|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20077M5791995-01-0303 January 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Np Reactors.Expresses Concern Over Basis for Pr Not Recognizing Improvements in Outage Planning,Flawed Regulatory Analysis & Unneeded Restrictions ML20077G2991994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re NPP License Renewal,Proposed Amends.Util Believes That Amends as Modified by NEI Comments Will Lead to Stable & Predictable License Renewal Process ML20059F6161994-01-0404 January 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPP ML20059J6831993-10-27027 October 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR171 Re Restoration of Generic Exemption from Annual Fees for Nonprofit Educational Institutions ML20100Q7351992-03-13013 March 1992 Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Geis,Particularly Comments Re Continued Rights of States to Regulate Utilities Based on state-level Economic Objectives,Energy Needs & Mix of Generation Requirements ML20090J8411992-03-10010 March 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel ML20073B3211991-04-15015 April 1991 Comment Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.55a.Retaining Requirements of Subsection Iwv for Leakage Rate Analysis & Corrective Action for Specific Valve Is Not Necessary ML20066A0981990-12-20020 December 1990 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Erds.Nrc Adoption of Cumbersome Hardware & Software Design to Establish ERDS Link Connection Discouraging ML20058G0311990-10-23023 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re License Renewal for Nuclear Power Plants ML20062B0841990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Supports Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML19353B2021989-12-0101 December 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Although Draft Closely Resembles Rev 1 to INPO 85-038,some Aspects Overly Prescriptive ML20236A5341989-03-0909 March 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Recent Improvements in Qualifications & Training Adequately Addresses Safety ML20235V7721989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint at Nuclear Plants.Supports NUMARC Comments.Rule Unnecessary to Improve Maint at Nuclear Power Plants & Will Be Detrimental to Plants W/Effective Maint Programs ML20235P1271989-02-13013 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educational & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235N6971989-02-10010 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Proposed Degree Requirement.No Specific Data to Indicate That Rule Will Improve Plant Safety Exists ML20206M7961988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program,Per NUMARC Comments.Addl Comments Provided ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process ML20195E6031988-10-27027 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Disposal of Waste Oil by Incineration.Proposed Rule Would Provide Several Benefits,Including Reservation of Limited Capacity in Licensed Disposal Sites for Wastes W/Higher Activities ML20205N0471988-10-20020 October 1988 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Extension of Time for Implementation of Decontamination Priority & Trusteeship Provisions of Property Insurance Requirements.Util Requests Response to ML20154P1391988-09-0202 September 1988 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking 50-51 Re Property Insurance for NRC Licensed Power Plants ML20154N9961988-08-22022 August 1988 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking 50-51 Re Property Insurance for NRC Licensed Power Plants.Nrc Urged to Accept Petition & Grant Relief Requested ML20154G7481988-04-15015 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Employee Not Announcing or Otherwise Communicating to Other Persons Arrival & Presence of NRC Inspector.Rule Will Introduce Unintended Antagonism in Nrc/Licensee Relationship ML20154H4981988-03-29029 March 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of ANSI/ANS-56.8-1987 to Calculate Containment Leakage Rates ML19270H1541979-05-24024 May 1979 Answer to 790430 Notice of Hearing.Util Will Appear Before Administrative Law Judge & Present Evidence.No Matl Facts Are in Dispute.No Violations Occurred & No Civil Penalties Can Be Imposed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19270H1521979-05-24024 May 1979 Notice of Appearance on Behalf of Util.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19276E5211979-02-0808 February 1979 Resolution Opposing Const of Nuclear Power Plant in Putnam County,Due to Safety & Environ Reasons ML19263C6321978-12-26026 December 1978 State of Wi Answers to Licensee'S First Set of Interrogatories.Responds to Interrogatories 1-22,except for Interrogatory 5 Re Proposed Increase in Spent Fuel Storage ML19259B0391978-12-19019 December 1978 Licensee Response to Interrogatories Submitted by Wi. Interrogatories Concern Radioactive Releases,Integrity & Burnup of Spent Fuel.Affidavit & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19289C3491978-12-15015 December 1978 Responses by Intervenors Lakeshore Citizens for Safe Energy to NRC Interrogatories Re ASLB Questions.Asserts That Licensee Evaluation Is Inadequate Since There Is No Separate Monitoring of the Spent Fuel Pool ML19289C3221978-12-13013 December 1978 Provides Notice That SA Bast Withdraws Her Name from Mail & Svc List in Proceeding.All Further Correspondence Should Be Addressed to W Cordaro,1412 New York Avenue,Manitowoc,Wi ML20062F9431978-12-0101 December 1978 St of Wi'S Answers to NRC Staff'S First Set of Interrogs & Request for Production of Documents.St Does Not Anticipate Utilizing in Its cross-exam Any Documents Not Already Listed by Staff & Applicant Wips.Cert of Svc Encl ML20062F9321978-11-30030 November 1978 Interrogs Propounded by St of Wi to Applicants Wips,Wi Pwr & Light & Madison Gas & Elec Re Appl to Mod Spent Fuel Pool. Interrogs Concern Contentions 2 & 13 ML20062F9391978-11-30030 November 1978 Interrogs