05000528/FIN-2012005-04
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Inadequate Tracking of Functional Assessment for Spent Fuel Pool Heat Load |
Description | The inspectors identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, for the failure of operations and engineering personnel to follow station procedures to perform operability determinations and functional assessments. Specifically, plant personnel did not maintain appropriate controls to ensure that the heat load and temperature limits established in the functional assessment for the spent fuel pools were monitored. This issue is captured in Palo Verde Action Request 4251108. To restore compliance, the licensee issued a technical specification component condition record to prohibit entry into Mode 4 following a refueling outage, until decay heat load in the spent fuel pool is verified to be less than the more restrictive limit established in the functional assessment. The failure to follow Procedure 40DP-9OP26 for performing functional assessments is a performance deficiency. This performance deficiency was more than minor because it is associated with the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone attribute of design control and it adversely affected the cornerstone objective to provide reasonable assurance that physical design barriers protect the public from radionuclide releases caused by accident or events. Using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609.04, Initial Characterization of Findings, and Manual Chapter 0609 Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power, the inspectors determined that the finding had very low safety significance (Green) because the finding was confirmed not to adversely affect decay heat removal capabilities from the spent fuel pool causing the pool temperature to exceed the maximum analyzed temperature limit specified in the site-specific licensing basis. The inspectors determined that the finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance associated with decision making. Specifically, Palo Verde did not communicate the procedural limits established in the spent fuel pool functional assessment to appropriate operations personnel. |
Site: | Palo Verde |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000528/2012005 Section 1R15 |
Date counted | Dec 31, 2012 (2012Q4) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Barrier Integrity |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.15 |
Inspectors (proximate) | M Brown L Carson S Garchow D Allen J Reynoso M Young B Larson J Groom I Anchondo N Hernandez D You |
CCA | H.10, Bases for Decisions |
INPO aspect | CO.2 |
' | |
Finding - Palo Verde - IR 05000528/2012005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Palo Verde) @ 2012Q4
Self-Identified List (Palo Verde)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||