ML20246J708

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:00, 12 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Trip Rept of 890619-23 Visit to Plant & Training for Unescorted Site Access to Nonradiological & Radiological Areas.Training Completed by Passing Two Exams
ML20246J708
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/1989
From: Alexion T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hannon J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8907170432
Download: ML20246J708 (5)


Text

___

I'i - July 12, 1989  !

o

,s.

  • MEMORANDUM T0: John N. Hannon, Director DISTRIBUTION: i Project Directorate III-3 jDocketeFiles5 PKreutzer Division of Reactor Projects - III, NRC & Local PDRS RHall ,

IV, Y and Special Projects PDIll-3 r/f TAlexion i

, FROM: Thomas W. Alexion, Project Manager 0GC l Project Directorate III-3 EJordan Division of Reactor Projects - III, ACRS(10)  :

IV, Y and Special Projects JClifford

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CALLAWAY SITE VISIT DURING JUNE 19-23, 1989 During June 19-23, 1989, I visited the Callaway Plant. I started the week by receiving training for unescorted site access to the nonradiological and ,

radiological areas of the plant. The training was a refresher and was completed by passing two examinations.

I toured the plant several times (once with Region III and NRR management) including areas such as turbine building, control building, auxiliary

' building and fuel building. Housekeeping was generally good with the exception of an oil leak in the safety injection / charging pump room, minor cleanup needed at the base of the diesel generators, and several carts with instrumentation that cluttered up the fuel building ventilation room.

Region III management said that the plant was in good shape with respect to contamination considering that a major refueling / modification-outage had just been completed.

The licensee brieted the NRC management and staff on their recent refueling /

modification outage. The licensee initiated outage shift managers for .

round-the-clock supervision of outage activities. The licensee completed 100% eddy-currert inspection of 2 steam generators, removed all 5 stuck reactor vessel studs, replaced all hafnium rod cluster control assemblies (RCCA's)withsilver-indium-cadmiumRCCA's, installed 52designcharges, monitored 672 locations for piping erosion and replaced piping as needed, and trained the operators for the major design changes. The major design changes include the steam generator 10-10 level trip setpoint time delay and environmental allowance modifier (lead plant), the conoseal assembly modifi-cation, the ATWS mitigating system actuation circuitry (AMSAC), the RHR autoclosure interlock removel, and the positive moderator temperature coefficient. The licensee was proud that its outage lasted only 53 days and that it has the shortest average duration of Westinghouse 4-loop unit refuelin average)g outages (8.2 weeks for Callaway compared to 16.6 weeks industry During the course of the week, I audited selected 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluations of changes approved and implemented at Callaway. The items audited were selected from modifications made during the recent refueling 0 \

8907170432 890712 / #

I DR ADOCK0500jp3

j John N. Hannon outage and other items from the licensee's latest annual 10 CFR 50.59 report dated June 1, 1989, and are discussed in the Enclosure. The auditing consisted of reviewing the change description, the 50.59 and nuclecr safety evaluation discussions, and other applicable areas as needed (FSAR, P&ID's, discussionswithengineeringstaff,examinationofhardware,etc.). None of the items audited were determined to require additional review by the NRC technical staff and no violations of 10 CFR 50.59 were identified.

l I accompanied an SRO (Dave Fitzgerald) on shift starting at 7:00 AM (for l about 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />). Dave's shift began in the control room by signing off on various work activities that were scheduled for that day, and discussing the more important items with the shift supervisor (also an SRO). Following the various sign-offs and a check of plant status in the control room (the plant was operating at 100% pover with no major problems, one diesel generator was out of service for maintenance activities (72-hour LCO), ano there was 0.6 gpm unidentified primcry system leakage (1 spm tech spec limit)), Dave and I toured the plant. Some of the areas toured included the inoperable diesel generator to ensure that the maintenance activities were proceeding on schedule, the auxiliary building, the turbine building (three of the turbine throttle valves were full-open and the fourth valve was in a throttled position), the service water building with particular attention to primary and secondary water cheniistry, and a walk around the plant including observations of the CST, RWST, and other storage tanks. Upon arrival back in the control room, the shift supervisor requested that Dave enter containment for about an hour to try to find the source of the unidentified primary system leakage, which was also causing a higher than normal noble gas activity inside containment. After a 20-minute briefing with health physics (HP), Dave and I (and two HP techs) entered containment. The search for the leakage consisted of a visual leakage search and a localized high noble gas activity search. The search was conducted on several elevation levels around the reactor vessel with particular attentico to the pressurizer. No leakage was found. Dave briefed the shift supervisor and then briefed the plant staff at the licensee's 12:30 PM daily n.eeting, regarding the negative finoing.

The containment interior appeared to be in very good orcer with respect to housekeeping and cleanliness. The HP techs surveyed inspection areas at Dave's direction before Dave and I entered a particular area. The HP techs had available and were using procedures for the containment entry.

On June 23, 1989, I attended the Callaway Plant on-site review committee meeting. Issues addressed include procedural changes, FSAR changes, design modifications, incident reports and future technical specification change applications. The committee also reviewed a draft LER discussing the reactor trip on May 29, 1989, when I & C personnel inadvertently allowed two leads to come in contact when hooking up flukes to power range instrumentation to do flux maps. The committee decided they needed additional details to make sure the LER correctly characterizes the root cause in terms of personnel error, procedural inadequacy or design deficiency, or some combination of causes.

l l

L

g . .

l John H. Hannon 1 1

Prior to leaving on June 23, 1989, I received a whole body count. My noble gas activity was reading higher than normal. The HP technician initially could not understand this, because I had entered containment on June 22 j 1989, and had not been in the RCA since then. 'The cause was later found to -

be that the containment was vented on the morning of June 23, 1989, through the unit vent. I was impressed that the HP tech asked me to stick around I (for about 40 minutes) until he understood why rqy noble gas activity was

  • i higher than normal, even though the level of activity apparently was not I high enough to be a safety concern. i

\

I feel I had a very productive week from a Project Manager's perspective and appreciated the licensee's hospitality and openness. There also appears to be a good deal of mutual respect between the licensee and the NRC.

