DCL-14-081, Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2, Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 9, GEO.DCPP.TR.14.01 R0.Text.w.ITR

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:35, 9 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2, Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 9, GEO.DCPP.TR.14.01 R0.Text.w.ITR
ML14260A069
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2014
From:
Lettis Consultants International, Pacific Gas & Electric Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML14260A106 List: ... further results
References
DCL-14-081
Download: ML14260A069 (62)
v • d • e


Text

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COIVIPANY GE OSCIE N CES TE CH N ICAL REPORT PREPARED BY: {'.

VERIFIED BY: APPROVED BY:

Thompson Printed Name William Page Printed Name Printed Name Report Number: GEO. DCPI>.TR.l4.01 Report Revision:

Rev. 0 Rep o rt Date: 6/30/2014 Quality Related: Y Pagel of61 6ho DATE: ______ f __ 2 __ 1 ____ __ Lettis Consultants International, Inc. (LCI) Organization DATE: c. I'>? b-0/ t.j PG&E Geosciences Department Organization Organization

VERJFICATION

SUMMARY

REPORT I Item I Parameter 1 Purpose is clearly stated and the report satisfies the Purpose. 2 Data to be interpreted and/or analyzed are included or referenced.

3 Methodology is appropriate and properly applied. 4 A ss umptions are reasonable, adequately described, and based upon sound geotechnical p ri nciples and practices.

5 Software is identified and properly applied. Validation is referenced or included , and is acceptable.

Input files are correct. 6 Interpretation and/or Analysis is complete, accurate, and leads logically to Results and Conclusions.

7 Results and Conclusions are accurate, acceptable, and rea sona ble compared to the Data, interpretation and/or analysis, and Assumptions.

8 The Limitation on the use of the Results has been addressed and is accurate and complete.

9 The Impact Evaluation has been included and is accurate and complete. 10 References are valid for intended use. 11 Appendices are comp l ete, accurate, and support text. Page 1 of 1 GE O.DCPP.TR.l4.01 , Rev 0 A ttachm ent 1 Yes No* I N/A* X X ' X X X X X X X X X

  • Explain No" or N/A" entries. (For example, Items 3 t hru 7 would beN/A for a data report that simply presents the collected data.) As the ITR I spent two days in the field with a different mapping team each da y and confirmed that the project plan and instructions were being followed implemented correctly.

The overheating of the electronic field notepads (iPads) on hot days was corrected.

After completion of the initial draft report, my review found a number of inconsistencies that were noted by the PI, Steve Thompson, and then addressed. In particular, the planned specific cross sections were found not to be a valuable deli ve rable so we agreed to revise the work plan to change the deliverable to be the detailed geologic map so the interpretation team combining the geophysical data with the geology could construct cross sections at better locations.

f or my second rev iew of the rep ort I confirmed that all the previous issues had been corrected.

Durin g this review 1 found a few minor things that needed to be changed or revised. These have been completed as requested.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=DCL-14-081,_Diablo_Canyon_Units_1_and_2,_Central_Coastal_California_Seismic_Imaging_Project_(Cccsip)_Chapter_9,_GEO.DCPP.TR.14.01_R0.Text.w.ITR&oldid=869482"