Propounded by St of Wi to NRC Staff.Interrogs Concern Staff'S Position Re Tech Merit of Each of Intervenor'S Admitted Contentions ML20062F4191978-11-28028 November 1978 Response by Intervenors Bast & W Schaefer to NRC Staff'S First Set of Interrogs.Cert of Svc Encl ML20062F7641978-11-28028 November 1978 Intervenors Responses to Licensees' First Set of Interrogs a Thermo-Inversion Around the Plant Sites May Cause a Higher Level of Radiat to Be present.Thermo-Inversion Prevents Emissions Escaping to Higher Atmosphere.Cert of Svc Encl ML20062E9271978-11-20020 November 1978 Licensee Wi Pub Svc First Set of Interrogs to & Request for Production of Documents From,Intervenors Lace & St of Wi. Interrogs Concern,Inter Alia,Identification of Intervenors Contentions & Presentation of Evidence ML20062D7251978-11-13013 November 1978 Notice of W/Drawal by J Lawrence as Counsel Representing NRC in Proc Re Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity at Subj Facil.Future Correspondence Should Be Addressed to W Olmstead.Cert of Svc Encl ML20062E7091978-11-11011 November 1978 Interrogs Submitted by Intervenor Lacse to Applicant Wpsc Re Lacse Contentions on Such Topics as Radioactive Emissions, Experiments on Deterioration of Neutron Absorber Plates & Removal of Radioactive Wastes.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062E2031978-11-0909 November 1978 NRC Request for Production of Documents from & Interrogs to State of Wi Re Planned Testimony & Witnesses ML20062E1311978-11-0909 November 1978 NRC Staff Interrogs to & Request for the Production of Documents from Intervenors Lakeshore Citizens for Safe Energy/Safe Haven Ltd ML20062E0841978-11-0909 November 1978 NRC Staff Interrogs To,& Request for Production of Documents From,Intervenors Citizens for Safe Energy/Safe Haven Ltd. Interrogs Concern Testimony to Be Presented,Admitted Contentions & ASLB Questions 1995-01-03
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20077M5791995-01-0303 January 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Np Reactors.Expresses Concern Over Basis for Pr Not Recognizing Improvements in Outage Planning,Flawed Regulatory Analysis & Unneeded Restrictions ML20077G2991994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re NPP License Renewal,Proposed Amends.Util Believes That Amends as Modified by NEI Comments Will Lead to Stable & Predictable License Renewal Process ML20059F6161994-01-0404 January 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPP ML20059J6831993-10-27027 October 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR171 Re Restoration of Generic Exemption from Annual Fees for Nonprofit Educational Institutions ML20100Q7351992-03-13013 March 1992 Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Geis,Particularly Comments Re Continued Rights of States to Regulate Utilities Based on state-level Economic Objectives,Energy Needs & Mix of Generation Requirements ML20090J8411992-03-10010 March 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel ML20073B3211991-04-15015 April 1991 Comment Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.55a.Retaining Requirements of Subsection Iwv for Leakage Rate Analysis & Corrective Action for Specific Valve Is Not Necessary ML20066A0981990-12-20020 December 1990 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Erds.Nrc Adoption of Cumbersome Hardware & Software Design to Establish ERDS Link Connection Discouraging ML20058G0311990-10-23023 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re License Renewal for Nuclear Power Plants ML20062B0841990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Supports Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML19353B2021989-12-0101 December 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Although Draft Closely Resembles Rev 1 to INPO 85-038,some Aspects Overly Prescriptive ML20236A5341989-03-0909 March 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Recent Improvements in Qualifications & Training Adequately Addresses Safety ML20235V7721989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint at Nuclear Plants.Supports NUMARC Comments.Rule Unnecessary to Improve Maint at Nuclear Power Plants & Will Be Detrimental to Plants W/Effective Maint Programs ML20235P1271989-02-13013 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educational & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235N6971989-02-10010 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Proposed Degree Requirement.No Specific Data to Indicate That Rule Will Improve Plant Safety Exists ML20206M7961988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program,Per NUMARC Comments.Addl Comments Provided ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process ML20195E6031988-10-27027 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Disposal of Waste Oil by Incineration.Proposed Rule Would Provide Several Benefits,Including Reservation of Limited Capacity in Licensed Disposal Sites for Wastes W/Higher Activities ML20205N0471988-10-20020 October 1988 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Extension of Time for Implementation of Decontamination Priority & Trusteeship Provisions of Property Insurance Requirements.Util Requests Response to ML20154P1391988-09-0202 September 1988 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking 50-51 Re Property Insurance for NRC Licensed Power Plants ML20154N9961988-08-22022 August 1988 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking 50-51 Re Property Insurance for NRC Licensed Power Plants.Nrc Urged to Accept Petition & Grant Relief Requested ML20154G7481988-04-15015 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Employee Not Announcing or Otherwise Communicating to Other Persons Arrival & Presence of NRC Inspector.Rule Will Introduce Unintended Antagonism in Nrc/Licensee Relationship ML20154H4981988-03-29029 March 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of ANSI/ANS-56.8-1987 to Calculate Containment Leakage Rates 1995-01-03
[Table view] |
Text
_
.,. o.
