ML16341C638

DC Cook 2016 ES-201-2 Outline Quality Checklist

ML16341C638
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	12/02/2016
From:	NRC/RGN-III
To:	Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power
Shared Package
ML15274A374	List: ML16340B505 ML16340B553 ML16340B595 ML16340B643 ML16341C619 ML16341C638 ML16341C656
References
ES-201-2
Download: ML16341C638 (1)

Text

ES-201Examination Outline Quality ChecklistForm ES-201-2Facility:Date of ExaminationItemTask Descriptionlnitialsab-c#1.RITTENa.Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N5(Rb. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance wthSection D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.5lR,eBcAssess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics!5t,.Sd. Assess whether the justfcatons for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate.-t/1-fApB2.sIMULAToRUsing Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnormal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and majortransients.4YF4bAssess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number andmix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedulewithout compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using atleast one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenaros are duplicated from theapplicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days'1/4d'kc.To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s)quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 andconform(s) with the qualitative anddescribed in Appendix D"blA,f,'33.ALKTHRoUGHaVerify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:(t tne outlne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed, among the safety functions as specified on the form y'(Z tast< repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limts specified on the form./, Ø no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) .,/{øl the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form./,/<sl the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria ony'the form.i(ab. /erify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form{lD the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form/(Z) at least one task is new or significantly modified z i { i4Zl no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensingES-301 -1 :examinations ¿ '4/7{.8c. Determne if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ofapplicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.4l,(E4.GENERALa, Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in theappropriate exam sections.i6RGb. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.iW?,(?c. Ensure that KA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.,'(R$\d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.4>óRre. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.'t/;f'Rrgf. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).-1/>?rs)PrintedDate¿{ -tbq;ø-f¿'ttlt¿sl¿l-fu-¿'a. Authorb. Facility Reviewer (*)c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC Supervisorló# lndependent NRC reviewer initial* Not applicable for NRC-prepareditems in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence requiredexamination outlines.Note:C) roiN- yq$.*o P)r<tr.re*)-iA r4$.&- * *(a'^b,.la,ES-201, Page 26 of 28-a4P,r^ url.tnd-^ c-J-d,rf"-^ *J,-c;5.$p.ç