ML20211P731
| ML20211P731 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/27/1999 |
| From: | Bollwerk G Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | Galante A NRC OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211N634 | List:
|
| References | |
| FRN-64FR24531, RULE-PR-1, RULE-PR-100, RULE-PR-110, RULE-PR-2, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-51, RULE-PR-52, RULE-PR-60, RULE-PR-62, RULE-PR-7, RULE-PR-72, RULE-PR-75, RULE-PR-76, RULE-PR-9 AG07-1, AG07-1-019, NUDOCS 9909140085 | |
| Download: ML20211P731 (1) | |
Text
^
- FJGo7-l
- pa ascoq'o UNITED STATES E' g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
~ f;g j ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING DOARD PANEL g WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555-0001
- January 27,1999 l
l l
MEMORANDUM TO: Anthony J. Galante ChiefInformation Officer FROM: G. Paul Bollwerk, lll h a [N(, Q Acting Chief Administrative Judge
SUBJECT:
FOLLOW-UP TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT FINAL i RULE TO DISCONTINUE NRC LOCAL PUBLIC l DOCUMENT ROOM PROGRAM AND TO ANNOUNCE ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY OF NRC PUBLIC RECORDS I
l On January 26,1999, I attended a meeting convened by OClO Information Management Division (IMD) Director Lynn Scattolini to discuss the respective January 8 and 15,1999 ASLBP and OGC comments on the draft final rule to discontinue the NRC Local Public Document Room (LPDR) program. During that
! meeting, which also was attended by Branch Chief Russell Powell and Sandra Northern of the IMD Information Serdes Branch; Deputy Assistant General Counsel Chip Cameron; and ASLBP Chief Counsel Lee Dewey, it was agreed that the draft rule
( should be revised to:
(1) become a proposed rule with the forty-five day public comment period l suggested by OGC; and l (2) to make it clear that when ADAMS is implemented and microfiche record production is discontinued, the current LPDRs would be offered the
, opportunity to keep the existing document collections, including l NRC-supplied paper documents, microfiche collections, and microfiche readers.
It also was agreed that several copies of the complete pre-ADAMS microfiche l collections would be retained by NRC and stored for use in future adjudicatory or other l proceedings. These NRC historical document collections would be made available for use in instances when local access to such a collection would aid the efficient conduct
, of the proceeding.
When the draft rule is revised, we would be pleased to review it and provide additional comments.
cc: L. B. Scattolini, OCIO R. A. Powell, OClO S. S. Northern, OClO /
F. X. Cameron, OGC 9909140085 990908 PDR PR
! 1 64FR24531 PDR 0N L 77U)/V000'