ML17205A451

2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Administered SRO Admin JPMs

ML17205A451
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	05/23/2017
From:	Point Beach
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Shared Package
ML16319A341	List: ML17205A440 ML17205A451 ML17205A458 ML17205A464 ML17205A475 ML17205A489
References
Download: ML17205A451 (53)

Text

JPM JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 1 of 14 JPM TITLE: Review a RCS Leak Rate Determination JPM NUMBER: PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO REV. 0 TASK NUMBER(S) / PBN P119.223.SRO / Review completed procedures TASK TITLE(S):

K/A NUMBERS: 2.1.7 K/A VALUE: 4.4 / 4.7 Justification (FOR K/A VALUES <3.0):

TASK APPLICABILITY:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT OTHER:

APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING: Simulate/Walkthrough: Perform:

EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: Other:

Lab:

Time for Completion: 15 Minutes Time Critical: Yes No Alternate Path [NRC]: Yes No Alternate Path [INPO]: Yes No Developed by:

Instructor/Developer Date Reviewed by:

Instructor (Instructional Review) Date Validated by:

SME (Technical Review) Date Approved by:

Training Supervision Date Approved by:

Training Program Owner Date

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 2 of 14 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?

2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?

3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?

4. Do the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?

5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?

6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?

7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?

8. Is the job level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?

9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?

10. Is justification provided for tasks with K/A values less than 3.0?

11. Have the performance steps been identified and classified (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

12. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?

13. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?

14. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

15. Are all critical steps supported by procedural guidance? (e.g., if licensing, EP or other groups were needed to determine correct actions, then the answer should be NO.)

16. If the JPM is to be administered to an LOIT student, has the required knowledge been taught to the individual prior to administering the JPM?

TPE does not have to be completed, but the JPM evaluation may not be valid if they have not been taught the required knowledge.

All questions/statements must be answered YES or N/A or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES or N/A, then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the initial validation shall sign and date the cover sheet.

Protected Content: (CAPRs, corrective actions, licensing commitments, etc. associated with this material)

{C001}

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 3 of 14 UPDATE LOG: Indicate in the following table any minor changes or major revisions (as defined in TR-AA-230-1003) made to the material after initial approval. Or use separate Update Log form TR-AA-230-1003-F16.

PREPARER DATE

1. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE REASON FOR CHANGE AR/TWR#

REVIEWER DATE Rev. 0 Developed for the 2017 NRC ILT Exam.

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 4 of 14 SIMULATOR SET-UP: (Only required for simulator JPMs)

Simulator Setup Instructions:

1.

2.

SIMULATOR MALFUNCTIONS:

SIMULATOR OVERRIDES:

SIMULATOR REMOTE FUNCTIONS:

Required Materials: 1. OI-55, Primary Leak Rate Calculation (Procedure marked up as completed through step 5.5.8 and Attachment A completed through step 5.0)

2. Calculator General

References:

1. OI-55, Primary Leak Rate Calculation

2. Technical Specifications Task Standards: Review and identify errors associated with OI 55 Primary Leak Rate Calculation and determine TSAC impact per OI-55.

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 5 of 14 I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

INITIAL CONDITIONS:

You are OS2.

Unit 1 is operating at stable full reactor power with indications of a primary leak.

The Letdown Gas Stripper (LDGS) is bypassed per OI 17, Letdown Gas Stripper Operation.

AOP-1A Unit 1 Reactor Coolant Leak was entered and is currently in progress.

The PAB AO has reported the following Charging Pumps seal leak rates:

1P-2A = 20 cc/min 1P-2B = 15 cc/min 1P-2C = 25 cc/min Steam Generator Tube Leakage (SGTL ) LRSGTL = 0 Reactor Component Leak Rate LRRC = 0 Non RCPB Leakage LRP3 = 0 The following plant parameters were observed at time 0400:

RCS Tavg 575.6 °F RCS T(Terr) 0 °F PZR Level 46.0 %

VCT Level 45.0 %

U1 PRT level 74.7%

U1 RCDT Level 52 %

The following plant parameters were observed at time 0420:

RCS Tavg 575.6 °F RCS T(Terr) 0 °F PZR Level 45.7%

VCT Level 43.8 %

U1 PRT level 74.7%

U1 RCDT Level 52.5 %

No borations, dilutions or diverts to HUT took place.

There is no Chemistry sampling in progress.

C04 has completed OI 55 through Attachment A, Primary Leak Rate Worksheet, up to Step 6.0 and has presented it to you for your review.

INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Review the Primary Leak Rate Worksheet Complete remaining steps of OI 55, Primary Leak Rate Calculation, starting at Step 5.6.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 6 of 14 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Start Time:

NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e., the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

Performance Step: 1 Attachment A Critical N 2.0 RECORD the following data:

RCS LEAK RATE DATA Standard: The examinee checks data accurately entered from the initial conditions and calculates the results.

