YlELDINE IETEETAELE PEASLTIMEETS (1.E. )3 STL IIV! ATILNS) 15 ICIEATEL WITH +! )*.
3-50
TABLE III-K-1 CONTINUED MEI!U": Mu INITS: FCin6 INLICATCF. STATION 3 STATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN EONTROL STAT 10N3 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, esseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees, eseeeeeeeeee+ee.
FM10NUCL1LE! MEAN MEAN MEAN (h0. A%LYEES) FANEE STA. RANGE FAN 5E (NON-EDUT!hEle LLD NO. LETECTEDH NO. NO. DETECTEL,, NO. LETECTEDee IN-65 ( 67) (-1.0 : 7.9)E -1 !! I1.22 9.0)E -1 (-4.12 3.4)E -1
( 0) (-4.E - 8.0)E O
(-4.8 - 0.0)E O (-6.1 - 5.3)E 0
,( 01 16)* el 0/ 15ie *( 0/ 49),
ZR-95 ( 67) (6.02 4.1)E -1 28 ( 6.5 i .5)E -1 (-2.0 ; 2.91E -1
( 0) (-2.9 - 3.8lE O ( 5.9 - 7.4)E -1 (-3.9 - 4.9)E O el 01 IB)e et 0/ 3)e et 0/ 49).
RU-103 ( 67) (-6.4 ! 2.1)E -1 !! (-6.21 2.4)E -1 l-9.0 1 1.51E -1
( 01 (-2.0 - .7)E O (-2.0 - .7)E 0 (-3.4 - 1.9)E O
- ( 0! 19)+ el 01 15)e +( 0/ 49),
F'J-106 ( 67) ( 1.3 2 250.5)E -2 21 ( 1.1 ! 3.0)E O (-4.1 ! 17.6!E -1
( 0) (-2.1 - 2.1)E 1 (-2.4 - 3.1)E 1 (-2.4 - 3.1)E 1
- ( 0/ 18)* *( C/ 18)* *( 0/ 49)*
l-131 ( 67) 2. (-9.9f 17.2)E -3 21 ( 2.1 ! 1.0)E -2 (6.23 10.B)E -3
! 01 4-2.6 - .7)E -1 (-3.7 - 13.1)E -2 (-2.5 - 1.9tE -1
- ( 0/ 16)+ 4' 0/ 15)+ 4( ll 49)*
ES-134 i 67) 15. (-4.5! 3.!!E -l !! (-3.4 ! 3.5)E -1 (-9.1 f 1.1)E -1
( 0) (-2.4 - 1.9)E D (-2.4 - 1.9)E O (-2.6 - 1.0)E O 4( Of IBi, +( 0/ 15), *( 0/ 49),
E3-137 ( 671 15. ( 8.42 2.5)E O 28 ( 2.2 .15)E 1 (1.0t 4)E 1
! 01 ( 4.7 - 345.0)E -1 ( 1.2 - A.0)E 1 (-1.9 - 1EE0.0)E -1
+( 12/ 19)+ *( 3/ 3)* *( 401 49)*
BA-140 ( 671 15. (-3.6? 4.0)E -1 26 ( 2.2 ! 114.5)E -2 (-2.12 2.5)E -1
( 0) (-3.1- 4.2)E O (-1. 6 - 2.2)E O I-3.B - 3.3)I O
+( 0/ 1Ble *( 0/ 3)e *( 01 49).
EE 141 ( 67) ( 5.4 1 3.3)E -1 21 ( 1.4 i .4)E O t5.32 3.2)E -1
( 0) 1-1.7 - 3.4)E 0 (-1.2 - 5.1)E O (-4.4 - 5.4)E O 4( 01 16)+ +( 0/ 1B14 *( O! 47)+
' EE-144 ( 67) '- 1. 7 1.51E 0 2B (-3.3 ! 28.2)E -1 (-2.41 1.11E O
( 0) (- 1. 5 - . ele I (-4. 5 - 5.1)E D (-1.9 - 2.1)E 1 4( 01 12)* 41 0/ 31* *( 0/ 49)*
- ICN-EL'11NE PETEF3 TD THE NMEF OF SEFARATE MEASUEEMENTS WHIEH WERE 6;EATEP.
THati TEN (10) TIME 31HE AVESA5E EACK6RDM F08 THE FEE 10D DF THE FIf 0RT.
e* THE Ff4ETICN UF 3ANFLE ANALYSES YlELDING LETECTMLE MEASUPEMENT5 (1.E. >3 STD IEVIATIDNS) IS IE1IATED M1TH 41 )*.
3-51
FIGURE III-K-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF Cs-137 in MILK 3
Ed ii EE m ?
i n*
Y EM w
U '.
E8 x !?
J
" 20 E E%
hE EW~
Ei!
-r Ew b
E :.
E !$
O J E&
?
{ ~~-=
-u :.
22 ": 8:
.o.o
. .=
=
+==+=
l*J e= += :'
mm ""
il il E%
DD*s DO*t DD*3 DD D 00*dt DO* S W68007IW/S31NO303Id 3-52 l
FIGURE III-K-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF Sr-90 in MlLK L
I E
-w 0
5"
- *e I {D
- E
'r E.*
EM o E-Cy}
1 !D
- n E i O b*
x :
.J 5 E. sn O
'E
' F
[k E :
O >
ia*c J
-e
- g A e
-m N . ": " .
22 :=
.o o= :"
- 4.-4 =
CE :S 4- 4-- :ene 03EO :b 11 11 i ~
! M9 ,
- E E'
l os et w. as+ ss as3 STD DEVIATIBNS) IS INDIEATED WITH *( )*.
i 3-55
TABLE III-L-1 CONTINUED MEDIUM: CRANBERRIES UNITS: PCI/K6 NET INDICATORSTATIONS STATION NITH H16 HEST MEAN CONTROL STATIONS H64HetHl46fHH HillH6466Hil564H64H6 644H H H HIHet RADIONUCLIDES MEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) RAN6E STA. RANGE RANGE (NON-ROUTINEle LLD NO. DETECTEDH NO. NO. DETECTED ** NO. DETECTE0**
RU-103 ( 31 (1.5i .8)E 0 13 (2.31 11.8)E 0 (-1.2i .8)E 1
( 0) ( 7.7 - 22.7)E -1 et 0/ 2)e *( 0/ 1)* tt 0/ 1)*
RU-106 ( 3) (-1.7! 2.2)E 1 23 ( 6.2 1 6.6)E 1 ( 6.2 1 6.6)E 1
( 0) (-3.9 - .5)E 1 6( 01 2)e st 0/ 1)* et01 11e 1-131 ( 3) 80. ( 1.1 i .1)E 1 13 ( 1.2 1 3.1)E 1 ( 5.3 1 22.9)E O
( 0) ( 9.3 - 12.1)E 0 et 0/ 2)* et 0/ 1)* el el 1)*
CS-134 ( 3) 80. (-4.9t .6)E O 14 (-4.21 7.5)E O (-7.22 8.41E O
( On (-5.5 - 0.01E 9 et 0/ 21e el OI lie et01 1)*
3 -137 ( 31 B0. (1.5i 1.4)E 2 13 (2.9! - .2)E 2 (1.3f .9)E 1
( 1) ( 1.5 - 25.8)E 1 et il 2)e el 11 lie *( 01 1)*
BA-140 ( 31 (-3.32 ~7.3)E 6 23 (1.62 1.2)E 1 ( !.6 f 1.21E 1
( 0) (-1.1 - .4)E 1
- ( 0/ 2)* *( 01 1)* it 01 11e -
EE-141 ( 3) (3.02 9.5)E O 23 (1.Bf 1.3)E 1 (1.52 1.3)E 1
( 0) (-6.5 - 12.5)E 0 4( 01 2)* et01 1)* 41 01 1)*
EE-144 ( 31 (-2.21 1 6)E 1 14 (3.41 3.6)E 1 (2.62 41.7)E 0
( 0) (-7.8 - 3.4)E 1
- ( 01 2)* *( Of 1)e it 31 1)4 E-22B ( 31 (6.12 51.7)E -1 23 (3.62 3.3)E 1 (3.63 3.3)E 1
( 0) (-4.6 - L B)E 0
- ( 01 2)* st 01 11e et Of 1)*
ee TIE FRACTION (F SAMPLE ANALYSES Y1ELDIN6 ETEITABLE EASUREENTS (I.E. >3 STD EVIATID115) IS IW3CATED WITH *( ) n.
3-56
_ . , ... _._w... .
III.M. Veaetation Samples of tuberous and green leafy vegetables were collected at the time of harvest at five locations: Plymouth County Farm (3.5 mi - W), Bridgewater Farm (20 mi - W), the Evans Residence (0.7 mi
- W), the Work Residence (0.6 mi - ESE), and the Whipple Farm (1.5 mi - SSW). The MDC for samples at three of the above locations (the Evans Residence, Work Residence and Whipple Farm) does not appear to have been met. This was due'to an increase in processing time at the Laboratory as a result of a failure to place priority special sensitivity designation on the gamma spectrometry processing forms. The Laboratory has already addressed this situation (YAEL Memo fEL 57/84, dated 2/24/84).
The results of the ERMAP program for this media are presented in Table III-M-1.
The only isotopes observed (other than naturally occurring Ac11t-228 (peak) and K-40) was Be-7 and Cs-137. A positive l
1 measurement of Cs-137 was detected in a vegetation sample from the Evans Residence (ritubarb, collected 9/27/03). The absence of Cs-134 at this location and the fact that measured Cs-137 concentration is about 1,000 times what would be expected at this location based on releases from PNPS-1, strongly indicates that fallout, not PNPS-1, is the primary source of this Cs-137.
Therefore, it is extremely unlikely that there was any environmental impact on vegetation due to the operation of PNPS-1.
3-57
TABLE III-M-1 ERMAP RESULTS - VEGETATION MEDIUR: FOOD CRDP UNITS: PCl/K6 NET INDICATOR STATIONS STATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL STATIONS eteesenesessesseen seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeens eseeeeeeeeeeeeee RABIONUCL1 DES MEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) RAN6E STA. RANGE RANGE INDN-ROUTINE)s LLD NO. DETECTEDee NO. NO. DETECTEDee NO. DETECTEDee EE-7 ( 9) (l.5i .8)E 2 16 (4.41 1.3)E 2 (8.41 15.6)E 1
( 0) (-2.8 - 44.1)E 1 (-1.5 - 5.3)E 2 et 2/ 5)e e( 1/ 11e et 1/ 4)e K-40 ( 9) (2.31 .3)E 3 16 (3.61 .4)E 3 ( 2.9 i .9)E 3
( 0) ( 1.7 - 3.6)E 3 ( 9.6 - 52.4)E 2
- ( 51 5)* e( 11 1)* et 4/ 4)e ER-51 ( 9) (6.61 4.3)E 1 16 (2.1! 1.4)E 2 (2.11 1.8)E 1
( 0) (-5.5 - 20.6)E 1 (-1.4 - 7.2)E 1
- ( 0/ 5)* et 0/ 1)e et 0/ 4)e fut-54 ( 9) 130. (l.01 3.4)E 0 11 (5.91 2.1)E 0 (-2.71 5.1)E 0
( 0) (-1.0 - 1.0)E 1 ( 2.7 - 9.8)E 0 (-1.5 - .7)E 1
- ( CI 5)* *( 0/ 3)e *( 01 Als
'ED-58 ( 9) 130. ( 2.5 t 4.7)E 0 11 (6.41 6.9)E 0 (-4.11 60.11E -1
( 0) (-8.4 - 17.8)E 0 (-6.1 - 17.8)E 0 (-8.6 - 17.3)E O
.*( 9/ 5)* *( Of 3)* et of 4)*
'TE-59 ( 9) 260. (-8.7t 9.9)E 0 27 (2.11 1.4)E 1 (1.71 1.0)E 1
( 0) (-4.5 - 1.2)E 1 ( 3.4 - 48.1)E 0 ( 3.4 - 48.1)E O
- ( 01 5)* *( 0/ 3)* el 01 4ls 13-60 ( :9) 130. 1-9.12 3.9)E 0 17 (-2.51 5.6)E D (-6.41 4.3)E 0
( 0) (-l.7 - .3)E 1 (-1.6 - .2iE 1 l
- ( 01 5)* *( 01 1)* *( 01 4)*
716-65 ( 9) ~260. (-1.5t .9)E 1 43 (6.21 18.4)E D (-5.11 10.6)E 0
( el (-4.3 - .8)E 1 (-3.1 - 1.7)E 1
- ( 01 5)* *( 01 1)* et 0/ 4)*
2R-95 ( 9) (l.51 .9)E 1 16 ( 4.1 2 2.7)E 1 (-2.11 11.41E O
( 0) (-8.7 - 41.01E O (-2.2 - 2.8)E 1
- ( 01 5)* a( 01 11e et 0/ 4)*
- ENHt00 TIE REFERS 1D Tif 4tlSER W SEPARATE MEASURE 9IENTS 4fMID( WERE GREATER 146AN TEN (10) TifES THE AYERAEE DACKERDUND FOR THE PERIDD OF THE REPORT.
l ** TE FRACTTilu (F SINFLE AllALYSES TIELDING DETECTABLE flEASUREfENTS (1.L )3 STD llEVIATIDelS) IS IEICATED 411TH *( le.
3-58
. . . - . . . - - . . . . . . . . . - . . ~ . . - . . . . .
TABLE III-M-1 CONTINUED MEDIUM: FOOD CRDP UNITS: PCl/K6 ET INDICATDR STATIONS STAT 1DN NITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL STAT!DNS M4H4M64H6Hlit 444444MM44M444444 tf H 6 MH44444*MM64 ,
RADIONUCLICES MEAN fEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) RANGE STA. RANEE RANGE (NON-ROUTINE)* LLD NO. DETEETED44 ND. NO.IIETECTED44 NO. DETECTED 64 RU-103 ( 9) (-B.0f 30.5)E -1 11 (3.02 2.6)E 0 (-5.72 4.5)E 0
( 01 (-1.1 - .71E 1 (-1.8 - 7.0)E 0 (-1.B - .41E 1
- ( 01 5)4 4( 01 314 4( 01 4)*
RU-106 ( 9) (-1.31 3.41E 1 11 (2.0f 4.81E 1 (-1.12 5.11E 1
( 0) (-B.4 - 10.6)E 1 E5.9 - 10.6)E 1 (-9.1 - 13.8)E 1 si 01 514 *( 9/ ~ 315 e t 01 4)*
I-131 ( 9) BD. (-2.If 1.71E 1 43 (2.02 3.11E 1 (1.32 1.21E 1
( 0) (-B.6 - 1.11E 1 (-6.9 - 45.31E 0 e( 01 5)* *( Of 1H *( 01 4)*
CS-134 ( 9) 80. (-4.52 4.61E 0 27 ( 2.5 2 7.7)E 0 (4.02 54.91E -1
( 0) (-3.1 - .6)E 1 E1.1 - 1.31E 1 E1.1 - 1.31E 1 e( 01 :514 e( 01 3)* *( 01 4)*
CS-137 ( 91 80. (7.72 11.01E 0 17 (4.62 .5)E 1 (7.12 7.8)E 0
( !) (-2.2 - 4.61E 1 (-1.4 - .2.2)E 1 i *( 11 ~5H -*( 11.Ile *( 01 4)*
l 10.11E 0 43 (1.5f 2.51E 1 (1.92 5,71E O BA-140 ( 9) (-7.6f
( 01 (-4.4 - 1.51E 1 (-1.3 - 1.51E 1
- ( 01~5)* -*( DI 1H *( 01 4)*
CE-141 ( 9) (5.92 18.81E -1 43 (1.4f 1.111 1 (1.1f 1.0)E 1
( 01 (-4.5 - ;6.2)E 0 . E1.2 - '3.41E 1
- ( el 5)* -*( 01 Ile *( 01 4)*
CE-144 ( 9) (2.42 1.61E :1 11 (4.72 1.BIE 1 ( 2.5 2 2127.51E -2
( 0) (-B.6 - ' 71.41E 0 ( 1.1 - 7.1}E 1 (-4.5 - 3.7)E 1
- ( 01 5H *( 01 314 *( 01 4)*
16 (2.21 4.2)E 1 M.6 2 4.21E D AC-228 ( 9) (4.9f B.5)E O
( 0) (-2.2 - 2.2)E 1 (-1.9 - .21E 1 a t 01 5)* -*( DI 1)* *( 01 4)*
et TE FRACTIDf. DF SAMPLE ANALYSES VIEL3]N6 DETEETaLE fEASUREfENTS (1.E. >3 STD DEVIATIONS) IS I E ICATED NITH *( le.
3-59
III.N. Forace Beef forage is collected from three locations annually: the Plymouth County Fann (3.5 mi - W - Station Number 11), Whitman Farm (21 mi - NW
- Station 21) and Bridgewater Farm (20 mi - W - Station 27). The results of the ERMAP program for the media are presented in Table III-N-1. The following positive measurements were made: Be-7 and Cs-137 at the Plymouth County Farm; Be-7 at the Bridgewater Farm; and, Be-7 at the Whitman Farm. In addition, all. stations had a positive measurement of K-40, and the Plymouth County Farm also had a positive measurement of AcTh-228 (peak).
The only positive measurement of Cs-137. occurred.at-the Plymouth County Farm. The Plymouth County Farm is an indicator station and is located 3.5 miles - W from PNPS-1. The measured Cs-137 concentration is about 1,000 times what would be expected at this location; based on Teleases from PNPS-1. This strongly indicates that fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing, not PNPS-1, is.the primary source of this l
Therefore, it is extremely unlikely that there as any environmental impact:en forage due to the operation of PNPS-1.
l l
l l
3-60 l
l
TABLE III-N-1 ERMAP RESULTS - FORAGE MEDIUM: CATTLE FEED (MITS: PCl/K6 INDICATOR STATIONS STATION WITH M16 HEST MEAN CONTROL STATIONS ,
munm*mem unnunummnenu unneemmu RADIONUCLIDES MEAN MEAN MEAN (NO. ANALYSES) RAN6E STA. RANGE RAN6E (NON-ROUTINE)* LLD NO. DETECTEDn NO. NO. DETECTED u NO. DETECTED **
. . ....... . ... ..=
BE-7 ( 3) (1.0t .11E 3 27 (l.5t .1)E 3 (1.1f .4)E 3
( 0)
( 7.1 - 15.5]E 2
- ( 1/ 1)* *( 1/ 116 *( 2/ 2)*
K-40 ( 31 (9.31 .31E 3 27 (2.1! .1)E 4 ( 2.0 i .11E 4
( 0) ( l.0 - 2.11E 4
- ( 1/ 1)* *( 1/ lie *( 21 2)*
CR-51 ( 3) ( 8.h ! B.8)E 1 11 ( 8.7 i 8.8)E 1 (-3.9f 12.41E 1
( 0) (-l.6 - .91E 2
- ( 0/ 1)* *( 0/ 1)* *( of 21e MN-54 ( 31 130. (3.5f 9.41E O 21 (1.3f 1.01E 1 ( 9.6 f 3.01E 0
( 01 ( 6.5 - 12.61E 0
- ( 0/ lli *( 0/ 11* *( 0/ 2)*
CD-58 ( 31 130. (2.33 9.51E O 11 (2.33 9.5)E 0 (-9.3 1 5.91E O
( 01 (-1.5 - 0.0)E 1
- ( 0/ 1)* *( 01 lie *( 01 2)+
FE-59 ( 31 260. (-3.0f 2.21E 1 21 (-1.33 2.5)E 1 (-1.91 .61E 1
( 01 (-2.5 - 0.01E 1
- ( 01 1)* *( 0/ 1)* 4( 01 21*
CD-60 ( 31 130. (B.7f 14.31E 0 11 i B.7 f 14.31E 0 ( 8.2 f 42.BIE -1
( 0) (-3.5 - 5.11E 0
- ( 01 11+ *( 01 lie -*( 01 2)*
IN-65 ( 3) 2 60. (-1.51 2.01E 1 21 (3.51 2.8)E 1 ( 1.5 f 13.3)E O
( 0) (-3.2 - 3.51E 1
- ( 01 1)* *( 0/ lie *( 01 2)*
2R-95 ( 3) (-1.5f 1.8]E 1 21 (2.13 1.9)E 1 (4.11 16.61E 0
( 0) (-1.3 - 2.1]E 1
- ( 01 lie *( 01 lie *( 01 2)4 i
TABLE III-N-1 CONTINUED flEDIlm: I%TTLE FEED (MITS: PCIIK6 INDIEATDR STAT 10NS STATION NITH HIGEST MEAN CONTROL STATIONS
++ sue +4 neue*** usueennuseu++++ wee unneneuene MEAN MEAN MEAN
' RADIDiluCLIES (ND. ANALYSES) RANGE STA. RANGE RAN6E 110. DETECTEDu NO. NO. DETEETDe* NO. DETECTEDee (NDN-RDl!TlHE)* LLB RD-103 ( 31 ( B.9 2 9.91E 0 11 (B.9f 9.91E O (-6.9i 5.4lE O
( 01 (-1.2 - 0.01E 1 et 01 lie et 01 lie et 01 21e RU-106 ( 31 (-B.63 B.41E 1 11 (-0.6i B.41E 1 (-1.0i .01E 2
( 01 (-1.0 - 0.01E 2
- ( 01.11e et 01 lie *( 01 21e 1-131 ( 31 80.
(-3.12 2.B)E 1 21 ( 1.7 f 2.51E 1 (!.2i 15.9)E 0
't 01 (-1.5 - 1.7!E 1 it 0/ .11e *( 01 lie et 01 2)*
'IS-134 ( '3) 80. (-1.2f 1.0lE 1 21 (-5.83 12.31E 0 (-7.9f 2.11E 0
( 01 (-1.0 - 0.01E 1 te( 01 lie *( 01 lie *( 0/ 2)*
(7.2f 1.01E 1 (-2.9 i .41E O ES-137 ( 31 80. (7.22 1.01E 1 11
( 11 (-3.3 - 0.0lE O e( 11 1)* *( 11 1)* *I 0/ 2)*
B4-140 ( 31 (-2.83 2.11E 1 21 (-1.4f 2. ole 1 (-3.4 f 2.0lE 1
( 01 (-5.3 - 0.01E 1
-et 01 114 *( 01 11e et 0/ 2)*
. E-141 ( 31 (2.81 1.41E 1 11 (2.Bf 1.4)E 1 ( B.B f 11.BIE 0
( 01 (-3.0 - 20.61E O
- ( 01 1)* *( 01 lie et 01 2)*
EE-144 ( 31 (7.12 44.9]E O 27 (5.3f 4.01E 1 (-7.61 40.7)E 0
( 01 (-4.B - 5.3)E 1
-*( of .1)* *I Of lie a( 0/ 2)*
AE-22B ( 31 ( B.O 3 3.BlE 1 11 ( B.0 2 3.BIE 1 ( 4.7 2 24.91E 0
( 01 (-2.0 - 3.0lE 1 4( 01 1)* *( Of lie et 01 2)*
- e TE FRACTION IF SAMPLE AllALYSES VIELDlW6 DETEITABLE MEASUREENTS (1.L )3 STB XVIAT10HS) IS 1NDICATD N1TH *( le.
3-62
.._...._m . . . .. .
IV. References
- 1. Regulatory Guide 1.109 - CALCULATION OF ANNUAL DOSES TO MAN
~ FROM ROUTINE RELEASES OF REACTOR EFFLUENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF 4
EVALUATING COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR PART 50, APPENDIX I - l l
Revision 1, October.1977.
4
- 2. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN MASSACHUSETTS li1LDLIFE-FEDERATION i
AND BOSTON EDISON COMPANY RELATING TO OFFSITE RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING - June 9,1977.
- 3. Yankee Atomic Electric Company - Program "ERMAP", Version 3.1
- -January 9,1979, Author - J. E.,Vossahlik.
- 4. Memoranda, Yankee Atomic Electric Coupany,1983 Annual Direct Radiation Survey, REG 199/83, .0ctober 1983, :E. : R. ~Eumming.
- 5. Memoranda, Yankee Atomic Electric Company, REE.' 211n6, l
A. E. Desrosiers.
r
- 6. Report on Accumulation of Cesium - 137 in C,..L. ,ies, March 1979, Yankee Atomic Electric Company, M. Strum.
4-1
1 APPENDIX A - ANOMALOUS MEASUREMENT REPORTS 5
.k
-1 1 -
.g I
e f
h s
I i T i
A-1
There were no Anomalous Measurement Reports for the year of 1983.
I l
t i
A-2
l l
r t
APPENDIX B - Radioactive Effluents ,
1 I
i
?
I 1
i 6
i t
1 i .
4 1r l
t e
8 I.
]
I.
l l
l *
\\ B-1
r EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT a Supplemental information JANUARY - JUNE 1983 t
Focility Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Ucensee DPR-35 i
J m I. Regulsiory Umits
- a. Fissen and activation gase, OS QV g 1 0.25/[ .+ 0.10/p 4 b. todines 2 Ci per quarter
- c. Particulates. half hves >A dJ> s-10Ci per 13q1 ar. E4Qs + 1.8E5Qv) -1 4
. d. laquid eriluents: er
- 2. Masimum Permissible Concentrafica PiimJe the MPrs used in dciernunmg allowable rele.nc rates or oncentratums.
- a. Fissum and aesivation gases to CFR 20
- h. lodmes: Appendix 5
- c. Part sculaies. half lives >N days: Table 11 d, Laquid effluenas H . 3 = 1 X 10-5 JCifnit: alt rest.18CHt 29. Appendix B.Tabie n
- 3. Average Energy Pnmde ile avesage energy (U of the radamuclule masiuse m seicases of fissman and aciavationpses.ii apphat le. f . .m.
1st quarter, MS=0.78 & RBV=0.66: 2nd quarter, MS=0.491 RBV=0.47
- 4. Mesmerements and Approumations of Total Radioaesmay Provide he meifaids used to siicasure or approsisitaic the total radmiastavity rrietuaaevitsarid tiie meiliods used to determrne radamuchde composiimm.
- a. F ssion and acswstampses: C.eu
, b. lodines:
- c. Particulaies-4 .
- d. bquid ettluesits: w Ws
- 5. asseh IIreesses ProuJe ilet tollowmg mfornution relatmg io batch releases of radmaaciive nuterut, m hqud and gasenus effluents.
~
m
- a. Ugned 9
7' I. %mber of hatch releases- 64
' 2. Toial time penod tor hatch releases: 103.47 hours5.439815e-4 days <br />0.0131 hours <br />7.771164e-5 weeks <br />1.78835e-5 months <br />
- 3. Maumum time permd for a baide release. - 3.42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> l -
- **erare "me Pe<='d 'or hatch releases: 1.62 hours
' FT l
- 5. Mmimum time period foi a hatch release - 0.
' t; 6. AveraFe stream ihm dunng penods of release of hours ni unto (kmmg a stisarn- ? 3E-+ SGPM
., b. Gaseous (Not Apphsable) 5
- 6. Abnoriumi Ecleases 1
1 [none a
l lj l
,[
i ~7 2
TABLE 1 A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT
. {; GASEOUS EFFLUENTS. SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Ij JANUARY - JUNE 1983
- Quarter Quarter Est. Total Unit Error, %
(1) (2)
A. Fission and activation gases L. 1. Total release Ci 1.33E+4 3.41E+3 25 l
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/see 1.71E+3 4.34E+2
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification limit % 0.5400 0.089 B. Iodines
- 1. Totaliodine-131 Ci 6.62E-3 7.09E-3 25 l
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 8.51E-4 9.02E-4
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification limit % 0.331 0.355 r C. Particulates
- n. 1. Particulates with half-lives > 8 days Ci 3.39E-3 3.44E-3 30 l
- 2. Average release rate for period PCi/sec 4.36E-4 4.38E-4
3. Percent of Technical Specification limit % 0.045 0.052 3 4. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci <3.24E-7 41.19E-6
, D. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 4.77E+1 6.80E0 35 l
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 6.13E0 8.65E-1
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification limit % .
