text
._
)
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION j
Nebraska Public Power District
" * '"lh"EJa"J'#%""^ST^ ""'
a.
CNSS948060 1
1 February 18, 1994 l
J
]-
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk j
1-Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Sir:
Cooper Nuclear Station Licensee Event Report 94-001, is forwarded as an 3
attachment to this letter.
f Sincerely, huyl peg R. L. Gardner
]
Plant Manager RLG/nc Attachment i
cc:
L. J. Callan G. R. Horn j
J. M. Meacham i
R. E. Wilbur V. L. Wolstenholm D. A. Whitman INPO Records Center i
NRC Resident Inspector l
R. J. Singer CNS Training CNS Quality Assurance CNS Regulatory Compliance Specialist 220127
\\
a 9403020028 940218 PDR ADOCK 05000298 8
PDR
~
, = -.
_..~
~-.
NQC Form 384 U.S. NUCLECM GEOULQTORY COMMIS$10N aPPROVf D OMB NO 3M0 0104 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
EXPIRES 8/3900 FACILITY NAME (11 DOCKET NUMBER (21 FAGE 638 Cooner Nuclear Station 0 l5l0l0l01219 18 1 lOFl 014 UrYe'dhectedOpeningoftheHighPressureCoolant Injection Pump Minimum Flow Valve, an ESF Cnsp on e n t.. Durine Surveillance Test ine Due t o Ac t uat ion of the Pump Discharte Pressure Switch EVENT DATE 161 LER NUMBER 16)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED ISI MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQ AL g is MONTH DAY YEAR P ACILITY N AMES DOCKET NUMBER (S) p 0l5[0[0l0) l l O l1 9l4 0 l0 0 l2 1 lB 9l4 0 l5l0 l0 1 0; [ l 1 9 9
4 0 01 l
THIS REPORT 88 $USMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 9: tchec4 ene or more of rae folio ympf 1111 OPE R ATING MODE (S)
N 20.402(mi
- 20. 0stei 60.72i.H2io i 73.rismi 2
POWE R 20.406(aHiHil 50.3SleH1) 60.73(eH2Hv) 73.71(s) 10 1 l0 l 0 20.Osi.Hiw 60.mi.H2>
60.73i.H2H.at OTHER rspectfy /s Abstract 20 406tsH1Hd4 60.73teH2Hij 60.73(sH2HvisiHA)
J66Al 20.406ieH1Hivl 60.73teH2 Hill 60.73tsH2HvillHB) 20.406(sHt Hvi 60.734aH2Hui) 60.73teH2Hal LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THl3 LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER ARE A CODE Donald L.
Reeves. Jr.
4 p 12 8 l 215 l -13 l 81111 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT F AILURE DESCRiaED IN THis REPORT (13)
O'
"#%f Rf0NPRD s
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT g
O NPR I l i l l I l
i I I l l I I
I I I I l l 1
l l l l 1 i SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
MONTH DAY YEAR SUBMISSION YES (If yes, compoete f *PECTED SUBut$$10N CA Til NO l
l l
ACSTQDCT ILimit to 1400 spaces. I e., soorosomereer rrteen sinaie sonce typewrirsen knes) (161 e
On January 19, 1994, at approximately 2:15 am, with the plant in full power operation, HPCI-MOV-M025, the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) pump minimum flow bypass valve, unexpectedly opened during surveillance testing while the pump discharge valve was being opened. An initial assessment indicated that the cause of the actuation was due to pressure fluctuations caused by the pressure maintenance system. HPCI-MOV-M025 was closed, system parameters were verified to be normal, and the surveillance test was continued without any further problems.
An engineering evaluation concluded that operation of the valve could occur when HPCI-MOV-M020, the pump discharge valve is re-opened.
Discussions with Control Room Operators revealed that occasionally, the valve had automatically opened during past valve operability tests.
Such actuation (s) had not been reported due to lack of understanding of the extent of ESF component level reporting requirements. However, due to increased emphasis on a questioning attitude and attention to detail, this actuation was documented as a discrepancy and subsequently determined to be
(
reportable.
The root cause of the problem is design, since unnecessary actuations of the minimum flow valve should not occur.
