ML20154R723

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:53, 22 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 880912-14.Violations Noted: Individual Listed on Authorized Users List Had Not Received Passing Grade on Written Exam Administered on 880426
ML20154R723
Person / Time
Site: 07000824
Issue date: 09/22/1988
From: Cline W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154R708 List:
References
70-0824-88-08, 70-824-88-8, NUDOCS 8810040339
Download: ML20154R723 (2)


Text

_ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION 3abcock and Wilcox Docket No.70-824 NNFD - Research Laboratory License No. SNM-778 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on September 12-14, 1988, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2. Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below:

License Condition 9 requires that licensed material be used in accordance  !

with the statements, representations and conditions contained in Chapters 1 through 8 of the license application dated November 26, 1985, and supplements thereto. Section 2.6.4 of the licenso application states

, that persons designated as Authorized Users shall be retrained annually '

] and that fittsfactory completion of the retraining shall be determined by i passing a written examination. '

Contrary to the above, on September 9,1988, an individual was included on the Authorized Riers list who had not satisfactorily ecmpleted the annual i

retraining in that he had not received a passing grade on the written examination administered on April 26, 1988, i  !

! This is a 3everity leval V violation (Supplement VI).

J <

, Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Babcock and Wilcox is hereby [

! required to subenit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory '

Comission ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region !!, and a copy to the NRC Resident

~

Inspectot, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and  !

shouldinclude[foreachviolation]: (1) admission or dental of the violation.

(2) the reason for the violation if adalitted. (3) the corrective steps which a have been taken and the results achieved. (4) the corrective steps which will i be tab to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance '

will be a. .eved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to f f

l bk I c

#ngygg@gp '

Babcock and Wilcox 2 Docket No.70-824 NNFD - Research Laboratory License No. SNM-778 extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

1 FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION frWilliamE. Cline, Chef i Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 2.2d day of September 1988

)

a l

I