?
fE 3
1 4
fJ t "1
1 3
TABLE 1B EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI ANNUAL REPORT (1983 )
. GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - ELEVATED RELEASE JANUARY - .1UNE 1983 CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE b Unit Quarter l Quarter l Quarter l Quarter l L, l Nuclides Released l l i (1) (2)
- 1. Fission gases i
f# krypton-85 Ci 4 1.45E-3 41. 82E-2 L- krypton-85m Ci 2.01E+3 5.43E+2 krypton-87 Ci 1.44E+3 1.67E+2 krypton-88 Ci 3.88E+3 7.60E+2
[~
I~ zenon-133 Ci 3.76E+3 1.77E+3 b zenon-135 Ci 1.84E+3 5.01E+1 xenon-135m Ci - -
L xenon-138 Ci - -
L- zenon-131m Ci _ _
t j , xenon-137 Ci _ -
menon-133m Ci 1.20E+2 1.04E+1 Total for period Ci 1.31E+4 3.30E+3
.2.1mdi===
F iadine-131 Ci 3.53E-3 4.10E-3
,, iodine-133 Ci 1.58E-2 2.00E-2 iadi=-135 Ci 2.68E-2 1.90E-2 Total for penod Ci 4.61E-2 4.31E-2 4
3.Wh strontium-89 Ci 4.74E-4 6.38E-4 strontium-90 Ci 4.39E-6 9.59E-6
)lp[ cesium-134 Ci 3.69E-7 3.94E-6 cesium-137 Ci 1.64E-5 8.23E-5 berium-lanthanum-140 Ci 1.55E-3 1.06E-3 I j chromium 51 Ci -
manganese-54 Ci 6.16E-6 8.32E-6
, cobalt-58 Ci - 4.28E-6 2 fron-59 Ci 8.69E-7 -
cobalt 40 Ci 3.60E-5 5.38E-5 i -es ci - 2 eot-e E^ zirconium-niobium-95 Ci - -
- cerunn-141 Ci 7.20E-6 1.72E-6 i
cerium-144 Ci - 3.44E-6 ruthenium-103 Ci - -
ruthenium-106 Ci - -
4
j-
~
TABLE 1C EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1983)
GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - GROUND LEVEL RELEASE JANUARY - JUNE 1983
~ CONTINUDUS MODE BATCH MODE Overter Quarter Quarter O e rter Nuclides Reiseosd Unit j
(1) (2)
- 1. Fission gases krypton-85 Ci 4.91E-6 _2.57E-6 krypton-85m Ci 1.17E+1 6.10E0 krypton-87 Ci 3.08E+1 1.44E+1 ci 3.31E+1 1.41E+1
- krypton-88 i Ci 2.04E+1 1.70E+1 xenon 133 Ci 7.17E+1 5.42E+1 xenon-135 zenon-135m Ci - -
zenon 138 Ci - -
Total for period Ci 1.68E+2 1.06E+2 c 2. lodines iodine-131 Ci 3.09E-3 2.QQE-3 Ci 1.96E-2 1.90E-2 iodine-133 Ci 2.91E-2 2.71E-2 i" 'e.line-135 4.91E-2
' total for period Ci 5.18E-2 a
3.Particulates D strontium 89 Ci 7.16E-4 5.82E-4 Ci 1.27E-6 1.15E-6
, strontium-90 Ci - 1.87E-5 l cesium-134
' ' Ci 2.10E-5 1.59E-4 cesium-137 Ci 4.94E-4 3.95E-4 barium-lanthanum-140 Ci 1.50E-6 3.32E-5 f{j[ mangn: 54 - 2.56E-5 cobalt-58 Ci iron-59 Ci 5.71E-5 3 . 8N-4 f.-i e cobalt-60 Ci sine-65 Ci
- zirconium-niobium-95 Ci _ _
cerium-141 Ci _ _
ruthenium-103 Ci -
ruthenium-106 Ci -
1
.5 7
" - - - , - - - ~ - - - - . , - , __
o LA TABLE 2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI ANNUAL REPORT (1983) 7 LlOUID EFFLUENTS. SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES l JANUARY - JUNE 1983 7
j -
. Quarter cuaner . Est. Total Unit (1) (2) Ew. %
A. Fission and activation products
- 1. Total release (not including tritium, Ci noble gases, or alpha) 2.39E-2 2.41E-2 ~30
- 2. Average diluted concentration pCi/mi 1.96E-8 4.16E-9
- during period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % 0.239 0.241 B. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 1.34E-3 1.37E-3 30 e- 2. Average diluted concentration gCi/ml 1.10E-9 2.36E-10 during period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % 0.011 0.002
? C. Dissolved and entrained gases
. 1. Total release ci 3.24E-6 - 40 l
- 2. Average diluted concentration uCi/ml 2.66E-12 -
during period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % - -
. D. Gross alpha radioactivity l 1. Total release l Ci l<1.01E-5 l 4 3.25E-5 l 40 l E. Volurne of waste released (prior liters 3.38E+4 7.49E+4 20 1I to dilution)
F. Volurne of dilution water used liters 1.22E+9 -5.80E49 20 q during period ij
?
E r'
6 l.
,9 bb TABLE 2B
'{d EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1983) p, LIGUID EFFLUENTS
( JANUARY - JUNE - 1983 9 $
CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE k
Nuclides Released Unit Quarter Quarter Oher QuNek strontium 89 Ci 4 1.07E-5 4 9.91E-6 strontium-90 Ci 4.14E-5 4.75E-5 cesium-134 Ci 3.44E-4 2.37E-4 cesium.137 Ci 3.85E-3 2.72E-3 iodine-131 Ci 3.41E-5 8.60E-6 cobalt-58 Ci 2.58E-4 5.53E-4
., cobalt-60 Ci 8.73E-3 9.69E-3 iron-59 Ci 1.87E-5 9.33E-5 zinc-65 Ci -
7.22E-5
<- manganese-54 Ci 5.29E-4 6.92E-4 chromium-51 Ci 5.15E-4 3.77E-4 zirconimum-niobium-95 Ci -
3.41E-6
.. molybdenum 99-7.74E-6 5.53E-6 I technetium 99m Ci l
I barium-lanthanum-140 Ci 5.30E-5 2.47E-5 cerium-141 Ci 7.00E-6 9.27E-6
,rr iodine-133 Ci 4.86E-6 1.60E-6 l {# Ci cerium-144 - -
L7' silver 110m Ci -
7.53E-6 l iron 55 Ci 6.75E-3 ~ 6.73E-3 l unidentified l Ci l l 2.74E-3 l 2.85E-3 l i
l Total for period (above) Ci 2.39E-2 2.41E-2 h
I \
l'3 xenon-133 Ci 3.24E-6 -
g renon 135 Ci - -
4 I41
,r
., 7 a
c.---~.-~~-s - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - -
'1-TABLE 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT (1983)
SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPME'iTS l3 JANUARY - JUNE, 1983 l7 A. SOLID WASTE Stum.u 0FF SITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL. (not irradiated fuel) l L.
- 1. TYPE OF WASTE 6 MONTH EST. TOTAL l ET PERIOD
- l. ERROR %
1;
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, m3 72.78 ,,j evaporator botto=s, etc. Ci Sh5.688
- b. Dry compressible vaste, m 256.27 Ci N/A contaminated equipmen , etc. 40.15671
- c. Irradiated components, m3 none N/A control rods, etc. Ci lY ~
- d. Other (Describe) m none N/A Miscellaneous low .evel vaste Ci
- .2. ESTIMATE OF MAJOR RUmm COMPOSITION. (by type of vaste)
% , E(Curies)
- a. St>ent Resin. Tilter Sludges, Co-60 26.828 1h6.39678
~ ~
Eintorator Bottoms etc. Co-58 .693 3.782Lu Cs-137 .536 35.66608
~~ Cs-134 .783 h.27017 Fe-55 55.881 303.29898 Fe-59 .020 .11031 I-131 .359 1.95829 I-133 .150 .81750 La-lho .080 .h3924
,. . Ba-lho .072 .39555 Sr-69 5.501 30.01818 g: Sr-90 .139 .75918 Tc-99m .130 .70826 L'
Zn-65 .185 1.01203 Mn-54 1.647 8.98995 Zr-95 .001 .00590 f'4 Cr-51 1.099 5.99884 Ce-lh1 .009 .04766 Xe-133 .02h .13210 Sb-122 .054 .29280
' f*} Y-91m .003 .01h55
. Mo-99 .085 46548
. Lg, ,
I-135 .012 .06518 Na-2h .008 .04253 g TOTALS 100.000 5h6.68800 V
ls N
3 i4
l
- - % E(Curies)
- b. Dry Compressible Waste Co-60 37.2h5 1h.95628 Contaminated Equipment Co-58 2.k86 .998hD
' El Cs-137 3.650 1.h6575 Cs-13h .8h8 .3h059 Fe.-55 3.985 1.60038 l l
Fe-59 .099 .03970 I-131 1.7h2 .699h3 Ba-lho ,
2.589 1.03972 Sr-89 5.Sh3 2.22578 Sr-90 .118 .0h720
_ Zn-65 956 .38397 Mn-SL 3.860 1.5h99h Cr-51 36.879 1h.80951 I
,; TOTAL i 100.000 h0.15671 d,.
- c. U/A
- d. N/A 4
- 3. SOLID WASTE DISPOSITION l' .
Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination a; 3h Tractor-Trailer 3arnwell, S.C.
V IERADIATED TUEL SHIPME3TS (Disposition) l} h.
Number of Shir=ents Mode of Transrertation Destination fJ ,
None N/A N/A
, l1i E
=
p4
'?
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Supplemental Information JULY - DECEMBER, 1983 Focilit,s Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Ucenere . DPR 35
- 1. Regulatoe> Umits Fnu..r and acination s ses QS + QV a.
g, l
~
U 257 E 0.10/ [
- b. loomes 2Ci/ Quarter
- c. Peticulates. l;atr.Ines >m a'"
- d. LquiJ eiweais 13(1.8E4Qs +1.8E5Qv) 4 1 10Ci/Q uarter
- 2. Masimum Permissible Concentration PiouJe it.c stPCs used in deternuning allouable relea>c rates or .oncentration>
- a. Fmn+. and actnatnm gases 10 CFR 20
- h. loJines Appendia B
- s. P. n..naies. half-laes >h daF Table 11
- d. Liqs:J etiluents H . 3 = I X 10-S pCi/ml.all rest,10 CFR 20, Appendin B. Table ll
- 3. Aver: ige Energs Proude ih asciaye energy til of ti,e nada.nu.hde nuuine m eclease os tisuon and seination gasca. e app..c#le E = 1 ster ,
- 4. 3rd Quarter'Approumanons Meawstrnents and of Total Radioae mesMS=0.26 & RBV=0 70:4th Quarter, MS=0.20 & RBV=0.65 Pros-Js "i. me'h.Qs used to measure .u appioumate the sotal raJn a.inity m etfluen:> anJ ific ref..d uva te detema.e tadion a.i.Je .. mtv utoir.
- a. E n<- .e ar.J a. nati.m pases c,tg h I"J . - y ,
6 Pan... a'e-d t .a ..j c *ue n,, Anals ses
- 5. Batch Resca.es Puis a. a= 3ouing mfor: .ait =r 'cu:ms :o Nhb teleases o' raanu.inse ut enai e- luiuid a .J c23c. us et%e-t>
- a. Laguid i s m, .. be.+ re. cases 125
- 1..a. nme pen.e io Ni.ii ,e;<.ne> 184. 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />
%t.s. mum tirne pea.d tor a rai.h " - Z. 25 hours2.893519e-4 days <br />0.00694 hours <br />4.133598e-5 weeks <br />9.5125e-6 months <br /> J beace time peri e sov Ni.l. ieie.ne' 1.4/ hours
- 5. sic,mun. tune penod iin a r stch ie
o be: age stream 11. u dunr.g pen.ds or reicaw 0..? h. ucNM. , flammg sircem 2.37r.i.5 spg
- b. Ga=enus (Not Appliesbie)
- 6. Abnormal Reitsees None b.
2
.__-..._..__._-..--- . - - . . ~ ~ . . - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
TABLE 1 A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT GASEOUS EFFLUENTS-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES JULY - DECEMBER 1983 Quarter Quarter Est. Total unit 3 4 Ermr. %
A.Tission and activation gases
- 1. Total release Ci 2.04E+3 1.34E+3 25 l
- 2. Average release rate for period pCi/sec 2.57E+2 1.69 E+2
- 3. Percent, of Technical Specification limit % o,04 o op B. Iodines
- 1. Totaliodine-131 Ci 1.09E-2 <7.80E-3 25 l
- 2. Average release rate for period p Ci/s : , 37p_q en p,g,a l 3. Percent of Technical Specification limit "e 0.55 40.39 C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with half-lives > 8 days l Ci l44. 26E-3 '43.41E-3 30 l
- 2. Average release rate for period l pCi/sec 45.36E-4 44.29E-4
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification limit % 40.05 4 .04
- 4. Gross alpharadioactivity Ci 42.58E-6 (5.07E-7 D. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 2.58E0 2.77E0 40 l
- 2. Average release rate for period gCi/sec 3.25E-1 3.48E-1
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification limit 'E l t
3
~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- .- .....-. ~ ~~ - , , _ _ , _ _ _
TA,BLE 1B EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMl ANNUAL REPORT ( 1983 )
GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - ELEVATED RELEASE JULY - DECEMBER 1983 CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE Unit ountw4l Ouwtw l ounta l l Nuclides Released l l Overter -3 l i
- 1. Fissica gases krypton-85 Ci 2.39E-2 1.49E-2 krypton 85m Ci 2.57E+2 1_02E+2 krypton 87 Ci 4.58E0 -
krypton 88 Ci 3.07E+2 4.61E+2 xenon-133 Ci 1.28E+3 6.25E+2 xenon-135 Ci 5.85E+1 6.60E0 xenon-135m Ci 2.11ED -
xenon-138 Ci 7.22E0 1.16E+1 xenon-131m Ci xenon-137 Ci xenon-133m Ci Total for period Ci 1 92E+3 1.21E+3
!, 2. Iodines iodine-131 Ci 7.97E-3 l44.67E-3 lodme-133 Ci 2.75E-2 <.2.51E-2 iodine-135 Ci 3. 38E-2 4 1.87E-2 i
Tctal for period Ci 6.03E-2 4 4.85E-2
- 3. Particulates strontium-89 Ci 7.40E-4 4.53E-4 strontium-90 Ci 4.14E-6 5.33E-6 cesium 134 Ci 1.69E-7 9.95E-6 Ci 4 3.47E-5 5.52E-5 cesium *137 barium-lanthanum-140 i Ci 4.1 a7r.1 41 E7 F_ 4 l
chromium 51 Ci manganese 54 Ci 4 7.41E-6 3 29E-7 Ci i cobalt-58 fron-59 Ci.
l cobsit-60 Ci <7 nr_g 41 11r_a l zine 65 Ci 3. 00E-6 zircomum-niobium-95 Ci 1.83E-6 f Ci cerium-141 cerium-144 Ci
{ Ci I ruthenium 103 ruthemum-106 Ci i.
4
__ x._..__._- . . _ . _ . _ . _ ~ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - . . . _ . _ - . - _ , , _ - . . =- -
n.-.___.
TABLE 1C '
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (igg 3)
GASEOUS EFFLUENTS . GROUND LEVEL RELEASE ,
JULY - DECEMBER 1983 BATCH MODE CONTINUOUS MODE Quarter Quarter Quarter i Unit Quarter Nuclities Released
' Ci p_43p+1 3_sqp+1 krypton-88 Ci 1.18E+1 1.78E+1 xenon 133 4.49E+1 Ci 4.81E+1 xenon-135 Ci xenon-135m Ci xenon-138 Total for period Ci 1.20E+2 1.2SE+2
- 2. Iodines Ci !