Time change 20 minutes RC Terror (Terr) change is 0°F PZR Level change is 0.3 % = 19.47 gal.

VCT Level change is 1.2 % = 15.168 gal.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Performance Step: 2 Attachment A Critical N 2.0 RECORD the following data:

RMW AND BA ADDITIONS Standard: The examinee verifies that this step does not apply Evaluator Note: Per the initial conditions, no RMW or acid additions occurred.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 7 of 14 Performance Step: 3 Attachment A Critical N 2.0 RECORD the following data:

DIVERT Standard: The examinee verifies that this step does not apply Evaluator Note: Per the initial conditions, no diverts occurred.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Performance Step: 4 Attachment A Critical Y 3.0 Calculate RCS leak rate:

CALCUALTED RCS LEAK RATE Standard: The examinee calculates RCS leak rate of 1.732 gpm (1.725 to 1.735 gpm) and determines that recorded RCS leak rate is in error.

Evaluator Note: First error Time change of 30 min vice 20 min was used to calculate LRRCS.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 8 of 14 Performance Step: 5 Attachment A Critical N 4.0 CALCULATE RCS Unidentified Leak Rate as follows:

4.1 CALCULATE Identified RCS Leak Rate:

IDENTIFIED RCS LEAK RATE DATA Standard: The examinee checks data accurately entered from the initial conditions and calculates the results.

Time change 20 minutes PRT Level change 0 gpm The examinee calculates RCDT Level change of 0.088 gpm.

SG Tube Leakage (LRSGTL) 0 gpm Reactor Component Leak Rate (LRRC) 0 gpm Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Performance Step: 6 Attachment A Critical Y 4.0 CALCULATE RCS Unidentified Leak Rate as follows:

4.2 CALCULATE Non Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary :

Non Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Standard: The examinee calculates Charging Pump Seals (LRP2) of 0.016 gpm and determines the recorded value is in error.

Non RCPB Leakage (LRP3) 0 gpm Evaluator Note: Second error Charging pump seal leakage was miscalculated by a factor of 10.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate JPM Determination, Rev. 0 Page 9 of 14 Performance Step: 7 Attachment A Critical Y 4.0 CALCULATE RCS Unidentified Leak Rate as follows:

4.3 CALCULATE RCS Unidentified leakage:

UNIDENTIFIED RCS LEAK RATE Standard: Based on corrected values, the examinee recalculates Unidentified Leak Rate (LRUID) to be 1.628 gpm (1.625 to 1.635 gpm) rather than the original value of 0.909 gpm. (errors carried forward)

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Performance Step: 8 5.6 IF the Unit is in Mode 5, THEN perform Attachment B, Cold Critical N Shutdown Primary Leak Rate Worksheet as follows:

Standard: The examinee verifies that this step is not applicable.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Performance Step: 9 5.7 IF the plant is in Mode 1 through 4, AND Pressure Boundary Critical N leakage is detected, THEN ENTER Technical Specification LCO 3.4.13 Action Condition B.

Standard: The examinee verifies that the action condition entry is not required at this time.

Evaluator Cue: Relief crew is preparing for a containment entry to inspect for pressure boundary leakage.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

JPM PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate Page 10 of Determination, Rev. 0 14 Performance Step: 10 5.8 IF RCS Unidentified Leakage shows a significantly increasing trend, Critical N OR reaches 0.15 gpm, THEN PERFORM the following actions:

5.8.1 INFORM the Shift Manager and Duty Station Manager.

5.8.2 CHECK the following at least once per hour:

a. Containment particulate monitor (RE 211) high and low values.

b. Containment radiogas monitor (RE 212) high and low values.

c. Containment humidity.

5.8.3 PERFORM the RCS leakrate calculation of Section 5.5 or 5.6 as applicable at least once per shift.

5.8.4 OBTAIN a sump A sample and have Chemistry analyze to aid in determining the source of leakage.

5.8.5 DIRECT Chemistry to sample and analyze Containment atmosphere for hydrogen content and REPORT the results to the SM.

5.8.6 NOTIFY Engineering to review Containment Air Cooler performance and cleaning frequencies to determine if an adverse long term trend exists.

5.8.7 IF a containment inspection is warranted to localize the source of leakage, THEN the inspection should consist of the following:

a. Evidence of steam in containment.

b. Wetness on the floor.

c. Boric Acid deposits.

d. Abnormal packing or gasket leakage.

Note: A thorough examination should be performed of the reactor vessel head using binoculars or other methods allowed by RP.

e. Reactor vessel head locations as permitted by Health Physics.

