ML19289C349

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responses by Intervenors Lakeshore Citizens for Safe Energy to NRC Interrogatories Re ASLB Questions.Asserts That Licensee Evaluation Is Inadequate Since There Is No Separate Monitoring of the Spent Fuel Pool
ML19289C349
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/1978
From: Bast S
LAKESHORE CITIZENS FOR SAFE ENERGY
To:
Shared Package
ML19289C350 List:
References
NUDOCS 7901120069
Download: ML19289C349 (1)


Text

?

I e'

t M

nnam CDIULESPONDENCE S

300%

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

/

T s pcCd'qt NUCLEAR R2GULATORY COMMISSION ll;

      • s 4

h h,\\s j/

s s',%'

' ~

BEFORE THE ATOMIC S?.T29Y AND LICENSIKG 6.LA2D Q

v 7

b In the Matter of

=

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Wisconsin Power and Light Company Docket No. 50-305

& Madison Gas and Electric Company (Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant, License No. DPR-43 TNTERV2NORS' RESPONSES TO NRC STAFF'S INTERh0GATORIES RELATING TO BOARD QUESTIONS

1. If a total loss of cooling capability did occur,it is possible that the remedial actions taken may not prove adequate, k
2. Yes.

The basis of our position /that the licensee's evaluation of the occupational dose associated with the installation or operation of the pool as modified is inadequate because there is no separate monitoring of the spent fuel pool.

A separate system needs to be installed to just measure radioactivity from the Spent Fuel: pool.

I, Sandra 3ast. swear that I have answered the above questions.

T f

m cc:

Robert M. Lazo Glenn 0. Bright Oscar H. Paris Jane Schaefer Mary Lou Jacobi Patrick Valsh Steven 3. Keane Atomic Safety and Licensing Board William J. Olmstad Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Docketing and Service Section G

7 9 0112 0 O C,9