? RAF 3 41 1tF 1 iodine-131 Ci 2.43E-2 41.69E-2 lodine-133 Ci 45.04E-2 42.98E-2 iodine-135 44.98E-2 Total for period Ci 47.76E-2 i
- 3. Particulates '
I Ci 5.49E-4 4.12E 4 strontium-89 8.17E-7 Ci 8.60E-7 strontium-90 Ci 1 7RF-6 a K7F A cesium 134 7.01E-5 cesium 137 Ci /1.65E-4 6.21E-4 45.10E-4 Ci -
barium-lanthanum-140 Ci 2.69E-5 7.46E-6 manamnese-54 Ci cobalt 58 Ci iron-59 Ci 1.51E-4 2.00E-4
[ cobalt 60 Ci zmc-65
[ Ci zirconium-niobium-95 Ci cenum.141 Ci ruthenium-103 Ci ruthenium-106 5
a ~
~~
-- - - - - ~
TABLE 2A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1983)
LIQUID EFFLUENTS. SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES JULY - DECEMBER 1983 Quarter Quarter Est. Total Unit Error, %
1 4 A. Fission and activation products
- 1. Total release anot including tritium, Ci 2.92E-2 8.58E-1 30 noble gases, or alpha)
- 2. Average diluted concentration pCiimi 7.09E-9 1.48E-7 during period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % 0.29 8.58 B. Tritium Ci 9.36E-1 1.47E+1 30
- 1. Total release
- 2. Average diluted concentration pCi/mi during period 2.27E-7 2.53E-6
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % 2.27 25.30 C. Dissolved and entrained gases Ci 1.97E-3 1.43E-3 40 l
- 1. Total release
- 2. Average diluted concentration pCilml 4.78E-10 2.46E-10 aming period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % l D. Grass alpha radioactivity Ci l 41.11E-4 l 4.1.42E-3 l 40 l l 1. Total release l E. Volume ofivaste released sprior liters 4.09E+5 1.80E+6 20 to dilutioni F. Volume of dilution water used liters 4.12E+9 5.81E+9 20 during penod 6
._- w.
TABLE 2B EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT (1983)
LIQUID EFFLUENTS JULY - DECEMBER 1983 CONTINUOUS MODE BATCH MODE Nuclides Released Unit Guarter Quarter Quarter 3 Quarter 4 '
strontium-89 Ci 4 2.62E-5 . 3.87E-2 Ci 4.71E-5 l 5.29E-3 strontium-90 cesium 134 Ci 9.28E-5 2.01E-4 Ci 1.56E-3 6.59E-3 cesium 137 iodine-131 Ci 2.91E-5 5.82E-5 cobalt-58 Ci 1.59E-3 2.61E-3 Ci 9.31E-3 5.72E-2 cobalt-60 iron-59 Ci 2:00E-4 l 1.55E-3 Ci 8.56E-5 1.49E-3 zine-65 .
Ci '
1.27E-3 7.25E-3 mananese-54 9.36E-4 l 4.48E-3 chromium-51 Ci arconim'im-niobium 95 Ci 4.33E-6 1.73E 4 molybdenum 99-C 2.23E-5 -
techneuum 99m
~
.Ci 3.95E-5 1.82E-4 banum-lanthanum-140 cerium-141 Ci 7 E7E-5 1.97E-3 1
! 6.44E-5 iodine-133 Ci cenum-144 Ci -
silver 110m Ci 8.29E-3 i 7.04E-1 l Ci i l iron-55 umdentified Ci l l 5.6SE-3 ! 2.59E-2 Total for period (aboven Ci 2.92E-2 l 8.58E-1l i
Ci l 3_3RE 4 3.35E-4 xenon-133 Ci 1.63E-3 1.09E-3 ,
menon.135
'7
t TABLE 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOS AL SEMI- ANNUAL REPORT (1983) 1 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS i JULY - DECEMBER 1983 A. SbLIDWASTESRIFFEDOFFSITEFORBUEIALORDISPOSAL. (not irradiated fuel) 6 l"'*"'" "" "c"
" '* TOT ^*'"
- 1. TYPE OF WASTE UNIT EERDE 7.
FERIOD O. Spent resins, filter sludres, m'S 118.23 gjg evaporator bcttoms, etc. Ci 891.933
- b. Dry conpressible vaste, t:3 217.76 1:/n.
contaminated equipment, etc. Ci 0.90127
- c. Irradiated components, n3 u
.la,
./A control rods, etc. Ci 2
- d. Other (Descrite) =' ,.j".
" , j^.
Miscellanecus low-level was*e Ci
, e .
- 2. Eu-- .,.n. m. C-r .n. . ..,J-.
. . --2 .. ,wr. ..c. -. 2. ..C,.:.. . w .. --
(by type of vaste) 5 I(0 ries:
- a. Spent Eesin. Filter S1::d es. Co-60 10..?O if.0.t 0795 Etaperater Ecttc=s, etc. Cc-50 2.351 20.?b700 cc-57 0.000 .00200
,,s u
,Se
- :.. . ? ::C Cs 2.~iC 2 .~o250 Fe-55 1?.;t5 ~_ G 20150 Fe-59 .055 . 6000 I-131 .0:e . c500
. ., t .-v :: v n a _ . 2..-
La-1-0 .15e 1.2120 3a-1-0 .0 o .50 LOO Sr-bo .-a- cc.- c 0 Sr oD .213 1.509 C .
I Sr-91 .00- .21'.00 Tc-90n
~1000
!c co C.000 .002C0 Cn-oS 1.5 0 13. 3000 Mn-5a 2.157 19.235-0 Cr-51 1.905 17.79010 4 :2p-239 .001 .00c00 Ce-1L1 .006 .05500 Eu-103 .001 .00700
- a-2!. .00* .03415 Xe-133 0.00C .00200 TOTALS 100.000 891.93300
.- . . - - . _ . . - . ._.....-....._8A._.- __ . _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
TABLE 3 (continued) t 7 E(Curies)
Dry Compressible Waste Co-60 17.811 0.1606L b.
Co-58 IL.h26 0.13011 Contaminated Ecuir.ent Cs-137 .56L 0.00509 Fe-55 .110 0.00100 Fe-59 9.655 0.0570L I-131 1.109 0.01000 Ba-lho 1.66L 0.01503 2n-65 1.717 0.015LS I:n-Sh 9.111 0.0521h I'b-95 1.227 0.01160 2r o5 .6BL 0.00617 t
Cr-51 L1.S62 0.37"hh t I
TOTAL 100.000 0.90127
- c. 3/A
- d. R/A
- 3. SDLID YASTE DISPOSIT10.7 Tumber of Chir-ents Mede of Mnrrertatien Dertinatien Tractor-Trailer sarnwell, S.C.
35 h, 3READIATED FCIL SEIF:EITS (Dispositicr.)
Eumber of Shir=ents Mode of M nstortatien Destinati n Bone E/A 11/A an mea u. r is . -
n _ . . - . . ~ . . . . . - - - - - . - . - . . . . . - - - ..~ . . .
APPENDIX C - 1982 Soil Survey I'
?
F e
t P
e t
.k l
I P
I.
l!
l1 0
l t
=
l 9 l
C-1 i
k
- i .
(
Results of Boston Edison Inn Situ Gama Spectrometry Soil Analysis for 1982 Introduction In compliance with Bosten Edison's Technical Specifications for radiological in situ gamma spectrometry analyses were performed monitoring at eleven sites of theduring environment, May, Oct'ober and December of 1982. In addition to the gama I
spectrometry, which employs a Ge(Li) "downlooker" detector in accordance with l Reference 1,' measurements were taken with a pressurized ion chamber (PIC) to assess the total . exposure rates, and soil core samples were taken at five of the stations to confirm the in situ results.
- At all elev'iin stations, by far the major contributors torthe exposure rate due to soil were naturally occurring radionuclides and Cs-137, which is a result of fallout from weapons testing. A small amount of Co.60 was present in the soil at one site. These results are sumarized in Tables 1-12, and the original data is on pemanent file at the Environmental Laboratory.
Methodology In situ gamma spectrometry was performed at each of'.the eleven locations, along I
with71E" measurements for comparison. When possible, a soil . sample was also taken for laboratory gama analysis.
In situ gama spectrometry is a convenient and efficient technique used to evalHte the radioactive constituents of the soil. Using assumptions concerning the soil composition and distribution of the radionuclide of interest, the exposure rate and activity concentration of that radionuclide can be calculated. This is
' done .using .the spectrum obtained with an unshielded Ge(Li) detector placed above The the ground, tngether with detector specific parameters such as efficiency.
radionuclides of interest are fallout and plant related fission and activation products, as.well as those which occur naturally. In evaluating the activity j concentration and exposure rate for a given radionuclide, a parameter describing depth distribution, s/o, must be evaluated. For naturally occurring radionuclides a value of zero is assumed, implying no increase or decrease in the concentration with soil depth. For radionuclides present only on the surface, such as those from J
I fresh fallout, a value of infinity is used. (This value is also used for calculations of apparent activity concentrations and exposure rates for those radionuclides not found during the peak search.) For iian-made radionuclides found l
in the soil and not believed to be recently deposited, an expatential distribution is assumed with s/o = .206. This value is a good compromise between deep 1
distribution and surface deposition; and laboratory analysis usually confirms that these radionuclides are present througout the first six inches of soil implying a
{ period of migration. This procedure of in, situ gamma spectrometry is explaineu in detail in Reference 2.
I i I
f a
t g
- +% m_ --o n.; , , . - . . - - . - - _ _ __
The PIC measurement, which includes all components of the exposure rate, not just terrestrial, is used to evaluate how much of the total exposure rate can be explained by the in situ results together with the cosmic contribution. At control
!! stations, away frisiii the plant's influence, the PIC measurement is used to check the t'
in situ results, as one would expect the terrestrial exposure rate, calculated Ts'ing the in-situ methodology, together with the cosmic contribution to closely
~
3 approximate th"iiTIC results.
- 'j When possible soil core samples are also taken and analyzed at the laboratory to confirm the presence or absence of radionuclides in the soil which have been identified in the in situ analysis. In this way, the source term is identified as ll soil or unknown. Tii the latter case, the in situ calculations are not valid and is results are not reported. In addition, anliTysis of the different core sections aids in defining the depth distribution of the radionuclide.
I f i,
Results Tables 1-11 contain the results from the in situ gama analysis for the eleven si tes. (It should tie noted that in August thTGWe) detector was repaired to remedy increasingly poor resolution. The poor resolution was not a problem in the measurements conducted during May; and prior to analysis of the remaining .three sites, the operating characteristics of the detector were carefully checked with the result that recalibration following the re' pair was dee'ned unnecessary for in sita analysis (Reference 3).) Each table lists the apparent exposure rate anF actTvity concentration for each of thirteen fission and activation . products, as well as for three naturally occurring radionuclides. LLD values were not calculated for nuclides with more than one peak, as in these cases all of the peaks i
found were used to calculate the total exposure rate and activity concentration for i that nuclide (or series). Table 12 contains all positive -in situ results :as well as PIC measurements for comparison.
, With two exceptions, all exposure rates due to activity within the soil are 8
more than 95 percent resul ting from natural radiation. The remainder is almost entirely due to Cs-137 which is considered to be a result'of weapons testing and is found throughout the environment. The first exception is high Cs-137 concentration
. at site 10, resulting in 17 percent of the. total exposure rate due:to soil. The activity concentration for Cs-137 at this site is greater than five . times the average value for the other stations. The most probable explanation for this is that the detector may have been placed over a local accumulation point of debris, and therefore the fallout related Cs-137 was present in a higher than average concentration. It should be noted that sites considerably closer to the plant
- showed only typical environmental levels of Cs-137, and the high concentration is therefore not likely to be plant related. The second case in which the exposure rate due to soil was more than 5 percent related to fission or activation products,
? was at station 7 where Co-60 was identified during in situ analysis, and confirmed i by Laboratory soil analysis. The activity concentrat' ion was calculated to be 305*7 pCi/kg, assuming a value for a/o equal to -.206, while Laboratory analysis i resulted in a value of 224*13 pCi/kg. The value for a/o is likely .to be greater l than .206, i.e. the distribution of Co-60 was more planar, as it was not found in the 2"-4" core section. This increase in m/c would result in a lower value for
, activity concentration more in line with the Laboratory results. In any case, the
- exposure rate due to Co-60 was calculated to be less than 1 uR/hr.
l 4
- - - - . . . , . , c,.-,_-,..._--,.--_,,,,.,--_,,-,.--,,.+.,,,.n.,n_,- ...-,,,,.__m_n.+__
Cobolt-60 was identified at three additional sites, but could not be confirmed by Laboratory soil analysis (there was no core sample submitted for site 00). As the source term was therefore unknown for these sites, the exposure rates which were calculated assuming soil to be the source term, are not valid and were not listed in Table 12. It should also be noted that Zr-95 was detected at two sites at levels at or below LLD, but these results could not be confirmed by soil analysis at the Laboratory.
The PIC measurements agreed well with the in situ results, when a cosmic component of 3.6 uR/hr (Reference 4) was added! with a few notable exceptions.
Sites 00, 07 and 08 showed relatively high PIC measurements which could not be explained with the Ge(Li) results. These sites are all within 0.15 miles of the l
plant so that the higher than background exposure rates were most likely a result
.of.some source term other than soil.
?
9 8 e OO 4
4 s
I I
t a
References l
i
(
(1) YAEL Procedure Number 510. Rev.1, " Identification and Quantitative i
Determination of Radionuclides in Soil by Gamma-Ray in-Situ Spectrometry."
4 1
(2) HASL-258, "In-Situ Ge(Li) hnd NaI(T1) Ganna-Ray Spectrometry," September 1972.
t (3) YAEL Memo ELS.265/82 " Intrinsic Efficiency Check on Ge(Li) Detector No.1."
(4) " Cosmic-Ray Ionization in the Lower Atmosphere," Wayne M. Londer and Harold Beck, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol.17, No.19, October 1,1966.
4 I
I e
! e a
9
'o e
. TABLE 1 LOCATION: WAREHOUSE Il LOCATION #: 00 COUNT TIME: 6000sec il
.! COUN1 DATE: 05/27/82 ir InSitu COUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID EXPOSURE RATE CONCENTR ATION nicr o R/hr picoCi/Kgran NAME ' EXPOSURE +-1-SIGMA LLD CONC &- 1-SIGMA LLD RATE Ce-144 (-224- 15) E-4 53L-4 (-1004- 68) EO 240E D Ce-141 ( 3&- 13) E-4 47E-4 ( 3+- 14) Eo SOE O 1-131 ( 9+- 34) E-4 120E-4 ( 124- 46).E-1 160E-1 Ub-125 ( 1&- 11) E-3 42C-3 ( 1+- 13).E O 47E D Ru-103 ( 47+- 40) E-4 140E-4 ( 4S4- 3D) E-1 140 E-1 Da -14 0 ( 23+- $7) E-4 200E-4 ( 7+ .13) E o 40E D Ro -106 (-2+- 13) E-3 47E-3 (-U+- 20) .E D 100E D
- ** M-40 ( 2714+- JU) E-3 61E-3 ( 1516+- 21).E 1 34E 1
- 4 Th-232 ( 21384- 63) E-3 -----
( 7504- 22) Eo -----
- E& U-230 ( 130$+- 40) 1.?-3 ---
{ 761+- 26) EU -----
Notes: ~
- Ac ti vit y greater than 3* standard deviation
+ Peak is found LLD is not calculated i
st e
T f
- Oam.emerg egge we esw em . 6 e*
- e
,,3._ _m y 1 -*****+-pq e*
TABLE 2 i
LOCATION: R OCKY HILL R D .