Evaluator Cue: Shift Manager will have OS2 address actions contained in step 5.8 Standard: The examinee identifies actions required as listed by procedure Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

JPM PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate Page 11 of Determination, Rev. 0 14 Performance Step: 11 5.9 IF the RCS leak rate approaches 0.20 gpm and the cause is known, Critical N THEN the priority of the work order associated with the contributor SHALL be increased.

Standard: The examinee verfies that this step is not applicable because the cause of the leakage is unknown.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Performance Step: 12 5.10 IF the plant is in Mode 1 through 4, AND Unidentified Leakage Critical Y exceeds one gpm, THEN ENTER Technical Specification LCO 3.4.13 Action Condition.

Standard: The examinee identifies RCS unidentified leakage >1 gpm is in excess of limit for Technical Specifications LCO 3.4.13.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Performance Step: 13 5.11 IF Unidentified Leakage is greater than 1.0 gpm OR Identified Critical N Leakage is greater than 10 gpm, THEN INITIATE AOP 1A, Reactor Coolant Leak.

Standard: The examinee identifies that AOP 1A is already in effect, per initial conditions.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

JPM PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate Page 12 of Determination, Rev. 0 14 Performance Step: 14 5.12 IF the plant is in Mode 1 through 4, AND Identified Leakage Critical N exceeds 10 gpm, THEN ENTER Technical Specification LCO 3.4.13 Action Condition.

Standard: The examinee identifies RCS identified leakage is less than 10 gpm.

Performance: SATISFACTORY _____ UNSATISFACTORY _____

Comments:

Terminating Cues: JPM is complete.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

Stop Time:

JPM PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO, Review a RCS Leak Rate Page 13 of Determination, Rev. 0 14 Examinee: Evaluator:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT Date:

LOIT RO LOIT SRO PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

Remediation required: YES NO COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EXAMINER NOTE: ENSURE ALL EXAM MATERIAL IS COLLECTED AND PROCEDURES CLEANED, AS APPROPRIATE.

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

Filename: PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO Rev 0.doc TR-AA-230-1003-F10 Revision 1 Page 13 of 14

JPM JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 14 of 14 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

You are OS2.

Unit 1 is operating at stable full reactor power with indications of a primary leak.

The Letdown Gas Stripper (LDGS) is bypassed per OI 17, Letdown Gas Stripper Operation.

AOP-1A Unit 1 Reactor Coolant Leak was entered and is currently in progress.

The PAB AO has reported the following Charging Pumps seal leak rates:

1P-2A = 20 cc/min 1P-2B = 15 cc/min 1P-2C = 25 cc/min Steam Generator Tube Leakage (SGTL ) LRSGTL = 0 Reactor Component Leak Rate LRRC = 0 Non RCPB Leakage LRP3 = 0 The following plant parameters were observed at time 0400:

RCS Tavg 575.6 °F RCS T(Terr) 0 °F PZR Level 46.0 %

VCT Level 45.0 %

U1 PRT level 74.7%

U1 RCDT Level 52 %

The following plant parameters were observed at time 0420:

RCS Tavg 575.6 °F RCS T(Terr) 0 °F PZR Level 45.7%

VCT Level 43.8 %

U1 PRT level 74.7%

U1 RCDT Level 52.5 %

No borations, dilutions or diverts to HUT took place.

There is no Chemistry sampling in progress.

C04 has completed OI 55 through Attachment A, Primary Leak Rate Worksheet up to Step 6.0 and has presented it to you for your review.

INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Review the Primary Leak Rate Worksheet Complete remaining steps of OI 55, Primary Leak Rate Calculation, starting at Step 5.6.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

Filename: PBN JPM P119.223e.SRO Rev 0.doc TR-AA-230-1003-F10 Revision 1 Page 14 of 14

JPM JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 1 of 11 JPM TITLE: Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32 JPM NUMBER: PBN P119.203d.SRO REV. 1 TASK NUMBER(S) / P119.203.SRO TASK TITLE(S): Maintain Required Logs and Records K/A NUMBERS: 2.2.23 K/A VALUE: 4.6 Justification (FOR K/A VALUES <3.0): N/A TASK APPLICABILITY:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT OTHER:

APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING: Simulate/Walkthrough: Perform: X EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: X Other: X Lab:

Time for Completion: 20 Minutes Time Critical: NO Alternate Path [NRC]: No Alternate Path [INPO]: No Developed by:

Instructor/Developer Date Reviewed by:

Instructor (Instructional Review) Date Validated by:

SME (Technical Review) Date Approved by:

Training Supervision Date Approved by:

Training Program Owner Date

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 2 of 11 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?

2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?

3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?

4. Do the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?

5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?

6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?

7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?

8. Is the job level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?

9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?

10. Is justification provided for tasks with K/A values less than 3.0?

11. Have the performance steps been identified and classified (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

12. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?

13. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?

14. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

15. Are all critical steps supported by procedural guidance? (e.g., if licensing, EP or other groups were needed to determine correct actions, then the answer should be NO.)

16. If the JPM is to be administered to an LOIT student, has the required knowledge been taught to the individual prior to administering the JPM?

TPE does not have to be completed, but the JPM evaluation may not be valid if they have not been taught the required knowledge.

All questions/statements must be answered YES or N/A or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES or N/A, then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the initial validation shall sign and date the cover sheet.

Protected Content: (CAPRs, corrective actions, licensing commitments, etc. associated with this material)

{C001}

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 3 of 11 UPDATE LOG: Indicate in the following table any minor changes or major revisions (as defined in TR-AA-230-1003) made to the material after initial approval. Or use separate Update Log form TR-AA-230-1003-F16.

REASON FOR AR/TWR PREPARER DATE

1. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE CHANGE # SUPERVISOR DATE Rev. 0 New JPM Rev. 1 Updated for the 2017 NRC ILT Exam.

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 4 of 11 SIMULATOR SET-UP: (Only required for simulator JPMs)

SIMULATOR SETUP INSTRUCTIONS:

SIMULATOR MALFUNCTIONS:

SIMULATOR OVERRIDES:

SIMULATOR REMOTE FUNCTIONS:

Required Materials: TS 32, Miscellaneous Equipment Checks (Monthly) Unit 1 Calculator Steam Tables General

References:

TS 32, Miscellaneous Equipment Checks (Monthly) Unit 1 Task Standards: Identify discrepancies (two) not properly noted by the Control Operator, and determine that test results for CET based subcooling margin are NOT within acceptance criteria.

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 5 of 11 I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

INITIAL CONDITIONS:

Both Units are at rated power.

UNIT 1 PPCS Yellow Core Exit Thermocouple indications were acting erratically and have since been repaired.

PPCS is available.

CO3 just completed a partial TS 32, Miscellaneous Equipment Checks (Monthly) Unit 1, Attachment B, Calculations.

CO3 has just requested that you conduct the SRO review for the completed TS 32, Attachment B.

INITIATING CUES:

You are directed you to perform the SRO review of TS 32, Attachment B.

Evaluator Note: This JPM requires supplying a copy of TS 32 filled out up to the applicable steps of the procedure and Attachment A and B. Provide a calculator and steam tables if the JPM is not conducted in the simulator or control room.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 6 of 11 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Start Time:

NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e., the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

NOTE: Will need to provide the student with a copy of TS 32 completed through steps to conduct attachment A and B for the Yellow Subcooling channel on tan paper; and a calculator if one if not readily available.

Performance Step: 1 Reviews Procedure and Attachments Critical N Standard: The examinee reviews TS 32 prior to beginning calculation verification Evaluator Note: Provide a copy of TS 32 with required steps and Attachments A and B for Yellow Subcooling monitor being completed Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 7 of 11 Performance Step: 2 Reviews Attachment B calculations prior to signing that review is complete.

Critical N Standard: Reviews Attachment B calculations and determines that errors exist Evaluator Note: The next three JPM steps list the errors that are in the attachment, it is not critical that the errors be discovered in the order listed in the JPM, but all three must be identified.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 3 Reviews procedure step:

Critical Y 2.0 DETERMINE average Core Exit Thermocouple temperature for each channel:

b. T/C Yellow Channel.

Standard: The examinee determines that T/C Avg was calculated incorrectly.

The examinee calculates a correct value for T/C Avg of 604.4°F, and corrects the error carried forward to Steps 3.b. and 5.e. based on this result.

Evaluator Cue: If notified of error in calculation then acknowledge report and ask student to continue with performance of the procedure. The error may not be reported until review is completed.

Evaluator Note: For Step 2.b the acceptable range =603.7 to 604.8°F For Step 3.b and 5.e: °FSUBCOOLED = 49.7°F (Acceptable range = 49.3 to 50.4°F)

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 8 of 11 Performance Step: 4 Review procedure step:

Critical Y 5.0 PERFORM a channel check for Core Exit Thermocouple based subcooling margin:

Standard: The examinee determines that at Step 5.g. the wrong value was entered, and enters the correct value of 40.9°F from Table 2.

Evaluator Cue: If notified of error, then acknowledge report and ask student to continue with performance of the procedure. The error may not be reported until review is completed.