A procedure change was made to the HPCI valve operability surveillance test to ensure operator awareness that automatic operation of the minimum flow valve could occur when HPCI-MOV-M020 is re-opened. A similar change has been made to the RCIC surveillance test.
An evaluation of the HPCI and RCIC Pump Discharge Pressure switch configurations and setpoints will be made and changes implemented, if practical, to eliminate the unnecessary cycling of the minimum flow valves. To ensure operator awareness of reporting requirements, licensed Operators will be apprised of ESF component level reporting requirements.
"s"e*3I"" "*
l
.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CODMISSION APPROVED BY OMB No. 3150-0104 (5 92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESilMATE TO LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH TEXT CONTINUATION (MNsB m 4), u.s. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555 0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ~ PROJECT (3150 0104),
OFFICE OF l
MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET d ASHINGTON. DC 20503.
I FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NtNBER (2)
LFR M IBER (6?
PA& (3)
SEQUENTIAL REVISION YEAR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION 05000298 94 00 2 OF 2 001 --
TEXT fif more space is reavired, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17) l A.
Event Description
On January 19, 1994, at approximately 2:15 am, HPCI-MOV-M025, the High l
Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) pump minimum flow bypass valve, unexpectedly l
opened during surveillance testing when HPCI-MOV-M020, the pump discharge valve, was being opened. HPCI-MOV-M025 automatically opens if HPCI System Flow is <485 gpm and either a HPCI Initiation signal is received or pump discharge pressure is >125 psig. An initial assessment indicated that the most likely cause of the unexpected actuation was due to pressure fluctuations i
caused by the pressure maintenance system. HPCI-MOV-M025 was closed, system parameters were verified to be normal, and the surveillance test was continued without any further problems.
B.
Plant Status The plant was in operation at full power, conducting monthly surveillance testing of the HPCI System Motor Operated Valves (MOVs).
C.
Dasis for Report The unexpected, autorcatic actuation of HPCI-MOV-M025, an ESF component, during surveillance testing on January 19, is reportable in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).
Thfs condition was determined to be reportable at approximately 1:15 pm on January 20, the day af ter test performance, following a review of the surveillance test.
D.
Cause
An engineering evaluation concluded that operation of the minimum flow valve could occur when HPCI-MOV-M020, the normally open pump discharge valve, is re-opened after being closed during the valve operability surveillance test.
In order to cycle the HPCI Injection valve, HPCI-MOV M019, HPCI MOV-M020 is closed first, then HPCI-MOV-M019 is cycled open and closed.
Pressure measurements taken on January 21 revealed that upon closure of the pump discharge valve, pressure between it and the injection valve increased from 70 psig to 100 psig as the valve was driven into its seat.
Cycling the injection valve resulted in increasing the pressure between the valves to 150 psig; an immediate increase from 100 to 140 psig upon valve operation in the open direction and an increase of 10 more psig as the valve was driven into its seat.
Due to the fact that there was no gradual upward trend in pressure when the injection valve was open, engineering concluded that the injection check valve, HPCI-CV-29CV, was essentially leak tight. Upon actuation of HPCI-MOV-M020 to the open position, a pressure wave was created which was of sufficient magnitude to cause the HPCI Pump High Pressure Discharge switch, HPCI-PS-85, to actuate at 125 psig. Actuation of this switch caused HPCI-MOV-M025 to automatically open.
MC FORM 366A (5 92)
- ~ - - -
WC FORM
- 3664 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CGO4ISS10N APPROVED BY G W No. 3150-0104 (5 C2)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 l
ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH j
THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
j FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH TEXT CONTINUATION (MNBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555 0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150 0104),
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
FACILITY NAM (1)
DOCKET M BER p)
HR M k (6?
NW SEQUENTIAL REVISION YEAR NUMBER NUMBER COOPER NUCLEAR STATION 05000298 94 00 3 OF 3
-- 0 01 --
TEXT (If more space is reautred. use additional cooles of NRC Form 366A) (IT)i Discussions with Control Roem Operators revealed that the minimum flow valve had occasionally opened aut.omatically during past MOV operability tests.
