05000272/FIN-2012003-03
From kanterella
Revision as of 20:45, 20 February 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Deficient Control of Transient Equipment in Seismic Class Auxiliary Building |
| Description | The inspectors identified a NCV of TS 6.8.1.a Procedures and Programs, because PSEG failed to properly control and store transient material within seismic class I buildings such that the equipment did not pose a hazard to safe plant operation. Specifically, two large tool gang boxes were stored unrestrained in the vicinity of the sodium hydroxide storage tank and associated containment spray (CS) valves and two full 55 gallon SW maintenance drums were stored unrestrained next to the 11, 12, and 15 containment fan cooler unit (CFCU) SW flow transmitters. This issue was entered into PSEGs CAP as notification 20559092. PSEGs immediate corrective actions were to restrain the subject material in accordance with the PSEG procedure CC-AA-320-011, Transient Loads. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the equipment performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The issue was also similar to IMC 0612, Appendix E, Examples of Minor Issues, example 4.a which stated the issue was more than minor if the licensee routinely failed to follow their procedure and safety-related equipment was adversely impacted. Specifically, PSEG was not following the requirements of procedure CC-AA-320-011, Transient Loads, and equipment had been stowed in close vicinity of safety-related equipment. The finding was evaluated under IMC 0609, Attachment 4, Initial Screening and Characterization of Findings. The inspectors determined that the finding is of very low safety significance (Green) because it did not involve loss or degradation of equipment specifically designed to mitigate a seismic event, and did not involve total loss of a safety function that contributes to external event initiated core damage sequences. The finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of human performance, work practices, in that PSEG did not define and effectively communicate expectations regarding procedural compliance and personnel did not follow procedures. Specifically, station personnel did not follow procedures for the storage of transient loads in the auxiliary building. |
| Site: | Salem  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000272/2012003 Section 1R15 |
| Date counted | Jun 30, 2012 (2012Q2) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.15 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | D Schroeder R Nimitz A Burritt P Mckenna |
| CCA | H.8, Procedure Adherence |
| INPO aspect | WP.4 |
| ' | |
Finding - Salem - IR 05000272/2012003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Salem) @ 2012Q2
Self-Identified List (Salem)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||