Evaluator Note: The incorrect value of 47.8 was taken from Subcooling Monitor (RTD) vice Subcooling Monitor(T/C) on Table 2.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 5 Review procedure step:

Critical Y 5.0 PERFORM a channel check for Core Exit Thermocouple based subcooling margin:

h. The difference between all three Yellow Channel values is less than or equal to 7.9°F (CIRCLE one) SAT / UNSAT Standard: The examinee determines that the difference between Yellow Channel values is greater than 7.9°F , and that the step is UNSAT.

Evaluator Cue: If notified of error in calculation then acknowledge report and ask student to continue with performance of the procedure. The error may not be reported until review is completed.

Evaluator Note: Once errors have been corrected for values at steps 5.e and 5.g, the examinee should identify a difference of 8.8°F.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 9 of 11 Performance Step: 6 Reports errors in calculations and asks for CO to review data and does not Critical N sign for calculation verification Standard: The examinee does not sign calculation verification until deficiencies are resolved Evaluator Cue: Acknowledge report Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Terminating Cues: That completes this JPM.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

Stop Time:

JPM PBN JPM P119.203d.SRO, Complete a Calculation Review of TS 32, Rev. 1 Page 10 of 11 Examinee: Evaluator:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT Date:

LOIT RO LOIT SRO PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

Remediation required: YES NO COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EXAMINER NOTE: ENSURE ALL EXAM MATERIAL IS COLLECTED AND PROCEDURES CLEANED, AS APPROPRIATE.

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

JPM JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 11 of 11 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

Both Units are at rated power.

UNIT 1 PPCS Yellow Core Exit Thermocouple indications were acting erratically and have since been repaired.

PPCS is available.

CO3 just completed a partial TS 32, Miscellaneous Equipment Checks (Monthly) Unit 1, Attachment B, Calculations.

CO3 has just requested that you conduct the SRO review for the completed TS 32, Attachment B.

INITIATING CUES:

You are directed you to perform the SRO review of TS 32, Attachment B.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Page 1 of 15 JPM TITLE: Review IT 90 TRAIN B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1 JPM NUMBER: PBN JPM P119.231.SRO REV. 0 TASK NUMBER(S) / PBN P119.231.SRO / Perform surveillances per the Plant Inspection TASK TITLE(S): Program K/A NUMBERS: 2.2.12 K/A VALUE: 3.7 / 4.1 Justification (FOR K/A VALUES <3.0):

TASK APPLICABILITY:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT OTHER:

APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING: Simulate/Walkthrough: Perform: X EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: Other: X Lab:

Time for Completion: 15 Minutes Time Critical: No Alternate Path [NRC]: No Alternate Path [INPO]: No Developed by:

Instructor/Developer Date Reviewed by:

Instructor (Instructional Review) Date Validated by:

SME (Technical Review) Date Approved by:

Training Supervision Date Approved by:

Training Program Owner Date TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 2 of 15 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?

2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?

3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?

4. Do the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?

5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?

6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?

7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?

8. Is the job level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?

9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?

10. Is justification provided for tasks with K/A values less than 3.0?

11. Have the performance steps been identified and classified (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

12. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?

13. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?

14. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

15. Are all critical steps supported by procedural guidance? (e.g., if licensing, EP or other groups were needed to determine correct actions, then the answer should be NO.)

16. If the JPM is to be administered to an LOIT student, has the required knowledge been taught to the individual prior to administering the JPM?

TPE does not have to be completed, but the JPM evaluation may not be valid if they have not been taught the required knowledge.

All questions/statements must be answered YES or N/A or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES or N/A, then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the initial validation shall sign and date the cover sheet.

Protected Content: (CAPRs, corrective actions, licensing commitments, etc. associated with this material)

{C001}

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 3 of 15 UPDATE LOG: Indicate in the following table any minor changes or major revisions (as defined in TR-AA-230-1003) made to the material after initial approval. Or use separate Update Log form TR-AA-230-1003-F16.

PREPARER DATE

1. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE REASON FOR CHANGE AR/TWR#

SUPERVISOR DATE Rev. 0 Developed for the 2017 NRC ILT Exam.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 4 of 15 SIMULATOR SET-UP: (Only required for simulator JPMs)

None SIMULATOR SETUP INSTRUCTIONS:

None SIMULATOR MALFUNCTIONS:

None SIMULATOR OVERRIDES:

None SIMULATOR REMOTE FUNCTIONS:

None Required Materials: Marked up copy (with errors) of IT 90 Train B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1 General

References:

IT 90 Train B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1 Task Standards: Identify the two inserted deficiencies during supervisory review of IT 90 Train B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1.

Assess test results to identify that the ADV is OPERABLE, but does not meet IST acceptance criteria, and initiate required actions.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 5 of 15 I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

INITIAL CONDITIONS:

You are OS1.

The third license just completed IT 90 Train B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1 and has requested that you perform the supervisory review prior to exiting TSAC 3.7.4.A.1.

INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Complete the supervisory review for IT 90 Train B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 6 of 15 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Start Time:

NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e., the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

Performance Step: 1 Review the cover page for accuracy and completeness:

Critical N Verified Current Copy List pages used for Partial Performance Controlling Work Document Numbers Standard: The examinee reviews the cover page and determines it is accurate and complete:

Verified Current Copy List pages used for Partial Performance Controlling Work Document Numbers Evaluator Note: Verified Current Copy (Signature / Date / Time correctly filled in)

List pages used for Partial Performance (None)

Controlling Work Document Numbers (as noted)

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 7 of 15 Performance Step: 2 Review Step 2.1 stopwatch data for accuracy and completeness:

Critical N ID No.

Calibration Due Date Standard: The examinee checks stopwatch data and notes that ID No. is filled in, and Calibration Due Date is NOT past due.

Evaluator Note: No errors with this step.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 3 Review Step 4.0, Initial Conditions for accuracy and completeness:

Critical N 4.1 This test is being done to satisfy:

IST Coordinator availability Permission to Perform Test Standard: The examinee reviews Step 4.0, Initial Conditions and notes that it is complete and accurate.

4.1 This test is being done to satisfy:

4.2 IST Coordinator availability 4.3 Permission to Perform Test Evaluator Note: No errors in this section.

4.1 This test is being done to satisfy: (Checked and includes Task Sheet No.)

4.2 IST Coordinator: N/A (not PMT) 4.3 Permission to Perform Test (Signature / Date / Time)

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 8 of 15 Performance Step: 4 Review Steps 5.1.1 through 5.1.6 for accuracy and completeness:

Critical N Date / time Pressures Initials IV initial Standard: The examinee reviews Steps 5.1.1 through 5.1.6 and notes they are accurate and complete.

Evaluator Note: No errors this section.

5.1.1 Date / Time 5.1.3 Value should be 800 psig 5.1.4 b Value should be 1050 psig 5.1.5 i Should be marked N/A 5.1.5 j Should be marked N/A 5.1.6 b Value should be 800 psig 5.1.6 d Value should be 1050 psig 5.1.6 m Should be marked N/A Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 5 Review Step 5.1.7 through 5.1.9 for accuracy and completeness:

Critical N Date / Time Initials IV initials Standard: The examinee reviews Step 5.1.7 through 5.1.9 and notes they are accurate and complete.

Evaluator Note: 5.1.9 Date / Time Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 9 of 15 Performance Step: 6 Review Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded in the Critical N table for Steps 5.1.5 b Control Room Time to OPEN Local Positon Indication Control Room Position Indication Standard: The examinee reviews Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded in the table for Steps 5.1.5 b and determines it is accurate and complete.

Control Room Time to OPEN Local Positon Indication Control Room Position Indication Evaluator Note: Control Room Time to OPEN (11.77)

Local Positon Indication (OPEN)

Control Room Position Indication (ON / OFF)

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 10 of 15 Performance Step: 7 Review Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded in the Critical N table for Steps 5.1.5 e.

Control Room Time to SHUT Local Positon Indication Control Room Position Indication Standard: The examinee reviews Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded in the table for Steps 5.1.5 e and determines it is accurate and complete.

Control Room Time to SHUT Local Positon Indication Control Room Position Indication Evaluator Note: Control Room Time to SHUT (34.56)

Local Positon Indication (SHUT)

Control Room Position Indication (OFF / ON)

The examinee may identify that Time to SHUT does not meet IST acceptance criteria. This will be critical for JPM Step 11.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 11 of 15 Performance Step: 8 Review Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded in the Critical Y table for Steps 5.1.6 g Control Room Time to OPEN Local Positon Indication Control Room Position Indication Standard: The examinee identifies the Step 5.1.6 g transposition error (entered value of OFF /

ON rather than the required value of ON / OFF).

Evaluator Note: Control Room Time to OPEN (11.78)

Local Positon Indication (OPEN)

Control Room Position Indication (OFF / ON), (First of two inserted errors.)

Evaluator Cue: If the examinee questions the CO about the incorrect valve position indication, report that the actual indication was Red Light ON and Green Light OFF.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 9 Review Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded in the Critical N table for Steps 5.1.6 i Control Room Time to SHUT Local Positon Indication Control Room Position Indication Standard: The examinee reviews Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded in the table for Steps 5.1.6 i and determines it is accurate and complete.

Control Room Time to SHUT Local Positon Indication Control Room Position Indication Evaluator Note: No errors this section.