/s/

Thomas W. Alexion, Project Manager Project Directorate III-3 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects

Enclosure:

As stated {

cc: B. Little, RIII C. Brown, RIII Office: II 3 PM/ - '

PD P III-3 Surname: LA/PDl'rer PKreat TAlexiori g JHannon Date:

7 [ .7 /89 7 / {L/89 g//t,/89

q.' .

ENCLOSURE 1.' Logic Change to Fuel Oil Transfer Pumps - Refuel 3 (CMP 88-1004)'

The-' logic for the emergency fuel oil transfer pumps was char.ged so.that the pumps will run continuously when their associated diesel generator is anning. Other associated changes were also made. .The emergency fuel n.i pumps, which supply fuel. oil from the storage tank to the day tank, p were cycling on and off every 1 to 2 minutes to maintain fuel' level l

between an upper and lower day tank level while the diesel generators are running. By running the pumps continuously, which is the modification, stress on the motors / pumps is reduced and reliability is improved. The licensee's written basis appears to be. technically correct and the 10 CFR  ;

' 50.59 questions were considered by the licensee in the safety evaluation,  !

and resulted in the addition:of new vent lines from the top of the day tank standpipes to the existing day tank vent lines so that unacceptable vacuum would not be drawn in the storage tank in the event of an inoperable storage tank vent.

2. Modify Conoseal Design - Refuel. 3 (CMP 88-1115)

The function of the core exit thermocouple nozzle assembly (CETNA) is to provide a method of establishing the reactor coolant pressure boundary at the exit point of the thermocouple column from the vessel head. The old (W) CETNA design required about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> each to assemble (there are four such CETNA's on the vessel head). The new (CE) CETNA requires about 15 ,

minutes to assemble. Also, the new design allows the lower conoseal to be 1 left assembled during hecd removal and reinstallation. In addition, the  !

old design seated the upper conoseal by sequentially torquing six seat 1 screws. The new design uses Grafoil packing at the upper joint which ,

seals over a much larger surface area and is seated using a single large  !

drive nut. The licensee's written basis for the change appears to be technically correct and the 10 CFR 50.59 questions were considered by the j licensee in the safety evaluation. The licensee stated that the design l requirements for the new CETNA meet those imposed for the original CETHA. l The licensee also provided design reports, test reports, a video-tape of j the installation process for the new CETNA's, and provided a mock-up l demonstration of disassembly and reassembly of the old and new designs. 1 The licensee's evaluation appeared to be very thorough.

3. Increase Size of S/G Primary Manway Insert Screws - Refuel 3 (CMP 89-1013) il This modification increased the size of the S/G primary manway insert screws from 1/4" to 5/16" diameter. The change is needed as the 1/4" screws are of a marginal size and are susceptible to breakage during manway removal or installation. The $/G primary manway insert holds a gasket in place during manway removal or installation, and ensures that only corrosion-resistant material contacts the primary coolant. The insert is stainless steel while the manway cover is carbon steel. The mnway cover is secured over the insert during installation, therefore the insert screws perform their function only during assembly / disassembly.

of the manway. The licensee's written basis for the change appears to be technically correct and the 10 CFR 50.59 questions were considered by the

a ' < * ;*

, .: 0

.. (" licensee in the safety evaluation. The' licensee stated that the amount

'of materici removed from the S/G and insert is minimal and will not.

impact the_ function of either item. Also,. seismic qualification is not chanp'<d due to the insignificant change in mass.

4.; Remove Requirement for Periodic Grab Samples - 6/1/89 Letter'(CN 88-17)'

This change removed the requirement to do periodic grab air samples to ensure'that fixed monitors in the fuel building are operating properly, and removed the requirement to maintain periodic: decay corrected source activity- inventories.. The licensee's written basis' for the- change appears to be technically correct and the 10 CFR 50.59 questions were considered by the licensee in the safety evaluation. The licensee stated-that the grab samples of a localized area may not be representative compared to a process monitor which samples from an HVAC system that receives air flow from many different plant locations, therefore .

localized grab sampling is not a valid method to assure operability.

Regarding source activity inventories, source ca.libration sheets are available to calculate decay corrected sources activities when this information is needed.

5. Install, Vent Path Between D/G Air Compressor and Aftercooler - 6/1/89 Letter (CMP 86-0053)

This modification installed vent valves between the standby diesel generator starting air compressor and its downstream aftercooler. These vent valves will be used to vent high pressure air from the-system during periodic

. maintenance. The lack of vents presents a safety hazard when work is

.being done on the compressors. The licensee's written basis for the change appears to be technically arrect and the 10 CFR 50.59 questions were considered by the licensee in the safety evaluation. The' licensee stated that this modification is on equipment that is not safety related.

The piping, fittings and valves utilized in this modification have been selected to be compatible with the interfacing components. A failure of any of these components will not affect the design basis of a standby diesel engine due to a downstream safety-related check valve which.will prevent blowdown of the starting air tanks. Also, the slight increase in weight due to this modification will not adversely affect the existing piping system due to an additional pipe support being installed to sustain these additional loads.

.- .. . .. _ _ ____-__ -_---_