Such actuation (s) had not been reported due to lack of understanding of the essential ESF component level reporting requirements. However, due to increased emphasis on a questioning attitude and attention to detail, this actuation was documented as a discrepancy and subsequently determined to be reportable. The root cause of the problem is design, since unnecessary actuations of the minimum flow valve should not occur.
E.
Safety Sinnificance HPCI-MOV-M025 is provided for pump protection. Upon system initiation, the valve opens and remains open until system flow reaches 800 gpm, at which point the valve automatically closes.
The valve will reopen at 485 gpm on decreasing flow.
Flow through the minimum flow line is returned to the Suppression Pool.
Following the unexpected actuation of the valve to the open position, the licensed Control Room Operator reclosed the valve. The valve operated properly and remained closed. The surveillance test was resumed and operation of the minimum flow valve was checked in later steps of the test procedure.
Its operation was determined to be satisfactory.
Consequently, the unexpected actuation of the valve would not have affected system operability.
F.
Safety Implications l
Due to the fact that valve operability was determined to be satisfactory, this event was of little safety consequence. Had valve operability been affected, the most significant initial plant condition would have been full power operation, i
G.
Corrective Action
As discussed in Section D, Cause, an engineering evaluation of the event revealed that while actuation of the minimum flow valve may not occur every time HPCI-MOV-M020 is reopened during the surveillance test, data taken during the investigation indicates that it should not be unexpected because a pressure increase may be created that is approximately the setpoint of the pressure switch.
Engineering also advised that due to the similarity of the l
logic circuitry for the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) minimum flow l
N3C FORM 366A (5-92) r l
I
~,.,
4 MltC FC2M 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGJLATORY COBOIISSIC APPRoWED BY 01W No. 3150-0104 (5 g2)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THl3 INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
+
FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
THE INFoRMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH TEXT CONTINUATION (MN88 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGUtATORY COMMIS$10N, 4
WASHINGTON, DC 20555 0001 AND To THE PAFERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31EO0104),
OFFICE OF l
i MANAGEMENT AND BU0CET. WASHINGTON. DC 20503.
FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET MIAIBER (2)
LER NLOWER (6l' PAGE (4)
SEQUENTIAL REVISION YEAR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION 05000298 94 00 4 OF 4
-- 0 01 --
i l
TEXT (if more space is reautred, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)valve, its actuation during valve operability surveillance testing also should
~
l not be unexpected. Discussions with Control Room Operators revealed that minimum flow valve actuations had occurred in the past but had not been considered test discrepancies since the basis for their operation was understood.
To ensure operator awareness of the potential actuation, a procedure change was made to the HPCI valve operability surveillance test, indicating that automatic operation of the minimum flow valve could occur when HPCI-MOV M020 was re-opened. A similar change has been made to the RCIC valve operability surveillance test. An evaluation of the HPCI and RCIC Pump Discharge Pressure switch configurations and setpoints will be performed.
If practical, charges will be implemented to eliminate the occasional unnecessary cycling of tha minimum flow valves.
Additionally, to ensure operator awareness of reporting requirements, licensed Operators will be apprised of ESF component level reporting requirements and i
that unplanned ESF component actuations are subject to the notification and reporting requirements prescribed in 10CFR50.72 and 10CFR50.73.
H.