LOCATION #: 01
?
! 6000sec COUNT TIME:
COUNT DATE: 05/27/82 InSitu C,0UNTING RESULTS EXPOSURE RATE CONCENTRATIDN NUCLIDE ID piceCi/Kgran nice o R /hr i
LLD CONC +- 1-SIGMA LLD NAMC EXi'OSUR E &-1-SIGM A RATE 330E-5 (-13+- 43) EO 1b0C 0 Ce-144 (-20+- Y6) C- 5 ( -35+ V2 ) E-1 320E-1 Ce - 141 (-32+- 06) E--S J00E-5
( - 1 ~/ 4 - 34) E-1 120 E- 1
(-13+- 23) E-4 SDE-4 I -1 31 320E-4 ( 19+- 10) EO 34E D a
Sb -125 ( 164?- 8'7) E-4 14+- 27) E-1 110E-1 Ru-103 ( 154 - 31) E-4 110E-4 (
3VE O
( 31+- 44) E-4 170E-4 ( 75- 11) EO Lia -14 0 ( 12+ - 23) EO 82C D
( 68- 10) E-3 3DL -3 i Ru-106
( 1630+- 74) C- 4 230E-4 ( 2'? 6+- 14) EO 41E O Et Cs-137 ( 654- 30) E-1 130E-1 2r-96 ( 121+- 71) E-4 250E-4
(-16+- 22) E-1 77E-1
<-31-s- 40) E- 4 150E -4 Nb-Y5 ISUE-4 ( 36+- IV) E-1 6DC-1 Mn -54 ( 70+- 43) E4 ( 3 '7 +- 15) E-1 sue-1 Co-40 ( 30s- 11) E-J 40E 3
( 74 - 13) E-1 40C-1
( 54 - 10) E- 3 30D-3
- +
La-140 K-40 ( 22124- 34) EJ 4VE-3 ( 123b+- 19) E1 2/E 1 x4 Th-232 ( 2252+- 50) E-3 - - - - - ( 7??+- 21) ED -
- + U-230 ( 1346+ - 41 ) E -J ----- ( 740+- 23) EO - - - -
l No tes:
x- Ac t iv it y greater than 3*ctandard deviation
+ Peak is (*oond
- - - - 1.LD in not calculated 8
t e
4
TABLE 3 l
- LOCATION: ROCKY HILL RD. (W)
LOCATION 4: 03 5
l' -
COUNT TIME: 6000sec COUNT DATE: 12/15/82 InGit u COUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID EXPOSURE R A TE CONCENTR ATION nice o R/hr picoCi/Kgran NAME EXPOGURE+-1-SIGMA LLD CONC +- 1-SIGM A LLD RATE
.Ce-144 (-104- 12) E-4 43E-4 (-43+- 53) ED 190E O Ce-141 ( 0+- 11 ) E-4 30E-4 ( B+- 11) EO 41E O I- 1 31 (-24 4 -- 31) E-4 110E-4 (-33t- 42).E-1 ISUE-1 Sb-125 ( 27+- V4) E-4 34 0 E -4 ( 3+- 11 ) 'E O 3?E O Ru-103 (-554 - 33) E-4 120E-4 (-524- 32).E-1 120E-1 Da-140 (-47+- 47) E -4 10 0 E- 4 ( - 1 1 + -- 11) E O 41E O
, Ru -106 ( -2 + -- 11) E-3 40E-3 (-4+- 24) EO EiVE D c+ Cs-137 ( 613+- 55) E-4 16 0 E -4 ( 1 123 +- 100) E-1 2Y0E-1
. Ir-?S ( 424- 73) E-4 260E-4 ( 23+- 40).E-1 140E-1 Nb-70 (-Y+- 42) E- 4 12 0 E-4 (--12+- $3) E-1 ISUE-1 Mn-54 ( 1004- 45) E-4 160E-4 ( 45+- 20) E-1 7,11i- 1 Co-6D ( 24+- 12) E-3 44E-3 ( 31+- 16) E-1 S6E-1 La-149 ( 1?+- 11) E-3 30E-3 ( 254- 14) E-1 4YE-1 C+ K-40 ( 2474+- 35) E-3 44E-3 ( 1373+- 20) E 1 24E 1 e4 Th-232 ( 247 0 +- 57 ) E-3 - - - - -
( D76+- 20) EO - - - - - -
0+ U-230 ( 1170*- 35) 6-3 - - - - -
( 643+- 17) E O - - - - - -
1 Notes:
l- e Activity greater than 3* standard deviation
+ Peak is Yound g LLD is not calculated f
t -
4 e
6
i I
TABLE 4 i
I j .LDCATIDN: PLY. CENTER LOCATIDNS: 94 I
i COUNT . TIME: 600Bsec
~
. C D U N'I .E A T E : .Ja/07/82 InSitu COUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID .EXPUSUl(E RATE CONCENTR A TIDN nicroR/hr picoCi/Karan NAME EXPOSURE +-1-SIGMA LLD CONC +- 1-SIGMA LLD
'R ATE Ce-144 (-5+- 12) E-4 -43E-4 (-22+- 53) ED 190C D Ce-141 ( 17+- 10) E-4 37 E-4 ( 10+- 11) EO 40E D I - 1 31 (-564- - 31 ) C-4 110E-4 (-76+- 43):E-1 160E-1 Sb-125 ( 5+- V6) E-4 .350E-4 ( 1+- 11 ) E o 3?E O I
R u -103 ( -224 - 34) E-4 120E-4 (-21+- 32 ) ~ E- I 120E-1 3a-140 (-1?+- 4V ) E-4 100E-4 (-4+- 11) EO 41E D Ru -106 (-6+- 11 ) E-3 40E-3 (-144- 24) EO BYE D
. *+ Cs-137 _
( 2763&- 74) E-4 160 E-4 ( 502+- 14) C0 40E O
'Ir-YS -
( .10+- 75 ) E-4 270E-4 ( 5+- 40)~E-1 150C-1
, Nb-75 (-164e- 46) E4 .170E-4 ( -8 4 +- 23) E-1 80E-1 Mn-54 (-4S+ .60) E -4 210E-4 (-50+- 6*/).E-1 240E-1 Co-60 (-3+ 127 E-3 45 E-3 (-4+- 15 ) . E-1 SUE-1 La -140 (-13 +- 14 ) E -3 52E-3 (-41+ -43) E-1 16 0 E-1
'i *+ X-40 (.2382+- 34) E-3 -43E-3 ( IJ31+- 19).E 1 24E 1 I *4 Th-232 (.2414+- Sb).E 3 ( B564- 19).E D --
- + U-238 ( 15714- 39) E-J -----
( 863+- 21) ED --
l Notes:
- Ac tivity greater than 3Ks1andard deviation
'[ + Peak is found LLD . is n o t calculated t
h i
i
m
?
4 ,
a t
t TABLE 5 i
{ LOCATION: PROPERTY LINE t
LOCATION # 06 I
COUNT TIME:,
6000sec 4
, COUNT DATE: 05/26/82 InSitu COUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID EXPOSURE RATE CONCENTRATION nicr o R/hr picoCi/Kgran NAME EXPOSURE +-1-SIGMA LLD CONC +- 1-SIGMA LLD RALE Ce-144 ( 4+- 12) E-4 43E-4 ( 16+- 54) ED 190E D Ce-141 (-8+- 11) E-4 3VE-4 (-8+- 11) E D 42E D I-131 ( 25+- 31) E-4 110E-4 ( 344- 42) E-1 150E-1
.i Sb-125 ( 210+- V5) E-4 340E-4 ( 25+- 11) EO 30E D I Ru-103 ( 38+- 32) E-4 120 E-4 ( 36+- 31) E-1 110E-1
= Ba-140 (-3 4 +- 47 ) E-4 170E-4 (-0+- 11) EO 40E D R u -106 ( 15+- 11) E-3 39E-3 ( 334- 24) EO BSE D
- I #4 K-40 ( 2100+- 34) E-3 54 E-3 ( 1178+ 17) E 1 30E 1
!' *+ Th-232 ( 2320+- 60) E-3 -----
( 8234- 21) ED l *+ U-230 ( 12V5+- 42) E-3 - - - - -
( 712+- 23 ) Eo - - - - -
Notes:
- Ac tivity greater than 3* standard deviation 1 + Peak is found LLD is. n ot calculated I
i e
G I
4
--~ ~----~ -- - --
--_.___. _ _.. . . _ _ - - - - . - - - .- n TABLE 6 LOCATION: PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
, LOCATION 4: 07 8
i COUNT TIME: 6000sec COUN1, DATE: 05/26/82 InSit u COUNTING RESUL TG NUCLIDE.ID EXPOSURE R ATE CONCENTRATION nic r o R /hr picoCi/ Koran NAME EXP03URE+-1-SICMA LLD CONC +- 1-SIGMA LLD RATE Ce-144 ( 5+- 15) E-4 52E ( 234- 67) EO 230E D Ce-141 (-10+- 13) E-4 46E-4 (-11+- 14) E O SUE D I--131 ( 4B+- 35) E-4 120E-4 ( 65+- 47) E-1 160 E-1
.Sb-125 ( 28+- 12) E-3 42E-3 ( 32+- 13) E O 4GE D R u-103 ( 37+- 40) E-4 140E-4 ('35+- 30) E-1 140E-1 Da-140 ( 4 0 +-- 57) E-4 210E-4 ( 9+- 14) E .0 SOE U
- i
~
R u-106 - ( 14+- 13) E-3 47E-3 ( 31+- 29) EO 100E 0
., *+ Cs-137 ( 1133+- 00) E-4 250E-4 ( 206+- 14) E O 46E O m 2r-95 ( 200+- 00) E-4 310E-4 ( 151+- 48) E-1 170E-1 Nb-75 ( 70 +- 52 ) E-4 100E-4 ( 40+- 27) E -I VSE-1 fin -54 ( 61+- 55) E-4 .200E-4 ( 20+- 25) E-1 VUE-1
~
.La-140 (-17+- 11) E-3 41E-3 (-214- 14) E-1 52E-1
( 7D4+- 22) ED -----
g *+ 11-238 ( 1267+- 46) E-3 -----
( 696+- 25) ED - - =
V Notes:
I
- Ac tivity ' greater than 3* standard deviation
+ Peak is found LLD is not. calculated 1
(
I I
4 6
TABLE 7 i LOCATION: DVERLOOK LOCATION #1 08 i . COUNT tit 1E 6000sec COUNT DATE:. 05/26/B2 JnSitu EDUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID , EXPOSURE R ATE CONCENTRATION nicreR/hr picoCi/Kgran NAME . EXPOSURE +-1-SIGMA LLD Cd.NC +- 1-SIGMA LLD RATE Ce-1 (-254- 21 ) E-4 170L-4 (-111+- 96) ED 300E D Ce-141 (-13+- 19) E-4 69E-4 (-2 0 + . 2 0 ) EO 74E O I-131 (-46+- 51) E-4 .100E-4 (-64+- 70) E-1 250 E-1 Sb-125 ( 11+- 15) E-3 S4E-3 ( 12+- .17 ) EO 61E O Ru-103 (-56+- 54) E-4 190E-4 (-53 + . 51 ) E-1 190E-1
, Ba-140 (-6+- 75) E-4 .270E-4 (-1+- 17) EO 6dE O Ru-106 ( -254 - 17) E-3 63E-3 (-55+ ~30) ED 140E O i
', *+ Cs-137 ( 1931+- 89) E-4 280E-4 ( 177+-- 16 ) Eo SIE O 2r-95 ( 0+- 11 ) E-3 41E-3 C 434- 61):E-1 220E-1 Nb '/5 (-65+- 67) E-4 24 0 E-4 (-34+ 35) E-1 130E-1 Hn-54 (.B0+- 99) E-4 350E-4 ( 9+- 11) ED 3?E o
,j W+ K-40 ( 2609+- 41) E-3 91 E-3 ( 145B+- .23 ) E1 51 E 1.
- + U-238 ( 1210+- 55) E-3 - - - - ( 665&- :30 ) Eo Notes:
., # Ac tivity greater than Justaridard deviation i + Peak is found LLD is not caleviated r
i 0
9
i i
TABLE 8
! LOCATION: EAST' BREAKWATER i ' '
LOCATIONS: 09 COUNT . TIME: 6000 set
> COUNT DATE: 03/27/82 s
InSit u COUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID EXPOSURE R ATE CONCENTR A TION nicr o R/h r picaCi/ Koran NAME EXPOSURE +-1-SIGMA LLD CONC +- 1-SIGMA LLD RATE Ce-144 ( 64 - 12) E-4 43E-4 C.27+- 54).E D 190E D Ce-141
( 12+- 11 ) E-4 30E-4 ( 13+- 11) EO 41E D I -131 (-17+- 31) E-4 110E-4 (-23+- 42 ) .E-1 150E-1
(-31+- 95) E-4 350E-4 (-3+- II ) Eo 3VE O Sb-125 Ru-103 ( 39+- 34) E-4 120E-4 ( 37+- 32) E-1 11UE-1
( 50+- 47) E-4 luuE-4 ( 12+- 11) EO 41E D Ba-140
' R u -10 6 ( 14- 11) E-3 41E-3 ( 3+- 25) ED DVE D
( 1000+- 67) E-4 210E-4 ( 132+- 13) EO 3VE O
- & Cs-137 i
( U +- 11 ) E-3 40E-3 (-1+- 14) E-1 51E-1 La-140 u+ K-40 ( 2766+- 30 ) E-3 57E-3 ( 1345+- 21 ) .E 1 32E 1 ili * ( B75+- 22) :E D -----
- + Th-232 ( 2467+- 63) E-3 -
- + U-238 ( 1357+- 4 4 ) E -3 -- ( 746+- 24) Eo -
D Notes:
- Activity greater than 3* standard deviation
& Peak is found
LLD ir, not calculated I
i I
i
'j .