Control Room Time to SHUT (34.48)

Local Positon Indication (SHUT)

Control Room Position Indication (OFF / ON)

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 12 of 15 Performance Step: 10 Review Attachment A, 1MS-2015 Valve Stroke Verification data recorded after the Critical Y table for:

LVFST Satisfied for all tested valves in Attachment A: (SAT / UNSAT)

IST Data Satisfied for all tested valves in Attachment A: (SAT / UNSAT)

Performer, Date / Time Remarks Standard: The examinee identifies that SAT was circled in error for the IST Data Satisfied for all tested valves in Attachment A.

Evaluator Note: LVFST Satisfied for all tested valves in Attachment A: (SAT circled)

IST Data Satisfied for all tested valves in Attachment A: (SAT circled) (Second of two inserted errors.)

Performer, Date / Time (Signature / Date / Time)

Remarks (Comment addressing IST out-of-spec for step 5.1.5 e)

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 13 of 15 Performance Step: 11 Completes Step 6.1: Operations Analysis Critical Y Standard: The examinee:

Completes Step 6.1.1 - signature / date / time Step 6.1.2 - marks step as N/A Step 6.1.3 - marks step as N/A Completes Step 6.1.4 - actions request submittal and IST Engineer notification Evaluator Cue: When the step is addressed, notify the SRO that the CO has written an AR.

AR # 1234567 When the step is addressed, notify the SRO that the IST Engineer has been informed of his required review.

Evaluator Note: The examinee should:

Identify Time to SHUT does not meet IST acceptance criteria, requiring performance of Step 6.1.4.

Give direction to generate an AR and Notify the IST Engineer.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Terminating Cues: The JPM is complete.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

Stop Time:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.231.SRO, Review Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve JPM Train B Unit 1, Rev. 0 Page 14 of 15 Examinee: Evaluator:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT Date:

LOIT RO LOIT SRO PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

Remediation required: YES NO COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EXAMINER NOTE: ENSURE ALL EXAM MATERIAL IS COLLECTED AND PROCEDURES CLEANED, AS APPROPRIATE.

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

JPM JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 15 of 15 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

You are OS1.

The third license just completed IT 90 Train B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1 and has requested that you perform the supervisory review prior to exiting TSAC 3.7.4.A.1.

INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Complete the supervisory review for IT 90 Train B, Atmospheric Steam Dump Valve Train B Unit 1.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Page 1 of 12 JPM TITLE: Review a Discharge Calculation (OI 140B)

JPM NUMBER: PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO REV. 0 TASK NUMBER(S) / PBN P119.223.SRO / Review completed procedures TASK TITLE(S):

K/A NUMBERS: 2.3.6 K/A VALUE: 3.9 / 4.2 Justification (FOR K/A VALUES <3.0):

TASK APPLICABILITY:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT OTHER:

APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING: Simulate/Walkthrough: Perform: X EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: Other: X Lab:

Time for Completion: 15 Minutes Time Critical: No Alternate Path [NRC]: No Alternate Path [INPO]: N0 Developed by:

Instructor/Developer Date Reviewed by:

Instructor (Instructional Review) Date Validated by:

SME (Technical Review) Date Approved by:

Training Supervision Date Approved by:

Training Program Owner Date TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 2 of 12 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?

2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?

3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?

4. Do the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?

5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?

6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?

7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?

8. Is the job level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?

9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?

10. Is justification provided for tasks with K/A values less than 3.0?

11. Have the performance steps been identified and classified (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

12. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?

13. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?

14. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

15. Are all critical steps supported by procedural guidance? (e.g., if licensing, EP or other groups were needed to determine correct actions, then the answer should be NO.)

16. If the JPM is to be administered to an LOIT student, has the required knowledge been taught to the individual prior to administering the JPM?

TPE does not have to be completed, but the JPM evaluation may not be valid if they have not been taught the required knowledge.

All questions/statements must be answered YES or N/A or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES or N/A, then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the initial validation shall sign and date the cover sheet.

Protected Content: (CAPRs, corrective actions, licensing commitments, etc. associated with this material)

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 3 of 12 UPDATE LOG: Indicate in the following table any minor changes or major revisions (as defined in TR-AA-230-1003) made to the material after initial approval. Or use separate Update Log form TR-AA-230-1003-F16.

PREPARER DATE

1. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE REASON FOR CHANGE AR/TWR#

SUPERVISOR DATE Rev. 0 Developed for the 2017 NRC ILT Exam.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 4 of 12 SIMULATOR SET-UP: (Only required for simulator JPMs)

SIMULATOR SETUP INSTRUCTIONS:

None SIMULATOR MALFUNCTIONS:

None SIMULATOR OVERRIDES:

None SIMULATOR REMOTE FUNCTIONS:

None Required Materials: OI 140B, Standard Radioactive Batch Liquid Release - Waste Distillate Tanks PBNP Liquid Waste Discharge Permit for the A Waste Distillate Tank CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 - Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water OI-38, Circulating Water System Operation TLB 23, Waste Distillate Tank T-104 A/B General

References:

OI 140B, Standard Radioactive Batch Liquid Release - Waste Distillate Tanks PBNP Liquid Waste Discharge Permit for the A Waste Distillate Tank CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 - Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water Task Standards: Review and identify the three errors on CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 - Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water associated with the discharge of the A Waste Distillate Tank.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 5 of 12 I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

INITIAL CONDITIONS:

You are the Shift Manager on mids A A Waste Distillate Tank discharge was recently completed on your shift and the paperwork was routed to you for review and approval.

INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Complete the Permit review by Shift Manager section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 - Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the A Waste Distillate Tank prior to routing to the Chemistry Manager.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 6 of 12 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Start Time:

NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e., the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

Performance Step: 1 Review Completed Prior to Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical N Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Initials for actual dilution flow Initials for number of Circulating Water pumps operating (2)

Initials and Date/Time for Shift Manager Review/Approval to Start Discharge Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed Prior to Discharge section for accuracy and completeness:

Initials for actual dilution flow Initials for number of Circulating Water pumps operating (2)

Initials and Date/Time for Shift Manager Review/Approval to Start Discharge Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 7 of 12 Performance Step: 2 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical N Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

The two Notes Ensure flow response option circled The initial flow calculation / data recorded in the box The final flow calculation / data recorded in the box.

Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for accuracy and completeness for the following:

The two Notes (circle / slashed)

Ensure flow response option (circled) - LW-15 Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 3 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical N Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Discharge START Date/Time and initials Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for the following:

Discharge START Date/Time and initials Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 4 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical N Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Discharge START Level and initials Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for the following:

Discharge START Levels and initials - 78%

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 8 of 12 Performance Step: 5 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical N Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Discharge STOP Date/Time and initials Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for the following:

Discharge STOP Date/Time and initials Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 6 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical N Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Discharge STOP Level and initials Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for the following:

Discharge STOP Level and initials Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 9 of 12 Performance Step: 7 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical Y Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Actual Discharge Volume (gal)

Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for the following:

Actual Discharge Volume (gal)

Determines that the recorded volume of 7410 gal is incorrect. The correct volume is 8610 gal.

Evaluator Note: The recorded volume of 7410 gal does not account for 1200 gal in the tank below the 0% level indication. See TLB 23 and OI-140B P&L 3.15. The actual volume discharged is 8610 gal.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 8 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical Y Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Actual Discharge Rate (gpm)

Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for the following:

Actual Discharge Rate (gpm)

AND Determines that the discharge rate calculation is NOT accurate.

Evaluator Note: The values used for both discharged volume and time are incorrect. Using the corrected value for volume discharged (JPM Step 7) and the correct time of 2 hr, 32 min (152 min) the Actual Discharge Rate is 56.6 gpm. [8610 gal / 152 min =

56.6 gpm]

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 10 of 12 Performance Step: 9 Review Completed During Discharge section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 -

Critical Y Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the following:

Actual Discharge Rate (gpm)

Standard: The examinee reviews the Completed During Discharge section for the following:

Actual Discharge Rate (gpm)

AND Determines that the corrected Actual Discharge Rate exceeds the Maximum Release Rate as specified on the Discharge Permit.

Evaluator Note: The corrected value for Actual Discharge Rate is 56.6 gpm is greater than the Maximum Release Rate of 50 gpm as specified on the Discharge Permit.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Terminating Cues: The JPM is complete.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

Stop Time:

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

PBN JPM P119.223d.SRO, Review a Discharge Calculation JPM (OI 140C), Rev. 0 Page 11 of 12 Examinee: Evaluator:

RO SRO STA Non-Lic SRO CERT Date:

LOIT RO LOIT SRO PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

Remediation required: YES NO COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EXAMINER NOTE: ENSURE ALL EXAM MATERIAL IS COLLECTED AND PROCEDURES CLEANED, AS APPROPRIATE.

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

JPM JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 12 of 12 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

You are the Shift Manager on mids A A Waste Distillate Tank discharge was recently completed on your shift and the paperwork was routed to you for review and approval.

INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Complete the Permit review by Shift Manager section of CAMP 031, Data Sheet 1 - Permits for Batch Discharge of Liquid Radioactive Water for the A Waste Distillate Tank prior to routing to the Chemistry Manager.

NOTE: Ensure the turnover sheet that was given to the examinee is returned to the evaluator.

TR-AA-230-1003-F10, Revision 2

SRO Admin JPM 5 (Emergency Plan)

PERFORM REQUIRED NOTIFICATIONS (Facility JPM Number: PBN JPM P119.214c.SRO)

Exam material withheld from public disclosure due to proprietary content.