Similar Events
None N3C FORM 366A (5 92)
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000298/LER-1994-001, :on 940119,HPCI Pump Min Flow Bypass Valve Unexpectedly Opened During Surviellance Testing While Pump Discharge Valve Being Opened Due to Actuation of Pump Discharge Pressure Switch.Valve Closed |
- on 940119,HPCI Pump Min Flow Bypass Valve Unexpectedly Opened During Surviellance Testing While Pump Discharge Valve Being Opened Due to Actuation of Pump Discharge Pressure Switch.Valve Closed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000298/LER-1994-003-01, :on 940215,radwaste Bldg High Range Gaseous Effluent Radiation Monitor Declared Inoperable Due to Missing O-ring in Lower Portion of Sample Assembly.Missing O-ring Replaced & Leak Test Conducted |
- on 940215,radwaste Bldg High Range Gaseous Effluent Radiation Monitor Declared Inoperable Due to Missing O-ring in Lower Portion of Sample Assembly.Missing O-ring Replaced & Leak Test Conducted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-003, :on 940215,TS Violations Occurred Due to Inoperable Radiation Monitors.Caused by Improperly Assembled Particulate/Iodine Filter Assemblies.Missing O-rings Replaced & Leak Test Conducted |
- on 940215,TS Violations Occurred Due to Inoperable Radiation Monitors.Caused by Improperly Assembled Particulate/Iodine Filter Assemblies.Missing O-rings Replaced & Leak Test Conducted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-004, :on 940302,reactor Scram Occurred as Result of APRM High Neutron Flux Trip.Caused by Turbine Electro Hydraulic DEH Control Sys Malfunction.Valve Transfer Control Card Replaced |
- on 940302,reactor Scram Occurred as Result of APRM High Neutron Flux Trip.Caused by Turbine Electro Hydraulic DEH Control Sys Malfunction.Valve Transfer Control Card Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(viii) | | 05000298/LER-1994-005, :on 940317,shutdown Cooling Supply Isolation Valves Automically Closed.Cause Was Steam Void Formation & Collapse in RHR System Piping.Corrective Action:Shutdown Cooling Was Restored |
- on 940317,shutdown Cooling Supply Isolation Valves Automically Closed.Cause Was Steam Void Formation & Collapse in RHR System Piping.Corrective Action:Shutdown Cooling Was Restored
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-007, :on 940413,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Lack of Sufficient Restraint on Tubing.Corrective Action: Tubing Placed Back on Fitting & Clamp Was Retensioned.W/ |
- on 940413,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Lack of Sufficient Restraint on Tubing.Corrective Action: Tubing Placed Back on Fitting & Clamp Was Retensioned.W/
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-010, :on 940526,closure of Shutdown Cooling Suction Isolation Valves Occurred.Cause Under Investigation.Suppl Will Specify Corrective Actions to Be Taken to Preclude Recurrence |
- on 940526,closure of Shutdown Cooling Suction Isolation Valves Occurred.Cause Under Investigation.Suppl Will Specify Corrective Actions to Be Taken to Preclude Recurrence
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000298/LER-1994-010-01, :on 940526,closure of Shutdown Cooling Suction Isolation Valves While Warming RHR Sys Due to Leakage Through Minimum Flow Valve.Sr MOV Will Be Checked for torque-in Current During MOV Surveillance |
- on 940526,closure of Shutdown Cooling Suction Isolation Valves While Warming RHR Sys Due to Leakage Through Minimum Flow Valve.Sr MOV Will Be Checked for torque-in Current During MOV Surveillance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-012, :on 940708,TS Noncompliance for HPCI Sys Noted Re Setpoint Discrepancy Associated W/Low Steam Line Isolation Pressure Switches.Requested TS Change to NRC Establishing Operability Limit for HPCI |
- on 940708,TS Noncompliance for HPCI Sys Noted Re Setpoint Discrepancy Associated W/Low Steam Line Isolation Pressure Switches.Requested TS Change to NRC Establishing Operability Limit for HPCI
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000298/LER-1994-013, :on 940712,reactor Scram & Group Isolations Occurred Due to Spurious Trip of Reactor Vessel Level Instruments.Caused by Leaking Solenoid Valve in Ref Leg Injection Sys.Valve Replaced |
- on 940712,reactor Scram & Group Isolations Occurred Due to Spurious Trip of Reactor Vessel Level Instruments.Caused by Leaking Solenoid Valve in Ref Leg Injection Sys.Valve Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000298/LER-1994-014, :on 940723,CR Emergency Filter Sys Failed to Meet Acceptance Criteria Specified in Sp 6.3.17.18 Due to Imbalance in Sys Created by Movement of Damper HV-AD-AD1021C.Damper Modified |
