DCL-14-081, Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2, Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 2, GEO.DCPP.TR.12.01 R1 Txt.W.Itr

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2, Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 2, GEO.DCPP.TR.12.01 R1 Txt.W.Itr
ML14260A035
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2014
From:
Moss Landing Marine Labs, Pacific Gas & Electric Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML14260A106 List: ... further results
References
DCL-14-081
Download: ML14260A035 (54)
v • d • e


Text

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CEOSCIENCES DRPARTMENT TE<;HNICAL REPORT IG A ORIES PREP /\RED R Y: H. Ga_ry_ Greene __ Printed Name VERIFIEDBY: Rictman Printed Name APPROVED BY: Report Number: GEO. DCPP.TR.12.01 Report Revision:

1 Report Dnte:09/02/20 14 Quality Relatctl:

Y Page 1 of 53 Moss Landing Mm ine Laboratories Organi7ation DATE* 5:rl-Z; 20/'f Consulting Geophysicist Organization

££J R, 'c_/({

I<_(, ',11c ?tt/!_ Printed Name Organi:;ration

GEOFORM.CF3.GE2.02 (05.02.13) INDEPENDENT VERIF I CAT I ON OF REPOR T Report GEO.DCPP.TR.l2.0 1, Rev. 1 P AGE 1 of 1 Attachment 1 REPORT VERIFICATION

SUMMARY

Item Parameter Yes No* N/A* I Purpose is clearly stated and the report satisfies the X Purpose. 2 Data to be interpreted and/or analyzed are included or X referenced.

3 Methodolog y is appropriate and properly applied. X 4 Assumptions are reasonable , adequatel y described, and X based upon sound geotechnical p rinciples and practices.

5 Software is identified and properly applied. Validatio n X is referenced or included , and is acceptable.

Input files are correct. 6 Interpretation and/or Analy s is is complete , accurate , X and leads logically to Results and Conclusions. 7 Results and Conclu s ions are accurate , acceptable, and X reasonable compared to the Data , interpretation and/o r analysis , and Assump t ions. 8 The Limitation on the use of the Results has b een X addressed and is accurate and complete. 9 \ The Impact Evaluation has been included and is X accurate and complete.

10 References are valid for intended use. x* 11 Appendices are complete, accurate, and support te x t. X

  • Explain "No" or " N/ A" entries. (For example , Items 3 thru 7 would beN/ A for a data report that simply presents the collected data.) Comments (use additional pages as necessary):

Comment 1: I was also one of the two ITRs for Re v. 0 of t hi s report. This IT R of Re v. 1 concentrated on the changes to the report and figures listed in the Re cord of Revisions on page 2 of this report. Thi s ITR also included review of th e tex t and figure edits provided by the PG&E Technical Editor. My comment s have bee n discu s sed w ith t he authors and subsequ en tly resol v ed. Comment 2: The appe n dix was prepared by F ugro Con s ultin g, Inc. (FCL) and subject to FCLs internal QA process and not separately re v ie w ed in this I TR. r;iffl_o;L; 1 (date) --------

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=DCL-14-081,_Diablo_Canyon_Units_1_and_2,_Central_Coastal_California_Seismic_Imaging_Project_(Cccsip)_Chapter_2,_GEO.DCPP.TR.12.01_R1_Txt.W.Itr&oldid=869544"