TABLE 9
(
M LOCATION: CLEFT ROCK LOCATION #: 10
.[
COUNT TIME: 6000 sec COUNT DATE: 05/28/82 InSit u COUNTING RESULTS t
NUCLIDE ID EXPOSURE R ATE CONCENTR ATION nicroR/hr picoCi/Kgran NAME EXPOSURE +-1-SIGMA LLD CONC +- 1-SICMA ~LLD RATE Ce-144 ( 95+- 99) E-5 340E-5 ( 43+- 44 ) EO 1SOE o Ce-141 ( D6+- 80) E-5 310E-5 ( 92+- ?$) E-1 330E-1
. 1-131 ( 23+- 27) E-4 92E-4 ( 31+ .36) E-1 130E-1 Ub-125 ( 108+- 96) E-4 350E-4 ( 12+- II) Eo 39E O Ru-103 ( 26+- 33) E-4 120E-4 ( 254- 31) E-1 110E-1 Da-140 (-5+- 47) E-4 170E-4 (-1+- 11) EO 40E O R u-10 6 ( 284 - 11) E-3 37E-3 ( 61+- 23) EO 82E O
. Co-60 ( 19+- 11) E-3 41 E-3 ( 24+- 15) E-1 53E-1
}
La-140 (-56+- 96 ) E-4 360E-4 ( 12) E-1 46E-1
- Th-232 ( 1952+- 55) E-3 --
( 692+- 20) EO -----
i *+ U-230 ( 919+- 37) E-3 -- ( 5 0 5+- 21 ) E O -----
1 Notes:
- Activity greater than 3* standard deviation
+ Peak is found e LLD is not calculated I
k -
l 1
t TABLE 10 l . . . . _ _ _ .
LOCATION: EAST WEYMOUTH LOCATION #: 15 COUNT' TIME: 6000sec 1
COUNT DATE: 19/07/82 InSitv COUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID EXPOSURE R ATE CONCENTR A TION nicr o R/hr picoCi/Kntan
' NAME' .EXPOGURE+-1-SIGMA LL1) CONC +- 1-0fGMA LLD RATE Ce-144 ( :12) E-4 43E-4 (-3V+- 54) EO 190E O Ce-141 ( 0*- 11) E-4 30E-4 ( 0+- 11) E O 41E O I-1 31 (-52+-~32) E-4 120E-4 (-714- 43) E-1 16 0 E-1 Sh-125 ( 274 +-- 76 ) E-4 340E-4 ( 31+- 11) EO 3?E O Ru-103 ( 34 ) . E- 4 120E-4 (-4+- 23) E-1 120E-1 Ba-140 ( 10 +- 4V ) . E-4 200E-4 ( - 4 +- 12) E D 42E O
' R e-- 106 ( 0+- 12).E-3 42E-3 ( 1+- 25) EO v2C D
- + Cs-137 C.2726+- 02) E-4 220E-4 ( 476+- 15) E O .' ,7E O 2r-95 ( 17 0+- 74 ) _ E- 4 260E-4 ( 92+- 40) E-1 140E-1 Mb-95 (-3O+- 47) E-4 .17 0 E-4 (- 19+- 24 ) E- 1 07E-1 ttn--54 ( 12?+- 46) :E-4 160E-4 ( 59+- 21) E-1 7 31.-1 Co-60 (-0+- 13) E-3 47E-3 (-10+- 17) E-1 6.5 E- 1 La-140 ( 25- - 10 ) .E-3 36E-3 ( 32+- 13) E-1 460-1 l 40E-3 ( 1600+- 22) E 1 27E 1
- + K-40 ( 3007+- J7) E- 3
- + Tti-232 ( 2570+- 60)'.E-3 --- ( 9114- 21) EO - - - - - -
! #+.U-238 ( 143S+- 30) E-3 - -
( 700+- 21) EO ---
4 Notes:
}
. *# Activity greater than 3* standard devia tion
-+ Pea k is f o und LLD ir, not. calc ulated
{
(
e
9 i -
I t TABLE 11
~
LOCATION: MANOMET.SUB ST,A.
8 LOCATIDNo: 17 COUNT TIME: 6000sec COUNT'DATE: 05/28/82 InSitv COUNTING RESULTS NUCLIDE ID EXPOSURE RATE CONCENTRATION
' nicroR/hr picaCi/Kg ran NAME EXPOSURE +-1-SIGNA LLD CONC +- 1-SIGMA LLD RATE Ce-144 ( 624- 93)~E-5 320E-5 ( 2D+- 42) E O 15DE D Ce-141 ( 136+- 84) E-5 . 2'7 0 E-5 ( 146+- 90) E-1 310E-1 1-131 ( 14+- 24) E-4 CSE-4 ( 19+- 33) E-1 120E-1 Sb-125 (-102+- 89) E-4 320EM (-12+- 10) EO 37E D Ru-103 ( 10+-~31) E-4 110E-4 ( 10+- 29) E-1 110E-1 Ba-140 ( -51 +- 4 5 ) E-4 170E-4 (-12+- 11) EO 39E D Ru-106 ( 21+- 10) E-3 36E-3 ( 45+- 22).E D 79E O
,i <+ Cs-137 ( 2123+- 64) E-4 43E-4 ( 387+- 12) ED 7.8E D ji Z.--9 5 ( 111+- 67) E-4 .240E-4 ( 60+- 36) E-1 130E-1 r Nb-95 (-38+- 40) E-4 14OE-4 (-20+- 20) E-1 74E-1
.( 784+- 20) ED -
I *+ U-230 ( 1200+~ 3Y) E-3 -- ( 703+- 21) E8 - - - -
l 1 " Notes:
- Ac tivit y greater than 3* standard deviation
+ Pea k is f ound
} -- -
LLD ir. not calculated I
i i
rv , , , , - . , -- , - p -,,,n.-n .--s,,,e., ,,----,,--,e.-,-.-,m,
_ .. - - - ~ - - , , -
,i i
! TABLE 12 j
. t
!- 1982 In Situ Results "
Comparison of Ge(Lf) li_i Tilii and Ion Chamber Results 1
j Location Positive Ge(L1) In Situ Results (uR/Hr) .
- I
) 00 Warehouse (0.03 $$E) 1.38 2.14 2.71 0.156 -
(a) 10.7 13.8 01 Rockyhill Rd. (E) (0.8 SE) 1.35 2.25 't.21 0.163 -
9.6 9.4 03 Rockyhill Rd. (W) (0.3 WNW) 1.17 2.47 2.49 'O.062 - 9.8 9.8
- 04 Plymoth Center (4.5 WW) 1.57 2.41 2.36 0.276 -
10.2 9.9 i
l 06 Property Line (0.34 NW) 1.30 2.32 2.11 0.189 (a) . 9.5 10.5 l $*
j 07 Pedestrial Bridge (0.14 N) 1.27 2.21 2.14 0.113 .989 (bc) 10.3 13.8 1 ,
1 08 Overlook (0.03 W) 1.21 2.05 2.61 0.108 (a) 9.6 37.8 9 i 09 East Breakwater (0.35 ESE) 1.36 2.47 2.77 0.100 (c) 10.3 10.4 ,
! l
! 10 Cleft Rock (0.9 S) 0.02 1.95 1.68 0.942 - 9.1 9.4 1
15 East Weynoth (23 W) 1.44 2.57 3.01 0.273 -
10.9 10.5 17 Manomet substation (2.5 SE) 1.28 2.21 2.03 0.213 - 9.3 9.3 o l-i! (a) Total includes Co-60 found in in situ 3.6butmR/Hr cosmic not confirmed contribution.
by lab soil _ analysis and therefore not included in total. l j ((b) l-
! c) Cs-60 found in Zr-95 found in ,T._n Tii sTEii situand but confirmed not confirmed by lab by soillab analysis.
soil analysis and therefore not included in total. i
~
i
)
- n. - . . . . . . . - - - - - - -
.i
}
APPENDIX D - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 4
o h
f' I.
t a
t i
- e *
,e m.
e
'I
- t b
.i t
i t
4 l.
~D-1 9
f
. APPENDIX D f
! 4.8.D anvironmental Monitorina Pronras An environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as follows:
- 1. Environmental samples shall be selected and analyzed according to .
yable 4.8.1 at the locations described in yables 4.8.2 and 4.8.3 and
. shown in figures 4.8.1, 4.8.2 and 4.8.3.
[
t
- 1. Analysisal techniques used shall be sack that the detection capabilities ~
in Tabla 4.8.4 are achieved.
l h -
- 3. A senses of gardens produc.ing fresh' leafy vegetables for human consump-tian (e.g., lettuce, spinach, etc.) shall be conducted near the end of
' the growins season to deteswine or verify the location'of the sarden (assilable for sampling) yielding the highest calculated thyroid dose.
This sensus is limited to gardens having an area of 500 square feet or more and shall be conducted under the fallowing conditions as necessary to.neet the above requirements t
- a. Within a 1-eila radius of the plant site, soumeration by a door-to-
- door, or equivalast causting tech =4T=.
- b. If so milk ,.._ ' '--g animals are lossted ta the vicinity of the site, as determined by ites A below..the census described in item
- 3a shove shall be estanded as a distance of 5 miles from the site.
i.
If:the sensus indientes the existence af a garden at a location ytalding a anlamisted thyroid dose greater than that from the previously sampled
- garden, the new Iscation shall Tuplace the garden previously having the
- ==w4== --1a=1=ted todine saecentration. Also, any location from which fresh lasfy vegetables can no longer be obtained asy be dropped from the g
sutweillanca program as less as the NRC is notified in writing, as soon
- as;po==4hta that auchwegetables are ao longer stown er ao longer
- available at ther 1mene4an.
A. A sensus of ==4==1= pendus133 milk for human consumption shall be conducted stcer amar the utddle:af the 7 ag 4 season to determine or verify the i
Isostion yielding the: highest calculated. annual average thyroid does.
' The camsus shall be amaduated e der.the following conditions as necessary to;ases the aboom requirement:
I a.- Within a 1-edle udius from:the visst site or within the 15 aren/yr isodose line, whichever is larger, sammeratism by a door-to-door or
' .equivalset. sounting *=eh=49=.
- h. V1-kin a 3 eile Tadius for seus.and for goats, enumeration derived
~
- from referemmed tafov==e4=='from saanty agricultural agents or other f ,
reliable sesenes.
If .it is learned from;this sensus that ==4==1s are present at a location which yields a amiculated. thyroid dose greater than from previously sampled animals, the new location shall .be added to the surmillance program as
-=1e 1=ced l
g
- seen as practicable.11he sampling location havie. .w louest
- dose any them be dropped free the surveillance program at the end of the grazing seasse during shish the seness was conducted. Also, any location
' fram whiah milk ama as longer he obtained any be: dropped from the survell-O D-1
'T. -
?
g lance program es long as ths FRC is notified is writing, as seen as ilk .
practicable, that.ailk-producing asiania are no longer yrssant, er a lf samples are no longer available at that laea*4
] } .
t s=====1 unavail-
- y S. Deviations are permitted from the required 2n the samplin
, ability or to malfunction of autoestic sampling equipumat.
?. event of equipment am1 function, every ' reasonable effort shall be ande -
- to complete corrective action prior to the and of the m period. .
- l ~ be amplained in the assual report.
- 4. Detailed written procedures. 4=d4=5 a=14~M=- check lists and I
instructions, sha n be prepared and folloued for all activities involved in carrying out the environmental annitorias program.
Procedures shan include sampling, u_f data recording and s taken when anomalous asasurements are 44 -
Procedures shall be prepareit for insering the goalityeef presumaThese procedu results. including analytical measurements.
identify the responsible organizatises, include ,w-? n ' se (such as participation in IAEA der NBS interraithne4m eaBreises (e.t..
and submission of " blind" esaliev eentrol --lee for analvees be t contractorsM to identify anal correct def94==efes. investiasta anomalous I er suspect results, and zuview.and esalusta pragzam zoomits.amd reports.
Environmental U terina premram 1
,. g 3.8.3 and 4.S.3 .
+ Q @/
,,Vs s#
IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3)
///jg/j Y [,pN.gg/
\g7/o//7)yge 'g@[*g//
k+7777 ,,
+ %
l.0 'Sm 2E g ;; L=
i,i [8: HM lli 1.25 1.4 1.6 4 150mm >
< 6" >
k%
<>ri 4 ,%,////
/A
, er a%p /
v ///
<>M M O
i e
E _
a
The 200 pCi/Kgm r:dioccoium "cetirn lev:1* is based on eciculations which i,
. - --- showed that if r:diocccium from picat ralcacco rccched thio Icvel, Tha plutonium could possibly appear at levels. of potential interact.*
esiculactens also showed that the dose delivered from these levels of plutonium would not be a significant portion of the total dose attributable to liquid effluents.
The program was also designed to be consistent, wherever applicable with ,
Regulatory Guide 4.3 (Issued for comment December 1975). The following ,
exceptions to the generic recommendations stated in Regulatory Guide 4.8 i
are justified due to site specific considerations:
- 1. m required detection capability for I-131 in milk 'is about twice the value suggested in Regulatory Guide 4.8. The justi-h
' fication for the bisher value is presented in the second paragraph of this section. This is a conservative estiaste of the capability -
of thq milk surveillance program to detect concentrations at the appropriate annual dose level since the annual dose is p a portional to the annual averste concentration in silk. The detection limit for a group of samples is less than that for a single sample and is inversely proportional to the square root of the number of samples. The conser-vatism in this case is approximately allT, or about a factor of J.
- 2. Air particulates are not analyzed for radiostrontium.
The program instead calls for this analysis in milk sangles. This is justified because the air-cow-milk exposure pathway can be better non-itored at Pilgrim after the very low level selaases of radiostrane4i-ste reconcentrated in cow's milk (Inf. 1).
- 3. Sails and sediments are not routinely analysed for Sr-90, but rather the analysis is done se a contingency basis. h rationale behind this
' is that gr-90 will not contr h ts to long-term radionne14d= % %
- until the more abi=d==e gamma sandsting nuclides appear in relatively large concentrations. Both Items 2 and 3 refleet the fact that in 31s
+ years of operation, Pilgria Station liquid releases of Sr-90 have amounted to only 1/1000 of the Sr-90 inventory in Cape Cod Bay water -
(from weapons testing fallout) and about 4/1000,000 of the direct deposi-tian on the Bay. Also, gaseous releases of Sr-90 have been only 1/200,000 of the terrestrial Sr-90 inventary within five =f1== of the station (Ref.1).
,r.-v. late l: 4. Sarveys are conducted annually, if necessary, to determina
- ' locations for asapling of leafy vegetables and milk. The objective of these surveys is to ensure that the environmental samples are represen-tative of realistic food chain pathways, considering local conditions.
Results of the monitoring program will be used as "beschestks" to verify calculational models used to predict the consequences of affluent releases from the station. The models can then be engloyed to predict doses attributable to radiation deposition at any other location of interest.
The combination of monitoring results and calculationsalmodel predictions is a practical method of demonstrating compliance with 10CTR50 Appendix I.
