ML20211P866
ML20211P866 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 02/25/1999 |
From: | Racquel Powell NRC |
To: | Paul Bollwerk, Cameron F, Dewey L NRC |
Shared Package | |
ML20211N634 | List:
|
References | |
FRN-64FR24531, RULE-PR-1, RULE-PR-100, RULE-PR-110, RULE-PR-2, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-51, RULE-PR-52, RULE-PR-60, RULE-PR-62, RULE-PR-7, RULE-PR-72, RULE-PR-75, RULE-PR-76, RULE-PR-9 AG07-1, AG07-1-023, NUDOCS 9909140123 | |
Download: ML20211P866 (1) | |
Text
si Sandra Northern ,10 CFR Rsvision ra: Closura of LPDRs and ADAMS ' Page 1 Acro H ,
From: Russell Powell To: Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date: Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM i
Subject:
10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS I have made revisions to the rule regarding closure of the LPDRs to address your concerns per our meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).
A clean version cf the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concems or if you have additional comments.
.Thanks.
Russ CC: . Northern, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn 9909140123 990908 .
~f{. y}.h). -
()S
i t" * --C h,.i- 10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs rnd ADAMS Pige 1 ]
yugRj
. n,. -
3% -
go.oy-j \
From: Russell Powell
. To: . Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date: Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM s
' Sut$sct: 10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS j
, ' I have made revisions to the rule regarding blosure of the LPDRs to address your concems per our
. meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).
. ~ A clean version of the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concerns or if you have additional comments.
~
ggThanks.
i
, , Russ-CC: Northem, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn ak44 Powe3\ cecewed eca 4romL\\werk gwM3 % o v's .
k hi [
_