ML20211P866

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 10CFR Rev Re Closure of Lpdrs & ADAMS Per Meeting. Revs Have Been Made to Rule Concerning Closure of Lpdrs
ML20211P866
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/25/1999
From: Racquel Powell
NRC
To: Paul Bollwerk, Cameron F, Dewey L
NRC
Shared Package
ML20211N634 List:
References
FRN-64FR24531, RULE-PR-1, RULE-PR-100, RULE-PR-110, RULE-PR-2, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-51, RULE-PR-52, RULE-PR-60, RULE-PR-62, RULE-PR-7, RULE-PR-72, RULE-PR-75, RULE-PR-76, RULE-PR-9 AG07-1, AG07-1-023, NUDOCS 9909140123
Download: ML20211P866 (1)


Text

si Sandra Northern ,10 CFR Rsvision ra: Closura of LPDRs and ADAMS ' Page 1 Acro H ,

From: Russell Powell To: Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date: Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM i

Subject:

10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS I have made revisions to the rule regarding closure of the LPDRs to address your concerns per our meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).

A clean version cf the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concems or if you have additional comments.

.Thanks.

Russ CC: . Northern, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn 9909140123 990908 .

PDR PR 1 64FR24531 PDR

~f{. y}.h). -

()S

i t" * --C h,.i- 10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs rnd ADAMS Pige 1 ]

yugRj

. n,. -

3% -

go.oy-j \

From: Russell Powell

. To: . Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date: Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM s

' Sut$sct: 10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS j

, ' I have made revisions to the rule regarding blosure of the LPDRs to address your concems per our

. meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).

. ~ A clean version of the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concerns or if you have additional comments.

~

ggThanks.

i

, , Russ-CC: Northem, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn ak44 Powe3\ cecewed eca 4romL\\werk gwM3 % o v's .

k hi [

_