This approach does not require (nor is it always practical) that environ-asetal media always be sampled from the " worst case" locations: although sensitivity of the monitoring results might be improved by sampling free locations which are reasonably close to "morst case" conditisms.
<t 1
- in amasurable quantities having a potential dose (human food chain)
,i sign 4He==e= comparabia .to other nuclides if present at their detection limits.
I g
g
6 , .
1 l Verificatism of the sopropriate milk sampling locations on an annual i basis is satisfactory as there are very few locations suitable for the
.g- grazing of dairy herds in the vicinity of the plant (gaf. 2). This i
- situation askas it unlikely the location of the nearest dairy herd (3.5.ailes-U) will change.
- 3. Annus1 ---14=g of beef forage (in place of beef) is adequate because .
beef cattle are not raised commercially to the vicinity of the site.
. However, dairy cows from the Plymouth County Farm are periodically sold .
for beef. Feed (hay) from this location will be sampled to monitor this potential pathuey for ingestion of radioactivity. If beef cattle feeding
~
sa local forage are found'at locations closer .to the site, forage i samples from the c2aser 1ae=e4a= uill replace zhe sample from the I cammey Yarm.
- 6. Soundueter flow st:the plant site is into Cape Cod Eey; therefore,
_ terrestrial monitoring of groundwater is not.4=e1 Mad in this program.
- 7. Poultry N T14== is not r Im_4 because poultry in ylymouth County feed a2most ancimitusly na imported grain-and are,asually raised under mhaltar.
. B. Tia2d asmana fmi- surveys are-tenducted to sonitor indioactivity in 4o11.1a 11em of 2aboratory analysis of soil semp2as. Se technique has several advantages over laboratory analysis. First, analysis can be
, performed on the same p3st of'3and from survey to survey, and radio-activity bui2d-op at the location.cma be accurately determined. Secondly, gamma suposure Tata is determined dixectly from this technique: hence m '* e with IDCFR50 Appendix I amvela can be. investigated directly zather than dadirectly through sail sampling.
mg k
f l -
s e
i i
- i. t.
l -
M .
__.____.e_.-- . _ _ _ . __.
i 4
. l
References:
t*
- 3. Wrenn, M.E., " Renew of Sr-90 Releases from Pilgrim 1 Nine1==v 71 ant.and l!'
s Comparison with Extant Environmental Lavala", 1976. \
Filgrim Station Unit #2 PSAR, Appendix 117, p.1170-11 and 11A, amended l
, 2.
- l June 15, 1976. .
G l
e l
- e e
e e
e 0
9 e
O O
O O
e 8
t O
e 7
e 0
t ! '
t b5 _
....Q.__..___.. _1 . . _ _ --- -
i T . . . . . . . . _
3, ..
, - - , , ~ ,
~
1 . .
~
TABLE 4.8.1 . ,
OPERATICIIAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRO 10EllTAL MIllTORING PROGilAM ,
- Locations taposure Patinsay (Direction-Distance) Samp11mg and Type and Frequency . .
l of Analysis or Sasele type from Reactor Collection Frequency .
l i AIRE 0 lust .
l' Gross beta radioactivity at Particulates 11(seeTable4.8.2) Continuous sampilne over .
one week , least 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after filter change. (a) Quarterly cesposite .
[bylocation for gamma ;
l 1
1sotopic. () ;
i Continuous sampilng with Analyze weekly for 1-131 l
l
{ -
Radiolodine 11(seeTable4.8.2) tentster collection weekly i
i Soll 11(seeTable4.8.2) Once per three years Fleid genna isotopic. (:)
I DIRECT 20 (see Table 4.8.3) Guarterly Gesem exposure quarterly.
l! Plymouth Beach and *
! Priscilla/ White llorse Beach Annually (spries) Gasme exposure survey, I
WATER 00 Rile continueve composit sample Gamma isotopic (b) monthly; DischadeCanalPond(SE-1.7al.1 Bartle Weekly grab sample and composite for H-3 l . PowderPoint(fusW-7.8al.j(d)Weeklygrabsample analysis quarterly. (c).
i .
AQUATIC . -
- shellfish blschargeoutfall Quarterly (ata roximate. Gasma isotopic (b); also see
- Duxbury Bay 3-unnth intervals note (f).*
m .o ,g pg, -- . --- . .-.-- ..__.. -. . _ - . . . . - .
Plyneuth or Kingston Harbor ,
- ! Harshfield(d)
- Note (f) and beach surveys art supplemental provision.
IABLE 41 8,l_ -
(Cont'd) . .
l.ocations .
Sampilng and Type and Fregsency Esposure Pathway (Direction-Distance) of Analysis or Sample Type _ _ from Reactor _
Collection Frequency ,
Discharge outfall Semi-annua 11y Gasma isotopic (b)
Irish Moss Manomet Pt.
- E111sville(d)
Vicinity of discharge Four times per season
~
Gasuna isotopic (b)on Lobster -
edible portions.
int
- pffshoregay Once per season Vicinity of discharge quarterly, Groups I and II (e? Games isotopic (b) on l Fish int Inseason,GroupsIIIandIVLe) edibleportions(e) i pfishora,II Annually, each group ; _ . .
k Rocky Point Semi-annually Gammaisotopic(b)(c).
Sediments
- P1yseuth Harbor see also note (g) *
,1 Duxbury Bay -
P1yseuth Beach yy Manomet Pt.
Marshfield (d)
INGESTION (Terrestrial)
Milk Plymouth County Fa m Sant-senthly during periods when Gasen isotopic (b) Sr-89 (W-3.5 mi.)(h); Whitman animals'are on pasture, other- 90 ponthly; radiolodine Farm (lef-21 mi.) (d) Wise senthly analysis all samples.
Cranberries Manomet Pt. Dog At time of harvest - Gammaisotopic(6)on (SE-2.6mi. edible portions.
Bartlett Rd). Soli '
hSSE/5-48mi)W-17al.)(d) inest.nosluu
- Note (g) is supplemental prowlslon g
( ,,
t .
{ ..a .
iABLI4.,5.1 -
i - '
i
[ Cont'd) locations type and Frequency tapesare Pathway (Ofraction-Distaisce) haspiledanS Cettectlen Freauency of Analysis or_ Sample type _ from Reactor __ .
samns isotopic (b)
Tuberous and Rarbott Fate (5$t-2.0 mi.)(h) At time of harvest -
on edible portions.
green leafy Bridgewater Farm ,
vegetables (W-20mi.) (d) .
Fars Annually saamm isotopic (b)
Seet Ferage l
4
!i -
1i 4
jI . .
l i
c
. . . .a. _ _ _ . . . - _ -. . _ -
,!3 - .
i 2R191 -
(a) II gross beta radioactivity is greater than 10 tians the contral value, i;; 't samma isotopic will be performed on the ammple.
(b) Gasma isotopic anans the identification and gn==e4fication of samme- "
- i esitting radionuclides that any be attributable to the affluents from ll the facility.
- } -(e) If integrated gamma activity (less E-40) is greater than 10 tdass the' control
- j value (less E-40), strontium-90 analysis will be perforand on the sample. .
I (d) Indicates esmerol Laa-ef =. ~
~
(a) Fish analyses vill be perforne'd on a. minimum of 2 sub-samples. ----4-ting of appraw4==e=17 400 grams each from each ef.the Fa1W== gramps:
- 1. Bottom Oriented 11. EsarBottsu 111. Jandrammes 17. Constal
! .. Biaev4h=*4a= Migratory I
, Winter flounder Tautog Alewife s'==f4=h i-Yellowtail flounder Cuaner Iainbow smalt Atlantic beTring !
Atlantic cod Striped base Atlantic manheden Fo11sch Ae1==e4e ancheral '
Enkes -
(f)* .. Mussel samples from four loe= eda == (:tamediate vicinity of discharge --*-11 ;
Manoast Ft.. Flymouth or Eingston Earker, and.assen Jarbor.ia Marshfield) uill be. analysed quartarly as.fellouss - '
One kilogram est weight of assoal bodies, 4-w4= 'f1mid within abells will
. be callected. Bodies will be toduced in volume by .;.4 3 at abent 100*C.
Sample will be campacted and analyzed by G3(I.1) samme spectrometry or altera' ate
- technique, if neessaary, to achieve a sensitivity ** sf 5.pC1/kg for Co-134 i Co-137. C4 Zn-65 and Zr-95.and.25 pC1/kg forJa-244.
The unseel shall ammple from ses. location (the h-=*4a= semrest tho' d'acharam
}'
canal ==1*== otherwise ap<ecified 1nsraumat to licensee's agreement with Mass, Wildlife yederation will be analyzed mesh quarter. Akna additional aussel shell sampla (from )the Green Earbor asention .anless otherwise specifie le pursumat to licensee's agreement with Mass u<1A14f. 7.d. ,=e4=n) uill.be analysed osmMy. 11aserubbed shells to be analyzed e111 he dried, processed.-and analyzed =4=d1=ely so.ths - 2 bodies.
Because of-the smalliolamme reduction :ta pre-processing of: shells, sensitivi-ties seemin=d will be less than that for assaal bodies. 1he equipment and counting times to be employed for analyses of =halla mill be the asme or 4
. comparable to that employed for massel bodies ao. that the reduction la
- sensitivities (relative to these for aussel bodies) uill be strictly. limited to the effects of poorer geometry r=1=ead to louer samplewlume reduction.
- Shell samples.aot scheduled for analysis vill be Teserved (unscrubbed) for
! possible later analysis, depending upon recommendations of the review enemittee. .
i e
,i
- Supplemental provision.
l **All sensitivity values to be determined la accordance with -footnote (a) to Table 4.8.4., viz.,11D at 952 confidence level-on 3 ; 30% confidence 3evel em $s (See EASL-300 for d=f4n4e4=ns).
k
^ -
..,-.L
~ . - - . - - - . ...
9
- t -
4 . .
9,. - -
a -
4 Notes (Cont'd) x --
o ._
If radiocesium (Cs-134 and Cs-137) activity exceeds 200 pCi/kg (wet)
] in mussel bodies, these samples win be analyzed by radiochemical spearstion, electrodeposition, and alpha spectrometry for radioisotopes
] of plutonium, with a sensitivity of 0.4 pC1/kg. .
(g)* Sediment samples from four locations Ofanomet Pt. Rocky Pt. , Plymouth -
~
Harbor, and head of Duxbury Bay) win be analysed once per year
.l (preferably early summer) as fonous:
b Cores will be taken to depths of .30-cm, =4n4== depth wherever sediment conditions permit by a hand-coring sampling device. If sediment conditions do not permit 30-cm deep cores, the deepest cores achievable with a hand-coring device wi n be takan. In any case, core depths viu not be less than.14-ca. Core samples will be sectioned into 2-cm increments, l and surface and alternate increments analyzed, others reserved. Sediment
- ' sample volumes (determined by core diameter and/or number of individual ll cores taken from any single loestion) and counting technique win be i,
sufficient to achieve sensitivities of 50 pC1/kg dry sediment.for ca-134, Cs-137, Co-60, 2n-65, and Ir-95 and 150 pCi/kg for Ce-144. In any case j, ,
individual core diameters will not be lass than 2 inches.
- D e top 2-cm section from each core will be analyzed for Pu isotopes -
~
'(Pu-238, Pu-239, 240) using radiochemical separations, e3actrodeposition, t
and alpha spectrometry with target sensitivity of 25 pC1/kg dry ==nf4==nt.
t
'Dae additional core slices per year (mid-depth slice from sore samplas 1 taken at Eseky Point and Plymouth Earbor, unless otherwise s;-- m =d i
pursuant to licensee's agreement with Mass laildlifa yederation) will be
- (jsisilarlysmalysed.
- (h) D ese iocations any be alterad in accordanes with resnits of surveys
! discussed in paragraphs 4.8.D-3 and 4.5.D-4.
i t
I -
8 l
't -
- &applemental previsiae D-10 s
- q. - . . . _ , - - - - - . - -
t TABLE 4.8.2 AIRPARTTCULATES. CASE 005RADTOTODTNEANDS'1TLsur.vr.ubOICTKTATI Samplina Location Distance and (Sample Desianation) Direction from Reactor j
t -
Offsite Jr=H -= .
I 2ast IIeymouth (EF) * .23.a12as WW 4.5 miles U-agni -
F2ymouth. er (PQ ..
aiemmest substatism (ME) .2.5.m12as SE Caft'asskJras (G)
.s.9 miles S m n ,- w - - .
Essky.3121.Esad (IR) 'S.Sh SE
.Eseky 3112.asad (IIR) . .S.3 miles 1MMr ausz2sek Asse (aa) .s.a3.mises v
. 7:sperry.ums (st) .s.36.a12ms ser
.I -
s . -
W =13 ridge (FE) 8.34.aises N
'. :S.S.mises III East 3ssakuutar (IB)
- (us) . :n.c3.a12as ssE f
i .
I J
e i
9 ge e c . i s stia. *
)
g e
l
? . wu -
e
n...____.-..,_... .
- - - - - ~. l. 7 - - - . _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ - _
i 8,
t T'ABLE 4.8.3 1
EXTERNAL GA MA EXPOSURE SURVEILLAN G STATIONS (TLD)
)
l . Distance and .
- l. Dosimeter Location (Desianatisal Direction from Station 6
i Offsite Stations East Weymouth (EW)* 23 miles Inf
- Eingstos (ES) . 10 miles IINU -
Sagamora (G) . . 20 miles 35E-S Flyacuch irport (SA) .. 3 a13es Wu North Flymouth. (NF) 3.5 miles suu Plymouth Centar (PQ 4.5 atada s.uus South Plymouth (SP) .3 .a 13:as EBU Menomet (W) :2.3 miles SIE
- Massent 05)
- .2.5 mLles SE Manonet (1f) 2.23.uiles 255-8 I _ Clef L RJek Area (CR) 9.9 miles 3 Seguish Neck (EN) "
~-
4.6 si1 [ EN 7W ***
I G ita s'tatsses' Rocky Elli Essd (IR) ;S.S miles SE Itisrevase Tamer (str) .S.M . miles 3 Socky Bill Band (UR) -
A3 miles 4NRW l
Rocky Mill Essd (3) S.3 miles:SSE Property Line (N) . 'D.21.ailes SSU Preparty Line (I) 3.14 miles a v i '
1 Public Parking Area (PA) O.07 miles IMME 1 .
jl
- Overlook Area (04 S.03 miles 5 '
i! .
!:
- Contro,1,S.tas,1am
,, C Data free this surveillance station ta subject to detector ==4=*= names and
'l retrieval '9 a private party set subject to control by the licensee. Therefore, i' the requirnoemt to entstata this station is amatingsms as seat 4== ~
_ "=h414ty ll and maintenasse by the ausside party. * ' ~ ~ ' * *
- Supplemesttal proviaism j
,. ~-'...T'... , . ._. . . --- - - ' - ' - ~
^
- .. .--~~,- ,
. s. . . . . _e.
, s
_ TABLE 4.8.6 ;
. i (d)
. . gtTtcTICII CApA8tLttiES pOR EHvitoISItalfAL SaleLE AIIALYSIS ',
ImmairLanteofDetection(a) ,, ,
l Ueter Airborne partientate Wet setido Dry seitds Matk'
) - Amstyste pct /1 er see - pct /n3 pct /us pct /us pct /1 Stese beta 2 1 m le-I _
N-3 350 .
b-34 15 130 60
! pe-59 30 260 120 -
Y -
U co-58,60 $5 2 m 10,2 130 60 -
In-65 30 160 120 3r-89 10 .
- 60 le i
i se-90 2 e 150 2 1 i
! te s t$ 10.
1 l
t-131 ia80-0 90(h) 3 (e) -
! Co-134;13) l$ 1 a 10-I 96 hSO 15 I te/t.a-14e il -
15 l
{ __
I*I the mont'nal iewer limite of detection ek the 951 confidence level (defined in the taOA Nestth and safety 1.abetetery precedures manuel, llA5L-300). (d) thletdieapplinetoattsmalysesother them these for which bisher eenettivities appt
- Ik1 Applies only to analyste et green leafy. vegetables.
)
(c) Senettivity with 233 etter at the 952 confidence lewl.
la accordance with slotes (f) and (s) to Table g
4_,3,t, , _ _,,,,_ _
t E _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
arsen Hereer A .
oe Cepe ' Cod t
Dunbury l
. SeY l
- e i : 4 e ,
Kingsten N scALs as ass &as Mymouth Norber Recty hint terren -
O Cove .
e4
- m eur.smee Om
. t l ,
, LEGEND D 1RISH MOSS gygg ,
i '
O SOFT 5 HELL CLAMS Marbar
- l ,
e MUSSELS A SEDIMENT -
~
!; 5 QUAHOG 5 .
- e i1! .
i l
,no . - - - -. ; - -
,, n .~ ,,s l
g .
- D-14
1,-
i 6.9.C Unieue Reportina Reevirements ,
'l .
- a -
- 2. Environmental protras Data f
E. Annual Report. A report as the radiological envirsamental surveillance program for the previous 12 months of operation .
3 shall be submitted to the Director of the NRC Regional Office (with a copy to the Director, Office of Nuclear Enactor Regulation) as a separate doceent within 90 days after January 1 of each year. The reports shall include summarias, interpret-l atisma, and statistisal evaluation of the results of the radio-logical envizzamental surveillance activities for the report pertad.. including a.samparison with preoperational studies.
. operational cuatrols (as .,r. r.iate), and previous envirotusental
- surveillance reports, and sa ==--t of .the observed impacts of the plant sparation on the enviroussent. The reporta shall i'
also 4=e1=da the resalta of any land use surveys which affect the:ahoice of.ameple Zacattoms. 'If harmful effects or evidence l
i of irreversible damage are detected by the monitoring .the
'licasses shall provide an analysis of the proklam.and a proposed ;
soumms af astian to allssista the ymmblem.
i Essalta sf.411 sad 4=1=g4e=1 meir=-==e=1 aumples ahall be
~ ,
h-I and tabu 3ated on an. annual haats. In the event that j-
- some Teemits ama mot available within the 90-day period, the 1
- Tepert shall he submitted, astdag and explaistag :the reasons l I .for the sissing Tasmita. The =4==43g data shall.he ankaitted b
..as ammaas possible Ja a supp1smessary report.
.b. Anamalaus mensw 1rupert. :Tf sedinactivity is an indicator t
i' -
~,
medium from as aff-site Zacation is Somed and confirmed at a level exceeding tan times the esstrel statisa value, a writtan
>. Tapart shall he auh=4++=d to the.:Disector af .the IWC ansional
! Offfan (with a espy to the. Director Office of Nuclasr Beacter
- Eagh=) =f*Me 3D days after e==*4*matism.** This report shall include an ev=1==+4- of any us3mese e==d4+4===, emetrommental
. facasus .or scher aspects m. as ==m= ths.aammaisus result.
l .
\t -
i!;e .
4
- A seafirmatory reenslysis af the er4=*W a dupliante, se a sse
!g ammpla may be desirstle, as appropriata. The Tasmits of .the men-firmatory smalysis shall he sempleted at:the earliest time consistost ll I with the analysis. .hmt Jm:amy case withim.30 days af receipt af .the 1 - i - m -
- 13. -
l .
!l 9
- ( .
1
' 3-13 i
--- -----.---n,n_ . ._, __ _,
l .
I I
( -
} -
g -
L .
. .'. p <A. '
\
.c
. .- ,e L.* =
. .e4
- 3. aAu - ,=.==T
=.
..f .go 4 at,4j ,. , '
.. Q L ( * &9 --p#.%, ,
w, ,
\:-g g-U'
\.y
.s ,,
~
to
./ -
.": 9 f"L M T .
. N';
ik .
.- . o w
..A e, r 4_:
unas
- i Paoessery La s me *- sa nocaveau.nono es
- PeopenTv uma ses
- w esecmomava tenen om .
3 Pelopg N T Y u ma fee is tesem004 ROac esas
- to Weef73 eemst spac gewP
-. 4PagpgerTV uss Se*
g mOcKveetLL A SAS 4A1 8 17 F8tOPENTv uset see . .
4 Meert1 TTY unst esel 18 810CKY
- sell locas feest4 19 9eiertRTY usee 1 Age 7 PUSUC9aftetteeS 4818A 8the
- 4 Platstellass esteOGE 8898 3 PetOPWWITY Lleet ut9 .
9 Ov8ALDOst astSA 1944 21 #ccutv teeLL mens ssutt
! M *EtOPWITv uset ILP
- 10 BAST SetEAstewaTSR ESI .
ti poopenTV uma scos a maaeosouse seen 12 PetoptWTv unsE meste 3e penopgglTV Lise pL3 I
o oneenseTenmee A am eanticukATas asso casasernes ITLos f
%dditismal station met seguired by Specification 4.8.3.1 I
i
- Figure 4.3.2 Imention of Onsite Monitarisig Stations D -16
Ais .
se
/
)
i
.,' . ', * *Las
~.
- Canecar aor
- . ,. , s.,,
- ., # 6
. nov -
so
. 4 e
- s. 9 eo 4
4
- em m o
. en
, l e -
. m ouservaTTLas. , _,. _ o ,
aosmersne mm uo s
. s
.hEER!9 i museum ,em
- e enamomeT ase 2 asedsTOne taal te m aaso u tT mest J *softwe 49esouTwesp1 11 esasso u f7 aset*
4 vicieeutw cswena ocs 12 cousas posso em*
s souwe asumourm sp u saammens usi 4 Sa v esc at estfvt S of* 14 MTascufwase90pt sat 7 stserpoemaasasai issas wevieuta een 1
s met ase: 16. Saquish lleck (SN) i
- additismal stations not required by Speciftsstics 4...
3 31 n
- ...n.c.uonorerzus.u.a mt.,s uom i b17
C m
S E
-e 3e2 = =
2=
$$ - - ~
g w
l C .
O %
~
(( "
SR W m lg '*
3I "
Ej ~2 5 3 =S== E R E
.s = =
sq
- - . . - ~ - ~
E M
a t =l 3 y
- ~
.tt C ..
Y G 2~ *
-C3 En 2 2 ja E 2 a
,e E '
g-
- }"*2 3= "2.% -- 1* "9 I
R S
A1
- =
= - ,
.
., n = ,= = , ,
- . . x=. T i
E d ,h j .h. jk2!2 7,
~7 aa I y henchent No. 57 D-18
APPENDIX E - 1983 Garden & Milk-Producing Anirnal Survey E-1
' f ' ,- " m 9 o e co - CFFICE MEMERANDUM ff - - ~
&- p.g. 3 ev' - 2'
. ,,,,,,, ds RMG Control No.
b.
C. E. Bowman h -
M90hm T. L. Sowdon prepare by Dept. Doc. No.
V h' To - 10/27/83 RehW by _
ERHS#83-168 Date Record Type Actor @esponse Reg red Yes O No C
Subject:
1983 GARDEN & MILK PRODUCING ANIMAL CENSUS As required by PNPS Environmental Technical Specifications, the 1983 Garden & Milk-Producing Animal Census was conducted on 9/16/83 in a street by street search of the area within 1 mile of PNPS.
The existence of gardens near the site boundaries of 0.7 miles West and 0.6 miles ESE was confirmed. These gardens are the closest and largest in the near vicinity (1 mile) of PNPS, and are less than 500 sq. ft. They do represent conservative garden locations for sampling analysis and dose calculation. With the assistance of Mr. Robert Tis, vegetation samples were collected from three locations on 9/27/83. Only two of these locations are within one mile of PNPS. A sample of squash leaves and chinese cabbage was collected from the J. Work Residence (0.6 miles ESE) of John Alden Road; thubbarb was obtained from the Lyoyd-Evans residence (0.7 miles West) on Gate Road; and, lettuce was collected from the Whipple Farm (1.5 miles SSW) off Daten Road.
In addition, no cows or goats or structures which would indicate the C., presence of such animals within 1 inile of PNPS were found. The Plymouth Animal Inspector forwarded a listing of the 1983 Census as well as a listing of the 1983 Barn Check. The location of cows and goats in the area are as follows:
Animals location Status Owner 4 Black Angus Lavery Lane Agreed to supply a Bettencourt hay sample next year.
1 Heifer
- Seaver Das Road See Charlie Mann
.lohn Davis 1 Cow
.. -- e ,-.-n l
t I
Kep u.r Diatttbution.
f i
vacuutur (gg
[
i C Selety Related a mn see.irusi.d wa No NOV 04 EB3 i
@M O Ust No FAoiSTAt O" Systern No
F eenn asue Page of l asse.pennmeest Dept. oCC. No :
.! Date-To-aW Nancy Lloyd 5 Goats Long Pond Road Goats are miniature in size and don't provide a large enough sample 1 Heifer State Road Has participated charlie'flann ' in Environmental Program since 1982 Plymouth .2 Cows Warren Avenue Declined to Plantation participate.
Warren Raymond :2 Ecats Off White Horse Rd. Goats are sporatic at this location u Black Angus - Hedge Pond fRoad Agreed to supply a .
serald Sheehan
(- hay sagle next year.
1 Cow Federal Furnace Location is Fred Wood greater than 5 Road miles from PNPS.
- 9tr. flann's heifer is located on *. Davis' property.
In addition to the above, the Plymouth County Farm continues to
. participate in the Environmental stonitoring Program.
In conclusion, the 1983 Census indicates that there are no additional indicator stations available for milk sampling.
0 .
S
Census,1983 C
George Almeida 5 Pigs 221 South Pond Road Kenny Craig 1 Sow 113 Beach St.
1 Heifer, I Horse
2 Sows, 1 Cow Beaver Dam Rd.
Nancy Lloyd 5 Goats Long Pond Rd.
Charlie Mann 1 Heifer State Road i Warren Raymond 2 Sosts Dff Wnite Horse Road
- Plynouth~ Plantation .2 Cows Sandra Sharp 2 Ponies 8 3 Pigs Carver Road
(- Gerald Sheehan 16 Black Angus Hedge Pond Rd.
Frank Shaw 3 Ponies 3 Sous Old Sandwich Rd.
. Paul Whipple 17 Beefalo Daten Rd.
1 Cow Fred Wood Federal Furnace Rd.
.2 Sows, & 2 Steers Milton Wood Braley Lane 4 Black Angus Bettencourt
.Lavery Lane O
l
. l O
1987 BARN CHECKS Dennis & Priscilla Pinto 1 Horse Woodpine Drive William E. Staples 1 Pony James Circle Charly Ann Tupper 1 Horse Federal Furnace Road John Campbell 4 Horses WPLM Frank Dunlap 2 Horses 305 Sandwich St.
Marjorie Connolly 1 Norse Tower Road 1 Horse & 1 Pony
(,* Laura Lartz Cushing Drive Allen D. Capella 1 Horse Opery Street 1 Pony .
Robin Remick State Rd., Little Peoples Place 1 Norse Herbert Danielson Old Sandwich Road 2 Horses Bernadette Dezendes College Pond Rd.
2 Horses & 1 Pony John Andosta Daten Road 4 Horses Spencer Brewster Sandwich Road 1 Horse Edward & Roberta Grines Independence & Mast Road 1 Horse ,
Gilbert Silva Carver Road
({} 1 Horse Linda Wanners South Meadow Road
. . _ __ ..._....__.2. _ _ __
h Eleanor Thamalis West Long Pond Road 2 Horses Milton Wood 2 Ponies Braley Lane Farl Studley 1 Pony White Horse s Lucille Brewster
- 1 Horse Wellsbrook Mrs. Paul 7 Horses Long Pond Road 1 Pony Albert Saunders Pinewood Road
(
0
I ,
O. ..
O h ,
NUC4-F9 .
GARDEN CENSUS F0896 j'
l No. Streets surveyed 30 Date 9/16/83 House Carden Leary Distance and 2 Vegetables and Azimuth Iaitfals Street Name haber $O0 it N/A 4500 ft 2 Rhubbard 0.7 miles W fGATEROAD (Lloyd-EvansResidence) 393 <500 ft Squash Leaves 0.6 miles ESE J0WI ALDEN ROAD and i (J.WorkResidence) Chinese Cabbage l -
2 N/A > 500 f t Cabbage 1.5 miles SSW INTERSEtt!ON OF CLIFFORD ROAD APO DOTEN ROAD (Whipple Fars) 1 l
Rev. O 1.1.2A-1
I l O .
n n... .
UtlC46-F11 . ,
r
~
Nil.K AllIMAL CENSt5 ftNIN ,-
No. Streets serveyed 30 Bete 9/16/83 !
Reese No. of Type of Distance and l
lhamber Amisals Animals Owner Azimuth Initials l Street Weee 1
None of the streets surveyed had cows or goats or structures which would (MU Indicate the presence of such animals.
i t
l i 1
l 1
1 I
i e
h 1
l l.l.3A-f Rev. O
SOSTON EDISON COMPANY 500 BOYLSTON ETREET 5057DN. M AssACHUSETTs 02199 W8LLI AM D. HARMIN1rf D N genten wees acessemert e
April 5, 1984 BEco 84-051 Nr. Thomas E. Murley Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 License No. OPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Report No.16 January 1 - December 31, 1983
Dear Sir:
In accordance with the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Technical Specification 6.9.C.2, Boston Edison Company hereby submits Environmental Radiological Monitoring Report No.16. This report applies to the period from January 1, 1983 through Decenber 31, 1983.
Very truly yours, Attactements: (2 copies) cc: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 (18 copies) ll