-empr. . .
r300EI p.e:cn ,
N .kh k ~kO:
J February 13, 1989 h kbS : g.U 2405 Josten Park Drive Green Bay, WI 54311 89 FEB 17 P1 :51 Secretary of the Commission US Nuclear Regulatory Commission on ..
, Washington, D.C. 20555 Docs ., o Attn: Docketing and Service Branch
Dear Sir:
I wish to comment on the proposed rule that would be added to 10CFR Parts 50 and 55 concerning degree requirements for Senior Reactor Operators and Shift Managers.
y' I am a Senior Reactor Operator, currently holding a Shift Supervisor's position at the Kewaunee Station.
I read the proposed rule with much interest and resulting in much apprehension and confusion. I simply don't understand how an individual holding a degree is going to enhance public health and safety. I believe quite the opposite to be true.
First of all, an individual with a degree is going to demand significantly higher wages to cope with the stress that inexperience brings, along with the unaccustomed stresses of a person new to shiftwork. This will result in costing the utilities more money.. Secondly, if I were degreed, I would want to put nly two or three years in the position to get the notation on my resume, then get out and move on. This, by the way, is the attitude of many of the degreed engineers we have on site. This kind of attitude and lack of experience is going to enhance public health and safety?
What a degreed individual in a Shift Manager's position would get for you is instant credibility. A degreed individual would probably look better to someone not knowing the depth of training we get.
As for a line of promotion from the Control Room to the Board Room, our Company already promotes those individuals who have taken the time and effort i to get their degrees and their SR0's. I feel very secure knowing my concerns are dealt with in a knowledgeable manner. l I like my job. I have over six years in the position of Shift Supervisor.
Because I don't have a degree, I can devote my time to the issues at hand j rather than spending time obtaining a degree and jockeying for position to i get in line for a promotion. Obtaining a degree at this time in my life ]
would simply not be feasible.
Before being promoted to Shift Supervisor, I spent eight years as a Control Room Operator and before that I participated in virtually every phase of the start-up of the plant from the time the first breaker was closed. I also watched as the plant was being built and followed progress of system after system being placed on line.
8903020109 890213 PD9 PR 50 53FR52716 PDR
, l 4
February 13, 1989 Page 2 I have seen many problems and how problems were resolved. I shared with our neighbors in celebrating 10 years on the line, remembering the gratitude the Company continues to show for its employees. We all have shared in the glory when we received high SALP ratings from the NRC and INP0's Award of Excellence.
I *eally don't understand how a degreed individual on shift is going to enhance professionalism. Yes, I hear about some of the other plants which you folks have had to come down hard on for displaying non-professional behavior. Seems to me, though a degree on shift will have nothing to do with lessening these instances. Positive management initiatives will.
From my perspective, what the NRC would lose by this rulemaking would out-weigh the benefits gained. You would lose something very valuable in this industry - experience. I feel strongly that, because of environmental concerns, our country is going to have to change its energy policy and bring the new generation of nukes on the line within the next 10 or 20 years.
One more mishap would seriously threaten that evolution. Let's keep our plants safe - this proposed rule must go!
Additionally, I invite any of the Commissioners to come to Kewaunee, sit along side me as I- go through my 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> on shift. Come along to requalification class with us and stand along side of us as we work through our scenerios on the Simulator. Stay with us for a couple of six-week cycles. Watch us work together as a team. I'd like any of you to point out how we are non-professional after that time and how a degreed person would be better qualified to run the shift.
Kewaunee will be going into its 14th refueling cycle soon. Its management policies have worked well for over 18 years. We have made this world we live in a little better place to live by delivering low cost, efficient, reliable, pollution-free energy to the citizens of Wisconsin.
We want to keep it that way!
WW Y hf Glenn W. Hoppe Shift Supervisor Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant i
ma
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _