05000443/LER-2005-001, Regarding Noncompliance with the Requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.3

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:22, 15 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Regarding Noncompliance with the Requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.3
ML050810486
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook 
Issue date: 03/15/2005
From: Warner M
Florida Power & Light Energy Seabrook
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SBK-L-05051 LER 05-001-00
Download: ML050810486 (5)


LER-2005-001, Regarding Noncompliance with the Requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.3
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
4432005001R00 - NRC Website

text

-

.4 FPL Energy Seabrook Station FPL Energy P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 Seabrook Station (603) 773-7000 MAR 15 2005 Docket No. 50-443 SBK-L-05051 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Seabrook Station Licensee Event Report (LER) 2005-001-00 for Noncompliance with the Requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.3 Enclosed is Licensee Event Report (LER) 2005-001-00. This LER reports an event that occurred at Seabrook Station on January 15, 2005.. This event is being reported pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).

Should you require further information regarding this matter, please contact Mr. James M.

Peschel, Regulatory Programs Manager (603) 773-7194.

Very truly yours, FPL ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC Mark E. Warner Site Vice President 0

cc:

S. J. Collins, NRC Region I Administrator V. Nerses, NRC Project Manager, Project Directorate 1-2 G. T. Dentel, NRC Senior Resident Inspector 1vzin an FPL Group company

ENCLOSURE TO SBK-L-05051

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 06/30/2007

, the NRC may digits/characters for each block) and a person Is not required to respond to. the

______________________________________D______<

nformationcoltin

3. PAGE Seabrook Station 05000 443 1 OF 3
4. TITLE Noncompliance with the Requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.3
5. EVENT D TE
6. LER NUMBER
7. REPORT DATE I8.

OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED SQETA REFACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEUENTIAL REOV MONTH DAY YEAR N/A 05000 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 01 15 2005 2005 - 001 -

00 03 15 2005 N/A 05000

9. OPERATING MODE
11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR§: (Check all that apply) o 20.2201(b) 0 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C) 0 50.73(a)(2)(vii) 1 0 20.2201(d) 0 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 0 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) o 20.2203(a)(1) 0 20.2203(a)(4)

D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)

E 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) o 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 0 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(iii) a 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10. POWER LEVEL 0 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 0 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(x) o 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 0 50.36(c)(2) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A) 0 73.71(a)(4) o0 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 0 50.46(a)(3)(ii) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) 0 73.71(a)(5) 100 2

20.2203(a)(2)(v) l 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) 0 OTHER 0 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)

Specify In Abstract below

____or in (If more space is required, use additional copies of (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

IV. Corrective Action

An Operations Department Work Week Coordinator was assigned to work with the work week process to enhance the Operations Department review of work orders.

  • The Work Management manual will be revised to define the Operations Planner Work Week Coordinator responsibility in the Work Control Process.

V. Similar Events

None