- on 940723,CR Emergency Filter Sys Failed to Meet Acceptance Criteria Specified in Sp 6.3.17.18 Due to Imbalance in Sys Created by Movement of Damper HV-AD-AD1021C.Damper Modified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-015, :on 940910,during RPV Stratification Events Heatup/Cooldown Was Exceeded.Caused by TS LCO 3.6.A.1 Requirement Applied to Average Coolant Temp.Submitted Proposed TS Change That Clarified LCO 3.6.A.1 |
- on 940910,during RPV Stratification Events Heatup/Cooldown Was Exceeded.Caused by TS LCO 3.6.A.1 Requirement Applied to Average Coolant Temp.Submitted Proposed TS Change That Clarified LCO 3.6.A.1
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-016, :on 940804,determined That DG 2 Not in Compliance W/Alternate Shutdown Requirements.Caused by Narrow Interpretation of Isolation Requirements for Dg. Design Change Implemented |
- on 940804,determined That DG 2 Not in Compliance W/Alternate Shutdown Requirements.Caused by Narrow Interpretation of Isolation Requirements for Dg. Design Change Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-017, :on 940809,engineering Evaluation May Not Have Been Responsive to Intent or Potential Ramifications of Condition Addressed by In.Caused by Failure of REC Ci Valve.Evaluation of re-assessment Is ongoing.W/940908 |
- on 940809,engineering Evaluation May Not Have Been Responsive to Intent or Potential Ramifications of Condition Addressed by In.Caused by Failure of REC Ci Valve.Evaluation of re-assessment Is ongoing.W/940908
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000298/LER-1994-019, :on 940411,determined That Feedwater Flow Transmitters Had Been Improperly Calibrated Since Installation in 1980.Caused by Personnel Error.Power Reduced by 20 MW (Th) & Recalibrated |
- on 940411,determined That Feedwater Flow Transmitters Had Been Improperly Calibrated Since Installation in 1980.Caused by Personnel Error.Power Reduced by 20 MW (Th) & Recalibrated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-020, :on 940901,discovered That Elapsed Time Meters Installed in Essential CR HVAC & SGTS Due to Defective Procedures at Time of Installation.Crefs & SGTS Declared Inoperable |
- on 940901,discovered That Elapsed Time Meters Installed in Essential CR HVAC & SGTS Due to Defective Procedures at Time of Installation.Crefs & SGTS Declared Inoperable
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-021, :on 941007,design Flaw Discovered That Could Cause DGs Rendered Inoperable During Fire in Turbine Bldg. Caused by Improperly Executed Minor Design Change.Hp Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Sys Input Disabled |
- on 941007,design Flaw Discovered That Could Cause DGs Rendered Inoperable During Fire in Turbine Bldg. Caused by Improperly Executed Minor Design Change.Hp Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Sys Input Disabled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-022, :on 940919,TS Maximum Flow Limitation for LPCI Sys Were Not Proven by Existing Sp 6.3.5.1.Caused by non-compliance W/Ts Surveillance Requirements.Design Change Acceptance Testing Performed |
- on 940919,TS Maximum Flow Limitation for LPCI Sys Were Not Proven by Existing Sp 6.3.5.1.Caused by non-compliance W/Ts Surveillance Requirements.Design Change Acceptance Testing Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-023, :on 941003,TS Violation Identified for Failure to Perform re-demonstration of DG-1 Operability.Caused by Inadequate Training.Training (Tailgate Sessions) W/Licensed Operations Personnel Will Be Performed |
- on 941003,TS Violation Identified for Failure to Perform re-demonstration of DG-1 Operability.Caused by Inadequate Training.Training (Tailgate Sessions) W/Licensed Operations Personnel Will Be Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000298/LER-1994-024, :on 941002,inoperable Condition of Halon Sys in Svc Water Pump Room Identified.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Procedure 0.39, Fire Watch Will Be Revised.W/ |
- on 941002,inoperable Condition of Halon Sys in Svc Water Pump Room Identified.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Procedure 0.39, Fire Watch Will Be Revised.W/
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-025, :on 940930,improper Installation & Calibr of Kaman Normal & High Range Gaseous Activity Detectors Noted. Caused by Personnel Error.Detectors Reinstalled & Recalibrated |
- on 940930,improper Installation & Calibr of Kaman Normal & High Range Gaseous Activity Detectors Noted. Caused by Personnel Error.Detectors Reinstalled & Recalibrated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000298/LER-1994-026, :on 941009,determined That Temp of Solution in Standby Liquid Control Sys Not Being Monitored,Per Ts.Caused by Mgt/Qa Deficiency.Design Change Will Be Implemented to Upgrade SLC Heat to Comply W/Requirements |
- on 941009,determined That Temp of Solution in Standby Liquid Control Sys Not Being Monitored,Per Ts.Caused by Mgt/Qa Deficiency.Design Change Will Be Implemented to Upgrade SLC Heat to Comply W/Requirements
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-027, :on 941116,non-environmentally Qualified Relay, MS-REL-52XCP Discovered.Caused by Inadequate Procedure to Ensure Proper Identification & Classification of Component. Unqualified Relay MS-REL-52XCP Replaced |
- on 941116,non-environmentally Qualified Relay, MS-REL-52XCP Discovered.Caused by Inadequate Procedure to Ensure Proper Identification & Classification of Component. Unqualified Relay MS-REL-52XCP Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-028, :on 941101,design Error That Places Ultimate Heat Sink in Unanalyzed Condition During Design Low River Level Conditions Due to Mod Made at End of Plant Const That Created Intake Structure Weir Wall |
- on 941101,design Error That Places Ultimate Heat Sink in Unanalyzed Condition During Design Low River Level Conditions Due to Mod Made at End of Plant Const That Created Intake Structure Weir Wall
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-029, Informs NRC That Plant Will Not Be Submitting LER 94-029. Number Internally Assigned to Potentially Reportable Condition That Later Determined Not Reportable | Informs NRC That Plant Will Not Be Submitting LER 94-029. Number Internally Assigned to Potentially Reportable Condition That Later Determined Not Reportable | | | 05000298/LER-1994-030, :on 941010,ceiling Plugs in SW Pump Room Reinstalled & Visual Insp Performed by Person Not QC Certified.Caused by Personnel Error.Maintenance Manager Issued Instructions Re QC Certifications |
- on 941010,ceiling Plugs in SW Pump Room Reinstalled & Visual Insp Performed by Person Not QC Certified.Caused by Personnel Error.Maintenance Manager Issued Instructions Re QC Certifications
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000298/LER-1994-031, :on 941115,discovered That Steam Leak Detection Sys Temp Switches Not Being Calibrated within Surveillance Interval Intended by Tss.Caused by Personnel Error. Calibration Schedule of Switches Updated |
- on 941115,discovered That Steam Leak Detection Sys Temp Switches Not Being Calibrated within Surveillance Interval Intended by Tss.Caused by Personnel Error. Calibration Schedule of Switches Updated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-033, :on 941220,eight SRVs Removed & Sent to W Testing Facilities Because Four of SRV Lift Pressures Higher than Required Setpoint Tolerance.Caused by Design & Mfg.Ge Confirmed set-points Pose No Adverse Affects |
- on 941220,eight SRVs Removed & Sent to W Testing Facilities Because Four of SRV Lift Pressures Higher than Required Setpoint Tolerance.Caused by Design & Mfg.Ge Confirmed set-points Pose No Adverse Affects
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-034, :on 941112,investigation of Emergency Lighting Revealed Potential Problems W/Lamps Due to Maint Program Not Addressing Rated Life Time.Caused by Mgt/Qa Deficiency. Replacement of Batteries,Lamps Required |
- on 941112,investigation of Emergency Lighting Revealed Potential Problems W/Lamps Due to Maint Program Not Addressing Rated Life Time.Caused by Mgt/Qa Deficiency. Replacement of Batteries,Lamps Required
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000298/LER-1994-035, :on 941229,determined That SBGTS Operability Could Not Be Assured Due to Potential Backflow of Water from Z Sump Under Design Basis Accident Conditions.Caused by Design Error.Applicable Procedures Reviewed |
- on 941229,determined That SBGTS Operability Could Not Be Assured Due to Potential Backflow of Water from Z Sump Under Design Basis Accident Conditions.Caused by Design Error.Applicable Procedures Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000298/LER-1994-036, :on 941207,an Electrical Transient on 12.5 Kv Sys Resulted in Loss of Power to Plant Primary electric- Driven Fire Pump & Water Jockey Pump.Caused by Electrical Fault.Alternate Power Source Restored Sys |
- on 941207,an Electrical Transient on 12.5 Kv Sys Resulted in Loss of Power to Plant Primary electric- Driven Fire Pump & Water Jockey Pump.Caused by Electrical Fault.Alternate Power Source Restored Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) |
|